Optimising Product Enhancements Strategic

Approaches to Managing Complexity

Chethan Sriharsha Moore, Suneel Babu Boppana, Varun

Bodepudi, Krishna Madhav Jha, Srinivasa Rao Maka, Gangadhar
Sadaram
American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

Optimising Product Enhancements Strategic Approaches to

Managing Complexity

Chethan Sriharsha Moore1*, Suneel Babu Boppana2, Varun

Bodepudi3, Krishna Madhav Jha4, Srinivasa Rao Maka5, Gangadhar
Sadaram6
1
Impetus Technologies, Sr Software Engineer
2
iSite Technologies, Project Manager
3
Applab Systems Inc, Computer Programmer
4
Topbuild Corp, Sr Business Analyst
5
North Star Group Inc, Software Engineer
6
Bank of America, DevOps/ OpenShift Admin Engineer

Article history
Submitted 12.10.2021 Revised Version Received 07.11.2021 Accepted 03.12.2021

ABSTRACT
Purpose: This paper examines the strategic alongside market trend analysis while
importance of product enhancements in exploring advanced technologies to tackle
competitive global markets. This research these challenges in the delivery sector.
addresses the dual characteristics of product Findings: Enhancements drive
enhancement strategies by examining their competitiveness, but complexities arise from
incremental and transformational aspects. rapid technology changes and demands. Tools
This research explores challenges because like Agile and modular design improve
product development complexity increases processes, while customer insights foster
due to advancing technology and pressing innovation. Recommendations: Adopt Agile
stakeholder needs along with reducing and PLM tools, leverage modular design, use
product lifespan durations. customer feedback, and invest in sustainable,
Materials and Methods: The paper takes a technology-driven solutions to balance
conceptual approach, analyzing complexities innovation with efficiency.
in product development and reviewing tools Keywords: Product Enhancement,
such as Agile methodologies, PLM systems, Managing Complexity, Product
modular design, and additive manufacturing. Development, Agile methodologies, Product
The study investigates customer insights strategy

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 52 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

INTRODUCTION
Today’s cutthroat global markets and ever-increasing change, more so in the current centralised
economy, product improvements cannot be termed as mere by products but rather as a major
strategic imperative for any firm. Ongoing enhancement of product attributes, their functions
and effectiveness help to meet customer needs and expectations, maintain product market
standing and respond to new opportunities. However, the process of optimisation of products is
becoming more complicated because of integration of the modern initiatory technologies,
multifaceted demands of stakeholders, and the reduced product cycle.
This highlights the complexity is not only a technical challenge but also a significant operational
and managerial issue in the product development (PD) process. Every stage in a product’s life
cycle design, development, and implementation introduces new sources of supply chain
dependency, amplifying complexity[1]. If left unmanaged, these factors appear as increased
costs, extended schedules, decreased employee throughput, and possible quality issues in the
product. To overcome these difficulties, managers should use tactical management techniques
that accommodate the requirement for innovation and the necessity for reasonable complexity
control.

Figure 1 Five Phases of Product Strategy

Strategic frameworks are essential in navigating these challenges. For instance, frameworks like
Agile, Lean and others, together with other practices like business intelligence, can be very
beneficial for product development. AI digital twin and simulation technologies represent
additional approaches through which complications can be handled effectively while
optimization performance improves. These approaches help firms to create a match between
product strategies and business goals and objectives, control risks, and increase productivity[2].
A. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Product Enhancement
The following areas are help to product enhancement with artificial intelligence technology:
• Predictive Analytics: Through analysis of broad datasets AI enables accurate predictions
about forthcoming market dynamics and user interactions and product challenges [3]. The
process generates better quality decisions regarding product feature development along
with improvements. Recommendation engines driven by AI technology use user responses
and historical learning to design products whose features evolve in sync with market
requirements.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 53 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

• Automated Design Optimization: AI system automation carries out repetitive design

procedures including material selection and design validation while producing multiple
design solution options. The integration of AI in design tasks lowers human mistakes while
speeding up design durations and enhancing product modeling precision[4]. Activities
Outside Commercial Settings demonstrate how AI-driven generative design tools assist
engineers at Autodesk and other organizations to optimize products for automotive and
aerospace applications.
• AI in Quality Control: AI systems operate in real time to find deviations and detect
manufacturing process defects in a constantly active monitoring system. Continuous quality
control procedure improvement is enabled by machine learning algorithms which ensures
products meet higher consistency standards[5]. BMW along with Tesla implements AI-
based quality assurance systems at their manufacturing lines both to boost product quality
standards and reduce production errors.
B. Digital Twins in Product Enhancement
The following areas are help to product enhancement with artificial intelligence technology:
• Real-Time Monitoring and Simulation: The technology of Digital Twin creates virtual
duplicates that mirror physical products and process elements and systems. Through digital
twins businesses can replicate real-world functioning and track product performance all
through the lifecycle [6]. The system enables producers to find data-driven solutions that
enable them to foresee possible issues or containment areas. Digital twins from General
Electric (GE) track turbine operation in real-time which helps maintain optimal
performance while blocking costly equipment breakdowns.
• Predictive Maintenance: The integration of Digital Twins helps organizations make
performance predictions about products and systems using current operational data
combined with accumulated historical information. The envisioned benefits extend to
safety-critical sectors such as aerospace and automotive because product failure
consequences become significant[7]v. The aircraft engine maintenance predictions of
Rolls-Royce benefit from Digital Twin technology which optimizes operational efficiency
by minimizing downtime.
• Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): Through the integration of Digital Twin technology
with PLM systems companies track their products through their entire lifecycle while
maintaining operational performance alignment throughout[8]. Product design benefits
from ongoing feedback loops and refinements made possible by integration between these
databases throughout the product lifecycle.
The integration of these technologies allows organizations to handle rising product development
complexities allowing them to deliver innovative competitive products. Together AI systems
and Digital Twins create a full portrait of product development activities to help companies
improve their planning and operational flow and product reliability.
The review paper explores optimal product design practices and complexity minimization
strategies based on general knowledge, prior research, and effective practices from diverse
fields. It aims to present a clear model for how firms can design and enhance their offerings
while navigating the complex development processes of the twenty-first century[9]. The
theoretical part of the paper outlines the concept of complexity in product development, reviews
strategies for addressing it, and overviews tools and techniques for improving product
optimisation.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 54 Moore et al. (2021)

