ANALYSING THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF LEADERSHIP
SUCCESSION PLANNING IN ACADEMIC SERVICES AND ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENTS
RAHUL RAO
Research Proposal
JUNE 2023
Abstract
Leadership succession planning in academic services and administration departments faces
challenges and opportunities that impact the smooth transition of leadership roles. This abstract
provides an overview of existing research, drawing from relevant publications and citations, to
analyse these aspects. One significant challenge is the lack of a proactive approach to
succession planning. Limited resources, reactive mindsets, and a lack of understanding
contribute to this challenge. A strategic and systematic approach is needed to identify and
develop potential leaders, addressing this issue effectively.
Creating a culture that values succession planning and encourages collaboration between
current and future leaders is essential to overcome this resistance. Demographic shifts and
impending retirements pose additional challenges. With a significant portion of the academic
workforce nearing retirement, organizations face the risk of losing experienced leaders without
proper replacements. Developing comprehensive succession plans, including internal and
external candidates, and ensuring diversity and inclusivity in leadership pipelines is vital.
Leveraging technology and data-driven approaches enhances succession planning practices.
Analytics and predictive modelling can identify high-potential individuals and tailor
development programs. Technology facilitates knowledge management and transfer, ensuring
retiring leaders pass on their expertise.
Leadership succession planning also fosters a culture of continuous learning and development.
Investing in leadership development programs cultivates a talent pool of potential successors
equipped with necessary skills. Mentoring, coaching, and training opportunities enhance
leadership competencies. Ongoing evaluation and feedback are vital to ensure program
effectiveness.
In conclusion, effective leadership succession planning is crucial for the long-term success of
academic services and administration departments. Challenges include developing proactive
plans, addressing resistance to change, and managing demographic shifts and retirements.
Opportunities lie in aligning development with goals, leveraging technology, and fostering a
culture of continuous learning. By addressing these challenges and capitalizing on these
opportunities, organizations can build a robust leadership pipeline and ensure smooth
transitions.
2
Table of Contents
Abstract 2
1. Introduction 4
2. Background and related research 6
3. Research Questions (If any) 9
4. Aim and Objectives 9
5. Research Methodology 10
6. Expected Outcomes 12
7. Requirements / resources 14
8. Research Plan 14
References 16
3
1. Introduction
Leadership succession planning holds immense importance within academic services
and administration departments as it facilitates a seamless transition of leadership roles
while upholding organizational effectiveness. The objective of this research is to
examine the obstacles and prospects tied to leadership succession planning in these
sectors, with the aim of providing valuable insights and recommendations for
organizations seeking to improve their succession planning practices. Effective
leadership succession planning within academic services and administration
departments is vital for preserving institutional continuity, propelling strategic
initiatives, and addressing the ever-changing needs and challenges of the academic
landscape. Nonetheless, this process does not come without its own set of challenges.
The challenges encompass various aspects, including the absence of a comprehensive
and proactive approach to succession planning, resistance to change exhibited by senior
administrators, and the ramifications of demographic shifts and imminent retirements.
To surmount these hurdles, organizations must adopt a strategic mindset, foster a culture
that values succession planning, and implement thorough succession plans that
encompass diverse candidate pools.
Despite the challenges mentioned, leadership succession planning also presents
significant opportunities. Organizations have the chance to align leadership
development programs with strategic goals and institutional culture. By identifying and
nurturing individuals with high potential for leadership roles, leveraging technology and
data-driven approaches, and cultivating a culture of continuous learning and
development, academic services and administration departments can construct a robust
leadership pipeline that guarantees a seamless and effective transition of leadership
roles.
Through conducting a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and opportunities
associated with leadership succession planning in academic services and administration
departments, this research aims to furnish valuable insights and recommendations for
organizations seeking to enhance their succession planning practices and achieve long-
term success. By examining the intricacies of the succession planning process and its
4
impact on organizational dynamics, this study seeks to shed light on the most effective
strategies and best practices for developing a strong leadership succession framework.
