The Parasitic Mind PDF

Gad Saad

Scan to Download
 The Parasitic Mind
Fighting Infectious Ideas That Are Destroying
Common Sense
Written by Bookey
Check more about The Parasitic Mind Summary

Scan to Download
About the book
In *The Parasitic Mind*, Gad Saad delves into the
battleground of ideas, exposing how irrational and dangerous
ideologies have infiltrated and hijacked the human mind much
like parasites. Drawing from his expertise as an evolutionary
behavioral scientist, Saad fearlessly dissects the influence of
these "idea pathogens" on our societal structures and
individual freedoms. With compelling arguments and a touch
of humor, he offers a robust defense of reason and
evidence-based thinking while providing the tools needed to
reclaim our sanity in an age increasingly dominated by
emotional thinking and moral grandstanding. *The Parasitic
Mind* invites readers on a journey to safeguard their
intellectual freedom, urging them to rise above the contagion
of uncritical acceptance and to embrace the discipline of
skeptical inquiry.

Scan to Download
About the author
Gad Saad is a renowned evolutionary psychologist, behavioral
scientist, and professor at Concordia University in Montreal,
Canada. Born in Lebanon and later emigrating to Canada, Saad
holds a doctorate in marketing and is a groundbreaking thinker
in the application of evolutionary psychology to consumer
behavior. Widely recognized for his insightful and often
provocative viewpoints, he has authored several influential
books and numerous scholarly articles. Saad is also a popular
public intellectual, known for his engaging social media
presence and his podcast, "The Saad Truth," where he
discusses scientific, philosophical, and cultural issues. His
work challenges contemporary orthodoxies and promotes free
speech, reason, and scientific inquiry.

Scan to Download
Summary Content List
Chapter 1 : From Civil War to the Battle of Ideas

Chapter 2 : Thinking versus Feeling, Truth versus

HurtFeelings

Chapter 3 : Non-Negotiable Elements of a Free andModern

Society

Chapter 4 : Anti-Science, Anti-Reason, and

IlliberalMovements

Chapter 5 : Campus Lunacy: The Rise of the Social

JusticeWarrior

Chapter 6 : Departures from Reason: Ostrich

ParasiticSyndrome

Chapter 7 : How to Seek Truth: Nomological Networks

ofCumulative Evidence

Chapter 8 : Call to Action

Scan to Download
Chapter 1 Summary : From Civil War to
the Battle of Ideas

CHAPTER ONE: From Civil War to the Battle of

Ideas

Introduction

The author, Gad Saad, discusses his motivations for

addressing contentious issues beyond his scientific expertise,
linking his outspoken nature to his experiences with warfare
and his dedication to freedom and truth. He shares how his
upbringing in war-torn Lebanon has influenced his disdain
for groupthink and identity politics.

Scan to Download
Growing Up in Lebanon

Saad recounts his childhood in Beirut as part of a declining

Jewish community amidst rising anti-Semitism. He describes
painful memories, including a personal experience during a
public mourning for Egyptian President Nasser when he
heard chants of "Death to Jews." This environment shaped
his identity and resentments toward tribalism and religious
dogma, culminating in the Lebanese Civil War, which
directly impacted his family's safety and necessitated their
emigration.

The Impact of Civil War

Saad details the horrific realities of the Lebanese Civil War,

including violence, fear, and betrayal among neighbors. A
particularly chilling experience involved an encounter with
men at their home during the chaos, wherein they felt their
safety threatened. Ultimately, the family fled to Montreal,
where Saad faced cultural challenges transitioning from an
environment of conflict to one of peace.

Life Ideals: Freedom and Truth

Scan to Download
Saad emphasizes two core ideals that guide him: freedom and
truth. He explains how his quest for freedom began at a
young age, feeling constrained by religious ceremonies. In
academia, he values intellectual freedom, advocating for
interdisciplinary research rather than hyper-specialization. He
recognizes that the pursuit of truth is facilitated by scientific
inquiry, which allows for self-correction and encourages
humility in knowledge.

Universities: Purveyors of Truth and Ecosystems of

Intellectual Garbage

After gaining his Ph.D., Saad observed a paradox within

academia: institutions that should stand for truth often
disseminate falsehoods and anti-scientific rhetoric, especially
in the social sciences. He expresses concern about
postmodernist ideologies that undermine scientific integrity
and promote ideological conformity, arguing that such
mindsets can propagate dangerous ideas.

Idea Pathogens as Parasites of the Human Mind

Saad introduces the concept of "parasitic ideas," likening

Scan to Download
harmful ideologies to biological pathogens that infect the
mind, rendering individuals unable to think critically. He
identifies prevalent ideologies that display characteristics of
mind viruses—including postmodernism, radical feminism,
and social constructivism—contributing to a culture of
defensiveness against objective truths.

Death of the West by a Thousand Cuts

Saad warns of the Western world's slow decline due to the

rise of political correctness and intolerant ideologies, which
stifle open discourse. He asserts that lacking honest
discussions on key issues can lead to societal
self-destructiveness. This chapter sets the stage for his further
exploration of how to combat these problematic ideas and
restore reason and intellectual freedom in society.

Scan to Download
Critical Thinking
Key Point:The Impact of Intellectual Conformity on
Academic Integrity
Critical Interpretation:Gad Saad's assertion that
universities, which are meant to pursue truth, often fall
prey to postmodern ideologies reflects a critical concern
about intellectual conformity stifling academic integrity.
While Saad passionately argues this viewpoint, which is
supported by critiques from scholars like John
McWhorter and Jordan Peterson, readers should remain
cautious about his sweeping generalization of the
academic landscape. Not all academic departments or
institutions succumb to 'ideological conformity,' as
many still uphold rigorous standards of research and
debate. This highlights the importance of nuanced
responses to his claims, as the landscape of academia is
complex and dynamic.

Scan to Download
 Chapter 2 Summary : Thinking versus
Feeling, Truth versus HurtFeelings
Section Summary

Feelings Discusses the conflict between reason and feelings, highlighting the impact of both nature and nurture on
personality. Evaluates consumer behavior through the Elaboration Likelihood Model, critiquing emotional
dominance in reasoning, particularly in politics.

Truth versus Contrasts truth and integrity in science with prioritizing emotional reactions over factual accuracy,
Hurt Feelings especially in academia and politics. Advocates for an unrestrained pursuit of truth, highlighting ethical
distinctions and the need for facts in crucial human endeavors.

Donald Trump Critiques the emotional hysteria surrounding Trump's election, arguing that such reactions lack logical
Is Going to End foundations and mischaracterize his supporters and their motives.
the World

The Brett Examines how political partisanship during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings undermined legal
Kavanaugh principles, with tribalism leading to emotional over logical responses.
Debacle

I’m Outraged! Details threats to academic discourse, citing examples such as Lawrence Summers and James Damore, who
I’m Offended! faced backlash for politically incorrect views, showcasing the conflict between scientific truth and political
correctness.

Conclusion Warns against emotionalism undermining intellectual rigor and free inquiry, advocating for a balance
between emotions and intellect to preserve clarity of thought and freedom of expression.

Thinking versus Feeling, Truth versus Hurt

Feelings

The chapter begins by discussing the tension between reason

and feelings, citing philosophers like David Hume and Hans
J. Eysenck. The author reflects on a debate about the
existence of God, underscoring that knowledge pursuit often

Scan to Download
defies binary classifications, leading to "epistemological
dichotomania." He emphasizes that both nature and nurture
influence human personality, advocating for an integrated
understanding of thinking and feeling.
The discourse pivots to consumer behavior, highlighting how
different products evoke different cognitive and emotional
responses. The Elaboration Likelihood Model illustrates two
routes of persuasion: central (cognitive) and peripheral
(emotional). The author critiques people who let emotions
dominate their reasoning, particularly in political contexts.