 American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

i. Motivation of the Study

Thus, it is clear that the continual increase in product differentiation and proliferation of
technological features in products now in the market and issues of consumer satisfaction call for
effective, innovative strategies. Thus, the purpose of this research is to identify such best
practices in the enhancement logic for complex products that will allow the organisation to grow
sustainably within the current complex and competitive environment.
ii. Structure of the Paper
The paper is structured as follows: Section II explains product enhancements, including their
types and challenges. Section III addresses managing complexity in product development,
covering dimensions, sources, and frameworks. Section IV explores tools and techniques for
optimising product development, such as agile methodologies and PLM tools. Section V
outlines strategic approaches, focusing on customer needs, market trends, and leveraging
technology. Important conclusions and areas for further study are presented in Section VI.
Understanding Product Enhancements
The practice of significantly enhancing a product to raise its value, usefulness, or functionality
for end customers is known as "product enhancement." That's the tactic companies use to hold
on to current clients, draw in new ones, and maintain market dominance [10]. Improving
products has been around since the beginning of trade. Businesses realized that they needed to
constantly be innovating and improving their products and services, especially in the face of
heightened competition and market shifts [11]. Product improvement has been a common
practice in companies around the globe as a result of the rapid speed of technological
advancement and digital product sales.
The following are essential parts of a better product
• Feature Additions: Enhancing the product with more features. For example, smartphones
have continuously added features like video calling to keep up with the demand for more
versatile communication tools.
• Usability Improvements: Clarifying the product's interface for easier use. Microsoft Word,
for instance, underwent a major usability improvement with the introduction of the Ribbon
interface, which organized tools more clearly compared to the older, text-based menu
system, making it much easier for users to find and use various features.
• Performance Optimisation: Improving the product's dependability, efficiency, or speed [12].
Tesla, for example, uses over-the-air software updates to enhance vehicle performance,
enabling improvements in things like battery efficiency or autopilot capabilities without the
need for users to visit a service center.
• Design Upgrades: Enhancing the visual appeal and usability of the product. The MacBook
Pro is a prime example, where the introduction of a sleeker design and the Retina Display
provided not only a more attractive look but also a higher-quality viewing experience.
Types of Enhancements: Incremental vs. Transformational
Product enhancements can be broadly categorised into two types: incremental and
transformational (also known as radical) innovations. To ensure that product development is on
target and strategic planning is sound there is need to establish the differences between these
two methods [13].

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 55 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

1. Incremental Enhancements
When it comes to incremental changes these are incremental changes, making a product, process
or service slightly better than before. These changes are to increase effectiveness, productivity
or customer satisfaction but are not likely to cause a shift in the basic roles or structure of the
product. Such innovations are often characterized by:
• Continuous Improvement: Applying continuous minor adjustments that, when
accumulated, produce marked improvements in efficiency in the long run. These are
minor adjustments applied regularly, which, over time, lead to significant improvements
in efficiency and effectiveness. For example, a smartphone brand improving its battery
life or camera quality in each new model.
• Lower Risk: Because change is gradual and based on existing products and services, it
is often accompanied by less risk than radical innovations [14]. Since the changes are
gradual and based on existing products or services, incremental enhancements typically
come with lower risk compared to radical innovations. For instance, car manufacturers
making improvements in fuel efficiency or safety features with each model year.
• Resource Efficiency: Usually, incremental innovations involve less expenditure, due to
which SMEs can accommodate these innovations. For example, the literature reveals
that growth and survival in SMEs depend on incremental innovations [15]. Incremental
innovations generally involve lower expenditures and are more resource-efficient. Small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often find it easier to implement these types of
innovations.
Real-World Example: Apple’s annual updates to its iPhone models often include incremental
changes such as improved cameras, faster processors, and better battery life without drastically
changing the phone's overall design.
2. Transformational Enhancements
Radical improvements include innovations that make the product distinct or dramatically
modify it, which brings out a completely distinct product or a drastically different product. These
innovations often lead to the development of new markets or the disruption of existing ones and
are characterised by
• High Impact: Transformational innovations can significantly alter the market, customer
expectations, and business operations. For instance, the introduction of the first iPhone
created a completely new market for smartphones, revolutionizing how we
communicate, work, and entertain ourselves.
• Increased Risk and Reward: They are normally associated with higher risks given their
ideas and concepts are new to the market, but in equal measure, they come with the
advantage of high returns [16]. Because these innovations involve new, untested ideas
or concepts, they often come with higher risks. However, if successful, they yield high
returns. The launch of Tesla’s electric vehicles is an example of a transformational
product that revolutionized the automobile industry, despite significant risks and
challenges involved in the development.
• Resource Intensiveness: Radical innovations typically require considerable investment
in research and development, which can be costly. Companies investing in
transformational enhancements often face high upfront costs but stand to reap substantial
rewards if the innovation succeeds. A prime example is the development of the first

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 56 Moore et al. (2021)

 American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

electric vehicle by Tesla, which required significant investment in technology,

infrastructure, and brand positioning.
Real-World Example: The advent of cloud computing represents a transformational
enhancement in IT infrastructure. Companies like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft
Azure completely transformed how businesses store and manage data, replacing traditional on-
premise servers with scalable cloud solutions.
Strategic Considerations
The type of innovation that is desirable depends on a number of factors, which include the
organizational objectives, the external environment, and the resources available to the firm.
Some key considerations include
• Market Position: The incumbent firms, hence, may adopt more incremental innovations in
order to defend their position in the market, while entrants may introduce radical
innovations to the market. Market entrants create game-changing ideas to seize market
share, while incumbent businesses focus on incremental enhancements to lower
manufacturing costs, according to product evolution research.
• Organisational Culture: Risk-taking is more associated with transformational
enhancements compared to cultures which embrace creative inputs [17].
• Customer Needs: Knowing whether customers are willing to receive incremental
innovations or novelty products and services is critical for innovation management [18].
In conclusion, both incremental and transformational enhancements play vital roles in product
development. A balanced approach tailored to the organization’s context and market
environment can lead to sustained success and competitiveness.
Key Challenges in Product Enhancement Strategies
The identification of sound product improvement solutions is critical for organizations that wish
to remain relevant and respond to ever-changing consumer needs. However, several key
challenges can impede the successful implementation of these strategies;
i. High Failure Rates and Associated Costs: Improving or initiating products is high-risk
since the success and failure rate ranges from 40% to 80%. Such costs are significant; to
launch a new product into the market could cost roughly about $15 million. It is therefore
clear why market research plays a very significant role when it comes to managing risks
that may lead to enormous losses [19].
ii. Resource Constraints: Small businesses have constrained resources of capital, manpower
and information technology infrastructure that challenge their product development
processes. Efficient use of these scarce resources is crucial to survive the challenges arising
from product improvement [20].
iii. Market Saturation and Competition: Some of the problems associated with the maturity
stage include market stagnation and competition from other players. Mingling growth
during this phase calls for special strategies to maintain market competitiveness and
profitability.
iv. Organizational and Process Integration: Product improvements require intense
cooperation between different functional teams and should follow a specific process. Some
risks are in relation to teaming, including recognising different teams, gaining top
management support, and creating a sustainable environment for innovation [21].

