Universidad autónoma de Nuevo León

Facultad de derecho y criminología

PIA

TERMINOLOGÍA JURÍDICA EN INGLÉS

5to semestre

Grupo:0G1/303

Alumnos:
Cynthia Michelle Chacon Garcia 2048952
Melanie Alejandra Meza cruz 2060024
Mariana Janeth Pérez Meza 2039007
José Enrique garcia collazo 2051163
Erick Gael Vazquez Carlos 2056231

San Nicolás de los Garza, Ciudad Universitaria, 22 de noviembre del 2024

1
Video link: https://youtu.be/LceBhxui8gc?si=HFQy-EFf3s4BIM3i

Part of José Enrique garcia collazo

Legal Insights Live - Guión

Good evening, everyone, and welcome to Legal Insights Live. I'm your host, Jose Enrique
Garcia Collazo, and tonight we're diving into a fascinating legal landscape with stories that
challenge our understanding of justice, responsibility, and the consequences of
MISCONDUCT.
To start, we'll hand it over to my colleagues, who are about to bring us an exclusive
interview. They'll examine a case involving potential LIABILITY, CULPABILITY, and what
some may see as a DELIBERATE act of HARM TO A PERSON. Let's hear what they uncover.
[Fascinating insights from our team!] Cases like these often raise questions about LEGAL
ACTION and the PROOF required to establish DAMAGES. Whether the actions were
UNSAFE or an act of NUISANCE, they demonstrate how vital PRECAUTIONS are in avoiding
legal disputes.
Now, for a change of pace, we've got something... unexpected. A mysterious individual has
shared a song with us, though we're not entirely sure who he is. But hey, legal matters
aside, let's take a moment to enjoy some music!
[Musical performance plays]
That was... something, wasn't it? Now, let's get back to the complexities of legal principles.
When discussing issues like DUTY OF CARE, HAZARDOUS conditions, or RESTITUTION, it's
clear that the law seeks not only to resolve DISPUTES but to balance fairness and
accountability.
To wrap up, let me introduce our final guest, someone who has explored the impact of
DEFAMATION and ALTERNATIVE ways to seek justice. Let's hear her perspective.

[Final guest segment plays]

And that's all for tonight on Legal Insights Live. Thank you for joining us as we navigate the
intersection of law and life. Until next time, remember: every choice carries LEGAL
RESPONSIBILITY. Good night!

Part of Melanie Alejandra Meza cruz y Cynthia Michelle Chacon García

Reporter Melanie : Good evening. Could you explain how the arrest of
the perpetrator was achieved?

Interviewee Cynthia : Of course. The arrest was made possible through the collection
of direct evidence, such as fingerprints found on a key object at the crime scene and
a bloodstain that was analyzed. This evidence allowed authorities to file formal
charges and proceed with the suspect’s detention.

2
Reporter melanie : Was there also any circumstantial evidenceinvolved in this case?
Interviewee Michelle: Absolutely. In addition to the physical evidence, the case was
strengthened by circumstantial elements, including phone records, fiber traces found on
the suspect’s clothing, and tire marks matching their vehicle. These elements helped
to corroborate the main findings.

Reporter Melanie : How was the chain of custody maintained to ensure that
the evidence was admissible in court?

Interviewee Michelle : The chain of custody is a critical procedure in cases like this. All
collected items, from biological samples to video recordings, were properly labeled and
stored under strict security measures to prevent them from being tampered with or
challenged during trial. This ensured that all evidence was
deemed competent and relevant.

Reporter Melanie : What happened during the arraignment or reading of charges?

Interviewee Michelle: During the arraignment, the charges were formally read to the
suspect. They had the opportunity to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. The suspect
chose to plead “not guilty,” which initiated the judicial process.

Reporter Melanie : Has the defendant attempted to negotiate a plea deal, or have they
expressed an intention to file an appeal?

Interviewee Michelle : Initially, the defense proposed a plea dealseeking to reduce the
possible sentence. However, the prosecution rejected this offer due to the severity of the
crime. If convicted, the defendant will likely face a prison term in a penitentiary, along
with potential fines and community service.

Reporter Melanie : What kind of expert witnesses participated in this case?

Interviewee Michelle: Several individuals were called as expert witnesses. A forensic

analyst focused on biological evidence, such as DNA extracted from the bloodstain, while
a ballistics expert examined a firearm found at the scene to link it to the crime.
Additionally, a criminal psychologist provided insights into the suspect’s profile.

Reporter melanie : What role did the victim play in building the case?

3
Interviewee Michelle : The victim provided a detailed testimony that served as a key piece
of testimonial evidence. This testimony helped to strengthen the prosecution’s theory of
the caseand support their assertion of the suspect’s guilt.
Reporter melanie : Were there any challenges regarding the admissibility of the evidence?

