(Ebook PDF) The Unfinished Nation Vol 2 8th Edition Download
(Ebook PDF) The Unfinished Nation Vol 2 8th Edition Download
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-the-unfinished-nation-
vol-2-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-the-unfinished-nation-a-
concise-history-of-the-american-people-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/the-unfinished-nation-a-concise-
history-of-the-american-people-8th-edition-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-the-unfinished-nation-a-
concise-history-of-the-american-people-9th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-the-american-people-
creating-a-nation-and-a-society-concise-edition-volume-2-8th-
edition/
Textbook of Radiology And Imaging Vol 2 8th Edition -
eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/textbook-of-radiology-and-
imaging-vol-2-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-america-the-essential-
learning-edition-vol-2-1st-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-american-history-
connecting-with-the-past-vol-2-15th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-intermediate-accounting-
vol-2-3rd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-japan-a-documentary-
history-vol-2-the-late-tokugawa-period-to-the-present/
THE
UNFINISHED
NATION
A Concise History of the
American People
Volume 2: From 1865
Eighth Edition
Alan Brinkley
Columbia University
John Giggie
University of Alabama
Andrew Huebner
University of Alabama
THE UNFINISHED NATION: A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, VOLUME 2,
EIGHTH EDITION
Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright © 2016 by McGraw-Hill
Education. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Previous editions © 2014, 2010, and 2008.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database
or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education, including, but not limited to, in
any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the
United States.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOC/DOC 1 0 9 8 7 6 5
ISBN 978-1-259-28475-5
MHID 1-259-28475-1
Senior Vice President, Products & Markets: Kurt L. Digital Product Developer: David Chodoff
Strand Director, Content Design & Delivery: Terri Schiesl
Vice President, General Manager, Products & Markets: Program Manager: Marianne Musni
Michael Ryan Content Project Managers: Susan Trentacosti,
Vice President, Content Design & Delivery: Marianne Musni, Karen Jozefowicz
Kimberly Meriwether David Buyer: Susan K. Culbertson
Managing Director: Gina Boedeker Design: David Hash
Brand Manager: Jason Seitz Content Licensing Specialists: Carrie Burger, Ann
Director, Product Development: Meghan Campbell Marie Jannette
Lead Product Developer: Rhona Robbin Cover Image: © Bettmann/Corbis; © Charles
Product Developer: Cynthia Ward Knowles/Alamy (RF)
Executive Marketing Manager: April Cole Compositor: Aptara®, Inc.
Marketing Manager: Alexandra Schultz Printer: R. R. Donnelley
Executive Market Development Manager: Stacy Ruel
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page.
Credits: Frontmatter: Page xi: The Library of Congress; p. xiii: © Photo Reproduction by Transcendental
Graphics/Getty Images; p. xvi (T): © United Artists/Photofest; (B): © Granger, NYC –All Rights Reserved.; p. xvii:
© Instituto Nazionale Luce/Alinari/Getty Images; p. xviii: © Popperfoto/Getty Images; p. xxii: © Ian Dagnall/
Alamy. Design elements: Scales: © Comstock/Jupiter Images; Phonograph: © Burke/Triolo/Brand X Pictures/
Jupiter Images; Race car: © George Doyle/Stockbyte/Getty Images (RF); Wooden top: © Image Club; Stack
of books: © D. Hurst/Alamy; American flag: © Steve Cole/Getty Images (RF); Double hemisphere map:
© Stockbyte/Getty Images (RF)
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Brinkley, Alan.
The unfinished nation: a concise history of the American people / Alan
Brinkley, Columbia University; with contributions from John Giggie, University of Alabama;
Andrew Huebner, University of Alabama. — Eighth edition.
pages cm
ISBN 978-0-07-351333-1 (alkaline paper) — ISBN 0-07-351333-4
(alkaline paper)
1. United States—History. I. Giggie, John Michael, 1965- II. Huebner,
Andrew. III. Title.
E178.1.B827 2016
973—dc23
2015025264
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website
does not indicate an endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education
does not guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
John Giggie is associate professor of history and African American studies at the
University of Alabama. He is the author of After Redemption: Jim Crow and the
Transformation of African American Religion in the Delta, 1875–1917, editor of America
Firsthand, and editor of Faith in the Market: Religion and the Rise of Commercial Culture.
He is currently preparing a book on African American religion during the Civil War. He has
been honored for his teaching, most recently with a Distinguished Fellow in Teaching award
from the University of Alabama. He received his PhD from Princeton University.
• ix
BRIEF CONTENTS
PREFACE XXIII
APPENDIX 823
GLOSSARY 851
INDEX 855
x•
CONTENTS
PREFACE XXIII
20 THE PROGRESSIVES
THE PROGRESSIVE IMPULSE 488
487
APPENDIX 823
GLOSSARY 851
INDEX 855
PREFACE
THE title The Unfinished Nation is meant to suggest several things. It is a reminder of America’s
exceptional diversity—of the degree to which, despite all the many efforts to build a
single, uniform definition of the meaning of American nationhood, that meaning remains contested.