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 57 Moore et al. (2021)

 American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

v. Technological and Market Uncertainties: This has major challenges especially when
there is ambiguity on the feasibility of the technology and the market. Agreeing that these
uncertainties are inevitable, establishing a sound new product development framework that
blends agility and design thinking is useful.
vi. Software Product Management Complexities: The software industry presents particular
issues like new technologies’ introduction, new customer demands, and frequent product
modification. Managing complexities of software products therefore requires subscribing
to effective software product management practices [22].
Managing Complexity In Product Development
Product development is not a single step process but a series of activities which involve
conception, design, modeling, testing and making of the product. As used here, the term
complexity is defined as a state wherein a number of factors are involved and are mutually
dependent on each other within the design, utility of the product and market acceptability[23].
Appreciation of complexity is useful for managing challenges and ensuring that complex
products which are competitive and innovative are developed[24]. The key dimensions of
product development complexity are as follows:
Dimensions of Complexity in Product Development
• Technical Complexity: Complexity of product formations, additions of new sophisticated
technologies, and its ability to interface or replace other systems[25]. For example, Tesla
faces significant technical complexity as it integrates cutting-edge technologies into its
electric vehicles (EVs), such as advanced battery systems, autopilot features, and AI-
based driving capabilities.
• Process Complexity: Involves the coordination of relationships between diverse tasks of
product development and distribution. A practical example is Apple, which has
successfully streamlined its product development processes across multiple global teams
to ensure seamless coordination from design to manufacturing, ultimately delivering
products like the iPhone efficiently. Microsoft exemplifies this, with its product
development teams working across different time zones and disciplines. Effective
collaboration tools and clear communication protocols help mitigate this challenge.
• Organizational Complexity: The management of multiple teams, participants and
departments in an organisation where people may work from different geographic
regions[26].
• Market Complexity: Fluctuations in the needs of customers, competition, market needs
and expectations, and standards that a product needs to meet. Samsung navigates market
complexity by continuously adapting its smartphones and consumer electronics to meet
changing consumer preferences and technological advancements.
Sources of Complexity
• Customization and Personalization: As consumers demand unique services and products,
designs and architectures become more complicated. For example, Nike offers
customized sneakers through its Nike By You platform, which requires the company to
manage intricate production and design processes to meet individual customer
preferences.
• Integration of Emerging Technologies: Integrating any AI, IoT, or any other advanced
technology raises the stakes[27]. General Electric (GE), for instance, integrates IoT

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 58 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

sensors into its machinery and equipment to provide predictive maintenance and real-
time data analytics, creating complex product ecosystems.
• Regulatory and Compliance Requirements: Policies regarding local and international
standardisation can pose some challenges to the advancement in development of the
technology[28]. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer must adhere to stringent
regulations across various markets, which significantly affects their product development
timelines and processes.
• Evolving Market Trends: In this process, it has been challenging to meet the pace of the
customers and at the same time guarantee the stability of the product. Amazon
exemplifies this with its ability to adapt to market trends in e-commerce and logistics,
constantly optimizing its systems to meet evolving customer demands.
Challenges Associated with Complexity
• Resource Allocation: Striking the time, cost, and personnel optimisation when it comes
to complex issues. For example, Toyota has developed sophisticated lean manufacturing
techniques to ensure optimal resource allocation while developing new vehicle models,
ensuring high-quality production without overextending resources.
• Communication and Collaboration: Effective communication across various disciplines
and specializations [29]. Google manages this challenge by fostering an open culture and
using collaborative tools like Google Docs and Hangouts, which enable real-time
communication across its global teams.
• Risk of Delays: Interactions between components may indicate complex
interdependence, which may block the pipeline and drain fluid from the product's market
timetable[30]. For instance, Boeing experienced delays in its 787 Dreamliner project due
to complexities in supply chain coordination and integration of various systems.
Addressing these complexities through modular design and better integration strategies
could have reduced these delays.
• Decision-Making: The measuring of the priority levels of goals and objectives as well as
making decisions on the likelihood of achieving different goals and objectives based on
a set of criteria such as time, cost and quality[31]. Amazon relies heavily on data-driven
decision-making processes, using insights from customer behavior and operational
metrics to determine the most effective course of action.
The Need for Complexity Management
• Failure to manage complexity can lead to increased costs, extended time-to-market, and
limited market applicability. For instance, Intel faced delays in releasing new
semiconductor products due to complexity in its manufacturing process, which caused
the company to lose ground to competitors like AMD.
• Understanding is a strong defence against risk because it gives organisations an early
clue on possible problems that can be countered using different mitigation measures[32].
• Managing complexity provides organizations with early insights into potential problems,
allowing for timely mitigation measures. This helps in creating durable, scalable products
aligned with long-term business strategies, preventing costly redesigns and missed
market opportunities.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 59 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