Truth versus Hurt Feelings

The chapter contrasts the pursuit of truth and scientific

integrity with the modern trend of prioritizing emotional
reactions over factual accuracy, especially in academia and
politics. Citing various examples, including the prosecution
of Geert Wilders for his criticisms of Islam, the author notes
how truth is sometimes deemed irrelevant in favor of
avoiding hurt feelings.
Through a dialogue with Joe Rogan, the author asserts that
the pursuit of truth should not be constrained by political
correctness. He distinguishes between deontological and
consequentialist ethics, suggesting that ethical clarity often

Scan to Download
gets lost amidst emotional responses. The text asserts that
important human endeavors, including legal proceedings and
scientific explorations, must rely on facts, not feelings.

Donald Trump Is Going to End the World

The author recounts the hysteria following Donald Trump's

election, illustrating how emotional responses from his
detractors lacked logical foundations. He criticizes the
narratives that categorized Trump supporters as
“deplorables,” proposing rational behavioral decision
theories to explain why many voted for him based on
substantive issues rather than emotional biases.

The Brett Kavanaugh Debacle

The narrative continues with a critique of the Kavanaugh

confirmation hearings, pointing out how political
partisanship undermined the presumption of innocence and
adherence to scientific principles. The author observes that
political tribalism led many to overlook critical legal tenets
in favor of emotional responses.

I’m Outraged! I’m Offended!

Scan to Download
Illustrating the threats to academic discourse, the author
references Lawrence Summers' resignation from Harvard
University due to politically charged comments about gender
differences. He discusses James Damore's controversial
Google memo, which challenged prevailing beliefs about
diversity and received backlash despite being well
substantiated.
Further examples of scientists facing repercussions for
politically incorrect humor or studies are recounted,
highlighting the tension between adherence to scientific truth
and the demands of politically correct narratives.

Conclusion

The chapter culminates in warning against the rising tide of

emotionalism that threatens intellectual rigor and free
inquiry. The author calls for a balanced approach where
emotions and intellect coexist, asserting that clarity of
thought is essential to counteract the spread of toxic
ideologies and preserve freedom of expression.

Scan to Download
Example
Key Point:The danger of prioritizing feelings over
facts can distort our understanding and
decision-making.
Example:Imagine attending a political debate where,
instead of discussing policies or facts, opponents hurl
personal insults and emotional appeals. You feel drawn
to the presentation that stirs your emotions, but as a
critical thinker, you realize this approach undermines
productive discourse. Here, personal sentiments
overshadow reasoned debate, leading to misconceptions.
This scenario reflects the tension between appealing to
your emotions and seeking factual truths, illustrating the
risk of letting feelings dictate your beliefs and decisions.

Scan to Download
Chapter 3 Summary : Non-Negotiable
Elements of a Free andModern Society

Non-Negotiable Elements of a Free and Modern

Society

John Stuart Mill's perspective on the silencing of opinions

emphasizes the harm it brings to human development,
voiding opportunities for truth and clearer perceptions. To
foster a truly liberal and modern society, essential features
include the guaranteed right to debate ideas (freedom of
speech) and a commitment to reason and the scientific
method as tools for evaluating competing ideas.

Social Media Companies and Free Speech

The misconception surrounding free speech is prevalent,

especially in relation to social media platforms. The right to
block or mute individuals does not equate to silencing their
opinions. Social media companies hold significant power
over the information shared and often suppress dissenting
voices under the guise of content moderation. This repression

Scan to Download
extends to monetization practices that undermine free
expression and often result in penalties for those expressing
unpopular views. Saad argues for regulating these platforms
similar to public utilities to protect users from arbitrary
speech monitoring.

Self-Censorship Is the Greatest Scourge to Free

Speech

Saad shares testimonials from students and academics who

practice self-censorship out of fear of political retribution in
universities dominated by political correctness. This
represents a chilling landscape where individuals feel
compelled to hide their beliefs due to concerns over career
potential and social acceptance.

Free Speech = Nazism?

An event at Ryerson University discussing free speech faced

cancellation due to threats from protesters labeling the
speakers as Nazis. Saad criticizes the pervasive culture of
Install Bookey
disinvitation App toofUnlock
and suppression Fullfigures
conservative Textinand
academic environments, whereAudio
freedom of speech is
increasingly undermined.

Scan to Download
Chapter 4 Summary : Anti-Science,
Anti-Reason, and IlliberalMovements

CHAPTER FOUR: Anti-Science, Anti-Reason, and

Illiberal Movements

Overview of Idea Pathogens in Academia

The chapter discusses the prevalence of idea pathogens on

university campuses, mainly driven by postmodernism and
related ideologies. Postmodernism claims knowledge is
relative, leading to movements like "Science Must Fall" that
challenge Western science as racist. Social constructivism
argues human behaviors are socially determined, denying

Scan to Download
biological influences on gender. The chapter emphasizes that
these ideas are scientifically false but are embraced due to
ideological commitments.

Freedom from Reality

A common theme among these ideologies is the desire to

liberate individuals from reality, exemplified by the blank
slate theory which posits that human experiences are solely
shaped by environment rather than genetics. This rejection of
biological instincts leads to denials of sex differences and
promotes the idea that gender is a social construct. The
author criticizes these beliefs as delusional, asserting the
importance of acknowledging biological facts.

Absurdity in Gender Discourse

The chapter narrates an anecdote highlighting absurd gender

discussions in academia, especially in relation to
postmodernism. Through debates about objective truths like
biological reproduction, the author illustrates how
postmodernist frameworks distort reality. This intellectual
trend escalates with examples like the Canadian Bill C-16,
which mandates recognition of self-identified gender, leading

Scan to Download
to potential repercussions for those who challenge these
norms.

Postmodernism’s Obfuscation

The chapter criticizes postmodernism as intellectual

deception, where complexity is mistaken for profundity. It
highlights the prevalence of nonsensical ideas in academic
discourse, exemplified by hoaxes that expose the gullibility
of postmodernist journals. The author's use of satire further
critiques the absurdity of these trends.

Grievance Studies Project

The chapter introduces the Grievance Studies Project, which

involved submitting fake papers to demonstrate how
ridiculous ideologies could get published in reputable
journals. These included absurd assertions about gender and
its impact on social issues, underscoring the lack of rigorous
standards in academia.

Trans Activism and Resulting Conflicts

The author discusses trans activism’s impact on women’s

Scan to Download
rights and competitive sports, highlighting cases where
biological males compete in female categories. This raises
questions about fairness and the implications for women’s
achievements. Anecdotes highlight the tension between
defending trans rights and recognizing biological differences.

Critique of Academic Feminism

The chapter scrutinizes modern feminism's shift to radical

positions that view masculinity as inherently toxic. The
author critiques feminist frameworks that pathologize
traditional male behaviors and challenge scientific evidence
on sex differences. He argues that these ideologies harm men
and create a culture that vilifies masculinity.

Political Correctness and Academic Culture

In concluding, the author warns of the dangers of political

correctness, which he views as stifling critical thought and
promoting ideological conformity. He describes universities
as breeding grounds for such ideologies, urging a return to
intellectual diversity and the critical examination of ideas.

Final Thoughts

Scan to Download
The chapter posits that ideologies rejecting scientific truths
lead to societal harm and cautions against the dangers of
allowing these prevailing narratives to dominate academic
and cultural landscapes. The author calls for a reevaluation of
how we engage with and challenge these ideas while
advocating for a foundation of reason and evidence.

Scan to Download
Critical Thinking
Key Point:The rejection of scientific truths in favor
of ideological commitments can lead to harmful
societal consequences.
Critical Interpretation:In 'The Parasitic Mind', Saad
critically argues that ideologies such as postmodernism
undermine the objective understanding of science,
resulting in a distortion of reality that could negatively
impact social discourse and policy. While his assertions
regarding the implications of these ideologies are
persuasive, readers should also consider alternative
perspectives on the interplay between science and
cultural narratives. Scholars like Thomas Kuhn in 'The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions' suggest that
scientific paradigms themselves are subject to social
influences, which indicates that the relationship between
science and ideology may not be as clear-cut as Saad
posits. This invites a deeper examination of how
academic environments can both challenge and uphold
certain beliefs.

