MINIREVIEW
crossm
Metallo--Lactamases: Structure, Function, Epidemiology,
Treatment Options, and the Development Pipeline
Sara E. Boyd,a,d David M. Livermore,b David C. Hooper,c William W. Hopea
a Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
b Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
c
Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
d National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London,
London, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT Modern medicine is threatened by the global rise of antibiotic resis-
tance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria. Metallo--lactamase (MBL) en-
zymes are a particular concern and are increasingly disseminated worldwide,
though particularly in Asia. Many MBL producers have multiple further drug re-
sistances, leaving few obvious treatment options. Nonetheless, and more encour-
agingly, MBLs may be less effective agents of carbapenem resistance in vivo, un-
der zinc limitation, than in vitro. Owing to their unique structure and function
and their diversity, MBLs pose a particular challenge for drug development. They
evade all recently licensed -lactam–-lactamase inhibitor combinations, al-
though several stable agents and inhibitor combinations are at various stages in
the development pipeline. These potential therapies, along with the epidemiol-
ogy of producers and current treatment options, are the focus of this review.
KEYWORDS metallo--lactamase, treatment, pharmacology, drug development,
metalloenzymes
A ntimicrobial therapy is threatened by the global rise of resistance, especially in
Gram-negative bacteria (1), where resistance to -lactams is largely mediated by
-lactamases (2). Carbapenems evade most -lactamases but are hydrolyzed by
metallo--lactamases (MBLs) as well as by a few active-site serine -lactamases (SBLs),
notably members of the KPC and OXA-48-like groups. MBLs are chromosomal and
ubiquitous in some nonfermenters, including Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Aeromo-
nas spp., and Chryseobacterium spp., which are of modest clinical concern. A minority
of Bacteroides fragilis strains have a chromosomally encoded MBL, CfiA or CcrA, but
this is uncommon and is expressed strongly only if an upstream insertion sequence
provides an efficient promoter (3). More important are the acquired MBLs that are
spreading among members of the Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4);
these are associated with extremely drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes, with the produc- Citation Boyd SE, Livermore DM, Hooper DC,
Hope WW. 2020. Metallo-β-lactamases:
ers generally also being resistant to multiple aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and
structure, function, epidemiology, treatment
other agents as well as to -lactams. options, and the development pipeline.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00397-20.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00397-20.
CLASSIFICATION AND DIVERSITY OF METALLO--LACTAMASES
Copyright © 2020 American Society for
-Lactamases are classified by two major systems. The first is based on substrate Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
profiles and vulnerability to inhibitors (5) and places MBLs in its group 3, whereas Address correspondence to Sara E. Boyd,
groups 1 and 2 comprise SBLs. The second classifies -lactamases according to their
[email protected].
Accepted manuscript posted online 20 July
amino acid sequences, recognizing four enzyme classes (6). MBLs form class B, while
2020
SBLs are divided among classes A, C, and D (7). The MBLs are structurally and Published 21 September 2020
mechanistically dissimilar from SBLs, suggesting a separate evolutionary origin.
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy aac.asm.org 1
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
TABLE 1 Examples of chromosomal and plasmid-associated MBLs (11)
MBL type Species Enzyme(s) Subclass
Chromosomal Bacillus cereus BcII B1
Chryseobacterium indologenes IND B1
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica BlaB B1
Myroides odoratimimus MUS and MYO B1
Bacteroides fragilisa CfiA/CcrA B1
Aeromonas spp. CphA B2
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia L1 B3
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica GOB B3
Plasmid associated Verona integron-encoded metallo--lactamase (VIM) B1
New Delhi metallo--lactamase (NDM) B1
Imipenemase (IMP) B1
Sao Paulo metallo--lactamase (SPM) B1
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
German imipenemase (GIM) B1
KHM B1
Dutch imipenemase (DIM) B1
Serratia metallo--lactamase (SMB) B3
Adelaide imipenemase (AIM) B3
aUnlike most other chromosomal MBLs, the Bacteroides fragilis enzyme is rare in the species.
Class B enzymes are further divided into three subclasses—B1, B2, and B3— based
on differences in amino acid sequence at the active site, zinc ligands, zinc stoichiom-
etry, loop architecture, and substrate profiles (8). The important acquired MBLs, com-
prising the IMP, NDM, and VIM types, fall into subclass B1. They hydrolyze all currently
available -lactam antibiotics except monobactams (e.g., aztreonam) (9), as do most or
all other subclass B1 or B3 enzymes. In contrast, the CphA (subclass B2) MBLs of
Aeromonas spp. have narrow-spectrum activity directed exclusively against carbapen-
ems. Irrespective of subclass, MBLs are not inhibited by clavulanic acid, sulbactam,
tazobactam, or avibactam or by developmental penicillanic acid sulfones and diazabi-
cyclooctanes.
The important acquired subgroup B1 MBLs (Table 1) are mostly named based on
where they were first described; thus, for example, Verona integron-encoded metallo-
-lactamase (VIM) and New Delhi metallo--lactamase (NDM). The first acquired MBL
(imipenemase; IMP-1), was reported from clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and Serratia
marcescens in Japan in the 1990s (10), and its family now includes over 85 sequence
variants (11). The first VIM enzyme was found in P. aeruginosa in 1997 (12), with over
69 variants since described (11). NDM—now the most prevalent MBL in Enterobacterales
and Acinetobacter baumannii—was first identified in 2008 in Klebsiella pneumoniae and
Escherichia coli isolates from a patient who had travelled to Sweden from New Delhi,
India (13). Twenty-nine NDM variants have since been described, (11).
It is easy to be dismissive of the chromosomal subclass B2 and B3 MBLs, but recent
reports highlight Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as a multidrug-resistant pathogen in
immunocompromised hosts (14). S. maltophilia carries a subclass B3 MBL (L1 enzyme),
which is unique among MBLs in having four identical subunits (15), in addition to a
chromosomally mediated SBL (L2 enzyme). This combination confers resistance to
almost all -lactams, although MICs vary with methodology, because media affect the
expression and/or function of these enzymes (16). Elizabethkingia meningoseptica has
two chromosomal MBLs, a B1 enzyme (BlaB) and a B3 type (GOB), with the former
predominantly contributing to resistance (17).
GENETIC SUPPORT OF ACQUIRED MBLS
Acquired IMP and VIM enzymes generally are encoded by gene cassettes within
class 1 or class 3 integrons. These may be embedded within transposons, allowing
insertion into the bacterial chromosome or plasmids (18). In contrast, the blaNDM gene
is not integron associated and has been observed on narrow-host-range plasmids
belonging to incompatibility group IncF, in addition to wide-host-range plasmids
belonging to IncA/C, IncL/M, IncH, and IncN (19–22). K. pneumoniae and E. coli are the
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 2
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
FIG 1 Amino acid residues that bind zinc at the active sites of B1, B2, and B3 MBLs. (A) Crystal structures
of B1 enzymes, including IMP, VIM, NDM, and B. fragilis CcrA, reveal two zinc-binding sites (Zn1 and Zn2).
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
The Zn1 site contains three histidine residues (His116, His118, and His196), whereas the ligands for the
Zn2 site are aspartic acid (Asp120), cysteine (Cys221), and histidine (His263). (B and C) There is only one
zinc ion in the active site of the Aeromonas hydrophila enzyme (subclass B2) (B) and two in the active site
S. maltophilia enzyme (subclass B3) (C). (Republished with permission from reference 8.)
frequent hosts of these plasmids, and there are particular associations with K. pneu-
moniae sequence type 11 (ST11), ST14, ST15, and ST147 and E. coli ST167, ST410, or
ST617 (23). These should not, however, be seen as global epidemic strains along the
lines of K. pneumoniae ST258 variants with KPC carbapenemases, for many are common
STs without carbapenemases. In A. baumannii, the blaNDM-1 gene is generally located
within the composite transposon Tn125 and embedded between two copies of a strong
promoter gene ISAba125 (24, 25); it is much less prevalent in this genus than are OXA
carbapenemases (class D).
B2 and B3 MBLs are generally chromosomally encoded, ubiquitous in their host
species, and not transmissible. However, exceptions exist, with horizontal transfer
having been observed. Thus, the AIM-1 MBL (B3) was initially reported, in 2012, to be
encoded by a gene inserted in (and atypical of) the chromosome of a P. aeruginosa
isolate; subsequently, in 2019, it was reported from K. pneumoniae (26). The blaLMB-1
gene, encoding another subclass B3 enzyme, was reported to be located on a plasmid
in Rheinheimera pacifica, where it was flanked by ISCR mobilization sequences, implying
transfer from some other (unknown) source organism. (27). Mobilization of blaSMB-1,
encoding a third subclass B3 enzyme, has occurred similarly (28).
STRUCTURE AND CATALYTIC FUNCTION OF MBLS
Irrespective of subgroup, MBLs contain the ␣/␣ fold typical of the metallo-
hydrolase/oxidoreductase superfamily (29). The S. maltophilia enzyme has four identical
subunits (15), whereas other MBLs are monomeric.
B1 and B3 MBLs have a shallow active-site groove containing 1 or 2 catalytically
functional divalent zinc ions, flanked by flexible loops (29). In contrast, the B2 enzymes
have an active site that is less accessible and flanked by a helix (30). Except for these
consistencies, MBLs are highly divergent even within subclasses and have as little as
20% sequence identity between subclasses (7). Figure 1 illustrates the amino acid
residues that bind zinc at the active sites of B1, B2, and B3 MBLs (8).
Mechanistically, the zinc ion(s) activates a water molecule, which acts to open the
-lactam ring (31). There is no covalent intermediate, as with SBL-mediated catalysis.
Anionic intermediates have been characterized when MBLs hydrolyze carbapenems
(32), but not when NDM-1 enzymes hydrolyze penicillins or cephalosporins (33). In
general, imipenem and meropenem are similarly good substrates for MBLs: for exam-
ple, NDM-1 displays similar catalytic activity, reflected in values of the kcat/Km ratio, for
imipenem (0.09 M⫺1 s⫺1) and meropenem (0.06 M⫺1 s⫺1) (34); biapenem is a
weaker substrate, owing to high Km values, but seems unsuitable for high-dose
development (35).
Differences in assay methodology between workers make it difficult to compare
hydrolytic efficiencies for different MBLs. Variation within, e.g., the VIM, IMP, Sao Paulo
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 3
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
metallo--lactamase (SPM), and German imipenemase (GIM) family appears largely
inconsequential (36). Nevertheless, subtle but important evolution may be ongoing, as
illustrated in the NDM family. Here, experimental data do not define major differences
in the catalytic efficiencies among NDM-1, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, and -8 enzymes (37) under
standard conditions, but differences are seen under zinc deprivation. Thus, studies
comparing NDM-1, NDM-4 (Met154Leu), and NDM-12 (Met154Leu, Gly222Asp) dem-
onstrate that the Met154Leu substitution, present in 50% of clinical NDM variants in
some locales, enhances the ability to confer resistance at low Zn2⫹ concentrations (38,
39). This is potentially important because, as discussed below, zinc is restricted in
infection (40) and its scarcity may impede the ability of classical NDM-1 enzyme to
confer clinical resistance. NDM variants that have increased affinity for zinc (up to
⬃10-fold-decreased dissociation constant for zinc [Kd, Zn2]) display selective advantages
in experiments that mimic zinc scarcity imposed by the host immune system (41).
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
Perhaps driven by similar pressures, the NDM-15 variant has evolved to function
efficiently as a mono- rather than a bi-zinc enzyme (41). In addition, there are sugges-
tions that NDM enzymes are evolving to develop greater thermodynamic stability (37).
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND DISTRIBUTION OF ACQUIRED MBLs
Bacteria with IMP, VIM, and NDM enzymes have been identified in a range of
community, hospital, and environmental settings (42). Their prevalence and their
importance relative to serine carbapenemases vary greatly by country. Figure 2 illus-
trates the global distribution of acquired MBLs.
Indian subcontinent, Asia, and Russia. The greatest burden of acquired, plasmid-
mediated MBLs lies in South and Southeast Asia (43), where NDM types are prevalent.
As already noted, blaNDM-1 was first identified in bacteria isolated in 2008 from a patient
who had travelled to Sweden from India (44). NDM variants have subsequently been
spread worldwide via patient transfers and travel (45). Epidemiological surveillance has
confirmed that NDM-1 and its variants are widely disseminated throughout India,
Pakistan, and Bangladesh (46, 47); moreover, a review of 39 carbapenem-resistant
Enterobacterales (CRE) collected in India in 2006-2007 by the SENTRY Antimicrobial
Surveillance Program found that 15 harbored blaNDM-1 (48), indicating that it was
circulating prior to its “discovery” in 2008. Enterobacterales with blaNDM were isolated
from public tap water in India (49) and in river systems around pilgrimage sites (42),
demonstrating that the gene has become established beyond health care environ-
ments.
