Dokumen - Pub Vertical Gan and Sic Power Devices 1nbsped 9781630814298 9781630814274
Dokumen - Pub Vertical Gan and Sic Power Devices 1nbsped 9781630814298 9781630814274
Vertical GaN
This unique resource provides a thorough introduction to vertical gallium nitride
Devices
solid-state devices.
Details about the effects of photon recycling are explained, presenting readers with
a greater understanding of state-of-the-art GaN bipolar devices. This book offers
in-depth coverage of bulk crystal growth of GaN, including hydride vapor-phase
epitaxial (HVPE) growth, high-pressure nitrogen solution growth, sodium-flux growth,
ammonothermal growth, and sublimation growth of SiC. The fabrication process,
including epitaxial growth, ion implantation, diffusion, oxidation, metallization, and
passivation, is explained. The book provides details about metal-semiconductor
contacts, unipolar power diodes, and metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) power Kazuhiro Mochizuki
switching devices. Bipolar power diodes, power switching devices, and edge
terminations are also covered in this resource.
Mochizuki
Kazuhiro Mochizuki is affiliated with the National Institute of Advanced Industrial
Science and Technology, Japan. Previously he was involved in the research of GaN
and SiC power devices at the Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
He is a senior member of the IEEE and a member of the Japan Society of Applied
Physics. He is also a lecturer at the University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo,
Japan, and Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.
in electronic engineering from the University of Tokyo, Japan.
ARTECH HOUSE
BOSTON I LONDON
www.artechhouse.com
All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book
may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, includ-
ing photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without per-
mission in writing from the publisher.
All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have
been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information.
Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or
service mark.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Preface xi
References xii
3 p-n Junctions 41
3.1 Introduction 41
3.2 Diffusion 42
3.3 Continuity Equations 43
3.4 Carrier Recombination Lifetime 44
3.4.1 Band-to-Band Recombination Lifetime 44
3.4.2 SRH Recombination Lifetime 46
3.4.3 Auger Recombination Lifetime 47
3.4.4 Overall Expression for Carrier Recombination Lifetime 48
3.5 Depletion-Region Width of One-Dimensional
p+n Abrupt Junction 50
3.6 One-Dimensional Forward-Current/Voltage Characteristics 52
3.6.1 Low-Level Injection Condition 52
3.6.2 High-Level Injection Condition 55
3.6.3 An Example of Measured Current/Voltage Characteristics 55
3.7 Multidimensional Forward-Current/Voltage Characteristics 57
3.7.1 Influence of Surface Recombination on Peripheral Current of p+n
Diodes 57
3.7.2 Influence of Electric-Field Concentration on Non-Self-Aligned
Mea-type p+n Diodes 59
3.8 Junction Breakdown 61
3.9 Summary 63
References 63
6 Epitaxial Growth 97
6.1 Introduction 97
6.2 MOCVD of GaN 97
6.3 Two-Dimensional Nucleation Theory 100
6.4 BCF theory 101
6.5 CVD of 4H-SiC 103
6.6 CVD Trench Filling of 4H-SiC 109
6.7 Summary 111
References 112
Index 253
Compared with silicon, both gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide
(SiC) have excellent physical properties; the electric field that results in
breakdown is more than 10 times higher, and the thermal conductivity is
33%−330% higher. They are therefore expected to be the ultimate materi-
als for power devices used in highly efficient power-electronics systems.
In the case of GaN, recent progress concerning high-quality freestanding
substrates has dramatically improved the performance of vertical power
devices. However, in the latest book on GaN and SiC power devices, this
improved performance is only mentioned briefly in a 10-page-long chapter
[1]. In view of that situation, this book is intended to provide a comparative
introduction to vertical GaN and SiC power devices for students, research-
ers, and engineers working in the field of crystal growth, processing, and
design for power semiconductor devices.
I started writing this book after receiving an offer from Artech House
following a talk I was invited to give entitled “Vertical GaN Bipolar Devices:
Gaining Competitive Advantage from Photon Recycling” at the Internation-
al Symposium on Compound Semiconductors in 2016 [2]. The emphasis
in this book is therefore partly on photon recycling (Chapter 4), which is
important for increasing not only the effective minority-carrier lifetime but
also the ionization ratio of deep acceptors. Photon recycling in GaN is at-
tributable to very large peripheral current flowing through non-self-aligned
mesa-type p-n junctions (Chapter 3). This phenomenon has not been
described in any books, since forward current flowing through p-n junc-
tions has been treated one-dimensionally only.
xi
In addition, to the best of my knowledge, all the books on GaN and SiC
power devices inadequately describe Schottky junctions; namely, they de-
scribe thermionic emission as a limiting process on current transport even
though electron mobility becomes quite low under a high electric field. As
described in Chapter 8, diffusion is more important, especially when elec-
tron mobility is reduced by ion-implantation-induced damage or phonon
scattering at elevated temperatures.
Among unipolar power-switching devices, SiC superjunction power-
switching devices are expected to have the lowest specific on-resistance
around a breakdown voltage of 6.5 kV. Although trench-filling epitaxy is
indispensable for fabricating Si and SiC superjunction devices, the trench-
filling mechanisms in the cases of silicon and SiC are completely different.
Chapter 6 is thus dedicated to explaining such epitaxial growth mechanisms.
Other topics that have not been covered in previous books on power
semiconductor devices include the following: a comparison of vertical and
lateral power-semiconductor devices based on reported results (Chapter 1),
modeling of aluminum and boron profiles in SiC (Chapter 7), GaN bipolar
junction transistors (Chapter 10), and a comparison of junction termina-
tions and reliability of vertical GaN and SiC power devices (Chapters 11
and 12).
I wrote this book with the help of valuable supporting discus-
sions with professor Tomoyoshi Mishima of Hosei University on ex-
trinsic photon recycling (Chapter 4); Professor Emeritus Tatau Nishi-
naga of the University of Tokyo on supersaturation of spiral growth
and the Gibbs–Thomson effect (Chapter 6); professor Toshikazu Su-
zuki of the Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology on
Schottky junctions (Chapter 8); and anonymous reviewers from Artech
House on the whole manuscript. I also thank Dr. Yasuhiro Shimamoto,
Dr. Akio Shima, and Dr. Yuki Mori of Hitachi for their support in improving
the manuscript.
References
[1] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, pp. 391–400.
[2] Mochizuki, K., “Vertical GaN Bipolar Devices: Gaining Competitive Advan-
tage from Photon Recycling,” International Symposium on Compound Semiconduc-
tors, Toyama, Japan, June 26–30, 2016, paper ThB2-1.
1
Contents
Vertical versus Lateral
1.1 Introduction
Power Semiconductor
1.2 Typical Power Device
Characteristics Devices
1.3 Vertical versus
Lateral Unipolar Power
Devices
1.1 Introduction
1.4 Summary
Success of silicon-based electron devices trig-
gered rapid progress in microelectronics and
nanoelectronics that deal with relatively low
power (i.e., less than 10W) (Figure 1.1). Even
in power electronics dealing with much high-
er power, silicon-based devices have played a
dominant role in recent decades; however, they
are reaching the limit of progress set by fun-
damental material properties. Wide-bandgap
semiconductors have thus attracted great atten-
tion as materials for next-generation power de-
vices since they have superior material proper-
ties compared to silicon (see Section 2.7).
The most advanced wide-bandgap semicon-
ductor is silicon carbide (SiC); note, for exam-
ple, that its implementation into railcar-traction
inverters significantly reduced power loss [1].
Another material for next-generation power
10 4
10 2
10 1
Micro-
and nano-
0 electronics
10
10−1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5
Max current (A)
10 5
10 4
High-voltage DC transmission
Application of wide-bandgap
power-semicounductor devices Electric
10 3
Current rating (A)
trains
Auto-
10 2 mobiles
10 1
Switching-mode
power supply
10 0
10 −1
10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5
Voltage rating (V)
(a)
10 7
Application of wide-bandgap
power-semicounductor devices
10 6
Switching-mode
power supply
Operating frequency (Hz)
10 5
Auto-
10 4 mobiles
Electric
trains
10 3
10 2
High-voltage DC transmission
10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5
Voltage rating (V)
(b)
Figure 1.2 Applications of power-semiconductor devices from the viewpoints of (a) cur-
rent rating and (b) operating frequency.
Current
IF
BV
VF Voltage
Offset
Current direction
E Switch Diode
2
U
V
N
W
Inductive load
E
2
On On
Current
Current
IF IF
Off Off
VF BV VF BV
Voltage Voltage
(a) Offset (b)
Figure 1.5 Schematic illustration of (a) zero-offset-voltage and (b) offset-voltage char-
acteristics of power-semiconductor switching devices (IF: forward current; VF: forward-
voltage drop; BV: breakdown voltage).
Figure 1.6 Classification of lateral power-switching devices and diodes as unipolar and
bipolar devices.
GaN layers on GaN substrates, or SiC layers on SiC substrates have been re-
ported; however, lateral bipolar power-switching devices and lateral bipolar
power diodes have not been widely used. Therefore, this section compares
vertical and lateral devices with respect to unipolar power-switching de-
vices and unipolar power diodes.
A = 1 cm2
A = 1 cm2
R on A
R on A
R sub A
Substrate
(a) (b)
Figure 1.7 Schematic illustration of (a) lateral and (b) vertical unipolar power-switching
devices with an area A of 1 cm2, where RonA and RsubA, respectively, denote specific on-
resistance and specific substrate resistance.
10
Specific resistance (mΩcm2)
to be 1.1 (dashed line in Figure 1.8) and 0.53–1.4 mΩcm2 (dotted lines
in Figure 1.8). Moreover, RonA of lateral GaN unipolar power-switching
devices increases with increasing voltage rating but does not exceed RsubA
of GaN and SiC substrates as long as the voltage rating is less than 200V.
Furthermore, as stated in Section 1.1, the previously fabricated lateral GaN
unipolar switching-devices are formed on Si substrates [2], which are much
cheaper and larger than GaN substrates. That means that lateral GaN un-
ipolar power-switching devices are suitable for low-cost and low-voltage
applications such as the switching-mode power supply shown in Figure 1.2.
With respect to a voltage rating exceeding about 400V, the maximum
chip current of lateral GaN-on-Si-substrate unipolar power-switching de-
vices is 70A (A = 0.29 cm2) [8] (Figure 1.9). Because no larger currents have
been reported since 2009, this value seems to be a practical limit. Uniform
operation of lateral GaN unipolar power-switching devices on a larger GaN-
1000
Unipolar power-switiching devices
[9]
100
Lateral GaN
on GaN
[8] [12]
Current (A/chip)
[11]
10
iC
Si
lS
on
a
tic
N
Ga
r
Ve
l
ra
te
La
N
Ga
1
al
tic
r
Ve
0.1
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Year
Figure 1.9 Reported current per chip of lateral GaN-on-Si substrate (open circles),
lateral GaN-on-GaN substrate (open triangle), vertical GaN (solid circles), and vertical SiC
(solid squares) unipolar power-switching devices as a function of the year of publication.
1000
Unipolar power-switching devices
10
Vertical SiC
0.1 1 10
Breakdown voltage BV(kV)
AlGaN
GaN
AlGaN
Anode Cathode
GaN
AlGaN
GaN
Buffer
Substrate
Figure 1.11 Schematic illustration of lateral unipolar power diodes comprising three
parallel AlGaN/GaN heterojunction diodes.
substrates with breakdown voltages and chip sizes of, respectively, 600V and
3.4 × 4 mm, and a maximum chip current of 20A were reported [26].
Lateral and vertical unipolar power diodes with A of 1 cm2 are schemat-
ically illustrated in Figure 1.12. Unipolar power diodes have offset-voltage
characteristics as shown in Figure 1.3, where differential specific on-resis-
tance RonAdiff is defined as dVFA/dIF. Lateral unipolar power diodes should
A = 1 cm2
A = 1 cm2
R on A diff
R on A diff R sub A
Substrate
(a) (b)
Figure 1.12 Schematic illustration of (a) lateral and (b) vertical unipolar power diodes
with an area A of 1 cm2, where RonAdiff and RsubA, respectively, denote differential specific
on-resistance and specific substrate resistance.
gain an advantage over vertical ones in that RonAdiff does not include RsubA.
Unlike lateral unipolar power-switching devices, however, lateral unipo-
lar power diodes with a voltage rating of less than 200V have not been
reported.
In the case of a voltage rating of about 600V, current-density/voltage
characteristics of the above-described three parallel AlGaN/GaN diodes on
Si substrates [26] are compared to those of the reported 790-V 50-A verti-
cal GaN unipolar power diodes (with anode area of 3 × 3 mm) [27] (Figure
1.13). Since the chip size of the vertical GaN unipolar power diode is not
described in [27], two probable sizes (minimum: 3.4 × 3.4 mm; maximum:
4 × 4 mm) are assumed in the calculation of its current density. Even in the
case of assuming the larger chip size, the current density of the vertical GaN
unipolar power diode is larger than that of the three parallel AlGaN/GaN
diodes (Figure 1.13).
While the maximum chip current of lateral GaN unipolar power diodes
[26] has not increased since 2011, the maximum chip current of vertical
GaN unipolar power diodes is still increasing [27] and following the trend of
vertical SiC unipolar power diodes [28], but with a delay of about 10 years
(Figure 1.14).
1.4 Summary
This chapter briefly explains the functions of power-semiconductor switch-
ing devices and diodes through an example case of a three-phase voltage-
source inverter. As materials for next-generation power-switching devices,
300
Unipolar power diodes
100
Lateral GaN
0
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5
Voltage (V)
1000
Unipolar power diodes
[28]
100
Current (A/chip)
N
Ga [27]
[26] ical
rt
Ve
10
iC
on Si
S
al
tic
N
r
Ve
al Ga
1
Later
0.1
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Year
Figure 1.14 Reported current per chip of lateral GaN-on-Si substrate (open squares),
vertical GaN (solid squares), and vertical SiC (solid triangles) unipolar power diodes as a
function of the year of publication.
SiC and GaN are introduced as the most promising wide-bandgap semicon-
ductors. With respect to vertical versus lateral device configuration, these
materials are compared in the cases of unipolar power-switching devices
and diodes. When the voltage rating is less than 200V, lateral unipolar GaN
power-switching devices demonstrate their advantage in terms of lower
RonA; on the other hand, when the voltage rating exceeds 400V, vertical
GaN and SiC power-switching devices and power diodes achieve larger
maximum chip current and higher current density compared to lateral GaN
ones. In accordance with these findings, the following chapters discuss only
vertical power devices.
References
[1] Hamada, K., et al., “3.3 kV/1,500A Power Modules for the World’s First
All-SiC Traction Inverter,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 54, 2015,
pp. 04DP07-1–04DP07-4.
[2] http://epc-co.com/epc/Products/eGaNFETsandICs.aspx.
[3] https://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=slick-sheet-project/vertical-gan-transistors.
[4] Shockley, W., “The Theory of p-n Junctions in Semiconductors and p-n
Junction Transistors,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1949,
pp. 435–489.
[5] Blaabjerg, F., and J. K. Pedersen, “Optimized Design of a Complete Three-
Phase PWM-VS inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 12, No. 3,
1997, pp. 567–577.
[6] Yoshida, T., et al., “Preparation of 3-inch Freestanding GaN Substrates by Hy-
dride Vapor Phase Epitaxy with Void-Assisted Separation,” Phyica Status Solidi
A, Vol. 205, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1053–1055.
[7] https://www.wolfspeed.com/index.php/downloads/dl/file/id/888/product/0/
materials_catalog.pdf.
[8] Kambayashi, H., et al., “Enhancement-Mode GaN Hybrid MOS-HFETs on Si
Substrates with over 70-A Operation,” International Symposium on Power Semi-
conductor Devices and ICs, Barcelona, June 14–18, 2009, pp. 21–24.
[9] Nakamura, T., et al., “High-Performance SiC Power Devices and Modules with
High Temperature Operation,” International Symposium on VLSI, Automation and
Test, Hsinchu, April 25–28, 2011, pp. 1–2.
[10] Ueda, D., “Renovation of Power Devices by GaN-Based Materials,”
International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., June 7–9, 2015,
pp. 422–425.
[11] Oka, T., et al., “Over 10-A Operation with Switching Characteristics of 1.2 kV-
Class Vertical GaN Trench MOSFETs on a Bulk GaN Substrate,” International
Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Prague, June 12–16, 2016,
pp. 459–462.
[27] Tanaka, N., et al., “50-A Vertical GaN Schottky Barrier Diode on a Freestand-
ing GaN Substrate with Blocking Voltage of 790V,” Applied Physics Express,
Vol. 8, 2015, pp. 071001-1−071001-3.
[28] Nakamura, T., et al., “Development of SiC Diodes, Power MOSFETs and In-
telligent Power Modules,” Physica Status Solidi A, Vol. 206, No. 10, 2009, pp.
2403–2416.
2
Contents
Physical Properties of
2.1 Introduction
GaN and SiC
2.2 Crystal Structures
15
holes (i.e., positively charged carriers [see Section 1.3]), in GaN [5]. The
first development of practical GaN optical devices (namely, p-n junction
blue-light-emitting diodes fabricated by Nakamura et al. in 1991 [6]) was
followed by the first demonstration of a GaN electron device on a sapphire
substrate in 1993 [7]. A large lattice misfit of about 13% at growth tempera-
ture [8], however, generated a high density of crystalline defects (namely,
dislocations, as described in Section 2.2.3) in GaN layers grown on sapphire
substrates. In 1999, two-inch freestanding GaN substrates were produced
from 250–300-µm thick GaN films grown on sapphire [9]. Since then,
vertical GaN power devices have been fabricated [10], and electrical
characterization of GaN layers with a low density of defects have been in-
vestigated [11].
In contrast to GaN, SiC has been mainly used as a substrate for growing
a SiC layer, since a technique for seeded sublimation called the modified
Lely method was developed by Tairov and Tsvetkov in 1978 [12]. Subli-
mation was needed because the solubility of carbon in silicon solution is
low (e.g., only 0.1% carbon can be dissolved in silicon at 2,073– 2,273K
[13]). In contrast to p-type doping in GaN, p-type doping in SiC has not
been difficult. However, growing a SiC layer had been difficult because of
the tendency of SiC to crystallize into over 250 modifications (so-called
polytypes) [14]. In 1987, Kuroda et al. proposed a technique called step-
controlled epitaxy [15] to reproduce the same polytype in a SiC layer as that
in the substrate it is grown on. Note that the term epitaxy, which means a
crystalline overlayer having well-defined orientation with respect to the
substrate crystal structure (see Chapter 6), comes from two Greek words:
epi meaning upon and taxis meaning arrangement. Owing to the above two
techniques, the opportunity to fabricate and apply SiC power devices grew
ripe in the early 1990s [16].
In view of the above-described history concerning GaN and SiC, the
remainder of this chapter compares crystal structures, including crystal de-
fects, of GaN and SiC and then describes their energy bands, impurity dop-
ing, carrier mobility, and impact ionization. Since some vertical GaN pow-
er-switching devices utilize AlGaN/GaN heterostructures [17−19], crystal
structures and energy bands of AlN are also described. Finally, Section 2.7
introduces a commonly used figure of merit for power devices.
31Ga: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 4p1 (2.1b)
where the subscripts and the superscripts, respectively, show atomic num-
ber and number of orbital electrons. Both aluminum and gallium have three
valence electrons in their outermost shells, while nitrogen has five valence
electrons in its outermost shells. AlN and GaN are thus known as III-V com-
pound semiconductors. On the other hand, SiC is called a IV-IV compound
semiconductor because both silicon and carbon have four valence electrons
in their outermost shells.
Figure 2.1 Rock-salt crystal structure (solid circles: aluminum and/or gallium atoms;
open circles: nitrogen atoms).
(a) (b)
Figure 2.2 (a) Zincblende and (b) wurtzite crystal structures (solid circles: aluminum
and/or gallium atoms; open circles: nitrogen atoms).
Wurtzite-zincblende energy difference
20
Calculated from wave-function orbital radii
Calculated from classical orbital radii
10
(meV/atom)
Zincblende stabilized
0
Wurtzite stabilized
−10
−20
SiC AlN GaN GaP GaAs
h+k+i=0 (2.2)
(a)
a3 a2
a1
(b)
Figure 2.4 (a) Plan and (b) perspective views of the wurtzite structure shown in Figure
2.2(b) (solid circles: aluminum and/or gallium atoms; open circles: nitrogen atoms).
Determining the intercepts of the plane with the a1, a2, a3, and c axes;
Forming the reciprocals of the intercepts;
Finding the smallest set of integers that are in the same ratio as the
intercepts;
Writing the indices with a bar if they are negative.
Figure 2.5 Typical crystal planes in the wurtzite structure shown in Figures 2.2(b) and
2.4.
Figure 2.6 Atomic arrangement of (a) (0001) and (b) ( 000 1 ) planes in the wurtzite struc-
ture shown in Figure 2.5(a, b) (solid circles: aluminum and/or gallium atoms; open circles:
nitrogen atoms).
Polytypes are expressed with the number of Si-C stacking layers in a unit
cell and the crystal system (e.g., C for cubic and H for hexagonal). The
atomic arrangements of common polytypes (i.e., 3C-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC),
together with those of 2H-SiC, are shown in Figure 2.7, where A, B, and
C are the occupation sites in a hexagonal close-packed structure (Figure
2.8). 3C-SiC (i.e., zincblende SiC) is a low-temperature stable polytype that
is transformed into hexagonal polytypes above 2,300K [30]. 2H-SiC (i.e.,
wurtzite SiC) is also unstable at high temperatures. As a power semicon-
ductor, 4H-SiC is superior to 6H-SiC because electron transport in 6H-SiC
strongly depends on crystallographic orientations (see Section 2.5).
A C A A
C B B B
B A C A
A B A B
C C C A
B B B B
A A A A
3C 4H 6H 2H
(zincblende) (wurtzite)
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Figure 2.7 Schematic cross-sections of common polytypes of (a) 3C-SiC, (b) 4H-SiC, (c)
6H-SiC, and (d) 2H-SiC. Large and small circles denote silicon and carbon atoms, respec-
tively.
A A A A A A
C C
B B
A A A A A A
Figure 2.8 Schematic plan view of occupation sites (A, B, and C) in the hexagonal close-
packed structure.
where CsV and CsI are, respectively, the concentrations of the sites that are
open to vacancies and interstitials, k is Boltzmann’s constant, and T is abso-
lute temperature. In the case of silicon, CsV = 2.0 × 1023 cm−3, FV = 2.0 eV, CsI
= 5.0 × 1022 cm−3, and FI = 2.36 eV have been conventionally used in a com-
mercial process simulator [34]. These values were successfully applied for
boron diffusion in 4H-SiC (see Section 7.4), even though the exact values
for GaN and 4H-SiC are unknown. Other than general vacancies and inter-
stitials, carrier traps in GaN have been investigated [35] and the reported
results on two major point defects (i.e., Z1/2 [36] and EH6/7 [37]) in 4H-SiC
have been summarized [38].
Line defects are called dislocations. Edge (Figure 2.9[a]) and screw dis-
locations (Figure 2.9[b]) are the two primary types of dislocations, while
mixed dislocations are intermediate between these dislocations. An edge
dislocation is formed when an extra (or missing) half-plane of atoms is
introduced. In Figure 2.9(a), the dislocation lying in the basal plane (i.e.,
[0001]) is called a basal-plane dislocation (BPD); the dislocation lying per-
pendicular to (0001) is called a threading edge dislocation (TED). The dif-
ference between a BPD and a TED is only the direction of the dislocation;
thus, a BPD often converts to a TED and vice versa. With respect to screw
dislocations, a threading dislocation (solid line in Figure 2.9[b]) becomes an
origin of spiral growth (see Sections 6.2, 6.4, and 6.5). Note, however, that
in the case of GaN and 4H-SiC, the height of the spiral step differs: one Ga-N
bilayer in the case of GaN and four Si-C bilayers in the case of 4H-SiC. Since
threading dislocations act as nonradiative recombination centers (see Sec-
tion 3.4.2) in GaN [39], they directly affect performance of GaN-based light
emitters, especially laser diodes (LDs). The use of GaN substrates, instead
of sapphire substrates, reduced the density of threading dislocations to the
order of 106 cm−2, thereby improving the reliability of GaN LDs. Threading
dislocations similarly influence carrier lifetime in GaN and 4H-SiC bipolar
power devices locally, but they do not influence carrier lifetime in unipolar
power devices [38].
Areal defects that alter the periodic sequence of layers are called stack-
ing faults (Figure 2.10). In GaN, stacking faults are rarely observed because
stacking-fault energy is high (1.2 J/m2) [40]. Furthermore, theory suggests
that stacking faults in GaN are not electrically active [41]. In 4H-SiC, on
the other hand, stacking faults are common defects because stacking-fault
energy is low (0.014 J/m2) [42].
(a)
(b)
Figure 2.9 Schematic illustration of (a) edge and (b) screw dislocations. In (a), an extra
half-plane is inserted. When the surface in (a) is (0001), the dashed line is a basal plane
dislocation and the dotted line is a threading-edge dislocation.
A A A A A A A A A
A
B B B B
A C C C C A A
A A
B B B B
A A C C C C
A A A
B B B B
A C C C C A
A A A
B B B B
A C C C C
A A A A
B B B A B
C C C C
A A A A A A A A A A
Stacking fault
Figure 2.10 Schematic plan view of occupation sites (B) and stacking-fault sites (C) on
occupation sites (A).
Bulk defects are associated with a volume including voids, cracks, and/
or nano/micropipes. Nanopipes in GaN and micropipes in 4H-SiC are tun-
nel-like defects (i.e., open-core screw dislocations) aligned in the growth
direction of the crystal, and they penetrate the film. In the case of epitaxial
growth of 4H-SiC, micropipes were reported to be dissociated into multiple
closed-core screw dislocations, leading to closure of micropipes [45, 46].
Conduction band
EC
Energy gap E g
ED
EF
EA
EV
Valence band
Figure 2.11 Energy bands for a semiconductor [bottom edge of the conduction band
(EC), donor level (ED), Fermi level (EF), acceptor level (EA), and top edge of the valence
band (EV)].
the valence band is not entirely filled because a small number of electrons
possess enough thermal energy to be excited across the energy gap into the
next allowed band. Since the electrons in the upper band can respond to an
applied electric field to produce current, the upper band is called the con-
duction band. The bottom edge of the conduction band and the top edge of
the valence band are usually expressed as EC and EV, respectively.
When electrons are excited into the conduction band, empty states are
left in the valence band. If an electric field is applied, nearby electrons can
move into those empty states and produce current. The motion of charge
in the valence band can thus be expressed in terms of the vacant states by
treating the states as particles with positive charge. These particles are called
holes (described in Section 1.3), whose concept can be understood through
the analogy of bubbles in running water.
In semiconductors, EC and EV are functions of crystal momentum, and
the energy gap Eg is defined as the difference between the minimum EC and
the maximum EV (Figure 2.12). In the case of direct-bandgap semiconduc-
tors (e.g., AlN and GaN), the momentum at which EC reaches a minimum
and the momentum at which EV reaches a maximum are the same (Figure
2.12[a]); however, in the case of indirect-bandgap semiconductors (e.g.,
silicon and SiC), they are different (Figure 2.12[b]).
In (a), an electron can shift from the highest-energy state in the valence
band to the lowest-energy state in the conduction band without a change in
crystal momentum. In (b), an electron cannot shift from the highest-energy
state in the valence band to the lowest-energy state in the conduction band
without a change in crystal momentum. Energies denoted by the solid ver-
tical arrow come from photons (i.e., a quantum of electromagnetic radia-
tion), while energy denoted by the dotted horizontal arrow comes from a
phonon (i.e., an excited state in the quantum-mechanical quantization of
the modes of vibrations).