It is a reference to the centrality of change in American history—to the ways in which the nation
has continually transformed itself and continues to do so in our own time. And it is also a descrip-
tion of the writing of American history itself—of the ways in which historians are engaged in a
continuing, ever unfinished, process of asking new questions.
Like any history, The Unfinished Nation is a product of its time and reflects the views of the
past that historians of recent generations have developed. The writing of our nation’s history—like
our nation itself—changes constantly. It is not, of course, the past that changes. Rather, historians
adjust their perspectives and priorities, ask different kinds of questions, and uncover and incorporate
new historical evidence. There are now, as there have always been, critics of changes in historical
understanding who argue that history is a collection of facts and should not be subject to “interpre-
tation” or “revision.” But historians insist that history is not simply a collection of facts. Names and
dates and a record of events are only the beginning of historical understanding. Writers and readers
of history interpret the evidence before them, and inevitably bring to the task their own questions,
concerns, and experiences.
Our history requires us to examine the many different peoples and ideas that have shaped
American society. But it also requires us to understand that the United States is a nation whose
people share many things: a common political system, a connection to an integrated national (and
now international) economy, and a familiarity with a powerful mass culture. To understand the
American past, it is necessary to understand both the forces that divide Americans and the forces
that draw them together.
It is a daunting task to attempt to convey the history of the United States in a single book, and
the eighth edition of The Unfinished Nation has, as have all previous editions, been carefully writ-
ten and edited to keep the book as concise and readable as possible.
In addition to the content and scholarship updates that are detailed on pages xxix–xxx, we
have strengthened the pedagogical features with an eye to the details. We added a glossary of
historical terms and bolded those terms within the text where significantly discussed. These terms,
along with key names, places, and events, are listed at the end of chapters to help students review.
All of the Consider the Source features now include concise introductions that provide context for
the documents. Every Consider the Source, Debating the Past, Patterns of Popular Culture, and
America in the World feature is referenced within the narrative, for a clearer indication of how the
different lines of inquiry work together to create a vivid and nuanced portrait of each period. Margin
notes have been reinstated as well, at the request of reviewers who missed this feature from earlier
editions.
It is not only the writing of history that changes with time—the tools and technologies through
which information is delivered change as well. New learning resources include:
∙ McGraw-Hill Connect®—an integrated educational platform that seamlessly joins superior
content with enhanced digital tools (including SmartBook®) to deliver a personalized learning
experience that provides precisely what students need—when and how they need it. New visual
analytics, coupled with powerful reporting, provide immediate performance perspectives.
Connect makes it easy to keep students on track.
• xxiii
xxiv • PREFACE
∙ SmartBook®—an adaptive eBook that makes study time as productive and efficient as pos-
sible. It identifies and closes knowledge gaps through a continually adapting reading expe-
rience that provides personalized learning resources such as narrated map videos; key point
summaries; time lines; and labeling activities at the precise moment of need. This ensures
that every minute spent with SmartBook is returned to the student as the most value-added
minute possible.
∙ Critical Missions—an activity within Connect History that immerses students in pivotal
moments in history. As students study primary sources and maps, they advise a key historical
figure on an issue of vital importance—for example, should President Truman drop the atomic
bomb on Japan?
∙ Primary Source Primer—a video exercise in Connect History with multiple-choice questions.
The primer teaches students the importance of primary sources and how to analyze them. This
online “Introduction to Primary Sources” is designed for use at the beginning of the course, to
save valuable class time.
∙ Create™—a service that allows professors to create a customized version of The Unfinished
Nation by selecting the chapters and additional primary source documents that best fit their
course, while adding their own materials if desired. Register at www.mcgrawhillcreate.com to
build a complimentary review copy.
∙ McGraw-Hill Campus—a first-of-its-kind institutional service that provides faculty with true,
single sign-on access to all of McGraw-Hill’s course content, digital tools, and other high-quality
learning resources from any learning management system (LMS). This innovative offering allows
secure, deep integration and seamless access to any of our course solutions, including McGraw-Hill
Connect, McGraw-Hill LearnSmart, McGraw-Hill Create, and Tegrity. McGraw-Hill Campus
covers our entire content library, including eBooks, assessment tools, presentation slides, and
multimedia content, among other resources. This open and unlimited service allows faculty to
quickly prepare for class, create tests or quizzes, develop lecture material, integrate interactive
content, and much more.