Scan to Download
 Chapter 5 Summary : Campus Lunacy:
The Rise of the Social JusticeWarrior
Topic Summary

Overview of SJWs on Minority student-activists known as SJWs dominate university life through political correctness,
Campus prioritizing emotional safety over intellectual discourse.

Victimhood Culture The "Oppression Olympics" fosters competition for victim status among individuals, leading to a
culture centered on feelings and Collective Munchausen Syndrome.

Impact of Safe Spaces SJWs view opposing viewpoints as violence, resulting in less intellectual diversity and critical
and Echo Chambers thinking skills among students.

Nicety Versus Reality Trigger warnings hinder emotional growth, as they encourage avoidance rather than confronting
in Education fears according to exposure therapy principles.

Universities' Changing Social justice concerns now overshadow traditional academic goals, with universities emphasizing
Objectives sensitivity over the pursuit of truth.

Homeostasis of Victim status is maintained through amplifying perceived harms, expanding grievances to ensure
Victimology societal concern and emotional support.

Faux Outrage and Progressive sensitivity allows ordinary acts to be labeled offensive, leading to incidents of faux
Cultural Appropriation outrage that reflect shifting societal norms.

Weaponizing Collective Individuals claim victimhood to gain sympathy, exemplified by incidents like Jussie Smollett's fake
Munchausen hate crime.

Male SJWs and Social Male SJWs utilize a façade of progressive values to appear empathetic, often to gain social or
Dynamics romantic advantages.

Self-Flagellation in SJWs engage in self-flagellation to atone for perceived sins, fostering a cycle of guilt and virtue
Progressivism signaling over factual realities.

Conclusion The blend of campus dynamics, victim culture, and progressive ideals distorts truth and academic
integrity, highlighting the need for understanding these ideological impacts.

Campus Lunacy: The Rise of the Social Justice

Warrior

Overview of SJWs on Campus

Scan to Download
Student-activist social justice warriors (SJWs) may be a
minority but exert significant control over university
environments through political correctness and progressive
ideologies. Their influence leads to a focus on feelings over
truth, resulting in suppressive measures like trigger warnings
and safe spaces that prioritize emotional safety over
intellectual discourse.

Victimhood Culture

The concept of "Oppression Olympics" suggests that

individuals compete for status within a victim hierarchy
based on identity politics. This race to victimhood fosters a
culture where feelings are paramount and where even
individuals with established victim identities can be attacked
for straying from progressive tenets. Ideals of victimhood
have transformed into forms of Collective Munchausen
Syndrome, where individuals advertise their victimhood to
garner sympathy.

Impact of Safe Spaces and Echo Chambers

The SJW movement promotes a narrative that opposing

Scan to Download
viewpoints are a form of violence, contributing to an
environment that suppresses intellectual diversity. This
sterility in academic discussion parallels declining critical
thinking skills in students, akin to children brought up in
allergen-poor environments that lack the development of
resilience to debate and disagreement.

Nicety Versus Reality in Education

The current educational focus on creating safe spaces and

trigger warnings stifles growth and emotional resilience
among students. Exposure therapy principles suggest that
overcoming fears comes from facing them, yet trigger
warnings may lead to increased avoidance of distressing
topics rather than building coping strategies.

Universities' Changing Objectives

Universities traditionally aimed to maximize knowledge

acquisition. However, social justice concerns now dominate,
with institutions prioritizing sensitivity over truth-seeking.
This transformation is evident in the mission statements of
universities that emphasize social justice over academic
rigor.

Scan to Download
Homeostasis of Victimology

Victimology now operates on a principle of homeostasis,

where maintaining a victim status becomes vital. This drive
motivates the amplification of perceived harms, expanding
the definition of grievances to maintain an adequate level of
societal concern and emotional support.

Faux Outrage and Cultural Appropriation

The progressive culture cultivates enough sensitivity that

ordinary elements can be labeled as racist or culturally
appropriative. This phenomenon often leads to exaggerated
incidents of faux outrage, illustrating how societal norms
have shifted to safeguard against perceived offenses,
regardless of context.

Weaponizing Collective Munchausen

Collective Munchausen manifests in individuals claiming

victimhood to seek sympathy. The rise of incidents like
Jussie Smollett's fake hate crime showcases how the
desperate pursuit of victim status can lead individuals to

Scan to Download
fabricate claims of distress.

Male SJWs and Social Dynamics

Male social justice warriors exhibit a behavior described as

"sneaky fuckers," where they align with progressive values to
appear empathetic to women while using this façade to
benefit socially and romantically.

Self-Flagellation in Progressivism

Many SJWs engage in self-flagellation as a means of atoning

for perceived original sins associated with their identity. This
ideology promotes a cycle of guilt and virtue signaling that
often disregards factual realities in favor of ideological
purity.

Conclusion

The intersection of campus dynamics, victim culture, and the

quest for progressive ideals has led to a distortion of truth,
emotional resilience, and academic integrity. Understanding
these patterns is essential for tackling the social and political
ramifications of contemporary ideological movements on
university campuses.

Scan to Download
Example
Key Point:The suppression of diverse viewpoints
hinders intellectual growth and resilience on college
campuses.
Example:Imagine you're a student eager to engage in a
heated debate in class. Instead, you find the atmosphere
stifled by trigger warnings and echo chambers
dissuading any dissent from the prevailing narrative.
The fear of offending someone overrides the desire to
explore complex ideas. As a result, you're encouraged to
prioritize emotional safety over critical discourse,
leaving you ill-equipped to face real-world challenges
that require robust debate and resilience.

Scan to Download
Chapter 6 Summary : Departures from
Reason: Ostrich ParasiticSyndrome

CHAPTER SIX

Departures from Reason: Ostrich Parasitic

Syndrome

Introduction

The chapter emphasizes the tendency of individuals to deny

uncomfortable truths, drawing from famous quotes that
highlight this inclination. It stresses that science should focus
on truth rather than ideology, illustrating this with historical
examples like the rejection of sociobiology by prominent
scientists due to Marxist beliefs.

Ostrich Parasitic Syndrome (OPS)

OPS is defined as a disorder where individuals reject clear

Scan to Download
realities in favor of constructed alternate realities. This
phenomenon leads to self-deception and illogical
justifications, similar to traditional cognitive biases. The term
is derived from the metaphor of an ostrich burying its head in
the sand, avoiding unpleasant truths.

The Six Degrees of Faux-Causality

People suffering from OPS often create illusory causal

connections to explain phenomena, as shown by Bill Nye’s
illogical link between climate change and terrorism. This
section underscores how cognitive biases allow individuals
to overlook logical reasoning, instead attributing a wide
range of societal problems to single causes based on personal
ideologies.

Cultural Diversion and Immigration

The chapter critiques the oversimplified notion that increased

diversity automatically brings strength to a society, using
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s mantra "Diversity
Install
Is Our Bookey
Strength" Apppoint.
as a focal to Unlock Full
It suggests thatText and
cultural
Audiorather than solutions,
differences can lead to challenges
arguing for the importance of assimilating immigrants into

Scan to Download
Chapter 7 Summary : How to Seek
Truth: Nomological Networks
ofCumulative Evidence

CHAPTER SEVEN: How to Seek Truth:

Nomological Networks of Cumulative Evidence

Introduction

- The challenge of being an informed citizen in a free society

is discussed, including cognitive shortcuts, emotional biases,
and resistance to changing established beliefs, as addressed
by cognitive dissonance theory.

Establishing Truth

- Philosophical frameworks for truth, such as empirical and

mathematical proofs, are explored. The scientific method and
the provisional nature of scientific truths are emphasized,
alongside the personal biases that scientists may hold.