Conduction band
Energy
Valence band
Momentum
(a)
Conduction band
Energy
Phonon-assisted
transition
Valence band
Momentum
(b)
Figure 2.12 Energy versus crystal momentum for semiconductors with (a) direct band-
gap and (b) indirect bandgap.
np = ni2 (2.5)
400
293−300K
GaN AlN
300
α0.5(cm−0.5)
200
100
4H-SiC
0
3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy Ephoton (eV)
Figure 2.13 Square root of reported optical-absorption coefficients of AlN, GaN, and 4H-
SiC as a function of photon energy [47−49].
gives ni as
NC = 2 (2πmnkT/h2)1.5 (2.6b)
NV = 2 (2πmpkT/h2)1.5 (2.6c)
and
and they are shown in Figure 2.14 in comparison with the dependence of
ni on T for silicon. For example, at 150°C, ni in Si reaches 1013 cm−3, which
is the practically minimum doping level. In GaN and 4H-SiC, on the other
hand, ni is far below that level even at 250°C. This lower ni is the reason
GaN and 4H-SiC power devices can operate at a much higher temperature.
10 −3
10 −9
4H-SiC
10 −15
GaN
10 −21
−50 0 50 100 150 200 250
Temperature (°C)
energy for donors (i.e., EC−ED) is 0.02 eV for silicon in GaN [51] and 0.059
eV for nitrogen in 4H-SiC [54].
At room temperature, these ionization energies are comparable to
thermal energy (i.e., 0.026 eV), so all the donors (with concentration ND)
are considered to be ionized. The charge-neutrality condition in an n-type
semiconductor is thus expressed as
ND+p = n (2.8)
n2+NDn−ni2 = 0 (2.9)
where NA is acceptor concentration and EF is the Fermi level (i.e., the ener-
gy level of an electron at thermodyanmic equilibrium with 50% probability
of being occupied).
Since electron and hole concentrations are expressed as [57]
n = NC exp[−(EC−EF)/kT] (2.12a)
and
p = NV exp[−(EF−EV)/kT] (2.12b)
μn = qτ/mn (2.15b)
Concentration (cm−3)
1.E+21
21
10 p
NV NA- (NA = 1× 1019 cm-3)
(4.7%) 10 18
1.E+18 NA- (NA = 1× 1017 cm-3)
4.7× 1016
4.6× 1015 1.E+15
(4.6%) 10 15
10 12
1.E+12
(a)−50 oC, E A−E V = 0.2 eV
10 9
1.E+09
00 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4
E F −E V (eV)
Concentration (cm−3)
1.E+21
21
10 p
(8.6%) NV NA- (NA = 1× 1019 cm-3)
8.6× 1017 10 18
1.E+18 NA- (NA = 1× 1017 cm-3)
5.8× 1016
(58%) 1.E+15
10 15
10 12
1.E+12
(b) 150oC , E A−E V = 0.2 eV
10 9
1.E+09
00 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4
E F −E V (eV)
1.E+21
Concentration (cm−3)
21
10 N p
(16%) V NA- (NA = 1× 1019 cm-3)
1.6× 1018 10 18
1.E+18
8.0× 1016
(80%) 1.E+15
10 15
NA- (NA = 1× 1017 cm-3)
10 12
1.E+12
(c) 250oC , E A−E V = 0.2 eV
10 9
1.E+09
00 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4
E F −E V (eV)
Figure 2.15 Shockley diagram to determine Fermi level EF and hole concentration p in
p-type GaN with acceptor ionization energy of 0.2 eV at (a) −50°C, (b) 150°C, and (c)
250°C. Each diagram shows two values of acceptor concentration, NA.
1000
Room temperature
Mobility (cm2/Vs)
800
600
400
200 μn GaN
μp4H-SiC
μn 4H-SiC
μpGaN
0
10 10 17 10 18 10 19 10 20
|ND − NA|(cm−3)
Figure 2.16 Room-temperature electron and hole mobility perpendicular to the c-axis in
GaN [55, 58] and 4H-SiC [59, 60].
EC
EV
Figure 2.17 Multiplication of electrons and holes from impact ionization due to holes.
is ignored hereafter.
where εr is relative permittivity (i.e., 10.4 parallel to the c-axis of GaN [72]
and 10.0 parallel to the c-axis of 6H-SiC [73]), and εo is permittivity in vac-
uum (i.e., 8.85 × 10−14 F/cm). As shown in Figure 2.18, the solution to
(2.18) gives a triangular electric-field distribution. At the onset of avalanche
breakdown, E(0) can be assumed to be Ecritical. Since the minimum thick-
ness of the drift layer at which E becomes zero is WD, ND is given by
E critical
O x
WD
Figure 2.18 Uniformly doped drift layer and its electric-field distribution.
ND = (εrεo/qWD)Ecritical (2.19)
WD = 2BV/Ecritical (2.20)
where
CI = (εrεoqND/2VG)0.5 (2.24)
CI = εrεoEcritical/2(VGBV)0.5 (2.25)
2.8 Summary
Si 1 1 1 1 1
GaN 19 0.9 0.9 5300 320
4H-SiC 13 0.9 0.9 1500 140
References
[1] Maruska, H. P., and J. J. Tietjen, “The Preparation and Properties of Vapor-De-
posited Single-Crystalline GaN,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 15, No. 10, 1969,
pp. 327–329.
[2] Trew, R. J., J.-B. Yan, and P. M. Mock, “The Potential of Diamond and SiC
Electronic Devices for Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Power Applications,”
Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 79, No. 5, 1991, pp. 598–620.
[3] Amano, H., et al., “Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxial Growth of a High
Quality GaN Film Using an AlN Buffer Layer,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 48,
No. 5, 1986, pp. 353–355.
[4] Akasaki, I., et al., “Effects of AlN Buffer Layer on Crystallographic Structure
and on Electrical and Optical Properties of GaN and Ga1-xAlxN (0 < x ≤ 0.4)
Films Grown on Sapphire Substrate by MOVPE,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol.
98, 1989, pp. 209–219.
[5] Amano, H., et al., “Electron Beam Effects on Blue Luminescence of Zinc-
Doped GaN,” Journal of Luminescence, Vol. 40–41, 1988, pp. 121–122.
[6] Nakamura, S., T. Mukai, and M. Senoh, “High-Power GaN p-n Junction Blue-
Light-Emitting Diodes,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 30, No. 12A,
1991, pp. L1998–L2001.
[7] Khan, M. A., et al., “High Electron Mobility Transistor Based on a GaN-
AlxGa1-xN Heterojunction,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 63, No. 9, 1993,
pp. 1214–1215.
[8] Pearton, S. J., C. R. Abernathy, and F. Ren, Gallium Nitride Processing for Elec-
tronics, Sensors, and Spintronics, London: Springer, 2006, p. 6.
[9] Kelly, M. K., et al., “Large Freestanding GaN Substrates by Hydride Vapor
Phase Epitaxy and Laser-Induced Liftoff,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 38, No. 3A, 1999, pp. L217–L219.
[10] Johnson, J. W., et al., “Breakdown Voltage and Reverse Recovery Character-
istics of Freestanding GaN Schottky Rectifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2002, pp. 32–36.
[11] Suda, J., and M. Horita, “Characterization of n-Type and p-Type GaN Lay-
ers Grown on Freestanding GaN Substrates,” Compound Semiconductor Week,
Toyama, Japan, June 26–30, 2016, paper WeB1-1.
[12] Tairov, Y. M., and V. F. Tsvetkov, “Investigation of Growth Processes of Ingots
of Silicon Carbide Single Crystals,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 43, 1978, pp.
209–212.
[13] Scace, R. I., and G. A. Slack, “Solubility of Carbon in Silicon and Germanium,”
Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1959, pp. 1551–1555.
[14] Wesch, W., “Silicon Carbide: Synthsis and Processing,” Nuclear Instruments and
Methods in Physics Research B, Vol. 116, 1996, pp. 305–321.
[15] Kuroda, N., et al., “Step-Controlled VPE Growth of SiC Single Crystals at Low
Temperatures,” Solid State Devices and Materials, Tokyo, Aug. 25–27, 1987, pp.
227–230.
[32] Bockstedte, M., et al., “Ab Initio Study of the Migration of Intrinsic Defects in
3C-SiC,” Physical Review B, Vol. 68, No. 20, 2003, pp. 205201-1–205201-17.
[33] Bracht, H., “Self- and Foreign-Atom Diffusion in Semiconductor Isotope Het-
erostructures. I. Continuum Theoretical Calculations,” Physical Review B, Vol.
75, No. 3, 2007, pp. 035210-1–035210-3.
[34] https://www.silvaco.com/products/tcad/process_simulation/process_simula-
tion.html.
[35] Tokuda, Y., et al., “DLTS Study of n-Type GaN Grown by MOCVD on GaN
Substrates,” Superlattices and Microstructures, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 268–273.
[36] Dalibor, T., et al., “Deep Defect Centers in Silicon Carbide Monitored with
Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy,” Physica Status Solidi A, Vol. 162, No. 1,
1997, pp. 199–225.
[37] Hemmingsson, C., et al., “Deep Level Defects in Electron-Irradiated 4H-SiC
Epitaxial Layers,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 81, No. 9, 2007, pp. 6155–6159.
[38] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, Singa-
pore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, pp. 161–172.
[39] Evoy, S., et al., “Scanning Tunneling Microscope-Induced Luminescence of
GaN at Threading Dislocations,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, Vol.
17, No. 1, 1999, pp. 29–32.
[40] Northrop, J. E., “Theory of ( 12 10 ) Prismatic Stacking Fault in GaN,” Applied
Physics Letters, Vol. 72, No. 18, 1998, pp. 2316–2318.
[41] Stampfl, C., and C. G. Van de Walle, “Energetics and Electronic Structure of
Stacking Faults in AlN, GaN, and InN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 57, No. 24, 1998,
pp. R15052–R15055.
[42] Hong, M. H., et al., “Stacking Fault Energy of 6H-SiC and 4H-SiC Single Crys-
tals,” Phylosophical Magazine A, Vol. 80, No. 4, 2000, pp. 919–935.
[43] Daudin, B., J. L. Rouviere, and M. Arlery, “Polarity Determination of GaN
Films by Ion Channeling and Convergent Beam Electron Diffraction,” Applied
Physics Letters, Vol. 69, No. 17, 1996, pp. 2480–2482.
[44] Beach, R. A., and T. C. McGill, “Piezoelectric Fields in Nitride Devices,” Journal
of Vacuum Science and Technology B, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1999, pp. 1753–1756.
[45] Kamata, T., et al., “Structural Transformation of Screw Dislocations via Thick
4H-SiC Epitaxial Growth,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 39, No. 12A,
2000, pp. 6496–6500.
[46] Kamata, T., et al., “Influence of 4H-SiC Growth Conditions on Micropipes
Dissociation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 41, No. 10B, 2002, pp.
L1137–L1139.
[47] Perry, P. B., and R. F. Rutz, “The optical Absorption Edge of Single-Crystal AlN
Prepared by a Close-Spaced Vapor Process,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 33, No.
4, 1978, pp. 319–321.
[48] Muth, J. F., et al., “Absorption Coefficient, Energy Gap, Exciton Binding En-
ergy, and Recombination Lifetime of GaN Obtained from Transmission Mea-
surements,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 71, No. 18, 1997, pp. 2572–2574.
[68] Niwa, H., J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, “Impact Ionization Coefficients in 4H-SiC
Toward Ultrahigh-Voltage Power Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 62, No. 10, 2015, pp. 3326–3333.
[69] Ozbek, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Planar Nearly Ideal Edge-Termination Tech-
nique for GaN Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011, pp.
300–302.
[70] Baliga, B. J., “Semiconductors for High-Voltage, Vertical Channel FETs,” Jour-
nal of Applied Physics, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1982, pp. 1759–1764.
[71] Baliga, B. J., “Power Semiconductor Device Figure of Merit for High-Fre-
quency Applications,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 10, No. 10, 1989, pp.
455–457.
[72] Barker, Jr., A. S., and M. Ilegems, “Infrared Lattice Vibrations and Free-Elec-
tron Dispersion in GaN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1973, pp. 743–750.
[73] Patrick, L., and W. J. Choyke, “Static Dielectric Constant of SiC,” Physical
Review B, Vol. 2, No. 6, 1970, pp. 2255–2256.
[74] http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/Si/basic.html.
[75] Baliga, B. J., Fundamentals of Power Semiconductor Devices, New York: Springer
Science, 2008, p. 16.
3
Contents
p-n Junctions
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Diffusion
3.1 Introduction
3.3 Continuity Equations
To understand not only bipolar power devices
3.4 Carrier (Chapter 10) but also edge terminations (Chap-
Recombination Lifetime ter 11), p-n junctions are of great importance.
This chapter begins by introducing equations
3.5 Depletion-Region for the diffusion current. Subsequently, the
Width of One-
Dimensional p+n Abrupt chapter derives continuity equations and com-
Junction pares the carrier recombination lifetimes of
GaN, 4H-SiC, and silicon. The basic theory of
3.6 One-Dimensional current/voltage characteristics developed by
Forward-Current/Voltage Shockley [1] is then explained. In addition, the
Characteristics
chapter discusses the multidimensional effect
3.7 Multidimensional on current/voltage characteristics of a non-self-
Forward-Current/Voltage aligned mesa-type p-n junction.
Characteristics GaN and 4H-SiC power devices are often
made from n-type starting material because
3.8 Junction Breakdown their electron mobilities are higher than their
hole mobilities (see Section 2.5). Therefore,
3.9 Summary
this chapter mainly considers n-type GaN and
4H-SiC, as well as their junctions with heavily
doped p-type (p+) GaN and 4H-SiC.
41
3.2 Diffusion
When carrier concentration has a gradient, the carriers migrate from the
high-concentration region to the low-concentration region by a process
called diffusion. One-dimensional diffusion-current densities for electrons
and holes are expressed, respectively, by Fick’s law [2] as
and
Since
qE = ∂EC/∂x (3.4)
(3.3) becomes
Combining (3.2) and (3.5) gives the following Einstein relation for an
n-type semiconductor
Dn = (kT/q) μn (3.6a)
Dp = (kT/q) μp (3.6b)
and
x x + dx
and
Inserting (3.10a, b), respectively, into (3.8a, b) and assuming that mo-
bilities and diffusivities are independent of x gives the final form of continu-
ity equations for electrons and holes, respectively, as
and
EC EC
Photon Photon Photon
emission emission emission
photon photon
absorption absorption
EV EV
(a)
EC
Et
EC EC
EV
(b)
EV EV
(c)
4H-SiC is more than 300 times larger than B for Si. This considerable differ-
ence in B is quantitatively discussed in Section 3.4.4.
Band-to-band recombination plays an important role in determining
carrier lifetimes under high-level injection (i.e., when excess-carrier con-
centration p [= n, due to charge neutrality] is larger than the majority-
carrier concentration). Electron and hole concentrations in an n-type semi-
conductor under high-level injection are given, respectively, as
nn = ND+ p ≈ p (3.13a)
and
pn = pno+ p ≈ p (3.13b)
n1 = ni exp[(Et−Ei)/kT] (3.16a)
and
p1 = ni exp[(Ei−Et)/kT], (3.16b)
where Ei is the intrinsic Fermi level (i.e., the mid-gap level). Since the mi-
nority-carrier lifetimes in heavily doped p-type and n-type semiconductors
are respectively defined as
and
For recombination centers around the mid-gap level, (Et − Ei) becomes
negligibly small, so (3.20) can be expressed as
and
UA = Cnn(np−ni2)+Cpp(np−ni2) (3.22)
Reported Cn values are about the same for GaN (4.5 × 10−31 cm6/s [8]),
4H-SiC (5.0 × 10−31 cm6/s for [9]), and Si (2.8 × 10−31 cm6/s [10]).
τp = 1/[(1/τband-to-band_p)+(1/τSRH_p)+(1/τA_p)] (3.24)
The values of B and Cn described in Sections 3.4.1 and 3.4.3 are used
to calculate τp, which was calculated as a function of Δp when ND = 1 ×
1014 cm−3 (Figure 3.3). In the case of silicon, Auger recombination limits
τp under high-level injection when τSRH_p exceeds 10 μs (Figure 3.3[a]). In
the case of 4H-SiC, on the other hand, band-to-band recombination limits
τπ under high-level injection when τSRH_p exceeds 1 μs (Figure 3.3[b]). The
latter result is mainly due to the relatively large B for 4H-SiC.
In the case of GaN, if the effect of photon recycling is not present, τp
reduces to about 10% of τp for 4H-SiC at a fixed excess-carrier concentra-
tion. This is because band-to-band recombination limits τp even when τSRH_p
is 100 ns (Figure 3.3[c]). However, the dependence of τp on excess-carrier
concentration for GaN under the effect of photon recycling is comparable
to that for 4H-SiC for the following reason. For example, in the case of
AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures, photon recycling factor Φ (i.e., effective
band-to-band recombination lifetime τband-to-bandeff divided by τband-to-band_p)
of 4−6 was reported [11]. In Figure 3.3(d), Φ of 8 is assumed simply because
τband-to-bandeff for GaN becomes equal to τband-to-band_p for 4H-SiC. Since Cn for
10 −2
(a) Si TAuger Tband-to-band
10 −3 T band-to-band
−3
10 −4 10 s
10 −4 s
10 −5
10 −5 s
10 −6 10 −6 s
10 −7
10 −7 s
10 −8 10 −8 s
10 −9
10 15 10 16 10 17 10 18
10 −2 TAuger
(c) GaN without
Carrier lifetime (s)
10 −3 photon recycling
10 −4 Tband-to-band
10 −4 s
10 −5
10 −5 s
10 −6 10 −6 s
10 −7 10 −7 s
10 −8 10 −8 s
10 −9
10 15 10 16 10 17 10 18
10 −2 TAuger
(d) GaN with photon
Carrier lifetime (s)
10 −3 Tband-to-band recycling
10 −3 s
10 −4
10 −4 s
10 −5 10 −5 s
10 −6 10 −6 s
10 −7 10 −7 s
10 −8 10 −8 s
10 −9
10 15 10 16 10 17 10 18
- ) 3
Excess carrier concentration (cm
Figure 3.3 Calculated recombination lifetime in the case of n-type (a) silicon, (b) 4H-SiC,
(c) GaN without photon recycling, and (d) GaN with photon recycling (photon recycling
factor: 8) as a function of excess-carrier concentration. Band-to-band and Auger recombi-
nation coefficients used are, respectively, 4.7 × 10−15 cm3/s and 2.8 × 10−31 cm6/s for silicon,
1.5 × 10−12 cm3/s and 5.0 × 10−31 cm6/s for 4H-SiC, and 1.2 × 10−11 cm3/s and 4.5 × 10−31
cm6/s for GaN.
GaN is about the same as that for 4H-SiC (see Section 3.4.3), the depen-
dences of τp on excess-carrier concentration are similar in the case of GaN
and 4H-SiC.
and
and
WD ≈ (2εrεoΨbi/qND)0.5 (3.30)
p+region n-region
Neutral Depletion region Neutral
region region
q ND
−WDp + + + + + + + + + + +
x
− O WDn
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−q NA
(a)
E
WD
−WDp WDn
x
O
−E max
(b)
−q?ψn q ψbi
EC
EF
q ψp
EV
(c)
Figure 3.4 Abrupt p+n junction under thermal equilibrium: (a) space-charge distribu-
tion under depletion approximation, (b) electric-field distribution, and (c) energy-band
diagram.
WD ≈ [2εrεo(Ψbi−V)/qND]0.5 (3.31)
0 = Dp∂2Δp/∂x2−Δp(x)/τSRH_p (3.33)
Δp(x) = A exp[−(x−WD)/(DpτSRH_p)0.5]
+B exp[(x−WD)/(Dp τSRH_p)0.5] (3.34)
and
In the case that the thickness of the p-region (Wp) is less than Ln (Figure
3.5[c]), the expression for Jn_diffusion(−WDp) changes to
( ) ( )
J n_diffusion −WDp = qni2 Dn / N A − Wp ⎡⎣exp (qV / kT ) − 1⎤⎦
(3.38)
Total
current
J n_drift density
J p_drift
J p_diffusion
x
0 WD
(a)
Total
current
density
J n_drift J p_drift
J n_diffusion J p_diffusion
x
−WDp0 WDn
(b)
Total
current
density
J n_drift J p_drift
J n_diffusion
J p_diffusion
x
−Wp −WDp0 WDn
(c)
Figure 3.5 Current-density components under low-level injection around (a) thick p+n,
(b) thick p-n, and (c) thin p-n abrupt junctions.
Under the assumption that most of the depletion layer has USRHmax,
maximum Jrecombination can be approximated as
Jrecombinationmax ≈ qUSRHmaxWD
= JSR exp(qV/2kT) (3.43a)
and
where VM is the voltage drop across the drift layer, and Da is ambipolar
diffusivity defined as
Da = 2DnDp/(Dn+Dp) (3.46)
10 −2
60-μm φ
300 K
High-injection-
10 −3 level current
(n = 2)
10 −4
Forward current (A)
10 −5
Space-charge Low-injection-level
recombination diffusion current
10 −6
current (n = 1)
(n = 2)
10 −7
10 −8
2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1
Forward voltage (V)
p type
Anode
n type
n + type
Cathode
(a)
p type
n type
n + type
Cathode
(b)
n type
n + type
Cathode
(c)
p type
Anode
n type
n + type
Cathode
(d)
Figure 3.7 Schematic cross-sections of (a) planar and (d) mesa-type p+n diodes: (b) and
(c): show fabrication processes of mesa-type p+n diodes.
ns ps = ND+ p’ (3.50)
s = σvthNst (3.52)
Surface
recombination
velocity
s1 p+ GaN
anode 300
s2 (0.52 μm)
s3 x
r
0.5-μm −
over-etched n GaN (10 μm)
cathode
Figure 3.8 Schematic of a simulated GaN p+n diode, including the following three
surface-recombination velocities: s1 on the side surface of p+GaN; s2 on the side surface of
n-GaN; and s3 on the surface of etched n-GaN.
10 −4
10 −7 s 1 = 1× 10 8 cm/s
10 −8 s 3 = 1× 10 8 cm/s
10 −9
10 −10
10 1 10 2 10 3
Mesa diameter ( μm)
Figure 3.9 Measured (open squares [13]) and simulated 2.7-V forward-biased currents
of GaN p+n diodes as a function of mesa diameter.
simulated using s1 and s3 show much lower forward current even with a
large value of s1 and s3 (i.e., 1 × 108 cm/s). The slope of the two plots indi-
cates that the currents with s1 and s3 are dominated by bulk diffusion cur-
rent under low-level injection. This result leads to the conclusion that the
forward current of a GaN mesa-type p+n diode is dominated by s2, namely,
carrier recombination at the side surface of the etched n-GaN.
Anode
p+Si electrode 35 300
17 −3
(5 x 10 cm / 30 x (μm)
0.5 μm) n-Si (2 x 1016 cm−3/10 μm)
−3
n Si (5 x 10 cm /500 μm)
+ 18
Cathode electrode
Figure 3.10 Schematic of simulated non-self-aligned mesa-type Si p+n diode. The over-
etched depth of the n-Si layer is assumed to be zero.
30 μm 5 μm
0.451 V
(a) 0.6-V forward -biased
0.483 V
0.474 V
0.465 V
0.456 V
(b) 0.8-V forward -biased
0.515 V
0.510 V
0.504 V
0.499 V
0.493 V
0.488 V
0.482 V 0.477 V
3.9 Summary
This chapter compares carrier recombination lifetimes and current/voltage
characteristics of GaN and 4H-SiC p-n junctions with those of a Si p-n junc-
tion. Among the multidimensional effects the chapter introduces, electric-
field concentration around the edge of a non-self-aligned mesa-type p-n
junction is described—to the author’s knowledge, for the first time in semi-
conductor textbooks. Such electric-field concentration leads to large local
current density, which is considered to be the basis for photon recycling to
occur in direct-bandgap semiconductors (see Chapter 4).
References
[1] Shockley, W., “The Theory of p-n Junctions in Semiconductors and p-n
Junction Transistors,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1949,
pp. 435–489.
[2] Fick, A., “On Liquid Diffusion,” Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 100, 1995,
pp. 33–38.
[3] Schenk, H. P. D., et al., “Band Gap Narrowing and Radiative Efficien-
cy of Silicon-Doped GaN,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 103, 2008,
pp. 103502-1–103502-5.
[4] Goldberg, Y., M. E. Levinshtein, and S. L. Rumyantsev, in Properties of Advanced
Semiconductor Materials GaN, AlN, SiC, BN, SiC, SiGe (eds. Levinshtein, M. E.,
S. L. Rumyantsev, and M. S. Shur), New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001,
pp. 93–148.
[5] Trupke, T., et al., “Temperature Dependence of the Radiative Recombination
Coefficient of Intrinsic Silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 94, No. 8, 2003,
pp. 4930–4937.
[6] Shockley, W., and W. T. Read, “Statistics of the Recombination of Holes and
Electrons,” Physical Review, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1952, pp. 835–842.
[7] Hall, R. N., “Electron-Hole Recombination in Germanium,” Physical Review,
Vol. 87, No. 2, 1952, pp. 387–388.
[8] Scheibenzuber, W. G., et al., “Recombination Coefficients of GaN-Based Laser
Diodes,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 109, 2011, pp. 093106-1–093106-6.
[9] Galeckas, A., et al., “Auger Recombination in 4H-SiC: Unusual Temperature
Behavior,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 71, No. 22, 1997, pp. 3269–3271.
4
Contents
Effects of Photon
4.1 Introduction
Recycling
4.2 Family Tree of
Photon-Recycling
Phenomena
65
GaN p-n diodes (see Section 10.3) and GaN bipolar junction transistors (see
Section 10.5.4).
As described in Sections 2.3 and 3.4, photon recycling is the reabsorp-
tion of recombination radiation in direct-bandgap semiconductors such as
GaN, GaAs, and AlxGa1-xAs (x < 0.4) [4, 5]. Its effect in indirect-bandgap
semiconductors, such as SiC and silicon, is thus considered to be negligible.
With respect to AlGaAs-GaAs heterostructures, the influence of photon
recycling on radiative-recombination lifetime [6], diffusion length and in-
ternal quantum efficiency [7], and minority-carrier lifetime [8] has been
investigated; and photon recycling was first utilized in semiconductor de-
vices for reducing the threshold currents of ridge [9] and surface-emitting
laser diodes [10] in 1990 and 1991, respectively. In 2011, photon recy-
cling was also utilized for improving performance of GaAs solar cells and
vertical GaN p-n diodes; in particular, a conversion efficiency η of 28.2%,
beating the previous record of 26.4% [11], and low differential specific on-
resistance RonAdiff (Section 1.3.2), independent of temperature [12], were
achieved. Since then, photon recycling has been applied to multijunction
solar cells and GaN p-n diodes with breakdown voltage BV exceeding 3
kV; for example, in 2013, both η of two-junction nonconcentrator solar
cells and figure-of-merit BV2/RonAdiff of GaN p-n diodes rapidly deviated
from their respective long-term trends [13−22] (Figure 4.1). However, the
detailed mechanisms of photon recycling in the case of these solar cells
and p-n diodes are considered to be different. This chapter breaks photon
21 37.5
18 36.0
(GW/cm )
2
Efficiency (%)
15 34.5
Vertical GaN p-n diode
12 33.0
diff
BV /RonA
9 31.5
Two-junction non-concentrator solar cell
2
6 30.0
3 28.5
0 27.0
1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017
Year
Figure 4.1 Conversion efficiency of two-junction nonconcentrator GaAs solar cells and
the ratio of the square of breakdown voltage (BV) to differential on-resistance (RonAdiff) of
vertical GaN p-n diodes as a function of the year of publication.
recycling into separate types and models these on the basis of experimental
findings.
hv 1 hv 2
recycling
E C1
Active region 2
E C2
hv 1 hv 1 hv 1
hv 2
Active region 1 n-type E V2
contact E V1
p-type contact
(a) (b)
EC EC
EV EV
Figure 4.4 Schematic band diagrams of a forward-biased p+-n junction where intrinsic
photon recycling is taking place.
and
Front metal
Anti-reflection
coating
GaAs cell
Flexible handle
Figure 4.5 Schematic cross-section of reported GaAs single-junction solar cell [28].