Alan Brinkley
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
carrying her that respect and reverence, as if she had been his
mother. And she again in her discretion, advised him in some things
that concerned himself, and in other things that touched herself; in
all shewing great affection and sisterly care of him. The young king
would burst forth in tears, grieving matters could not be according
to her will and desire. And when the duke his uncle did use her
with straitness and want of liberty, he besought her to have
patience until he had more years, and then he would remedy all.
When she was to take leave, he seemed to part from her with
sorrow; he kissed her, he called for some jewel to present her, he
complained that they gave him no better to give her. Which noted
by his tutors, order was taken that these visits should be very rare,
alleging that they made the king sad and melancholy; and
consulted to have afflicted her officer and servants; for that
contrary to the then made law, she had public Mass in her chapel, if
they could draw any consent from the king. But he, upon no
reasons, would ever give way to it, and commanded strictly that
she might have full liberty of what she would. He sent to her,
inquiring if they gave her any trouble or molestation, for if they did,
it was against his will, and he would see her contented. But it was
not safe, nor did it stand with prudence, as the times went, for the
Lady Mary to complain” (The Life of Jane Dormer, Duchess of Feria,
pp. 61-62).
[255] Gregorio Leti in his Historia di Elisabetta publishes a letter
written by Elizabeth to the Admiral (vol. i., p. 171) in which she
declined the offer of his hand. There is no possibility of verifying
the fact, as the original letter to which Leti had access has since
disappeared; but as he has proved himself careful in instances
which have been verified, there is no reason to doubt his accuracy
in those which cannot be submitted to a like scrutiny.
[256] Ellis’s Letters, vol. ii., p. 151, 1st series.
[257] Lansdowne MS. 1236, f. 26. Printed in Ellis’s Letters, vol. ii.,
p. 149, 1st series (a facsimile of this letter in Mary’s own hand is on
the next page).
[258] Leti, Historia di Elisabetta, vol. i., p. 180. Printed in Letters
of Royal and Illustrious Ladies, vol. iii., p. 193.
[259] Record Office, State Papers, vol. vi., 19, 20, 21, 22 Feb.
1549.
[260] Journal of King Edward’s Reign, written in the King’s own
hand.
[261] Burnet, History of the Reformation, vol. ii., p. 187.
[262] Latimer’s Sermons, 1st edition, 4th sermon. The passage
was expunged in the later editions.
[263] Add. MS. 5151, f. 308, Brit. Mus.
[264] Statutes of the Realm, iv., 110.
[265] Ridley ordered the altars in his diocese to be taken down, as
occasions of great superstition and error; and tables to be set in
their room, in some convenient place in the chancel or choir. The
Catholics ridiculed the tables as “oyster-boards” (Strype, Annals of
the Reformation, p. 355).
[266] Acts of the Privy Council, new series, vol. ii., p. 312, edited
by John Roche Dasent.
[267] Lansdowne MS. 1236, f. 28, Brit. Mus.
[268] Lemon, Dom., Edward VI., vol. i., p. 22, art. 51.
[269] Acts of the Privy Council, vol. ii., p. 291, new series.
[270] Foxe, vol. vi., p. 12.
[271] Journal of King Edward’s Reign, 21.
[272] Turnbull, Cal. State Papers, Edward VI., Foreign, 1547-53, p.
75.
[273] Turnbull, Cal. State Papers, Edward VI., Foreign, 1547-53, p.
137.
[274] Turnbull, Cal. State Papers, Edward VI., Foreign, 1547-53, p.
137.
[275] Acts of the Privy Council, vol. iii., p. 239, new series.
[276] Ibid.
[277] Ibid., p. 240.
[278] Ibid., p. 329.
[279] Harl. MS. 352, f. 186. Ellis’s Letters, vol. ii., p. 176, 1st
series.
[280] Acts of the Privy Council, vol. iii., p. 336 et seq., new series.
[281] Acts of the Privy Council, vol. iii., p. 348 et seq.
[282] Turnbull, Cal. State Papers, Foreign, p. 53. Strype,
Ecclesiastical Memorials, vol. ii., pt. i., p. 457.
[283] Lansdowne MS. 2, f. 141.
[284] Foxe, Acts and Monuments, vol vi., p. 354, Cattley’s ed.
[285] Ecclesiastical Memorials, vol. ii., pt. i., p. 444.
[286] Sharon Turner, History of England, vol. xi., p. 325 note.
CHAPTER IX.
THE COMING OF THE QUEEN.
1553.
The hereditary enmity between Charles V. and the King of France,
which in its earliest stages had deluged Europe with blood, and had
made of the city of Rome a shambles, was in its later developments
the cause of most of the troubles of Mary’s reign. Scarcely was it
whispered that Edward lay dying, when England became at once the
political battlefield of their conflicting interests.
