0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views7 pages

Addressing Inequalities in Malaria Research Funding: Insights From Rural Uganda (WWW - Kiu.ac - Ug)

The document discusses the disparities in malaria research funding in Uganda, particularly affecting rural communities that bear the highest disease burden. It highlights the urban-centric focus of funding, challenges faced by local researchers, and the need for equitable investment in rural malaria research. The review calls for a rethinking of funding frameworks to ensure that rural areas receive adequate support for malaria prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, emphasizing the importance of locally-driven interventions.

Uploaded by

publication1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views7 pages

Addressing Inequalities in Malaria Research Funding: Insights From Rural Uganda (WWW - Kiu.ac - Ug)

The document discusses the disparities in malaria research funding in Uganda, particularly affecting rural communities that bear the highest disease burden. It highlights the urban-centric focus of funding, challenges faced by local researchers, and the need for equitable investment in rural malaria research. The review calls for a rethinking of funding frameworks to ensure that rural areas receive adequate support for malaria prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, emphasizing the importance of locally-driven interventions.

Uploaded by

publication1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

https://www.inosr.

net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo

INOSR Scientific Research 12(1):32-38, 2025. ISSN: 2705-1706


©INOSR PUBLICATIONS INOSRSR121.3238
International Network Organization for Scientific Research
https://doi.org/10.59298/INOSRSR/2025/12.1.323800

Addressing Inequalities in Malaria Research Funding: Insights


from Rural Uganda
Bwensiyo Twebaza H.
Faculty of Science and Technology Kampala International University Uganda

ABSTRACT
Malaria remains a major public health issue in Uganda, with rural areas experiencing the highest disease burden.
However, disparities in malaria research funding contribute to inequities in addressing the disease, particularly in
underserved rural communities. This review explores the inequalities in the allocation of malaria research funding
in Uganda, examining the origins and impacts of these disparities and proposing potential solutions. Key issues
highlighted include the urban-centric focus of research priorities, the challenges faced by local researchers, and the
need for equitable investment in rural malaria research. The review emphasizes the importance of locally-driven,
context-specific interventions, and calls for a rethinking of global and national funding frameworks to ensure that
rural communities receive adequate support for malaria prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Addressing these
funding disparities is crucial for improving malaria outcomes and promoting health equity across Uganda.
Keywords: Malaria, Research Funding, Rural Uganda, Health Inequities, Public Health.

INTRODUCTION
Malaria remains one of the most significant public However, the distribution and efficacy of these
health challenges in Uganda, contributing to high interventions remain uneven. While urban centers
morbidity and mortality rates, particularly among benefit from better healthcare infrastructure,
vulnerable populations such as children under five sustained funding, and access to information, rural
and pregnant women [1]. The disease is caused by and remote areas face persistent challenges. These
Plasmodium parasites transmitted through the bites include limited healthcare facilities, understaffed and
of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes, with under-resourced medical personnel, and socio-
Plasmodium falciparum being the most prevalent cultural barriers to seeking care. Additionally,
species in Uganda. Uganda’s tropical climate, environmental factors such as proximity to water
abundant mosquito breeding sites, and socio- bodies, agricultural practices, and deforestation
economic disparities exacerbate the malaria burden, further contribute to sustained malaria transmission
especially in rural communities where access to in these regions [5]. Despite decades of
healthcare and preventive measures is limited. This interventions, malaria continues to strain the
challenge persists despite ongoing global and healthcare system, impede economic growth, and
national efforts aimed at reducing malaria perpetuate cycles of poverty. A key challenge is the
transmission and its associated impacts [2]. disparity in research funding and attention, with
Malaria’s burden in Uganda is both widespread and resources often directed toward high-profile
deeply entrenched, making it a critical focus of health international projects or urban-centric initiatives. As
initiatives. The country accounts for a significant a result, rural communities—where the burden is
proportion of global malaria cases and deaths, heaviest—are left underrepresented in research and
positioning it among the highest malaria burden under-resourced in interventions [6]. This
countries in sub-Saharan Africa [3]. The World disconnect underscores the need for more inclusive
Health Organization (WHO) and the Uganda and equitable approaches to malaria control,
Ministry of Health have implemented numerous emphasizing localized and context-specific strategies.
strategies to combat malaria, including the The persistence of malaria in Uganda, particularly in
distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs), rural areas, highlights a critical gap in the fight
indoor residual spraying (IRS), and the scaling up of against the disease [7]. While significant progress
diagnostic and treatment services [4]. has been made globally to reduce malaria incidence,