Frameworks for Understanding Complexity

• Systems Thinking: An initial attempt to grasp specific interactions and dependencies of
the product as a component of the bigger structure[33]. For example, Tesla’s integration
of electric powertrains, self-driving technologies, and energy management systems is a
clear application of systems thinking.
• Complexity Theory: For example, current theories of emergence, self-organisation and
flexibility in complex systems may be used when developing a product[34]. Google’s
Android operating system is an example of a complex, self-organizing system that has
evolved over time, integrating multiple hardware and software components seamlessly.
• Modular Design: Dividing large systems into finer sub-systems to ease the issues of
design and production. IKEA employs modular design in its furniture, allowing for easy
customization and cost-effective production while catering to various customer needs.
Tools and Techniques for Optimizing Product Development
Product development combines creativity with technical and strategic management. Effective
tools and methods enhance competitiveness, meet customer needs, and align with business goals
while reducing costs and improving communication.
1) Modular Design for Flexibility and Efficiency
• Flexibility: Simplifies updates and improvements without altering the entire
system. For instance, Sony uses modular design in its PlayStation consoles,
enabling hardware upgrades and backward compatibility.
• Cost-Efficiency: Reduces development costs by reusing standardized modules.
Dell has utilized modular components in its computers for years, reducing
production costs and increasing customization options.
• Parallel Development: Allows teams to work on different product aspects
simultaneously[35]. For example, BMW uses parallel development processes in
designing new car models, ensuring faster and more efficient production cycles.
2) Digital Prototyping and Simulation
• Early Issue Detection: Identifies design flaws before physical production. Ford
uses digital prototyping and simulation in vehicle design to detect and resolve
issues early, significantly reducing costs and time-to-market.
• Cost Reduction: Minimizes dependency on physical prototypes. Siemens utilizes
digital twins and virtual prototypes to simulate industrial processes and reduce
physical testing costs.
• Iterative Design: Enables quick refinements and performance testing. Nike
leverages digital prototypes for iterative design of footwear, testing different
designs virtually before producing physical samples.
3) Agile Methodologies for Iterative Development
• Customer-Centric: Incorporates stakeholder feedback at every stage. Spotify
employs agile practices to continuously update and improve its music streaming
platform based on user feedback, enhancing customer satisfaction.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 60 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

• Team Collaboration: Integrates designers, engineers, and marketers. Netflix uses

agile development to ensure that cross-functional teams work seamlessly on
product improvements.
• Rapid Adaptability: Responds quickly to market and technology changes. Zara,
a global fashion retailer, uses agile supply chain management to quickly adapt to
changing trends and consumer demands.
4) Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Tools
• Centralized Data Management: Ensures consistency across teams. Caterpillar
uses PLM tools to manage complex data across its product development teams,
ensuring design consistency.
• Improved Collaboration: Aligns goals across design, engineering, and
manufacturing. Boeing uses PLM software to collaborate between teams
working on different aspects of aircraft design and production.
• Workflow Optimization: Tracks progress and mitigates delays. Siemens
integrates PLM with workflow management tools to optimize its manufacturing
processes and avoid delays.
5) Additive Manufacturing for Rapid Prototyping
• Speed and Agility: Enables quick validation of designs[36]. Lockheed Martin
uses additive manufacturing to create rapid prototypes of aerospace
components, enabling quick validation of designs before mass production.
• Cost-Effective Iteration: Eliminates the need for moulds or tools. General
Electric has adopted additive manufacturing for turbine parts, which reduces
costs and enhances efficiency in product iterations.
• Customization: Facilitates complex, tailored designs. Stratasys provides
customized 3D printing solutions to industries like healthcare, where tailored
prosthetics are created rapidly using additive manufacturing.
By employing modular design strategies, these companies can effectively manage market
complexity and remain competitive while offering customizable solutions that meet the ever-
changing needs of their customers.
Strategic Approaches To Product Enhancements
Product improvements are important in retaining market position, increasing consumers’
satisfaction, and responding to new requirements. Tactical approaches consider approaches to
product improvement in the light of professed customer requirements, technological trends, and
business goals[37]. All these strategies focus on how to plan, how to come up with creative
solutions, and how to implement meaningful upgrades to help both the business and the users.
Figure 2 depicts the product enhancement strategies.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 61 Moore et al. (2021)

 American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

Figure 2 Product Enhancement Strategies

i.Focus on Customer Needs
Positioning the value created by the customer reflects the great importance of identifying
customer pains as targets for subsequent product improvements. Customers, for instance, give
feedback, conduct surveys and engage on social media platforms where they are informed about
some areas that need to be worked on or on new areas of added value. Organizations that
consider customers’ needs and wants in their processes present solutions that go beyond the
expectations of the users, hence making them loyal[38]. It is a practice that engages with
customers in order to check their changing needs to ensure that the product meets the current
market standards. A notable example is how Amazon continuously enhances its customer
experience, incorporating customer feedback through reviews and direct surveys to optimize
product features and logistics services. By prioritizing customer needs and expectations,
businesses can deliver solutions that exceed user demands, fostering customer loyalty. Regularly
engaging with customers ensures that products stay relevant and aligned with evolving market
standards.
ii.Analyze Market Trends
Products need to be developed and enhanced based on the activities in the market, hence
requiring monitoring of the market events and competitor’s activities[39]. Market research helps
in getting insights into changing consumer behavior patterns and evolving technologies that
enable organizations to begin learning needs when they are not actualized by many people[40].
It also fosters introduction of various features, which help realize product differentiation and
leadership in a given sector. With the help of competitor analysis businesses get to know what
strategies are effective and what strategies are not to be taken anymore. For instance, Tesla uses
market data to innovate and improve its electric vehicle lineup by integrating advanced
technologies like autonomous driving and self-charging features, staying ahead of competitors.
Competitor analysis reveals effective strategies to emulate and ineffective ones to avoid. These
insights foster the introduction of differentiated features, establishing product leadership within
specific sectors.
iii.Embrace Agile Development
Using agile methodologies brings a distinct focus and cyclic form of approaches suitable for
enhancing product changes in organizations’ centers. When development is split into features,
teams can introduce, measure, and improve changes within a production environment without
much danger. This results in positive feedback cycles that guarantee improvements meet the

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 62 Moore et al. (2021)