Charles opened the campaign by sending over from Brussels three
envoys extraordinary, ostensibly to visit the King, but really to watch
Mary’s case in the interest of the empire. These envoys were Jean
de Montmorency Sieur de Corrières, Jacques de Mornix Sieur de
Toulouse, and last, though by no means the least, Simon Renard,
who was destined to play an important part in Mary’s future. France
too was immediately in the field, and Henry II. despatched two
envoys to the coast, with instructions to remain at Boulogne till
further orders, while de Noailles, his ambassador in England, made
overtures to Northumberland of French aid in the event of foreigners
attempting to disturb the tranquillity of the realm.
Charles’s aim was to bring about a marriage between his son and
his cousin, as soon as Mary might be sure of reigning, in the hope
that their issue would exclude the next legitimate heir to the throne
of England, the young Scottish Queen already betrothed to the
Dauphin. On the other hand, Henry’s object was of course to defeat
this project, to prevent Mary Tudor if possible from succeeding to
her inheritance, to place obstacles in the way of any marriage that
might be proposed, and above all to hinder by every means in his
power, her union with the Prince of Spain.
Mary was no politician. The diplomacy under which she had
suffered had not taught her to meet treachery with dissimulation
and fraud with cunning. She could arm herself at all points for
defence, but she was not a good dissembler. “To be plain with you,”
was an expression natural to her, and all her words and actions were
plain, clean-cut and unmistakable. Her letters are a distinct contrast
to Elizabeth’s monuments of mystification, framed to confuse, if not
altogether to mislead. Perhaps Mary’s greatest misfortune was that
she was born fifty years too late. Her virtues and her faults were
those of a past, or rapidly passing, age. She belonged by every fibre
of her nature to the old order, while the world about her was holding
out eager arms to the Renaissance, to the new life that was so well
worth living, the new learning that added a fresh impetus to
intellectual pursuits, to the new religion that was to lead men away
from the purgative into the illuminative way, abolishing good works
as snares of the Evil One. The world was advancing; Mary with a few
kindred spirits was reactionary, and if for a while, her popularity was
as great, the nation’s love for her as enthusiastic as ever, it was
because people were still more than half unconscious of the new
forces at work among them. England was not yet Protestantised.
The legislation of five or six years had not overcome the habits of
thought formed by nine centuries, and although a new generation
had sprung up since the rupture with Rome, believing that Pope
spelt arch-enemy, the greater number of Englishmen were in all
other respects Catholics by choice. But as strong as their particular
fear of Rome was their general distrust of all foreigners, and
especially of Spaniards; and the French ambassador took care to
keep that distrust alive, and to increase it by every means in his
power.
Edward lay dying, but no sign was allowed to transpire of the
revolution that was intended. The Council Registers are a blank, save
for significant entries concerning the removal of artillery from the
ships and forts to the Tower. But these ominous if silent preparations
did not escape the notice of the imperial envoys, who kept close
watch, to prevent a surprise.
The young King breathed his last on the evening of the 6th July,
but it had been arranged that the event should be kept secret, till all
was in readiness for the great stroke. The guards were doubled in
the palace, and every care was taken that the outer world should
still ask anxiously for news from the sick chamber. Nevertheless, that
same night, Mary was informed of her brother’s death. She had
ridden from Hunsdon, where she was then residing, towards
London, and was expected by the conspirators at court, whence she
would have been at once transferred in safe custody to the Tower.
At Hoddesden, however, she was met by a secret messenger,
bringing the fateful news. Putting spurs to her horse, she rode into
the eastern counties, with the intention of gaining Kenninghall, a
house in Norfolk left to her by Henry VIII., the gift being confirmed
by a grant of the second year of Edward VI. On the way, she
stopped to rest at the house of Mr. Huddleston of Sawston, and in
consequence of her prompt action, while she was under this
hospitable roof, the bubble blown by Northumberland burst sooner
than had been intended. On leaving Sawston, Mary looked back
from the summit of a neighbouring hill, and saw smoke rising from
the house that had sheltered her. The rebels had set fire to it,
thinking that she was still there. It was burned to the ground, but
after the rebellion, the Queen granted to Mr. Huddleston the
materials from the ruins of Cambridge Castle, with which to rebuild
his home.[287] Hengrave Hall was the next halting-place, whence
John Bourchier, Earl of Bath, accompanied her with a considerable
force to Kenninghall. [288] From thence, she sent proclamations into
all parts of the country, announcing her accession, and calling her
loyal subjects to her aid. Among the muniments of Condover Hall,
Shropshire, is a letter from Mary dated six days after Edward’s
death, and addressed to the Mayor of Chester, summoning the
inhabitants of that part of the county to raise as great a force as
possible, and repair to her at Kenninghall, or elsewhere in Norfolk,
“wherefore right trusty and well-beloved, as ye be true Englishmen,
fail ye not”.