32
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://www.inosr.net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo
rural communities in Uganda continue to bear the stability in rural communities. Equity and inclusion
brunt of the disease due to systemic inequities. These are also important aspects of the study. By
inequities manifest in limited access to healthcare prioritizing the needs of rural communities, it
services, inadequate preventive measures, and contributes to a more inclusive approach to public
insufficient allocation of resources for research and health, ensuring no population is left behind in the
intervention in rural settings. The focus on urban fight against malaria. Policymakers, healthcare
areas and large-scale international initiatives has practitioners, and development partners can use the
inadvertently marginalized the very communities findings to advocate for more equitable resource
that are most affected by malaria [8]. Furthermore, allocation, increased funding for rural health
the socio-economic impacts of malaria in rural initiatives, and the development of context-specific
Uganda are profound. Frequent episodes of illness strategies. Malaria control is directly linked to
lead to loss of productivity, increased healthcare several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),
expenses, and a diminished quality of life [9]. including Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and
Children are often unable to attend school due to Goal 10 (Reduced Inequalities), aligning with global
repeated infections, perpetuating cycles of poverty efforts to achieve these goals by addressing health
and limited opportunity. Pregnant women face disparities and promoting sustainable, community-
increased risks of complications, including maternal driven solutions.
anemia, low birth weight, and neonatal deaths, which Malaria Burden in Rural Uganda
further burden families and healthcare systems. Malaria is a significant public health issue in rural
Existing malaria control strategies have not Uganda, with high transmission rates globally. It
adequately addressed these challenges, partly due to disproportionately affects vulnerable groups,
limited data on the specific needs and conditions of including children under five and pregnant women,
rural communities [2]. Without targeted and who face severe health risks such as anemia, low birth
equitable interventions, efforts to eliminate malaria in weight, and increased mortality rates [11]. The
Uganda will remain incomplete and ineffective. burden of malaria in these areas is attributed to a
Addressing these systemic gaps requires a deliberate combination of environmental, socioeconomic, and
focus on rural communities, where interventions can healthcare-related factors. Limited access to
be tailored to the unique socio-cultural and healthcare, inadequate vector control measures,
environmental contexts [10]. socioeconomic challenges, and favorable climatic
The study aims to address the need for equitable conditions contribute to the disease's burden. Long
malaria control strategies in Uganda by identifying distances to clinics and poor transportation
and analyzing key socio-economic and environmental infrastructure hinder timely access to diagnosis and
factors contributing to the high burden of malaria in treatment. Inadequate vector control measures, such
rural areas. It evaluates the effectiveness of current as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and indoor
malaria control interventions, explores barriers to residual spraying (IRS), are inconsistent in rural
accessing healthcare services for malaria prevention, areas, and high levels of poverty limit households'
diagnosis, and treatment in rural areas, and proposes ability to purchase ITNs or access preventive
localized and context-specific strategies for reducing measures. Socioeconomic challenges, such as poverty
malaria transmission and improving healthcare and low levels of education, contribute to the malaria
outcomes in underserved communities. The study burden. Poor living conditions, agricultural practices,
holds significant importance in the broader context of and favorable climatic conditions sustain mosquito
public health, social equity, and sustainable breeding and malaria transmission [12]. Research
development in Uganda. By focusing on rural and funding gaps in rural-focused malaria research
communities, the research addresses a critical gap in limit understanding of specific challenges, such as