Scan to Download
Nomological Networks of Cumulative Evidence

- The importance of cumulative evidence in establishing

robust scientific truths is illustrated, using Charles Darwin's
synthesis of data across varied fields as a prime example.

Examples of Cumulative Evidence Networks

1.
Toy Preferences

- Evidence against the social constructivist narrative is

presented, demonstrating biological and evolutionary
underpinnings of sex-specific toy preferences through
developmental and comparative studies.
2.
Human Mating Preferences

- Cumulative evidence highlights the sex differences in

mating preferences rooted in evolutionary psychology,
supported by studies across cultures and historical contexts.
3.
Islamic Context

Scan to Download
 - A nomological network examining the nature of Islam is
constructed, focusing on its growth, historical treatment of
minorities, and evaluating the prevalence of terrorism linked
to Islamic ideologies. Data from various studies and analyses
are provided to illustrate trends in violence and intolerance
associated with Islamic teachings.

Conclusion

- The chapter encapsulates the relevance of nomological

networks of cumulative evidence in assessing various
arguments and issues, advocating for an intellectual approach
in debates on significant societal topics. It calls for an
objective analysis supported by diverse sources of evidence,
urging readers to prioritize truth-seeking over emotional or
ideological biases.

Scan to Download
Chapter 8 Summary : Call to Action

CHAPTER EIGHT: Call to Action

Introduction

- This chapter emphasizes the importance of speaking out

against the gradual erosion of core values and reason in
society, highlighting Martin Niemöller’s quote about the
consequences of silence in the face of injustice.

Engagement in the Battle of Ideas

- A larger group advocating for reason is more effective than

a smaller one. Many remain silent due to ignorance, apathy,
or the bystander effect, believing others will speak up.
- Every individual's voice matters; do not succumb to
collective inaction or fear of repercussions.

Activism as a Student and Citizen

- Challenge illiberal ideas in academic settings; use social

Scan to Download
media to offer alternative viewpoints; withdraw financial
support from institutions undermining free speech.
- Participate actively in discussions, even at the risk of
strained relationships.

The Value of Your Voice

- Social media has democratized the public discourse; every

voice contributes to the collective fight for reason, regardless
of initial platform size. Successful individuals have turned to
self-publishing and independent media to share their ideas.

Judgment and Fortitude in Friendships

- True friendships can withstand disagreement; avoiding

difficult conversations diminishes the quality of connections.
- Judging others is a natural part of decision-making;
opinions should be based on sound reasoning, not moral
cowardice or fear of offhand judgments.

Rejecting Virtue-Signaling

- Criticizing superficial acts of solidarity is essential; real

courage involves risk and standing against ideologies that

Scan to Download
threaten freedoms. Genuine actions bear weight, unlike
hollow gestures.

Intellectual Courage in Universities

- Universities must resist anti-science ideas and promote free

speech, encouraging rigorous debate rather than coddling
students.
- Emphasizing meritocracy over identity politics and
rejecting grade inflation will restore the value of education.

Conclusion

- The chapter reinforces the necessity for individuals to

engage in discussions, defend the values of the
Enlightenment, and participate actively in conversations that
shape society’s future. The pursuit of truth and the defense of
reason are crucial for creating a free society.

Scan to Download
Best Quotes from The Parasitic Mind by
Gad Saad with Page Numbers
View on Bookey Website and Generate Beautiful Quote Images

Chapter 1 | Quotes From Pages 12-30

1.I am also the product of my unique life trajectory
shaped by two wars.
2.The ideals that drive my life are freedom and truth, and any
attack on these ideals represents an existential threat to all
that I hold dear.
3.The pursuit of freedom is also at the root of my professorial
career.
4.The quest for truth should always supersede one’s
ego-defensive desire to be proven right.
5.It became clear to me during my doctoral training that
much of the social sciences were bereft of biological-based
thinking.
6.The proliferation of many of these bad ideas has yielded
reward mechanisms in academia that are upside down.
Chapter 2 | Quotes From Pages 31-46

Scan to Download
1.I always felt that a scientist owes the world only
one thing, and that is the truth as he sees it. If the
truth contradicts deeply held beliefs, that is too
bad.” —Hans J. Eysenck
2.Nature versus nurture is dead.” —Matt Ridley
3.Fuck your feelings.” —Gad Saad
4.…the pursuit of truth must rely on facts and not feelings.
5.Much of the lunacy that we see from the 'progressive' camp
is a result of consequentialism when it comes to the truth.
Chapter 3 | Quotes From Pages 47-70
1.But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of
an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race;
posterity as well as the existing generation; those
who dissent from the opinion, still more than those
who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are
deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error
for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as
great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier
impression of truth, produced by its collision with

Scan to Download
 error.” —John Stuart Mill
2.If knowledge is power, then these social media giants are
nearly all-powerful when they decide which information
we can have and whether we can be allowed a social media
platform.
3.As a libertarian, I am a fervent proponent of small
government. I despise the never-ending and ever-increasing
governmental encroachments into our daily lives. But it
seems obvious that these online companies must be
regulated as utilities.
4.Self-censorship is the greatest scourge to free speech.
5.There is simply no better alternative than to allow those
with unpopular views to express them and to allow those
wishing to hear them to do so.
6.Freedom is never more than one generation away from
extinction.” —Ronald Reagan

Scan to Download
Chapter 4 | Quotes From Pages 71-91
1.Those who can make you believe absurdities can
make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
2.To elevate one’s 'self-identity' above reality is hardly
liberating. It is a rejection of truth.
3.I argued that my areas of teaching and research expertise,
namely the application of evolutionary psychology to the
behavioral sciences, could easily be construed as violating
Bill C-16.
4.Detractors of the penis–climate change hoax paper argued
that this was hardly convincing given that the journal that
accepted the paper (Cogent Social Sciences) was a
pay-to-publish predatory outlet possessing little if any
academic prestige.
5.Life is about navigating a maze of opportunity costs. If you
are going to spend years studying in university, spending
your parents’ hard-earned money on exorbitant tuition fees,
perhaps you should refrain from studying critical race
theory, intersectional feminism, queer theory, and

Scan to Download
 postmodernism.
Chapter 5 | Quotes From Pages 92-115
1.I’m a liberal professor and my liberal students
terrify me. I have intentionally adjusted my
teaching as the political winds have shifted.…
Hurting a student’s feelings, even in the course of
instruction that is absolutely appropriate and
respectful, can now get a teacher into serious
trouble.” —Edward Schlosser
2.The tyranny of the minority is infinitely more odious and
intolerable and more to be feared than that of the majority.”
—President William McKinley
3.Using your brain to navigate the real world should not
entail a trigger warning. This course will assume that you
possess the cognitive and emotional acuity of an adult. Life
is your trigger warning.
4.Trigger warnings infantilize human resilience by coddling
young adults into thinking that they do not possess the
psychological strength to face life.

Scan to Download
5.Social justice activism trumps the quest for truth.
Chapter 6 | Quotes From Pages 116-133
1.Most men would rather deny a hard truth than
face it.” —George R. R. Martin
2.The easiest way to solve a problem is to deny it exists.”
—Isaac Asimov
3.The human brain can protect us from seeing and feeling
what it believes may be too uncomfortable for us to
tolerate. It can lead us to deny, defend, minimize, or
rationalize away something that doesn’t fit our worldview.”
—Bandy X. Lee
4.This disorder causes a person to reject realities that are
otherwise as clear as the existence of gravity.
5.One wonders why Chile has not produced a greater number
of terrorists given that one of the most arid places on earth
is its Atacama Desert.
6.The idea that unrestrained diversity is a magical elixir
when it comes to creating stable and peaceful societies is a
profoundly imbecilic notion.