1.E
10 −1
-01
25 oC
1.E −11
10-11
n=1
−16
1.E-16
10
1.9 × 10−20
−21
1.E-21
6.0 × 10−21
10
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Voltage (V)
(a)
Current
Vmw.o.PR VOCw.o.PR
0.4 0.8 Vm VOC 1.2
O Voltage (V)
Im
−ISC
(b)
Figure 4.6 (a) Dark current-density/voltage characteristics and (b) illuminated current/
voltage characteristics of a GaAs single-junction solar cell shown in Figure 4.5. In (a), open
circles denote series-resistance-corrected data [28]; solid and dashed lines, respectively,
denote ideal diffusion-current density (whose ideality factor n is unity) with and without
intrinsic photon recycling. In (b), solid and dashed curves, respectively, denote charac-
teristics with and without intrinsic photon recycling. Im and Vm correspond to current and
voltage for maximum power output (ISC: short-circuit current [i.e., photocurrent Iph]; VOC:
open-circuit voltage with effect of photon recycling; VOCw.o.PR: open-circuit voltage without
effect of photon recycling).
Front metal
Anti-reflection
coating
InGaP cell
Tunnel junction
GaAs cell
Flexible handle
Figure 4.7 Schematic cross-section of reported InGaP/GaAs two-junction solar cell [29].
Anode
p-GaN electrode 35 300
x (μm)
(5 × 10 17 cm−3/ 30
0.5 μm)
n-GaN (2 ×10 16 cm−3/10μm)
Cathode electrode
60
Anode radius: 30μm
Forward current IF (mA)
E A = 0.235 eV
300 K
40 Measured
T > 50 ms
T = 0.5 μs
20
T = 50 ns
0
3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9
Forward voltage VF (V)
60
Anode radius: 30μm E A = 0.135 eV
20 E A = 0.185 eV
E A = 0.235 eV
0
3.0 3.3 3.6 3.9
Forward voltage VF (V)
source has a finite area (radius: a), as shown in Figure 4.11(b), thermal re-
sistance (Rth) across a circular cross-section (radius: b) along the vertical axis
(z-axis) can be obtained, as long as heat spreads uniformly in the circular
truncated cone, as follows [33]:
bt /(b − a)
Rth = ∫ at /(b − a)
(1 − κ1 ) t 2 ⎡⎣ π(b − a)2 ⎤⎦z −2dz = ⎡⎣2 / ( πκ1a )⎤⎦ /(2b / t)
(4.3)
2a
Σ Σ
2b
2b 2b
(a) (b)
Figure 4.11 Schematic of net heat-flow fraction Σ from (a) point and (b) circular (radius:
a) heat sources on the surface of a semiconductor substrate.
66
Σ = 50%
Σ = 60%
Σ = 70%
44
22
a = 30μm
300K
0
O 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Externally radiated photon ratio ηe
Figure 4.12 Dependence of estimated increase in junction temperature of the GaN p-n
diode shown in Figure 4.8 on an externally radiated photon ratio. Net heat-flow fraction Σ is
varied from 50 to 70%.
reproduce measured IF of the GaN p-n diode in Figure 4.10 can only be used
as a guide for an effective acceptor level EAeff. To quantitatively evaluate
EAeff due to extrinsic photon recycling, rectangular transmission-line-model
(TLM) patterns [35] formed with GaN p+–n junction epitaxial layers were
employed by Mochizuki et al. [36]. Instead of EA = 0.175 eV [37] used in
[36], more recently reported EA of 0.235 eV [31] is used in the following.
The mesa structure of the TLM patterns (Figures 4.13 and 4.14), with
epitaxial layer structures consisting of p++-GaN (Mg: 2 × 1020 cm−3/20 nm)/
p+-GaN (Mg: 5 × 1017 cm−3/0.5 μm)/n--GaN (Si: 2 × 1016 cm−3/10 μm)/
n+-GaN (Si: 2 × 1018 cm−3/ 2 μm), was fabricated by inductively coupled-
plasma (ICP) dry etching (see Section 7.2). Titanium/aluminum and palla-
dium/aluminum ohmic electrodes, respectively, were then formed by elec-
tron-beam deposition on the bottom surface of an n+-GaN substrate and on
the top surface of a p++-GaN layer (see Section 7.6.1). Finally, the exposed
portion of the p++-GaN layer was etched by ICP dry etching using the pal-
ladium/aluminum electrodes as a mask. Current/voltage characteristics of
the fabricated TLM patterns were first measured conventionally (namely,
with no bias applied to the p–n junction; see Figure 4.13[b]). Under the
80 20 10 5 3μm
I II’ 100μm
(a)
Pd/Al
++
p GaN
70 nm
p-GaN
430 nm
n-GaN
+
n GaN
+
n GaN substrate
Ti/Al
Stage
(b)
Figure 4.13 Schematic (a) plan view of TLM patterns and (b) I-I cross-section of conven-
tional TLM measurement setup.
80 20 10 5 3μm
II II 100μm
(a)
V1 − V2 > 0.5V V
V2 VA V1
IV A Pd/Al
++
p GaN
p-GaN
OFF
IL
n-GaN
+
n GaN
+
VK n GaN substrate
Ti/Al
Metal plate
Glass slide
Stage
(b)
Figure 4.14 Schematic (a) plan view of transmission-line-model (TLM) patterns and (b)
II-II cross-section of forward-biased TLM measurement setup.
assumption that the resistance of the pattern with the largest gap (i.e., 20
μm) is dominated by the sheet resistance of the p+-GaN layer, hole mobility
μp was determined to be 15 cm2/Vs from the current/voltage characteristics
obtained by the commercial device simulator [30] (Figure 4.15).
One of the palladium/aluminum electrodes (anode) was then forward-
biased to the bottom electrode (cathode), and the current/voltage charac-
teristics between the electrodes on both sides (Figure 4.14) were measured.
As shown in Figure 4.16 as an example of potentials V1 and V2 simulated
with anode current of 90 mA in 3-μm-gap/5-μm-gap patterns shown in
Figure 4.14, V1 is almost constant, and V2 linearly decreases with increasing
|V1 − V2| when V1 − V2 > 0.5V. Under this condition, lateral-current (|IL|)/
lateral-voltage (|V1 − V2|) characteristics of the 5-μm-gap region in the p+-
GaN layer are obtained. In Figure 4.16, when V1 − V2 < −0.5V, on the oth-
er hand, V2 is almost constant, and V1 linearly decreases with increasing
|V1 − V2|. Under this condition, |IL|/|V1 − V2| characteristics of the 3-μm-gap
region in the p+-GaN layer are obtained.
2
RT
Current (mA)
1
−2 −1 O 1 2
Voltage (V)
−1 Measured
μp = 17 cm2/Vs
15 cm 2/Vs
13 cm 2/Vs
−2
Figure 4.15 Measured (open circles) and simulated (by using hole mobility μp as a pa-
rameter) current/voltage characteristics of a 20-μm-gap transmission-line-model pattern.
3.1
3.0
2.9
Characteristics in Characteristics in
3-μm-gap region 2.8 5-μm-gap region
−2 −1 0 1 2
V1−V2(V)
Figure 4.16 Simulated potentials of V1 and V2 (in Figure 4.14) of 3-μm-gap/5-μm-gap pat-
terns with anode current of 90 mA (i.e., anode-to-cathode voltage [VA – VK in Figure 4.14]
of 3.24V), as a function of V1 - V2.
When |V1 − V2| < 0.5V, both V1 and V2 are larger than the built-in poten-
tial of the p–n junction, Vbi (about 3V), so the hole current flows not only
in the p+-layer but also in the n--GaN layer. Therefore, the experimental re-
sults for this condition (|V1 − V2| < 0.5V) were not used because of difficulty
in the analysis.
Measured and simulated |IL|/|V1 − V2| characteristics of the TLM patterns
when the vertical anode current IV was 90 mA are compared in Figure 4.17.
When the gap of the TLM patterns is 20 μm (Figure 4.17[a]), measured IL
agrees well with IL simulated with an EA of 0.235 eV. However, as the gap
decreases from 10 μm, measured IL deviates more from IL simulated with
EA of 0.235 eV. (Figure 4.17[b−d]). Since this tendency was also the case for
0.8
(a) 20-μm gap measured
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
E A = 0.235 eV
0.8
(b) 10-μm gap measured
0.6
0.4 E Aeff = 0.144 eV
0.2
(mA)
0 E A = 0.235 eV
0.8
(c) 5-μm gap measured
0.6
IL
EC EC
0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 -
EV EV
(a-1) (b-1)
EC EC
0 - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 - - -
EV EV
(a-2) (b-2)
EC EC
0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - - -
EV EV
(a-3) (b-3)
Supplied Supplied
from from
n +-GaN n +-GaN
0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - - -
EV EV
(a-4) (b-4)
Figure 4.18 Energy-band diagrams illustrating two possible models (i.e., from [a-1] to
[a-4] and from [b-1] to [b-4] for extrinsic photon recycling in GaN p-n diodes.
4.18[a-3]), the same number of electrons are injected into n-GaN from n+-
GaN to maintain charge neutrality in n-GaN (Figure 4.18[a-4]). However,
if the electrons recombine with the holes in p+-GaN, the ratio of ionized
magnesium acceptors does not increase.
If the energy of photons was used by neutral magnesium acceptors to
capture electrons from the valence band (Figure 4.18[b-1]), the acceptors
are ionized and the high-energy holes in the conduction band in p+-GaN
are considered to emit phonons and move to the valence-band maximum
(Figure 4.18[b-2]). In this case, the ratio of ionized magnesium acceptors
increases. And if the holes are injected into n-GaN (Figure 4.18[b-3]), to
4.8 Summary
This chapter classifies photon recycling as external photon recycling or
internal photon recycling. White and UV LEDs are introduced as exam-
ples of the application of external photon recycling. Internal photon recy-
cling, which has recently been utilized to improve the η of multijunction
solar cells and BV2/RonAdiff of vertical GaN p-n diodes, was further classi-
fied as intrinsic photon recycling by band-to-band transitions and extrinsic
photon recycling by transitions involving forbidden-gap energy levels.
While intrinsic photon recycling is responsible for improving η, intrinsic
photon recycling alone cannot explain the improved BV2/RonAdiff. Extrinsic
photon recycling by transitions involving deep acceptors is thus considered
to play an important role in increasing the ionization ratio of deep acceptors
in p+-GaN. To reveal the mechanism of extrinsic photon recycling, however,
further experimental investigation is needed.
References
[1] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, p. 52.
[2] Kizilyalli, I. C., et al., “Vertical Power p-n Diodes Based on Bulk GaN,” IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2015, pp. 414–422.
[3] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, p. 215.
[4] Dumke, W. P., “Spontaneous Radiative Recombination in Semiconductors,”
Physical Review, Vol. 105, No. 1, 1957, pp. 139–144.
[5] Stern, F., and J. M. Woodall, “Photon Recycling in Semiconductor Lasers,”
Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 45, No. 9, 1974, pp. 3904–3906.
[6] Asbeck, P., “Self-Absorption Effects on the Radiative Lifetime in GaAs-
GaAlAs Double Heterostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1977,
pp. 820–822.
[7] Kuriyama, T., T. Kamiya, and H. Yanai, “Effect of Photon Recycling on
Diffusion Length and Internal Quantum Efficiency in AlxGa1-xAs-GaAs
[24] Chen, F. B., et al., “GaN-Based UV Light-Emitting Diodes with a Green Indica-
tor Through Selective-Area Photon Recycling,” IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1122–1127.
[25] Mochizuki, K., et al., “Influence of Surface Recombination on Forward Cur-
rent–Voltage Characteristics of Mesa GaN p+n Diodes Formed on GaN Free-
standing Substrates,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2012,
pp. 1091–1098.
[26] Velmre, E., and A. Udal, “Comparison of Photon Recycling Effect in GaAs and
GaN Structures,” Estonian Academy of Sciences, Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2004,
pp. 157–172.
[27] Sze, S. M., and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Third Edition), Hobo-
ken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, p. 723.
[28] Kayes, B. M., et al., “27.6% Conversion Efficiency, a New Record for Single-
Junction Solar Cells Under 1 Sun Illumination,” 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Special-
ists Conference (PVSC), Seattle, WA, June 19–27, 2011, pp. 4–8.
[29] Kayes, B. M., et al., “Flexible Thin-Film Tandem Solar Cells with >30%
Efficiency,” Journal of Photovoltaics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2014, pp. 729–733.
[30] http://www.silvaco.com/products/tcad/device_simulation/atlas/atlas.html.
[31] Horita, M., et al., “Hall-Effect Measurements of Metalorganic Vapor-
Phase Epitaxy-Grown p-Type Homoepitaxial GaN Layers with Various
Mg Concentrations,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 55, 2016,
pp. 05FH03-1–05FH03-4.
[32] Turin, V., and A. A. Balandin, “Electrothermal Simulation of the Self-heating
Effects in GaN-Based Field-Effect Transistors,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol.
100, 2006, pp. 054501-1–054501-8.
[33] Mochizuki, K., et al., “Optical-Thermo-Transition Model of Reduction in
On-Resistance of Small GaN p-n Diodes,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 52, 2013, pp. 08JN10-1–08JN10-4.
[34] Ohshima, Y., et al., “Thermal and Electrical Properties of High-Quality Free-
standing GaN Wafers with High Carrier Concentration,” Physica Status Solidi C,
Vol. 4, No. 7, 2007, pp. 2215–2218.
[35] Berger, H. H., “Models for Contacts to Planar Devices,” Solid-State Electronics,
Vol. 15, No. 2-A, 1972, pp. 145–158.
[36] Mochizuki, K., et al., “Determination of Lateral Extension of Extrinsic Photon
Recycling in p-GaN by Using Transmission-Line-Model Patterns Formed with
GaN p–n Junction Epitaxial Layers,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 52,
2013, pp. 08JN22-1–08JN22-4.
[37] Pearton, S. J., C. R. Abernathy, and F. Ren, Gallium Nitride Processing for
Electronics, Sensors, and Spintronics, London: Springer, 2006, p. 184.
5
Contents
Bulk Crystal Growth
5.1 Introduction
83
gas (1 atm)
2500
2000
Temperature (K)
liquid + gas
1500
1117
1000
liquid +GaN GaN + gas
500
303
Ga + GaN
0 20 40 60 80 100
Atomic percent of nitrogen (%)
(a)
4000
gas (< 1 atm)
3500
Temperature (K)
3113 ± 40
3000
2000
1687
Si + SiC
1500
0 20 40 60 80 100
Atomic percent of carbon (%)
(b)
Figure 5.1 Phase diagrams of (a) GaN and (b) SiC binary systems under atmospheric
pressure [2, 3].
hydride vapor-phase epitaxy (HVPE) for growing GaN and sublimation for
growing SiC. This chapter also introduces other techniques for bulk-crystal
growth, as they are now being intensively investigated as ways to improve
crystal quality and productivity.
3000
2700 (92 katm)
liquid
2500
49 katm
Temperature (K)
10 katm
1500
1000
500
303
0 20 40 60 80 100
Atomic percent of nitrogen (%)
Figure 5.2 Calculated condensed phase diagram of the GaN system [2].
NH 3
HCl
Figure 5.3 Schematic illustration of hydride vapor-phase epitaxial growth reactor con-
sisting of source and epitaxy zones.
where “l” and “g” in parentheses denote, respectively, liquid and gas. The
gaseous species formed in the source zone according to the above reactions
and NH3 are separately transported to the epitaxy zone by a carrier gas such
as hydrogen, nitrogen, helium, and argon.
In the epitaxy zone, the source species are mixed according to the fol-
lowing reactions:
where P0GaCl and PeGaCl are, respectively, input and equilibrium partial pres-
sures of GaCl.
As for DEEP [10], a SiO2 layer having round openings was formed di-
rectly on a GaAs surface. First, a GaN buffer layer was grown on the GaAs
surface at a low temperature. The substrate temperature was then raised to
the growth temperature of GaN in an NH3 ambient, and a thick GaN layer
was grown. After the GaN layer was grown to a thickness of over 500 µm,
the GaAs starting substrate was mechanically removed. When a GaN crystal
grows with numerous large pits, dislocations are concentrated at the center
of each pit. Dislocation density therefore decreases with increasing distance
from the center of the pits. Up to 150-mm freestanding GaN substrates have
been grown by using 150-mm GaAs wafers [13].
In contrast, dislocation density (about 3 × 106 cm−2) in GaN substrates
fabricated by VAS using a sapphire substrate is relatively uniform [12]. A
TiN nano-mask formed during VAS is used to easily separate GaN from sap-
phire [11]. However, enlarging wafer diameter is difficult due to orientation
deviation. Recently, 175-mm freestanding GaN substrates were fabricated
by a tiling technique that merges small multiple wafers with a thick GaN
layer grown by HVPE [14].
bulk crystal [22] with low dislocation density (< 103 cm−2) has reportedly
been grown by this method [23].
Supercritical fluid
Pressure (atm)
2000
−4000 Critical point
Solid Liquid
Gas
Triple point
800–900
Temperature (K)
Seed
rf coil Grown boule Low temperature
Vapor-phase
to
solid-phase
Solid-phase
to
vapor-phase
Graphite crucible
Figure 5.5 Schematic illustration of a crucible for seeded sublimation growth of SiC.
Due to the low stacking-fault energy of SiC (see Section 2.2.3), poly-
type mixing often occurs [34]. In the case of sublimation growth of heavily-
nitrogen-doped n-type 4H-SiC ( 000 1 ) under optimized conditions, how-
ever, no polytype mixing occurs [35].
Seed-crystal
holder
Seed
Grown boule
Heating
zone
Graphite crucible
Precursors
10 1
< 4-inch solution growth SiC
10 0
150-mm seeded 175-mm HVP GaN
sublimation SiC
10 −1 150-mm HVP
GaN
Figure 5.7 Comparison of reported growth rate and dislocation density of bulk GaN
and 4H-SiC. The diameter of the circles schematically represents the reported maximum
diameter of wafers.
5.9 Summary
Figure 5.7 compares the growth rate, dislocation density, and maximum
wafer diameter of bulk GaN and 4H-SiC described in this chapter. A tiling
References
[14] Yoshida, T., et al., “Development of GaN Substrate with a Large Diameter and
Small Orientation Deviation,” Physica Status Solidi B, Vol. 254, No. 8, 2017,
pp. 1600671-1–1600671-4.
[15] Bockowski, M., “Bulk Growth of Gallium Nitride: Challenges and Difficulties,”
Crystal Research and Technology, Vol. 42, No. 12, 2007, pp. 1162–1175.
[16] Yamane, H., et al., “Preparation of GaN Single Crystals Using a Na Flux,”
Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1997, pp. 413–416.
[17] Mori, Y., et al., “Growth of GaN Crystals by Na Flux LPE Method,” Physica
Status Solidi A, Vol. 207, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1283–1286.
[18] Kawamura, F., et al., “Growth of a Large GaN Single Crystal Using the Liquid
Phase Epitaxy (LPE) Technique,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 42,
No. 1A, 2003, pp. L4–L6.
[19] Kawamura, F., et al., “Novel Liquid Phase Epitaxy (LPE) Growth Method for
Growing Large GaN Single Crystals: Introduction of the Flux Film Coated-
Liquid Phase Epitaxy (FFC-LPE) Method,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 42, No. 8A, 2003, pp. L879–L881.
[20] Kawamura, F., et al., “The Effects of Na and Some Additives on Nitrogen
Dissolution in the Ga-N System: A Growth Mechanism of GaN in the Na Flux
Method,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, Vol. 16, No. 1,
2005, pp. 29–34.
[21] Kawamura, F., et al., “Effect of Carbon Additive on Increases in the Growth
Rate of 2 in GaN Single Crystals in the Na Flux Method,” Journal of Crystal
Growth, Vol. 310, No. 17, 2008, pp. 3946–3949.
[22] Mori, Y., et al., “Growth of GaN Crystals by Na Flux Method,” ECS Journal of
Solid State Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 8, 2013, pp. N3068–N3071.
[23] Imade, M., et al., “Growth of Bulk GaN Crystals By the Na-Flux Seed
Technique,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 53, No. 5S1, 2014,
pp. 05FA06-1–05FA06-5.
[24] Dwilinski, R., et al., “Properties of Truly Bulk GaN Monocrystals Grown
by Ammonothermal Method,” Physica Status Solidi C, Vol. 6, No. 12, 2009,
pp. 2661–2664.
[25] Fukuda, T., and D. Ehrentraut, “Prospects for the Ammonothermal Growth
of Large GaN Crystal,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 305, No. 2, 2007,
pp. 304–310.
[26] Dwilinski, R., et al., “GaN Synthesis by Ammonothermal Method,” Acta
Physica Polonia A, Vol. 88, No. 5, 1995, pp. 833–836.
[27] Dwilinski, R., et al., “Excellent Crystallinity of Truly Bulk Ammonothermal
GaN,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 310, No. 17, 2008, pp. 3911–3916.
[28] Ehrentraut, D., et al., “Reviewing Recent Developments in the Acid Ammono-
thermal Crystal Growth of Gallium Nitride,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 310,
No. 17, 2008, pp. 3902–3906.
[29] Pimpukar, S., et al., “Improved Growth Rates and Purity of Basic Ammono-
thermal GaN,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 403, 2014, pp. 7–17.
[30] Lely, J. A., “Darstellung von Einkristallen von Silicium Carbid und Beherrsc-
hung von Art und Menge der eingebauten Verunreinigungen,” Berichte der
Deutschen Keramischen Gesellschaft, Vol. 32, 1955, pp. 229–236.
[31] Tairov, Y. M., and V. F. Tsvetkov, “Investigation of Growth Processes of Ingots
of Silicon Carbide Single Crystals,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 43, 1978,
pp. 209–212.
[32] https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/07/16/752880/10142036/
en/II-VI-Advanced-Materials-Demonstrates-World-s-First-200mm-Diameter-
SiC-Wafer.html.
[33] Kaprov, S. Y., Y. N. Makarov, and M. S. Ramm, “Simulation of Sublimation
Growth of SiC Single Crystals,” Physica Status Solidi B, Vol. 202, No. 1, 1997,
pp. 201–220.
[34] Knippenberg, W. F., “Growth Phenomena in Silicon Carbide,” Philips Research
Reports, Vol. 18, 1963, pp. 161–274.
[35] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, Singa-
pore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, p. 49.
[36] Ohtani, N., et al., “Impurity Incorporation Kinetics During Modified-Lely
Growth of SiC,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 83, No. 8, 1998, pp. 4487–4490.
[37] Chung, H. J., et al., “Stacking Fault Formation in Highly Doped 4H-SiC
Epilayers During Annealing,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 433–436, 2003,
pp. 253–256.
[38] Rost, H. J., et al., “Influence of Nitrogen Doping on the Properties of 4H-SiC
Single Crystals Grown by Physical Vapor Transport,” Journal of Crystal Growth,
Vol. 257, No. 1–2, 2003, pp. 75–83.
[39] Kordina, O., et al., “High Temperature Chemical Vapor Deposition of SiC,”
Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 69, No. 10, 1996, pp. 1456–1458.
[40] Ellison, A., et al., “High Temperature CVD Growth of SiC,” Materials Science and
Engineering B, Vol. 61−62, 1999, pp. 113–120.
[41] Ellison, A., et al., “SiC Crystal Growth by HTCVD,” Materials Science Forum,
Vol. 457−460, 2004, pp. 9–12.
[42] Hofmann, D. H., and M. H. Muller, “Prospects of the Use of Liquid Phase Tech-
niques for the Growth of Bulk Silicon Carbide Crystals,” Materials Science and
Engineering B, Vol. 61−62, 1999, pp. 29–39.
[43] Syväyärvi, M., et al., “Liquid Phase Epitaxial Growth of SiC,” Journal of Crystal
Growth, Vol. 197, 1999, pp. 147–154.
[44] Kusunoki, K., et al., “Solution Growth of Self-Standing 6H-SiC Single
Crystal Using Metal Solvent,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 457–460, 2004,
pp. 123–126.
[45] Ujihara, T., et al., “Crystal Quality Evaluation of 6H-SiC Layers Grown by Liq-
uid Phase Epitaxy Around Micropipes Using Micro-Raman Scattering Spec-
troscopy,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 457–460, 2004, pp. 633–636.
[46] Kamei, K., et al., “Solution Growth of Single Crystalline 6H, 4H-SiC Using
Si–Ti–C Melt,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 311, 2009, pp. 855–858.
[47] Danno, K., et al., “High-Speed Growth of High-Quality 4H-SiC Bulk by Solu-
tion Growth Using Si−Ti−C Melt,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 645–648, 2010,
pp. 13–16.
[48] Daikoku, H., et al., “Top-Seeded Solution Growth of 4H-SiC Bulk Crystal Us-
ing Si-Cr Based Melt,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 717–720, 2012, pp. 61–64.
[49] Kado, M., et al., “High-Speed Growth of 4H-SiC Single Crystal Using Si-Cr
Based Melt,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 740–742, 2013, pp. 73–76.
[50] Danno, K., et al., “Diffusion of Transition Metals in 4H-SiC and
Trials of Impurity Gettering,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2012,
pp. 031301-1–031301-3.
[51] Mitani, T., et al., “4H-SiC Growth from Si–Cr–C Solution Under Al and N
Co-doping Conditions,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 821–823, 2015, pp. 9–13.
6
Contents
Epitaxial Growth
6.1 Introduction
97
those used in the case of GaAs- and InP-based materials; namely, trimeth-
ylgallium (TMG), triethylgallium (TEG), trimethylaluminum (TMA), and
trimethylindium (TMI). MOCVD of GaN-based materials differs from that
of GaAs- and InP-based materials in terms of growth temperature due to
the difference in the bond energies of group-V precursors; that is, a larger
bond energy (about 400 kJ/mol) of ammonia (NH3) compared to the bond
energies (about 300 kJ/mol) of arsine (AsH3) and phosphine (PH3) [2, 3]
requires a higher growth temperature (about 1,400K) for GaN-based ma-
terials compared that (about 1,200K) for GaAs- and InP-based materials.
An example of MOCVD system for epitaxial growth of GaN is schemati-
cally illustrated in Figure 6.1. Instead of TMG, TEG can be the metalorganic
source. In the case of epitaxial growth of AlGaN and InGaN, TMA and TMI
sources are also used. For n- and p-type doping, supply lines of n- and p-
type dopant gases (e.g., silane [SiH4] and biscyclopentadienyl magnesium
[CP2Mg]) are added, respectively, to the MOCVD system. Accurate control
of the flow rates of these gases makes it possible to grow epitaxial layers of
sophisticated devices.
MOCVD of GaN is usually carried out under a nitrogen-rich atmosphere.
According to first-principles calculations and thermodynamic analysis, gal-
lium is incorporated as gas-phase gallium atoms on the GaN growth surface,
and the migration of these atoms is the rate-limiting process [4]. Experi-
mentally, selective-area GaN MOCVD was used to separate areas with screw
dislocations from those without screw dislocations [5]. Interstep distance λ0
of a growth spiral (Figure 6.2) originating from a screw dislocation is given
as [6].