the fight against malaria, ensuring that interventions insecticide resistance patterns, community
are inclusive and impactful. The findings of this study compliance with prevention measures, and
have the potential to inform policy decisions, guide sociocultural factors influencing health-seeking
resource allocation, and improve the design and behaviors. To address these issues, Uganda should
implementation of malaria control programs. Public improve healthcare access, enhance vector control
health impacts include providing insights into programs, involve local leaders in malaria control
effective strategies for reducing malaria transmission, initiatives, and increase research investment.
improving health outcomes, and reducing the disease Disparities in Malaria Research Funding
burden. Economic benefits include cost-effective The funding of malaria research is pivotal in driving
solutions that minimize the financial burden on innovations and interventions to combat this
affected families, leading to increased productivity, devastating disease [13]. However, significant
reduced healthcare expenses, and enhanced economic disparities exist in how resources are allocated,
33
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://www.inosr.net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo
leading to gaps in addressing the needs of balanced approach that considers both global
communities most affected by malaria. Below is an innovation and local relevance. Empowering local
expanded discussion on the key areas of concern: researchers, decentralizing resources, and
Global vs. Local Research Priorities: International prioritizing community-specific needs in funding
funding agencies play a major role in shaping the decisions are essential steps toward a more equitable
focus of malaria research in Uganda. These agencies and effective malaria research landscape in Uganda
often prioritize large-scale, high-tech solutions, such [7].
as vaccine development, gene-editing technologies, or Barriers to Equitable Research Funding
advanced diagnostic tools. While these innovations Equitable research funding is crucial for ensuring
are critical, they may not address the immediate needs that all regions, especially rural areas, benefit from
of rural communities [14]. For instance, rural areas development, innovation, and knowledge production.
often struggle with basic access to mosquito nets, However, several barriers hinder access to equitable
proper drainage systems, and healthcare funding, particularly in rural Uganda, where these
infrastructure to handle malaria cases. However, challenges are most pronounced. Addressing these
these localized and practical interventions are barriers is essential for fostering inclusive research
frequently overlooked in favor of projects with environments and promoting social and economic
broader global appeal. This misalignment in development across the country.
priorities can result in interventions that are less Lack of Local Capacity: One of the major obstacles
impactful in regions where malaria burden is highest. to equitable research funding in rural Uganda is the
Urban Bias in Resource Allocation: Research lack of local capacity. Many rural areas are
institutions and laboratories in Uganda are underserved in terms of trained researchers, research
predominantly concentrated in urban centers, such as facilities, and infrastructure [17]. This limited local
Kampala and other large cities. This urban bias leads expertise and capacity make it difficult to design,
to a centralization of resources, expertise, and implement, and manage research projects effectively.
funding, creating a research gap that Without adequately trained personnel, it becomes
disproportionately affects rural areas [15]. Rural challenging to attract competitive funding from
communities often face unique challenges, such as national or international funding bodies, which often
limited healthcare access, poor sanitation, and prioritize regions with established research
cultural practices that can influence malaria institutions and skilled professionals. Furthermore,
transmission and control. The lack of representation rural researchers may lack access to modern
in research studies means that interventions equipment, data collection tools, or sufficient
developed in urban contexts may not be suitable or laboratory space, which undermines their ability to
effective in rural settings. Furthermore, the conduct high-quality research. This cycle of
