0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views1 page

CAES9121 Press Conference Grading Criteria 2024-25

The document outlines grading criteria for press conferences, emphasizing the importance of answering the questions asked. It provides a detailed rubric with categories such as relevance, fluency, lexical and grammatical accuracy, interaction, delivery, and quality of questions, ranging from 'Excellent' to 'Does not produce any relevant speech.' Each grade level includes specific descriptors to evaluate performance effectively.

Uploaded by

Log Gor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views1 page

CAES9121 Press Conference Grading Criteria 2024-25

The document outlines grading criteria for press conferences, emphasizing the importance of answering the questions asked. It provides a detailed rubric with categories such as relevance, fluency, lexical and grammatical accuracy, interaction, delivery, and quality of questions, ranging from 'Excellent' to 'Does not produce any relevant speech.' Each grade level includes specific descriptors to evaluate performance effectively.

Uploaded by

Log Gor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CAES9121 – Press Conferences – Grading Criteria

The most important criterion is “answering the question being asked”. This is highlighted in yellow.
Relevance + Fluency Lexical + Grammatical Interaction + Delivery Quality of Questions
Excellent in all • All responses are relevant to the • resources
Uses a wide range of vocabulary • Handles situation with • Very clear & concise.
aspects questions asked & grammatical structures confidence, totally engaged in • Completely relevant.
• Speaks fluently & naturally accurately: minor slips do not role.
• Takes forward the discussion
A+
without reading from notes impede communication. • Use of intonation (stress, pitch &/or introduces a new sub-topic.
A • Develops topic / ideas fully & • Can self-correct effectively. variation & pause) enhances
• Delivery & eye-contact are used
A- appropriately but manages to communication & is effortless to
very effectively.
maintain conciseness in understand.
• Language/vocab of questioning is
answers • Very effective delivery
accurate & appropriate.
• Organises responses well (e.g. throughout: body language,
using cohesive devices). interaction and negotiation of
Reformulates exp ressions meaning of questions if
effectively if required. necessary.
Good to • Most responses are relevant to • Uses a range of vocabulary & • Acceptable but variable level of • Mostly clear but may not be very
Very Good the questions asked; one or two structures with some flexibility. confidence & engagement in concise.
responses are irrelevant Some noticeable errors that do role. • Mostly relevant.
B+
• Speaks fairly fluently & not cause comprehension • Can generally be understood • Adds a new point.
naturally without reading problems. though some mispronunciation &
B • Delivery & eye-contact
B-
from notes but with some • Sometimes self-corrects effectively. lack of intonation features may
acceptable.
lapses. occur.
• • Language/vocab are mostly
Develops answers mostly • Mostly effective delivery accurate & appropriate.
appropriately and manages to throughout: body language,
demonstrate conciseness in interaction and negotiation of
most answers meaning of questions if
• Demonstrates awareness necessary.
of some cohesive
C+ Satisfactory • strategies
Main in responses.
message understandable, • Uses a mix of simple & complex • Limited range of engagement in • Limited clarity.
C but there may be some vocabulary & structures but with scenario. • Relevance not apparent or
C- problems with conciseness. A limited accuracy & flexibility that • Attempts some features of repeats a previous question.
number of responses are occasionally cause intonation but overall monotone • Delivery not consistent.
irrelevant to the questions comprehension problems. delivery reduces clarity.
asked. • Only occasionally self-corrects. • Reading aloud written Q using
• Delivery & body language not inappropriate register.
• There may be some reading consistent + may have some
from notes. inappropriate habits for this
• Uses repetition &/or slow speech specific scenario.
to keep going.
• May over-use certain
basic connectives.
Bare Pass • Most responses are not • Uses basic vocabulary & • Weak or non-engagement in • Unclear either due to weak
understandable, relevant or structures with frequent errors that scenario. language or lack of focus.
D+
conciseness may cause misunderstanding. • Slow speed, monotone &/or • Not directly relevant.
D • Speaks with long pauses, • Tends not to self-correct. staccato delivery causes some • May confuse issues.
sometimes disjointed answers . difficulty for the listener.
• Asked to re-phrase question
cannot express the main • Delivery & body language (once? More than once?).
message fully. ineffective.
• There may be some reading
from notes.
• Limited ability to provide cohesion
F Does not produce any relevant
in speech, or clearly
some comprehensible
breakdowns in speech
coherence.

You might also like