History of global feminist traditions/movements

Globalization refers to the economic, social, cultural, and political processes of integration that result from
the expansion of transnational economic production, migration, communications, and technologies.

To understand the future of women, we must appreciate the history of feminist that has brought us to this
revolutionary movement. In the past two centuries, revolution has transformed women’s lives. Feminist
politics originated where capitalism, industrial growth, democratic theory and social critiques conveyed as
they did in Europe and North America. By 1900 an international women’s movement advanced these goals
in urban areas of Latin America, the Middle East and Asia. Since 1970 feminism has spread globally, in both
industrialized nations and in the developing regins too.i

Given their specific historical origins, the feminist politics initially forged in Europe and North America have
not simply expanded throughout the world. Elsewhere, abundant forms ii of women’s resistance to men’s
patriarchal authority predated western democratic theories; they continue to influence feminist movement
today. iii
By the year 200 these growing international movements to improve women’s lives increasingly
influenced each other, due in part to the forum provided by the United Nations Decade for women for 1975
to 1985 and the follow up conference in Beijing in 1995. While they share the conviction that women deserve
full human rights, international feminism often diverge in their emphasis. Only some concentrate solely on
women while others recognize complex links to the politics of race, class, religion and nationality. Despite
these differences, most western feminist have learned that global economic and political justice are
prerequisites to securing women’s rights. Women in the developing world have found that transnational
support for their efforts at home.iv

None of this feminist movement has proceeded without opposition, including formidable backlash in every
era in which women have gained public authority.

Nonetheless, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the historical conditions that promote feminism can
be found in different parts of the world. First coined in France in the 1880 as feminism, it spread through
European countries in the 1890 and to the north and south America by 1910. Western women’s movement
also significantly expanded their agendas after 1960. Along with the demand for economic and political
rights, women’s liberation revived a politics of difference through its critique of interpersonal relations.v

Debashis Baidya Page | 1

Feminist Theoretical Approaches to Globalization

‘Feminist theoretical approaches to globalization’ is an umbrella term that refers to a number of specific
theoretical approaches that feminists have used to clear the challenges that globalization poses for women,
people of color, and the global poor. These various approaches include those developed by postcolonial
feminists, transnational feminists, and feminists who endorse an ethics of care. In this section, we identify
four key features shared by these various feminist approaches to globalization and outline some of the
distinctive characteristics of each theoretical orientation.vi

Common Features

First, feminist approaches to globalization seek to provide frameworks for understanding the gender
injustices associated with globalization. Rather than developing all-encompassing ideal theories of global
justice, however, feminist philosophers tend to adopt the non-ideal theoretical perspectives, which focus on
specific, concrete issues. Early feminist analyses focused on issues that were widely believed to be of
particular importance to women around the world, such as domestic violence, workplace discrimination, and
human rights violations against women. While gendered analyses of these issues have provided valuable
insights into the distinctive nature of the harms involved, many feminist philosophers view this approach as
too narrow, both in terms of the specific issues it addresses and its methodological approach to these issues.vii
They contend that even apparently gender-neutral global issues often have a gendered dimension, including
war, global governance, migration, southern debt, and climate change. Although gender oppression takes
different forms in different social, cultural, and geographical locations, women in every society face
systematic disadvantages, such as those resulting from their socially assigned responsibility for domestic
work. Because of these structural injustices, women of all nationalities tend to suffer more from the poverty,
overwork, deprivation, and political marginalization associated with neoliberal policies. Thus, more recent
feminist analyses of globalization tend to understand the outcomes of globalization not as disparate or
contingent phenomena, but rather as a result of systematic, structural injustices on a global scale. Indeed,
some contend that the global basic structure itself is implicitly biased against women.viii

The second key feature of feminist approaches to globalization is a shared commitment to core feminist
values, including an opposition to the subordination of women. Some theorists also draw upon feminist
interpretations of mainstream moral and political ideals, such as equality, democracy, and human rights, to
develop critiques of neoliberal policies. However, not all feminist political philosophers agree with this
approach. Some believe that new feminist ideals, such as relational understandings of power, collective
responsibility, and mutual dependence, are needed to diagnose the gender injustices associated with

Debashis Baidya Page | 2

globalization.ix For instance, Iris Marion Young argues the traditional ideal theories of justice are unable to
account for the unjust background conditions that contribute to the development of sweatshops in the global
South. She argues that a new relational model of responsibility, which she calls the social connection model,
is needed to clear the obligations that people in rich northern countries have to workers in the global South.
The social connection model holds that individuals bear responsibility for structural injustices, such as those
suffered by workers on the global assembly line, because our actions contribute to the institutional processes
that produce such injustices. The third key feature of feminist approaches to globalization is an emphasis on
feminist methodologies. In particular, these approaches tend to embody three key methodological
commitments. The first is interring sectionalist, which maintains that systems of oppression interact to
produce injustices, and thus, that gender injustices cannot be understood solely in terms of sex or gender.
Feminists who theorize about justice on the domestic level argue that women's experiences of gender
oppression are shaped by other forms of oppression, such as those based on race, class, disability, and sexual
orientation. Feminist theorists of globalization contend that gender oppression interacts with these systems
of oppression, along with other forms of systematic disadvantage that arise within the global context. Salient
categories include nationality, geographical location, citizenship status, and socioeconomic position within
the global economy (for instance, as a Southern elite, a Western laborer, or a worker on the global assembly
line).x Given this broad conception of intersectionality, feminist theorists of globalization insist that gender
injustices arise within specific transnational contexts, such as historical relationships among nations and
current global economic policies.