λ0 = 19γVm/mΔμ (6.1)
NH 3
H2
H2 GaN
substrate
rf coil
(CH3)3Ga
Exhaust
Growth
direction
λ0 Direction of atomic steps
propagating on growth surface
h Side-surface
free energy: γ
Screw dislocation
Figure 6.2 Schematic perspective view of a growth spiral originating from a screw dis-
location. Narrow arrows show the direction of steps propagating on the growth surface (h:
spiral-step height; γ: free energy of side surface of the spiral step).
where γ is the free energy of the side surface of the spiral step, Vm is the mo-
lar volume of the growing species, m is the number of spirals at the center
(e.g., m =1 in Figure 6.3[a, b]; m = 2 in Figure 6.3[c]), and Δμ is the differ-
ence in the chemical potentials of the growth atmosphere and the crystal,
given as [7].
Δμ = RT lnα (6.2)
where R is the ideal gas constant, T is the growth temperature, and α is the
supersaturation ratio, defined as
Figure 6.3 Schematic plan views of growth spirals originating from (a, b) one, and (c) two
screw dislocations.
α=σ+1 (6.3)
10
Nucleus growth
8 Spiral growth
Growth rate ( μm/h)
BCF theory
6
0
1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25
Supersaturation ratio
the frequency with which a nucleus grows to become supercritical, and nnuc
is the critical-nuclei concentration. Equation (6.3) can be rearranged as [9]
where Enuc is the free energy of nucleus formation, nnuc and rnuc are, re-
spectively, the concentration and radius of atoms for a critical nucleus, a is
the interatomic distance, ν is the atomic-vibration frequency, ns is the sheet
concentration of adatoms, n0 is the sheet concentration of adatom sites,
and Ediff is the activation energy for surface diffusion. In the case of a disk-
shaped nucleus, Enuc is expressed as [9]
where h1 is height of one Ga−N or Si−C bilayer (Figure 6.5), and is volume
of an atom. Combining Equations (6.4) and (6.5) gives the well-known
equation for αcritical:
h1 Side-surface
free energy: γ
has been applied to vapor phase epitaxy of silicon [10, 11], GaAs under
an arsenic-rich atmosphere [12], GaAs under a gallium-rich atmosphere
[13], GaAsSb and InGaAs [14], 6H-SiC under a carbon-rich atmosphere
[15], and 4H-SiC under a silicon-rich atmosphere [16]. In this section, a
simple one-dimensional surface diffusion model based on BCF theory [8] is
considered (Figure 6.6). During the diffusion of adatoms toward steps, some
of the adatoms reach steps and are incorporated into the crystal, while
others re-evaporate into the vapor.
When nucleation on terraces does not occur (i.e., α < αcritical—see
Section 6.2), the net incoming flux onto the surface should be equal to the
diffusion flux toward steps; namely,
where Ds and ns(x) are, respectively, the surface diffusivity and sheet
concentration of adatoms, J is the incoming flux, and τs is the mean resi-
dence time of adatoms. If steps are assumed to be perfect sinks for adatoms
(i.e., capture probability of adatoms at steps is unity), the boundary condi-
tion is expressed as
J
ns
τs
d 2n s
−D s
dx2
h
x
λ0 λ0
0
2 2
Figure 6.6 Schematic illustration of a spiral step treated one-dimensionally. Steps with
height h are separated by equal distance λ0.
where Edes is the activation energy for desorption. Growth rate Rg is propor-
tional to (σ2/σ1)tanh(σ1/σ) [8], where
σ1 = 9.5γa/(mkTλs) (6.11)
Large flux
toward step
Supersaturation ratio
Sheet concentration
αc
of adatoms n s
Small flux
toward step
ns0 1
x
λ0 0 λ0
2 2
Gas in
Gas in
Thermal insulator
Gas in
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 6.8 Schematic illustration of a SiC hot-wall CVD system: (a) horizontal, (b) chim-
ney, and (c) planetary reactors.
heated by rf-induction. Since the wafers are heated by radiation from the
front side and by conduction from the back side, temperature uniformity is
easily established.
In the gas phase of SiC CVD, the major chemical reactions are consid-
ered as follows [20]:
For n- and p-type doping, supply lines of n- and p-type dopant gases
(e.g., nitrogen and TMA) are added, respectively. This section describes the
fundamentals of 4H-SiC CVD. Section 6.6 introduces an advanced CVD
technology for trench filling.
As described in Section 2.1, step-controlled epitaxy [21] for reproducing
the same polytype of epitaxial layer as that of the substrate was proposed
by Kuroda et al. In that study, the polytype of SiC layers on SiC (0001) sub-
strates with various misorientations was investigated, and homoepitaxy of
6H-SiC was achieved. Moreover, homoepitaxial growth of 6H-SiC on mis-
oriented 6H-SiC substrates was reported by Kong et al. [22, 23] In the case
of 4H-SiC, homoepitaxial growth was similarly demonstrated [24].
It has been reported that steps appear on the surface of a misoriented
substrate. Since these steps resemble spiral steps originating from a screw
dislocation (Section 6.2), the two-dimensional nucleation theory (Sec-
tion 6.3) and BCF theory (Section 6.4) can be similarly applied to deal
with surface diffusion on the stepped surface of a misoriented substrate
[10−16]. When λs << λ0, crystal growth initially occurs on terraces through
two-dimensional nucleation (Figure 6.9[a]). As described in Section 2.2.2,
the polytype, which is mainly determined by growth temperature, will be-
come 3C under that condition. As a result, 3C-SiC grows with two stacking
orders, namely, ABCABC… and ACBACB… When λs >> λ0, on the other
hand, adatoms migrate and reach steps (Figure 6.9[b]). The dominant steps
of misoriented 4H-SiC (0001) are two or four bilayers high [25], leading to
unique determination of incorporation sites A, B, and C at the steps and
replication of the substrate polytype in the epitaxial layer.
According to a simulation of surface mass fluxes in the SiH4−C3H8−H2
growth system [17, 26], the surface reaction of silicon adatoms with acety-
lene (C2H2), namely,
B B
C C C A A A
A A A A A C C C C C
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
(a) λs << λ0
B B B B
C C C C
B B B B
A A A A
B B B B B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C C C C C
B B B B B B B B B B B B
A A A A A A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
(b) λ0 << λs
Figure 6.9 Schematic illustration of occupation sites (A, B, and C) in the hexagonal close-
packed structure of epitaxial layers grown on surfaces when (a) λs << λ0 and (b) λs >> λ0 in
the cases of terraces and four-bilayer steps.
is one of the most active surface reactions involved. Based on (6.13), the
surface diffusion of silicon adatoms under a carbon-rich atmosphere was
analyzed using two-dimensional-nucleation (Section 6.3) and BCF (Section
6.4) theories by Kimoto and Matsunami [15]. However, in that analysis, the
free energy of (0001) surfaces was incorrectly applied to the side surface of
a two-dimensional nucleus. Therefore, in the following, surface diffusion of
C2H2 molecules under a silicon-rich atmosphere [16] is analyzed.
4H-SiC on 4H-SiC (0001) substrates with an off angle θ of 1°−45° were
grown in a SiH4 (1.5−2.0 sccm)−C3H8−H2 (8.0 slm)−argon (0.8 slm) system
under a silicon-rich atmosphere (i.e, C/Si ratio [atomic ratio of carbon to
silicon] of 0.5−0.75) at T = 1,773K and growth pressure of 80 Torr by Saito
and Kimoto [27]. Here sccm denotes standard cubic centimeters per min-
ute, and slm denotes standard liters per minute. In step-flow growth mode,
where nucleation on terraces does not occur (Section 6.4), the net flux of
C2H2 molecules onto the surface is equal to the diffusion flux toward steps.
From (6.9), which is the solution to the continuity equation (6.7), the flux
of C2H2 in the x direction, Js(x), is obtained as
3
(a) h = 0.504 nm
2
2.0× 10 15 r −1.2×10 14
(λs = 12 nm)
1
1.6 ×10 15 r −1.0 ×10 14
J −ns0 /τs (× 10 15 cm−2s−1)
(λs = 18 nm)
0
−1
(b)h = 1.01 nm
0.6
0.2
0.8 ×10 15 r −0.5 ×10 14
(λs = 36 nm)
0
−0.1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
C/Si ratio r
Figure 6.10 Dependences of J−(ns0/τs) on the C/Si ratio calculated from (6.15) for λs of
12−36 nm. Experimental results denoted by error bars are taken from [27]. Lines and cor-
responding equations show the least-squares fit to the experimental results.
θ = 1° −45°. This λs range agrees with the above estimated values (i.e., 14.4
and 28.9 nm). The absolute value of the intercept with the vertical axes in
Figure 6.10(a, b) give an equilibrium desorption flux of C2H2 molecules, ns0/
τs, of (0.5−1.2) × 1014 cm−2s−1. This value corresponds to the equilibrium
vapor pressure of C2H2 molecules ( PC H e ) of (0.4−1.0) × 10−4 Pa, which is
2 2
obtained from Knudsen’s equation [14], namely,
where h1 is height of one Si-C layer (0.252 nm) and Ω is the volume of the
Si-C pair (2.07 × 10−23 cm3). The free energy of the side surface of a two-
dimensional nucleus under a silicon-rich atmosphere is assumed to be 2.22
J/m2, which is the calculated γ for silicon-terminated 3C-SiC (111) [28].
From (6.17) and (6.18), the off-angle dependence of critical growth rate
(Rc) for mode transition between step-flow growth and two-dimensional
nucleation is calculated at T = 1,773K (Figure 6.11). It is confirmed that
the range of Rc, originating from variation in determining λs (Figure 6.10),
does not depend on h (h = 0.504 or 1.01 nm). It is also confirmed that the
experimental data for step-flow growth in [27] are in the bottom-right
region under the curve calculated using ns0/τs and λs values obtained from
Figure 6.10.
According to (6.17), Rc increases with increasing ns0/τs. According to
(6.13) and (6.16), an increase in ns0/τs, namely, an increase in PC2 H 2 e , is
achieved by reducing the SiH4 flow rate. To maintain the C/Si ratio at less
than unity (i.e., a silicon-rich atmosphere), however, the C3H8 flow rate
10 2
1.0 × 10 14 cm−2s−1
(λs = 18 nm, h = 0.504 nm)
ns0 /τs =
0.5 × 10 14 cm−2s−1
(λs = 36 nm, h = 1.01 nm)
Growth rateR g (μm/h)
10 1 two-dimensional
nucleation
1.2 × 10 14 cm−2s−1
(λs = 12 nm, h = 0.504 nm)
ns0 /τ s =
0.6 × 10 14 cm−2s−1
(λs = 24 nm, h = 1.01 nm)
10 0 step flow
10 −1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Off-angle from (0001) θ (degree)
Figure 6.11 Off-angle dependence of the critical growth rate for mode transition be-
tween step-flow growth (bottom-right region) and two-dimensional nucleation (top-left re-
gion) calculated with the equilibrium desorption flux and surface diffusion length of C2H2
molecules obtained from Figure 6.10. Data denoted by an error bar is taken from [27].
must be limited, resulting in a lower Rc. The calculated curves in Figure 6.11
are thus considered to be close to the practical limit at T = 1,773K.
O E critical
n p n p n p
n-type
n-type WD
Drift layer
2 Superjunction
+
n type
WD
+
Substrate n type
x
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 6.12 Drift layers consisting of (a) an n-type semiconductor and (b) a superjunc-
tion structure, together with (c) their electric-field distributions.
r Solid Solid
r
Solid Solid
(a) (b)
Figure 6.13 Schematic cross sections of nonplanar growing surfaces when the growth
rate and radius of curvature (r) are (a) large and (b) small. Dotted lines and solid arrows,
respectively, show isoconcentration contours and direction of fluxes of growing species in
the vapor.
6.7 Summary
This chapter explains the fundamentals of GaN MOCVD and 4H-SiC CVD
on the basis of the two-dimensional nucleation and BCF theories. In addi-
tion, the chapter explains the trench-filling epitaxial growth of 4H-SiC as an
advanced technology for fabricating SJ structures. To apply this trench fill-
ing to 4H-SiC SJ power devices, however, developing techniques for evalu-
ating distribution of p-type dopant is considered indispensable.
References
[31] Lorenz, L., et al., “COOLMOS—A New Milestone in High Voltage Power
MOS,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Toronto,
May 1999, pp. 3–10.
[32] Kosugi, R., “Development of SiC Superjunction (SJ) Device by Deep Trench-
Filling Epitaxial Growth,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 740–742, 2013,
pp. 785–788.
[33] Kojima, K., et al., “Filling of Deep Trench by Epitaxial SiC Growth,” Materials
Science Forum, Vol. 740–742, 2013, pp. 793–796.
[34] Takeuchi, Y., et al., “SiC Migration Enhanced Embedded Epitaxial (ME3)
Growth Technology,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 527–529, 2006, pp. 251–254.
[35] Sugiyama, N., et al., “Growth Mechanism and 2d Aluminum Dopant Distribu-
tion of Embedded Trench 4H-SiC Region,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 600–
603, 2009, pp. 171–174.
[36] Schöner, A., et al., “In Situ Nitrogen and Aluminum Doping in Migration En-
hanced Embedded Epitaxial Growth of 4H-SiC,” Materials Science Forum, Vol.
600–603, 2008, pp. 175–178.
[37] Negoro, Y., et al., “Embedded Epitaxial Growth of 4H-SiC on Trenched Sub-
strates and pn Junction Characteristics,” Microelectronics Engineering, Vol. 83,
No. 1, 2006, pp. 27–29.
[38] Ji, S. Y., et al., “Influence of Growth Pressure on Filling 4H-SiC Trench-
es by CVD Method,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol.55, 2016,
pp. 01AC04-1–01AC04-4.
[39] Mochizuki, K., et al., “Analysis of Trench-Filling Epitaxial Growth of 4H-SiC
Based on Continuous Fluid Approximation Including Gibbs–Thomson Effect,”
Materials Science Forum, Vol. 897, 2017, pp. 47–50.
[40] Krishnamachari, B., “Gibbs–Thomson Formula for Small Island Sizes: cor-
rections for High Vapor Densities,” Physical Review B, Vol. 54, No. 12, 1996,
pp. 8899–8907.
[41] Mochizuki, K., et al., “Numerical Analysis of the Gibbs–Thomson Effect on
Trench-Filling Epitaxial Growth of 4H-SiC,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 9,
2016, pp. 03560-1–03560-4.
[42] McDonald, J. E., “Homogeneous Nucleation of Supercooled Water Drops,”
Journal of Meteorology, Vol. 10, 1953, pp. 416–433.
[43] J., S. Y., et al., “Filling 4H-SiC Trench Towards Selective Epitaxial Growth
by Adding HCl to CVD Process,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 8, 2015, pp.
065502-1–065502-4.
[44] Yamauchi, S., et al., “200 V Super Junction MOSFET Fabricated by High As-
pect Ratio Trench Filling,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor De-
vices and ICs, Naples, June 2006, pp. 1–4.
[45] Hara, K., et al., “150 mm Silicon Carbide Selective Embedded Epitaxial Growth
Technology by CVD,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 897, 2017, pp. 43–46.
[46] Mochizuki, K., et al., “First topography simulation of SiC-chemical-vapor-
deposition trench filling, demonstrating the essential impact of the Gibbs−
7
Contents
Fabrication Processes
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Etching
7.1 Introduction
7.3 Ion Implantation
This chapter introduces the basic aspects of the
7.4 Diffusion processing steps for fabricating GaN and 4H-SiC
power devices, excluding epitaxial growth (al-
7.5 Oxidation ready described in Chapter 6). Sections 7.3 and
7.4 describing, respectively, ion implantation
7.6 Metallization and diffusion, cover mainly topics associated
with 4H-SiC. Sections 7.2 and 7.5– 7.7, dealing,
7.7 Passivation respectively, with etching, oxidation, metalli-
zation, and passivation comparatively describe
7.8 Summary
GaN and 4H-SiC device processing.
7.2 Etching
Since both GaN and 4H-SiC are extremely inert
materials in regard to conventional wet chemi-
cal etching, they are usually etched with a high-
density plasma, such as magnetron reactive
ions, an electron-cyclotron-resonance plasma,
or an inductively coupled plasma (ICP). Among
these techniques, ICP etching achieves the
highest etching rate; for example, the first ICP
etching of GaN in a chlorine/hydrogen/argon
117
plasma resulted in an etching rate of about 0.7 μm/min [1, 2]. ICP plas-
mas are formed by an inductive coil to which RF (radio frequency) power
is applied (Figure 7.1). Ion energy and plasma density can be decoupled,
resulting in uniform density and energy distributions, even with low ion
and electron energies. Consequently, ICP etching can produce low damage
while maintaining a high etching rate. Anisotropic etching is achieved by
applying an RF bias to the samples being etched. This section describes ICP
etching and wet chemical etching of GaN and 4H-SiC in terms of reported
results.
Showerhead gas
distribution
RF power
Plasma supply
Powered electrode
13.56 MHz
where KOH works as a catalyst and a solvent for Ga2O3. Unlike a nitro-
gen-polar surface, a gallium-polar (0001) surface is selectively attacked and
shows hexagonal etch pits in hot (470−490K) phosphoric acid [20−24].
With respect to the chemical etching of SiC, on the other hand, etching
in phosphoric acid is impractical because of the low etching rate. Instead,
molten KOH has been used to oxidize SiC and remove the formed oxide
[25]. However, contamination of potassium must be avoided, especially
during SiC oxidation [26]. Moreover, care must be taken to create disloca-
tion pits because the KOH-etching rate becomes higher around the intersec-
tion points of dislocations with a surface.
As for wet etching after trench structures have been fabricated, the use
of 25% tetramethylammonium hydride (TMAH) at 358K was reportedly
effective for obtaining smooth GaN ( 1 100 ) planes [27]. TMAH is widely
used in lithography as a basic solvent in the development of an acidic pho-
toresist and is free from the contamination by alkaline metal.
Figure 7.2 Schematic illustration of a PEC etching apparatus used for etching an AlGaN/
GaN heterostructure [30].
profile, and D1 and D2 are the doses represented by each Pearson function.
For Pearson type IV distribution functions, K1 and K2 are normalized con-
stants. Rp1 and Rp2 are projected ranges, and n1, n2, r1, r2, A1, A2, m1, and m2
are parameters related to the range stragglings ΔRp1 and ΔRp2, skewnesses
γ1 and γ2, and kurtoses β1 and β2, as follows:
ri = –(2+1/b2i) (7.4a)
ni = –rib1i/(4b0ib2i–b1i2)0.5 (7.4b)
mi = –1/(2b2i) (7.4c)
Ai = mirib1i/ni (7.4d)
C = 1/[2(5βi–6γi2–9)] (i = 1, 2) (7.4h)
R = D1/(D1+D2) (7.5)
To avoid arbitrariness of Rp2 [53], Rp2 was set equal to Rp1 (Figure 7.3).
Comparing the dual-Pearson parameters with the single-Pearson pa-
rameters shows that the dependences of Rp in the case of implantation
without the SiO2 layer, ΔRp1, and γ1 are almost the same as those stated in
two reports [49, 50], but they slightly differ from those stated in another
report [51]. Although β values of the reported single-Pearson model are not
shown to avoid complexity, the obtained relationship between β1 and r1 in
Figure 7.3(e),
β1 = 1.19β1o (7.6a)
β = 1.30βo (7.6c)
With SiO2
10−2
(b)
0.8
Without SiO2
Δ Rp2
10−1
Δ Rp1
−2
10
(d)
4
γ2
2
γ1
0
−2
(e)
βjo = [39γ j2 + 48 + 6 (γj2 + 4)1.5]/(32 − γj2)
Kurtosis β
103
(j = 1, 2)
102
β2 = 2.95 β2o
101 β1 = 1.19 β1o
1
30 100 300
Energy (keV)
This result suggests that under either condition, the influence of the
amorphization-suppressed channeling [43] might also increase.
7.4 Diffusion
Negligible diffusion for implanting silicon and magnesium atoms into GaN
and annealed at 1,450°C [64] and for aluminum atoms implanted into 4H-
SiC annealed at 1,700°C [65] has been observed by secondary ion mass
spectrometry (SIMS). In contrast, the mechanism of boron diffusion in SiC
has been considered to be very complicated. However, its understanding
should become more important because the use of boron diffusion for fab-
ricating 4H-SiC metal-insulator-semiconductor field-effect transistors was
recently reported to reduce the interface state density near the conduction
band edge of 4H-SiC [66].
Nitrogen
1
Phosphorus
R p (μm)
0.1
0.01
0.2
Phosphorus
0.15
ΔRp (μm)
Nitrogen
0.1
0.05
0
10 100 1000
Implantation energy (keV)
Figure 7.4 Projected range Rp and range straggling ∆Rp as a function of implantation
energy in nitrogen and phosphorus ion implantation into SiC [49, 60–62].
IC are far more mobile than VSi and VC. Under the assumption that ISi and
IC have the same mobility in 4H-SiC, boron diffusion, via ISi and IC, can be
simulated from a certain initial distribution of point defects.
Boron-related centers in SiC are known to have two key characteristics:
a shallow acceptor with ionization energy of about 0.30 eV and a deep level
with ionization energy of about 0.65 eV [73]. While the nature of the shal-
low acceptor defect is accepted as an off-center substitutional boron atom
at a silicon site (BSi) [74], that of the deep boron-related level is not clear.
A BSi-VC pair [73] was refuted by ab initio calculations that suggest a BSi-SiC
complex as a candidate [75]. In addition, candidates such as a substitu-
tional boron atom at a carbon site (BC) and a BC-CSi complex were also put
BC + IC ↔ IB(type-II) (7.8)
where the expression for the charge state is omitted. In the case of 3C-SiC,
IB(type-I) and IB(type-II) can be a carbon-coordinated tetrahedral site, a
hexagonal site, or a split-interstitial at a silicon site or a carbon site [71]. The
reactions given by (7.7) and (7.8) correspond to the following reactions in
the boron-interstitial pair diffusion model [84]:
with charge states j, k, m, n, u, v ∈ {0, ±1, ±2, …} and holes h+. According
to a previous calculation [71], ISi in 3C-SiC can be charged from neutral to
+4, and IC from –2 to +2. If it is assumed that the variations in the charge
states of ISi and IC in 4H-SiC are the same as those in 3C-SiC, the ranges of
m and n in (7.7a) and (7.8a) are limited to m ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, and 4} and n ∈
{0, ±1, and ±2}.
Boron diffusion in an epitaxially grown 4H-SiC structure with a buried
boron-doped layer [85] is modeled as shown in Figure 7.5. In this case,
the concentrations of point defects are considered to be in thermodynamic
equilibrium. The Fermi model, in which all effects of point defects on dop-
ant diffusion are built into pair diffusivities [86], is thus applied. In the pres-
ent case, the pair diffusivities are (BSiISi)u and (BCIC)v in (7.7a) and (7.8a). In
general, when the doping concentration exceeds the intrinsic carrier con-
centration ni [87], where
1020
Symbols: (BSi Isi)
=
1019
As grown
at 1620°C
1018 After 1-h
anneal
at 1700°C
1017 0
(BSi Isi)
+
(BSi Isi)
++
1016 and (BSi Isi)
1015
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Depth (μm)
D(BSiISi) = D(BSiISi)0+D(BSiISi)+(p/ni)+1+D(BSiISi)++(p/ni)+2
+D(BSiISi)−(p/ni) −+D(BSiISi)=(p/ni)2 (7.12)
D(BCIC) = D(BCIC)0+D(BCIC)+(p/ni)+1+D(BCIC)++(p/ni)+2
+D(BCIC)−(p/ni)−1+D(BCIC)=(p/ni)−2 (7.14)
is solved with
and
where CI and CV are interstitial and vacancy concentrations, CI* and CV* are
equilibrium interstitial and vacancy concentrations, JI is the interstitial flux,
Kr is the interstitial-vacancy bulk recombination coefficient, q is the elec-
tronic charge, E is the electric field, k is Boltzmann’s constant, and T is the
absolute temperature. As expressed by (7.16) and (7.17), both the fluxes
of (BSiI)= and (BCI)+ take the effect of electric field into account. The first
step of the simulation is to obtain as-implanted boron profiles along with
the initial distribution of point defects. Once ISi and IC are created, they are
treated as the same I (with an unidentified origin). Similarly, the created VSi
and VC are treated as the same V. Equations (7.12) and (7.14) are therefore
simplified as
1020
Nb = 4 × 1019 cm−3 (p)
15 −3
10
19 Nb = 2 × 10 cm (n)
17
10
16
10
Symbols:
10
15 Linnarsson et al. [81]
1900°C,
As
15-min anneal
implanted
1014
0 1 2 3
Depth (μm)
Figure 7.6 Measured (symbols [81]) and simulated boron-concentration profiles in 4H-
SiC after 15-min annealing at 1900°C.
profiles for Nb = 4 × 1019 cm−3 (p-type) and T = 1400°C [81] are shown in
Figure 7.7. The measured time-dependent boron-diffusion profiles (sym-
bols) are precisely reproduced with parameters D(BSiI)= = 3 × 10−18 cm2/s,
D(BCI)+ = 6 × 10−12 cm2/s, and Kr = 3 × 10−16 cm3/s.
The following remaining issue should also be noted: For applying the
developed semi-atomistic simulation to fit other experimentally obtained
boron-concentration profiles, rSi/rC must be optimized. Since this optimiza-
tion is strongly related to experimental conditions [69], rSi/rC needs to be
optimized for each experimental condition.
20
10 90 min
40 min
19
10 20 min
Boron concentration (cm−3)
10 min
5 min
1018
17
10
1016
1015
As
implanted
1014
0 1 2 3 4 5
Depth (μm)
7.5 Oxidation
In the case of silicon, thermal oxidation represents the most useful method
for oxide growth because of a high-quality oxide/semiconductor interface
and convenience in terms of device fabrication. However, thermal oxida-
tion of compound semiconductors is much more complex phenomenon
than that of silicon.
EC
2.3 eV 2.1 eV
0.1 eV
EV
Figure 7.8 Reported energy band alignment at room temperature [91, 92].
7.6 Metallization
Since Schottky contacts are described in Chapter 8, n- and p-ohmic contacts
are introduced as follows.
7.7 Passivation
Since the surface of a semiconductor is sensitive to a high-electric field, the
free bonds of the surface atoms must be terminated. As a passivation layer,
SiO2 is often used for both GaN and 4H-SiC power devices.
Other than SiO2, high-dielectric-constant (high-k) film has been ap-
plied for GaN diodes. A high-k film generates a greater expanded depletion
region than that generated using a SiO2 film with the same thickness, so
higher breakdown voltage devices are expected. A mixed oxide of SiO2 and
CeO2 (k = 12.3) was formed on mesa-type GaN p+n diodes using MOCVD
[115−117]; the resultant breakdown voltage exceeded 2 kV, while that of
diodes passivated with SiO2 (k = 3.9) was 1 kV [118].
With respect to the application of high-k film to 4H-SiC power devices,
a field plate (see Chapter 11) using HfO2 was simulated [119]. The simula-
tion results showed that a high-k field plate can significantly relieve electric-
field enhancement and increase breakdown voltage.
7.8 Summary
Following Chapter 6 on epitaxial growth, this chapter describes the basic
aspects of fabrication processes for GaN and 4H-SiC power devices. Read-
ers should also refer to the latest papers on oxidation of 4H-SiC as related
research is still being actively conducted.
References
[1] Shul, R. J., et al., “Comparison of Dry Etch Techniques for GaN,” Electronics
Letters, Vol. 32, No. 15, 1996, pp. 1408–1409.
[2] Shul, R. J., et al., “Inductively Coupled Plasma Etching of GaN,” Applied Physics
Letters, Vol. 69, No. 8, 1996, pp. 1119–1121.
[3] Lee, Y. H., et al., “Etch Characteristics of GaN Using Inductively Coupled Cl2/
Ar and Cl2/BCl3 Plasmas,” Journal of Vaccum Science and Technology A, Vol. 16,
No. 3, 1998, pp. 1478–1482.