In India, there is frequent cocarriage with other carbapenemases in Enterobacterales
(50); thus, in 2012, of 113 nonclonal CRE isolates at a Mumbai hospital, 106 produced
NDM enzymes, and 21 of these also had a second carbapenemase, most often an
OXA-48-like (n ⫽ 17) or VIM-type (n ⫽ 4) enzyme. Surprisingly, given that most inter-
national reports of NDM enzymes relate to Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa was the most
common MBL host (24%) among 3,414 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria
collected from community and hospital settings in North India (51), with blaNDM-1 (36%)
being the most prevalent carbapenemase gene, followed by blaVIM (18.4%).
Although KPC is the principal carbapenemase among Enterobacterales (CPE) in
China, a survey across 25 provinces showed that 32% of phenotypic carbapenem
resistance in Enterobacterales was linked to blaNDM-1 (52), while a study (2012 to 2016)
of clinical Enterobacter cloacae across three tertiary hospitals found blaNDM-1 to be the
most common carbapenemase gene (80%), followed by blaIMP-26 (8%) and blaIMP-4 (6%)
(53). The importance of IMP MBLs, particularly IMP-4, in China has been underscored by
others; thus, multiple Enterobacterales species carrying a plasmid encoding IMP-4
enzyme were identified from patients with epidemiological links to China (54), and
surveillance at a Beijing hospital highlighted both IMP-4 and NDM-1 in K. pneumoniae
(55). Colocalization of blaNDM-9 and the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1
was seen in an E. coli strain recovered from retail chicken meat in Guangzhou, China
(56). Having been recognized 30 years ago in Japan, IMP-type enzymes are now
endemic there, though not highly prevalent (57).
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 4
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
FIG 2 Global distribution of acquired MBLs.
NDM MBLs are the second most prevalent carbapenemases after OXA-48 in the
Middle East, excepting Israel (58, 59). This probably reflects extensive interactions with
the Indian subcontinent. As in India, there is significant penetration of blaNDM into P.
aeruginosa, for which a much greater proportion of carbapenem resistance appears
to be carbapenemase mediated in the Middle East than in Europe or the United
States. Thus, in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, blaVIM was found in 39% of
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 5
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates (60), with most hosts belonging to inter-
nationally disseminated high risk clones, including ST235, ST111, ST233, ST654, and
ST357 (60). These lineages seem unusually adept at acquiring extrinsic resistance genes.
In Dubai, 32% of resistant P. aeruginosa isolates produced VIM-type MBLs (61), though
a larger proportion had outer membrane impermeability.
The proportion of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa harboring MBLs in Russia rose
from 4.5% between 2002 and 2004 to 28.7% between 2008 and 2010 (62), largely
reflecting the spread of an XDR blaVIM-2-positive ST235 high-risk clone, also present in
Belarus and Kazakhstan (62). NDM is reported as the predominant carbapenemase
among Enterobacterales in St. Petersburg (63, 64), whereas OXA-48 is predominant in
Moscow (65).
Europe. Although Italy had earlier reported both IMP and VIM enzymes (66), Greece
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
was the first European country to report extensive dissemination of Enterobacterales
with MBLs. Specifically, K. pneumoniae with VIM carbapenemases were reported from
multiple hospitals in 2003 to 2007, and multilocus sequence typing identified three
major clonal complexes (CCs)—CC147, CC18, and CC14 —among the producers (67). By
2006, 20% of K. pneumoniae isolates collected from hospital wards and 50% of those
from intensive care units (ICUs) monitored by the Greek System for the Surveillance of
Antimicrobial Resistance were carbapenem resistant, largely owing to the spread of the
blaVIM-1 cassette (68). By 2010, KPC had displaced VIM to become the dominant
carbapenemase in Greece, largely through the spread of a K. pneumoniae ST258 variant
(69). Nonetheless, VIM types remained scattered, and they may now be reemerging due
to suppression of the KPC carbapenemases via the use of ceftazidime-avibactam (70).
Elsewhere in Europe, concern about carbapenemases grew following a flurry of
press interest in NDM enzymes from 2008 to 2010 and with the spread of K. pneu-
moniae ST258/512 lineages with KPC carbapenemases in Italy from 2010. The United
Kingdom, taken as an example, recorded a few P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales
strains with IMP and VIM MBLs before 2008. Thereafter, the number of Enterobacterales
with NDM enzymes increased (46). Most early cases were imports via patients who had
travelled to (and often been hospitalized in) the Indian subcontinent. Multiple NDM
variants have subsequently been reported in the United Kingdom, with NDM-1 being
the most frequent among Enterobacterales, followed by NDM-5 and NDM-7 (71). In
contrast, VIM variants account for 91% of the (uncommon) MBLs in P. aeruginosa, again
associated with international high-risk clones, including ST235, ST111, ST233, and
ST357 (72).
While referral of CPE isolates to the national reference laboratory has increased
100-fold since 2008, many producers are from screening rather than clinical samples.
OXA-48 is now the fastest-spreading carbapenemase, but isolates with NDM enzymes
account for 20 to 25% of CPE submitted. A growing minority of these, particularly E. coli,
have both NDM- and OXA-48-like enzymes (71, 73).
In 2012, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control launched its
European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) project.
The geographic distribution of enzyme types was estimated by national experts across
38 European countries in 2015 (74). A random sample of carbapenem-susceptible and
-nonsusceptible K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains subsequently were collected prospec-
tively to determine the occurrence of carbapenemases (75). The results, published in
2017, revealed that SBLs (KPC or OXA-48 enzymes) were more prevalent than MBLs in
most countries but that MBLs were widely scattered and were the most prevalent
carbapenemases among Enterobacterales in a few countries. Thus, VIM enzymes were
the dominant carbapenemases in Hungary, and NDM enzymes were dominant in Serbia
and Montenegro. The prevalence of NDM enzymes in the latter countries tallies with
early descriptions of producers linked to these Balkan states. It is unclear whether these
originated as imports from India or as independent local gene escapes from the
unknown source organism (76).
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 6
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
North America. Infections due to Enterobacterales carrying blaVIM-2, blaVIM-7,
blaIMP-4, and blaIMP-18 genes were recorded in the United States prior to 2005 but, in
general, MBLs remained extremely rare (1, 77). In 2010, Enterobacterales harboring
NDM-1 were isolated from three patients in different states (78) and, as with many
contemporaneous cases in the United Kingdom and elsewhere, the source patients had
all recently been in India or Pakistan (21). Subsequent expansion of NDM enzymes in
the United States has been less marked than in the United Kingdom, with KPC
carbapenemases becoming considerably more prevalent. Nevertheless, until December
2017, 379 CPE with NDM carbapenemases were reported to the CDC from 34 states,
with just under a third (i.e., 109) from Illinois (79), where an outbreak was associated
with contaminated endoscopes.
Enterobacterales with NDM enzymes have been increasing in Canada since 2008, and
these MBLs are now the second most common carbapenemases in the country, with a
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
higher prevalence in the western provinces (80). Surveillance conducted between 2007
and 2015 in Toronto revealed that, among 291 clinical CPE, 51% had NDM enzymes,
and 24% of the patients had never received health care abroad or travelled to high-risk
areas (81), suggesting that the enzymes are established locally. In 2019, a novel MBL,
blaCAM-1, was identified from isolates that were collected in 2007 (82). No subsequent
isolates harboring this gene have been reported.
Africa. Because of the paucity of data, the prevalence of CPE carrying MBLs in Africa
is difficult to estimate. Apparent infrequency may reflect true rarity, limited sampling,
or a lack of infrastructure for accurate detection. CPE with VIM MBLs nonetheless have
been identified in Nigeria, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Tanzania, and South Africa, and
CPE with NDM enzymes have been found in Kenya, Nigeria, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia,
Tanzania, and South Africa (83, 84). Infections caused by Enterobacterales producing
MBLs are reported from both imported and local cases, raising concerns regarding
emerging endemicity (85). Those with IMP-type enzymes have been identified in small
numbers in Morocco, Tunisia, and Tanzania and appear genuinely uncommon (84). An
outbreak caused by Klebsiella spp. carrying blaNDM-5 was reported from a neonatal unit
in Nigeria (86). A concern is that African patients are strongly represented in medical
tourism to India, which is a risk factor for colonization with Enterobacterales producing
MBLs (87).
Rest of the world. KPC enzymes dominate among carbapenemases from Entero-
bacterales in Latin America, with (unusually) some penetration also into P. aeruginosa.
Nonetheless, Enterobacterales with NDM enzymes are endemic in Brazil, with several
outbreaks reported (88). Early case reports of MBL-producing Enterobacterales in Latin
America often concerned members of the Proteeae, including Providencia spp. and
Morganella (89, 90), which are infrequent hosts of blaNDM elsewhere. This creates a
treatment issue, since these genera are inherently resistant to polymyxins and newer
tetracyclines, which remain options against other MBL-producing Enterobacterales
(below).
Unique to South America is the wide distribution in Brazil of P. aeruginosa with
SPM-1 MBL (91), principally associated with an ST277 clone. Outcomes of severe
infections with this clone are often poor, reflecting a lack of good treatment options
(92).
Carbapenemases are rare in Australasia, but there is spread of blaIMP-4 among
Enterobacterales (93), as in parts of China. E. cloacae is a major host, with dissemination
mediated by an IncHI2 plasmid (94). Production of IMP-4 has also been recorded in
Salmonella spp. from domestic pets (95) and seagulls (96), but the significance of this
is uncertain.
MBL FUNCTION IN RESISTANCE, IN VITRO AND IN VIVO
For many years MBLs were perceived as clinically unimportant chromosomally
encoded enzymes from nonpathogenic organisms, notably Bacillus cereus (97, 98). This
perception changed with the recognition that MBLs confer much of the resistance seen
in Chryseobacterium spp. and E. meningoseptica (99) and with heightened awareness of
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 7
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
the morbidity and mortality associated with S. maltophilia bacteremia (100, 101).
Interest then escalated with the discovery and proliferation of acquired MBLs, especially
NDM-1, which drew extensive press coverage in 2010.
Many MBL producers are broadly resistant in vitro and, on this basis, real concern
exists about lack of treatments. On the other hand, there is evidence that in vivo
resistance to carbapenems may be less than it appears in vitro, because susceptibility
tests are conventionally done in media (e.g., cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth) with
high zinc concentrations (102), whereas the host immune system imposes a state of
zinc deprivation in infection (40, 103). This lack of zinc may not only impede the
catalytic function of MBLs but may also interfere with their protein folding (102) and
may promote degradation of the enzyme in the periplasm (104).
Several preclinical studies suggest a disconnect between high-level in vitro resis-
tance to carbapenems associated with NDM-1 enzymes and a weak ability to protect
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
against carbapenems in standard murine infection models (105). Moreover, NDM
enzymes appear to be less effective than other carbapenemases in causing resistance
to carbapenems in patients (106, 107). Thus, mortality in severe infections due to
Enterobacterales with blaNDM appears to be relatively low, ranging from 13% (108) to
55% (109), compared to that seen with bacteria expressing other MBLs (18% to 67%)
(13) or KPC carbapenemases (41% to 65%) (110, 111). Good clinical outcomes have
been reported despite treatment with agents to which NDM enzymes confer resistance
in vitro (106, 107, 112). As yet, there are no studies that confirm or refute whether the
higher-numbered NDM alleles, encoding variants with greater affinity for zinc (above),
are better able to cause clinical resistance than NDM-1 (39, 41).
Finally, it should be underscored that while these indications that NDM MBLs are
less potent in vivo are intriguing, they should be approached with caution. Double-
blinded randomized controlled trials have not been conducted, and existing outcome
data are subject to various biases (113, 114). For VIM MBLs, clinical outcomes correlate
with carbapenem MICs, implying little or no such in vitro-in vivo discordance (115).
CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS
Limited data exist to inform clinicians on the optimal treatment for infections caused
by MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria (106). Cotrimoxazole remains the standard
of care for infections due to S. maltophilia, but most Enterobacterales with acquired
MBLs also have sul and dfr genes, conferring resistance. Genes encoding resistance to
fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides are often present alongside genes encoding
acquired MBLs. In particular, blaNDM genes are often linked to the genes encoding
ArmA or RmtB methyltransferases, which modify ribosomes to block binding of amin-
oglycosides, including plazomicin; blaIMP and blaVIM generally occur within integrons
that often also carry aac(6=), encoding an acetyltransferase that compromises amikacin
and tobramycin, though not gentamicin or plazomicin (116). A thorough review of
treatment options for MDR and XDR Enterobacterales is available (117). This highlights
observational studies comparing monotherapy to combination therapy for blood-
stream infection (BSI) involving CRE, although few of these were specifically identified
as having MBLs (118, 119).
Colistin. Colistin is the current mainstay of treatment for infections due to MBL
producers. A multinational survey of MBL-producing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa
conducted from 2012 to 2014 found ⬎97% susceptibility among MBL-producing P.
aeruginosa strains (variously with IMP, VIM, and NDM enzymes) and ⬎85% for MBL-
producing Enterobacterales (⬎86.1% NDM type and ⬎88.9% IMP type) (83). Exceptions
are Proteeae and Serratia spp., which have intrinsic polymyxin resistance.
For bacteria harboring KPC and OXA-48 carbapenemases, colistin has recently been
shown to be less effective than microbiologically active -lactamase inhibitor combi-
nations (120), making it plausible that an active -lactam likewise would be more
efficacious than colistin against MBL producers. Of note, the emergence of colistin
resistance during treatment, with secondary transmission of resistant variants, is a
concern (121, 122).