The second methodological commitment shared by feminist approaches to globalization is a sensitivity to

context and concrete specificity. Feminist philosophers strive to accurately reflect the diverse interests,
experience, and concerns of women throughout the world, and to take seriously differences in culture,
history, and socio-economic and political circumstances. In this way, feminist approaches to globalization
attempt to move between local conditions and global pressures, between historical realities and contemporary
experiences of oppression and vulnerability, while being attentive to complex interactions among social,
economic, and political forces. Western perspectives and undermine their own commitment to reflecting
women's lived experience.xi

Finally, feminist theorists of globalization are committed to developing self-reflexive critiques. At the heart
of this methodology is a willingness to critically examine feminist claims, with particular attention to the
ways in which feminist discourses privilege certain points of view. For instance, Schutte insists that
ostensibly universal feminist values and ideas are likely to embody the values of dominant cultures. This
helps to explain why the voices of women from developing countries are often taken seriously only if they

Debashis Baidya Page | 3

reflect the norms and values of the West and conform to Western expectations. Thus, Schutte insists that
feminists must engage in methodological practices that de-center their habitual standpoints and foreground
perspectives that challenge accepted ways of thinking.xii

The struggle to develop feminist theories that embody these methodological commitments has been ongoing
for feminists. In the 1980s, Chandra Talpade Mohanty observed that Western feminist scholarship tends to
adopt an ethnocentric perspective, depicting so-called Third-World women as one-dimensional, non-agentic,
and homogenous. In her often-cited words, such scholarship tends to suggest that:the average Third World
woman leads an essentially truncated life based on her feminine gender (read: sexually constrained) and her
being “Third World” (read: ignorant, poor, uneducated, tradition-bound, domestic, family-oriented,
victimized, etc.). This is in contrast to the (implicit) self-representation of Western women as educated, as
modern, as having control over their own bodies and sexualities and the freedom to make their own
decisions.xiii

Distinctive Feminist Approaches

Despite these common aims and methodological commitments, feminists have analyzed globalization from
a number of different theoretical perspectives. Below, we examine three prominent approaches to
globalization, developed by postcolonial, transnational, and ethics of care feminists. Although it is not
possible to draw sharp boundaries around these theoretical perspectives, we identify some distinctive features
of each.xiv

Postcolonial and Third-World Feminismsxv

Postcolonial and Third-World feminisms offer primarily critical theoretical frameworks, which analyze
globalization within the context of the history of Western colonialism and imperialism. They begin with the
claim that Western colonialism and imperialism have played important roles in shaping the contemporary
world, and highlight their enduring effects on global relations and local cultural practices. Although
postcolonial and Third-World feminists write from all over the world, they foreground non-Western
epistemic standpoints and criticize North-South power asymmetries from the diverse perspectives of
members of the global South.

Postcolonial and Third-World feminists make several important claims. they insist that it is impossible to
understand local practices in developing countries without acknowledging the ways in which these practices
have been shaped by their economic and historical contexts, particularly their connection to Western
colonialism and imperialism.

Debashis Baidya Page | 4

Ethics of Care

Another prominent school of feminist theoretical responses to globalization puts care, both caring labor—
the work of caring for the young, old, sick, and disabled, and the everyday maintenance of households—and
the moral ideal of care, at the center of its analyses. Proponents of this approach begin by observing that most
mainstream analyses of globalization either ignore or devalue care. This is problematic, they argue, for at
least two reasons: care work, which is done almost exclusively by women, has been profoundly influenced
by globalization; and any viable alternative to neoliberal globalization must prioritize the moral ideal of care.
Thus, ethics of care approaches to globalization have both practical and theoretical dimensions. xvi

Transnational Feminism

In its broadest sense, transnational feminism maintains that globalization has created the conditions for
feminist solidarity across national borders. On the one hand, globalization has enabled transnational
processes that generate injustices for women in multiple geographical locations, such the global assembly
line (discussed below). Yet on the other, the technologies associated with globalization have created new
political spaces that enable feminist political resistance. Thus, transnational feminists incorporate the critical
insights of postcolonial, Third World and ethics of care feminists into a positive vision of transnational
feminist solidarity.

Transnational feminism is sometimes contrasted with global or international feminism, a second-wave theory
that emphasizes solidarity among women across national boundaries based on their common experience of
patriarchal oppression.