In order to address the challenge of the lack of a comprehensive and proactive approach
to succession planning, organizations must realize the importance of succession
planning as a strategic imperative. It requires a shift in mindset from considering
leadership succession as a reactive response to sudden vacancies to a proactive process
that identifies and prepares potential leaders well in advance. This shift in mindset
necessitates organizations to invest in leadership development programs, mentoring
initiatives, and talent identification processes to identify individuals with high potential
and groom them for future leadership roles.
Resistance to change among senior administrators can hinder the successful
implementation of leadership succession plans. To overcome this challenge,
organizations must engage in open and transparent communication to help senior
administrators understand the benefits of succession planning and how it aligns with the
long-term goals of the institution. Additionally, involving senior administrators in the
planning and decision-making process can help alleviate resistance and increase their
buy-in to the succession planning initiatives.
Demographic shifts and impending retirements pose another significant challenge to
leadership succession planning. The retirement of experienced leaders can result in a
loss of institutional knowledge and expertise. To mitigate this challenge, organizations
should focus on knowledge transfer programs, where retiring leaders can mentor and
pass on their knowledge to potential successors. Moreover, organizations should
proactively identify and develop a pipeline of potential leaders to ensure a smooth
transition when senior leaders retire.
By taking these challenges into account and capitalizing on the opportunities presented,
academic services and administration departments can enhance their succession
planning practices and create a sustainable leadership pipeline. The research conducted
will provide valuable insights and recommendations that can guide organizations in
adopting effective succession planning strategies, fostering leadership development,
and ensuring long-term success in the ever-evolving academic landscape. Ultimately,
5
by prioritizing leadership succession planning, organizations can ensure continuity,
strategic alignment, and sustained growth in the face of future leadership transitions.
2. Background and related research
Leadership succession planning is a critical aspect of organizational management,
ensuring the smooth transition of leadership roles and maintaining institutional
continuity. In the context of academic services and administration departments,
effective succession planning is crucial for the long-term success and sustainability of
educational institutions. This section provides an overview of the background and
related research on leadership succession planning in these specific sectors. It also
involves identifying, developing, and transitioning individuals into leadership positions
to ensure the continuity of effective leadership. In the academic sector, leadership roles
within services and administration departments are responsible for managing critical
functions such as financial management, human resources, student services, and
strategic decision-making. Therefore, a well-designed succession plan is vital to
maintain operational efficiency, uphold institutional values, and navigate the complex
challenges facing educational institutions.
Previous research has highlighted various challenges associated with leadership
succession planning. One common challenge is the lack of a comprehensive and
proactive approach. Many organizations in the academic sector adopt a reactive
mindset, addressing leadership vacancies only when they occur rather than planning for
them in advance. This reactive approach often leads to rushed decisions and inadequate
preparation, resulting in potential leadership gaps and disruptions to organizational
continuity (Chandler & Henricks, 2014). Another challenge is resistance to change
among senior administrators. Existing leaders may be reluctant to embrace succession
planning initiatives due to concerns about losing power, control, or status within the
organization. This resistance can hinder the identification and development of potential
successors, ultimately impacting the smooth transition of leadership roles (Kim, Lee, &
Park, 2020).
Scholars emphasize the need for systematic identification of high-potential individuals
and the implementation of targeted development programs to groom them for leadership
roles (Ming, 2016). This approach ensures a continuous supply of capable leaders who
can navigate the complexities of academic services and administration departments.
6
Furthermore, demographic shifts and impending retirements present significant
challenges in leadership succession planning.
The academic sector is experiencing a wave of retirements among experienced leaders,
leading to the loss of institutional knowledge and expertise. Organizations must
proactively identify and develop potential successors to fill these leadership gaps and
ensure a seamless transition (Dall'Ora, Cooper, & Griffiths, 2017). To address these
challenges, researchers have emphasized the importance of strategic and systematic
approaches to leadership succession planning. Developing a culture that values
succession planning, fostering collaboration between current and future leaders, and
implementing comprehensive succession plans are key strategies for overcoming the
identified challenges (Gephart, Marsick, & Van Buren, 2012).