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 8
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline. The tetracyclines tigecycline, om-
adacycline, and eravacycline have strong in vitro activity against many MBL-producing
Enterobacterales, except Proteeae, although not against P. aeruginosa. During November
2018, 275 unique Enterobacterales isolates carrying blaNDM collected by the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention were tested with tigecycline (86.5% susceptible,
based on a ⱕ2-g/ml FDA breakpoint), eravacycline (66.2% susceptible, based on a
ⱕ0.5-g/ml FDA breakpoint), and omadacycline (59.6% susceptible, based on a ⱕ4-
g/ml breakpoint) (123). The higher susceptibility rate for tigecycline than eravacycline
reflects the higher FDA breakpoint for Enterobacterales; in Europe, both agents have an
identical 0.5-g/ml breakpoint, and eravacycline is the more active on a simple
gravimetric basis, though it is unclear whether this confers a clinical advantage (124).
Merits of omadacycline are its minimal known drug interactions and its ability to be
administered orally (125); however, it has the least relevant license (for community-
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections) in
relation to the clinical burden of MBL producers.
While the in vitro activity of these tetracyclines is encouraging, there are multiple
caveats. First, tigecycline carries an FDA “black box” warning of increased mortality
when the drug was used as monotherapy (126); second, both tigecycline and erava-
cycline have failed to achieve noninferiority to comparators in one or more clinical trials
(ventilator-associated pneumonia and diabetic foot infection for tigecycline, compli-
cated urinary tract infection [cUTI] for eravacycline); third, there is little provenance for
tetracyclines as monotherapy in the severely ill patients who commonly develop
infections due to MBL-producing opportunists; fourth, particularly for tigecycline, the
disparity between EUCAST (ⱕ0.5 g/ml) and FDA (ⱕ2 g/ml) susceptibility breakpoints
creates categorization uncertainty; last, the lack of anti-Proteeae activity is important in
Latin America, where Providencia spp. are frequent hosts of blaNDM (127). Given these
uncertainties, the best advice is to consider using these tetracyclines in combination
against MBL producers, not as monotherapy.
Aztreonam. Aztreonam is stable to MBLs, though activity is lost against organisms
that coproduce extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC enzymes (128),
which are common in MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Clinical experience with aztreo-
nam as monotherapy is lacking for MBL producers, although some success was
recorded when aztreonam was used in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam (129,
130), with avibactam serving to inhibit ESBLs. Six of 10 patients survived following
treatment with this combination during an outbreak of K. pneumoniae with NDM-1,
OXA-48, and CTX-15 -lactamases in Barcelona (129). Although no adverse events were
reported, the safety is unclear, and it is difficult to match the regimen of aztreonam-
avibactam (1.5 g ⫹ 0.5 g every six hours [q6h]) that is presently being developed (see
below).
Fosfomycin. Fosfomycin commonly retains full in vitro activity against MBL-producing
Enterobacterales and has been successful in trials, very recently, as an i.v. agent in cUTI (131).
It may be an option against MBL producers—particularly E. coli, which is more suscep-
tible than other Enterobacterales— but it is mainly advocated for use in combination
due to concerns about emergence of resistance, particularly in Klebsiella spp. (132).
Fosfomycin has little direct antipseudomonal activity, with typical MICs above break-
points. However, in vitro synergy is seen when fosfomycin is combined with mero-
penem against MBL-producing P. aeruginosa strains (133), suggesting a need for in vivo
exploration.
DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE
The development pipeline represents four main strategies against MBL producers: (i)
protection of MBL-stable-monobactams from other coproduced -lactamases, as, e.g.,
with aztreonam-avibactam; (ii) development of -lactams stable to MBLs as well as
SBLs, as with, e.g., cefiderocol and BOS-228; (iii) combinations of cephalosporins and
carbapenems with triple-action diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs); and (iv) direct inhibition of
MBLs with cyclic boronates, thiols, chelators, dicarboxylic acids, and other agents.
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 9
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Aztreonam-avibactam. Aztreonam-avibactam is the first antibiotic to be developed
under a public-private partnership agreement (134, 135), with partial financing from the
European Union’s Innovative Medicine’s Initiative and, latterly, also the U.S. Biomedical
Advanced Research and Developmental Authority (BARDA). A prospective randomized
phase 3 study (NCT03580044) is scheduled to begin in 2020 to determine efficacy,
safety, and tolerability versus best available therapy (BAT) for hospitalized adults with
complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP), cUTI, or BSI
due to MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria (135).
Aztreonam evades hydrolysis by MBLs (128) but is compromised by the ESBL and
AmpC enzymes that are coproduced by many MBL-positive CPE. These SBLs are
inhibited by avibactam, a diazabicyclooctane (DBO) (136, 137), and consequently,
MBL-producing Enterobacterales that also carry ESBLs or AmpC are susceptible to
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
aztreonam-avibactam in vitro (138) and in vivo (139). The combination is less reliably
active against MBL-producing P. aeruginosa (140), because aztreonam has weak
antipseudomonal activity.
Considerable interest in this approach exists, because the safety and efficacy of
aztreonam are well established and because avibactam was established to be effective
at inactivating ESBLs and AmpC enzymes during trials with ceftazidime. Moreover, case
reports suggest success against infections caused by MBL producers when aztreonam
was coadministered with ceftazidime-avibactam (see “Aztreonam” above) (129, 130).
MBL-stable -lactams. (i) Cefiderocol (S-649266). Cefiderocol (S-649266) is a
novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin designed by Shionogi & Co., Ltd., with a
catechol linked to its 3-position side chain. It is licensed in the United States for cUTI
and in the European Union and United Kingdom for “treatment of infections due to
aerobic Gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options” (141). It is
retained among developmental agents here, rather than being included in the estab-
lished treatments, because there is little published experience with MBL producers to
date (142, 143).
Critically, the catechol moiety forms a chelation complex with ferric iron, and this
complex is actively accumulated by Gram-negative bacteria, which are forced to
scavenge this essential element (144). Cefiderocol has good activity in vitro under iron
starvation against Gram-negative bacteria, including CPE, P. aeruginosa, and A. bau-
mannii (145). It is relatively stable to both SBLs and MBLs (144); however, the MICs for
Enterobacterales and nonfermenters with NDM carbapenemases tend to be slightly
higher than those for isolates of the same species with other carbapenemase types
(146). Cefiderocol proved effective against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (ex-
pressing IMP-1 enzymes), A. baumannii (expressing OXA-51-like enzymes), and K.
pneumoniae (expressing NDM-1 enzymes) in immunocompetent rat respiratory tract
infection models, achieving a ⱖ3-log reduction in the number of viable bacteria in the
lungs when given over 4 days so as to recreate the human exposures of an infusion
regimen involving 2 g q8h given i.v. for 3 h (147). Efficacy decreased when the infusion
time was reduced to 1 h, owing to a lower percentage of the dosing interval during
which free-drug concentrations were above the MIC (Tf ⬎MIC) (147). Interestingly, the
mean Tf ⬎MIC required for a 1-log10 reduction was 18 to 24% greater for A. baumannii
isolates (expressing OXA-23 or OXA-24) in the murine lung infection model than for
Enterobacterales expressing NDM-1, NDM-4, or KPC-2 enzymes and for P. aeruginosa
isolates expressing IMP-1 or VIM-10 MBLs (148).
In humans, the infusion regimen of 2 g q8h i.v. over 3 h provided ⬎90% probability
of target attainment (PTA) with 75% Tf ⬎MIC for MICs of ⱕ 4 g/ml for patients with
normal renal function (149). A phase 3 trial (NCT03032380) has shown noninferiority to
meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia (150). Less encouragingly, another trial
(NCT02714595) found excessive deaths in the cefiderocol arm, compared with best
available therapy, for patients with severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant
Gram-negative pathogens (151). Full analysis is awaited but, notably, deaths were
mostly associated with Acinetobacter infections (152), not Enterobacterales.
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 10
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(ii) BOS-228 (formerly LYS228). BOS-228 is a monobactam and, like aztreonam, is
stable to MBLs (153). Unlike aztreonam, it is also stable to many potent SBLs, including
carbapenemases, ESBLs, and AmpC types (154); BOS-228 binds to penicillin-binding
protein 3 (PBP3) similarly to aztreonam, in addition to weak binding to PBP1a and
PBP1b of Enterobacterales (155). BOS-228 had an MIC90 of 2 g/ml for a clinical panel
of 88 Enterobacterales isolates expressing ESBLs, KPCs, and MBLs (153), and no single-
step mutants were selected from 12 -lactamase-expressing Enterobacterales exposed
to the drug at 8⫻ MIC, though mutants were selected from 2/12 strains, neither of
which expressed MBLs, at 4⫻ MIC (155).
A randomized evaluator-blinded multicenter phase 2 trial (NCT03354754) to evalu-
ate pharmacokinetics, clinical responses, safety, and tolerability of BOS-228 in cIAI
commenced in 2018. The drug is being administered as i.v. monotherapy (without
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
metronidazole) q6h for at least 5 days and compared to standard of care, with out-
comes evaluated at day 28. A randomized controlled evaluator-blinded multicenter trial
(NCT03377426) in cUTI has also been initiated.
Cephalosporins or carbapenems combined with triple-action DBOs—zidebac-
tam and nacubactam. Unlike with cyclic boronates (see below), it has not been
possible to discover DBOs that directly inhibit MBLs. However, nacubactam and zide-
bactam are DBO analogs that combine inhibition of SBLs with direct antibacterial
activity by inhibiting PBP2 (156). When combined with PBP3-targetted -lactams, this
attack on PBP2 leads to an “enhancer” effect, with further -lactamase inhibition-
independent synergy observed (156, 157). Consequently, cefepime-zidebactam and
cefepime- or meropenem-nacubactam combinations are active in vitro against ⬎75%
of MBL-producing Enterobacterales and, in cefepime-zidebactam’s case, also against
many MBL-producing P. aeruginosa strains (158).
Although the direct antibacterial activity of nacubactam and zidebactam is readily
lost via mutations compensating for inhibition of PBP2 (159), the enhancer effect is
retained, with many of the mutants consequently remaining susceptible to, e.g.,
cefepime-zidebactam or meropenem-nacubactam at low concentrations (156, 157).
Cefepime-zidebactam is currently the most advanced of these combinations, with a
phase 3 trial due to commence (160).
Direct inhibitors of MBLs. (i) Cyclic boronates—VNRX-5133 (taniborbactam)
and QPX7228. Inhibitors that target both SBLs and MBLs are of great interest but have
proved difficult to obtain owing to structural and functional differences between and
among these enzymes. This combination of inhibitory activities nonetheless has re-
cently been achieved with several cyclic boronates, notably taniborbactam and
QPX7228. These mimic the tetrahedral anionic intermediate common to SBL and MBL
catalysis (161) and additionally inhibit some penicillin-binding proteins (e.g., PBP 5,
which is nonessential) by the same mechanism (162). They represent a considerable
expansion in spectrum over vaborbactam, their progenitor, which inhibits only few
class A -lactamases, notably KPC types (163).
Taniborbactam (VenatoRx) is the more advanced of these two boronates and is in
phase III trials combined with cefepime (164). It irreversibly inhibits class A, C, and D
SBLs and is a reversible competitive inhibitor of VIM and NDM MBLs, though not of IMP
types (165). Safety has been established in healthy volunteers (NCT02955459), and the
FDA has allowed cefepime-taniborbactam to proceed via a fast-track pathway for the
clinical indications of cUTI and cIAI. QPX7728 (QPEX) likewise inhibits both SBLs and
MBLs: 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) for KPC enzymes are around 2.9 ⫾ 0.4 nM,
compared with 22 ⫾ 8 nM for the class C cephalosporinase of E. cloacae P99,
55 ⫾ 25 nM for the NDM-1 MBL, and 14 ⫾ 4 nM for VIM-1. As with taniborbactam, the
IC50 for IMP-1 is considerably higher, at 610 ⫾ 70 nM (166). An i.v. combination of
QPX7728 with meropenem is being explored. This significantly lowered bacterial
counts in murine thigh and lung infection models with carbapenem-resistant K. pneu-
moniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii compared to meropenem alone, although
strain genotypes were not reported. Unlike taniborbactam, QPX7228 is orally bioavail-
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 11
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
able, and combinations with ceftibuten and tebipenem were evaluated in vitro against
CPE, including those with MBLs (167).
(ii) Thiol-containing MBL inhibitors and chelating agents. Small molecules that
bind and/or chelate zinc ions include thiols, dicarboxylates, hydroxamates, and tetra-
zoles; these are widely reported to inhibit MBLs, but human metalloproteases are
vulnerable too, so toxicity may preclude clinical development.