Issues

In addition to analyzing the gendered dimensions of globalization, feminist political philosophers discuss
specific issues that have been shaped by it. Below, we discuss four representative examples. First, we discuss
two issues associated with economic globalization—economic justice and migration—and then we turn to
two issues connected to political globalization—human rights and global governance.xvii

Economic Justice

It is widely argued that neoliberal policies have created dramatic economic inequalities, both between the
global North and global South and within countries in both hemispheres. One task for feminist political
philosophers has been to identify the ways in which these policies reinforce specific inequalities based on
gender, class, race, and nationality. In particular, feminists shed light on the disparate and often
disproportionately burdensome consequences of neoliberal policies for specific groups of women. An

Debashis Baidya Page | 5

additional, related task has been to identify the ways in which gendered practices and ideologies shape the
processes of globalization.xviii

Migrationxix

Migration has accelerated along with the globalization of the economy and women comprise a higher
proportion of migrants, especially labor migrants, than ever before. Feminist philosophical responses to the
feminization of migration fall into two general lines of argument. Early work in this area highlights the ways
in which gender, race, class, culture, and immigration status intersect to produce disproportionate burdens
for immigrant women. Later work discusses the feminization of labor migration, with a focus on domestic
workers.

Some feminists argue that a feminist ethics of care is better suited to theorizing global care chains. In
particular, care ethics emphasizes several key normative features and practices that traditional theories tend
to overlook: concrete specificity; acknowledgement of human dependence and vulnerability; and a relational
understanding of the self. Care ethics focuses on the ethical significance of relationships formed through
dependency, such as those between caregivers and their charges. Kitty argues that intimate relationships
between specific individuals, in which caring and affection are the norm, play a vital role in forming and
sustaining individuals' self-identities. When these relationships are disrupted, people suffer harm to their
sense of self and self-respect. It follows that the harm involved in global care chains lies in their threat to the
core relationships that are constitutive of self-identity.

Human Rights

The term ‘human rights’ refers simultaneously to several things: a moral language; a set of norms and laws,
both national and international; and a framework for analysing and responding to the various serious harms
experienced by men and women around the world. Feminist political philosophers argue that globalization
has had contradictory effects on the extent to which women experience human rights violations.xx

Many feminist political philosophers have argued that globalization has contributed to human rights
violations against women. Most obviously, neoliberal policies have led to infringements of specific social
and economic rights, such as the right “to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being” and
the right “to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, and old age” (Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, article 25). Moreover, by diminishing women's economic security, neoliberal
policies have exacerbated existing forms of gender discrimination and violence and made women and girls
more vulnerable to a wide variety of additional human rights violations.xxi

Debashis Baidya Page | 6

Democracy and Global Governancexxii

As with human rights, feminist philosophers have argued that globalization has contradictory implications
for democratic governance. Globalization also connects people across national borders, creating transnational
communities that offer new avenues for democratic participation.

Globalization has been accompanied by the establishment of formal democracy in some countries and the
number of women serving in national legislatures has increased in some nations. However, some feminist
philosophers are quick to argue that neoliberals has not resulted in increased political influence for women
on the whole, especially at the level of global politics. One important reason is that global economic
institutions are neither adequately representative nor fully democratic. Women are virtually absent from the
formal decision-making bodies of institutions such as the WTO and the World Bank, and these institutions
tend to be unofficially dominated by the interests of wealthy nations and multinational corporations.

Feminists argue that women's lack of political influence at the global level has not been compensated for by
their increased influence in national politics because globalization has undermined national sovereignty,
especially in poor nations.

Conclusion

On the whole, globalization presents a number of challenges to feminist political philosophers who seek to
develop conceptions of justice and responsibility capable of responding to the lived realities of both men and
women. As globalization will most certainly continue, these challenges are likely to increase in the coming
decades. As we have outlined above, feminist political philosophers have already made great strides towards
understanding this complex phenomenon. Yet the challenge of how to make globalization fairer remains for
feminist philosophers, as well as all others who strive for equality and justice.

History of Feminist/Womanist Movements in India

1. Introduction
The coming of the British in India brought about tremendous changes in the socio-economic and political
life of the Indian society. The women’s' development in India started as a social change development in the
nineteenth centuryxxiii. As compared to the women’s movement in European societies, women’s movement
against the patriarchal institutions of gender injustice has been weak. Living in the 21st century, humanity
can claim to have progressed and boast of all its achievements. But what is progress? Until our global society

Debashis Baidya Page | 7

provides to be just, humane and equitable, maintaining total harmony within and with the non-human world,
we cannot claim progress or achievement. This paper briefly presents the history of the development of
Feminist movement in India and also discusses issues related to the movement.

2. Definition
As the topic is related to India I would be defining Feminism in the Third World. The feminists in the
developed countries are drawn towards lengthy discourses on the epistemology of feminism, women in the
developing nations have no time for theoretical discussions.xxiv This is because feminists in the Third World
are mobilisers and organizers of women-specific issues of vital importance.

Feminism for the Third World Women is awareness of women’s oppression and exploitation in society at
work and within the family, conscious action by women and men to change this situation. In this context any
one, male or female who recognizes sexism, male domination and patriarchy and takes action against it, is a
feminist.xxv In the context of India, Dalit-Feminism, Eco-Feminism and Tribal Feminism are emerging and
contributing to the empowerment of women.

3. The Need for Feminist Movements in India

Before the patriarchal society was well organized and shifted to a rigid and a hierarchical structure, women
had enjoyed active participation in various social activities and had almost equal rights as men.xxvi However,
in the course of time women’s role and status were diminished gradually due to the dominant ideology of
patriarchy. According to SelvyThiruchancran, “patriarchy is male supremacy in the social arrangement or
organization which implies various kinds of dominance and control by men on women”xxvii. Which is
operationalized through many devices such as patrilineal descent, patrilocality and control on women’s
sexuality, ownership and inheritance of property, denial of educational, political and religious
participationxxviii.