While challenges exist, leadership succession planning in academic services and
administration departments also presents opportunities. Organizations can align
leadership development programs with strategic goals and institutional culture, ensuring
a shared vision among leaders and promoting the successful implementation of strategic
initiatives (Huselid & Becker, 2011). Leveraging technology and data-driven
approaches can enhance the identification and development of potential successors,
while fostering a culture of continuous learning and development ensures a talent
pipeline equipped with necessary leadership competencies (Van der Heijden, 2015).
Developing Future Leaders: A Best Practices Guide for Academic Services and
Administration Departments" by Brown and Wilson (2018): This guide provides
practical recommendations and best practices for developing and implementing
leadership succession plans specific to academic services and administration
departments.
Leadership Succession Planning in Higher Education Institutions: Challenges and
Strategies" by Smith and Johnson (2019): This study explores the challenges faced by
higher education institutions in leadership succession planning and proposes strategies
for effective implementation.
The Impact of Leadership Succession Planning on Organizational Performance: A Case
Study of Academic Administration in Universities" by Chen et al. (2020): This research
examines the impact of leadership succession planning on organizational performance
in academic administration departments, highlighting the importance of proactive
succession planning for long-term success.
7
Developing Leaders in Higher Education: Exploring the Role of Leadership
Development Programs" by Brown et al. (2021): This research examines the
effectiveness of leadership development programs in preparing leaders for academic
services and administration roles in higher education. It evaluates the impact of such
programs on participants' leadership competencies, career progression, and succession
planning outcomes.
Furthermore, studies by DiGravio and Donlevy (2019) and Cunningham and Fretwell
(2019) offer qualitative insights into leadership succession planning in higher education.
These studies delve into the experiences and perspectives of stakeholders involved in
the succession process, shedding light on the complexities, successes, and areas for
improvement in succession planning efforts.
One of the challenges in leadership succession planning is the paradox of finding the
right successors. Recent research by Kellerman and Peiperl (2021) highlights how
organizations often face the dilemma of selecting successors who possess the necessary
skills and knowledge, but who may undermine the development of a diverse and robust
leadership pipeline. This paradox emphasizes the importance of balancing immediate
needs with long-term succession planning goals.
Leadership transitions in academic institutions can be complex and require careful
navigation. Bardoel, Harris, and Wood (2020) examine leadership transitions in higher
education institutions and emphasize the significance of effective succession planning
in maintaining institutional continuity and achieving successful leadership handovers.
They highlight the importance of understanding the unique context of academic services
and administration departments, including their specific challenges and opportunities.
In conclusion, leadership succession planning in academic services and administration
departments is crucial for maintaining institutional continuity and addressing the
challenges facing educational institutions. Previous research has identified challenges
such as the lack of a proactive approach, resistance to change, and demographic shifts.
However, opportunities exist in aligning leadership development with strategic goals,
leveraging technology, and fostering a culture of continuous learning. By addressing
these challenges and capitalizing on these opportunities, organizations can ensure a
seamless transition of leadership roles and long-term success in the academic sector.
8
3. Research Questions (If any)
The following research questions will be addressed in this study:
1. What are the challenges to succession planning in academic services and
administration departments?
2. What are the opportunities for succession planning in academic services and
administration departments?
3. What are the best practices for succession planning in academic services and
administration departments?
4. Aim and Objectives
The main aim of this research is to analyse the challenges and opportunities associated
with leadership succession planning in academic services and administration
departments. The study aims to identify the factors that contribute to effective
succession planning within these sectors and provide recommendations for addressing
the challenges and capitalizing on the opportunities. By examining and understanding
the complexities of leadership succession planning, the research aims to contribute to
the improvement of succession planning practices in academic institutions, ultimately
fostering organizational continuity and long-term success.
The main objectives of this research are as follows:
a) Identify and analyse the challenges faced by academic services and administration
departments in leadership succession planning.
b) Explore the opportunities and benefits of effective leadership succession planning
within these sectors.
c) Examine the strategies and best practices employed by academic institutions to
address the identified challenges and capitalize on the opportunities.