Thiol-containing compounds inhibit all MBL subtypes (B1, B2, and B3) (168), with
strong competitive inhibition of IMP-1 by thioester derivatives first being reported in
1999 (169). The dipeptide L-captopril deserves mention in this context. It is used as an
ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor in the treatment of hypertension and is
reported also to inhibit MBLs by chelating the active-site zinc ions via its thiol group
(170); the corresponding D-stereoisomer is a more potent inhibitor and can potentiate
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
meropenem against strains with VIM-2 MBLs (170). Both captopril isomers act via zinc
chelation, and repurposing is attractive, given the known safety of the L-isomer at its
licensed dose; however, the economic model for development is yet to be established,
and safety issues for the D-isomer need exploration. Other thio-carbonyl compounds,
such as thiomandelic acid, exhibit synergy with meropenem against Enterobacterales
with VIM, NDM, and IMP enzymes (171).
Bisthiazolidines are carboxylate-containing bicyclic compounds, considered penicil-
lin analogs that inhibit MBLs through a zinc-bridging thiol group and a carboxylate that
interacts with K224 (172). The orientations of the carboxylate and thiol moieties create
diverse binding that is observed on X-ray crystal structures and has been shown to
inhibit all MBL types (173). The bisthiazolidine scaffold inhibits NDM-1 enzymes in vitro,
with Ki values in the low micromolar range (from 7 ⫾ 1 to 19 ⫾ 3 M); they restore
imipenem activity against E. coli strains producing NDM-1 (172).
ANT2681 (Antabio) is the lead compound from a series of thiazole carboxylate
derivatives which inhibit NDM and VIM through interaction with the dinuclear zinc ion
cluster present at the active site (189, 190). It binds in a noncovalent competitive
manner with respect to the substrate and is in late-stage preclinical development.
The divalent cation chelator EDTA has raised interest, too, both as an inhibitor of
MBLs and because it disrupts the Gram-negative outer membrane and neutralizes
various bacterial enzymes and toxins (174, 175). It is widely used in identification tests
for MBLs. Sodium calcium EDTA, which is licensed for use for treatment of lead
poisoning, reportedly restored imipenem’s activity in vivo against P. aeruginosa strains
producing IMP and VIM enzymes and against E. coli strains producing NDM-1 enzyme
(176, 177), raising the issue of whether it might be used to potentiate carbapenems in
human infections. Elores, which is marketed in India, combines ceftriaxone, sulbactam,
and EDTA (178, 179) and reportedly achieved cures of infections due to MBL producers
in multiple patients, with no serious adverse events (178). However, prospective and
controlled studies are lacking, the dose of EDTA is low, and there remains uncertainty
(see above) about the function of NDM-1 in vivo. More negatively, the FDA has placed
strict limits on the amount of EDTA permissible even in food (180), and sodium calcium
EDTA is capable of producing toxic effects that can be fatal (181). High concentrations
of EDTA are likely to strip divalent cations from human metalloenzymes, including
matrix metalloproteinases, carbonic anhydrase, and carboxypeptidases, thus limiting
clinical applicability.
Aspergillomarasmine A (AMA) is a fungal natural product discovered in the 1960s
(182) and reevaluated in the 1980s as an inhibitor of the human metalloproteinase
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). AMA inhibits MBLs via a metal ion seques-
tration mechanism and displays rapid and potent inhibition of NDM-1 and VIM-2
enzymes in vitro (183). It restored the activity of meropenem against a K. pneu-
moniae strain expressing NDM-1 enzyme in an intraperitoneal murine infection
model (184). Again, the hazard of inhibiting human metalloenzymes requires
careful investigation.
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 12
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
CHALLENGES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INHIBITORS OF MBLS
One of the biggest challenges in designing MBL inhibitors is the diversity among
these enzymes, which share less than one-third sequence identity at their active sites.
Thus, for example, taniborbactam and QPX7728 target NDM and VIM enzymes, but not
IMP types (185). Development of inhibitors that bind remotely from the active site
might overcome this limitation, but possible target areas also vary within class B1 and
seem even better able to tolerate mutations than the active site (29). Another challenge
is the shallow binding site in B1 enzymes, meaning that inhibitors can carry out only
limited interactions (29). Specificity for bacterial MBLs is a further recurring challenge;
interactions with human metalloenzymes and contingent toxicity are major concerns.
Molecules that solely inhibit MBLs are limited by the fact that many MBL producers also
coproduce SBLs, including carbapenemases, meaning that the partner -lactam must
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
evade these enzymes, that the inhibitor must inactivate both MBLs and SBLs, or that a
second inhibitor is required.
Preclinical development is challenging, too, because it is difficult to establish reliable
animal models in which MBL-mediated resistance is expressed, perhaps owing to the
already-mentioned lack of essential zinc at infection sites. Moreover, bacteria are prone
to lose MBL-encoding plasmids, or fail to reliably express them, in murine models,
resulting in pharmacodynamic data that suggest meropenem susceptibility (186, 187).
Consequently, it is difficult to establish the efficacy of candidate MBL-stable drugs or
inhibitor combinations. It is unclear if the same phenomena occur in patients (188), and
this requires further research. Irrespective of this aspect, it is also challenging to find
and recruit the required number of patients with MBL-producing pathogens to clinical
trials. Rapid diagnostics should help, but their use is complicated by cost and the need
to deploy them to all trial sites, including in countries where they are not licensed or
are licensed only to inform infection control, not treatment.
CONCLUSION
MBLs are disseminating internationally, particularly in Asia, and often are produced
by Gram-negative bacteria with extremely broad spectra of in vitro resistance. Unlike for
KPC and OXA-48-like carbapenemases, producers are typically not susceptible to
recently licensed -lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime-avibactam,
meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, although cefiderocol may be a po-
tential answer. The ability of MBLs to confer resistance to carbapenems may not be as
great in vivo as in vitro, though this is uncertain and may vary by enzyme type even
within MBL subclasses.
Inhibitors are known, and the developmental compounds boronates, taniborbac-
tam, and QPX7728 are of particular interest. Nonetheless, the quest for effective
inhibitors is complicated by differences in active-site structure and zinc ligand interac-
tions among MBLs and by difficulties in the design of appropriate preclinical and
clinical trials. Nonboronate inhibitors face toxicity issues, particularly if they interact
with other metalloenzymes or are general chelators. Other approaches to overcoming
MBLs include avibactam-protected aztreonam; stable -lactams, notably BOS-228 as
well as cefiderocol; and combinations of -lactams with triple-action DBOs, notably
cefepime-zidebactam and meropenem-nacubactam.
And that is the positive aspect on which to close: there is now a diverse and exciting
pipeline of potential agents for the treatment of infections caused by bacteria that
produce MBLs. It remains to be seen which will be the most effective of these agents.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
S.E.B. is funded by a UKRI Innovation Fellowship through the North West MRC
Scheme in Clinical Pharmacology and receives research support from Roche Pharma.
D.M.L. serves on advisory boards or has ad-hoc consultancy with Accelerate, Allecra,
Antabio, Centauri, Entasis, GlaxoSmithKline, J&J, Meiji, Melinta, Menarini, Mutabilis,
Nordic, ParaPharm, Pfizer, QPEX, Roche, Sandoz, Shionogi, T.A.Z., Tetraphase, VenatoRx,
Wockhardt, and Zambon; has delivered paid lectures for Astellas, bioMérieux, Beckman
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 13
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Coulter, Cardiome, Cepheid, Merck/MSD, Menarini, Nordic, Pfizer, and Shionogi; and has
relevant shareholdings or options in Dechra, GSK, Merck, Perkin Elmer, Pfizer, and T.A.Z.,
amounting to ⬍10% of portfolio value. D.C.H. is a consultant for Selux Diagnostics, Day
Zero Diagnostics, Wockhardt Pharmaceuticals, and Shionogi Pharmaceuticals. W.W.H.
holds or has recently held research grants with F2G, Astellas Pharma, Spero Therapeu-
tics, Antabio, Allecra, Bugworks, and NAEJA-RGM; holds awards from the Medical
Research Council, National Institute of Health Research, FDA, and the European Com-
mission; and has received personal fees in his capacity as a consultant for F2G, Amplyx,
Ausperix, Spero Therapeutics, VenatoRx, Pfizer, and BLC/TAZ.
REFERENCES
1. Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2005. Metallo--
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
17. González LJ, Vila AJ. 2012. Carbapenem resistance in Elizabethkingia
lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin Microbiol Rev 18:306 –325. meningoseptica is mediated by metallo--lactamase BlaB. Antimi-
https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.18.2.306-325.2005. crob Agents Chemother 56:1686 –1692. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC
2. World Health Organization. 2015. Global action plan on antimicrobial .05835-11.
resistance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Swizterland. 18. Bennett PM. 2008. Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition
3. Salonen JH, Eerola E, Meurman O. 1998. Clinical significance and out- and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br J Pharmacol
come of anaerobic bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 26:1413–1417. https:// 153(Suppl 1):S347–S357. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607.
doi.org/10.1086/516355. 19. Bonnin RA, Poirel L, Carattoli A, Nordmann P. 2012. Characterization of
4. World Health Organization, Kahlmeter G, Singh N. 2017. Global priority an IncFII plasmid encoding NDM-1 from Escherichia coli ST131. PLoS
list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery and One 7:e34752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034752.
development of new antibiotics. World Health Organization, Geneva, 20. Villa L, García-Fernández A, Fortini D, Carattoli A. 2010. Replicon se-
Swizterland. quence typing of IncF plasmids carrying virulence and resistance de-
5. Bush K, Jacoby GA. 2010. Updated functional classification of terminants. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2518 –2529. https://doi.org/10
-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:969 –976. https://doi .1093/jac/dkq347.
.org/10.1128/AAC.01009-09. 21. Rasheed JK, Kitchel B, Zhu W, Anderson KF, Clark NC, Ferraro MJ, Savard
6. Hall BG, Barlow M. 2005. Revised Ambler classification of -lactamases. P, Humphries RM, Kallen AJ, Limbago BM. 2013. New Delhi metallo--
J Antimicrob Chemother 55:1050 –1051. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/ lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae, United States. Emerg Infect
dki130. Dis 19:870 – 878. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1906.121515.
7. Garau G, García-Sáez I, Bebrone C, Anne C, Mercuri P, Galleni M, Frère 22. Nithya N, Remitha R, Jayasree PR, Faisal M, Manish Kumar PR. 2017.
J-M, Dideberg O. 2004. Update of the standard numbering scheme for Analysis of -lactamases, blaNDM-1 phylogeny and plasmid replicons in
class B -lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2347–2349. multidrug-resistant Klebsiella spp. from a tertiary care centre in south
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.7.2347-2349.2004. India. Indian J Med Res 146:S38 –S45. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR
8. Palzkill T. 2013. Metallo--lactamase structure and function. Ann N Y Acad _31_16.
Sci 1277:91–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06796.x. 23. Wu W, Feng Y, Tang G, Qiao F, McNally A, Zong Z. 2019. NDM metallo-
9. Marshall S, Hujer AM, Rojas LJ, Papp-Wallace KM, Humphries RM, -lactamases and their bacterial producers in health care settings. Clin
Spellberg B, Hujer KM, Marshall EK, Rudin SD, Perez F, Wilson BM, Microbiol Rev 32:e00115-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00115-18.
Wasserman RB, Chikowski L, Paterson DL, Vila AJ, van Duin D, Kreiswirth 24. Poirel L, Bonnin RA, Boulanger A, Schrenzel J, Kaase M, Nordmann P.
BN, Chambers HF, Fowler VG, Jacobs MR, Pulse ME, Weiss WJ, Bonomo 2012. Tn125-related acquisition of blaNDM-like genes in Acinetobacter
RA, Bonomo RA. 2017. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam over- baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1087–1089. https://doi
come -lactam resistance conferred by metallo--lactamases in Enter- .org/10.1128/AAC.05620-11.
obacteriaceae? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02243-16. https:// 25. Joshi PR, Acharya M, Kakshapati T, Leungtongkam U, Thummeepak R,
doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02243-16. Sitthisak S. 2017. Co-existence of blaOXA-23 and blaNDM-1 genes of
10. Watanabe M, Iyobe S, Inoue M, Mitsuhashi S. 1991. Transferable imi- Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Nepal: antimicrobial resistance
penem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Che- and clinical significance. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 6:21. https://
mother 35:147–151. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.35.1.147. doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0180-5.
11. Naas T, Oueslati S, Bonnin RA, Dabos ML, Zavala A, Dortet L, Retailleau 26. Zhou H, Guo W, Zhang J, Li Y, Zheng P, Zhang H. 2019. Draft genome
P, Iorga BI. 2017. Beta-lactamase database (BLDB)—structure and func- sequence of a metallo--lactamase (blaAIM-1)-producing Klebsiella
tion. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 32:917–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/ pneumoniae ST1916 isolated from a patient with chronic diarrhoea.
14756366.2017.1344235. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 16:165–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar
12. Lauretti L, Riccio ML, Mazzariol A, Cornaglia G, Amicosante G, Fontana .2019.01.010.
R, Rossolini GM. 1999. Cloning and characterization of blaVIM, a new 27. Dabos L, Rodriguez CH, Nastro M, Dortet L, Bonnin RA, Famiglietti A,
integron-borne metallo--lactamase gene from a Pseudomonas aerugi- Iorga BI, Vay C, Naas T. 2020. LMB-1 producing Citrobacter freundii from
nosa clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1584 –1590. Argentina, a novel player in the field of MBLs. Int J Antimicrob Agents
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.43.7.1584. 55:105857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.11.014.
13. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. 2011. Global spread of carbapenemase- 28. Wachino J, Yoshida H, Yamane K, Suzuki S, Matsui M, Yamagishi T,
producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1791–1798. https:// Tsutsui A, Konda T, Shibayama K, Arakawa Y. 2011. SMB-1, a novel
doi.org/10.3201/eid1710.110655. subclass B3 metallo--lactamase, associated with ISCR1 and a class 1
14. Brooke JS. 2012. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global integron, from a carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens clinical iso-
opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:2– 41. https://doi.org/10 late. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5143–5149. https://doi.org/10
.1128/CMR.00019-11. .1128/AAC.05045-11.
15. Denton M, Kerr KG. 1998. Microbiological and clinical aspects of infec- 29. Mojica MF, Bonomo RA, Fast W. 2016. B1-metallo--lactamases: where
tion associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin Microbiol Rev do wesStand? Curr Drug Targets 17:1029 –1050. https://doi.org/10
11:57– 80. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.11.1.57. .2174/1389450116666151001105622.
16. Akova M, Bonfiglio G, Livermore DM. 1991. Susceptibility to 30. Brem J, Struwe WB, Rydzik AM, Tarhonskaya H, Pfeffer I, Flashman E,
-lactam antibiotics of mutant strains of Xanthomonas maltophilia van Berkel SS, Spencer J, Claridge TDW, McDonough MA, Benesch JLP,
with high- and low-level constitutive expression of L1 and L2 beta- Schofield CJ. 2015. Studying the active-site loop movement of the São
lactamases. J Med Microbiol 35:208 –213. https://doi.org/10.1099/ Paolo metallo--lactamase-1. Chem Sci 6:956 –963. https://doi.org/10
00222615-35-4-208. .1039/c4sc01752h.
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 14
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
31. Page MI, Badarau A. 2008. The mechanisms of catalysis by metallo-- Wilksch J, Cao H, Haq I-U, Dougan G, Strugnell RA. 2019. Resistance
lactamases. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2008:576297. mechanisms and population structure of highly drug resistant Klebsiella
32. Lisa M-N, Palacios AR, Aitha M, González MM, Moreno DM, Crowder in Pakistan during the introduction of the carbapenemase NDM-1. Sci
MW, Bonomo RA, Spencer J, Tierney DL, Llarrull LI, Vila AJ. 2017. A Rep 9:2392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38943-7.
general reaction mechanism for carbapenem hydrolysis by mononu- 48. Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Mathai D, Bell JM, Jones RN, Mendes RE.
clear and binuclear metallo--lactamases. Nat Commun 8:538. https:// 2011. Early dissemination of NDM-1- and OXA-181-producing Entero-
doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00601-9. bacteriaceae in Indian hospitals: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial
33. Feng H, Liu X, Wang S, Fleming J, Wang D-C, Liu W. 2017. The Surveillance Program, 2006 –2007. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:
mechanism of NDM-1-catalyzed carbapenem hydrolysis is distinct from 1274 –1278. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01497-10.
that of penicillin or cephalosporin hydrolysis. Nat Commun 8:2242. 49. Walsh TR, Weeks J, Livermore DM, Toleman MA. 2011. Dissemination
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02339-w. of NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its
34. Shen B, Yu Y, Chen H, Cao X, Lao X, Fang Y, Shi Y, Chen J, Zheng H. 2013. implications for human health: an environmental point prevalence
Inhibitor discovery of full-length New Delhi metallo--lactamase-1 (NDM- study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473
1). PLoS One 8:e62955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062955. -3099(11)70059-7.
35. Livermore D, Mushtaq S, Warner M, Woodford N. 2015. Activity of 50. Kazi M, Drego L, Nikam C, Ajbani K, Soman R, Shetty A, Rodrigues C.
OP0595/-lactam combinations against Gram-negative bacteria with 2015. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacte-
extended-spectrum, AmpC and carbapenem-hydrolysing -lactamases.
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
riaceae at a tertiary care laboratory in Mumbai. Eur J Clin Microbiol
J Antimicrob Chemother 70:3032–3041. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/ Infect Dis 34:467– 472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2249-x.
dkv239. 51. Garg A, Garg J, Kumar S, Bhattacharya A, Agarwal S, Upadhyay G. 2019.
36. Walsh TR. 2005. The emergence and implications of metallo-- Molecular epidemiology and therapeutic options of carbapenem-
lactamases in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:2–9. resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Indian J Med Res 149:285–289.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01264.x. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_36_18.
37. Makena A, Brem J, Pfeffer I, Geffen REJ, Wilkins SE, Tarhonskaya H, 52. Zhang R, Liu L, Zhou H, Chan EW, Li J, Fang Y, Li Y, Liao K, Chen S. 2017.
Flashman E, Phee LM, Wareham DW, Schofield CJ. 2015. Biochemical Nationwide surveillance of clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacte-
characterization of New Delhi metallo--lactamase variants reveals riaceae (CRE) strains in China. EBioMedicine 19:98 –106. https://doi.org/
differences in protein stability. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:463– 469. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.032.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku403. 53. Cai Y, Chen C, Zhao M, Yu X, Lan K, Liao K, Guo P, Zhang W, Ma X, He
38. Stewart AC, Bethel CR, VanPelt J, Bergstrom A, Cheng Z, Miller CG, Y, Zeng J, Chen L, Jia W, Tang Y-W, Huang B. 2019. High prevalence of
Williams C, Poth R, Morris M, Lahey O, Nix JC, Tierney DL, Page RC, metallo--lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae from three ter-
Crowder MW, Bonomo RA, Fast W. 2017. Clinical variants of New Delhi tiary hospitals in China. Front Microbiol 10:1610. https://doi.org/10
metallo--lactamase are evolving to overcome zinc scarcity. ACS Infect .3389/fmicb.2019.01610.
Dis 3:927–940. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00128. 54. Wang Y, Lo W-U, Lai R-M, Tse C-S, Lee RA, Luk W-K, Cheng V-C, Que T-L,
39. Bahr G, Vitor-Horen L, Bethel CR, Bonomo RA, González LJ, Vila AJ. 2017. Chow K-H, Ho P-L. 2017. IncN ST7 epidemic plasmid carrying blaIMP-4 in
Clinical evolution of New Delhi metallo--lactamase (NDM) optimizes Enterobacteriaceae isolates with epidemiological links to multiple geo-
resistance under Zn(II) deprivation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62: graphical areas in China. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:99 –103. https://
e01849-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01849-17. doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw353.
40. Corbin BD, Seeley EH, Raab A, Feldmann J, Miller MR, Torres VJ, 55. Dong F, Lu J, Wang Y, Shi J, Zhen JH, Chu P, Zhen Y, Han SJ, Guo YL,
Anderson KL, Dattilo BM, Dunman PM, Gerads R, Caprioli RM, Nacken Song WQ. 2017. A five-year surveillance of carbapenemase-producing
W, Chazin WJ, Skaar EP. 2008. Metal chelation and inhibition of bacte- Klebsiella pneumoniae in a pediatric hospital in China reveals increased
rial growth in tissue abscesses. Science 319:962–965. https://doi.org/ predominance of NDM-1. Biomed Environ Sci 30:562–569.
10.1126/science.1152449. 56. Du H, Chen L, Tang Y-W, Kreiswirth BN. 2016. Carbapenem-resistant
41. Cheng Z, Thomas PW, Ju L, Bergstrom A, Mason K, Clayton D, Miller C, and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli co-producing NDM-9 and MCR-1.
Bethel CR, VanPelt J, Tierney DL, Page RC, Bonomo RA, Fast W, Crowder Lancet Infect Dis 16:288 –289.
MW. 2018. Evolution of New Delhi metallo--lactamase (NDM) in the 57. Lutgring JD, Limbago BM. 2016. The problem of carbapenemase-
clinic: effects of NDM mutations on stability, zinc affinity, and mono- producing-carbapenem-resistant-Enterobacteriaceae detection. J Clin
zinc activity. J Biol Chem 293:12606 –12618. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc Microbiol 54:529 –534. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02771-15.
.RA118.003835. 58. Al-Agamy MH, Aljallal A, Radwan HH, Shibl AM. 2018. Characterization
42. Ahammad ZS, Sreekrishnan TR, Hands CL, Knapp CW, Graham DW. of carbapenemases, ESBLs, and plasmid-mediated quinolone determi-
2014. Increased waterborne blaNDM-1 resistance gene abundances as- nants in carbapenem-insensitive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneu-
sociated with seasonal human pilgrimages to the Upper Ganges River. moniae in Riyadh hospitals. J Infect Public Health 11:64 – 68. https://doi
Environ Sci Technol 48:3014 –3020. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405348h. .org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.03.010.
43. van Duin D, Doi Y. 2017. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase- 59. Zowawi HM, Sartor AL, Balkhy HH, Walsh TR, Al Johani SM, AlJindan RY,
producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence 8:460 – 469. https://doi.org/10 Alfaresi M, Ibrahim E, Al-Jardani A, Al-Abri S, Al Salman J, Dashti AA,
.1080/21505594.2016.1222343. Kutbi AH, Schlebusch S, Sidjabat HE, Paterson DL. 2014. Molecular
44. Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, Walsh TR. characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Kleb-
2009. Characterization of a new metallo--lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, siella pneumoniae in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council:
and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic dominance of OXA-48 and NDM producers. Antimicrob Agents Che-
structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Anti- mother 58:3085–3090. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02050-13.
microb Agents Chemother 53:5046 –5054. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC 60. Zowawi HM, Syrmis MW, Kidd TJ, Balkhy HH, Walsh TR, Al Johani SM, Al
.00774-09. Jindan RY, Alfaresi M, Ibrahim E, Al-Jardani A, Al Salman J, Dashti AA,
45. Woodford N, Johnson AP. 2013. Global spread of antibiotic resistance: Sidjabat HE, Baz O, Trembizki E, Whiley DM, Paterson DL. 2018. Iden-
the example of New Delhi metallo--lactamase (NDM)-mediated car- tification of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in selected
bapenem resistance. J Med Microbiol 62:499 –513. https://doi.org/10 hospitals of the Gulf Cooperation Council States: dominance of high-
.1099/jmm.0.052555-0. risk clones in the region. J Med Microbiol 67:846 – 853. https://doi.org/
46. Kumarasamy KK, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, Bagaria J, Butt F, Balakrishnan 10.1099/jmm.0.000730.
R, Chaudhary U, Doumith M, Giske CG, Irfan S, Krishnan P, Kumar AV, 61. Ayoub Moubareck C, Hammoudi Halat D, Akkawi C, Nabi A, AlSharhan
Maharjan S, Mushtaq S, Noorie T, Paterson DL, Pearson A, Perry C, Pike MA, AlDeesi ZO, Peters CC, Celiloglu H, Karam Sarkis D. 2019. Role of
R, Rao B, Ray U, Sarma JB, Sharma M, Sheridan E, Thirunarayan MA, outer membrane permeability, efflux mechanism, and carbapenemases
Turton J, Upadhyay S, Warner M, Welfare W, Livermore DM, Woodford in carbapenem-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Dubai
N. 2010. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, hospitals: results of the first cross-sectional survey. Int J Infect Dis
Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological 84:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.04.027.
study. Lancet Infect Dis 10:597– 602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473 62. Edelstein MV, Skleenova EN, Shevchenko OV, D’souza JW, Tapalski DV,
-3099(10)70143-2. Azizov IS, Sukhorukova MV, Pavlukov RA, Kozlov RS, Toleman MA,
47. Heinz E, Ejaz H, Bartholdson Scott J, Wang N, Gujaran S, Pickard D, Walsh TR. 2013. Spread of extensively resistant VIM-2-positive ST235
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 15
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia: a longitu- Wiuff C, Brown DJ, European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing
dinal epidemiological and clinical study. Lancet Infect Dis 13:867– 876. Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) Working Group. 2017. Occurrence of
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70168-3. carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli
63. Ageevets VA, Partina IV, Lisitsyna ES, Ilina EN, Lobzin YV, Shlyapnikov in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteria-
SA, Sidorenko SV. 2014. Emergence of carbapenemase-producing ceae (EuSCAPE): a prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect Dis
Gram-negative bacteria in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Int J Antimicrob 17:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30257-2.
Agents 44:152–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.05.004. 76. Livermore DM, Walsh TR, Toleman M, Woodford N. 2011. Balkan
64. Lazareva IV, Ageevets VA, Ershova TA, Zueva LP, Goncharov AE, Darina NDM-1: escape or transplant? Lancet Infect Dis 11:164. https://doi.org/
MG, Svetlichnaya YS, Uskov AN, Sidorenko SV. 2016. Prevalence and 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70048-2.
antibiotic resistance of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bac- 77. Little ML, Qin X, Zerr DM, Weissman SJ. 2012. Molecular diversity in
teria in Saint Petersburg and some other regions of the Russian Fed- mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in paediatric Enterobacteriaceae.
eration. Antibiot Khimioter 61:28 –38. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag
65. Fursova NK, Astashkin EI, Knyazeva AI, Kartsev NN, Leonova ES, Ershova .2011.09.014.
ON, Alexandrova IA, Kurdyumova NV, Sazikina SY, Volozhantsev NV, 78. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010. Detection of Enter-
Svetoch EA, Dyatlov IA. 2015. The spread of blaOXA-48 and blaOXA-244 obacteriaceae isolates carrying metallo-beta-lactamase—United States,
carbapenemase genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59:750.