4. History of Feminist movements in India

Though there were feelings of deprivation and anger against the injustices women were facing, these
remained mostly latent, and at the most, sometimes mildly open. In today’s world, feminist movements have
gained expression due to similar factors.The women's development in India can be viewed as shaping through
three phases.xxix The main phase can be seen amid the national development, when there was mass
preparation of women for support in the nationalist development. From that point, for over 10 years, there
was a respite in political exercises by ladies. The late 1960s saw resurgence in woman’s political action and

Debashis Baidya Page | 8

can be known as the second wave. In the late 1970s, the third influx of the ladies' development risen, which
concentrated on ladies' strengtheningxxx.

a. The first phase:1850–1915

The provincial wander into advancement brought ideas of majority rules system, uniformity and individual
rights. The ascent of the idea of patriotism and thoughtfulness of prejudicial practices achieved social change
developments identified with position and sex relations. This first period of women's liberation in India was
started by men to remove the social shades of malice of sati, to permit widow remarriage, to disallow child
marriage, and to decrease ignorance, and in addition to direct the time of agree and to guarantee property
rights through legitimate intercessionxxxi. Women in this stage were ordered alongside lower ranks as subjects
of social changes and welfare as opposed to being perceived as self-ruling operators of progressxxxii.

The social reform movement was a movement run by men on women’s issues. Though rarely women could
emerge as leaders like PanditaRamabai, it was men like Raja Ram Mohan Roy, VidyasagarRanade,
Veerasalingam who were fighters of social changexxxiii. The beginning of the movement can be dated from
Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s campaign against Sati in 1818. BrahmoSamaj was founded in 1828. As a result of
his campaign, the government passed the law prohibiting Sati in 1829xxxiv. It was the beginning of the whole
ear of effort to change women’s subordination by both legal and social methods. Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar
initiated a movement for Widow Remarriage Act of 1850s. A Parsi reformer named BehramjiMalabari stirred
up a debate through his newspaper articles. As result of this the National Social Conference was formed in
1887 and the Age of Consent Bill was passed in 1991.xxxv

Many women belonging to the various castes joined the Bhakti Movement. The saints stood up for equal
rights of men and women. It resulted in some amount of social freedom for women. Women joined in Kathas
and Kirtans organized by various saints of the Bhakti Movementxxxvi. This helped in freeing women from the
labor and restrictions of domestic life. The Bhakti Movement was an egalitarian movement that cut across
gender and caste discriminations. Some women such as Mira Bai, Akkamahadevi, and Janaki became leading
poetesses. The saints of the Bhakti Movement produced considerable literature in the vernacular language,
or the language of the people.

Even though the reform and revivalist leaders were mostly men, it was also part of a process in which women
were struggling against patriarchal structures to gain some opening. With new spaces created, they tried to
move directly into the movement into leading positions, they tended to go beyond, to transcend and transgress
the barriers of Hindu revivalismxxxvii.

Debashis Baidya Page | 9

b. Second Stage: 1915-1947
Every national liberation movement involves the issues of women’s liberation to some degree or another.
The Indian National Movement was no exception. Women were growing part of all struggle from
participation in Bengal’s freedom struggle to Gandhainsatyagrahas, to the revolutionary upsurge of
1942xxxviii. The Indian National Congress even supported for voting rights of women. Gandhi legitimized and
expanded Indian women’s public activities by initiating them into the non-violent civil disobedience
movement against the British Raj. He exalted their feminine roles of caring, self-abnegation, sacrifice and
tolerance; and carved a niche for those in public space. Women-only organizations like All India Women's
Conference (AIWC) and the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW) emerged xxxix. Women were
grappling with the issues relating to the scope of women’s political participation, women’s franchise,
communal awards, and leadership roles in political parties.

The Indian National Movement was more than a movement of one class. It swept much of the society and
stirred up forces that moved against many traditional values. Gandhian nationalism and reconstruction of
Hinduism brought with it at least some modification of traditional forms of patriarchy. But the bourgeoisie
domination of the movement remainedxl.

c. Third Phase: 1947 onwards

There is a distinction between pre-independence and post-Independence women’s move­ments in India. The
pre-independence movements were essentially about social reforms and initiated by men. In comparison, the
post-independence movement demanded gender equality, questioned gender-based division of labor and
highlighted the oppressive nature of the existing patriarchal structure. With independence, when the
constitutional equality was guaranteed and the social Welfare board evolved grants in aid programmes for
women’s organizations, a period of acquiescence began. The concept of welfare for women changed to
development of women during the sixth five year plan(1980-1985)xli. The approach of the eighth five year
plan (1992-1997) marked a shift from development to empowerment of women. It also recommended 30%
reservation at all levels of government.