Scan to Download
Chapter 7 | Quotes From Pages 134-160
1.One of the most salient features of our culture is
that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows
this.” —Harry G. Frankfurt
2.Reason, we argue, has two main functions: that of
producing reasons for justifying oneself, and that of
producing arguments to convince others.” —Hugo Mercier
and Dan Sperber
3.Philosophers have offered many frameworks to define
truth. Mathematical proofs, for instance, are axiomatic
truths. Empirical truths, on the other hand, are sought via
the scientific method.
4.A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him
you disagree, and he turns away. Show him facts or figures,
and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic, and he fails
to see your point.
5.Once the enemies of truth are presented with these
nomological networks of cumulative evidence, they
typically quietly nod in defeated resignation. Your feelings

Scan to Download
 cannot protect you from the truth.
6.Nomological networks of cumulative evidence constitute a
powerful means by which we can synthesize complex
information in our quest to make rational decisions.
Chapter 8 | Quotes From Pages 161-178
1.First they came for the communists, and I did not
speak out— Because I was not a communist. Then
they came for the trade unionists, and I did not
speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak
out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for
me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”
—Martin Niemöller, German theologian
2.A time comes when silence is betrayal.” —As quoted by
Martin Luther King Jr.
3.You have agency. Participate. Do not be a bystander as
truth, reason, and logic call out for your help.
4.Believe in the Power of Your Voice
5.True friendships are precisely those that should withstand

Scan to Download
 the stress of such conversations.
6.To judge is to be human. It is perfectly natural to judge
others.
7.Cowardice should be added to the list of seven deadly sins.
8.Never back down from those seeking to intimidate you into
silence.
9.In the grand battle of ideas for the soul of the West, you
have the power to effect necessary change.
10.March on, soldiers of reason. Together we can win the
battle of ideas.

Scan to Download
The Parasitic Mind Questions
View on Bookey Website

Chapter 1 | From Civil War to the Battle of Ideas|

Q&A
1.Question
Why does the author choose to tackle difficult issues
outside his scientific niche?
Answer:The author believes that freedom and truth
are core ideals that must be defended. His personal
history, particularly his experiences during the
Lebanese Civil War, has shaped his disdain for
groupthink and identity politics. He feels an
existential obligation to confront attacks on these
ideals.

2.Question
How did the Lebanese Civil War influence the author's
perspective on identity politics?
Answer:The Lebanese Civil War exposed the author to the
dangers of tribalism and religious dogma, leading him to
reject identity politics which, in his view, prioritizes group

Scan to Download
affiliation over individuality.

3.Question
What lesson did the author learn from being a Jewish boy
in Lebanon?
Answer:He learned the harsh reality of societal hatred and
scapegoating, which instilled in him a lasting awareness of
the existential dangers posed by group-based animosity.

4.Question
What does the author mean by 'the death of the West by a
thousand cuts'?
Answer:This phrase encapsulates the gradual erosion of
Western values like freedom, reason, and scientific inquiry
due to various ideological movements that promote political
correctness and suppress open discourse.

5.Question
Can you summarize the author's twin ideals that guide
his life?
Answer:The author’s life is guided by two principles:
freedom—both personally and academically—and truth,
underscoring the necessity of critical thinking and intellectual

Scan to Download
honesty.

6.Question
Why does the author view universities as both sources of
truth and intellectual garbage?
Answer:While universities have the potential to produce and
disseminate scientific truths, they also harbor ideologies (like
postmodernism and social constructivism) that can promote
unfounded claims and anti-scientific thinking.

7.Question
What events led to the author's family's immigration to
Canada?
Answer:Their immigration was precipitated by the escalating
violence and risks posed to their lives in Lebanon during the
Civil War, particularly a frightening experience with a former
service provider who threatened them.

8.Question
How does the author describe his childhood experiences
and their impact?
Answer:The author recounts traumatic events such as
witnessing calls for violence against Jews, which shaped his

Scan to Download
worldview. These experiences fostered a strong commitment
to the ideals of freedom and truth.

9.Question
What does the author believe is necessary to combat the
'parasitic viruses of the human mind'?
Answer:He advocates for a two-step approach: providing
accurate information and teaching individuals to process
information scientifically and logically.

10.Question
What role do social media and public engagement play in
the author's academic philosophy?
Answer:The author views social media as a vital tool for
disseminating knowledge widely and thinks that engagement
with the public is a crucial part of a professor's
responsibilities.
Chapter 2 | Thinking versus Feeling, Truth versus
HurtFeelings| Q&A
1.Question
What central theme emerges in the discussion of thinking
versus feeling?

Scan to Download
Answer:The central theme is that thinking
(cognitive processes) and feeling (emotional
processes) are not mutually exclusive; instead, they
both play crucial roles in decision-making. Effective
reasoning involves knowing when to engage each
system appropriately.

2.Question
How does Gad Saad differentiate between the marketing
of hedonic products versus utilitarian products?
Answer:For hedonic products like perfumes, emotional
appeal is paramount, often featuring romantic or fantasy
elements. In contrast, utilitarian products like mutual funds
rely on logical arguments and factual content to persuade
consumers.

3.Question
What does the term 'epistemological dichotomania' mean,
and why is it considered problematic?
Answer:Epistemological dichotomania refers to the tendency
to oversimplify complex phenomena into binary categories.

Scan to Download
It is problematic because it ignores the nuanced interactions
between factors, such as nature versus nurture, thereby
limiting our understanding.

4.Question
What does Saad suggest about the role of emotions in
decision-making?
Answer:Saad posits that emotions are evolutionarily
advantageous and often guide decisions. However, he
emphasizes that they should not overshadow rational
analysis, especially in contexts that require objective
evaluations, such as politics or science.

5.Question
How does the author view the relationship between truth
and feelings in contemporary society?
Answer:The author argues that there is an increasing
tendency in society to prioritize feelings over objective
truths. He cites examples from academia and politics,
illustrating how this shift undermines the pursuit of
knowledge and free expression.

Scan to Download
6.Question
What was the significance of the case of Geert Wilders
mentioned in the text?
Answer:The case of Geert Wilders serves as a troubling
example of how criticizing a religion can lead to legal
repercussions based on perceived hate speech. It highlights
the dangerous implications of allowing subjective feelings to
dictate the boundaries of free speech.

7.Question
How did the narrative around Donald Trump's election
reflect emotional responses rather than rational
evaluations?
Answer:The narrative surrounding Trump's election was rife
with exaggerated emotional responses, viewing his election
as a catastrophic threat. Saad illustrates that many detractors
failed to analyze voters' rational motivations grounded in
specific policy preferences.

8.Question
What does Saad mean by 'forbidden knowledge,' and how
does it relate to contemporary academic discourse?

Scan to Download
Answer:Forbidden knowledge refers to research topics or
ideas that are deemed too politically sensitive to explore
openly. This concept illustrates the chilling effect on
academic freedom and discourse, where valid inquiries are
suppressed in favor of ideological conformity.

9.Question
What are deontological and consequentialist ethics, and
how do they relate to the pursuit of truth?
Answer:Deontological ethics maintains that certain actions
are inherently right or wrong, focusing on moral absolutes
like truth-telling. Consequentialist ethics evaluates actions
based on their outcomes, allowing for potential truth
suppression if it spares feelings. Saad argues for a
deontological commitment to truth.

10.Question
Why does Saad criticize the emotional reactions to
political figures and events, particularly regarding
Kavanaugh?
Answer:Saad criticizes the emotional reactions to Kavanaugh
as a demonstration of how political tribalism can distort

Scan to Download
rational analysis. He argues that this emotional lens leads to a
loss of fair judgment and a departure from legal principles
like the presumption of innocence.

11.Question
What does the concept of ‘emotional incontinence’ signify
according to Theodore Dalrymple as cited by Saad?
Answer:Emotional incontinence refers to the excessive and
uncontrolled expression of emotions in contemporary
society, suggesting that emotional displays often substitute
for rigorous reasoning, leading to a culture where emotional
responses overshadow rational discourse.
Chapter 3 | Non-Negotiable Elements of a Free
andModern Society| Q&A
1.Question
What might be the consequence of silencing differing
opinions according to John Stuart Mill?
Answer:Silencing differing opinions robs society of
the chance to exchange error for truth, depriving
both those who dissent and those who hold the
opinion itself of growth in understanding and

Scan to Download
knowledge.

