0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views3 pages

Job Evaluation Methods

The document outlines various job evaluation methods including Ranking, Classification, Factor Comparison, and Point Method, detailing their advantages and disadvantages. Each method assesses job worth based on different criteria such as skill, responsibility, and working conditions, with subjective judgments potentially leading to biases. The Ranking method is simple but challenging with many jobs, while Classification allows easier integration of new jobs, and both Factor Comparison and Point Method provide monetary evaluations but may also be subjective.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views3 pages

Job Evaluation Methods

The document outlines various job evaluation methods including Ranking, Classification, Factor Comparison, and Point Method, detailing their advantages and disadvantages. Each method assesses job worth based on different criteria such as skill, responsibility, and working conditions, with subjective judgments potentially leading to biases. The Ranking method is simple but challenging with many jobs, while Classification allows easier integration of new jobs, and both Factor Comparison and Point Method provide monetary evaluations but may also be subjective.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

JOB EVALUATION METHODS

1) Ranking –
This method is one of the simplest to administer. Jobs are compared to each other
based on the overall worth of the job to the organization. The 'worth' of a job is usually
based on judgements of skill, effort (physical and mental), responsibility (supervisory
and fiscal), and working conditions.

Advantages :
* Simple.
* Very effective when there are relatively few jobs to be evaluated (less than 30).

Disadvantages :
* Difficult to administer as the number of jobs increases.
* Rank judgements are subjective.
* Since there is no standard used for comparison, new jobs would have to be compared
with the existing jobs to determine its appropriate rank. In essence, the ranking process
would have to be repeated each time a new job is added to the organization.

Ranking Methods-
* Ordering simply place job titles on 3x5 inch index cards then order the titles by relative
importance to the organization.
* Weighting
* Paired Comparison

ii) Classification –
Jobs are classified into an existing grade/category structure or hierarchy. Each level in
the grade/category structure has a description and associated job titles. Each job is
assigned to the grade/category providing the closest match to the job. The classification
of a position is decided by comparing the whole job with the appropriate job grading
standard. To ensure equity in job grading and wage rates, a common set of job grading
standards and instructions are used. Because of differences in duties, skills and
knowledge, and other aspects of trades and labor jobs, job grading standards are
developed mainly along occupational lines. The standards do not attempt to describe
every work assignment of each position in the occupation covered. The standards
identify and describe those key characteristics of occupations which are significant for
distinguishing different levels of work. They define these key characteristics in such a
way as to provide a basis for assigning the appropriate grade level to all positions in the
occupation to which the standards apply.
Advantages
* Simple.
* The grade/category structure exists independent of the jobs. Therefore, new jobs can
be classified more easily than the Ranking Method.

Disadvantages
* Classification judgments are subjective.
* The standard used for comparison (the grade/category structure) may have built in
biases that would affect certain groups of employees (females or minorities).
* Some jobs may appear to fit within more than one grade/category.

iii)Factor Comparison –
A set of compensable factors are identified as determining the worth of jobs. Typically
the number of compensable factors is small (4 or 5). Examples of compensable factors
are:
o Skill
o Responsibilities
o Effort
o Working Conditions Next, benchmark jobs are identified. Benchmark jobs
should be selected as having certain characteristics.
o equitable pay (not overpaid or underpaid)
o range of the factors (for each factor, some jobs would be at the low end of the
factor while others would be at the high end of the factor).

This process establishes the rate of pay for each factor for each benchmark job. Slight
adjustments may need o be made to the matrix to ensure equitable dollar weighting of
the factors. The other jobs in the organization are then compared with the benchmark
jobs and rates of pay for each factor are summed to determine the rates of pay for each
of the other jobs.

Advantages
o The value of the job is expressed in monetary terms.
o Can be applied to a wide range of jobs.
o Can be applied to newly created jobs.

Disadvantages
o The pay for each factor is based on judgements that are subjective.
o The standard used for determining the pay for each factor may have build in biases
that would affect certain groups of employees (females or minorities).
iv) Point Method –
A set of compensable factors are identified as determining the worth of jobs. Typically
the compensable factors include the major categories of:
* Skill
* Responsibilities
* Effort
* Working Conditions

These factors can then be further defined.


* Skill
* Experience
* Education
* Ability
* Responsibilities
* Fiscal
* Supervisory
* Effort
* Mental
* Physical
* Working Conditions
* Location
* Hazards
* Extremes in Environment

The point method is an extension of the factor comparison method. Each factor is then
divided into levels or degrees which are then assigned points. Each job is rated using
the job evaluation instrument. The points for each factor are summed to form a total
point score for the job. Jobs are then grouped by total point scores and assigned to
wage/salary grades so that similarly rated jobs would be placed in the same
wage/salary grade.

Advantages
+ The value of the job is expressed in monetary terms.
+ Can be applied to a wide range of jobs.
+ Can be applied to newly created jobs. Disadvantages
+ The pay for each factor is based on judgements that are subjective.
+ The standard used for determining the pay for each factor may have build in biases
that would affect certain groups of employees (females or minorities).

You might also like