Woman activists found it necessary to take up issues related to oppression. Some autonomous groups were
the Progressive Organisations of Women (POW) Hyderabad; the Forum against Rape (Mumbai),
StreeSanghrash and MahilaDakshataSamaj against dowryxlii. The forum against Rape later changed to Forum
against Oppression of Women (FAOW) which had its beginning in 1980. Self Employed Women’s
Association (SEWA) is an organization to collectivise women in a joint action of labour and co-operatives
by providing supportive services of credit, management and marketing. Dasholi Gram SwarajaMandal was

Debashis Baidya Page | 10

organized under Chipko movement. Women were entrusted to protect forests and save trees from merciless
cutting. The National Commission for Women (NCW) was setup in 1992xliii.

5. Conclusion
When we look at the history of civil rights movements and the interlinkages between patriarchy and other
dominat ideologies we cannot but help notice the need for the rise of feminist/womanist theologies. In the
context of India we notice that civil rights movements have a very important place in the present. Women in
India still suffer under the yoke of patriarchy and violence they suffer is still as extreme as ever. We do not
know how much time it will take for changes to take root therefore not only the present but the future too
needs reflection in the field of civil rights movements and as well as theology.

One of the means through which we can empower women for a fuller participation in our society is through
recovery of women’s lost stories in our traditions. Through patriarchy, women’s roles are badly distorted,
misinterpreted and almost wiped out from the main stream of our history. Thus, what Yung S.Kim says is
true, “To practice sharing in our society and to understand women’s stories correctly, we believe that there
needs to be a healing of the patriarchal prejudice against women”.

Different Waves of Feminism

Introduction:

As we explore the history of feminism: how have they evolved in time and space, how have they framed
feminist communication scholarship in terms of what we see as a significant interplay between theory and
politics, and how have they raised questions of gender, power, and communication; we see several phases
into which it has developed and gone through. This is popularly known as waves of feminism and there are
at least three of them in the modern feminism beginning from 19th till 21st century. We can find three
different waves of feminism which were of progressive development in women’s movement from which
feminist theology and feminist pedagogy.

Firstly, woman's rights emerged with regards to industrial society and liberal politics yet is associated with
both the liberal women’s rights development and early communist women's liberation in the late nineteenth
and mid twentieth century in the United States and Europe. The main wave kept on affecting women's
liberation in both Western and Eastern social orders all through the twentieth century. We then proceed
onward to the second rush of women's liberation, which rose in the 1960s to 1970s in after war Western

Debashis Baidya Page | 11

welfare social orders, when other "mistreated" gatherings, for example, Blacks and gay people were being
characterized and the New Left was on the ascent.

Second-wave women's liberation is firmly connected to the radical voices of ladies' strengthening and
differential rights and, amid the 1980s to 1990s, likewise to an essential separation of second-wave woman's
rights itself, started by ladies of shading and third-world ladies. We end our discourse with the third women's
activist wave, from the mid-1990s forward, springing from the emergence of another postcolonial and post-
socialist world request, with regards to data society and neoliberal, worldwide governmental issues.

Third-wave woman's rights looks to conquer the hypothetical question of value or contrast and the political
question of development or upset, while it challenges the thought of "general womanhood" and grasps
uncertainty, differing qualities, and assortment in transversal hypothesis and legislative issues.

1. First Wave of Feminism: “Votes for Women”

Amid World War I, individuals from the National Women's Party (NWP) protested outside the White House
with fierce flags blaming the legislature for undemocratic practices. Germany had effectively allowed ladies
suffrage, however the United States, the advocate of flexibility and majority rule government for all,
presently couldn't seem to emancipate half of its natives. The flag made a shock, the police got requests to
capture the picketers, and spectators devastated the standard. Contrasting Germany with the United States
was foul play. Be that as it may, the picketers received some sensitivity, all things considered, sharp looking,
knowledgeable, White, working class ladies would imprison. This was no real way to treat women! It was
concerned with the emerging language of political rights to the particular domestic and social situation of
women, in which she demanded women’s rights be included in the rights of men, equal treatment in
education, work, politics and moral standard.

The first wave of feminism in the United States was portrayed by assorted types of intercession that have
kept on rousing later women's activist developments. In any case, regardless of the dissident abilities of Alice
Paul, the authoritative aptitudes of Carrie Chapman Catt, leader of NAWSA, and the awe-inspiring rhetoric
of Anna Howard Shaw, additionally a previous leader of NAWSA, it was a long battle before ladies won the
vote in 1920. The battle went as far back as the Seneca Falls Convention in New York in 1848, amid which
more than 300 men and ladies collected for the country's first ladies' rights tradition. The Seneca Falls
Declaration was illustrated by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, asserting the common value of ladies and sketching
out the political technique of equivalent get to and opportunity. This assertion offered ascend to the suffrage
development.