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
and Enterobacter spp. isolated in Moscow, Russia. Ann Clin Microbiol 79. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Notes from the Field:
Antimicrob 14:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0108-y. New Delhi metallo--lactamase–producing Escherichia coli associated
66. Luzzaro F, Docquier J-D, Colinon C, Endimiani A, Lombardi G, Amicosante with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography—Illinois.
G, Rossolini GM, Toniolo A. 2004. Emergence in Klebsiella pneumoniae and MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:1051.
Enterobacter cloacae clinical isolates of the VIM-4 metallo--lactamase 80. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network. 2017. Canadian Public
encoded by a conjugative plasmid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48: Health Laboratory Network (CPHLN) voluntary reporting of
648–650. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.2.648-650.2004. carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaeceae.
67. Hasan CM, Turlej-Rogacka A, Vatopoulos AC, Giakkoupi P, Maâtallah M, 81. Kohler PP, Melano RG, Patel SN, Shafinaz S, Faheem A, Coleman BL, Green
Giske CG. 2014. Dissemination of blaVIM in Greece at the peak of the K, Armstrong I, Almohri H, Borgia S, Borgundvaag E, Johnstone J, Katz K,
epidemic of 2005–2006: clonal expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae Lam F, Muller MP, Powis J, Poutanen SM, Richardson D, Rebbapragada A,
clonal complex 147. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:34 –37. https://doi.org/10 Sarabia A, Simor A, McGeer A, Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network
.1111/1469-0691.12187. (TIBDN). 2018. Emergence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteria-
68. Vatopoulos A. 2008. High rates of metallo--lactamase-producing Kleb- ceae, South-Central Ontario, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 24:1674–1682.
siella pneumoniae in Greece—a review of the current evidence. Euro https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2409.180164.
Surveill 13:8023. 82. Boyd DA, Lisboa LF, Rennie R, Zhanel GG, Dingle TC, Mulvey MR. 2019.
Identification of a novel metallo--lactamase, CAM-1, in clinical Pseu-
69. Giakoupi P, Maltezou H, Polemis M, Pappa O, Saroglou G, Vatopoulos A,
domonas aeruginosa isolates from Canada. J Antimicrob Chemother
Greek System for the Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance. 2009.
74:1563–1567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz066.
KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in Greek hospitals
83. Kazmierczak KM, Rabine S, Hackel M, McLaughlin RE, Biedenbach DJ,
are mainly due to a hyperepidemic clone. Eurosurveillance 14:19218.
Bouchillon SK, Sahm DF, Bradford PA. 2016. Multiyear, multinational
https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.14.21.19218-en.
survey of the incidence and global distribution of metallo--lactamase-
70. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M, Bartzavali C, Lambropoulou A, Solomou A,
producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimi-
Tsiata E, Anastassiou ED, Fligou F, Marangos M, Spiliopoulou I, Christofi-
crob Agents Chemother 60:1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC
dou M. 2019. Reversal of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneu-
.02379-15.
moniae epidemiology from blaKPC to blaVIM harbouring isolates in a
84. Manenzhe RI, Zar HJ, Nicol MP, Kaba M. 2015. The spread of
Greek ICU after introduction of ceftazidime/avibactam. J Antimicrob
carbapenemase-producing bacteria in Africa: a systematic review. J
Chemother 74:2051–2054. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz125.
Antimicrob Chemother 70:23– 40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku356.
71. Public Health England. 2017. English surveillance programme for anti-
85. Rubin JE, Peirano G, Peer AK, Govind CN, Pitout J. 2014. NDM-
microbial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) report 2017. Public Health 1–producing Enterobacteriaceae from South Africa: moving towards
England, London, United Kingdom. endemicity? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79:378 –380. https://doi.org/10
72. Wright LL, Turton JF, Livermore DM, Hopkins KL, Woodford N. 2015. .1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.04.003.
Dominance of international “high-risk clones” among metallo-- 86. Brinkac LM, White R, D’Souza R, Nguyen K, Obaro SK, Fouts DE. 2019.
lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK. J Antimicrob Emergence of New Delhi metallo--lactamase (NDM-5) in Klebsiella
Chemother 70:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku339. quasipneumoniae from neonates in a Nigerian hospital. mSphere
73. Public Health England. 2018. English surveillance programme for anti- 4:e00685-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00685-18.
microbial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) report. Public Health 87. Rao P. 2017. India’s medical tourism gets Africans’ attention. United
England, London, United Kingdom. Nations Africa Renewal blog. https://www.un.org/africarenewal/
74. Albiger B, Glasner C, Struelens MJ, Grundmann H, Monnet DL, European magazine/december-2016-march-2017/india%E2%80%99s-medical
Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) Work- -tourism-gets-africans%E2%80%99-attention. Accessed 28 June 2020.
ing Group. 2015. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in 88. da Silva IR, Aires CAM, Conceição-Neto OC, de Oliveira Santos IC,
Europe: assessment by national experts from 38 countries, May 2015. Euro Ferreira Pereira N, Moreno Senna JP, Carvalho-Assef APD, Asensi MD,
Surveill 20:30062. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.45.30062. Rocha-de-Souza CM. 2019. Distribution of clinical NDM-1-producing
75. Grundmann H, Glasner C, Albiger B, Aanensen DM, Tomlinson CT, Gram-negative bacteria in Brazil. Microb Drug Resist 25:394 –399.
Andrasević AT, Cantón R, Carmeli Y, Friedrich AW, Giske CG, Glupczyn- https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2018.0240.
ski Y, Gniadkowski M, Livermore DM, Nordmann P, Poirel L, Rossolini 89. Zurita J, Parra H, Gestal MC, McDermott J, Barba P. 2015. First case of
GM, Seifert H, Vatopoulos A, Walsh T, Woodford N, Monnet DL, Koraqi NDM-1-producing Providencia rettgeri in Ecuador. J Glob Antimicrob
A, Lacej D, Apfalter P, Hartl R, Glupczynski Y, Huang T-D, Strateva T, Resist 3:302–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2015.07.003.
Marteva-Proevska Y, Andrasevic AT, Butic I, Pieridou-Bagatzouni D, 90. Saavedra-Rojas S-Y, Duarte-Valderrama C, González-de-Arias M-N,
Maikanti-Charalampous P, Hrabak J, Zemlickova H, Hammerum A, Ja- Ovalle-Guerro MV. 2017. Emergence of Providencia rettgeri NDM-1 in
kobsen L, Ivanova M, Pavelkovich A, Jalava J, Österblad M, Dortet L, two departments of Colombia, 2012–2013. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin
Vaux S, Kaase M, Gatermann SG, Vatopoulos A, Tryfinopoulou K, Tóth Á, 35:354 –358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2015.05.011.
Jánvári L, Boo TW, McGrath E, Carmeli Y, Adler A, Pantosti A, Monaco M, 91. Gales AC, Menezes LC, Silbert S, Sader HS. 2003. Dissemination in
Raka L, Kurti A, Balode A, Saule M, Miciuleviciene J, Mierauskaite A, distinct Brazilian regions of an epidemic carbapenem-resistant Pseu-
Perrin-Weniger M, Reichert P, Nestorova N, Debattista S, Mijovic G, domonas aeruginosa producing SPM metallo--lactamase. J Antimicrob
Lopicic M, Samuelsen Ø, Haldorsen B, Zabicka D, Literacka E, Caniça M, Chemother 52:699 –702. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg416.
Manageiro V, Kaftandzieva A, Trajkovska-Dokic E, Damian M, Lixandru 92. Zavascki AP, Barth AL, Gonçalves ALS, Moro ALD, Fernandes JF, Martins
B, Jelesic Z, Trudic A, Niks M, Schreterova E, Pirs M, Cerar T, Oteo J, AF, Ramos F, Goldani LZ. 2006. The influence of metallo--lactamase
Aracil B, Giske C, Sjöström K, Gür D, Cakar A, Woodford N, Hopkins K, production on mortality in nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infec-
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 16
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
tions. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/ negative bacteria in South Africa: a case-control study. PLoS One
dkl239. 10:e0123337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123337.
93. Sidjabat HE, Townell N, Nimmo GR, George NM, Robson J, Vohra R, 110. Freire MP, Abdala E, Moura ML, de Paula FJ, Spadão F, Caiaffa-Filho HH,
Davis L, Heney C, Paterson DL. 2015. Dominance of IMP-4-producing David-Neto E, Nahas WC, Pierrotti LC. 2015. Risk factors and outcome of
Enterobacter cloacae among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteri- infections with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K.
aceae in Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4059 – 4066. pneumoniae in kidney transplant recipients. Infection 43:315–323.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04378-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0743-4.
94. Roberts LW, Catchpoole E, Jennison AV, Bergh H, Hume A, Heney C, 111. Fraenkel-Wandel Y, Raveh-Brawer D, Wiener-Well Y, Yinnon AM, Assous
George N, Paterson DL, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, Harris P. 2020. MV. 2016. Mortality due to blaKPC Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia.
Genomic analysis of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1083–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/
Queensland reveals widespread transmission of blaIMP-4 on an IncHI2 dkv414.
plasmid. Microb Genom 6:e000321. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0 112. Mathur P, Sagar S, Kumar S, Sharma V, Gupta D, Lalwani S, Rani R,
.000321. Muruganantham A. 2016. Does the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae
95. Abraham S, O’Dea M, Trott DJ, Abraham RJ, Hughes D, Pang S, McKew carbapenemase and New Delhi metallo--lactamase-1 genes in patho-
G, Cheong EYL, Merlino J, Saputra S, Malik R, Gottlieb T. 2016. Isolation gens lead to fatal outcome? Indian J Med Microbiol 34:495– 499.
and plasmid characterization of carbapenemase (IMP-4) producing https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.195367.
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
Salmonella enterica Typhimurium from cats. Sci Rep 6:35527. https:// 113. van Duin D, Kaye KS, Neuner EA, Bonomo RA. 2013. Carbapenem-resistant
doi.org/10.1038/srep35527. Enterobacteriaceae: a review of treatment and outcomes. Diagn Microbiol
96. Dolejska M, Masarikova M, Dobiasova H, Jamborova I, Karpiskova R, Infect Dis 75:115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.11.009.
Havlicek M, Carlile N, Priddel D, Cizek A, Literak I. 2016. High prevalence 114. Daikos GL, Petrikkos P, Psichogiou M, Kosmidis C, Vryonis E, Skoutelis A,
of Salmonella and IMP-4-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the silver gull Georgousi K, Tzouvelekis LS, Tassios PT, Bamia C, Petrikkos G. 2009.
on Five Islands, Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:63–70. https:// Prospective observational study of the impact of VIM-1 metallo--
doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv306. lactamase on the outcome of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae
97. Lim HM, Pène JJ, Shaw RW. 1988. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1868 –1873.
expression of the Bacillus cereus 5/B/6 -lactamase II structural gene. J https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00782-08.
Bacteriol 170:2873–2878. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.6.2873-2878.1988. 115. Daikos GL, Kosmidis C, Tassios PT, Petrikkos G, Vasilakopoulou A,
98. Kuwabara S, Abraham EP. 1967. Some properties of two extracellular Psychogiou M, Stefanou I, Avlami A, Katsilambros N. 2007. Enterobac-
-lactamases from Bacillus cereus 569/H. Biochem J 103:27C–30C. teriaceae bloodstream infections: presence of integrons, risk factors,
https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1030027c. and outcome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:2366 –2372. https://
99. Hawkey PM, Warren RE, Livermore DM, McNulty CAM, Enoch DA, Otter doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00044-07.
JA, Wilson A. 2018. Treatment of infections caused by multidrug- 116. Huang S, Dai W, Sun S, Zhang X, Zhang L. 2012. Prevalence of plasmid-
mediated quinolone resistance and aminoglycoside resistance deter-
resistant Gram-negative bacteria: report of the British Society for An-
minants among carbapeneme [sic] non-susceptible Enterobacter cloa-
timicrobial Chemotherapy/Healthcare Infection Society/British Infec-
cae. PLoS One 7:e47636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047636.
tion Association Joint Working Party. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:
117. Rodríguez-Baño J, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A. 2018.
iii2–iii78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky027.
Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum--lactamase-,
100. Jeon YD, Jeong WY, Kim MH, Jung IY, Ahn MY, Ann HW, Ahn JY, Han SH,
AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Micro-
Choi JY, Song YG, Kim JM, Ku NS. 2016. Risk factors for mortality in
biol Rev 31:e00079-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00079-17.
patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. Medicine (Bal-
118. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Salamanca E, de Cueto M, Hsueh P-R, Viale P,
timore) 95:e4375. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004375.