[4] Kim, H. S., et al., “Effects of Inductively Coupled Plasma Conditions on the
Etch Properties of GaN and Ohmic Contact Formations,” Materials Science and
Engineering B, Vol. 50, No. 1–3, 1997, pp. 82–87.
[5] Cho, H., et al., “Low Bias Dry Etching of III-Nitrides in Cl2-Based Inductive-
ly Coupled Plasmas,” Journal of Electronics Materials, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1998, pp.
166–170.
[6] Cho, H., et al., “Comparison of Inductively Coupled Plasma Cl2 and Cl4/H2
Etching of III-Nitrides,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, Vol. 16, No.
3, 1998, pp. 1631–1635.
[7] Lee, J. W., et al., “Dry Etching of GaN and Related Materials: Comparison of
Techniques,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics of Quantum Electronics, Vol. 4, No. 3,
1998, pp. 557–563.
[8] Smith, S. A., et al., “High Rate and Selective Etching of GaN, AlGaN, and AlN
Using an Inductively Coupled Plasma,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 71, No. 25,
1997, pp. 3631–3633.
[9] Ohta, H., et al., “Ion-Irradiation Damage on GaN p-n Junction Diodes by In-
ductively Coupled Plasma Etching and Its Recovery by Thermal Treatment,”
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, Vol. 409, 2017, pp. 65–68.
[10] Cao, L. H., B. H. Li, and J. H. Zhao, “Etching of SiC Using Inductively Cou-
pled Plasma,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 145, No. 10, 1998, pp.
3609–3612.
[11] Wang, J. J., et al., “Inductively Coupled Plasma Etching of Bulk 6H-SiC and
Thin-Film SiCN in NF3 Chemistries,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology
A, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1998, pp. 2204–2209.
[12] Khan, F. A., and I. Adesida, “High Rate Etching of SiC Using Inductively Cou-
pled Plasma Reactive Ion Etching in SF6-Based Gas Mixtures,” Applied Physics
Letters, Vol. 75, No. 15, 1999, pp. 2268–2270.
[13] Jiang, L. D., et al., “Inductively Coupled Plasma Etching of SiC in SF6/O2 and
Etch-Induced Surface Chemical Bonding Modifications,” Journal of Applied
Physics, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2003, pp. 1376–1383.
[14] Mikami, H., et al., “Role of Hydrogen in Dry Etching of Silicon Carbide Using
Inductively Coupled and Capacitively Coupled Plasma,” Japanese Journal of
Applied Physics, Vol. 44, No. 6A, 2005, pp. 3817–3821.
[15] Kosugi, R., et al., “Strong Impact of Slight Trench Direction Misalignment
from [ 1120 ] on Deep Trench Filling Epitaxy for SiC Super-Junction Devices,”
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 56, 2017, pp. 04CR05-1–04CR05-4.
[16] Zhuang, D., and J. H. Edgar, “Wet Etching of GaN, AlN, and SiC,” Materials
Science and Engineering Reports, Vol. 48, 2005, pp. 1–46.
[17] Palacios, T., et al., “Wet Etching of GaN Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy
on Si(111),” Semiconductor Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2000, pp.
996–1000.
[18] Rouviere, J. L, et al., “Polarity Determination for GaN Films Grown on (0001)
Sapphire and High-Pressure-Grown GaN Single Crystals,” Applied Physics Let-
ters, Vol. 73, No. 6, 1998, pp. 668–670.
[19] Li, D., et al., “Selective Etching of GaN Polar Surface in Potassium Hydrox-
ide Solution Studied by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,” Journal of Applied
Physics, Vol. 90, No. 8, 2001, pp. 4219–4223.
[20] Morimoto, Y., “Few Characteristics of Epitaxial GaN–Etching and Thermal De-
composition,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 121, No. 10, 1974, pp.
1383–1384.
[21] Shintani, A. and S. Minagawa, “Etching of GaN Using Phosphoric Acid,” Jour-
nal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 123, No. 5, 1976, pp. 706–713.
[22] Kim, B. J., et al., “Wet Etching of (0001) GaN/Al2O3 Grown by MOVPE,” Jour-
nal of Electronic Materials, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1998, pp. L32–L34.
[23] Hong, S. K., et al., “Evaluation of Nanopipes in MOCVD Grown (0001) GaN/
Al2O3 by Wet Chemical Etching,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 191, No. 1–2,
1998, pp. 275–278.
[24] Mynbaeva, M. G., et al., “Wet Chemical Etching of GaN in H3PO4 with Al
ions,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Vol. 2, No. 8, 1999, pp. 404–406.
[25] Katsuno, M., et al., “Mechanism of Molten KOH Etching of SiC Single Crys-
tals: Comparative Study with Thermal Oxidation,” Japanese Journal of Applied
Physics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 1999, pp. 4661–4665.
[26] Stagg, J. P., “Drift Mobilities of Na+ and K+ Ions in SiO2 Films,” Applied Physics
Letters, Vol. 31, No. 8, 1977, pp. 532–534.
[27] Kodama, M., “GaN-Based Trench Gate Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field-Ef-
fect Transistor Fabricated with Novel Wet Etching,” Applied Physics Express, Vol.
1, 2008, pp. 021104-1–021104-3.
[28] Weyher, J. L., et al., “Recent Advances in Defect-Selective Etching of GaN,”
Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 210, No. 1–3, 2000, pp. 151–156.
[29] Minsky, M. S., M. White, and E. L. Hu, “Room-Temperature Photoen-
hanced Wet Etching of GaN,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 68, No. 11, 1996, pp.
1531–1533.
[30] Lee, J.-S., et al., “Photoelectrochemical Gate Recess Etching for the Fabrica-
tion of AlGaN/GaN Heterostructure Field Effect Transistor,” Japanese Journal of
Applied Physics, Vol. 40, No. 3A, 2001, pp. L198–L200.
[31] Chang, W. H., “Micromachining of p-Type 6H-SiC by Electrochemical Etch-
ing,” Sensors and Actuators A, Vol. 112, No. 1, 2004, pp. 36–43.
[32] Ke, Y., et al., “Surface Polishing by Electrochemical Etching of p-Type 4H-SiC,”
Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 106, No. 6, 2009, pp. 064901-1–064901-7.
[33] Shor, J. S., et al., “Characterization of Nanocrystallites in Porous p-Type 6H-
SiC,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 76, No. 7, 1994, pp. 4045–4049.
[34] Shor, J. S., R. M. Osgood, and A. D. Kutz, “Photoelectrochemical Conductivity
Selective Etch Stops for SiC,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 60, No. 8, 1992, pp.
1001–1003.
[51] Lee, S.-S. and S.-G. Park, “Empirical Depth Profile Model for Ion Implanta-
tion in 4H-SiC,” Journal of Korean Physical Society, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2002, pp.
L591–L593.
[52] Tasch, A. F., et al., “An Improved Approach to Accurately Model Shallow B
and BF2 Implants in Silicon,” Journal of the Journal of Electrochemical Society, Vol.
136, No. 3, 1989, pp. 810–814.
[53] Suzuki, K., et al., “Comprehensive Analytical Expression for Dose Dependent
Ion-Implanted Impurity Concentration Profiles,” Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 42,
No. 9, 1998, pp. 1671–1678.
[54] Mochizuki, K. and H. Onose, “Dual-Pearson Approach to Model Ion-Implant-
ed Al Concentration Profiles for High-Precision Design of High-Voltage 4H-SiC
Power Devices,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 600–603, 2009, pp. 607–610.
[55] Mochizuki, K., and N. Yokoyama, “Two-Dimensional Modeling of Aluminum-
Ion Implantation into 4H-SiC,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 679–680, 2011,
pp. 405–408.
[56] Mochizuki, K., and N. Yokoyama, “Two-Dimensional Analytical Model for
Concentration Profiles of Aluminum Implanted into 4H-SiC (0001),” IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 58, 2011, pp. 455–459.
[57] http://www.silvaco.com/products/tcad/process_simulation/process_simula-
tion.html.
[58] https://www.synopsys.com/silicon/tcad/process-simulation.html.
[59] Mochizuki, K., et al., “A-Commercial-Simulator-Based Numerical-Analysis
Methodology for 4H-SiC Power Device Formed on Misoriented (0001) Sub-
strates,” IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society, Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 316–322.
[60] Ahmed, S., et al., “Empirical Depth Simulator for Ion Implantation in 6H -
SiC,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 77, No. 12, 1995, pp. 6194–6200.
[61] Rao, M. V., et al., “Donor Ion-Implantation Doping into SiC,” Journal of Elec-
tronic Materials, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1999, pp. 334–340.
[62] Janson, M. S., et al., “Range Distributions of Implanted Ions in Silicon Car-
bide,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 389–393, 2002, pp. 779–782.
[63] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, Singa-
pore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, pp. 191–193.
[64] Wilson, R. G., et al., “Redistribution and Activation of Implanted S, Se, Te, Be,
Mg, and C in GaN,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, Vol. 17, No. 4,
1999, pp. 1226–1229.
[65] Kosugi, R., et al., “First Experimental Demonstration of SiC Super-Junction
(SJ) Structure by Multiepitaxial Method,” International Symposium on Power
Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Waikoloa, June 2014, pp. 346–349.
[66] Okamoto, D., et al., “Improved Channel Mobility in 4H-SiC MOSFETs by
Boron Passivation,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 35, No. 12, 2014, pp.
1176–1178.
[67] Mokhov, E. N., E. E. Goncharov, and G. G. Ryabova, “Diffusion of Boron in
p-Type Silicon Carbide,” Soviet Physics–Semiconductors, Vol. 18, 1984, pp. 27–30.
[68] Bracht, H., N. A. Stolwijl, and G. Pensl, “Diffusion of Boron in Silicon Carbide:
Evidence for the Kick-Out Mechanism,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 77, No. 20,
2000, pp. 3188–3120.
[69] Rüschenschmidt, K., et al., “Self-Diffusion in Isotopically Enriched Silicon
Carbide and Its Correlation with Dopant Diffusion,” Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 96, No. 3, 2004, pp. 1458–1463.
[70] Rurali, R., et al., “Theoretical Evidence for the Kick-Out Mechanism for B Dif-
fusion in SiC,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 81, No. 16, 2002, pp. 2989–2991.
[71] Bockstedte, M., A. Mattausch, and O. Pankratov, “Ab Initio Study of the Mi-
gration of Intrinsic Defects in 3C-SiC,” Physical Review B, Vol. 68, No. 20, 2003,
pp. 205201-1–205201-17.
[72] Gao, H., et al., “Atomistic Study of Intrinsic Defect Migration in 3C-SiC,” Phys-
ical Review B, Vol. 69, No. 24, 2004, pp. 245205-1–245205-5.
[73] Duijin-Arnold, A. V., et al., “Electronic Structure of the Deep Boron Ac-
ceptor in Boron-Doped 6H-SiC,” Physical Review B, Vol. 57, No. 3, 1998, pp.
1607–1619.
[74] Duijin-Arnold, A. V., et al., “Spatial Distribution of the Electronic Wave Func-
tion of the Shallow Boron Acceptor in 4H- and 6H-SiC,” Physical Review B, Vol.
60, No. 23, 1999, pp. 15829–15847.
[75] Aradi, B., et al., “Boron Centers in 4H-SiC,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 353–
356, 2001, pp. 455–458.
[76] Bockstedte, M., A. Mattausch, and O. Pankratov, “Boron in SiC: Structure and
Kinetics,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 353–356, 2001, pp. 447–450.
[77] Srindhara, S. G., et al., “Photoluminescence and Transport Studies of Boron in
4H-SiC,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 83, No. 12, 1998, pp. 7909–7920.
[78] Sadigh, B., et al., “Mechanism of Boron Diffusion in Silicon: An Ab Initio and
Kinetic Monte Carlo Study,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 83, No. 21, 1999, pp.
4341–4344.
[79] Windle, W., et al., “First Principles Study of Boron Diffusion in Silicon,” Physi-
cal Review Letters, Vol. 83, No. 21, 1999, pp. 4345–4348.
[80] Linnarsson, M. K., et al., “Aluminum and Boron Diffusion in 4H-SiC,” Materi-
als Research Society Proceedings, Vol. 742, Warrendale, Dec. 2002, paper K6.1.
[81] Linnarsson, M. K., et al., “Boron Diffusion in Intrinsic, n-Type amd p-Type
4H-SiC,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 457–460, 2004, pp. 917–920.
[82] Mochizuki, K., H. Shimizu, and N. Yokoyama, “Dual-Sublattice Modeling and
Semi-Atomistic Simulation of Boron Diffusion in 4H-Silicon Carbide,” Japa-
nese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 48, 2009, pp. 031205-1–031205-6.
[83] Bockstedte, M., A. Mattausch, and O. Pankratov, “Different Roles of Carbon
and Silicon Interstitials in the Interstitial-Mediated Boron Diffusion in SiC,”
Physical Review B, Vol. 70, No. 11, 2004, pp. 115203-1–115203-13.
[84] Bracht, H., “Self- and Foreign-Atom Diffusion in Semiconductor Isotope Het-
erostructures. I. Continuum Theoretical Calculations,” Physical Review B, Vol.
75, No. 3, 2007, pp. 035210-1–035210-16.
[85] Janson, M. S., et al., “Transient Enhanced Diffusion of Implanted Boron in 4H-
Silicon Carbide,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 76, No. 11, 2000, pp. 1434–1436.
[86] Plummer, G. H., M. D. Deal, and P. B. Griffin, Silicon VLSI Technology, Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000, p. 411.
[87] Baliga, B. J., Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World Scientific, 2005,
pp. 978–981.
[88] Lee, C.-T., H.-Y. Lee, and H.-W. Chen, “GaN MOS Device Using SiO2–Ga2O3
Insulator Grown by Photoelectrochemical Oxidation Method,” IEEE Electron
Device Letters, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2003, pp. 54–56.
[89] Huang, L.-S., et al., “AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor High-Electron
Mobility Transistors Using Oxide Insulator Grown by Photoelectrochemi-
cal Oxidation Method,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2008, pp.
284–286.
[90] Kim, H., S.-J. Park, and H. Hwang, “Thermally Oxidized GaN Film for Use
as Gate Insulators,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, Vol. 19, No. 2,
2001, pp. 579–581.
[91] Wei, W., et al., “Valence Band Offset of β-Ga2O3/Wurtzite GaN Heterostruc-
ture Measured by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,” Nanoscale Research Let-
ters, Vol. 7, 2012, pp. 562-1–562-5.
[92] Hua, M., et al., “Integration of LPCVD-SiNx Gate Dielectric with Recessed-
Gate E-Mode GaN MIS-FETs: Toward High Performance, High Stability and
Long TDDB Lifetime,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec.
2016, pp. 260–263.
[93] Deal, B. E., and A. S. Grove, “General Relationship for the Thermal Oxidation
of Silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 36, No. 12, 1965, pp. 3770–3778.
[94] Song, Y., et al., “Modified Deal–Grove Model for the Thermal Oxidation of Sil-
icon Carbide,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 95, No. 9, 2004, pp. 4953–4957.
[95] Hijikata, Y., Y. Yaguchi, and S. Yoshida, “A Kinetic Model of Silicon Carbide
Oxidation Based on the Interface Silicon and Carbon Emission Phenomenon,”
Applied Physics Express, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 021203-1–021203-3.
[96] Watanabe, H., et al., “Energy Band Structure of SiO2/4H-SiC Interfaces and
Its Modulation Induced by Intrinsic and Extrinsic Interface Transfer,” Materials
Science Forum, Vol. 679–680, 2011, pp. 386–389.
[97] Noborio, M, et al., “Reliability of Nitrided Gate Oxide for n- and p-Type 4H-
SiC(0001) Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Devices,” Japanese Journal of Applied
Physics, Vol. 50, No. 9R, 2011, pp. 090201-1–090201-3.
[98] Kimoto, T., et al., “Interface Properties of Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Struc-
tures on 4H-SiC{0001} and ( 1120 ) Formed by N2O Oxidation,” Japanese
Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2005, pp. 1213–1218.
[99] Fan, Z., et al., “Very Low Resistance Multilayer Ohmic Contact to n-GaN,”
Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 68, No. 12, 1996, pp. 1672–1674.
[100] Liu, Q. Z., and S. S. Lau, “A Review of the Metal–GaN Contact Technology,”
Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 42, No. 5, 1998, pp. 677–691.
[101] Cole, M. W, et al., “Post Growth Rapid Thermal Annealing of GaN: The Rela-
tionship Between Annealing Temperature, GaN Crystal Quality, and Contact–
GaN Interfacial Structure,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 71, No. 20, 1997, pp.
3004–3006.
[102] Lee, J.-L., et al., “Ohmic Contact Formation Mechanism of Nonalloyed Pd
Contacts to p-Type GaN Observed by Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy,” Ap-
plied Physics Letters, Vol. 74, No. 16, 1999, pp. 2289–2291.
[103] Hasegawa, H., and H. Ohno, “Unified Disorder Induced Gap State Model for
Insulator-Semiconductor and Metal-Semiconductor Interfaces,” Journal of
Vacuum Science and Technology B, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1986, pp. 1130–1138.
[104] Kim, D.-W., et al., “Electrical Properties of Pd-Based Ohmic Contact to p-GaN,”
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2001, pp. 609–614.
[105] Adivarahan, V., et al., “Very-Low-Specific-Resistance Pd/Ag/Au/Ti/Au Al-
loyed Ohmic Contact to p GaN for High-Current Devices,” Applied Physics Let-
ters, Vol. 78, No. 18, 2001, pp. 2781–2783.
[106] Porter, L. M., and R. F. Davis, “A Critical Review of Ohmic and Rectifying Con-
tacts for Silicon Carbide,” Materials Science and Engineering B, Vol. 34, No. 2–3,
1995, pp. 83–105.
[107] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, Singa-
pore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, pp. 259–261.
[108] Reshanov, S. A., et al., “Effect of an Intermediate Graphite Layer on the Elec-
tronic Properties of Metal/SiC Contacts,” Physica Status Solidi B, Vol. 245, No. 7,
2008, pp. 1369–1377.
[109] Crofton, J., et al., “Titanium and Aluminum-Titanium Ohmic Contacts to p-
Type SiC,” Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 41, No. 11, 1997, pp. 1725–1729.
[110] Vassilevski, K., et al., “Phase Formation at Rapid Thermal Annealing of Al/Ti/
Ni Ohmic Contacts on 4H-SiC,” Materials Science and Engineering B, Vol. 80, No.
1–3, 1997, pp. 370–373.
[111] Crofton, J., et al., “Contact Resistance Measurement on p-Type 6H-SiC,” Ap-
plied Physics Letters, Vol. 62, No. 4, 1997, pp. 384–386.
[112] Kassamokova, L., et al., “Thermostable Ohmic Contacts on p-Type SiC,” Mate-
rials Science Forum, Vol. 264–268, 1998, pp. 787–790.
[113] Fursin, L. G, J. H. Zhao, and M. Weiner, “Nickel Ohmic Contacts to p- and n-
Type 4H-SiC,” Electronics Letters, Vol. 37, No. 17, 2001, pp. 1092–1093.
[114] Lee, S. K., C. M. Zettering, and M. Östling, “Low Resistivity Ohmic Titanium
Carbide Contacts to n- and p-Type 4H-Silicon Carbide,” Solid-State Electronics,
Vol. 44, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1179–1186.
[115] Ohno, H., et al., “Chemical Vapor Deposition of CeO2 Films Using a Liquid
Metalorganic Source,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2006,
pp. G87–G89.
[116] Tagui, K., et al., “The Electrical Property of CeO2 Films Deposited by MOCVD
on Si (100),” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2007,
pp. D73–D75.
[117] Matsumura, T., et al., “MOCVD of CeO2 and SiO2 Mixture Films Using Alkoxy
Sources,” ECS Solid State Letters, Vol. 4, No. 12, 2015, pp. N17–N19.
[118] Yoshino, M., et al., “High-k Dielectric Passivation for GaN Diode with a Field
Plate Termination,” Electronics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016, pp. 15-1–15-7.
[119] Song, Q.-W., et al., “Simulation Study on 4H-SiC Power Devices with High-k
Dielectric FP Terminations,” Diamond & Related Materials, Vol. 22, 2012, pp.
42–47.
8
Contents
Metal-Semiconductor
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Schottky-Barrier
Contacts and Unipolar
Lowering
Power Diodes
8.3 Forward-Biased
Schottky Junction
8.4 Forward-Current/
Voltage Characteristics 8.1 Introduction
Based on Diffusion
Theory As described in Chapter 1, a power diode, which
8.5 Forward-Current/ exhibits forward voltage drop VF at forward
Voltage Characteristics current IF (Figure 1.8), is one of the building
Based on TED Theory blocks of power-electronic circuits. In the case
8.6 Reverse-Current/ of a bipolar diode, qVF takes a value approxi-
Voltage Characteristics mately equivalent to the bandgap energy Eg of
Based on TFE Theory the semiconductor used, where q is elementary
8.7 Pure SBDs charge (1.6 × 10−19 C). For example, the mea-
sured forward-current/voltage characteristics
8.8 Graded AlGaN SBDs of a GaN p+n diode (Figure 8.1[a]) [1] (which
8.9 4H-SiC SBDs with a is shown in Figure 3.6) are plotted on a linear
Thin p+-Type Layer scale in Figure 8.1(b). At IF of 5.2 mA (i.e., 180
A/cm2), VF becomes Eg/q of GaN (i.e., 3.44V
8.10 Shielded Planar
SBDs [2]). To further decrease VF, a unipolar diode
must therefore be used. Another advantage of
8.11 Summary a unipolar diode is absence of minority-carrier
injection, leading to a very fast turnoff and low
switching energy.
143
10 −1
60-μm Φ
10 −2 300 K
10 −4
10 −5
10 −6
10 −7
2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9
Forward voltage (V)
(a)
25
60-μm Φ
300 K
Forward current (mA)
20
15
10
5.2
5
3.44
0
2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9
Forward voltage (V)
(b)
Vacuum
qX
EC qX
qΦm EF qΦm
qΦn
EC
EF
EV
EV
(a) (b)
qΨbi
q(Φm−X)
EC
EF
WD
EV
(c)
Figure 8.2 Energy-band diagrams of a metal and an n-type semiconductor (a) in separa-
tion and connected with (b) finite and (c) no gaps.
When the metal and the semiconductor are almost in contact and sepa-
rated with a finite gap (Figure 8.2[b]), the Fermi level of the metal, which
is equal to qΦm, coincides with the EF of the semiconductor in equilibrium.
Note that in Figure 8.2(b) the vacuum level is continuous and the electron
affinity is constant. In the case that the gap between the metal and the
semiconductor becomes zero (Figure 8.2[c]), an abrupt discontinuity of EC
exists at the metal-semiconductor interface. The magnitude of this discon-
tinuity is called the Schottky-barrier height (qΦB), which is expressed as
The work done on the electron in the course of its transfer from the
point x to infinity is given as
( )
∞
W ( x) = ∫ x
Fdx = −q2 / 16πεr εo x 2
(8.3)
xm = [q/(16πεrεo|E|)]0.5 (8.5)
under the condition dEp/dx = 0. qΦB is thus reduced from the value at x = 0
[(8.1)] by ΔqΦB, which is given by
and
JD = (q2DnNC/kT){[2q(ΦB−Φn−VF)ND]/εrεo}0.5
× exp(−qΦB/kT) [exp(qVF/kT)−1] (8.8)
where a = 1.5 in the case of n-type GaN under Emax of 60 kV/cm [9]. Equa-
tion (8.8) then becomes
When Emax is 60 kV/cm, μn is 345 and 164 cm2/Vs (Figure 8.3), respec-
tively, for n-type GaN and 4H-SiC. These high-field μn values are much
lower than low-field μnGaN of 1,000 cm2/Vs and μn4H-SiC of 1,140 cm2/Vs
[10]. This condition means that collisions of electrons with the lattice (i.e.,
GaN
1.5
1.0
silicon 4H-SiC
0.5
0
00 4 10 20 30 40 50 60
10 20 30 40 50 60
Electric-field strength (kV/cm)
λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ
qφ B Electron
EC
x
xm WDn
EV
Figure 8.4 Schematic band diagram of a forward-biased GaN or 4H-SiC Schottky junc-
tion. λ denotes electron mean free path.
JD = qnμnE+qDn(∂n/∂x) (8.12)
across the depletion region near the Schottky junction. If the potential is
denoted as Φ,
E = −∂Φ/∂x (8.13)
Dn = (kT/q) μn (8.14)
JD = qDn[−(qn/kT)(∂Φ/∂x)+∂n/∂x] (8.15)
WDn
exp ( −qΦ / kT ) dx = qDn ⎡⎣n exp ( −qΦ / kT )⎤⎦
WDn
JD ∫
0 0
(8.16)
and
(8.18)
and
vR = (A*T2/2q)(2πmnkT/h2)−1.5 (8.22b)
0 (8.22c)
and
A* = 4πmnk2q/h3, (8.22e)
qφB TFE
FE
Electron
EC
EV
Figure 8.5 Schematic energy-band diagram showing electron tunneling (i.e., FE and
TFE) through a reverse-biased Schottky junction.
As shown in Figure 8.6, kT is lower than E00 when ND > 1015 cm−3 and T
< 15K. At room temperature, on the other hand, kT >> E00 when ND < 1016
cm−3, indicating the dominance of TFE over FE.
Current/voltage characteristics calculated under the assumption of
TFE was reported to agree with the reverse characteristics of 100-µm-
diameter nickel/GaN Schottky-barrier diodes (SBDs) [20]; however, it did
not agree with the reverse characteristics of large (9-mm2) nickel/GaN
SBDs [21]. Moreover, in the case of 4H-SiC SBDs, threading-dislocation
density was reported to influence the measured reverse characteristic; for
example, maximum reverse current density (2 × 10−1 mA/cm2 at 0.6 kV)
of 53 molybdenum/4H-SiC SBDs was four-orders-of-magnitude larger
than minimum reverse current density (2 × 10−5 mA/cm2 at 0.6 kV) [22]
(Figure 8.7). These findings suggest that describing an equation for JTED un-
der the reverse-biased condition with (8.22a) is not much use. Instead, struc-
tures that minimize reverse current (namely, insertion of a wider-bandgap
100
m n = 0.20× 9.1 × 10 −31 kg
εr = 10
Energy (meV)
kT (T = 500K)
E 00
10
kT (T = 300K)
kT (T = 15K)
1
10 15 10 16 10 17
Donor concentration ND (cm-3)
Figure 8.6 Calculated E00 (8.23) versus thermal energy as a function of donor concentra-
tion.
10 1
53 molybdenum/4H-SiC SBDs
N D = 5 ×10 15 cm−3, RT
Reverse current density J R (mA/cm )
2
Maximum J R
10 −1
10 −3
Minimum J R
10 −5
10 −7
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
Reverse voltage VR (kV)
(c) lower E
E C’’
E C’
EC
Anode electrode
Schottky contact
Ohmic contact
n- GaN
n+ GaN substrate Forward-current direction
Cathode electrode
(a)
Anode electrode Anode electrode Anode electrode
n- gradedAlGaN p+
p+ SiC p+ SiC
n- GaN n- n- SiC
n+ GaN substrate n+ substrate n+ SiC substrate
Cathode electrode Cathode electrode Cathode electrode
(b) (c) (d)
Anode electrode Anode electrode Anode electrode
p+ GaN p+ GaN p+ GaN p+ GaN
p+ SiC p+ SiC
Figure 8.9 Cross-sectional schematic illustrations of active regions of SBDs: (a) pure SBD,
(b) SBD with a wider-bandgap layer, (c) SBD with a thin p+-type layer, (d) trench SBD with a
thin p+-type region, (e, f) GaN merged p-n Schottky (MPS) diode, and (g) 4H-SiC junction-
barrier Schottky (JBS) diode.
edge termination [21] (see Chapter 11). As shown in Figure 8.10(a), VF was
1.30V for a typical limit on power dissipation of a semiconductor package
(PP = 300 W/cm2 [30]).