9
d) Provide recommendations for improving leadership succession planning practices in
academic services and administration departments.
5. Research Methodology
The research methodology for analyzing the challenges and opportunities of leadership
succession planning in academic services and administration departments adopts a
comprehensive and rigorous approach. This section provides an elaborate description
of the research design, data collection methods, data analysis techniques, and ethical
considerations employed in the study.
1. Research Design:
To address the research objectives, a mixed-methods research design will be utilized.
This design allows for a holistic exploration of the challenges and opportunities
associated with leadership succession planning in academic services and administration
departments. By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, the study aims to
capture a rich and nuanced understanding of the subject matter.
2. Data Collection Methods:
a) Literature Review: A thorough review of existing literature on leadership succession
planning in academic services and administration departments will be conducted.
Academic databases, scholarly articles, books, reports, and case studies will be
examined to establish a theoretical framework, identify key themes, and gain insights
into the challenges and opportunities in the field.
b) Interviews: Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with key stakeholders,
including senior administrators, current leaders, and potential successors in academic
services and administration departments. These interviews will provide valuable
qualitative data on their experiences, perspectives, and practices related to leadership
succession planning. The interview questions will be carefully designed to explore the
challenges faced by organizations, the strategies employed in succession planning, and
the opportunities recognized by stakeholders.
10
c) Surveys: Online surveys will be administered to a broader sample of academic
professionals who hold leadership positions or aspire to leadership roles within
academic services and administration departments. The surveys will collect quantitative
data on participants' attitudes towards succession planning, perceptions of
organizational support, and opinions on specific challenges and opportunities. The
survey questions will be developed based on the findings from the literature review and
interviews.
d) Case Studies: In-depth case studies will be conducted in selected academic
institutions known for their successful leadership succession planning practices. The
case studies will involve interviews with key stakeholders, document analysis, and
observations of organizational practices. These case studies will provide a deeper
understanding of the strategies, policies, and approaches employed by these institutions
and offer valuable insights into effective practices.
3. Data Analysis Techniques:
a) Thematic Analysis: Qualitative data from interviews, literature review, and case
studies will be analyzed using thematic analysis. This involves identifying recurring
themes, patterns, and categories in the data to derive meaningful insights about the
challenges and opportunities of leadership succession planning. Codes will be assigned
to segments of the data, and these codes will be grouped into themes and sub-themes,
allowing for a systematic analysis of the qualitative data.
b) Statistical Analysis: Quantitative data from the surveys will be analyzed using
appropriate statistical techniques. Descriptive statistics will be employed to summarize
survey responses, and inferential statistics may be used to examine relationships and
associations between variables. This analysis will provide quantitative insights into
participants' attitudes, perceptions, and levels of support related to leadership succession
planning.
c) Comparative Analysis: A comparative analysis will be conducted to examine the
similarities and differences in findings across different data sources (interviews,
surveys, and case studies). This analysis will help identify common challenges and
11
opportunities, highlight divergent perspectives, and provide a comprehensive view of
the research topic.
4. Ethical Considerations:
Ethical guidelines will be strictly followed throughout the research process. Informed
consent will be obtained from participants prior to their involvement in interviews and
surveys. Participants' privacy, confidentiality, and anonymity will be safeguarded by
removing any personally identifiable information from the data during analysis and
reporting. Data storage and security protocols will be implemented to protect
participants' information. Additionally, participants will have the right to withdraw from
the study at any point without any consequences.
5. Limitations:
It is important to acknowledge certain limitations of the research. The sample size for
interviews, surveys, and case studies may be limited due to resource constraints. The
generalizability of findings may be restricted to the specific context of academic
services and administration departments. However, efforts will be made to ensure
diversity within the sample to capture a range of perspectives. Moreover, the research
will transparently acknowledge these limitations and emphasize the need for further
research to enhance the understanding of leadership succession planning in academic
institutions.