 American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

customer needs and the current market conditions on each cycle[41][42]. Design and
development of improvement is done across organizations where designers, developers, and
marketers are some of the functional teams used; this is because the improvement affects various
dimensions of the product. Agile development not only facilitates the process of delivering
enhancement quickly but also makes it possible for organizations to be flexible in responding
to complaints and or new calls[43]. An example of this is Spotify, which frequently releases
small, iterative updates to its music streaming platform, based on user feedback, to refine user
interfaces and improve features like recommendations. This iterative process ensures that
enhancements align with customer needs and market conditions while enabling rapid responses
to feedback and emerging demands. Through cross-functional teamwork between designers,
developers and marketers Agile development ensures improvements target different dimensions
of a product. The methodology allows fast delivery and builds organizational adaptability while
speeding up time to market.
iv.Leverage Technology
Applying applied technologies is one of the most important principles of strategic product
improvement. Application of artificial intelligence, machine learning and other automation tools
allow organizations to control processes, predict customers’ behavior and provide new features.
Prediction analytics enables businesses to find problem areas where user-focused improvements
would generate more appeal. Related to operational optimisation, technology also increases
productivity by relieving routine tasks for innovative solutions. Through the participation of
innovative solutions, organizations can provide people with unique and valuable functionalities
that will help them adapt to the competitive environments of today’s world and make the
necessary improvements to become associated with innovation and quality. Through machine
learning algorithms Netflix delivers customized content suggestions that build user satisfaction
as well as viewing engagement. Artificial intelligence systems that perform predictive analytics
help organizations detect areas which need improvement and developing trends to make relevant
updates which users will appreciate. Machine learning technologies break down customer
behaviors to suggest customized product choices and automated procedures optimize business
operations by releasing personnel for innovative work. Leveraging these technologies positions
organizations as innovation leaders and allows them to adapt swiftly to competitive
environments.
Literature Review
Table I summarises previous studies on strategic approaches and tools for optimising product
enhancements and managing complexity in various domains, as discussed below:
In, Li and Lau (2018) analysed the issues with the present "new" product development process
in manufacturing sectors and investigated how a four-step smart product development strategy
may enhance the safety of toy products any further. There are several stages to the new product
development process that various manufacturing companies use while making consumer goods.
There is already an integration of IT with smart-related elements in Industry 4.0 to increase
transparency and productivity, but the safety of toy products is only evaluated during the new
product development phase[44].
In, Cui, Chan and Calantone (2014) research shows that a company's prior knowledge can have
a dual impact: increasing its capacity to profit from fresh information and decreasing its
incentive to learn. Compared to companies that depend either too little or too much on existing
knowledge, those that use a reasonable amount of current knowledge gain more from new
information. The "learning zone" describes this ideal situation. In addition, they discover that

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 63 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

for less unique new items that offer a comparable learning environment, the moderating effects
of prior knowledge are more pronounced[45].
In, Rangu, Chatterjee and Valluru (2017) tries to extrapolate useful information from asset
evaluations in order to improve asset Text mining, sometimes called text data mining, is a
method for discovering relevant and non-trivial information or patterns within text sources. tries
to extrapolate useful information from asset evaluations in order to improve asset Text mining,
sometimes called text data mining, is a method for discovering relevant and non-trivial
information or patterns within text sources. An ever-developing technology, text mining aids
businesses in gaining a deep understanding of their consumers and redefining their
demands[10].
In, Iyer et al. (2017) they have acquired the reviews for six different phone models by scraping
the Amazon website. After cleaning the data, they founded that it contains people's opinions
expressed in various ways. Our system will compile product reviews, analyse each word's
emotion score, and then decide if the phrase is generally good or negative. They have created a
dashboard that allows the consumer to readily see the mobile's individual characteristics. Based
on the needs of our users, they have also forecasted comparable items. The charts show how the
product's popularity has changed over time. The system's end result will be 1) a review timeline
2) Suggesting Products[46].
In, Xiu and Muro (2017) in the manufacturing sector, analysing faulty manufacturing data is
critical for improving product quality. A unique ID issued to each product allows for the retrieval
of manufacturing data used in defect investigation. Unfortunately, individual IDs cannot be
added to current machining operations in production lines, such as the sintering and cutting
procedures. This leads to the issue of not being able to prepare manufacturing data for fault
investigation[47- 59].

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 64 Moore et al. (2021)

 American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

Table 1 Presents a Summary of Previous Study Based on Product Enhancements

Strategic Approaches to Managing Complexity
References Objectives Key Findings Challenges Limitations Future Work
[44] Improve toy Smart-related Limited Focuses only Broaden the
product safety aspects of integration of on toy smart
through smart Industry 4.0 toy safety product development
product improve assessment in safety approach to
development productivity Industry 4.0 without other
approach. but lack processes. addressing manufacturing
emphasis on broader sectors.
toy product applications.
safety.
[45] Examine the Moderate use Balancing the Stronger Expand
effects of existing of existing use of existing effects studies to
knowledge on knowledge knowledge to observed in explore
firm's ability to provides avoid learning products of learning zones
leverage new optimal inhibition. lower in high-
information. benefit, novelty; novelty
termed the limited to products.
"learning specific
zone." contexts.
[10] Enhance asset Text mining Transforming Dependency Develop more
management aids in unstructured on advanced robust NLP
using text mining understanding text into algorithms techniques for
for extracting customer structured data and tools for broader text
valuable patterns needs and for analysis. accurate text mining
from text. redefining mining. applications.
their
requirements.
[46] Analyse product Sentiment Scraping, Relies on Incorporate
reviews and analysis can cleaning, and customer more features
sentiment for predict analysing reviews, for product
better product diverse which may review
recommendations popularity sentiment data not represent analysis and
and insights. and accurately. all user sentiment
recommend perspectives. prediction.
similar items
effectively.
[47] Analyse defect Existing Lack of Cannot Innovate
manufacturing machining individual analyse methods to
data to improve processes product defect data assign unique
product quality. limit defect identifiers in for processes identifiers in
data analysis certain without all
due to lack of manufacturing individual manufacturing
individual processes. product processes.
IDs. identifiers.
i. Research Gaps and Direction
The reviewed studies highlight diverse strategic approaches and tools for optimizing product
enhancements and managing complexity across various industries. In the manufacturing sector,
smart product development strategies have been shown to enhance productivity but often lack
focus on integrating safety measures during the development process. Organizations need to