2.Question
What are two key features that define a truly liberal and
modern society, as posited by Gad Saad?
Answer:The guaranteed right to debate ideas (freedom of
speech and thought) and a commitment to using reason and
science (the scientific method) to test competing ideas.

3.Question
How do social media companies impact free speech
according to the author?
Answer:Social media companies possess immense power
over information control, often censoring content and voices
based on political biases or user behavior, which can
suppress free speech on a large scale.

4.Question
Why is self-censorship considered a problem in
academia?
Answer:Self-censorship creates a chilling effect, where
individuals fear repercussions for expressing unpopular
opinions, stifling open dialogue and debate in academic

Scan to Download
settings.

5.Question
What does the author suggest about the correlation
between political orientation and free speech in
universities?
Answer:There is a systemic bias in universities against
conservative viewpoints, resulting in a lack of ideological
diversity, consequently restricting open and free discussion
regarding varied political and social issues.

6.Question
What is the author's stance on the concept of 'hate
speech' laws?
Answer:The author argues that hate speech laws are a threat
to free expression, as they can be manipulated to suppress
dissenting views under the guise of protecting sensitivity.

7.Question
Can you summarize the idea conveyed by the quotes
about 'satire' in the text?
Answer:Satire is a crucial form of critique in free societies,
as it exposes truths and challenges ideas by mocking them,

Scan to Download
which should be tolerated even when the ideas are unpopular.

8.Question
According to Saad, why is intellectual diversity essential
in academic settings?
Answer:Intellectual diversity promotes critical thinking and
healthy debate, which are necessary for the development of
sound argumentation and the pursuit of truth.

9.Question
What warning does Ronald Reagan give about freedom?
Answer:Freedom is always just one generation away from
extinction, requiring active defense and transmission to
future generations to avoid losing the liberties that currently
exist.

10.Question
How does Gad Saad define the relationship between
science and identity politics?
Answer:Saad contends that science should be apolitical and
based on truth, which is undermined by identity politics that
prioritize group identities over empirical evidence.

Scan to Download
Chapter 4 | Anti-Science, Anti-Reason, and
IlliberalMovements| Q&A
1.Question
What are idea pathogens, and how do they function in
academic settings?
Answer:Idea pathogens are ideologies that distort
scientific understanding and promote subjective
perceptions of truth over objective reality. In
academic settings, they manifest as movements like
postmodernism, which suggests that reality is
subjective and all truths are relative. This mindset
undermines scientific inquiry and encourages
adherence to beliefs that reject established biological
and factual evidence.

2.Question
How does postmodernism impact our understanding of
gender and sex differences?
Answer:Postmodernism leads to the idea that gender and sex
are mere social constructs rather than rooted in biological
realities. It propagates beliefs such as there being no inherent

Scan to Download
differences between men and women, which contradicts
substantial evidence of evolved differences in abilities,
interests, and talents.

3.Question
Can you explain the concept of a 'blank slate' when it
comes to human behavior?
Answer:The 'blank slate' concept posits that humans are born
without any innate traits, suggesting that behavior is entirely
shaped by the environment. This view ignores biological and
evolutionary evidence that indicates humans have distinct
capabilities and predispositions that can influence behavior
from birth onward.

4.Question
What is meant by the 'tyranny of the minority' in the
context of gender identity debates?
Answer:The 'tyranny of the minority' refers to the situation
where the rights or feelings of a small group (such as
transgender individuals) are prioritized over the rights of
others (like biological women in competitive sports). This

Scan to Download
can lead to conflicts where individual self-identities are
elevated above observable biological truths.

5.Question
How does satire serve as a critique of contemporary
ideologies according to Gad Saad?
Answer:Gad Saad uses satire to expose the absurdities and
logical inconsistencies in contemporary ideologies,
particularly those surrounding gender identity and feminist
narratives. By exaggerating claims, such as identifying as a
different age or weight, he highlights the ridiculousness of
rejecting biological realities and encourages critical
examination of these beliefs.

6.Question
What warnings does Gad Saad provide about the
consequences of rejecting biological truths?
Answer:Saad warns that rejecting biological truths in favor
of ideological beliefs can lead to dangerous consequences,
such as the erosion of scientific inquiry and the potential loss
of women's rights in various domains through policies that

Scan to Download
prioritize subjective identities over biological facts.

7.Question
In what ways does contemporary feminism, according to
Saad, perpetuate a false narrative of victimhood?
Answer:Contemporary feminism is critiqued by Saad for
presenting women as perpetual victims, ignoring
socioeconomic factors that affect both genders, and failing to
acknowledge men's struggles. This victimhood narrative
relegates men to being oppressors, thereby fostering division
rather than cooperation.

8.Question
What is the significance of the Grievance Studies Project
mentioned in the chapter?
Answer:The Grievance Studies Project underscores the
pervasive absurdity in modern academia by revealing how
nonsensical papers can be accepted for publication by
reputable journals when they conform to the politicized
frameworks of social justice and postmodernism, showcasing
a disregard for genuine scholarly rigor.

Scan to Download
9.Question
How does Saad view the implications of politically correct
language on free discourse?
Answer:Saad views politically correct language as a tool that
suppresses free discourse and critical thought in academia.
By promoting an environment where dissent or critical
examination of progressive ideologies is discouraged,
universities cultivate a culture of conformity and intellectual
stagnation.

10.Question
What caution does Saad express regarding the future of
scientific discourse?
Answer:Saad warns that as ideologies like postmodernism
and radical feminism gain traction, scientific discourse may
increasingly be drowned out by subjective beliefs. This could
lead to a future where academic integrity is compromised,
and scientific facts are subordinate to ideological narratives.
Chapter 5 | Campus Lunacy: The Rise of the Social
JusticeWarrior| Q&A
1.Question

Scan to Download
How do social justice warriors (SJWs) create a culture
around victimhood?
Answer:SJWs create a culture around victimhood
by emphasizing the importance of feelings over
facts, leading to a competitive environment known
as the 'Oppression Olympics.' Here, individuals
identify as members of oppressed groups to claim a
higher status in a victimhood hierarchy, often
articulated through identity politics. This
competitive stance encourages individuals to always
project a sense of grievance, often manipulating the
definitions of oppression to ensure they are seen as
victims.

2.Question
Why are trigger warnings and safe spaces criticized in
academic settings?
Answer:Trigger warnings and safe spaces are criticized
because they promote a culture of emotional fragility, which
stifles open discourse and critical thinking. These practices

Scan to Download
reportedly prevent students from encountering challenging
ideas, leading to a generation that is ill-prepared to deal with
differing viewpoints. Saad argues that for healthy emotional
and intellectual development, students must be exposed to,
and learn to navigate through, discomfort and dissenting
opinions.

3.Question
What does the term 'Collective Munchausen' refer to in
the context of this chapter?
Answer:Collective Munchausen refers to a phenomenon
where individuals or groups seek to gain sympathy and
attention by presenting themselves or others as victims, often
exaggerating or feigning experiences of victimhood. This
behavior is likened to the psychiatric condition Munchausen
Syndrome, where one fakes illness. In today’s context, it's
about leveraging perceived victim status for social
advantage.

4.Question
How does Saad characterize the relationship between
identity politics and academic discourse?

Scan to Download
Answer:Saad characterizes the relationship between identity
politics and academic discourse as detrimental, with the
former often superseding truthful debate and intellectual
growth. He argues that universities should focus on
promoting knowledge and encouraging diversity of thought,
but instead, they are often consumed by minimizing
discomfort among certain identities, which stifles open
inquiry and the pursuit of truth.