Paño-Pardo JR, Venditti M, Tumbarello M, Daikos G, Cantón R, Doi Y,
101. Senol E, DesJardin J, Stark PC, Barefoot L, Snydman DR. 2002. Attrib-
Tuon FF, Karaiskos I, Pérez-Nadales E, Schwaber MJ, Azap ÖK, Souli
utable mortality of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. Clin In-
M, Roilides E, Pournaras S, Akova M, Pérez F, Bermejo J, Oliver A,
fect Dis 34:1653–1656. https://doi.org/10.1086/340707.
Almela M, Lowman W, Almirante B, Bonomo RA, Carmeli Y, Paterson
102. Asempa TE, Abdelraouf K, Nicolau DP. 2020. Metallo--lactamase resis-
DL, Pascual A, Rodríguez-Baño J, del Toro MD, Gálvez J, Falcone M,
tance in Enterobacteriaceae is an artefact of currently utilized antimi- Russo A, Giamarellou H, Trecarichi EM, Losito AR, García-Vázquez E,
crobial susceptibility testing methods. J Antimicrob Chemother 75: Hernández A, Gómez J, Bou G, Iosifidis E, Prim N, Navarro F, Mirelis
997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz532. B, Skiada A, Origüen J, Juan RS, Fernández-Ruiz M, Larrosa N,
103. Gammoh NZ, Rink L. 2017. Zinc in infection and inflammation. Nutri- PuigAsensio M, Cisneros JM, Molina J, González V, Rucci V, de
ents 9:624. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9060624. Gopegui ER, Marinescu CI, Martínez-Martínez L, Fariñas MC, Cano
104. González LJ, Bahr G, Nakashige TG, Nolan EM, Bonomo RA, Vila AJ. ME, Gozalo M, Mora-Rillo M, Francisco C-S, Peña C, Gómez-Zorrilla S,
2016. Membrane anchoring stabilizes and favors secretion of New Tubau F, Tsakris A, Zarkotou O, Antoniadou A, Poulakou G, Pitout J,
Delhi metallo--lactamase. Nat Chem Biol 12:516 –522. https://doi.org/ Virmani D, Torre-Cisneros J, Guzmán-Puche J, Helvaci Ö, Sahin AO,
10.1038/nchembio.2083. Pintado V, Ruiz P, Bartoletti M, Giannella M, Tacconelli E, Riemen-
105. Monogue ML, Abbo LM, Rosa R, Camargo JF, Martinez O, Bonomo RA, schneider F, Calbo E, Badia C, Xercavins M, Gasch O, Fontanals D,
Nicolau DP. 2017. In vitro discordance with in vivo activity: humanized Jové E. 2017. Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality
exposures of ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam, and tigecycline alone and of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-
in combination against New Delhi metallo--lactamase-producing Kleb- producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort
siella pneumoniae in a murine lung infection model. Antimicrob Agents study. Lancet Infect Dis 17:726 –734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473
Chemother 61:e00486-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00486-17. -3099(17)30228-1.
106. Chibabhai V, Nana T, Bosman N, Thomas T, Lowman W. 2018. Were all 119. Daikos GL, Tsaousi S, Tzouvelekis LS, Anyfantis I, Psichogiou M, Argy-
carbapenemases created equal? Treatment of NDM-producing exten- ropoulou A, Stefanou I, Sypsa V, Miriagou V, Nepka M, Georgiadou S,
sively drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a case report and literature Markogiannakis A, Goukos D, Skoutelis A. 2014. Carbapenemase-
review. Infection 46:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-017-1070-8. producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: lowering
107. Naim H, Rizvi M, Azam M, Gupta R, Taneja N, Shukla I, Khan H. 2017. mortality by antibiotic combination schemes and the role of carbap-
Alarming emergence, molecular characterization, and outcome of enems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:2322–2328. https://doi.org/
blaNDM-1 in patients infected with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative 10.1128/AAC.02166-13.
bacilli in a tertiary care hospital. J Lab Physicians 9:170 –176. https:// 120. van Duin D, Lok JJ, Earley M, Cober E, Richter SS, Perez F, Salata RA,
doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.208264. Kalayjian RC, Watkins RR, Doi Y, Kaye KS, Fowler VG, Paterson DL,
108. Datta S, Roy S, Chatterjee S, Saha A, Sen B, Pal T, Som T, Basu S. 2014. Bonomo RA, Evans S, Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group. 2018.
A five-year experience of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae Colistin versus ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of infections
causing neonatal septicaemia: predominance of NDM-1. PLoS One due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis 66:
9:e112101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112101. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix783.
109. de Jager P, Chirwa T, Naidoo S, Perovic O, Thomas J. 2015. Nosocomial 121. Otter JA, Doumith M, Davies F, Mookerjee S, Dyakova E, Gilchrist M,
outbreak of New Delhi metallo--lactamase-1-producing Gram- Brannigan ET, Bamford K, Galletly T, Donaldson H, Aanensen DM,
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 17
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Ellington MJ, Hill R, Turton JF, Hopkins KL, Woodford N, Holmes A. 2017. negative bacteria. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03580044. Ac-
Emergence and clonal spread of colistin resistance due to multiple cessed 20 June 2020.
mutational mechanisms in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneu- 136. Ehmann DE, Jahić H, Ross PL, Gu R-F, Hu J, Kern G, Walkup GK, Fisher
moniae in London. Sci Rep 7:12711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017 SL. 2012. Avibactam is a covalent, reversible, non--lactam -lactamase
-12637-4. inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:11663–11668. https://doi.org/
122. Kanwar A, Marshall SH, Perez F, Tomas M, Jacobs MR, Hujer AM, 10.1073/pnas.1205073109.
Domitrovic TN, Rudin SD, Rojas LJ, Kreiswirth BN, Chen L, Quinones- 137. Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M, Zhang J, Maharjan S, Doumith M,
Mateu M, van Duin D, Bonomo RA, Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Woodford N. 2011. Activity of MK-7655 combined with imipenem
Group. 2018. Emergence of resistance to colistin during the treatment against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob
of bloodstream infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae Agents Chemother 55:390 –394. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00756-10.
carbapenemase–producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Open Forum Infect 138. Sader HS, Mendes RE, Pfaller MA, Shortridge D, Flamm RK, Castanheira
Dis 5:ofy054. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy054. M. 2017. Antimicrobial activities of aztreonam-avibactam and compar-
123. Lutgring JD, Balbuena R, Reese N, Gilbert SE, Ansari U, Bhatnagar A, ator agents against contemporary (2016) clinical Enterobacteriaceae
Boyd S, Campbell D, Cochran J, Haynie J, Ilutsik J, Longo C, Swint S, isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01856-17. https://doi.org/
Rasheed JK, Brown AC, Karlsson M. 2020. Antibiotic susceptibility of 10.1128/AAC.01856-17.
NDM-producing Enterobacterales collected in the United States, 139. Gregory S, Paul N, Leanne G, Helen B, Angela W, Katrina Y, Chen Z, Jie
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
2017–2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. S, Chow J. 2018. Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR
124. Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M, Woodford N. June 2016. In vitro Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: pooled data from
activity of eravacycline against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteria- the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme. J Antimi-
ceae and Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother crob Chemother 73:2519 –2523. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky204.
60:3840 –3844. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00436-16. 140. Wenzler E, Deraedt MF, Harrington AT, Danizger LH. 2017. Synergistic
125. Gallagher JC. 2019. Omadacycline: a modernized tetracycline. Clin activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam against serine and
Infect Dis 69:S1–S5. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz394. metallo--lactamase-producing gram-negative pathogens. Diagn Mi-
126. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2010. FDA Drug Safety crobiol Infect Dis 88:352–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio
Communication: Increased risk of death with Tygacil (tigecycline) .2017.05.009.
compared to other antibiotics used to treat similar infections. 141. NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service. Cefiderocol. https://www.sps.nhs.uk/
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug medicines/cefiderocol/. Accessed 20 June 2020.
-safety-communication-increased-risk-death-tygacil-tigecycline 142. Avery LM, Nicolau DP. 2018. Investigational drugs for the treatment of
-compared-other-antibiotics. Accessed 17 February 2020. infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Ex-
127. Marquez-Ortiz RA, Haggerty L, Olarte N, Duarte C, Garza-Ramos U, pert Opin Invest Drugs 27:325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784
Silva-Sanchez J, Castro BE, Sim EM, Beltran M, Moncada MV, Valderrama .2018.1460354.
A, Castellanos JE, Charles IG, Vanegas N, Escobar-Perez J, Petty NK.
143. Portsmouth S, van Veenhuyzen D, Echols R, Machida M, Ferreira JCA,
2017. Genomic epidemiology of NDM-1-encoding plasmids in Latin
Ariyasu M, Tenke P, Nagata TD. 2018. Cefiderocol versus imipenem-
American clinical isolates reveals insights into the evolution of multi-
cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections
drug resistance. Genome Biol Evol 9:1725–1741. https://doi.org/10
caused by Gram-negative uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised,
.1093/gbe/evx115.
double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 18:1319 –1328.
128. Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. 2013. Human simulated studies of aztreonam
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30554-1.
and aztreonam-avibactam to evaluate activity against challenging
144. Kohira N, West J, Ito A, Ito-Horiyama T, Nakamura R, Sato T, Rittenhouse
gram-negative organisms, including metallo--lactamase producers.
S, Tsuji M, Yamano Y. 2016. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a sidero-
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3299 –3306. https://doi.org/10.1128/
phore cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae clinical iso-
AAC.01989-12.
lates, including carbapenem-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Che-
129. Shaw E, Rombauts A, Tubau F, Padullés A, Càmara J, Lozano T, Cobo-
mother 60:729 –734. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01695-15.
Sacristán S, Sabe N, Grau I, Rigo-Bonnin R, Dominguez MA, Carratalà J.
145. Saisho Y, Katsube T, White S, Fukase H, Shimada J. 2018. Pharma-
2018. Clinical outcomes after combination treatment with ceftazidime/
avibactam and aztreonam for NDM-1/OXA-48/CTX-M-15-producing cokinetics, safety, and tolerability of cefiderocol, a novel sidero-
Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 73: phore cephalosporin for Gram-negative bacteria, in healthy sub-
1104 –1106. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx496. jects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02163-17. https://doi.org/
130. Davido B, Fellous L, Lawrence C, Maxime V, Rottman M, Dinh A. 2017. 10.1128/AAC.02163-17.
Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam, an interesting strategy to over- 146. Mushtaq S, Sadouki Z, Vickers A, Livermore D, Woodford N. 2020.
come -lactam resistance conferred by metallo--lactamases in Enter- In-vitro activity of cefiderocol against multidrug-resistant Enterobacte-
obacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Che- rales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates
mother 61:e01008-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01008-17. from the UK Access Microbiol 2:50.
131. Kaye KS, Rice LB, Dane AL, Stus V, Sagan O, Fedosiuk E, Das AF, 147. Matsumoto S, Singley CM, Hoover J, Nakamura R, Echols R, Rittenhouse
Skarinsky D, Eckburg PB, Ellis-Grosse EJ. 2019. Fosfomycin for injection S, Tsuji M, Yamano Y. 2017. Efficacy of cefiderocol against carbapenem-
(ZTI-01) versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of compli- resistant Gram-negative bacilli in immunocompetent-rat respiratory
cated urinary tract infection including acute pyelonephritis: ZEUS, a tract infection models recreating human plasma pharmacokinetics.
phase 2/3 randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis 69:2045–2056. https://doi Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00700-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/
.org/10.1093/cid/ciz181. AAC.00700-17.
132. Demir T, Buyukguclu T. 2017. Fosfomycin: in vitro efficacy against 148. Nakamura R, Ito-Horiyama T, Takemura M, Toba S, Matsumoto S, Ike-
multidrug-resistant isolates beyond urinary isolates. J Glob Antimicrob hara T, Tsuji M, Sato T, Yamano Y. 2019. In vivo pharmacodynamic
Resist 8:164 –168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2016.11.011. study of cefiderocol, a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin, in
133. Albiero J, Mazucheli J, Barros JP, dos R, Szczerepa MM, dos A, Nishiyama murine thigh and lung infection models. Antimicrob Agents Che-
SAB, Carrara-Marroni FE, Sy S, Fidler M, Sy SKB, Tognim M. 2019. mother 63:e02031-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02031-18.
Pharmacodynamic attainment of the synergism of meropenem and 149. Katsube T, Wajima T, Ishibashi T, Arjona Ferreira JC, Echols R. 2017.
fosfomycin combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation of
metallo--lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00126-19. cefiderocol, a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin, for dose adjust-
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00126-19. ment based on renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:
134. Pharmaceutical Technology. 2016. Allergan and AstraZeneca to de- e01381-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01381-16.
velop ATM-AVI for antibiotic-resistant gram-negative infections. Pharm 150. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Clinical study of S-649266 for the
Technol. https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/ treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-negative patho-
newsallergan-astrazeneca-develop-atm-avi-antibiotic-resistant-gram gens (APEKS-NP). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03032380/. Ac-
-negative-infections-4797880/. Accessed 20 February 2020. cessed 13 February 2020.
135. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ATM- 151. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Study of S-649266 or best available
AVI in the treatment of serious infection due to MBL-producing Gram- therapy for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 18
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
resistant Gram-negative pathogens. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ serine and metallo--lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:
NCT02714595. e00130-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00130-20.
152. FDA. 2019. FDA Briefing Document: cefiderocol injection. https://www 167. Rubio-Aparicio D, Nelson K, Griffith D, Dudley MN, Lomovskaya O. 2019.
.fda.gov/media/131703/download. Accessed 13 February 2020. QPX7228 in vitro activity in combination with oral -lactam antibiotics
153. Reck F, Bermingham A, Blais J, Capka V, Cariaga T, Casarez A, Colvin R, against Enterobacteriaceae (ENT), abstr AAR-710. ASM Microbe, 20 to
Dean CR, Fekete A, Gong W, Growcott E, Guo H, Jones AK, Li C, Li F, Lin 24 June 2019, San Francisco, CA.
X, Lindvall M, Lopez S, McKenney D, Metzger L, Moser HE, Prathapam 168. Büttner D, Kramer JS, Klingler F-M, Wittmann SK, Hartmann MR, Kurz CG,
R, Rasper D, Rudewicz P, Sethuraman V, Shen X, Shaul J, Simmons RL, Kohnhäuser D, Weizel L, Brüggerhoff A, Frank D, Steinhilber D, Wichelhaus
Tashiro K, Tang D, Tjandra M, Turner N, Uehara T, Vitt C, Whitebread S, TA, Pogoryelov D, Proschak E. 2018. Challenges in the development of a
Yifru A, Zang X, Zhu Q. 2018. Optimization of novel monobactams with thiol-based broad-spectrum inhibitor for metallo--lactamases. ACS Infect
activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae— Dis 4:360–372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00129.
identification of LYS228. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 28:748 –755. https:// 169. Hammond GG, Huber JL, Greenlee ML, Laub JB, Young K, Silver LL,
doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.01.006. Balkovec JM, Pryor KD, Wu JK, Leiting B, Pompliano DL, Toney JH. 1999.
154. Blais J, Lopez S, Li C, Ruzin A, Ranjitkar S, Dean CR, Leeds JA, Casarez A, Inhibition of IMP-1 metallo--lactamases and sensitization of IMP-1-
Simmons RL, Reck F. 2018. In vitro activity of LYS228, a novel mono- producing bacteria by thioester derivatives. FEMS Microbiol Lett 179:
bactam antibiotic, against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Ant- 289 –296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08740.x.
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
microb Agents Chemother 62:e00552-18. https://doi.org/10.1138/AAC 170. Brem J, van Berkel SS, Zollman D, Lee SY, Gileadi O, McHugh PJ, Walsh
.00552-18. TR, McDonough MA, Schofield CJ. 2016. Structural basis of metallo--
155. Dean CR, Barkan DT, Bermingham A, Blais J, Casey F, Casarez A, Colvin lactamase inhibition by captopril stereoisomers. Antimicrob Agents
R, Fuller J, Jones AK, Li C, Lopez S, Metzger LE, Mostafavi M, Prathapam Chemother 60:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01335-15.
R, Rasper D, Reck F, Ruzin A, Shaul J, Shen X, Simmons RL, Skewes-Cox 171. Tehrani K, Martin NI. 2017. Thiol-containing metallo--lactamase inhibitors
P, Takeoka KT, Tamrakar P, Uehara T, Wei J-R. 2018. Mode of action of resensitize resistant Gram-negative bacteria to meropenem. ACS Infect Dis
the monobactam LYS228 and mechanisms decreasing in vitro suscep- 3:711–717. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00094.
tibility in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents 172. González MM, Kosmopoulou M, Mojica MF, Castillo V, Hinchliffe P,
Chemother 62:e01200-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01200-18. Pettinati I, Brem J, Schofield CJ, Mahler G, Bonomo RA, Llarrull LI,
156. Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M, Vickers A, Woodford N. 2017. In Spencer J, Vila AJ. 2015. Bisthiazolidines: a substrate-mimicking scaffold
vitro activity of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) against Gram- as an inhibitor of the NDM-1 carbapenemase. ACS Infect Dis 1:544 –554.
negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1373–1385. https://doi https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00046.
.org/10.1093/jac/dkw593. 173. Hinchliffe P, González MM, Mojica MF, González JM, Castillo V, Saiz C,
157. Mushtaq S, Vickers A, Woodford N, Haldimann A, Livermore DM. 2019. Kosmopoulou M, Tooke CL, Llarrull LI, Mahler G, Bonomo RA, Vila AJ,
Activity of nacubactam (RG6080/OP0595) combinations against MBL- Spencer J. 2016. Cross-class metallo--lactamase inhibition by bisthia-
producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:953–960.
zolidines reveals multiple binding modes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky522.
113:E3745–E3754. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601368113.
158. Moya B, Barcelo IM, Bhagwat S, Patel M, Bou G, Papp-Wallace KM,
174. Lambert RJW, Hanlon GW, Denyer SP. 2004. The synergistic effect of
Bonomo RA, Oliver A. 2017. WCK 5107 (Zidebactam) and WCK 5153 are
EDTA/antimicrobial combinations on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Appl
novel inhibitors of PBP2 showing potent “-lactam enhancer” activity
Microbiol 96:244–253. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2004.02135.x.
against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including multidrug-resistant
175. Vaara M. 1992. Agents that increase the permeability of the outer
metallo--lactamase-producing high-risk clones. Antimicrob Agents
membrane. Microbiol Rev 56:395– 411. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR
Chemother 61:e02529-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02529-16.
.56.3.395-411.1992.
159. Doumith M, Mushtaq S, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2016. New insights
176. Aoki N, Ishii Y, Tateda K, Saga T, Kimura S, Kikuchi Y, Kobayashi T,
into the regulatory pathways associated with the activation of the
Tanabe Y, Tsukada H, Gejyo F, Yamaguchi K. 2010. Efficacy of calcium-
stringent response in bacterial resistance to the PBP2-targeted antibi-
EDTA as an inhibitor for metallo--lactamase in a mouse model of
otics, mecillinam and OP0595/RG6080. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2810 –2814. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw230.
160. Wockhardt Ltd. 2019. Wockhardt Annual Report 2018 –2019. Wock- 54:4582– 4588. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00511-10.
hardt Ltd., Mumbai, India. 177. Yoshizumi A, Ishii Y, Kimura S, Saga T, Harada S, Yamaguchi K,
161. Cahill ST, Cain R, Wang DY, Lohans CT, Wareham DW, Oswin HP, Tateda K, Livermore DM, Woodford N, Livermore DM. 2013. Effica-
Mohammed J, Spencer J, Fishwick CWG, Mcdonough MA, Schofield CJ, cies of calcium–EDTA in combination with imipenem in a murine
Brem J. 2017. Cyclic boronates inhibit all classes of -lactamases. model of sepsis caused by Escherichia coli with NDM-1 -lactamase.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02260-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/ J Infect Chemother 19:992–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-012
AAC.02260-16. -0528-y.
162. Brem J, Cain R, Cahill S, McDonough MA, Clifton IJ, Jiménez-Castellanos 178. Patil UN, Jambulingappa KL. 2015. A combination strategy of ceftriax-
J-C, Avison MB, Spencer J, Fishwick CWG, Schofield CJ. 2016. Structural one, sulbactam and disodium edetate for the treatment of multi-drug
basis of metallo--lactamase, serine--lactamase and penicillin-binding resistant (MDR) septicaemia: a retrospective, observational study in
protein inhibition by cyclic boronates. Nat Commun 7:12406. https:// Indian tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 9:FC29 –FC32. https://doi
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12406. .org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/14129.6840.
163. Lomovskaya O, Dongxu S, Rubio-Aparicio D, Nelson K, Tsivkovski R, 179. Chaudhary M, Mir MA, Ayub S. 2017. Safety and efficacy of a novel
Griffith DC, Dudley MN. 2017. Vaborbactam: spectrum of -lactamase drug elores (ceftriaxone ⫹ sulbactam ⫹ disodium edetate) in the
inhibition and impact of resistance mechanisms on activity in Entero- management of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections in tertiary
bacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01443-17. https://doi care centers: a post-marketing surveillance study. Braz J Infect Dis
.org/10.1128/AAC.01443-17. 21:408 – 417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2017.02.007.
164. Geibel B, Dowell J, Dickerson D, Henkel T. 2018. A randomized, 180. U.S. Department of Health & Human Sciences. 2019. Code of Federal
double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and pharma- Regulations Title 21. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/
cokinetics of single and repeat doses of VNRX-5133 in healthy cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr⫽73.2120. Accessed 24 June 2020.
subjects. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:S431–S431. https://doi.org/10 181. Graceway Pharmaceuticals. 2009. Calcium disodium versenate: NDA
.1093/ofid/ofy210.1232. 8 –922/S-016. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/
165. Daigle D, Hamrick J, Chatwin C, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth BN, Shields RK, 2009/008922s016lbl.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2020.
Oliver A, Clancy CJ, Nguyen M-H, Pevear D, Xerri L. 2018. 1370. 182. Haenni AL, Robert M, Vetter W, Roux L, Barbier M, Lederer E. 1965.
Cefepime/VNRX-5133 broad-spectrum activity is maintained against Structure chimique des aspergillomarasmines A et B. Helv Chim Acta
emerging KPC- and PDC-variants in multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae 48:729 –750. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19650480409.
and P. aeruginosa. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:S419 –S420. https://doi.org/ 183. Bergstrom A, Katko A, Adkins Z, Hill J, Cheng Z, Burnett M, Yang H,
10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1201. Aitha M, Mehaffey MR, Brodbelt JS, Tehrani K, Martin NI, Bonomo RA,
166. Tsivkovski R, Totrov M, Lomovskaya O. 2020. Biochemical characteriza- Page RC, Tierney DL, Fast W, Wright GD, Crowder MW. 2018. Probing
tion of QPX7728, a new ultrabroad-spectrum -lactamase inhibitor of the interaction of aspergillomarasmine A (AMA) with metallo--
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 19
Minireview Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
lactamases NDM-1, VIM-2, and IMP-7. ACS Infect Dis 4:135–145. https:// 188. MacVane SH, Crandon JL, Nichols WW, Nicolau DP. 2014. Unexpected in
doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00106. vivo activity of ceftazidime alone and in combination with avibactam
184. King AM, Reid-Yu SA, Wang W, King DT, De Pascale G, Strynadka NC, against New Delhi metallo--lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Walsh TR, Coombes BK, Wright GD. 2014. Aspergillomarasmine A over- in a murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
comes metallo--lactamase antibiotic resistance. Nature 510:503–506. 58:7007–7009. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02662-14.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13445. 189. Leiris S, Coelho A, Castandet J, Bayet M, Lozano C, Bougnon J, Bousquet
185. VenatoRx Pharmaceuticals. 2019. Venatorx Pharmaceuticals to present J, Everett M, Lemonnier M, Sprynski N, Zalacain M, Pallin TD, Cramp MC,
data for its injectable and orally bioavailable beta-lactamase inhibitor Jennings N, Raphy G, Jones MW, Pattipati R, Shankar B, Sivasubrah-
drug candidates at ECCMID 2019. https://www.venatorx.com/press manyam R, Soodhagani AK, Juventhala RR, Pottabathini N, Pothukanuri
-releases/venatorx-pharmaceuticals-to-present-data-for-its-injectable S, Benvenuti M, Pozzi C, Mangani S, De Luca F, Cerboni G, Docquier J-D,
-and-orally-bioavailable-beta-lactamase-inhibitor-drug-candidates-at Davies DT. 2019. SAR studies leading to the identification of a novel
-eccmid-2019. Accessed 9 February 2020. series of metallo-  -lactamase inhibitors for the treatment of
186. Ghazi IM, Crandon JL, Lesho EP, McGann P, Nicolau DP. 2015. Efficacy carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections that display effi-
of humanized high-dose meropenem, cefepime, and levofloxacin cacy in an animal infection model. ACS Infect Dis 5:131–140. https://
against Enterobacteriaceae isolates producing Verona integron- doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00246.
encoded metallo--lactamase (VIM) in a murine thigh infection model. 190. Everett M, Sprynski N, Coelho A, Castandet J, Bayet M, Bougnon J,
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7145–7147. https://doi.org/10.1128/ Lozano C, Davies DT, Leiris S, Zalacain M, Morrissey I, Magnet S, Holden
Downloaded from http://aac.asm.org/ on March 22, 2021 by guest
AAC.00794-15. K, Warn P, De Luca F, Docquier J-D, Lemonnier M. 2018. Discovery of
187. Wiskirchen DE, Nordmann P, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. 2014. In vivo efficacy a novel metallo--lactamase inhibitor that potentiates meropenem
of human simulated regimens of carbapenems and comparator agents activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimi-
against NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Che- crob Agents Chemother 62:e00074-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC
mother 58:1671–1677. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01946-13. .00074-18.
October 2020 Volume 64 Issue 10 e00397-20 aac.asm.org 20