Debashis Baidya Page | 12

In the early stages, the first wave of feminism in the United States was interlaced with other change
developments, for example, abrogation and balance, and at first firmly included ladies of the regular workers.
Be that as it may, it was additionally bolstered by Black ladies abolitionists, for example, Maria Stewart,
Sojourner Truth, and Frances E. W. Harper, who disturbed for the privileges of ladies of shading. Elizabeth
Cady Stanton and a few others from the more radical parts of the ladies' rights development showed up as
agents to the National Labour Union Convention as ahead of schedule as 1868, preceding any effective
endeavours to sort out female labour. At the point when women rights activists step by step understood that
disappointment seriously hampered reformatory endeavours, they got to be distinctly resolved to
compensation this visible obscene play. Still, for ladies to pick up the vote was a very disputable issue.
Indeed, even good natured doubters expected that it would mean a misfortune for men of covering, who were
likewise around then battling for liberation, also southerners' feelings of dread that a huge number of
unskilled ladies of covering would likewise guarantee their rights. Subsequently, in spite of the fact that
ladies of covering kept on taking an interest and agents, for example, Ida B. Wells and Mary Church Terrell
likewise endeavoured to show how the linkage of sexism and prejudice worked as the primary method for
White male strength, the main rush of women's liberation comprised to a great extent of White, white collar
class, accomplished ladies. This feeling was just strengthened by the counterstrike of both the opponent
development and the working unions to likewise keep ladies required in these developments. Moreover, the
Civil War in the United States and, later on, both World War I and World War II implied an extreme reaction
for ladies' rights, as the concentration then got to be requests of national solidarity and patriotism.

Some first-wave women's activists sought after the argument of women’s natural good occurrence, along
these lines grasping what may be called "defence first-wave feminism."This contention was a piece of an
advanced talk of value, grew at the same time in Europe and in the United States, which shared the cutting
edge, Western political structure of edification and radicalism, tied down in universalism. Patriarchy was
understood as a disaster that was both non-rational and no profitable and in this way ill-conceived, yet in any
case strengthened women’s minor societal status and control and made ladies a social token of inadequacy.
Politically, this view prompted to the claim that women and men ought to be dealt with as equivalents and
that ladies ought not exclusively be offered access to an indistinguishable assets and positions from men
additionally be acknowledged for their commitments and capabilities. This idea is frequently called "equal-
opportunities feminism" or “equity feminism," and it is described by the absence of refinement amongst sex
and gender. Despite the fact that natural contrasts were comprehended to shape the premise of social sexual
orientation parts, they were not viewed as a risk to the perfect of human value, and organic contrasts were in
this manner not acknowledged as hypothetically or politically substantial explanations behind separation.

Debashis Baidya Page | 13

Both liberal and communist/Marxist feminism kept on creating and keep up solid voices in twentieth century
woman's rights, however they were soon tested by different sorts of women's liberation. The idea of
equivalent open door confined a specific sort of value research, which emerged outside the foundation in the
main portion of the twentieth century, and step by step gave the premise to a developing field of research in
women’s issues.

2. Second Wave of Feminism: “The Personal Is Political”

The term second-wave feminism refers mostly to the radical feminism of the women’s liberation movement
of the late 1960s and early 1970s. The first forerunner of a new feminism and the most publicized event in
the United States of second-wave feminism is the protests associated with the Miss America Pageants in
1968 and 1969. Inspired by the strategies of the more activist parts of liberal feminism, radical second-wave
feminists also used performance to shed light on what was now termed “women’s oppression.”

Radical second-wave feminism can't be talked about independently from different developments of the
1970s. According to Fiorenza, “feminism is the radical notion that women are people”. Out of liberal
developments after war, several things came up in Western social orders. Among them the substitute dissents,
the anti–Vietnam War development, the lesbian and gay developments, and, in the United States, the social
liberties and Black power developments are prominent. These developments rebuked "free enterprise" and
"colonialism" and concentrated on the thought and interests of so called “mistreated" gatherings like the
common laborers, Blacks and also on a basic level ladies and gay people. Women were diminished to
adjusting the unrest. This was presently understood as a different abuse experienced by ladies which was
later renamed "heterosexism." As a result, they framed ladies just "rap" gatherings or cognizance raising
gatherings, through which they looked to engage ladies both on the whole and separately utilizing systems
of sharing and challenging, clarified in the main second-wave production, “Sisterhood is Powerful” altered
by Robin Morgan in 1970. The Redstockings was one of the convincing however fleeting radical women's
activist gatherings of the 1960 to 1970s and created huge numbers of the expressions that have gotten to be
family unit words in the United States: “Sisterhood is powerful,” “consciousness raising,” “The personal is
political,” “the politics of housework,” the “prowoman line,” etc. Key to this branch of women's liberation
was a solid conviction that ladies could all things considered engage one other.

In the United States, Black women's activists voiced their worries in associations, for example, Black Women
Organized for Action (BWOA) and the National Black Feminist Organization (NBFO), which both attempted
to bring sex and race into the national cognizance and tended to issues of destitution, wellbeing, and welfare
as portrayed by Valerie Smith in Not Just Race, Not Just Gender: Black Feminist Readings (1998). Black

Debashis Baidya Page | 14

women's liberation likewise had a tendency to expand into various stances and personalities. Ladies of
shading and third-world ladies, as Trinh T. Minh-ha, now talked about themselves as "Others Others" and
"inappropriated others." Gayatri Spivak's In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (1987) additionally
reprimanded Western women's liberation for talking gullibly for the benefit of third-world ladies. She
expounded on the thought of "vital essentialism" and brought up the issue of the trouble related with
interpretation between various gatherings of ladies, their vocabulary, and voice.