With her were the Earl of Sussex, the Lord Mordaunt, Sir William
Drury, Sir John Shelton, Sir Henry Bedingfeld, Sir Henry Jerningham,
besides the Earl of Bath and his contingent. As her whereabouts
became known, numbers flocked to her standard. In two days, she
found herself at the head of 30,000 men, and while the conspirators
were taking possession of the Tower, of the Crown, of the Crown
jewels and the revenues, Mary without a single accessory of royalty,
without arms or money, was gathering round her the flower of the
nobility, and was issuing manifestoes to the whole kingdom, as
calmly as if she were already undisputed mistress of the realm.
When it became known that the Duke of Northumberland was
advancing with an army, she removed her quarters to Framlingham,
a strongly fortified house belonging to the Duke of Norfolk, who had
been a prisoner in the Tower ever since 1546.[289] A report was
circulated that the Council was about to execute him, together with
the rest of the State prisoners, Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester,
deprived for religion, and Edward Courtenay, son of the Marquis of
Exeter who was beheaded in the same cause in 1538.[290] On the
10th July, Jane was proclaimed Queen.
“Item the x. day of the same month, after vii. o’clock at night was
made a proclamation at the Cross in Cheap by three herolds and one
trumpet, with the King’s Sheriff of London, Master Garrard, with
divers of the guards, for Jane, the Duke of Suffolk’s daughter to be
Queen of England (but few or none said ‘God save her’) the which
was brought the same afternoon from Richmond unto Westminster,
and so unto the Tower of London by water.”[291] At the same time,
the Lady Mary and the Lady Elizabeth were declared illegitimate, and
all estates and degrees were called upon to be obedient to their
lawful sovereign, Queen Jane. A vintner’s boy in the crowd ventured
to protest against the usurpation, and for his temerity was nailed to
the pillory by the ears, both of which were amputated before he
could be set free.[292]
Earlier in the day, the demise of the Crown had been announced
in London, and when the Lady Jane arrived at the Tower, she was
surrounded with as much state as was possible. The Lord Treasurer
presented her ceremoniously with the Crown; all knelt as she passed
by; her train was carried by her mother, the Duchess of Suffolk. But
the space at the disposal of the new court was extremely limited,
the Tower being crowded with prisoners, as well as with the
members of the new government, who were all lodged there for
safety.
In spite of the lack of enthusiasm, and the silence with which Jane
was received, even in Protestant London, the imperial ambassadors
thought Mary’s determined attitude “strange, difficult and
dangerous,” fearing that in four days she would be in the hands of
the Council. Though the people hated Northumberland for his
ambition, and dreaded him for his tyranny, and though they gave
credit to the rumours that Edward had been poisoned,[293] even
Mary’s friends were of the opinion that it would be necessary to
appeal to the Emperor to place her on the throne. This, the
ambassadors thought, would in no wise diminish the affection of the
country for her, so entirely was she beloved by the people. [294]
Their view of the desperate character of her resistance was
strengthened by the information that Northumberland had sent his
son Lord Henry Dudley into France, to solicit troops, and that 6000
French soldiers were expected shortly to embark at Dieppe and
Boulogne.
On the 11th, a letter from Mary, addressed to the Lords of the
Council was brought to the Tower. It ran as follows:—
“My Lords,
“We greet you well, and have received sure advertisement that our
dearest brother the King, our late sovereign lord, is departed to God’s
mercy; which news, how woeful they be unto our heart, he only knoweth,
to whose will and pleasure, we must and do, humbly submit us and our
wills. But in this so lamentable a case, that is to wit, now after his
Majesty’s departure and death, concerning the crown and governance of
this realm of England, with the title of France, and all things thereto
belonging, what hath been provided by act of Parliament, and the
testament and last will of our dearest father, beside other circumstances
advancing our right, you know, the realm and the whole world knoweth;
the rolls and records appear by the authority of the King our said father,
and the King our said brother, and the subjects of this realm; so that we
verily trust that there is no true good subject that is, can or would pretend
to be, ignorant thereof. And of our part we have of ourselves caused, and
as God shall aid and strengthen us, shall cause, our right and title in this
behalf to be published and proclaimed accordingly. And albeit this so
weighty a matter seemeth strange, that our said brother, dying upon
Thursday at night last past, we hitherto had no knowledge from you
thereof, yet we consider your wisdom and prudence to be such, that
having eftsoons amongst you debated, pondered, and well weighed this
present case with our estate, with your own estate, the commonwealth
and all our honours, we shall and may conceive great hope and trust, with
much assurance in your loyalty and service; and therefore for the time,
interpret and take things not to the worst; and that ye will like noblemen
work the best. Nevertheless, we are not ignorant of your consultations to
undo the provisions made for our preferment, nor of the great bands and
provisions forcible, wherewith ye be assembled and prepared, by whom,
and to what end, God and you know, and nature can but fear some evil.