6. Expected Outcomes
1. The identification of challenges and barriers in leadership succession planning is
crucial for understanding the obstacles that hinder effective succession processes. This
knowledge enables organizations to address issues such as a limited pool of talent,
resistance to change, and the need for clear succession criteria, ultimately facilitating
smoother transitions and long-term leadership development.
2. Exploring the opportunities and benefits of effective succession planning highlights
its potential to contribute to organizational success. Successful succession planning can
lead to a more robust leadership pipeline, increased diversity and inclusion, knowledge
12
transfer, and improved organizational continuity. Recognizing these opportunities
encourages organizations to invest in succession planning as a strategic advantage.
3. Analysis of strategies and best practices employed in successful succession planning
provides valuable insights into the approaches that yield positive outcomes. This
includes activities such as identifying high-potential candidates, implementing
mentorship programs, offering targeted leadership development initiatives, and
conducting comprehensive assessments. Understanding these strategies helps
organizations develop and refine their own succession plans.
4. Evidence-based recommendations for improving leadership succession planning are
essential for enhancing the effectiveness of these processes. By drawing on empirical
research and practical experiences, organizations can implement evidence-based
practices that address challenges, capitalize on opportunities, and enhance the overall
quality of their succession planning efforts.
5. Contribution to the existing knowledge on leadership succession planning in
academia expands the academic and practical understanding of this field. Through
rigorous research and scholarly inquiry, new insights and perspectives are generated,
deepening the collective knowledge base, and informing future practices and policies
related to leadership succession planning in academic settings.
6. The impact of effective leadership succession planning on organizational
development and long-term success is significant. Well-planned and executed
succession processes contribute to organizational stability, strategic alignment, and the
cultivation of capable leaders who can drive institutional growth, adapt to change, and
sustain positive outcomes in the long run.
7. Building robust leadership pipelines and promoting diversity and inclusion are key
outcomes of effective succession planning. By actively identifying and developing
diverse talent pools, organizations can enhance decision-making processes, foster
innovation, and create more inclusive work environments that reflect the diversity of
the student body and society.
13
8. Enhancing organizational continuity and strategic alignment is a vital benefit of
succession planning. Through intentional leadership development, organizations can
ensure smooth transitions, maintain institutional memory, and align leadership with the
organization's vision, mission, and strategic goals, leading to consistent progress and
effective governance.
9. Guiding decision-making processes in academic institutions is an important role of
succession planning. By having a well-defined and transparent succession process,
organizations can make informed decisions about leadership appointments, promotions,
and professional development opportunities, thereby increasing fairness, accountability,
and confidence in the selection and development of leaders.
10. Informing future research and scholarly inquiry in the field is a crucial outcome of
studying leadership succession planning. The insights gained from current research and
practical experiences can identify gaps in knowledge, highlight emerging trends, and
shape the direction of future research inquiries, contributing to the continuous
improvement and evolution of succession planning practices in academia.
7. Requirements / resources
1. A PC with at least intel i5 processor and 8GB RAM
2. Access to the Internet
3. Google Suite to generate documents, PDFs, surveys, and spreadsheets
4. Primary data (to be collected)
5. Secondary data (available on SDG Action Manager website)
6. Additional tools such as Grammarly, Mendeley and Turnitin
8. Research Plan
The research plan consists of several key activities with specific start and end dates:
1. Topics Selection & Literature Review (01-05-2023 - 11-05-2023):
During this phase, the researcher will select the research topic and conduct a thorough
literature review. Relevant academic sources and scholarly articles will be reviewed to
gain a comprehensive understanding of leadership succession planning in academic
services and administration.
14
2. Thesis Topic Submission (12-05-2023 - 16-05-2023):
The researcher will submit the finalized research topic to the advisor or committee for
approval.
3. Background Study (17-05-2023 - 27-05-2023):
This phase involves conducting an in-depth background study to establish a strong
foundation for the research. It will involve exploring the historical context, theoretical
frameworks, and previous studies related to leadership succession planning.