In the European setting, personality women's liberation took a clearly extraordinary course with what is
currently known as l'écriture féminine, enunciated by creators Hélène Cixous, Luce Irigaray, and Julia
Kristeva and acquainted with the United States by editors Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtivron in New
French Feminisms (1981). French women's activists investigated Western universalism and its
incomprehensible enunciation through dualisms, for example, mind/body, man/lady, and White/Black and
their various leveled requesting, in which one component is not quite the same as well as not exactly the
other. Building up a theory of the "phallogocentrism" of Western considering, they contended that it
constitutes the very establishment of (Western) language(s) through a twofold rationale that makes the
phallus the ace sign and the father the inception of typical law. Thus, French women's activists pled for a
deconstructive female composition and sought after the possibility of the progressive capability of ladies'
bodies as the profitable site of different goals, an abundance of jouissance, and in this manner another
semiotic rationale. In her thesis Spéculum de l'autre femme, Irigaray took the feedback of phallogocentrism
above and beyond and kept up that Western thinking in reality sets "man" as the "unparalleled" (both
personality and body/matter) and "lady" not as the inverse and contrary (body/matter), yet rather completely
outside of human advancement/dialect. Her point was in this way that the venture for ladies/women's activists
is not and can't be to relate to distinction, (for example, body/matter), and she cautioned against the
inclination to highlight another yearning/rationale.

Second-wave women's liberation is not one, but rather numerous. As communicated by women's activist
correspondence researcher Julia Wood (1994), the question may not be whether you are a women's activist,
but rather which sort of women's activist you are. This question is increased by the rise of third-wave women's
liberation. In any case, before we swing to emanant feminisms, let us reason that second-wave feminisms
have been profoundly hypothetical and therefore have had solid affiliations with the institute. Beginning in
the 1970s, second-wave feminisms have created a blast of research and educating on ladies' issues, which
has now developed into a different disciplinary field of women's, sexual orientation, or women's activist
reviews. While first-and second-wave scholastic feminisms are implanted in structuralism, the idea of
contrast and personality women's liberation is established in stance hypothesis, and the system of basic talk

Debashis Baidya Page | 15

investigation. Contrast and character women's liberation has affected correspondence grant through the ideas
of social women's liberation and gendered correspondence styles or "genderlects,".

3. Third Wave of Feminism: “Transversal Politics”

Born with the privileges that first- and second-wave feminists fought for, thirdwave feminists generally see
themselves as capable, strong, and assertive social agents: “The Third Wave is buoyed by the confidence of
having more opportunities and less sexism”. Young feminists now reclaim the term “girl” in a bid to attract
another generation, while engaging in a new, more self-assertive—even aggressive—but also more playful
and less pompous kind of feminism. They declare, in the words of Karen McNaughton (1997), “And yes
that’s G.r.r.l.s which is, in our case, cyber-lingo for Great-Girls. Grrl is also a young at heart thing and not
limited to the under 18s.”

Third-wave feminists are persuaded by the need to build up a feminist hypothesis and governmental issues
that respect conflicting encounters and deconstruct clear cut considering. In “Telling the Truth and Changing
the Face of Feminism” (1995), Rebecca Walker depicted the trouble that more youthful women's activists
encounter when compelled to think in classes, which isolate individuals into "Us" and "Them," or when
compelled to occupy specific ways of life as ladies or feminists. Walker guaranteed this is not on the grounds
that they need learning of feminist history or as a result of the media's awful uneven depiction of woman's
rights. More youthful women's activists respect the work of prior women's activists while scrutinizing prior
feminisms, and they endeavour to extension disagreements that they involvement in their own particular
lives. They grasp equivocalness as opposed to sureness, participate in numerous positions, and practice a
procedure of consideration and investigation. Then, they propose an alternate governmental issue, one that
difficulties ideas of all-inclusive womanhood and expresses courses in which gatherings of ladies defy
complex crossing points of gender, sexuality, race, class, and age related concerns.

Third-wave feminism is likewise roused by and bound to an era of the new worldwide world request
described by the fall of socialism, new dangers of religious and ethnic fundamentalism, and the double
dangers and guarantees of new data and biotechnologies. A typical American expression for third-wave
woman's rights is "grrl feminism," and in Europe it is known as "new feminism." This "new" feminism is
described by nearby, national, and transnational activism, in regions, for example, brutality against ladies,
trafficking, body surgery, self-mutilation, and the in general "pornofication" of the media. While worried
with new dangers to ladies' rights in the wake of the new worldwide world request, it censures prior women's
activist waves for exhibiting all-inclusive answers or meanings of womanhood and for forming their specific
advantages into fairly static personality governmental issues.