But be it that some consideration politic, or whatsoever thing else hath
moved you thereto; yet doubt you not my lords, but we can take all these
your doings in gracious part, being also right ready to remit and fully
pardon the same, and that freely, to eschew bloodshed and vengeance
against all those that can or will intend the same; trusting also assuredly,
you will take and accept this grace and virtue in good part, as
appertaineth, and that we shall not be enforced to use the service of
other our true subjects and friends, which in this our just and right cause,
God, in whom our whole affiance is, shall send us. Wherefore my lords,
we require you and charge you, and every of you, that of your allegiance,
which you owe to God and us, and to none other, for our honour, and the
surety of our person, only employ yourselves, and forthwith, upon receipt
hereof, cause our right and title to the crown and governance of this
realm to be proclaimed in our city of London, and other places, as to your
wisdom shall seem good, and as to this case appertaineth; not failing
hereof, as our very trust is in you. And this our letter signed with our
hand, shall be your sufficient warrant in this behalf.
“Given under our signet at our manor of Kenninghall, the 9th of July
1553.”
This display of courage made no impression on the conspirators,
and they made answer:—
“Madam,
“We have received your letters the 9th of this instant, declaring your
supposed title, which you judge yourself to have, to the imperial crown of
this realm, and all the dominions thereunto belonging. For answer
whereof, this is to advertise you, that for as much as our sovereign lady
queen Jane is after the death of our sovereign lord Edward the 6th, a
prince of most noble memory, invested and possessed with the just and
right title in the imperial crown of this realm, not only by good order of old
ancient laws of this realm, but also by our late sovereign lord’s letters
patent, signed with his own hand, and sealed with the great Seal of
England, in presence of the most part of the nobles, councillors, judges,
with divers other grave and sage personages, assenting and subscribing
to the same. We must therefore of most bound duty and allegiance assent
unto her said grace, and to none other, except we should, which faithful
subjects cannot, fall into grievous and unspeakable enormities. Wherefore
we can no less do, but for the quiet both of the realm and you also, to
advertise you, that forasmuch as the divorce made between the King of
famous memory Henry 8th and the lady Katherine, your mother, was
necessary to be had, both by the everlasting laws of God, and also by the
ecclesiastical laws, and by the most part of the noble and learned
universities of Christendom, and confirmed also by the sundry acts of
Parliament, remaining yet in their force, and thereby you justly made
illegitimate and unheritable to the crown imperial of this realm, and the
rules and dominions, and possessions of the same, you will, upon just
consideration hereof, and of divers other causes lawful to be alleged for
the same, and for the just inheritance of the right line and godly order,
taken by the late King our sovereign lord King Edward the 6th, and agreed
upon by the nobles and great personages aforesaid, surcease by any
pretence, to vex and molest any of our sovereign lady Queen Jane her
subjects, from their true faith and allegiance unto her grace: assuring you,
that if you will for respect, show yourself quiet and obedient, as you
ought, you shall find us all and several ready to do you any service that
we with duty may, and be glad with your quietness, to preserve the
common state of this realm: wherein you may be otherwise grievous unto
us, to yourself and to them. And thus we bid you most heartily well to
fare.
“From the Tower of London, in this 9th July 1553.
“Your ladyship’s friends, showing yourself an obedient subject.”
Then follow the signatures of all the members of the Council,
thus:—
“Thomas Canterbury, the Marquis of Winchester, John Bedford,
Will. Northampton, Thomas Ely, chancellor; Northumberland, Henry
Suffolk, Henry Arundel, Shrewsbury, Pembroke, Cobham, R. Rich,
Huntingdon, Darcy, Cheney, R. Cotton, John Gates, W. Peter, W.
Cecill, John Cheeke, John Mason, Edward North, R. Bowes”.[295]
The confident tone of the above letter concealed the real
sentiments of the conspirators. The Duke of Suffolk had been
commissioned by Northumberland to march into Norfolk, seize
Mary’s person, and bring her a prisoner to London. But Jane
besought her father with tears not to leave her, and Northumberland
reluctantly took the command of the rebel troops himself. As they
marched through Shoreditch, he observed to Sir John Gates, “The
people crowd to look upon us, but not one exclaims God speed
ye!”[296]
He had no illusions about the attitude of the citizens, and trusted
more to an eloquent and fiery appeal to their Protestantism, than to
the hope of overawing them with the shadow of a sovereignty, for
which they evinced undisguised contempt. Before leaving London,
therefore, he charged the ministers of religion to expatiate in their
sermons on the benefits to be derived from the reign of a Protestant
queen, and thus work on their religious feelings. Ridley, Bishop of
London, was the preacher at Paul’s Cross on the 16th July. He
declaimed violently against Mary, and sought to persuade his hearers
that she would bring in foreign power, and subvert all Christian
religion already established. He stigmatised her religion as a “popish
creed,” and herself as “the idolatrous rival” of Queen Jane. He
related the story of his visit to her at Hunsdon, and remarked on the
significance of her refusal to listen to his preaching, adding that
“notwithstanding in all other points of civility, she showed herself
gentle and tractable, yet in matters that concerned truth, faith and
doctrine—so stiff and obstinate that there was no other hope of her
to be conceived, but to disturb and overturn all that which with so
great labours had been confirmed and planted by her brother afore”.