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 65 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

close these gaps to achieve comprehensive innovation processes. New technological capabilities
in text mining combined with sentiment analysis hold promise to extract deep product
development insights from unorganized data sources that include customer review content. The
effectiveness of these methods relies on complex algorithms and advanced tools but their precise
accuracy suffers when working with subpar data resources. Quality improvement in
manufacturing depends on analyzing defect data. Complex production environments create
barriers for today's systems to assign dedicated identifiers to products which prevents them from
tracking and resolving defects efficiently.
The research provides insightful information about strategic methods and operational tools yet
fails to bridge the gaps around comprehensive implementation of safety, innovation and quality
in product development sequences. Current frameworks restrict universal application because
they concentrate on individual industries and technological areas. The present research aims to
fill this gap by proposing a comprehensive approach that combines advanced tools, such as
modular design and predictive analytics, with strategies to balance innovation and efficiency.
The comprehensive framework optimizes product creation at all levels of industry operations
making products adaptable to emerging obstacles and technological innovations. Future
investigations should research enhanced prediction analytics together with AI-based choice
processes along with real-time data cohesion to achieve increased product improvement
efficiency and adaptability. Further research must focus on exploring new tracking techniques
for product quality throughout production and the modular exploration of innovation versus
cost-effectiveness balance.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusion
Product enhancements serve as fundamental elements that preserve market competitiveness
together with customer satisfaction under changing market conditions. Firms can optimize
processes and reduce risks by adopting strategic approaches along with Agile methodologies
and modular design and emerging technological tools during complex product development
projects. Organizations can sustain steady growth by combining incremental and
transformational innovation approaches to manage resource constraints and market saturation
and technological uncertainties. Through effective inclusion of customer input alongside market
data businesses guarantee their products stay appropriate with their organization's goals.
The findings of the analyzed studies deliver concrete information which decision-makers across
different sectors can turn into measurable actions. Our focus on safety in smart product
development will make organizations guide their design phases toward quality and regulatory
compliance which defines current safety standards. Prior knowledge research demonstrates how
practitioners should use "learning zone" strategies to create innovative learning opportunities.
Through their text mining applications for customer insights companies can enhance product
design while delivering better satisfaction rates to their consumers. Sentiment analysis systems
provide businesses with market trend insight tools to develop better marketing strategies.
Research into defect analysis demonstrates the importance of better traceability systems which
drives organizations to develop improved manufacturing quality through technological
innovation and policy initiatives. These combined research findings create the groundwork to
implement data-driven approaches integrated with customer orientation and sustainability in
real-world innovation initiatives.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 66 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

Recommendations
Future research should explore the integration of AI and machine learning to enhance product
optimisation, particularly in predictive analytics and real-time complexity management.
Additionally, studies should focus on developing cost-effective frameworks for leveraging
emerging technologies like digital twins and additive manufacturing. There is also a need for
cross-industry collaboration to establish standardised practices for managing complexity in
product development. Lastly, the sustainability of product enhancements should be examined,
ensuring that innovation aligns with environmental and societal goals.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 67 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

REFERENCES
[1] A. S. Hosseini, S. Soltani, and M. Mehdizadeh, “Competitive advantage and its
impact on new product development strategy (Case study: Toos Nirro technical
firm),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 2018, doi: 10.3390/joitmc4020017.
[2] E. P. Garina, V. P. Kuznetsov, N. S. Andryashina, E. V. Romanovskaya, and S. N.
Kuznetsova, “Exploring alternative strategies for managing the complexity of a
product,” in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-
00102-5_78.
[3] J. F. Hair, “Knowledge creation in marketing: The role of predictive analytics,” Eur.
Bus. Rev., 2007, doi: 10.1108/09555340710760134.
[4] M. Möller and C. Vuik, “A conceptual framework for quantum accelerated automated
design optimization,” Microprocess. Microsyst., 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.micpro.2019.02.009.
[5] T. Wang, Y. Chen, M. Qiao, and H. Snoussi, “A fast and robust convolutional neural
network-based defect detection model in product quality control,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf.
Technol., 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0882-0.
[6] A. Sanglub, P. Nilsook, and P. Wannapiroon, “Imagineering on augmented reality and
digital twin for digital competence,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., 2019, doi:
10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.3.1201.
[7] P. Aivaliotis, K. Georgoulias, and G. Chryssolouris, “The use of Digital Twin for
predictive maintenance in manufacturing,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2019, doi:
10.1080/0951192X.2019.1686173.
[8] Y. Tchana, G. Ducellier, and S. Remy, “Designing a unique Digital Twin for linear
infrastructures lifecycle management,” in Procedia CIRP, 2019. doi:
10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.176.
[9] V. Krishnan and K. T. Ulrich, “Product development decisions: A review of the
literature,” 2001. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.1.10668.
[10] C. Rangu, S. Chatterjee, and S. R. Valluru, “Text mining approach for product quality
enhancement: (Improving product quality through machine learning),” in Proceedings
- 7th IEEE International Advanced Computing Conference, IACC 2017, 2017. doi:
10.1109/IACC.2017.0100.
[11] V. V. Kumar and F. T. S. Chan, “A superiority search and optimisation algorithm to
solve RFID and an environmental factor embedded closed loop logistics model,” Int. J.
Prod. Res., 2011, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2010.503201.
[12] V. V. Kumar, F. W. Liou, S. N. Balakrishnan, and V. Kumar, “Economical impact of
RFID implementation in remanufacturing: a Chaos-based Interactive Artificial Bee
Colony approach,” J. Intell. Manuf., 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0836-9.
[13] A. Azmi, N. A. Ahmad, L. K. Yiew, and Z. Abdul-Malek, “The use of enhancement
material in grounding system: A review,” 2019. doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i2.pp453-460.
[14] V. V. Kumar, M. K. Pandey, M. K. Tiwari, and D. Ben-Arieh, “Simultaneous
optimization of parts and operations sequences in SSMS: A chaos embedded Taguchi
particle swarm optimization approach,” J. Intell. Manuf., 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10845-
008-0175-4.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 68 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