With increasing temperature, μn decreases as a result of phonon scat-
tering. Dependence of qΦB on temperature (348–573K) was analyzed by
fitting measured IF/VF characteristics of a nickel/n-GaN pure SBD on the
basis of the TED model [12].
200
100
9-mm2 0.79-kV
pure GaN SBD
0
0.5 1 1.30 1.5 2
Forward voltage VF (V)
(a)
Forward current density JF (A/cm2)
400
300 W/cm2
300
200
100
8-mm2 1.7-kV
pure 4H-SiC SBD
0
0.5 1 1.401.5 2
Forward voltage VF (V)
(b)
Forward current density JF (A/cm2)
400
300 W/cm2
300
200
100
0.64-mm2 0.4-kV
gradedAlGaN SBD
0 1.401.5
0.5 1 2
Forward voltage VF (V)
(c)
b = [ap−(WDn−x)n]/p (8.26)
N D−N A
n
x
a
WDn
E max
b a x
WDn
EC
qΔφB
qφB
x
ba WDn
Figure 8.11 Distributions of (a) idealized profile of net donor concentration, (b) electric
field, and (c) conduction-band minimum.
Anode
Anode electrode electrode
0 0
> 1.5 MV/cm
Depth ( μm)
Depth ( μm)
2 2
> 1.5 MV/cm
4 4
−2 0 2 −2 0 2
Lateral dimension ( μm) Lateral dimension ( μm)
(a) (b)
Figure 8.12 Simulated distributions of regions where electric-field strength exceeds 1.5
MV/cm in 0.6-kV reverse-biased (a) planar and (b) trench SBDs with a thin p+-type layer
[43].
00
0.5 1 1.03 1.30 1.5 2
0.5 1 1.5 2
Forward voltageVF (V)
(a)
1.E −2
10-02
Reverse current density JR (A/cm2)
−3
10-03
1.E
× 5.9
−4
10-04
1.E
Figure 8.13 Room-temperature (a) forward and (b) reverse current-density/voltage char-
acteristics of the reported 0.7-kV-class 4H-SiC trench SBD with a thin p+-type layer [43] and
pure SBD [21].
diodes when VF < Eg/q (Figure 8.9[e, g], respectively). In contrast, forward
current also flows through the p-n junctions of MPS diodes when VF > Eg/q
(Figure 8.9[f]).
The electron-hole recombination energy is known to be used often for
creating defects [44] (see Section 12.6). Since the stacking-fault energy of
4H-SiC (0.014 J/m2 [45]) is much smaller than that of GaN (1.2 J/m2 [46])
(Section 2.2.3), a JBS diode is preferred to an MPS diode in the case of
4H-SiC diodes. With respect to shielded GaN SBDs, on the other hand, MPS
diodes, in which p+-type regions exist in the active area, are preferred be-
cause using magnesium-ion implantation in the edge-termination area is
difficult.
9
2
SBD
3
0
0.8 3 6 9
Forward voltageVF (V)
(a)
Reverse current density JR (A/cm )
40
2
20
10
Figure 8.14 Room-temperature (a) forward and (b) reverse current-density/voltage char-
acteristics of reported 0.01-mm2 GaN MPS diode [47].
150
1.8-mm2 4H-SiC diodes Fitted SBD
with uniform mobility
3 × 10 15 cm-3/22 μm
drift layer
100 qφB = 1.59 eV
room temperature JBS diode fitted
with uniform
mobility JBS diode fitted
with degraded mobility
50
50 in surface region
0
1 2 3
Forward voltage VF(V)
8.11 Summary
The first half of this chapter explains the physics of metal-semiconductor
contacts, including Schottky-barrier lowering, as well as the current-trans-
port theories based on diffusion and thermionic-emission diffusion. Com-
pared to conventional pure SBDs, SBDs with structures with a thin p+-type
or wider-bandgap layer and/or with a reduced electric field are better ap-
proaches from the viewpoint of decreasing reverse leakage. The second half
of this chapter introduces graded AlGaN SBDs, 4H-SiC trench SBDs with a
thin p+-type region, GaN MPS diodes, and 4H-SiC JBS diodes, in addition to
pure GaN and 4H-SiC SBDs.
References
[25] Zhou, Y., et al., “High Breakdown Voltage Schottky Rectifier Fabricated on
Bulk n-GaN Substrate,” Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 50, No. 11–12, 2006, pp.
1744–1747.
[26] Zhou, Y., et al., “Temperature-Dependent Electrical Characteristics of Bulk
n-GaN Schottky Rectifier,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 101, 2007, pp.
024506-1–024506-4.
[27] Ozbeck, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Planar Nearly Ideal Edge Termination Tech-
nique for GaN Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011, pp.
300–302.
[28] Ozbeck, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Finite-Zone Argon Implant Edge-Termina-
tion for High-Voltage GaN Schottky Rectifiers,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol.
32, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1361–1363.
[29] Saitoh, Y., et al., “Extremely Low On-Resistance and High Breakdown Voltage
Observed in Vertical GaN Schottky Barrier Diodes with High-Mobility Drift
Layers on Low-Dislocation-Density GaN Substrates,” Applied Physics Express,
Vol. 3, 2010, pp. 081001-1–081001-3.
[30] Zhang, Q., et al., “12-kV p-Channel IGBTs with Low On-Resistance in 4H-
SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1027–1029.
[31] Bhatnagar, M, P. K. McLarty, and B. J. Baliga, “Silicon Carbide High Voltage
(400 V) Schottky Barrier Diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 13, No. 10,
1992, 501–503.
[32] Alok, D., B. J. Baliga, and P. K. McLarty, “A Simple Edge Termination for Sili-
con Carbide with Nearly Ideal Breakdown Voltage,” IEEE Electron Device Letters,
Vol. 15, No. 10, 1994, pp. 394–395.
[33] Miura, N., et al., “4H-SiC Power Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Field Effect
Transistors and Schottky Barrier Diodes of 1.7 kV Rating,” Japanese Journal of
Applied Physics, Vol. 48, 2009, pp. 04C085-1–04C085-4.
[34] Hontz, M. R., et al., “Modeling and Characterization of Vertical GaN Schottky
Diodes with AlGaN Cap Layers,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 64,
No. 5, 2017, pp. 2172–2178.
[35] Chilukuri, R. K., and B. J. Baliga, “High Voltage Ni/4H-SiC Schottky Recti-
fiers,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Toronto,
May 26–28, 1999, pp. 161–164.
[36] McGlothlin, H. M., et al., “4 kV Silicon Carbide Schottky Diodes for High Fre-
quency Switching Applications,” IEEE Device Research Conference, Santa Bar-
bara, June 28–30, 1999, pp. 42–43.
[37] Singh, R., et al., “SiC Power Schottky and PiN Diodes,” IEEE Transactions on
Electron Devices, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2002, pp. 665–672.
[38] Nakamura, T., et al., “A 4.15 kV 9.07 mΩ-cm2 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diode
Using Mo Contact Annealed at High Temperature,” IEEE Electron Device Letters,
Vol. 26, No. 2, 2005, pp. 99–101.
[39] Mochizuki, K., et al., “Analysis of Leakage Current at Pd/AlGaN Schottky Bar-
riers Formed on GaN Freestanding Substrates,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 4,
No. 2, 2011, pp. 024104-1–024104-3.
[40] Ploog, K. H., and O. Brandt, “Doping of Group III Nitrides,” Journal of Vacuum
Science and Technology A, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1997, pp. 1609–1614.
[41] Ptak, A. J., et al., “Controlled Oxygen Doping of GaN Using Plasma Assisted
Molecular-Beam Epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 79, No. 17, 2001, pp.
2740–2742.
[42] Hasegawa, H., and S. Oyama, “Mechanism of Anomalous Current Transport
in n -Type GaN Schottky Contacts,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B,
Vol. 20, No. 4, 2002, pp. 1647–1655.
[43] Nakamura, T., et al., “High Performance SiC Trench Devices with Ultra-low
Ron,” International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., Dec. 5–7, 2011,
pp. 599–601.
[44] Kimmering, L. C., “Recombination Enhanced Defect Reactions,” Solid-State
Electronics, Vol. 21, 1978, pp. 1391–1401.
[45] Hong, M. H., et al., “Stacking Fault Energy of 6H-SiC and 4H-SiC Single Crys-
tals,” Phylosophical Magazine A, Vol. 80, No. 4, 2000, pp. 919–935.
[46] Stampfl, C., and C. G. Van de Walle, “Energetics and Electronic Structure of
Stacking Faults in AlN, GaN, and InN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 57, No. 24, 1998,
pp. R15052–R15055.
[47] Kajitani, R., et al., “A High Current Operation in a 1.6 kV GaN-Based Trenched
Junction Barrier Schottky Diode,” Solid State Devices and Materials, Sapporo,
Sept. 27–30, 2015, pp. 1056–1057.
[48] Baliga, B. J., “The Pinch Rectifier: A Low Forward Drop High Speed Power
Diode,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1984, pp. 843–843.
[49] Held, R., N. Kaminski, and E. Niemann., “SiC Merged p-n/Schottky Rectifiers
for High Voltage Applications,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 264–268, 1998, pp.
1057–1060.
[50] Dahlquist, F., et al., “Junction Barrier Schottky Diodes in 4H-SiC and 6H-SiC,”
Materials Science Forum, Vol. 264–268, 1998, pp. 1061–1064.
[51] Dahlquist, F., et al., “A 2.8 kV JBS Diode with Low Leakage,” Materials Science
Forum, Vol. 338–342, 2000, pp. 1179–1182.
[52] Wu, J., et al., “4,308 V, 20.09 mΩcm2 4H-SiC MPS Diodes Based on a 30 Mi-
cron Drift Layer,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 457–460, 2004, pp. 1109–1112.
[53] Hull, B. A., et al., “Performance and Stability of Large Area 4H-SiC 10-kV
Junction Barrier Schottky Rectifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol.
55, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1864–1870.
[54] Baliga, B. J., “Analysis of Junction-Barrier-Controlled Schottky (JBS) Rectifier
Characteristics,” Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 28, No. 11, 1985, pp. 1089–1093.
[55] Zhu, L., and T. P. Chow, “Analytical Modeling of High-Voltage 4H-SiC Junc-
tion Barrier Schottky (JBS) Rectifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 55, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1857–1863.
[56] Negoro, Y., T. Kimoto, and H. Matsunami, “Carrier Concentration Near Tail
Region in Aluminum- or Boron-Implanted 4H-SiC (0001),” Journal of Applied
Physics, Vol. 98, No. 4, 2005, pp. 043709-1–043709-7.
9
Contents
Metal-Insulator-Semi-
9.1 Introduction
conductor Capacitors
9.2 MIS Capacitors
and Unipolar Power-
9.3 AlGaN/GaN
Heterostructures
Switching Devices
9.4 Band Lineup for
GaN, AlN, 4H-SiC, and
Representative Insulators
9.1 Introduction
9.5 GaN HFETs
As described in Section 7.5.2, SiC can be ther-
9.6 4H-SiC JFETs mally oxidized in the same manner as silicon,
except for the simultaneous production of CO.
9.7 MISFETS On the other hand, a deposited SiNx or Al2O3
layer is frequently used as an insulator on GaN
9.8 Summary and AlGaN (see Section 7.5.1). Therefore, in
this chapter, MIS is used for GaN and SiC and
metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) is used for
silicon only.
Unipolar power-switching devices include
the MISFET and the static-induction transistor
(SIT) [1], which consists of a p-n-junction-gate
SIT (also called a junction field-effect transis-
tor [JFET]), a Schottky-junction-gate SIT (also
called a metal-semiconductor field-effect tran-
sistor [MESFET]), and a p+-gate SIT (also called
169
J D (A/cm2)
R on A (mΩcm2) R on A (mΩcm2)
(a) (b)
Eg
qφ ms = qφ m−qX− −q ψF
2
vacuum level
qXi
qφ m qX
EC EC
qψ F
q φms Ei Ei
EF EF
d EV EV
(a) (b)
EC qψS < 0
qφ ms < 0 Ei
EC
EF qV < 0
EV qψF
Ei
EF
EV
(c)
(d)
WDp
(e) (f)
Figure 9.2 Energy-band diagrams of a metal, insulator, and p-type semiconductor when
the metal work function is lower than the semiconductor work function: (a) separated, (b)
connected with zero bias, and (c) connected with flat-band bias and the bias conditions of
(d) accumulation, (e) depletion, and (f) inversion.
and conduction-band minimum EC. Since the intrinsic Fermi level Ei, which
is the Fermi level of an intrinsic semiconductor, lies in the middle of band-
gap Eg, the work function of the p-type semiconductor, qΦs, is expressed as
where ΨF is the Fermi potential defined as the difference between Ei/q and
EF/q and can be calculated from ionized acceptor concentration NA- and
intrinsic carrier concentration ni (see Section 2.4) as [4]
When the metal work function, qΦm, is lower than qΦs, the energy
bands bend downward [Figure 9.2(b)]. Since the difference between the
work functions of a metal and a p-type semiconductor, qΦms, is given as
a result, WDp and total potential drop across the depletion region (2 F) are
relatively constant.
EI = −QI/εIεo (9.6)
Charge
QI
QI = −Qm−QD
d WDp
x
O xI QD
Qm
(a)
Electric field
x
O xI d WDp
(b)
Figure 9.3 Schematic illustrations for analyzing the effect of an insulator-charge density
QI on MIS structure. (a) Charge configuration at zero bias (QI = −Qm − QD) and (b) electric-
field distribution at zero bias.
CI = εIεo/d (9.8)
0 (9.10)
0 (9.11)
P SP AlGaN P SP GaN
P PE AlGaN
EC
(0001) ΔE C
surface E SD EF
AlGaN GaN
(a)
+qNSD + +σAlGaN
+σGaN
−σGaN
−σ2DEG
−σAlGaN
(b)
Figure 9.4 Distribution of (a) conduction-band edge and (b) interface charges of a typi-
cal AlGaN/GaN heterostructure formed on GaN (0001). (PSP: spontaneous polarization; PPE:
piezoelectric polarization.)
2.5 eV
ΔE C = 1.9 eV 2.1 eV
1.2 eV 1.1 eV
0.2 eV
AlN
GaN SiN x Al2O3 4H-SiC
3.4 eV HfO2 SiO 2 3.2 eV
0.0 eV
ΔE V = 0.3 eV 0.8 eV
1.6 eV 1.6 eV
3.2 eV
Figure 9.5 Band lineup for GaN, AlN, 4H-SiC, and representative insulators [10−14].
Gate 2DEG
Source Insulator Source
AlGaN
n+-GaN n+-GaN
GaN GaN
AlN Electron - AlN
p+-GaN current flow p+-GaN
n-GaN
n+-GaN substrate
Drain
Figure 9.6 Schematic cross-sectional view of the first vertical GaN MIS HFET on a free-
standing GaN substrate [25].
n-GaN drift layer as long as all the doped magnesium and silicon atoms
became, respectively, acceptors and donors. Breakdown voltage BV (Figure
9.1) can then be determined as the voltage at which the maximum electric
field at the p+/n GaN junction (Emax in Section 3.5) equals the critical elec-
tric field (Ecritical in Section 2.6). However, BV was not reported in [25].
The process flow for forming the aperture in Figure 9.6 is shown in
Figure 9.7. A 3-μm-thick n-GaN layer, a 0.1-μm-thick p+-GaN layer, a
10-nm-thick AlN layer, and a 50-nm-thick GaN layer were grown on an
n+-GaN (0001) substrate by MOCVD (see Section 6.2) (Figure 9.7[a]). The
GaN/AlN/p+-GaN layer was dry-etched by ICP dry etching with Cl2 gas and
an SiO2 mask (see Section 7.2.1) (Figure 9.7[b]). After the mask was re-
moved, a 0.3-μm-thick n-GaN layer (Si: 1 × 1016 cm−3) and a 15-nm-thick
Al0.25Ga0.75N layer were grown by MOCVD (Figure 9.7[c]). Here, the AlN
layer was used to suppress mass transport from the surface to the aperture
region [26].
Silicon-ion implantation was used to form n+-GaN source regions (see
Section 7.3.1). As a gate insulator and an electrode, a 50-nm-thick high-
temperature SiO2 layer and a 250-nm-thick phosphorous-doped polycrys-
talline silicon film were deposited by low-pressure chemical vapor deposi-
tion. Annealing to activate the polycrystalline silicon (at 850°C for 20 min)
also activated hydrogenated magnesium [27]. It should be noted here that
magnesium in the p+-GaN on which n-GaN is grown is not fully dehydro-
genated by activation annealing [28]; therefore, ammonia-molecular beam
epitaxy, instead of MOCVD, was recently used to fabricate GaN MIS HFETs
without activation annealing [29].
In [25], the source and drain electrodes made of titanium (20 nm)/alu-
minum (1 μm) were formed by electron-beam evaporation. The GaN MIS
SiO2
GaN
AlN
p+-GaN
n-GaN
n +-GaN substrate
(a)
SiO2
GaN
AlN
p+-GaN
n-GaN
n +-GaN substrate
(b)
AlGaN
GaN n-GaN GaN
AlN AlN
p+-GaN p+-GaN
n-GaN
n +-GaN substrate
(c)
Figure 9.7 Process flow for fabricating the aperture shown in Figure 9.6 [25].
L ch WJFET
PP/2
Gate
Source Insulator Source
AlGaN n +-GaN
R SA
R chA R accmA GaN
AlN
t p++WDn p+-GaN
Depletion region R JFET A Depletion region
45 o
t drift−tW
drift
Dn
Rdrift A
Rsub A
drain
Figure 9.8 Specific resistances in the current flow path of the vertical GaN MIS HFET
shown in Figure 9.6.
where Lch is channel length and P is cell pitch (Figure 9.8). RchA can be ap-
proximated as
where the factor 0.6 is typically used for vertical silicon power-switching
devices to account for two-dimensional current spreading from the channel
into the JFET region [30]. RJFETA, RdriftA, and RsubA are expressed as
RdriftA = ρdrift{[(P/2)ln[(P/2)/(WJFET−WDn)]
+ tdrift−WDn−[(P/2)−WJFET]} (9.17)
where ρdrift is resistivity of the drift region, ρsub is resistivity of the substrate,
tsub is thickness of the substrate, and depleted n-GaN width WDn is already
given as (3.30); namely,
In the case P/2 = WJFET + 4 μm, RonA of the vertical GaN MIS HFET at
300K is calculated as a function of WJFET (Figure 9.9). In [25], Lch = 2 μm
and WJFET = 1.5 μm. Other parameters used to calculate the curves in Figure
9.9 are listed as follows: ρ2DEGGaN(0001) = 580 Ω/sq (Section 9.3); μn = 850
cm2/Vs (Figure 2.16); εr = 10.4 [32]; ρsub = 0.018 Ωcm and tsub = 600 μm
[33]. Calculated RonA reaches a minimum of 1.7 mΩcm2 at WFET = 3.5 μm.
RaccumA increases with WJTEF when WJFET < 3.5 μm, while contributions of
RdriftA and RJFETA become large when WJFET > 3.5 μm. Since the contribu-
tion of RsubA (i.e., 1.1 mΩcm2) is dominant, in the present case of a 3-μm-
thick 1 × 1016-cm−3 doped n-GaN drift layer, thinning GaN substrates is
effective for reducing RonA.
Note that in contrast to the above-described epitaxially grown p+-type
GaN buried regions [25], magnesium-ion-implanted p+-type GaN buried
regions have also been used [34]. Activation annealing was carried out at
1,553K in NH3+N2 ambient, and the resultant BV and RonA were 250V and
2.2 mΩcm2, respectively.
3.0
2.5
2.0 RonA
1.7
1.5
RsubA
1.0
0.5 RaccumA
Rdrift A
RchA
RJFETA
0 2 3.5 4 6 8 10
JFET width WFET (μm)
Figure 9.9 Specific resistance of a vertical GaN MIS HFET (Figure 9.6) as a function of
JFET width calculated from (9.13) to (9.21) in the case P/2 = WJFET + 4 μm.
Spontaneous polarization
[1120]
[0001]
[1100]
Gate
AlGaN
GaN/n+-GaN 2DEG
Source Source
p +-GaN
n -GaN
n +-GaN substrate
Drain
(0001)
surface
EC
(0001)
surface E SD EF
Gate
Source p+-GaN Source
n +-GaN AlGaN n +-GaN
2DEG
p+-GaN p+-GaN
n-GaN
n +-GaN substrate
Drain
(a)
Gate
p+-GaN
AlGaN
GaN 2DEG
Source C-dopedGaN AlGaN Source
p+-GaN
n-GaN
n +-GaN substrate
Drain
(b)
Figure 9.13 Schematic cross-sectional views of (a) planar [35] and (b) V-grooved [36]
GaN p+-gate HFETs on freestanding GaN substrates.
0 30 60 90
Surface tilt-angle from (0001) (deg)
Source
n+
Channel
Gate Gate
n - drift layer
n + substrate
Drain
(a)
Gate
p+ top gate
Source Source
n+ Channel n+
n - drift layer
n + substrate
Drain
(b)
Figure 9.15 Schematic cross-sectional views of 4H-SiC JFETs with (a) trenched-and-
implanted channels and (b) p+ buried gates.
9.7 MISFETs
A MISFET is an FET that includes a MIS capacitor, a drift layer, and source
and drain regions. The gate structure in the MIS capacitor is divided into
planar and trench types, while the drift-layer structure is divided into con-
ventional n- and SJ types. Figure 9.17(a–c) shows schematic cross-sectional
views of planar, trench, and SJ MISFETs. Planar Si MOSFETs were the first
unipolar power-switching devices to be commercially successful. To reduce
fabrication cost, channels in these devices were formed by the so-called
double-diffusion process; namely, the difference between lateral diffusivi-
ties of p- and n-type dopants defines the channels. In the cases of GaN and
Drain
Normally-on
4H-SiC JFET
Gate
Normally-off
silicon MOSFET
Source
Figure 9.16 A high-voltage normally-on 4H-SiC JFET cascoded with a low-voltage
normally-off silicon MOSFET.
Gate Gate
Source Source Source
Insulator Insulator
n+ n+ n+ n+
p-base p-base p-base
n-drift region
n + substrate
Drain
(a)
n+ n+ n+ n+
Gate gate
Gate
p-base p-base p-base
Insulator Insulator
n-drift region
n + substrate
Drain
(b)
P
Source
Gate Gate Source
Source
Insulator Insulator
n+ n+ n+ n+
p-base p-base p-base
p n-drift region
p ≈tdrift (N A) (N D)
p
Wn Wp
n + substrate
Drain
(c)
Figure 9.17 Schematic cross-sectional views of (a) planar, (b) trench, and (c) SJ MISFETs.
Gate
Source insulator Source
inversion
layer accumulation layer
n+ n+
p-base p-base
Depletion region Depletion region
45 o
n-drift region
n + substrate
Drain
(a)
L ch WJFET
L access P /2
Gate
Source insulator Source
inversion
layer accumulation layer
R SA R ch A R accmA n+
n + substrate R subA
Drain
(b)
Figure 9.18 (a) Current-flow path of a planar 4H-SiC MISFET without a CSL and (b) spe-
cific resistances in the current flow path of a planar 4H-SiC MISFET with a CSL.
CI = εI/tI (9.24)
RaccumA is given as
where μaccum is electron mobility in the accumulation layer. Here, the factor
of 0.6, which already appeared in (9.15), is typically used for vertical silicon
power-switching devices to account for two-dimensional current spread-
ing from the channel into the JFET region [30]. And WDn is obtained using
(2.7b),
and (9.19) and (9.20). RJFETA and RdriftA can be approximated, respectively,
as
and
where ρCSL and tCSL are resistivity and thickness of the CSL. RsubA is given
by (9.18).
In the case of the double-self-aligned short-channel 4H-SiC planar
1-kV-class MISFET reported in [64], Lch = 0.5 μm; P/2 = 4 μm; tI = 50 nm;
WJFET = 0.5 μm; NCSL = 1.0 × 1017 cm−3; tCSL = 0.9 μm; Ndrift = 8.55 × 1015
cm−3; and tdrift = 8.4 μm, and VGS−Vth = 20V. With the assumption of μaccum
= μinv, μCSL = 600 cm2/Vs, μdrift = 850 cm2/Vs (Figure 2.16), ρdrift = 0.02 Ωcm
[65], and tdrift = 350 μm [65], RonA at 300K is calculated as a function of μinv
(Figure 9.19). RJFETA is negligibly small due to the use of a CSL. Although
μinv was not described in [64], the result in Figure 9.19 indicates that in the
case of 4H-SiC planar 1-kV-class MISFETs, the measured RonA of 6.7 mΩcm2
[64] should decrease with increasing μch.
With respect to higher-voltage 4H-SiC planar MISFETs, typical thick-
ness/donor concentration in drift layers for BV of 1.7, 3.3, and 4.5 kV are,
respectively, 15 μm/2 × 1015 cm−3, 34 μm/1.5 × 1015 cm−3, and 40 μm/1
× 1015 cm−3 [66]. Under the assumption of μdrift of 850 cm2/Vs (Figure
2.16) for the three doping levels, RonA’s at 300K are calculated as a func-
tion of μinv (Figure 9.20). Since RdriftA dominates RonA in such high-voltage
MISFETs, decreasing μinv is not so important in terms of reducing RonA.
10
Ron A
Rdrift A Rsub(mu1cm2)
RsubA A
8
Specific resistance (mΩcm2)
Wang and Cooper [64]
6
Rch A
4
Raccum A
2
RJFET A
0
1 10 100
Inversion-layer channel mobility (cm2/Vs)
Figure 9.19 Specific resistance of a 4H-SiC planar 1-kV-class MISFET with a CSL (Figure
9.16[b]) as a function of inversion-layer channel mobility calculated from (9.18) to (9.20)
and (9.22) to (9.28).
35
R on A of 4.5-kV-class 4H-SiC planar MISFET
30
Specific resitance (mΩcm2)
25
15
10
R ch A
0
1 10 100
Inversion layer channel mobility (cm2/ Vs)
Figure 9.20 Specific resistance of 4H-SiC planar 1.7−4.5-kV-class MISFETs with a CSL
(Figure 9.18[b]) as a function of inversion-layer channel mobility calculated from (9.18) to
(9.20) and (9.22) to (9.28).
Specific on-resistance
(mΩcm2) 9.3 − 12.1 1.8 2.7
Specific on-resistance
(mΩcm2) 2.6 2.2 0.36 0.2
Figure 9.21 Reported values of BV and RonA of GaN trench MISFETs on freestanding
substrates [68–76].
Gate
Source
10 μm
Figure 9.22 Schematic plan view of a regular hexagonal-trench gate layout [71, 72].
kV [67]), a very strong electric field developed across the gate insulator lim-
ited BV of 4H-SiC trench MISFETs.
Even in the case of silicon-trench MOSFETs, a strong electric field is
developed in the gate oxide at the bottom corner of the silicon trench [79];
however, the electric field in the underlying semiconductor (ES) is weak,
0.3 MV/cm [80]. On the other hand, Es becomes high, namely, 3.75 MV/cm
[81] for GaN and 2.50 MV/cm for 4H-SiC [82] (see Section 2.6). According
to Gauss’s law, the electric field in a gate insulator (EI) is related to ES as
follows:
EI = (εr/εI)ES (9.29)
n+ n+ n+ n+
Gate gate
Gate
p-base p-base p-base
Insulator p+ Insulator
shielding
region
n-drift region
n + substrate
Drain
(a)
n+ n+ n+ n+
Gate gate
Gate
p- base
Insulator p+ Insulator
shielding
region
n-drift region
n + substrate
Drain
(b)
n+ Gate n+ n+ Gate n+
p-base p-base p-base
Insulator Insulator
p+ p+
shielding shielding
region region
n-drift region
n + substrate
Drain
(c)
Figure 9.23 Schematic cross-sectional views of p+ shielded (a) single-trench [79], (b)
double-trench [88], and (c) V-groove trench MISFETs [90].