[297]
Sir William Petre had also tried to make compromises with the
Duke, but had succumbed, on being told that unless he agreed to
the whole plan he could no longer retain his office of Secretary of
State. Each day brought Mary fresh conquests. After a nine days’
rebellion, without a single blow having been struck in her defence,
she was proclaimed Queen in every town in England. Her journey to
London was a triumphal progress. Antoine de Noailles, the French
ambassador, who had so lately conspired with Edward’s Council, and
who was to be the evil genius of the new reign, rode twenty-five
miles into the country to meet and congratulate the Queen in his
master’s name, offering her the whole of the French forces, in
support of her right. At Wanstead, she was joined by the Lady
Elizabeth, who had prudently abstained from taking sides, till it
should be clear where success lay. She had declined
Northumberland’s overtures, and offers of large sums of money, but
had equally avoided moving a finger in Mary’s cause, pleading an
illness, which however allowed her to recover opportunely, when the
Queen was about to take possession of her capital. Mary greeted her
affectionately, embraced all her ladies, and assigned her the next
place in the royal cortège after herself.[309] Together they entered
the City of London at Aldgate, on the 3rd August, and rode through
the densely crowded streets, the multitude rending the air with
shouts of joy. Elizabeth was too clever not to estimate at its real
value the contrast presented by the two sisters on this striking
occasion. In spite of their loyalty and enthusiasm in realising the
reward of their long devotion, the people could not fail to observe,
that the Queen at thirty-seven, worn with trouble and sickness, was
eclipsed by Elizabeth’s twenty years.
Elizabeth was tall and majestic, more gracious than beautiful, pale
of complexion, with fine eyes, and hands that were admired for their
whiteness and elegance. It was noticed that she knew how to use
them effectively.[310]
At the Tower, where according to custom, the Queen was to reside
pending her brother’s obsequies, the State prisoners of the two
preceding reigns were kneeling on the Green, in front of the
scaffold. These were the Duchess of Somerset, who had been in
captivity since the execution of her husband; the aged Duke of
Norfolk; Edward Courtenay, son of the Marquis of Exeter, beheaded
in 1538; Tunstal and Gardiner, the deprived Bishops of Durham and
Winchester. Gardiner, in the name of them all, congratulated Mary on
her accession, and without complaining of the injustice of their
detention expressed their joy at seeing her victorious over her
enemies.[311]
“Ye are my prisoners!” exclaimed the Queen, bursting into tears.
Embracing them all, she ordered them to be released at once, and
took them with her to the royal apartments. Their goods, their rank,
their sees were restored. The next day, Gardiner was sworn a
member of the Privy Council, and three weeks later, was made Lord
Chancellor of England.
The names of twenty-seven persons concerned in the rebellion
were handed to the Queen. Of these she struck out sixteen, leaving
eleven to be tried. These were again reduced to seven—the Duke of
Northumberland, his son the Earl of Warwick, the Marquis of
Northampton, Sir John Gates, Sir Henry Gates, Sir Andrew Dudley
and Sir Thomas Palmer. The law then took its course, and they were
condemned to death. But Mary again intervened; four were
reprieved, and three only of the ringleaders, the Duke of
Northumberland, Sir John Gates and Sir Thomas Palmer, his chief
advisers, were executed. The Emperor urged her in vain to include
the Lady Jane in the number of those to be tried for high treason.