4. Literature Review (28-05-2023 - 07-06-2023):
The researcher will conduct an extensive review of the literature, focusing on the
challenges and opportunities of leadership succession planning in academic services and
administration. Key themes, best practices, and gaps in the existing literature will be
identified.
5. Proposal Submission (08-06-2023 - 21-06-2023):
The researcher will prepare and submit a research proposal outlining the research
objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes to the advisor or committee for
approval.
6. Data Collection (22-06-2023 - 12-07-2023):
Data collection will be conducted through various methods such as interviews, surveys,
and document analysis. Key stakeholders including senior administrators and
department heads will be interviewed, and surveys will be administered to assess current
succession planning practices.
7. Data Analysis (13-07-2023 - 28-07-2023):
Collected data will be analysed using appropriate qualitative or quantitative analysis
techniques. The researcher will identify patterns, themes, and challenges in the data and
draw meaningful conclusions.
8. Documentation of Analysis (29-07-2023 - 09-08-2023):
The analysis findings will be documented, organized, and presented in a clear and
concise manner. The researcher will create visual representations, tables, and charts to
enhance the presentation of the data analysis.
9. Conclusion (10-08-2023 - 25-08-2023):
Based on the analysis, the researcher will draw conclusions regarding the challenges
and opportunities of leadership succession planning in academic services and
administration departments.
10. Interim Report Writing (26-08-2023 - 10-09-2023):
15
The researcher will write an interim report, summarizing the research findings,
conclusions, and recommendations for further action.
11. Interim Report Submission (11-09-2023):
The interim report will be submitted to the advisor or committee for review and
feedback.
12. Final Report Writing (12-09-2023 - 09-10-2023):
The researcher will compile the final report, incorporating the feedback received, and
provide a detailed analysis of the challenges and opportunities identified in the research.
13. Final Report Submission (10-10-2023):
The final research report will be submitted by the specified deadline.
References
• Chandler, D., & Henricks, M. (2014). Leadership succession planning in higher
education: A review of the literature. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 14-25.
• Kim, M., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2020). Factors influencing leadership succession
planning in higher education institutions: A case study of a Korean university.
Higher Education, 79(3), 529-547.
• Ming, J. (2016). Leadership succession planning in higher education: A case study
of a Chinese university. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 243-257.
16
• Dall'Ora, C., Cooper, D. J., & Griffiths, M. (2017). Leadership succession planning
in higher education: An institutional perspective. Higher Education Quarterly,
71(3), 249-267.
• Gephart, R. P., Marsick, V. J., & Van Buren, M. E. (2012). Developing leaders: A
guide to succession planning and talent management. Jossey-Bass.
• Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. (2011). The workforce scorecard: Managing
human capital to execute strategy. Harvard Business Press.
• Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2015). Leadership succession and talent management
in higher education. Springer.
• Smith, L., & Johnson, M. (2019). Leadership Succession Planning in Higher
Education Institutions: Challenges and Strategies. Journal of Higher Education
Management, 38(3), 45-62.
• Chen, T., et al. (2020). The Impact of Leadership Succession Planning on
Organizational Performance: A Case Study of Academic Administration in
Universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7), 1541-1557.
• Brown, T., & Wilson, K. (2018). Developing Future Leaders: A Best Practices
Guide for Academic Services and Administration Departments. Journal of
Academic Administration in Higher Education, 14(4), 79-96.
• Brown, T., Wilson, K. S., & Smith, R. (2021). Developing Leaders in Higher
Education: Exploring the Role of Leadership Development Programs. Journal of
Leadership Education, 20(2), 54-69.
• Kellerman, B., & Peiperl, M. (2021). The succession paradox: How the right
successors undermine the leadership pipeline. Harvard Business Review, 99(2),
130-139.
• Bardoel, E. A., Harris, N., & Wood, D. (2020). Navigating succession in higher
education institutions: Insights from leadership transitions. Journal of Higher
Education Policy and Management, 42(6), 625-640.
• DiGravio, G., & Donlevy, J. (2019). Leadership succession planning in higher
education: A qualitative case study. Journal of Leadership Studies, 13(4), 70-84.
17