5.Question
What warning does Saad give about the implications of
infinite tolerance?
Answer:Saad warns that infinite tolerance, as proposed by
some progressives, could lead to the erosion of genuine
tolerance, especially towards intolerant ideologies. He
emphasizes that to maintain a tolerant society, there must be
boundaries set against ideas that seek to undermine or
destroy tolerance itself. Without this vigilance, those who
hold intolerant views may exploit tolerance to gain sway,
ultimately compromising the freedoms of all.

Scan to Download
6.Question
What are some societal consequences of the 'homeostasis
of victimology' mentioned in the chapter?
Answer:The homeostasis of victimology can lead to a culture
where victim narratives become exaggerated or even
manufactured to maintain a perceived level of oppression,
which distorts reality and diminishes genuine instances of
harm or discrimination. This can encourage a perpetual cycle
of grievance, erode trust in public narratives, and foster
division within society by continually reframing ordinary
interactions through a lens of victimhood.

7.Question
How does Saad connect the concept of self-loathing to
progressivism?
Answer:Saad connects self-loathing to progressivism by
explaining that many progressives, especially privileged
individuals, engage in a form of ideological self-flagellation
to atone for their perceived 'original sin' of being part of an
oppressive class (whiteness, privilege). This self-loathing

Scan to Download
manifests in extreme forms of activism that often undermine
their own wellbeing and the wellbeing of society, as they
express guilt and shame over societal structures rather than
working towards constructive change.

8.Question
What is the impact of cultural appropriation claims on
societal interactions, according to Saad?
Answer:According to Saad, claims of cultural appropriation
hinder the richness of multicultural engagement by creating
an environment of fear and accusation. This leads to a stifling
of creativity and expression, as individuals may hesitate to
explore or celebrate diverse cultures for fear of being labeled
appropriators. Saad posits that such an environment
ultimately undermines true appreciation and understanding
between cultures, as individuals become overly sensitive and
reactive.

9.Question
Why does Saad argue that emotional coddling is harmful
to young adults?

Scan to Download
Answer:Saad argues that emotional coddling, such as
through trigger warnings and safe spaces, harms young adults
by preventing them from developing resilience and critical
thinking skills essential for navigating the complexities of
real life. He asserts that by shielding individuals from
discomfort, we deny them the opportunity to fortify their
emotional and intellectual defenses, which could leave them
ill-equipped to handle the challenges they will inevitably face
in adult life.

10.Question
What examples does Saad give to illustrate the absurdity
of progressive positions?
Answer:Saad illustrates the absurdity of progressive
positions through numerous examples, such as controversies
surrounding Halloween costumes being deemed offensive,
the backlash against individuals for perceived cultural
appropriation in mundane contexts, and extreme reactions to
non-violent expressions of dissent. Notably, he describes
incidents where even innocuous acts, like wearing traditional

Scan to Download
cultural attire or enjoying foods from different cultures,
attract severe criticism under the guise of protecting
marginalized identities.
Chapter 6 | Departures from Reason: Ostrich
ParasiticSyndrome| Q&A
1.Question
What is the Ostrich Parasitic Syndrome (OPS) as
described in Chapter 6?
Answer:Ostrich Parasitic Syndrome (OPS) is a
cognitive disorder where individuals reject clear
realities, akin to an ostrich burying its head in the
sand. Those afflicted construct an alternate reality
where established scientific truths and common
sense are ignored, leading to a preference for
illogical reasoning and delusional connections
between events.

2.Question
How can self-deception be beneficial yet detrimental to
individuals?
Answer:Self-deception can protect individuals from

Scan to Download
confronting uncomfortable truths, allowing them to maintain
their worldview and avoid distress. However, it can also lead
to harmful consequences, such as ignoring real problems
(like health issues or societal dangers) which can escalate
over time.

3.Question
What parallels does Saad draw between historical figures
like Trofim Lysenko and modern anti-vaccine activists?
Answer:Saad parallels Trofim Lysenko's rejection of
established genetic theories with modern anti-vaccine
proponents who deny scientific consensus on vaccine safety
in favor of erroneous beliefs, often because of personal or
ideological motivations that reject uncomfortable truths.

4.Question
Why do individuals frequently resort to fallacious
reasoning as described in OPS?
Answer:Individuals resort to fallacious reasoning to protect
themselves from cognitive dissonance; by fabricating logical
connections that fit their beliefs, they can avoid facing

Scan to Download
realities that challenge their worldview, often due to social
pressures or personal emotional investment in those beliefs.

5.Question
How does Saad critique the idea that increased diversity
is universally beneficial?
Answer:Saad critiques the notion by arguing that while
diversity can enrich culture superficially, it can pose
significant challenges when cultural values are
fundamentally illiberal, noting that diversity without a
requirement for assimilation into common values can lead to
social instability and conflict.

6.Question
In what ways does Saad suggest the principle of
Ockham's Razor relates to understanding social issues?
Answer:Saad uses Ockham's Razor to argue that simple
explanations for social problems, which consider basic
human behaviors and values, should be preferred over
convoluted and overly complex analyses that ignore
foundational realities, thus advocating for clarity and

Scan to Download
directness in addressing societal challenges.

7.Question
What specific cognitive biases does Saad mention that
contribute to the perpetuation of OPS?
Answer:Saad mentions biases such as the law of instrument
(where people apply familiar solutions to problems), illusory
correlations (drawing false links between unrelated events),
and selective anecdotal evidence (favoring personal stories
over aggregate data) as mechanisms that help sustain Ostrich
Parasitic Syndrome.

8.Question
How does the author connect the themes of oppression
and ideology in discussing the challenges of immigration
policies?
Answer:Saad argues that the failure to scrutinize immigration
policies is linked to a cultural ideology that prioritizes
diversity over the assimilation of democratic values, leading
to potential conflicts within society and undermining the core
principles of Western liberalism.

9.Question

Scan to Download
What implications does OPS have on scientific and
societal discourse, according to Saad?
Answer:OPS threatens both scientific and societal discourse
by fostering an environment where ideological beliefs
overshadow factual evidence. This can lead to widespread
acceptance of falsehoods, escalation of public health threats
(like the anti-vaccine movement), and the inability to engage
in rational discussions about pressing societal issues.

10.Question
What preventative measures does Saad suggest to combat
the effects of OPS?
Answer:Saad suggests emphasizing the importance of
scientific literacy, critical thinking, and encouraging
individuals to confront uncomfortable truths rather than
dismissing them. Engaging in open dialogue, promoting
evidence-based policies, and reducing reliance on anecdotal
narratives in scientific discussions are seen as crucial steps
forward.

Scan to Download
Chapter 7 | How to Seek Truth: Nomological
Networks ofCumulative Evidence| Q&A
1.Question
What is a fundamental duty of an individual in a free
society according to Chapter 7?
Answer:To be an informed citizen on issues of
societal importance.

2.Question
What is meant by 'cognitive dissonance' as discussed in
the chapter?
Answer:The difficulty individuals face in changing their
minds when confronted with opposing evidence, often
leading to defensive reasoning.

3.Question
How does the 'arguementative theory of reasoning' differ
from traditional views on seeking truth?
Answer:It suggests that our reasoning faculties evolved more
to convince ourselves and others than to seek the objective
truth.

4.Question

Scan to Download
What is 'testicular fortitude' in the context of the
chapter?
Answer:Intellectual courage necessary for engaging in
meaningful discussions about ideas.

5.Question
What is the significance of nomological networks of
cumulative evidence?
Answer:They provide a coherent way to synthesize
information from diverse sources and build strong
arguments.

6.Question
What role do empirical truths play in establishing
knowledge?
Answer:Empirical truths are established through the
scientific method and become part of the core knowledge in a
field.

7.Question
According to the chapter, how do societal beliefs affect the
acceptance of scientific ideas?
Answer:Established beliefs can create resistance to new

Scan to Download
ideas, especially if they threaten existing paradigms.