8.5 × 1014 cm−3 [86] and 5 kV for a 115-μm-thick drift layer doped at
7.5 × 1014 cm−3 [87]. However, reported RonA values of these 4H-SiC trench
MISFETs were relatively large: 18 [67], 180 [77], 311 [78], 120 [86], and
228 mΩcm2 [87].
In 2011, 4H-SiC MISFETs with source and gate trenches (so-called
double trenches [Figure 9.23(b)]) were reported with very low RonA: 0.79
mΩcm2 for BV = 630V (Ndrift = 1.8 × 1016 cm−3; tdrift = 5 μm) and 1.41 mΩcm2
for BV = 1260V (Ndrift = 7.5 × 1015 cm−3; tdrift = 8 μm) [88]. As described in
Section 8.8, such a double-trench structure is also effective for reducing the
electric field in trench SBDs. It has to be noted that tsub was thinned down to
100 μm in [88]. Measured μinv on the trench sidewalls of the double-trench
MISFETs was relatively small (i.e., 11 cm2/Vs) [88]. According to Harada et
al. [89], the deep p+ regions create a JFET under the trench with a poten-
tial barrier that reduces the electric field at the bottom of the trenches, and
EI can be reduced to less than 3 MV/cm if the deep p+ regions are formed
1.2 μm deeper than the bottom of the gate trench.
9.7.3 SJ MISFETs
According to Gauss’s Law, BV for a given SJ drift layer (Figure 9.17[c])
reaches a maximum when the sheet charge in each n-or p-type column Qs
is given as
putting (9.30) and (9.32) into (9.31) leads to the following expression:
9.8 Summary
This chapter starts by reviewing the physics of MIS capacitors and AlGaN/
GaN heterostructures to provide an understanding of MISFET and HFET
operations. Detailed analysis of RonA is carried out by taking a reported GaN
MIS HFET and a 4H-SiC planar MISFET as examples. The chapter also intro-
duces reported device performances of GaN MESFETs, GaN p+-gate HFETs,
GaN trench MISFETs, 4H-SiC trench MISFETs, and 4H-SiC V-groove MIS-
FETs. Finally, with respect to SJ MISFETs, the chapter describes the concept
of charge balance and introduces the very recently reported device perfor-
mance of 4H-SiC V-groove SJ MISFETs.
References
[1] Nishizawa, J., T. Terasaki, and J. Shibata, “Field Effect Transistor Versus
Analog Transistor (Static Induction Transistor),” IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1975, pp. 185–197.
[2] Friedrichs, P., et al., “Static and Dynamic Characteristics of 4H-SiC JFETs
Designed for Different Blocking Categories,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 338–
342, 2000, pp. 1243–1246.
[3] Okada, M., et al., “Novel vertical Heterojunction Field-Effect Transistors with
Regrown AlGaN/GaN Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Channels on GaN Sub-
strates,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2010, pp. 054201-1–054201-3.
[4] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology,
Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, p. 249 and pp. 312−315.
[5] Muller, R. S., and T. I. Kamins, Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits (Second
Edition), Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 1986, pp.398−402.
[6] Ambacher, O., et al., “Two-Dimensional Electron Gases Induced by Spontane-
ous and Piezoelectric Polarization Charges in Ni- and Ga-face AlGaN/GaN het-
erostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 85, No. 6, 1999, pp. 3222–3233.
[7] Ploog, K. H., and O. Brandt, “Doping of Group III Nitrides,” Journal of Vacuum
Science and Technology A, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1997, pp. 1609–1614.
[8] Ptak, A. J., et al., “Controlled Oxygen Doping of GaN Using Plasma Assist-
ed Molecular-Beam Epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 79, No. 17, 2001,
pp. 2740–2742.
[9] Handa, H., et al., “High-Speed Switching and Current-Collapse-Free Opera-
tion by GaN Gate Injection Transistors with Thick GaN Buffer on Bulk GaN
[24] Kim, K.-H., N.-W. Kwak, and S. H. Lee, “Fabrication and Properties of AlN
Film on GaN Substrate by Using Remote Plasma Atomic Layer Deposition
Method,” Electronic Materials Letters, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2009, pp. 83–86.
[25] Kanechika, M., et al., “A Vertical Insulated Gate AlGaN/GaN Heterojunction
Field-Effect Transistor,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 46, No. 20–24,
2007, pp. L503–L505.
[26] Nitta, S., et al., “In-Plane GaN/AlGaN Heterostructure Fabricated by Selective
Mass Transport Planar Technology,” Materials Science and Engineering B, Vol. 93,
No. 1–3, 2002, pp. 139–142.
[27] Nakamura, S., et al., “Thermal Annealing Effects on p-Type Mg-Doped GaN
Films,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 31, No. 2B, 1992, pp. L139–L142.
[28] Hurni, C. A., et al., “p-n Junctions on Ga-face GaN Grown by NH3 Molecular
Beam Epitaxy with Low Ideality Factors and Low Reverse Currents,” Applied
Physics Letters, Vol. 97, 2010, pp. 222113-1–222113-3.
[29] Yeluri, R., et al., “Design, Fabrication, and Performance Analysis of GaN Ver-
tical Electron Transistors with a Buried p/n Junction,” Applied Physics Letters,
Vol. 106, 2015, pp. 183502-1–183502-5.
[30] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, p. 294 and p. 393.
[31] Sze, S. M., and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Third Edition), New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, p. 81.
[32] Barker, Jr., A. S., and M. Ilegems, “Infrared Lattice Vibrations and Free-Elec-
tron Dispersion in GaN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1973, pp. 743–750.
[33] Yoshida, T., et al., “Preparation of 3-inch Freestanding GaN Substrates by Hy-
dride Vapor Phase Epitaxy with Void Assisted Separation,” Physica Status Solidi
A, Vol. 205, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1053–1055.
[34] Chowdhury, S., et al., “CAVET on Bulk GaN Substrates Achieved with MBE-
grown AlGaN/GaN Layers to Suppress Dispersion,” IEEE Electron Device Letters,
Vol. 33, No. 1, 2012, pp. 61–63.
[35] Nie, H., et al., “1.5-kV and 2.2-mΩ-cm2 Vertical GaN Transistors on Bulk-GaN
Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2014, pp. 939–941.
[36] Shibata, D., et al., “1.7 kV/1.0 mΩcm2 Normally-Off Vertical GaN Transistor
on GaN Substrate with Regrown p-GaN/AlGaN/GaN Gate Structure,” Interna-
tional Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec. 5–7, 2016, pp. 248–251.
[37] Zhao, J., et al., “3.6 mΩcm2, 1726-V 4H-SiC Normally-Off Trenched-and-Im-
planted Vertical JFETs,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices
and ICs, Cambridge, April 14–17, 2003, pp. 50–53.
[38] Zhao, J., et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of 11-kV Normally-Off 4H-
SiC Trenched-and-Implanted Vertical Junction FETs,” IEEE Electron Device Let-
ters, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2004, pp. 474–476.
[39] Ishikawa, T., et al., “SiC Power Devices for HEV/EV and a Novel SiC Vertical
JFET,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec. 15–17, 2014,
pp. 24–27.
[40] Tanaka, Y., et al., “700-V 1.0-mΩcm2 Buried Gate SiC-SIT (SiC-BGSIT),” IEEE
Electron Device Letters, Vol. 27, No. 11, 2006, pp. 908–910.
[41] Baliga, B. J., “The Future of Power Semiconductor Device Technology,”
Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 89, No. 6, 2001, pp. 822–832.
[42] Shimizu, H., et al., “Static and Switching Characteristics of 3.3 kV
Double Channel-Doped SiC Vertical Junction Field Effect Transistor in
Cascode Configuration,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 54, 2015,
pp. 04DP15-1–04DP15-5.
[43] Ueda, D., H. Takagi, and G. Kano, “A New Vertical Power MOSFET Structure
with Extremely Reduced On-Resistance,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 32, No. 1, 1985, pp. 2–6.
[44] Fujihira, T., “Theory of Semiconductor Superjunction Devices,” Japanese
Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 36, No. 10, 1997, pp. 6254–6262.
[45] Shirota, S., and S. Kaneda, “New Type of Varactor Diode Consisting of
Multilayer p-n Junctions,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 49, No. 12, 1978,
pp. 6012–6019.
[46] Deboy, G., et al., “A New Generation of High Voltage MOSFETs Breaks the
Limit Line of Silicon,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec.
6–9, 1998, pp. 683–685.
[47] Shenoy, J. N., J. A. Cooper, and M. R. Melloch, “High Voltage Double-
Implanted Power MOSFETs in 6H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 18,
No. 3, 1997, pp. 93–95.
[48] Ryu, S.-H., et al., “Design and Process Issues for Silicon Carbide Power Di-
MOSFETs,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 640, 2001,
pp. H4.5.1–H4.5.6.
[49] Ryu, S.-H., et al., “Large-Area (3.3 mm × 3.3 mm) Power MOSFETs in 4H-
SiC,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 389–393, 2002, pp. 1195–1198.
[50] Ryu, S.-H., et al., “Development of 10 kV 4H-SiC Power DMOSFETs,” Materi-
als Science Forum, Vol. 457–460, 2004, pp. 1385–1388.
[51] Tega, N., et al., “Novel Trench-Etched Double-Diffused SiC MOS (TED MOS)
for Overcoming Tradeoff Between RonA and Qgd,” International Symposium on
Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Kowloon, May 10–14, 2015, pp. 81–84.
[52] Yang, X. Y., B. M. Lee, and V. Misra, “High Mobility 4H-SiC MOSFETs Using
Lanthanum Silicate Interface Engineering and ALD Deposited SiO2,” Materials
Science Forum, Vol. 778–780, 2014, pp. 557–561.
[53] Das, M. K., “Recent Advances in (0001) 4H-SiC MOS Device Technology,”
Materials Science Forum, Vol. 457–460, 2004, pp. 1375–1280.
[54] Fiorenza, P., et al., “SiO2/4H-SiC Interface Doping During Post-Deposition An-
nealing of the Oxide in N2O and POCl3,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 103, 2013,
pp. 153508-1–153508-4.
[55] Okamoto, D., et al., “Improved Inversion Channel Mobility in 4H-SiC MOS-
FETs on Si Face Utilizing Phosphorus-Doped Oxide,” IEEE Electron Device
Letters, Vol. 31, No. 7, 2010, pp. 710–712.
[72] Oka, T., et al., “Over 10A Operation with Switching Characteristics of 1.2 kV-
class Vertical GaN-Based Trench MOSFETs on a Bulk GaN Substrate,” Interna-
tional Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Prague, June 12–16,
2016, pp. 459–462.
[73] Gupta, C., et al., “In Situ Oxide, GaN Interlayer-Based Vertical Trench MOS-
FET (OG-FET) on Bulk GaN Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 38,
No. 3, 2017, pp. 353–355.
[74] Gupta, C., et al., “Demonstrating >1.4 kV OG-FET Performance with a Novel
Double Field-Plated Geometry and the Successful Scaling of Large-Area De-
vices,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec. 4–6, 2017, pp.
9.4.1–9.4.4.
[75] Sun, M., et al., “High-Performance GaN Vertical Fin Power Transistors on Bulk
GaN Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2017, pp. 509–512.
[76] Zhang, Y., et al., “1200V GaN Vertical Fin Power Field-Effect Transis-
tors,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec. 4–6, 2017,
pp. 9.2.1–9.2.4.
[77] Agarwal, A. K., et al., “1.1 kV 4H-SiC Power UMOSFETs,” IEEE Electron Device
Letters, Vol. 18, No. 12, 1997, pp. 586–588.
[78] Sugawara, Y., and K. Asano, “1.4 kV 4H-SiC UMOSFET with Low Specific
on Resistance,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs,
Kyoto, June, 3–6, 1998, pp. 119–122.
[79] Baliga, B. J., Fundamentals of Power Semiconductor Devices, New York: Springer
Science, 2008, p. 296.
[80] http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/Si/electric.html#Ionization.
[81] Ozbek, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Planar Nearly Ideal Edge-Termination Tech-
nique for GaN Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011,
pp. 300–302.
[82] Niwa, H, J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, “Impact Ionization Coefficients in 4H-SiC
Toward Ultrahigh-Voltage Power Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 62, No. 10, 2015, pp. 3326–3333.
[83] Barker, Jr., A. S., and M. Ilegems, “Infrared Lattice Vibrations and Free-Elec-
tron Dispersion in GaN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1973, pp. 743–750.
[84] Patrick, L., and W. J. Choyke, “Static Dielectric Constant of SiC,” Physical
Review B, Vol. 2, No.6, 1970, pp. 2255–2256.
[85] Sze, S. M., and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Third Edition), New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, p. 791.
[86] Li, Y., J. A. Cooper, and M. A. Capano, “High Voltage (3 kV) UMOSFETs in 4H-
SiC,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2002, pp. 972–975.
[87] Sui, Y., T. Tsuji, and J. A. Cooper, “On-State Characteristics of SiC Power
UMOSFETs on 115 μm Drift Layers,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 26, No. 4,
2005, pp. 255–257.
[88] Nakamura, T., et al., “High Performance SiC Trench Devices with Ultra-low
Ron,” International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, June 5–7, 2011,
pp. 599–601.
10
Contents
Bipolar Power Diodes
10.1 Introduction
and Power-Switching
10.2 Optimum Design of
a One-Dimensional p-n
Diode
Devices
10.3 GaN p-n Diodes
with a Nonuniformly
Doped Drift Layer 10.1 Introduction
203
is due to the shorter carrier lifetime of GaN; however, effective carrier life-
time (under high-level injection) of GaN is increased by photon recycling
(see Chapter 4), which led to a demonstration of a GaN bipolar power diode
with very high breakdown voltage BV (i.e., 5.0 kV) [3]. Bipolar power diodes
include p-n diodes (Figure 10.1[a]) and p-i-n diodes (Figure 10.1[b]). In ad-
dition, p-n-p-n diodes, called Shockley diodes, (Figure 10.1[c]) have been
developed, although they are functionally two-terminal power-switching
devices. All these diodes adopt a non-self-aligned mesa-type configuration,
as explained in Section 3.7.
With respect to power-switching devices, GaN bipolar ones have not
been reported. Although GaN/InGaN heterojunction bipolar transistors
Anode
p+-anode
Termination Termination
n-drift region
n + substrate
Cathode
(a)
Anode
p+-anode
Termination Termination
i-drift region
n + substrate
Cathode
(b)
Anode
p+-anode
n-base
Termination Termination
p-drift region
n + substrate
Cathode
(c)
Figure 10.1 Schematic cross-sectional views of bipolar power diodes: (a) p-n diode, (b)
p-i-n diode, and (c) Shockley diode (i.e., p-n-p-n diode). Although “i” stands for intrinsic, a
lightly-doped n-type layer is usually used for an i-drift layer in the case of a wide-bandgap
semiconductor p-i-n diode.
Emitter
Base n +-emitter Base
p+ p-base p+
Termination Termination
n-drift region
n + substrate
Collector
(a)
Anode
Gate p+-anode Gate
n+ n-base n+
Termination Termination
p-drift region
n + substrate
Cathode
(b)
Gate Gate
Emitter Emitter Emitter
insulator insulator
n+ n+ n+ n+
p-base p-base p-base
n-drift region
p+ substrate
Collector
(c)
Figure 10.2 Schematic cross-sectional views of bipolar power-switching devices: (a) BJT,
(b) thyristor, and (c) IGBT.
Source and
n -channel collector
MISFET contact
Gate Gate
Insulator Insulator
Source
Collector of BJT
p+ substrate
Emitter of BJT
BV ≈ EmaxWn/2 (10.2)
Putting εr of 10.4 for GaN [12] and 10.0 for 4H-SiC [13] (see Section
2.7) and the highest critical electric field (Ecritical) ever reported (i.e., 3.75
MV/cm [14] for GaN and 2.50 MV/cm for 4H-SiC [15]) (see Section 2.6),
respectively, into (10.1) and (10.2) leads to an optimum design of a one-
dimensional p-n diode with a uniformly doped drift layer (as shown in
Figure 10.5).
q ND
+++++++ ++++ x
−WDp − O Wn = WDn
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−q NA
(a)
−WDp Wn = WDn
x
O
−E max
(b)
10 18 10 3
16
1.5 × 10 15
10 16 10 1
10 15 10 0
10 14 10 −1
3
0.1 1 10 100
Breakdown voltage (kV)
(a)
10 18 10 3
Net donor density (cm −3 )
10 16 10 1
10 15 10 0
2.0 × 1014
1014 10 −1
80
0.1 1 10 100
Breakdown voltage (kV)
(b)
Figure 10.5 Optimum design of (a) GaN (0001) and (b) 4H-SiC (0001) abrupt p+/n−/n+
junction in which depletion-region width is equal to drift-layer thickness.
- −3 )
Optimized growth
10 17
Slope = 1
10 16
4H -SiC (0001) [20]
10 15 C/Si =1.2
C/Si = 1.8
10 14
10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2
SiH 4 flow rate (sccm, 100 ppm)
Figure 10.6 Reported net donor density in epitaxially grown GaN (0001) and 4H-SiC
(0001) as functions of flow rates of SiH4 and N2, respectively [16, 20].
to 2 × 1014 cm−3 by increasing the C/Si ratio from 1.2 to 1.8 [20] (solid
symbols in Figure 10.6). From Figures 10.5(b) and 10.6, it is predicted
that the highest BV is about 80 kV when drift-layer thickness is 640 μm.
Using such a thick drift layer, however, greatly increases RonA. By mak-
ing Wn smaller than WDn (to form a so-called p-i-n junction as shown in
Figure 10.7[a]), the electric-field profile becomes trapezoidal, as shown by
the solid lines in Figure 10.7(b). As the doping level in the drift layer (ND1)
decreases, the electric-field profile approaches a rectangle, as shown by the
dashed lines in Figure 10.7(b). BV thus approaches the maximum, given as
To take advantage of the lower and controllable ND, 4H-SiC bipolar di-
odes often use a p-i-n junction, which is described in Section 10.4. Note that
although “i” stands for intrinsic, a lightly-doped n-type layer is usually used
as an i-drift layer.
q ND2
q ND1 ++
+++++++ ++
−WDp x
− O Wn WDn
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−q NA
(a)
−WDp Wn WDn
x
O
−E max
Lower N D1
(b)
100
(mΩcm2 )
[21]
[18] [3]
1
[19]
[17]
0.1
102 103 104 105
Breakdown voltage (V)
Figure 10.8 Reported differential specific on-resistance of GaN p-n diodes (solid
symbols [3, 17−19]) and 4H-SiC p-i-n diodes (open symbols [21, 22]) versus breakdown
voltage.
400
300
200
100
100
90
3.5-kV 4H-SiC JBS 300 W/cm2
diode [24]
00 3.4
11
3.1
22 33 44 55
Forward voltage (V)
Figure 10.9 Reported current/voltage characteristics of a 5.0-kV GaN p-n diode [3] and
a 3.5-kV 4H-SiC junction barrier Schottky diode [24], together with a curve showing the
power-dissipation limit of a semiconductor package (i.e., 300 W/cm2) [23].
(i.e., carbon-ion implantation [31] and thermal oxidation [32]). Due to im-
proved crystal growth (i.e., reduced micropipe and defect densities) and ep-
itaxy (i.e., reduced epitaxial defects), carrier lifetime of epitaxial 4H-SiC was
improved and a 10-kV p-i-n diode with VF of 3.9V at 100 A/cm2 was demon-
strated in 2004 [30]. The i-drift layer used was 100-μm-thick and doped at
2 × 1014 cm−3. By applying carbon-ion implantation or thermal-oxidation, a
4H-SiC p-i-n diode with VF of about 4.0V at 100 A/cm2 was demonstrated in
2012 [33]. Its BV was calculated to be 18.5 kV in the case of a 120-μm-thick
i-drift layer doped at 7 × 1013 cm−3. RonAdiff was 3.3 mΩcm2 at BV of
12.9 kV (for a 100-μm-thick drift layer doped at 3 × 1014 cm−3) [21]
and 9.72 mΩcm2 at BV of 26.9 kV (for a 268-μm-thick drift layer doped at
1 − 2 × 1014 cm−3) [22], as shown by the open symbols in Figure 10.8.
where τHL is high-level injection lifetime. Average carrier density and stored
charge in the i-drift layer are thus given as
and
100
300 W/cm2
80
80
70
60
60
40
40
20
20
00
3
3.0 3.5
3.5 4
4.0 4.4 4.5
4.5 5
5.0
Forward voltage (V)
JF
Anode current density
slope: −k trr
0 t
Qrr
−J R
Figure 10.11 Schematic anode current-density and voltage waveforms of a p-i-n diode
during reverse recovery.
where trr is the reverse-recovery time shown in Figure 10.11. From (10.6)
and (10.7), trr and JR are expressed as
and
dRdriftA/dx = WN2(2EcriticalWN−3BVCBO)/
[2μnεrεo(EcriticalWN−BVCBO)2] (10.13)
and
and
1.01
BV CEO = BV CBO(1+ β0 )−1/10
0.9
0.9
BVCEO/BVCBO
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
1 10 10 2 10 3
β0
Figure 10.12 Ratio of BVCEO to BVCBO calculated using (10.15) as a function of common-
emitter current gain at low current. n is assumed to be 10 [36].
10 5
4H-SiC
10 4
μm)
WN_optimum (…
10 3 GaN
10 2
10 1
10 0
10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3
BV CEO (kV)
(a)
1017
1016
ND1_optimum (cm−3)
1015
1014 GaN
13
10
1012
4H-SiC
1011
10 0 10 1
10 2
10 3
BV CEO (kV)
(b)
Figure 10.13 (a) WN_optimum and (b) ND1_optimum calculated from (10.16a) and (10.16b) as a
function of BVCEO in the case BVCEO = 2BVCBO.
which is 1.4 × 1013 cm−2 in the case of GaN and 9.2 × 1012 cm−2 in the case
of 4H-SiC. Charge density in a base layer should be larger than Qcollector to
prevent emitter-collector punch through. In addition, base-layer thickness
WB should be less than electron diffusion length Ln (see Section 3.6.1.1) to
achieve high β0.
Moreover, a high base-doping level is desirable from the view point
of reducing emitter-current crowding, which is caused by base-current-in-
duced voltage drop in the p-type base layer [37]. However, the base-dop-
ing level should be low enough to maintain emitter-injection efficiency γE,
which is a measure of emitter current produced by electron injection from
the emitter into the base, and is expressed as [37]
γE = DnBtENDE+/(DnBtENDE++DpEWBNAB−) (10.18)
where DnB and DpE are, respectively, diffusivities for electrons in the base and
holes in the emitter, NDE+ and NAB− are, respectively, concentrations of ion-
ized donors in the emitter and acceptors in the base, and tE is emitter-layer
thickness.
where vs is electron saturation velocity (1 × 107 cm/s for Si [39]; 2.5 × 107
cm/s for GaN [40]; 3.3 × 106 cm/s for 4H-SiC [41]). When BVCBO = 1.2 kV
(i.e., BVCEO ≈ 0.6 kV), JCSB is calculated to be 0.17 kA/cm2 for silicon BJTs,
120 kA/cm2 for GaN BJTs, and 15 kA/cm2 for 4H-SiC BJTs. In the case of
silicon BJTs, JCSB lower than operational current-density is the cause for
the second breakdown. In the cases of GaN and 4H-SiC BJTs, on the other
hand, JCSB is larger than operational current-density, suggesting that GaN
and 4H-SiC BJTs are free from second breakdown.
0.95-kV BJTs [50]. In 2011, β0 of 257 and 335 were, respectively, attained
for BJTs formed on 4H-SiC (0001) and ( 000 1 ) substrates, although BVCEO
of these BJTs were not reported [51]. These extremely large β0 values were
achieved by utilizing optimized device geometry and continuous epitaxial
growth of the emitter-base junction, in combination with a deep-level-
reduction process to improve the lifetime in the base layer.
Wp2
Anode p1 n1 p2 n2 Cathode
J1 J2 J3
Anode current
Forward
conduction
Ih
BVR
Anode voltage
O Vh BV F
Reverse blocking Forward blocking
EC
EV
(2’) Hole injection
-- - - ++
- - ++++ - - ++
- - ++ + - - ++
-- + - - ++
J1 J2 J3
(a)
(6’)
Increase in (5’)
electron injection Increase in
forward bias
EC
EV
(5)
Increase in
forward bias
(6)
Increase in
hole injection
(4) (3) (3’) (4’)
Decrease in Decrease in Decrease in Decrease in
p1-depletion- n1-depletion- p2-depletion- n2-depletion-
region width region width region width region width
- + - +
-+ -+
- ++ - +
- -+
J1 J2 J3
(b)
Figure 10.16 Schematic band diagrams illustrating the conditions immediately (a) be-
fore and (b) after anode voltage reaching BVF shown in Figure 10.15.
[56], and 27-kV [8] n-channel IGBTs have been demonstrated. Owing to
conductivity modulation (see Section 3.7), RdriftA of IGBTs is greatly reduced
from that of MISFETs (see Section 9.7). In contrast, the switching loss of
Gate
Anode p1 n1 p2 n2 Cathode
Anode current
Ih
BV R IG > 0 IG = 0
Anode voltage
O Vh BV F
IGBTs is much larger than that of MISFETs. The reason for that switching-
loss difference is similar to the reverse recovery of p-i-n diodes described in
Section 10.4.3. Since the basic operating principles of SiC IGBTs are de-
scribed in detail in elsewhere [57, 58], this section only provides a brief
description of the turn-off characteristics of 4H-SiC IGBTs.
To turn IGBTs off, gate bias has to be reduced to zero (Figure 10.19[a]).
When gate bias becomes lower than threshold voltage, electron current in
the channel ceases. However, in the case of an inductive load, collector
current is sustained by holes stored in the n-type drift region, as shown
in Figure 10.19(b). Collector bias, on the other hand, begins to increase
immediately after gate bias becomes lower than threshold voltage (Figure
10.19[c]).
To quench the injection of holes, controlled vanadium doping during
4H-SiC epitaxial growth has been demonstrated; the resultant epilayer
doped with nitrogen and vanadium was reported to have a minority-carrier
lifetime below 20 ns [59].
VG
t
(a)
IC
t
(b)
VC
t
(c)
Figure 10.19 Schematic turn-off waveforms for n-channel IGBTs driving an inductive
load: (a) gate bias, (b) collector current, and (c) collector bias.
10.9 Summary
This chapter first describes the optimum design of a one-dimensional struc-
ture to provide a clear understanding of GaN p-n diodes. Then, for a clear
understanding of 4H-SiC p-i-n diodes, this chapter reviews stored charge
and reverse recovery. With respect to power-switching devices, the chapter
first discusses n-p-n BJTs from the viewpoints of collector/base design and
second breakdown. Subsequently, for a clear understanding of 4H-SiC thy-
ristors, the chapter describes Shockley diodes. Finally, the chapter provides
a brief introduction to the reported blocking voltage of 4H-SiC n-channel
IGBTs and their typical turn-off waveforms.
References
[1] Morisette, D. T., and J. A. Cooper, Jr., “Theoretical Comparison of SiC PiN and
Schottky Diodes Based on Power Dissipation Considerations,” IEEE Transac-
tions on Electron Devices, Vol. 49, No. 9, 2002, pp. 1657–1664.
[2] Kajitani, R., et al., “A High Current Operation in a 1.6 kV GaN-Based Trenched
Junction Barrier Schottky Diode,” Solid State Devices and Materials, Sapporo,
Sept. 27–30, 2015, pp. 1056–1057.