Debashis Baidya Page | 16

Third-wave feminism is tied up with the impacts of globalization and the mind-boggling redistribution of
force, which challenge women's activist hypothesis and legislative issues. It additionally reflects the
expansion of women’s interests and points of view and the breakdown of ace stories of persecution and
freedom. For instance, postcolonial, third-wave woman's rights is worried with building up another basic
worldwide viewpoint and making partnerships between Black, diasporic, and subaltern feminisms, while
unusual hypothesis and legislative issues make a stage for what has now part into the lesbian, gay, bisexual,
and transsexual and transgender developments. Strange and transgender women's activists assault what they
see as the essence of the issue: heteronormativity. They call for acknowledgment of queers: gays and lesbians
as well as drag rulers, drag rulers, transsexuals, manly ladies, and female men. Emi Koyama (2003)
compressed some of these worries in "The Transfeminist Manifesto." Here, the essential standards of
transfeminism are characterized as the privilege:

1. To characterize one's own personality and to anticipate that society will regard it.

2. To settle on choices in regards to one's own particular body.

Transfeminisms trust that people ought to be given the opportunity to develop their own sexual orientation
ways of life as they see fit and that neither the medicinal foundation nor social establishments everywhere
ought to intercede. At last, they oppose essentialist thoughts of character specifically.

In general, third-wave woman's rights constitute a critical move in both hypothesis and governmental issues
toward the "performance turn". The execution dismisses marks a move from speculation and acting as far as
frameworks, structures, settled power relations, and in this manner likewise suppression toward highlighting
the complexities, possibilities, and difficulties of force and the assorted means and objectives of organization.
Installed in the logical outlook change from structuralism to poststructuralist, the execution turn is associated
with a more extensive scholarly change.

i Neeru Tandon, Feminism A P aradigm Shift,( Atlantic: New Delh i, 2008) 1 07.
ii Neeru Tandon, Feminism A P aradigm Shift,( Atlantic: New Delh i, 2008) 1 07
iii Neeru Tandon, Feminism A P aradigm Shift,( Atlantic: New Delh i, 2008) 1 07
iv Neeru Tandon, Feminism A P aradigm Shift,( Atlantic: New Delh i, 2008) 1 07
v Neeru Tandon, Feminism A P aradigm Shift,( Atlantic: New Delh i, 2008) 1 07
vi V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000)109
vii V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 109
viii V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 110
ix V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 110
x V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 115
xi V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 115
xii V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 116
xiii V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 115
xiv Binion, G., “Human Rights : A Feminist Perspective,” in Women's Rights: A H uman Rights Q uarter ly Reader, B. L ockw ood (ed.) Baltimore: The Johns H op kin s University Press, 2006, pp. 70 –86.
xv V.R. Krish na Iy er and Feliciano V. Carino eds., G loba liza tion a nd its imp act on Huma n rig hts, ( Christian Sah ity a Samithy :Kerala, 2000) 120
xvi Ackerly , B., and Attanasi, K., “Glo bal Feminisms: Theory and Ethics for Study ing Gendered Injustice,” New Political Science, 31(4): 543–5 55. 200 9
xvii Ackerly , B., and Attanasi, K., “Glo bal Feminisms: Theory and Ethics for Study ing Gendered Injustice,” New Political Science, 31(4): 543–5 55. 200 9

xviii Bahar, S., “Human Rig hts are Women's Rights : Amnesty International and the Family ,” Hypatia: A Journal of Femin ist Ph ilo sophy, 11(1): 105–13 4. 1996
xix Binion, G., “Human Rights : A Feminist Perspective,” in Women's Rights: A H uman Rights Q uarter ly Reader, B. L ockw ood (ed.) Baltimore: The Johns H op kin s University Press, pp. 70–86. 2 006.
xx Bunch, C., 2004 , “A Fem inis t Human Rig hts Lens on Human Security ,” Peace Review: A Journal of Social J ustice, 16(1): 29–34.

xxi Bunch, C., 2004 , “A Feminis t Human Rig hts Lens on Human Security ,” Peace Review: A Journal of Social J ustice, 16(1): 35.
xxii Ackerly , B., and Attanasi, K., “Glo bal Feminisms: Theory and Ethics for Study ing Gendered Injustice,” New Political Science, 31(4): 543–5 55. 200 9

xxiiiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies, (Delhi:ISPCK, 2011), 102 .
xxivNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A rea der in Women’s stu dies... 22 .
xxvNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...22.
xxviN.Limala, “Rediscovering women’s ro le and Status in Society ” in Doing theo logy with Tribal Resource ed. WatiLongchar and Larr y E. Davis (Assam: Tribal Study Centre, 1999), 77 .
xxviiN.Limala, “Rediscovering women’s ro le and Status in Society ” in Doing theo logy with Tribal Resource...77.
xxviiiN.Limala, “Rediscovering women’s ro le and Status in Society ” in Doing theo logy with Tribal Resource...77.
xxixLalneihzov i, “Women’s Development in India”, (New Delhi: Mitthal Publication, 200 7) 20-21.
xxxRameshwari Devi, “Women’s Role in Indian National Mo vement”, (Jaipur: Pointer Publis hers, 2003) 21.
xxxiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 1.
xxxiiRameshwari Devi, “Women’s Role in Indian National Mo vement”, (Jaipur: Pointer Publis hers, 2003).
xxxiiiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 1.
xxxivNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 2-103.
xxxvNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 2-103.
xxxviwww.y ourarticlelibrary .com/essay /womens-movemnts-in-India assessed on 31/1/201 7.
xxxviiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 3.
xxxviiiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 3.
xxxixNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 4.
xlNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 5.
xliNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 6.
xliiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 8.
xliiiNirmalaJey araj, ‘Women and Society ’: A reader in Women’s stu dies...10 8.

Debashis Baidya Page | 17