[15] B. Li and L. Huang, “The Effect of Incremental Innovation and Disruptive Innovation
on the Sustainable Development of Manufacturing in China,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1,
Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019832700.
[16] V. V Kumar, M. Tripathi, M. K. Pandey, and M. K. Tiwari, “Physical programming
and conjoint analysis-based redundancy allocation in multistate systems: A Taguchi
embedded algorithm selection and control (TAS&C) approach,” Proc. Inst. Mech.
Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab., vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 215–232, Sep. 2009, doi:
10.1243/1748006XJRR210.
[17] C. Davis and Y. Tomoda, “Competing incremental and breakthrough innovation in a
model of product evolution,” J. Econ. Zeitschrift fur Natl., 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00712-
017-0568-y.
[18] V. V. Kumar, S. R. Yadav, F. W. Liou, and S. N. Balakrishnan, “A digital interface for
the part designers and the fixture designers for a reconfigurable assembly system,”
Math. Probl. Eng., 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/943702.
[19] M. G. Luchs, K. S. Swan, and M. E. H. Creusen, “Perspective: A Review of Marketing
Research on Product Design with Directions for Future Research,” in Journal of
Product Innovation Management, 2016. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12276.
[20] V. V. Kumar, F. T. S. Chan, N. Mishra, and V. Kumar, “Environmental integrated
closed loop logistics model: An artificial bee colony approach,” in SCMIS 2010 -
Proceedings of 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and
Information Systems: Logistics Systems and Engineering, 2010.
[21] V. V. Kumar, A. Sahoo, and F. W. Liou, “Cyber-enabled product lifecycle
management: A multi-agent framework,” in Procedia Manufacturing, 2019. doi:
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.247.
[22] V. V Kumar, M. Tripathi, S. K. Tyagi, S. K. Shukla, and M. K. Tiwari, “An integrated
real time optimization approach (IRTO) for physical programming based redundancy
allocation problem,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Reliab. Saf. …, no. August, 2007.
[23] V. Kumar, V. V. Kumar, N. Mishra, F. T. S. Chan, and B. Gnanasekar, “Warranty
failure analysis in service supply Chain a multi-agent framework,” in SCMIS 2010 -
Proceedings of 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and
Information Systems: Logistics Systems and Engineering, 2010.
[24] A. Trattner, L. Hvam, C. Forza, and Z. N. L. Herbert-Hansen, “Product complexity and
operational performance: A systematic literature review,” 2019. doi:
10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.02.001.
[25] V. V Kumar, “An interactive product development model in remanufacturing
environment : a chaos-based artificial bee colony approach,” Spring, 2014, [Online].
Available:
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8243&context=masters_thes
es
[26] J. R. San Cristóbal, L. Carral, E. Diaz, J. A. Fraguela, and G. Iglesias, “Complexity and
project management: A general overview,” 2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/4891286.
[27] M. Danilovic and T. R. Browning, “Managing complex product development projects
with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices,” Int. J. Proj. Manag.,
2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 69 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

[28] M. R. Kishore Mullangi, Vamsi Krishna Yarlagadda, Niravkumar Dhameliya,

“Integrating AI and Reciprocal Symmetry in Financial Management: A Pathway to
Enhanced Decision-Making,” Int. J. Reciprocal Symmetry Theor. Phys., vol. 5, no. 1,
pp. 42–52, 2018.
[29] S. K. R. A. Sai Charan Reddy Vennapusa, Takudzwa Fadziso, Dipakkumar Kanubhai
Sachani, Vamsi Krishna Yarlagadda, “Cryptocurrency-Based Loyalty Programs for
Enhanced Customer Engagement,” Technol. Manag. Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–62,
2018.
[30] I. Gorzeń-Mitka and M. Okręglicka, “Managing Complexity: A Discussion of Current
Strategies and Approaches,” Procedia Econ. Financ., 2015, doi: 10.1016/s2212-
5671(15)01018-7.
[31] V. K. Y. Mohamed Ali Shajahan, Nicholas Richardson, Niravkumar Dhameliya,
Bhavik Patel, Sunil Kumar Reddy Anumandla, “AUTOSAR Classic vs. AUTOSAR
Adaptive: A Comparative Analysis in Stack Development,” Eng. Int., vol. 7, no. 2, pp.
161–178, 2019.
[32] W. Vogel and R. Lasch, “Complexity drivers in manufacturing companies: a literature
review,” 2016. doi: 10.1007/s12159-016-0152-9.
[33] V. K. Y. Nicholas Richardson, Rajani Pydipalli, Sai Sirisha Maddula, Sunil Kumar
Reddy Anumandla, “Role-Based Access Control in SAS Programming: Enhancing
Security and Authorization,” Int. J. Reciprocal Symmetry Theor. Phys., vol. 6, no. 1,
pp. 31–42, 2019.
[34] J. KIM and D. WILEMON, “COMPLEXITY AND THE MULTIPLE IMPACTS ON
NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: RESULTS FROM A FIELD STUDY,” Int. J.
Innov. Technol. Manag., vol. 09, no. 06, p. 1250043, Dec. 2012, doi:
10.1142/S0219877012500435.
[35] J. Kim and D. Wilemon, “An empirical investigation of complexity and its
management in new product development,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 2009,
doi: 10.1080/09537320902819296.
[36] D. Olausson and C. Berggren, “Managing uncertain, complex product development in
high-tech firms: In search of controlled flexibility,” R D Manag., 2010, doi:
10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00609.x.
[37] K. Sultan, S. Akram, S. Abdulhaliq, D. Jamal, and R. Saleem, “A Strategic Approach
to the Consumer Perception of Brand on the Basis of Brand Awareness and Brand
Loyalty,” Int. J. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. (2147- 4478), 2019, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.259.
[38] C. S. Katsikeas, C. N. Leonidou, and A. Zeriti, “Eco-friendly product development
strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 2016, doi:
10.1007/s11747-015-0470-5.
[39] M. Kodama, “Developing strategic innovation in large corporations The dynamic
capability view of the firm,” Knowl. Process Manag., 2017, doi: 10.1002/kpm.1554.
[40] M. Z. Hasan, R. Fink, M. R. Suyambu, and M. K. Baskaran, “Assessment and
improvement of intelligent controllers for elevator energy efficiency,” in IEEE
International Conference on Electro Information Technology, 2012. doi:
10.1109/EIT.2012.6220727.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 70 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