geographical disparity hinders rural researchers' underdevelopment limits their opportunities to apply
ability to collaborate or access the resources needed for or receive funding, thus exacerbating regional
for locally-relevant studies. disparities in research opportunities.
Dependence on External Funding: Uganda’s Bureaucratic and Logistical Challenges:
malaria research heavily relies on international Bureaucratic red tape and logistical barriers further
donors and organizations such as the World Health inhibit equitable access to research funding in rural
Organization (WHO), the Global Fund, and private areas. The process of applying for research grants
philanthropic foundations [16]. While this funding is often involves complex documentation, numerous
invaluable, the dependence on external sources procedural steps, and strict requirements, all of which
creates constraints for local researchers. can be overwhelming for researchers without
International donors often set research agendas based sufficient administrative support. In rural Uganda,
on their strategic interests, which may not align with these challenges are compounded by poor access to
Uganda's specific needs. Projects focusing on rural information, limited connectivity to national funding
and community-specific solutions are often sidelined networks, and the lack of dedicated research support
in favor of initiatives with higher visibility or global staff. Additionally, logistical difficulties such as poor
appeal. This dependence undermines local road infrastructure, limited transportation options,
researchers' autonomy, leaving many promising and unreliable electricity can prevent researchers
rural-focused ideas unfunded or underdeveloped. from fully engaging with funding opportunities [18].
Additionally, the focus on securing competitive This bureaucratic burden disproportionately affects
international grants can divert attention from rural researchers, as they may lack the resources to
smaller-scale projects that have the potential to navigate the application processes effectively.
deliver immediate and sustainable results in high- Consequently, even when funding opportunities are
burden areas. Addressing these disparities requires a available, many rural applicants may be discouraged
34
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://www.inosr.net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo
from applying due to these procedural and logistical may lack access to modern equipment, data collection
barriers. tools, or sufficient laboratory space, which
Limited Representation in Decision-Making: The undermines their ability to conduct high-quality
absence of rural community representatives in research [27, 28, 29]. Bureaucratic and logistical
funding allocation discussions is another significant challenges further inhibit equitable access to research
barrier [19]. Research funding decisions are often funding in rural areas. The process of applying for
made by committees or panels located in urban research grants often involves complex
centers, and these bodies may not have an adequate documentation, numerous procedural steps, and strict
understanding of the unique needs, challenges, and requirements, which can be overwhelming for
opportunities in rural areas. This lack of researchers without sufficient administrative support
representation leads to a disconnect between funding [30, 31]. In rural Uganda, these challenges are
priorities and the actual needs of rural communities. compounded by poor access to information, limited
As a result, research projects that are funded may not connectivity to national funding networks, and the
be relevant to local issues or may overlook the specific lack of dedicated research support staff. Lastly, the
contexts and concerns of rural populations. absence of rural community representatives in
Furthermore, the lack of input from rural decision-making leads to a disconnect between
representatives perpetuates inequities, as funding funding priorities and the actual needs of rural
may be disproportionately directed to urban-based communities. This results in research projects that
institutions or research projects that have little may not be relevant to local issues or overlook the
practical impact on rural development. Ensuring that specific contexts and concerns of rural populations.
rural voices are represented in decision-making Ensuring that rural voices are represented in
processes is crucial for aligning research priorities decision-making processes is crucial for aligning