Interviewee Michelle : The defense filed motions to exclude certain pieces of evidence,
arguing that they were based on hearsay and therefore not probative. However, the
prosecution is confident that the remaining evidence, both physical and testimonial, will
suffice to secure a conviction.

Reporter Melanie : Finally, what are the next steps in the case?

Interviewee Michelle : We are currently in the pretrial motions stage, where both parties
are determining which elements will be presented at trial. Final hearings are expected to
decide whether key evidence, including surveillance footage, will be admitted. If there are
no delays, the case will proceed to trial soon.

Reporter Melanie : Thank you very much for your statements.

Interviewee Michelle : Thank you

In conclusion - melanie
The arrest and accusation of the suspect highlight the importance of competent
representation and meticulous procedures in criminal justice. The material evidence and
circumstantial findings demonstrate the strength of the case.
Although the defense attempted to demonstrate faultand limit the evidence, the
prosecution defended its position with a solid chain of custody and expert testimony. The
suspect’s criminal record could influence the trial.
The material evidence will be key to uncovering the truth and achieving justice.

T((he videos were recorded and presented separately to save time)

4
Part of Erick Gael Vazques Carlos
"Oh yes, I've been convicted, it's all quite true,
But blame the bureaucracy, not the things I do!
In that messy arraignment, I caused a wild tort,
I twist the law like a sport, and never get caught!

The clerk looked confused, lost my mind in the files,

But hey, I’ve been causing defamation for miles!
My liability's high, I've caused plenty of harm,
But compensation? Ha! I just turn on the charm.

With lawsuits galore and negligence too,

I’m the king of misconduct—you all know it's true.
When it comes to qualification, I'm lacking a bit,
But I can bluff through negotiations, I never submit.

We try to resolve all the damage I've done,

But compliance with rules? That’s no fun!
Those interrogatories? I answered in jest,
Turning every question into a comedy fest.

I've ignored every rule about safety and law,

Left a trail of destruction that dropped every jaw.
So let's talk compensation for all that I’ve wrecked,
But trust me, the harm? It’s what you'd expect!

Sure, there's damage—I’ve broken a few,

But hey, I'm just here to entertain you!
I’ve turned this courtroom into my show,
Because a life of chaos is all I know!"

5
Part of mariana Janeth Pérez Meza

Part 1: Jury Duty – AKA The Call to Civic Awkwardness

“So, you’ve been summoned for jury duty. Congratulations! You’ve won an all-expenses-
paid trip to… sitting in
a roomwith strangers all day. Woohoo! But don’t worry, it’s yourchance to play a real-
life episode of Law & Order… minusthe theme song.”
“The clerk of the court will guide you through the day, kind of like the host
of this awkward civic party. If you’reselected for a
case, buckle up, because now you’re part of the proceeding.
And what does that mean? Well, the defense—the side trying to prove their client didn’t d
o it—will try to convince you. The prosecution? They’re basically saying,
‘Oh, they totally did it!’ Your job? Figure out the truth. No pressure!”

Part 2: The Court Process – A Soap Opera, but with Legal Terms
“Alright, let’s talk about the court process.
Picture this: someone’s been charged with a crime.
Drama already, right? Before the trial starts, both sides enter the discovery phase. It’s like
a game of show-and-
tell, except they’re swappingevidence instead of cool toys. During the pre-trial hearing, th
e lawyers argue about stuff like,
‘Can we use thisevidence?’ or ‘Can we suppress this witness’s TikTokvideo?’”
“If the defendant’s lucky, they might snag a plea bargain—a deal to avoid trial by pleading
guilty to a lesser charge. No deal? Then it’s trial time, baby!
At the end, they’re eithersentenced (bad news) or acquitted (cue the happy dance). But w
hat happens if the jury can’t agree? That’s a hung jury.
And if things really go off the rails? You’ve got a mistrial. Think of it like hitting the reset b
utton on your favorite legal drama.”

Part 3: Courtroom Etiquette – Look Sharp, Play Nice

“Now, let’s talk etiquette—because the courtroom isn’t justfor dramatic objections, it’s a
place of protocol. First thingsfirst: when the judge enters, it’s all rise! This isn’t optional,
folks. It’s like a fancy legal version of standing for thenational anthem.”

6
“When you’re called to testify, you’ll be sworn in. Thatmeans you’re now under oath, whi
ch is like a pinky. And breaking that oath? That’s called perjury, and trust
me, youdon’t want to go there.”

“Also, don’t interrupt! Judges hate that. If you need to speak, address them as
‘Your Honor.’ Want to talk to themprivately? Ask
to approach the bench. But whatever you do, stay out of the well—that’s the space in fro
nt of the judge. It’s like a VIP area

“And when the judge says,

‘We’re going off the record,’ that’s your cue to breathe, but don’t get too comfy—legal
drama waits for no one.”