[3] Ohta, H., et al., “5.0 kV Breakdown-Voltage Vertical GaN p-n Junction
Diodes,” Extended Abstracts of International Solid State Devices and Materials,
Sendai, Sep. 19–22, 20017, pp. 671–672.
[4] Lochner, Z., et al., “NpN-GaN/InxGa1-xN/GaN Heterojunction Bipolar
Transistor on Freestanding GaN Substrate,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 99,
2011, pp. 193501-1–193501-3.
[5] Brooks, S. E., “Modeling and Simulation of 1700-V 8-A GeneSiC Superjunc-
tion Transistor,” Thesis and Dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville,
Aug. 2016.
[6] Palmour, J. W., “Silicon Carbide Power Device Development for Industrial
Markets,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec. 15–17,
2014, pp. 1–8.
[7] Song, X., et al., “22 kV SiC Emitter Turnoff (ETO) thyristor and Its Dynamic
Performance Including SOA,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor
Devices and ICs, Hong Kong, May 10–14, 2015, pp. 277–280.
[8] Brunt, E. V., et al., “27-kV, 20-A 4H-SiC n-IGBTs,” Materials Science Forum,
Vol. 821–823, 2015, pp. 847–850.
[9] Chang, H. R., and B. J. Baliga, “500-V n-Channel Insulated Gate Bipolar
Transistor with a Trench Gate Structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 36, No. 9, 1989, pp. 1824–1829.
[10] Singh, R., et al., “High Temperature SiC Trench Gate p-IGBT,” IEEE Transac-
tions on Electron Devices, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2003, pp. 774–784.
[11] Zhang, Q., et al., “10 kV Trench Gate IGBTs on 4H-SiC,” International Sympo-
sium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Santa Barbara, May 23–26, 2005,
pp. 159–162.
[12] Barker, Jr., A. S., and M. Ilegems, “Infrared Lattice Vibrations and Free-Elec-
tron Dispersion in GaN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1973, pp. 743–750.
[13] Patrick, L., and W. J. Choyke, “Static Dielectric Constant of SiC,” Physical
Review B, Vol. 2, No.6, 1970, pp. 2255–2256.
[14] Ozbek, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Planar Nearly Ideal Edge-Termination
Technique for GaN Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011,
pp. 300–302.
[15] Niwa, H., J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, “Impact Ionization Coefficients in 4H-
SiC Toward Ultrahigh-Voltage Power Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, Vol. 62, No. 10, 2015, pp. 3326–3333.
[16] Kizilyalli, I. C., et al., “Vertical Power p-n Diodes Based on Bulk GaN,” IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2015, pp. 414–421.
[17] Hatakeyama, Y., et al., “Over 3.0 GW/cm2 Figure-of-Merit GaN p-n Junction
Diodes on Freestanding GaN Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32,
No. 12, 2011, pp. 1674–1676.
[18] Hatakeyama, Y., et al., “High-Breakdown-Voltage and Low-Specific-on-Re-
sistance GaN p-n Junction Diodes on Freestanding GaN Substrates Fabricated
Through Low-Damage Field-Plate Process,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 52, 2013, pp. 028007-1–028007-3.
[19] Nomoto, K., et al., “GaN-on-GaN p-n Power Diodes with 3.48 kV and 0.95
mΩcm2: A Record High Figure-of-Merit of 12.8 GW/cm2,” International Elec-
tron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., Dec. 7–9, 2015, pp. 237–240.
[20] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology,
Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, p. 92.
[21] Sundarsesan, S., et al., “12.9 kV SiC PiN Diodes with Low On-State Drops
and High Carrier Lifetimes,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 717–720, 2012,
pp. 949–952.
[22] Kimoto, T., et al., “Progress in Ultrahigh-Voltage SiC Devices for Future
Power Infrastructure,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco,
Dec. 15–17, 2014, pp. 36–39.
[23] Zhang, Q., et al., “12-kV p-Channel IGBTs with Low On-Resistance in
4H-SiC,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1027–1029.
[24] Brosselard, P., et al., “High Temperature Behaviour of 3.5 kV 4H-SiC JBS
Diodes,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Jeju,
May 27–30, 2007, pp. 285–288.
[25] Sugawara, Y., et al., “6.2 kV 4H-SiC Pin Diode with Low Forward Voltage
Drop,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 338–342, 2000, pp. 1371–1374.
[26] Chilukuri, R. K., et al., “High Voltage p-n Junction Diodes in Silicon Carbide
Using Field Plate Edge Termination,” MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 572,
1999, pp. 81–86.
[27] Singh, R., “Silicon Carbide Bipolar Power Devices—Potentials and Limits,”
MRS Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 640, 2001, pp. H4.2.1–H4.2.12.
[28] Fedison, J. B., et al., “Al/C/B Co-implanted High Voltage 4H-SiC Pin Junction
Rectifiers,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 338–342, 2000, pp. 1367–1370.
[29] Kimoto, T., et al., “Promise and Challenges of High-Voltage SiC Bipolar Power
Devices,” Energies, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2016, pp. 908-1–908-15.
[30] Das, M. K., et al., “High Power, Drift-Free 4H-SiC PiN Diodes,” International
Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2004, pp. 860–864.
[31] Storasta, L., and H. Tsuchida, “Reduction of Traps and Improvement of Car-
rier Lifetime in 4H-SiC Epilayers by Ion Implantation,” Applied Physics Letters,
Vol. 90, No. 6, 2007, pp. 062116-1–062116-3.
[32] Hiyoshi, T., and T. Kimoto, “Reduction of Deep Levels and Improvement of
Carrier Lifetime in n-Type 4H-SiC by Thermal Oxidation,” Applied Physics
Express, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2009, pp. 041101-1–041101-3.
[33] Nakayama, K., et al., “Characteristics of a 4H-SiC Pin Diode with Carbon Im-
plantation/Thermal Oxidation,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 59,
No. 4, 2012, pp. 895–901.
[34] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, pp. 203–212.
[35] Von Muench, W., P. Hoeck, and E. Pettenpaul, “Silicon Carbide Field-Effect
and Bipolar Transistors,” International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington,
D.C., Dec. 5–7, 1977, pp. 337–339.
[36] Chow, T. P., “High-Voltage SiC and GaN Power Devices,” Microelectronics
Engineering, Vol. 83, No. 1, 2006, pp. 112–122.
[37] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, p. 442.
[38] Huang, A. Q., and B. Zhang, “The Future of Bipolar Power Transistors,” IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 48, No. 11, 2001, pp. 2535–2543.
[39] Jacoboni, C., et al., “A Review of Some Charge Transport Properties of
Silicon,” Solid State Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1977, pp. 77–89.
[40] Bhapkar, U. V., and M. S. Shur, “Monte Carlo Calculation of Velocity-Field
Characteristics of Wurtzite GaN,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 82, No. 4,
1997, pp. 1649–1655.
[41] Sankin, V. I., and A. A. Lepneva, “Electron Saturated Vertical Velocities in
Silicon Carbide Polytypes,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 338–342, 2000,
pp. 769–771.
[42] Terano, A., T. Tsuchiya, and K. Mochizuki, “Characteristics of GaN-Based
Bipolar Transistors on Sapphire Substrates with the n-Type Emitter Region
Formed Using Si-ion Implantation,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 61, No. 10, 2014, pp. 3411–3416.
[43] Mochizuki, K., “Vertical GaN Bipolar Devices: Gaining Competitive
Advantage from Photon Recycling,” Physica Status Solidi A, Vol. 214, No. 3,
2017, pp. 1600489-1–1600489-8.
[44] Nakamura, T., et al., “High Performance SiC Trench Devices with Ultra-low
Ron,” International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., June 5–7, 2011,
pp. 599–601.
[45] Ryu, S.-H., et al., “1800V NPN Bipolar Junction Transistors in 4H-SiC,” IEEE
Electron Device Letters, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2001, pp. 124–126.
[46] Ghandi, R., et al., “Fabrication of 2700-V 12 mΩ-cm2 Non-ion-implanted
4H-SiC BJTs with Common-Emitter Current Gain of 50,” IEEE Electron Device
Letters, Vol. 29, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1135–1137.
[47] Miyake, H., et al., “21-kV SiC BJTs with Space-Modulated Junction
Termination Extension,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 29, No. 11, 2008,
pp. 1598–1600.
[48] Miyake, H., T. Kimoto, and J. Suda, “Improvement of Current Gain in 4H-SiC
BJTs by Surface Passivation with Deposited Oxides Nitrided in N2O or NO,”
IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011, pp. 285–287.
[49] Zhang, Q., et al., “4H-SiC BJTs with Current Gain of 110,” Solid State Electronics,
Vol. 52, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1008–1010.
[50] Nonaka, N., et al., “A New High Current Gain 4H-SiC Bipolar Junction
Transistor with Suppressed Surface Recombination Structure: SSR-BJT,”
Materials Science Forum, Vol. 615–617, 2009, pp. 821–824.
[51] Miyake, H., T. Kimoto, and J. Suda, “4H-SiC BJTs with Record Current Gains
of 257 on (0001) and 335 on ( 000 1 ),” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32,
No. 7, 2011, pp. 841–843.
[52] Das, M. K., et al., “A 13-kV 4H-SiC n-Channel IGBT with Low Rdiff,on and Fast
Switching,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 600–603, 2008, pp. 1183–1186.
[53] Zhang, Q., et al., “SiC Power Devices for Microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on
Power Electronics, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2010, pp. 2889–2896.
[54] Ryu, S., et al., “Ultra High Voltage (> 12 kV), High Performance 4H-SiC IG-
BTs,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Bruges,
July 3–7, 2012, pp. 257–260.
[55] Yonezawa, Y., et al., “Low Vf and Highly Reliable 16 kV Ultrahigh Voltage SiC
Flip-Type n-Channel Implantation and Epitaxial IGBT,” International Electron
Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., Dec. 9–11, 2013, pp. 164–167.
[56] Brunt, E. V., et al., “22 kV, 1 cm2, 4H-SiC n-IGBTs with Improved Conductiv-
ity Modulation,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs,
Waikoloa, June 15–19, 2014, pp. 358–361.
[57] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, Singa-
pore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, pp. 373–392.
[58] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, Chapter 17.
[59] Miyazawa, T., et al., “Vanadium Doping in 4H-SiC Epitaxial Growth for Carrier
Lifetime Control,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 9, 2016, pp. 11130-1– 11130-4.
11
Contents
Edge Terminations
11.1 Introduction
229
Insulating Insulating
film Anode electrode film Anode electrode
p+
A
B
n−-GaN n− -GaN
n +-GaN n +-GaN
Insulating
film Anode electrode
p+
C
n− -GaN
n +-GaN
Cathode electrode
(c)
Anode electrode
Field plate Field plate p+-GaN
Anode electrode
Insulating film Insulating film
n− -GaN
n−-GaN
n +-GaN
Cathode electrode
n +-GaN
(b)
Cathode electrode
(a)
Anode electrode
Field plate
n +-GaN
Cathode electrode
(c)
Figure 11.2 Schematic cross-sections of (a) a planar field-plate-terminated GaN SBD, (b)
a mesa-field-plate-terminated GaN p-n diode, and (c) a mesa-field-plate-terminated GaN
SBD.
VLD structure is fabricated in such a way that p-type dopant ions are im-
planted through a striped mask whose share of open areas decreases from
the p+ anode region to the edge region. The subsequent p+ drive-in diffu-
sion process results in a profile with decreasing doping concentration and
decreasing depth toward the edge region. In the case of 4H-SiC power de-
vices, on the other hand, drive-in diffusion is impractical due to negligible
diffusivity of aluminum and anomalous diffusion of boron (see Section 7.4).
Instead, several advanced types of JTEs—including the following ones that
minimize the number of lithography and implantation steps—have been
proposed: space-modulated JTE (SM-JTE) (Figure 11.4[d]) [11], counter-
doped JTE (CD-JTE) (Figure 11.4[e]) [12], and hybrid-JTE (Figure 11.4[h])
[13], which combines ring-assisted JTE (RA-JTE) (Figure 11.4[f]) and mul-
tiple-floating-zone JTE (MFZ-JTE) (Figure 11.4[g]). It should be noted that
surface of 4H-SiC is usually passivated with SiO2, and the positive charge
at the SiO2/4H-SiC interface (Qf) compensates the negatively ionized accep-
tors in the JTE region [14−16]. A JTE that has a greater tolerance to φ can
thus have a greater tolerance to Qf [12].
Polyimide
Field -plate electrode
Anode electrode
p+GaN p+GaN p+GaN
5.5-μm-thick un -GaN
n +GaN substrate
Cathode electrode
Figure 11.4 Schematic cross-sections of (a) FLRs, (b) a JTE, (c) a variation of lateral dop-
ing (VLD), (d) a space-modulated JTE (SM-JTE), (e) a counter-doped JTE (CD-JTE), (f) a
ring-assisted JTE (RA-JTE), (g) a multiple-floating-zone JTE (MFZ-JTE), and (h) a hybrid-JTE.
10 −4
10 −5
10 −7
10 −8
25
20 SM-JTE
10
0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
JTE dose ( × 10 13 cm−2)
the open circles in Figure 11.7, BV of 4H-SiC p-i-n diodes terminated with
uniformly doped JTE degrades when Qf is positive. In contrast, BV of p-i-n
diodes terminated with CD-JTE degrades little up to Qf = 6 × 1012 cm−2 (solid
circles in Figure 11.7), and that lack of BV degradation indicates superior
robustness of BV against process variation [12].
0
−6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6 8 10
- charge density Qf (×10 12 cm−2)
SiO 2/SiC interface
6
RA -JTE
Hybrid-JTE
5
Breakdown voltage (kV)
1
0.5 1 1.5
JTE dose ( × 10 13 cm−2)
Figure 11.8 Reported JTE dose dependence of measured breakdown voltages of 4H-SiC
p-i-n diodes with 180-μm-wide hybrid-JTE, 120-μm-wide RA-JTE, 90-μm-wide MFZ-JTE, and
120-μm-wide uniformly doped JTE. Thickness and donor concentration of the i-layer are,
respectively, 40 μm and 2 × 1015 cm−3. The JTE doses of 9 × 1012 and 1.25 × 1013 cm−2 are
respectively estimated from the implanted doses of 1.3 × 1013 and 1.8 × 1013 cm−2 under the
assumption of activation ratio of 70% [29].
RA-JTE (Figure 11.3[h]). As shown in Figure 11.8, a high dose in the opti-
mized RA-JTE and uniformly doped JTE drastically reduce BV. This reduc-
tion was attributed to a high electric field at the outer edge of the JTEs [29].
Since the dose dependence of BV of the optimized MFZ-JTE is opposite
to that of the optimized RA-JTE and that of the uniformly doped JTE, as
for the hybrid-JTE, the optimum dose window for obtaining nearly ideal
breakdown voltage is enlarged.
11.6 Summary
This chapter introduces mesa-field-plate termination structures for GaN
power devices, as well as space-modulated-, counter-doped-, and hybrid-
JTEs for 4H-SiC power devices as advanced termination structures. Readers
should also refer to the latest papers on termination structures for vertical
GaN and 4H-SiC power devices , since related research is still being actively
conducted.
References
[1] Ozbeck, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Planar Nearly Ideal Edge Termination
Technique for GaN Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011,
pp. 300–302.
[2] Ozbeck, A. M., and B. J. Baliga, “Finite-Zone Argon Implant Edge-Termina-
tion For High-Voltage GaN Schottky Rectifiers,” IEEE Electron Device Letters,
Vol. 32, No. 10, 2011, pp. 1361–1363.
[3] Alok, D., B. J. Baliga, and P. K. McLarty, “A Simple Edge Termination for Sili-
con Carbide with Nearly Ideal Breakdown Voltage,” IEEE Electron Device Letters,
Vol. 15, No. 10, 1994, pp. 394–395.
[4] Conti, F., and M. Conti, “Surface Breakdown in Silicon Planar Diodes Equipped
with Field Plate,” Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1972, pp. 93–105.
[5] Nomoto, K., et al., “Over 1.0 kV GaN p-n Junction Diodes on Freestanding
GaN Substrates,” Physica Status Solidi A, Vol. 208, No. 7, 2011, pp. 1535–1537.
[6] Ohta, H., et al., “5.0 kV Breakdown-Voltage Vertical GaN p-n Junction
Diodes,” Extended Abstracts of International Solid State Devices and Materials, Sen-
dai, Sep. 19–22, 20017, pp. 671–672.
[7] Kao, Y. C., and E. D. Wolley, “High-Voltage Planar p-n Junctions,” Proceedings
of IEEE, Vol. 55, No. 8, 1967, pp. 1409–1414.
[8] Temple, V. A. K., and W. Tantraporn, “Junction Termination Extension for
Near-Ideal Breakdown Voltage in p-n Junctions,” IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, Vol. 33, No. 10, 1986, pp. 1601–1608.
[9] Perez, R., et al., “Planar Edge Termination Design and Technology Consid-
erations for 1.7-kV 4H-SiC PiN Diodes,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices,
Vol. 52, No. 10, 2005, pp. 2309-2316.
[10] Stengl, R., and U. Gösele, “Variation of Lateral Doping—A New Concept to
Avoid High Voltage Breakdown of Planar Junction,” International Electron De-
vices Meeting, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1–4, 1985, pp. 154–157.
[11] Feng, G., J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, “Space-Modulated Junction Termination
Extension for Ultrahigh-Voltage p-i-n Diodes in 4H-SiC,” IEEE Transactions on
Electron Devices, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2012, pp. 414–418.
[12] Huang, C., et al., “Counter-doped JTE, an Edge Termination for HV SiC De-
vices with Increased Tolerance to the Surface Charge,” IEEE Transactions on
Electron Devices, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2015, pp. 354–358.
[13] Sung, W., and B. J. Baliga, “A Comparative Study 4500-V Edge Termina-
tion Techniques for SiC Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 64,
No. 4, 2017, pp. 1647-1652.
[14] Sheridan, D. C., et al, “Comparison and Optimization of Edge Termination
Techniques for SiC Power Devices,” International Symposium on Power Semicon-
ductor Devices and ICs, Osaka, June 4–7, 2001, pp. 191–194.
[15] Matsushima, H., et al, “Measuring Depletion-Layer Capacitance to Analyze a
Decrease in Breakdown Voltage of 4H-SiC Diodes,” Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 119, 2016, 154506-1-154506-6.
[16] Matsushima, H, et al, “Analyzing Charge Distribution in the Termination
Area of 4H-SiC Diodes by Measuring Depletion-Layer Capacitance,” Japanese
Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 55, 2016, 04ER17-1-04ER17-5.
[17] Kimoto, T., and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology, Singa-
pore: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, pp. 427–434.
[18] Baliga, B. J., Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide Power Devices, Singapore: World
Scientific, 2017, pp. 90–115.
[19] Oka, T., et al., “Vertical GaN-Based Trench Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field-
Effect Transistors on a Freestanding GaN Substrate with Blocking Voltage of
1.6 kV,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, pp. 021022-1–021022-3.
[20] Tanaka, N. et al., “50A Vertical GaN Schottky Barrier Diode on a Freestanding
GaN Substrate with Blocking Voltage of 790V,” Applied Physics Express, Vol. 8,
2015, pp. 071001-1−071001-3.
[21] Song, Q.-W., et al., “Simulation Study on 4H-SiC Power Devices with High-
k Dielectric FP Terminations,” Diamond & Related Materials, Vol. 22, 2012,
pp. 42−47.
[22] Yoshino, M., et al., “High-k Dielectric Passivation for GaN Diode with a Field
Plate Termination,” Electronics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016, pp. 15-1−15-7.
[23] Barker, Jr., A. S., and M. Ilegems, “Infrared Lattice Vibrations and Free-
Electron Dispersion in GaN,” Physical Review B, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1973,
pp. 743–750.
[24] Kimoto, T., et al., “Progress in Ultrahigh-Voltage SiC Devices for Future
Power Infrastructure,” International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco,
Dec. 15–17, 2014, pp. 36–39.
[25] Niwa, H., J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, “21.7 kV 4H-SiC PiN Diode with a Space-
Modulated Junction Termination Extension,” Applied Physics Express, Vo. 5,
No. 6, 2012, pp. 1598-1600.
[26] Miyake, H., et al., “21 kV SiC BJTs with Space-Modulated Junction Ter-
mination Extension,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2012,
pp. 1598-1600.
[27] Kinoshita, K., et al., “Guard Ring Assisted RESURF: A New Termination
Structure Providing Stable and High Breakdown Voltage for SiC Power De-
vices,” International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Santa Fe,
June 4–7, 2002, pp. 253–256.
[28] Sung, W., et al., “A New Edge Termination Technique for High-Voltage Devic-
es in 4H-SiC-Multiple-Floating-Zone Junction Termination Extension,” IEEE
Electron Device Letters, Vol. 32, No. 7, 2011, pp. 880–882.
[29] Sung, W., and B. J. Baliga, “A Near Ideal Edge Termination Technique for
4500 V 4H-SiC Devices: The Hybrid Junction Termination Extension,” IEEE
Electron Device Letters, Vol. 37, No. 12, 2016, pp. 1609–1612.
12
Contents
Reliability of
12.1 Introduction
Vertical GaN and SiC
12.2 Tolerance to HTRB
Stress Power Devices
12.3 Tolerance to HTGB
Stress
12.8 Summary
12.2 Tolerance to HTRB Stress
HTRB tests verify long-term stability of semi-
conductor-chip leakage. Semiconductor chips
or power modules (Figure 12.1) are stressed
with a reverse voltage (e.g., 80% of the rated
blocking capability of power devices) at an am-
bient temperature of their operational limit.
241
Insulating resin
Bond wire
semi-
conductor
chip
3 10 −5
Vth
I DS
1 10 −7
0 100 200 300
Time (h)
Figure 12.2 Reported results of HTRB tests on vertical GaN transistors on GaN substrates
[5].
10 −2
10 −3
VDS = 960V, VGS = 0V
10 −4 150°C
IDS @960 V (A)
10−5
10 −6
10 −7
10 −8
10 −9
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Time (h)
6
150°C
4
Vth (V)
Vth = +20V
3
2 Vth = −10V
0
200 400 600 800 1000
Time (h)
H3TRB tests (at 85°C, 85% relative humidity, and 80V) of GaN p-n diodes,
a few diodes failed after 850 hours due to delamination caused by water
ingress from chip edges. After improving the encapsulation dielectric layer,
however, no diodes failed in further H3TRB tests [4].
According to the reported results of H3TRB tests on commercial 0.3−0.8-
kV 4H-SiC MISFET power modules at 90°C, 90% relative humidity, and
65% rated voltage, two out of five modules failed after 690 and 860 hours;
the former was due to failure of the diode connected with the MISFET chip,
and the latter was due to failure in the gate oxide [7]. It should be noted
that even in the case of three modules that passed the H3TRB test, RonA
increased, showing that tolerance of 4H-SiC MISFET power modules to
H3TRB stress needs to be further improved.
Gate 0
Drain-source current (A)
Source Source
p+ n+ n + p+ −1
1h
p p
−2
Body-diode current 0h
−3
100-μm-thick, 6 ×10 14 cm−3-doped
n drift layer −4
VGS = −10V
n + 4H- SiC substrate
−5
Drain −12 −10 −8 −6 −4 −2
Drain-source voltage (V)
(a) (b)
Figure 12.5 (a) Schematic cross-section and (b) reported current/voltage characteristics
of a body diode in a 4H-SiC MISFET [16].
30
10
0 5 10 15 20
Injection time at 75 A/cm2 (min)
lator to the point of causing catastrophic failure, a gate rupture failure can
also occur [20].
However, neutron-induced failures are not well understood in the cases
of GaN and 4H-SiC power devices [20−26]. For example, in one study, GaN
p-n diodes were exposed to 1-MeV 3 × 1013-cm−2 neutrons [21]. According
to the results of that study, RonA increased from 2−3 mΩcm2 by 3 mΩcm2,
while breakdown voltage BV decreased from 1,740V by 80V. Such degrada-
tion of RonA and BV indicates that both on- and off-state performances are
impacted by radiation-induced defects within the drift region of GaN p-n
diodes. On the other hand, when tolerances of commercial silicon and 4H-
SiC MISFETs to terrestrial neutron radiation were compared [20], it was
found that although neutrons give rise to fewer failures in SiC MISFETs
compared to silicon MISFETs, the failure modes in SiC MISFETs can differ
depending on the vendor. These results show that tolerances of vertical GaN
and 4H-SiC power devices to terrestrial cosmic radiation have to be further
investigated.
12.8 Summary
This chapter briefly describes reported results of HTRB-, HTGB-, H3TRB-,
TC-, HTO-, and terrestrial cosmic radiation tests on vertical GaN and 4H-SiC
power devices. Readers should refer also to the latest papers on such reli-
ability tests because related research is still being actively conducted.
References
[1] JEDEC, Solid State Technology Association, Temperature, Bias, and Operating Life,
JESD22-A108D, 2005.
[2] JEITA, Environmental and Endurance Test Methods for Semiconductor Devices, EIAJ
ED-4701/100, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.
[3] Lutz, J., et al., Semiconductor Power Devices Physics, Characterization, Reliability,
Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 380−411.
[4] Kizilyalli, I. C., et al., “Reliability Studies of Vertical GaN Devices Based on
Bulk GaN Substrates,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 55, No. 9−10, 2015,
pp. 1654–1661.
[5] Shibata, D., et al., “1.7 kV/1.0 mΩcm2 Normally-Off Vertical GaN Transistor
on GaN Substrate with Regrown p-GaN/AlGaN/GaN Gate Structure,” Interna-
tional Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, Dec. 5–7, 2016, pp. 248–251.
[6] Yang, L., and A. Castellazzi, “High Temperature Gate-Bias and Reverse-
Bias Tests on SiC MOSFETs,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 53, 2013,
pp. 1771–1773.
[7] Ionita, C., and M. Nawaz, “End User Reliability Assessment of 1.2–1.7
kV Commercial SiC MOSFET Power Modules,” International Reliability
Physics Symposium, Monterey, April 2–6, 2017, pp. WB-1.1–WB-1.6.
[8] Lelis, A., et al., “Time Dependence of Bias-Stress-Induced SiC MOSFET
Threshold Voltage Instability Measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, Vol. 55, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1835–1840.
[9] Lelis, A., et al., “Temperature-Dependence of SiC MOSFET Threshold-Voltage
Instability,” Materials Science Forum, Vol. 600–603, 2009, pp. 807–810.
[10] Minzari, D., et al., “Electrochemical Migration on Electronic Chip Resistors in
Chloride Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Device Materials Reliability, Vol. 9,
No. 3, 2009, pp. 392–402.
[11] Wang, H., et al., “Transitioning to Physics-of-Failure as a Reliability Driver
in Power Electronics,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power
Electronics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2014, pp. 97–113.
[12] Kimmering, L. C., “Recombination Enhanced Defect Reactions,” Solid-State
Electronics, Vol. 21, 1978, pp. 1391–1401.
[13] Maeda, K., K. Suzuki, and M. Ichihara, “Recombination Enhanced Dislocation
Glide in Silicon Carbide Observed In-Situ by Transmission Electron Micros-
copy,” Microscopy, Microanalysis, Microstructures, Vol. 4, 1993, pp. 211–220.
[14] Sugiura, L., “Dislocation Motion in GaN Light-Emitting Devices and Its
Effect on Device Lifetime,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 81, No. 4, 1997,
pp. 1633–1638.
[15] Skowronski, M., and S. Ha, “Degradation of Hexagonal Silicon-
Carbide-Based Bipolar Devices,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 99, 2006,
pp. 011101-1–011101-24.
[16] Agarwal, A., “A New Degradation Mechanism in High-Voltage SiC Power
MOSFETs,” IEEE Electron Devices Letters, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2007, pp. 587–589.
251
253