with the real-world challenges faced by rural research priorities with the real-world challenges
communities, ultimately fostering more relevant and faced by rural communities and fostering more
impactful research initiatives. relevant and impactful research initiatives.
Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted Strategies to Address Funding Inequalities
approach that includes building local research To address funding inequalities, several strategies
capacity, streamlining funding application processes, can be implemented. Strengthening local research
improving infrastructure, and ensuring the inclusion capacity, particularly in rural areas, is crucial for
of rural voices in research funding discussions. Only reducing disparities. Investment in these institutions
through these efforts can we achieve equitable and consistent funding for infrastructure, equipment,
research funding that supports sustainable and personnel can help them become self-sustaining
development and innovation across Uganda, and conduct high-quality research. Training
particularly in rural areas opportunities and partnerships with international
Barriers to Equitable Research Funding organizations can also enhance local capacity.
Equitable research funding is crucial for promoting Decentralizing research funding is another effective
sustainable development and innovation in all approach, as traditional models often prioritize urban
regions, especially rural areas in Uganda [20]. research, leaving rural areas with limited access to
However, several barriers hinder access to such resources. Involving community stakeholders in
funding, particularly in rural areas. These include the decision-making processes for funding allocation
lack of local capacity, bureaucratic and logistical ensures local needs are met and empowers rural
challenges, and the absence of rural community communities [21]. Promoting inclusive partnerships
representatives in decision-making processes [21, 22, between global and local researchers is essential for
23]. Local capacity refers to the lack of trained bridging gaps in expertise, resources, and knowledge.
researchers, research facilities, and infrastructure in This can lead to more relevant and sustainable
rural areas, which makes it difficult to design, solutions to rural challenges, reduce the knowledge
implement, and manage research projects effectively divide, and provide a platform for rural researchers to
[24, 25, 26]. This lack of expertise makes it difficult engage with the international scientific community
to attract competitive funding from national or [22]. Advocacy and policy change are also essential
international funding bodies, which often prioritize for promoting sustainable and inclusive research
regions with established research institutions and practices.
skilled professionals. Additionally, rural researchers
CONCLUSION
The review emphasizes the need to address interventions. The rural regions bear the heaviest
inequalities in malaria research funding in rural burden of malaria, yet they remain underrepresented
Uganda to ensure effective and equitable malaria in research and underfunded in terms of resources and
35
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://www.inosr.net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo
interventions. Systemic challenges faced by rural researchers, reducing bureaucratic barriers, and
communities include limited access to healthcare, creating more accessible funding processes will help
poor infrastructure, and inadequate malaria control bridge the gap in malaria research funding. Equitable
measures. The disproportionate allocation of research funding is not only a matter of social justice but also
funding, often focused on high-tech solutions or a strategic investment in effective malaria control.
urban-centric projects, marginalizes the unique needs Achieving this balance between global innovation and
of rural populations. To achieve equitable malaria local relevance will contribute to sustainable,
control, local, context-specific research is prioritized, inclusive, and impactful malaria control efforts,
empowering local researchers, improving benefiting both the most affected communities and
infrastructure, and actively including rural voices in the broader Ugandan population.
funding decisions. Strengthening the capacity of rural
REFERENCES
1. Katushabe, J., Nnyanzi, J.B., Muwanga, G.S.: BMC Health Serv Res. 22, 438 (2022).
