Lecture No 5 Complete Notes
Lecture No 5 Complete Notes
Complete Notes
The Lahore Resolution, also known as the Pakistan Resolution, was a formal political statement adopted
by the All-India Muslim League at its session on 23rd March 1940, in Lahore. Proposed by A.K. Fazlul
Huq and backed by prominent leaders such as Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the resolution called for the creation
of independent states for Muslims in the north-western and eastern zones of India, where Muslims were in
the majority. This marked a significant shift in the League's policy, from seeking safeguards for Muslims
within a united India to advocating for a separate Muslim homeland. The Lahore Resolution laid the
foundation for the demand for Pakistan, galvanizing the Muslim population and significantly altering the
subcontinent's political landscape, ultimately leading to the partition of India in 1947.
Background
The Lahore Resolution has to be understood against the backdrop of mounting communal tensions
between Hindus and Muslims in British India. Several factors contributed to this estrangement:
o Marginalization of Muslims: Following the decline of the Mughal Empire, India's Muslims felt
increasingly excluded, both politically and economically, by a largely Hindu-dominated British
Indian administration.
o Separate Electorates: Separate electorates for Muslims were introduced by the British in 1909
and reinforced communal differences.
o Political Movements: All-India Muslim League was established in 1906 as an organization that
integrated growing concern for the political future of Muslims within this subcontinent.
o Two-Nation Theory: Thinkers like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan emphasized religion as a primary factor
of identity and put forward that Hindus and Muslims are two different nations.
o Congress-Muslim League Rift: Uneasy relations between Congress and the Muslim League,
marked by the exclusion of the League from ministry-making in many provinces after the 1937
elections, contributed to growing communal tension.
o Failed Attempts at Compromise: Efforts to mediate between the two communities, such as the
Nehru Report (1928) and the Round Table Conferences (1930-32), failed to resolve Hindu-Muslim
disputes.
The Lahore Session, dated March 22 to March 23, 1940, is one of the milestone events in the history of
the All-India Muslim League. The salient features of this session were as follows:
o Leadership and Strategy: The League explicitly put forth its demand for a separate land for the
Muslims under the undisputed leadership of Muhammad Ali Jinnah to safeguard the political and
cultural interests of the Muslims.
o Statement of Jinnah: Jinnah expressed the impossibility of Muslims living together with the
Hindus in a majority Indian set-up and said that "Hindus and Muslims are two different
civilizations."
o Support and Discussions: Delegates from all Muslim-majority provinces endorsed their support,
which paved the way for a single demand for separate states.
o The Indian National Congress: Congress flatly rejected the resolution, terming it a move aimed
at dividing the country and contradicting their dream of an undivided India.
o Muslim Reception: In the Muslim community, particularly in the proposed regions, it received
robust support by validating the quest among them for a separate nation.
o British Government: The Britisher were already under attacked of by World War II pressures,
read the resolution as yet another complication in their handling of Indian affairs. They adopted
a cautious approach, keen to preempt any escalation in communal violence.
o Public and Press: Domestic and international press opinion, like that of individual commentators
both inside and outside India, was sharply divided, ranging from unequivocal denunciations to
thoughtful sanctions of the principle of self-determination.
o Foundation of Pakistan: Clearly, it laid down the demand for Pakistan as the foremost goal of the
Muslim League, culminating in the actual creation of Pakistan on August 14, 1947.
o Widening Communal Divide: This deepened further the already existing Hindu-Muslim divide, a
consequence post which communal riots and social disorder increased.
o British Policy: The realization of the complexity of the Indian political scene made them rethink
strategies and finally accept, in the Mountbatten Plan (1947), partition.
o Regional Security: Massive migrations and violence ensued, regional stability, and security were
affected.
o Legacies and Narratives: The resolution remains a subject of intense historiographical debates,
influencing academic and political narratives around nationalism and partition.
The Interim Constitution of 1947 of Pakistan was a temporary legal framework adopted by Pakistan
after it gained independence on August 14, 1947, following the partition of British India. It was a
crucial document for governing Pakistan during its early years, as the country navigated the transition
to a fully-fledged constitution. The Interim Constitution was in effect from August 14, 1947, until
March 23, 1956, when the first Constitution of Pakistan was adopted.
Purpose:
The purpose of the Interim Constitution was to provide a temporary legal framework that would allow
the country to function as a new sovereign state while the final constitution was being drafted. It was
also designed to facilitate the establishment of governmental structures and systems, including the
establishment of the Constituent Assembly, which would ultimately draft the full constitution.
The Interim Constitution of 1947 was superseded by the Constitution of Pakistan on March 23, 1956,
which formally declared Pakistan as a Republic. This constitution established Pakistan as a
parliamentary republic and defined the powers of the President and the Prime Minister, replacing the
office of the Governor-General with that of the President.
Ghulam Muhammad Sayeed, the Hindu representative from Sindh, was the only
one who voted against the resolution. His objections were based on concerns about
the safeguarding of minority rights and the Islamic character of the state, as he
believed that the resolution could potentially undermine the position of non-
Muslims in Pakistan.
o Foundation for Political Debate: The Objective Resolution has also sparked
debate and discussion on the role of religion in politics. While it set the
foundation for the country’s identity as an Islamic state, the practical
application of Islamic principles in governance has remained a complex and
often contentious issue in Pakistan's history.