8.Question
What is the example given to illustrate how nomological
networks can disprove social constructivist arguments
about gender roles?
Answer:Research showing that infants exhibit sex-specific
toy preferences indicates these preferences are biologically
based rather than socially constructed.

9.Question
How do nomological networks address counterarguments
against a thesis?
Answer:They anticipate potential criticisms and provide
comprehensive evidence from various fields to support their
conclusions.

10.Question
What conclusion does Saad reach regarding the
relationships between major religions and the tolerance
or intolerance within societies?
Answer:The chapter presents that the spread and structure of
Islam as a memeplex can lead to higher instances of

Scan to Download
intolerance and violence compared to other religions.

11.Question
Why is it important to apply nomological networks when
dealing with complex issues such as climate change?
Answer:They help synthesize complex information and avoid
emotionally charged narratives, allowing for rational and
informed decision-making.

12.Question
What ultimate advice does Saad give regarding forming
positions on controversial topics?
Answer:To rely on cumulative evidence and logic rather than
emotions or tribal ideologies.
Chapter 8 | Call to Action| Q&A
1.Question
What are the dangers of remaining silent in the face of
ideological threats?
Answer:Remaining silent allows anti-science and
illiberal movements to proliferate unchecked,
leading to the gradual erosion of freedom and
reason. Just like the poem by Niemöller illustrates,

Scan to Download
silence can lead to a time when no one remains to
speak for you, as your rights and freedoms are
gradually stripped away. Everyone has a stake in
the outcome of these ideological battles, as they can
ultimately affect all of us.

2.Question
How can individuals develop a sense of personal
responsibility in defending core values?
Answer:Individuals can develop a sense of personal
responsibility by recognizing their agency in the battle of
ideas. Instead of diffusing responsibility to others, they
should speak out against injustices, challenge erroneous
beliefs, and engage in discussions that matter. Every voice
counts, and by participating actively, individuals contribute
to the collective defense of reason and truth.

3.Question
What strategies can people use to engage in difficult
discussions without fear?
Answer:To engage in difficult discussions, individuals should

Scan to Download
focus on constructive and respectful disagreement. They can
frame their arguments well and be prepared to challenge
opinions that differ from theirs, all while maintaining
decorum. It is essential to prioritize friendships that can
withstand these discussions and to remember that true friends
value the exchange of ideas, even if it leads to discomfort.

4.Question
What is virtue signaling and why is it ineffective?
Answer:Virtue signaling is the act of expressing opinions or
sentiments aimed at showcasing one's moral correctness,
typically without any real commitment to action. It is
ineffective because it does not translate into meaningful
change or support; it merely serves to boost one's ego while
being passive. True courage involves taking action and
facing consequences instead of simply performing moral
superiority.

5.Question
How does courage play a role in the battle of ideas?
Answer:Courage is essential in the battle of ideas as it

Scan to Download
empowers individuals to speak out against prevailing dogmas
and face potential backlash. Intellectual courage involves not
only expressing one's thoughts but also standing firm under
scrutiny. Just as soldiers show courage on the battlefield,
those engaged in ideological fights must also possess the
fortitude to defend their beliefs in the face of opposition.

6.Question
What lessons can be drawn from the discussion of
judgment in relationships?
Answer:Judgment is an integral part of human interactions
and is necessary for establishing meaningful relationships.
Deep conversations require the ability to evaluate ideas
critically, and those who are unwilling to engage in such
discussions may not be worthy of close friendships. True
connections thrive on honest dialogues where both
individuals can express differing views.

7.Question
What are the implications of lowering academic
standards in universities?

Scan to Download
Answer:Lowering academic standards leads to a culture of
mediocrity where critical thinking is not cultivated, and
intellectual challenges are avoided. This watering down of
education fosters entitlement and prepares students poorly for
real-world challenges, making them less resilient in
navigating complex ideologies and unprepared for rigorous
debate in the broader societal context.

8.Question
How can individuals channel their inner honey badger in
the face of ideological bullying?
Answer:Like the fearless honey badger, individuals should
stand their ground against intimidation and bullying. This
involves not ceding an inch to ideological bullies, defending
their stance confidently, and utilizing existing social
dynamics to counteract aggressive tactics. The honey badger
serves as a metaphor for resilience and determination in
upholding one’s beliefs amidst opposition.

9.Question
What can people do to challenge the toxic elements
present in modern education?

Scan to Download
Answer:People can challenge toxic elements in education by
advocating for the return to meritocratic principles, fighting
against unconstitutional speech codes, and promoting the free
exchange of ideas on campuses. This means engaging with
diverse viewpoints and encouraging environments that
stimulate intellectual growth rather than fragility.

Scan to Download
The Parasitic Mind Quiz and Test
Check the Correct Answer on Bookey Website

Chapter 1 | From Civil War to the Battle of Ideas|

Quiz and Test
1.Gad Saad's upbringing in Lebanon significantly
influenced his views on groupthink and identity
politics.
2.Saad views universities as entirely dedicated to the pursuit
of scientific truth and intellectual freedom.
3.Saad compares harmful ideologies to biological pathogens
that infect the mind and hinder critical thinking.
Chapter 2 | Thinking versus Feeling, Truth versus
HurtFeelings| Quiz and Test
1.The chapter emphasizes that pursuing the truth
should never be constrained by political
correctness.
2.The author supports the idea that emotional responses
should dominate reasoning in political contexts.
3.The tension between emotion and rationality does not

Scan to Download
 influence consumer behavior according to the chapter.
Chapter 3 | Non-Negotiable Elements of a Free
andModern Society| Quiz and Test
1.John Stuart Mill emphasized that silencing
opinions can harm human development and void
opportunities for truth.
2.Saad believes that social media companies should operate
without any regulations to maintain free speech.
3.Saad posits that identity politics enhance scientific
discourse by promoting demographic representation over
meritocracy.

Scan to Download
Chapter 4 | Anti-Science, Anti-Reason, and
IlliberalMovements| Quiz and Test
1.Postmodernism claims that knowledge is objective
and absolute.
2.The Grievance Studies Project aimed to demonstrate the
ridiculousness of some ideologies by publishing fake
papers.
3.The chapter promotes the idea that human behaviors are
solely determined by genetics and denies any social
influences.
Chapter 5 | Campus Lunacy: The Rise of the Social
JusticeWarrior| Quiz and Test
1.Student-activist social justice warriors (SJWs) are
a majority on university campuses and have
negligible influence over university environments.
2.The 'Oppression Olympics' refers to individuals competing
for status within a victim hierarchy based on identity
politics.
3.Universities currently aim to maximize knowledge
acquisition, with no emphasis on social justice concerns.

Scan to Download
Chapter 6 | Departures from Reason: Ostrich
ParasiticSyndrome| Quiz and Test
1.Ostrich Parasitic Syndrome (OPS) is defined as a
disorder where individuals embrace clear realities
rather than constructed alternate realities.
2.The chapter critiques the notion that increased diversity
brings strength to a society, arguing that it can also lead to
challenges.
3.Saad asserts that rejecting profiling is a rational decision
that helps ensure safety and rational decision-making.

Scan to Download
Chapter 7 | How to Seek Truth: Nomological
Networks ofCumulative Evidence| Quiz and Test
1.Cognitive shortcuts and emotional biases can
hinder informed decision-making in a free society.
2.Cumulative evidence is irrelevant in establishing robust
scientific truths, as evidence from any one study is enough.
3.The chapter argues that personal biases of scientists may
affect their interpretation of scientific data.
Chapter 8 | Call to Action| Quiz and Test
1.The chapter emphasizes that every individual's
voice is unimportant when it comes to advocating
for reason and truth in society.
2.The chapter suggests that true friendships are strengthened
by avoiding difficult conversations about disagreements.
3.The chapter argues that universities should promote
anti-science ideas and prioritize identity politics over
meritocracy.

Scan to Download