Exploring the role of spending on malaria https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-
incidence in Uganda using the auto- 07829-2
regressive distributed lag approach. Malaria 7. Egwu, C. O., Aloke, C., Chukwu, J., Agwu,
Journal. 23, 129 (2024). A., Alum, E., Tsamesidis, I, et al. A world
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024- free of malaria: It is time for Africa to
04929-8 actively champion and take leadership of
2. Oladipo, H.J., Tajudeen, Y.A., Oladunjoye, elimination and eradication strategies. Afr
I.O., Yusuff, S.I., Yusuf, R.O., Oluwaseyi, Health Sci., 22(4):627-640 (2022). doi:
E.M., AbdulBasit, M.O., Adebisi, Y.A., El- 10.4314/ahs.v22i4.68.
Sherbini, M.S.: Increasing challenges of 8. Ahmed, S., Chase, L.E., Wagnild, J., Akhter,
malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa: N., Sturridge, S., Clarke, A., Chowdhary, P.,
Priorities for public health research and Mukami, D., Kasim, A., Hampshire, K.:
policymakers. Annals of Medicine and Community health workers and health
Surgery. 81, 104366 (2022). equity in low- and middle-income countries:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.1043 systematic review and recommendations for
66 policy and practice. International Journal for
3. Leal Filho, W., May, J., May, M., Nagy, G.J.: Equity in Health. 21, 49 (2022).
Climate change and malaria: some recent https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-
trends of malaria incidence rates and average 01615-y
annual temperature in selected sub-Saharan 9. Gorasso, V., Moyersoen, I., Van der Heyden,
African countries from 2000 to 2018. J., De Ridder, K., Vandevijvere, S.,
Malaria Journal. 22, 248 (2023). Vansteelandt, S., De Smedt, D.,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023- Devleesschauwer, B.: Health care costs and
04682-4 lost productivity costs related to excess
4. Okechukwu, P. C., Ugwu, Okwesili FC weight in Belgium. BMC Public Health. 22,
Nwodo, Parker E Joshua, Christian E Odo, 1693 (2022).
AbubakarBawa, EC Ossai, CC Adonu. Anti- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-
malaria and hematological analyses of 14105-9
ethanol leaf extract of Moringa oleifera on 10. Yu, Y., Appiah, D., Zulu, B., Adu-Poku, K.A.:
malaria infected mice International Journal of Integrating Rural Development, Education,
Pharmacy and Biological Science 3(1) 360-371 and Management: Challenges and
(2013). Strategies. Sustainability. 16, 6474 (2024).
5. Alum, E.U., Ugwu, O.P.C., Egba, S.I., Uti, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156474
D.E., Alum, B.N.: Climate Variability and 11. Mangusho, C., Mwebesa, E., Izudi, J., Aleni,
Malaria Transmission: Unraveling the M., Dricile, R., Ayiasi, R.M., Legason, I.D.:
Complex Relationship. INOSR Scientific High prevalence of malaria in pregnancy
Research11(2):16-22 among women attending antenatal care at a
(2024). https://doi.org/10.59298/INOSRS large referral hospital in northwestern
R/2024/1.1.21622 Uganda: A cross-sectional study. PLOS
6. Coombs, N.C., Campbell, D.G., Caringi, J.: A ONE. 18, e0283755 (2023).
qualitative study of rural healthcare https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283
providers’ views of social, cultural, and 755
programmatic barriers to healthcare access.
36
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://www.inosr.net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo
12. Beke, O.A.-H., Assi, S.-B., Kokrasset, A.P.H., 19. Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J.,
Dibo, K.J.D., Tanoh, M.A., Danho, M., Klímová, V.: Grants for Local Community
Remoué, F., Koudou, G.B., Poinsignon, A.: Initiatives as a Way to Increase Public
Implication of agricultural practices in the Participation of Inhabitants of Rural Areas.
micro-geographic heterogeneity of malaria Agriculture. 11, 1060 (2021).
transmission in Bouna, Côte d’Ivoire. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture111110
Malaria Journal. 22, 313 (2023). 60
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023- 20. Sowden, R., Wekhoola, A., Musasizi, D.:
04748-3 Partnerships between Uganda, Kenya, and
13. Hemingway, J., Shretta, R., Wells, T.N.C., Rwanda and the United Kingdom to address
Bell, D., Djimdé, A.A., Achee, N., Qi, G.: Sustainable Development Goal 17 for people
Tools and Strategies for Malaria Control with communication disability.
and Elimination: What Do We Need to International Journal of Speech-Language
Achieve a Grand Convergence in Malaria? Pathology. 25, 178–182 (2023).
PLoS Biol. 14, e1002380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.21