[41] Y. H. Percival Zhang, M. E. Himmel, and J. R. Mielenz, “Outlook for cellulase

improvement: Screening and selection strategies,” 2006. doi:
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.003.
[42] M. Z. Hasan, R. Fink, M. R. Suyambu, and M. K. Baskaran, “Assessment and
improvement of elevator controllers for energy efficiency,” in Digest of Technical
Papers - IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, 2012. doi:
10.1109/ISCE.2012.6241747.
[43] M. Z. Hasan, R. Fink, M. R. Suyambu, M. K. Baskaran, D. James, and J. Gamboa,
“Performance evaluation of energy efficient intelligent elevator controllers,” in IEEE
International Conference on Electro Information Technology, 2015. doi:
10.1109/EIT.2015.7293320.
[44] C. H. Li and H. K. Lau, “Toy product safety enhancement using smart product
development,” in ISPCE-CN 2018 - IEEE International Symposium on Product
Compliance Engineering - Asia, 2018. doi: 10.1109/ISPCE-CN.2018.8805755.
[45] A. S. Cui, K. Chan, and R. Calantone, “The Learning Zone in New Product
Development,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 690–701, Nov. 2014, doi:
10.1109/TEM.2014.2331757.
[46] R. Iyer, R. Mandrekar, A. Aggarwal, P. Chaphekar, and G. Bhatia, “RecoMob:
Opinion mining for product enhancement,” in 2017 International Conference on
Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI 2017, 2017. doi:
10.1109/ICCCI.2017.8117687.
[47] Q. Xiu and K. Muro, “Robust inference traceability technology for product quality
enhancement,” in IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and
Engineering Management, 2017. doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290181.
[48] Sarisa, M., Boddapati, V. N., Patra, G. K., Kuraku, C., Konkimalla, S., & Rajaram, S.
K. (2020). An Effective Predicting E-Commerce Sales & Management System
Based on Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big
Data, 1(1), 75–85.
[49] Gollangi, H. K., Bauskar, S. R., Madhavaram, C. R., Galla, E. P., Sunkara, J. R., &
Reddy, M. S. (2020). Exploring AI Algorithms for Cancer Classification and Prediction
Using Electronic Health Records. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 1(1),
65–74. Retrieved from
[50] Manikanth Sarisa, Venkata Nagesh Boddapati, Gagan Kumar Patra, Chandrababu
Kuraku, Siddharth Konkimalla, Shravan Kumar Rajaram.Navigating the Complexities
of Cyber Threats, Sentiment, and Health with AI/ML. (2020). JOURNAL OF RECENT
TRENDS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (JRTCSE), 8(2), 22-
40. https://doi.org/10.70589/JRTCSE.2020.2.3
[51] Gollangi, H. K., Bauskar, S. R., Madhavaram, C. R., Galla, E. P., Sunkara, J. R., &
Reddy, M. S. (2020). Unveiling the Hidden Patterns: AI-Driven Innovations in Image
Processing and Acoustic Signal Detection. (2020). JOURNAL OF RECENT TRENDS
IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (JRTCSE), 8(1), 25-
45. https://doi.org/10.70589/JRTCSE.2020.1.3.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 71 Moore et al. (2021)

American Journal of Computing and Engineering
ISSN 2790-5586 (Online)
Vol.4, Issue 2, pp 52 – 72, 2021 www.ajpojournals.org

[52] Hemanth Kumar Gollangi, Sanjay Ramdas Bauskar, Chandrakanth Rao Madhavaram,
Eswar Prasad Galla, Janardhana Rao Sunkara and Mohit Surender Reddy.(2020).
“Echoes in Pixels: The intersection of Image Processing and Sound detection through
the lens of AI and Ml”, International Journal of Development Research. 10,(08),39735-
39743. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.28839.28.2020.
[53] Manikanth Sarisa, Venkata Nagesh Boddapati, Gagan Kumar Patra, Chandrababu
Kuraku, Siddharth Konkimalla and Shravan Kumar Rajaram. “The power of
sentiment: big data analytics meets machine learning for emotional insights”,
International Journal of Development Research, 10, (10), 41565-41573.
https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.28840.10.2020
[54] Mohit Surender Reddy, Manikanth Sarisa, Siddharth Konkimalla, Sanjay Ramdas
Bauskar, Hemanth Kumar Gollangi, Eswar Prasad Galla, Shravan Kumar Rajaram,
2021. "Predicting tomorrow’s Ailments: How AI/ML Is Transforming Disease
Forecasting", ESP Journal of Engineering & Technology Advancements, 1(2): 188-
200.
[55] K. Gollangi, S. R. Bauskar, C. R. Madhavaram, P. Galla, J. R. Sunkara, and M. S.
Reddy, “ECHOES IN PIXELS: THE INTERSECTION OF IMAGE PROCESSING
AND SOUND OPEN ACCESS ECHOES IN PIXELS: THE INTERSECTION OF
IMAGE PROCESSING AND SOUND DETECTION,” Int. J. Dev. Res., vol. 10, no.
08, pp. 39735–39743, 2020, doi: 10.37118/ijdr.28839.28.2020.
[56] Gollangi, H. K., Bauskar, S. R., Madhavaram, C. R., Galla, E. P., Sunkara, J. R., &
Reddy, M. S. (2020). Unveiling the Hidden Patterns: AI-Driven Innovations in Image
Processing and Acoustic Signal Detection. (2020). JOURNAL OF RECENT TRENDS
IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (JRTCSE), 8(1), 25- 45.
https://doi.org/10.70589/JRTCSE.2020.1.3.
[57] Gollangi, H. K., Bauskar, S. R., Madhavaram, C. R., Galla, E. P., Sunkara, J. R., &
Reddy, M. S. (2020). Exploring AI Algorithms for Cancer Classification and
Prediction Using Electronic Health Records. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big
Data, 1(1), 65–74. Retrieved from
https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/jaibd/article/view/1109
[58] Gagan Kumar Patra, Shravan Kumar Rajaram, & Venkata Nagesh Boddapati. (2019).
Ai And Big Data In Digital Payments: A Comprehensive Model For Secure Biometric
Authentication. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 25(4), 773–781.
https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v25i4.7591
[59] Chandrababu Kuraku, Hemanth Kumar Gollangi, & Janardhana Rao Sunkara. (2020).
Biometric Authentication In Digital Payments: Utilizing AI And Big Data For Real-
Time Security And Efficiency. Educational Administration: Theory and
Practice, 26(4), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v26i4.7590
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Chethan Sriharsha Moore, Suneel Babu Boppana, Varun Bodepudi,
Krishna Madhav Jha, Srinivasa Rao Maka, Gangadhar Sadaram

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2613 72 Moore et al. (2021)