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002 43564
380 21. Adekugbe, A.P., Ibeh, C.V.: Innovating
14. Caliendo, A.M., Gilbert, D.N., Ginocchio, service delivery for underserved
C.C., Hanson, K.E., May, L., Quinn, T.C., communities: leveraging data analytics and
Tenover, F.C., Alland, D., Blaschke, A.J., program management in the U.S. context.
Bonomo, R.A., Carroll, K.C., Ferraro, M.J., International Journal of Applied Research in
Hirschhorn, L.R., Joseph, W.P., Karchmer, Social Sciences. 6, 472–487 (2024).
T., MacIntyre, A.T., Reller, L.B., Jackson, https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.986
A.F.: Better Tests, Better Care: Improved 22. Alum, E. U., Tufail, T., Agu, P. C., Akinloye,
Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases. Clin D. I., & Obaroh, I. O.: Malaria pervasiveness
Infect Dis. 57, S139–S170 (2013). in Sub-Saharan Africa: Overcoming the
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit578 scuffle. Medicine, 103(49), e40241 (2024). doi:
15. Dowhaniuk, N.: Exploring country-wide 10.1097/MD.0000000000040241. PMID:
equitable government health care facility 39654176
access in Uganda. International Journal for 23. Obeagu EI, Nimo OM, Bunu UO, Ugwu OP,
Equity in Health. 20, 38 (2021). Alum EU. Anaemia in children under five
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020- years: African perspectives. Int J Curr Res
01371-5 Biol Med. 2023;1:1-7.
16. Head, M.G., Goss, S., Gelister, Y., Alegana, 24. Alum EU, Ugwu OPC, Obeagu EI, Bot YS,
V., Brown, R.J., Clarke, S.C., Fitchett, J.R.A., Obeagu GU. Anaemia and risk factors in
Atun, R., Scott, J.A.G., Newell, M.-L., lactating mothers: A concern in Africa. Int J
Padmadas, S.S., Tatem, A.J.: Global funding Innov Appl Res. 2023;11(2):15-17.
trends for malaria research in sub-Saharan 25. Obeagu EI, Obeagu GU, Igwe MC, Alum
Africa: a systematic analysis. The Lancet EU, Ugwu OP. Men's essential roles in the
Global Health. 5, e772–e781 (2017). management of sickle cell anemia. Newport
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214- Int J Sci Exp Sci. 2023;4(2):20-29.
109X(17)30245-0 26. Obi BE, Okechukwu PU, Obeagu EI, Ifemeje
17. O’Sullivan, B., Cairns, A., Gurney, T.: JC. Antianaemic potential of aqueous leaf
Exploring how to sustain ‘place-based’ rural extract of Mucuna pruriens on Wistar albino
health academic research for informing rural rats. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci.
health systems: a qualitative investigation. 2014;3(1):707-712.
Health Research Policy and Systems. 18, 90 27. Ezekwe CI, Uzomba CR, Ugwu OPC. The
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961- effect of methanol extract of Talinum
020-00608-7 triangulare (water leaf) on the hematology
18. Okello Candiya Bongomin, G., Ntayi, J.: and some liver parameters of experimental
Mobile money adoption and usage and rats. Glob J Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;8(2):51-
financial inclusion: mediating effect of digital 60.
consumer protection. Digital Policy, 28. Alum EU, Ugwu OPC, Aja PM, Obeagu EI,
Regulation and Governance. ahead-of-print, Inya JE, Onyeije AP, Agu E, Awuchi CG.
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-01- Restorative effects of ethanolic leaf extract of
2019-0005
37
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://www.inosr.net/inosr-scientific-research/ Bwensiyo
Datura stramonium against methotrexate- cyclophosphamide-induced anaemia in
induced hematological impairments. Cogent Wistar albino rats. Eur J Appl Sci.
Food Agric. 2023;9(1):2258774. 2015;7(1):17-20. DOI:
29. Obeagu EI, Ali MM, Alum EU, Obeagu GU, 10.5829/idosi.ejas.2015.7.1.1126.
Ugwu PC, Bunu UO. An update of anaemia 31. Offor SCE, Ukpabi EN, Ogbanshi ME,
in adults with heart failure. Int Netw Org Sci Okechukwu PU, Nwali BU. The effects of
Res. 2023. Available from: ethanol leaf-extract of Anacardium occidentale
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12493/14516. on haemoglobin and packed cell volume of
30. Chukwuemeka I, Utuk GS, Ugwu OPC, albino rats. World J Altern Med. 2014;1(1):5-
Ibiam UA, Aja PM, Offor CE. The effect of 8.
ethanol leaf extract of Jatropha curcas on
some haematological parameters of

CITE AS:Bwensiyo Twebaza H.(2025). Addressing Inequalities in Malaria Research Funding:


Insights from Rural Uganda. INOSR Scientific Research 12(1):32-38.
https://doi.org/10.59298/INOSRSR/2025/12.1.323800

38
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

You might also like