The Queen spoke warmly in her defence, and declared that she was
less guilty than he believed her to be. Usurper though she had been,
she was but a tool, and Mary would not have her punished for
another’s crime. She had returned to the Tower as a prisoner, along
with her husband, but was allowed great freedom within its
precincts. The danger of her pretensions was, Mary declared,
imaginary, but every precaution should be taken before she was
restored to liberty.[312] With unprecedented mildness, the Queen
had been inclined to pardon even Northumberland, but Charles put
pressure on her to sign his death-warrant. The Duke made no
defence at his trial, and on the scaffold admitted his crime,
expressed penitence, and declared that he died a member of the
Catholic and Roman Church.[313]
Whether Mary was persuaded of Jane’s innocence on the ground
that the girl was scarcely a free agent, or whether the letter which
Jane wrote to her as a prisoner,[314] turned the balance in her
favour, is not clear, but it is certain that the Queen’s treatment of her
rival at this time was magnanimous to imprudence, as the sequel
showed. As for the other delinquents, no rebellion had ever been
quenched with so little effusion of blood. Far otherwise had been
Henry’s reprisals after the northern rising, far other the crushing of
the insurgents in Edward’s reign. Had the punishment of the rebels
rested entirely with Mary, she would have signalised her advent with
a full and general amnesty. The Duchess of Suffolk had thrown
herself at the Queen’s feet, imploring the pardon and release of her
husband, both of which she obtained immediately; but strange as it
appears, it is not on record that she even attempted to plead for her
daughter.[315]
More stringent measures at the outset would no doubt have
averted the serious disturbances of the following year, and
afterwards; and the opinion of Charles V., that to punish the authors
of sedition was to nip the revolution in the bud, was justified in the
event. He had insisted on the execution of Northumberland and his
lieutenants, but more than this he had not obtained. The people had
little respect or gratitude for a clemency which they did not
understand.
FOOTNOTES:
[287] “He (Mr. Huddleston) was highly honoured afterwards by
Queen Mary, and deservedly. Such the trust she reposed in him that
(when Jane Grey was proclaimed Queen) she came privately to him
to Salston, and rid thence behind his servant (the better to disguise
herself from discovery) to Framlingham castle. She afterwards
made him (as I have heard) her privy councillor and (besides other
great boons) bestowed the bigger part of Cambridge Castle (then
much ruined) upon him, with the stones whereof he built his fair
house in this county” (Fuller, Worthies, i., p. 168).
[288] “A sketch of Hengrave Hall, Suffolk,” by Sir Henry Rookwood
Gage.
[289] Henry had confiscated the place on the attainder of the
Duke of Norfolk. The Duke requested pathetically that he would be
pleased to bestow it on the royal children as it was “stately gear”.
Mary restored it to its rightful owner.
[290] Papiers d’Etat du Cardinal de Granvelle, d’après les
manuscrits de la Bibliothèque de Besançon, publiés sous la
direction de M. Ch. Weiss, tom. iv., p. 31.
[291] Cotton MS. Vit. F. xii., Brit. Mus. Printed in the Chronicle of
Queen Jane and Two Years of Queen Mary, p. 110, appendix.
[292] Holinshed, 1084.
[293] This was so generally believed, that the Emperor told Mary
that she ought to put to death all the conspirators who had any
hand in the late King’s death (Renard apud Griffet, p. 11).
[294] Papiers d’Etat du Cardinal de Granvelle, p. 39.
[295] Foxe, vol. vi., p. 385.
[296] Stow, 610, 611.
[297] Foxe, Acts and Monuments, vol. vi., p. 389. Burnet, vol. ii.,
p. 384. Holinshed, 1087. Bishop Godwin says that “he was scarce
heard out with patience” (Life of Ridley by the Rev. Gloucester
Ridley, LL.B., p. 415).
[298] According to Foxe he “had such cold welcome” at
Framlingham, “that being despoiled of all his dignities, he was sent
back on a lame, halting horse to the Tower” (vol. vi., p. 390).
[299] Chronicle of Queen Jane, etc., p. 8.
[300] De Noailles, Ambassades, i., p. 222.
[301] Acts of the Privy Council, vol. iv., p. 297.
[302] Harl. MS. 353, f. 139 et seq., Brit. Mus.
[303] The Chronicle of Queen Jane, etc., p. 11.
[304] Acts and Monuments, vol. vi., p. 388.
[305] “Dissi loro che se la corona s’ appetava a me, io sarei
contenta di fare il mio marito Duca ma non consentirei di farlo Rè”
(Pollini, Istoria ecclesiastica della rivoluzione d’Inghilterra, p. 357).
[306] The draft is the Lansdowne MS. 3, f. 24, the copy with
Jane’s signature No. 1236 in the same collection.
[307] De Noailles, Ambassades, vol. i., p. 225.
[308] “A Brief Note of my submission and of my doings,”
Lansdowne MS. 102, f. 2, Brit. Mus.; printed by Tytler, England
under the Reigns of Edward VI. and Mary, vol. ii., p. 192.
[309] The Ambassadors of Charles V. to their Master, 6th August
1553, Record Office.
[310] Armand Baschet, La Diplomatie Vénitienne au Seizième
Siècle, p. 128. The Venetian ambassador Sorranzo describes Mary
about this time as “d’une taille plutôt petite que grande, d’une
carnation blanche, mêlée de rouge, et très-maigre; elle a les yeux
gros et gris, les cheveux roux et la figure ronde, avec le nez peut-
être un peu bas et large: en somme, si par suite de son âge elle ne
commençait un peu à marcher vers son déclin, on pourrait plutôt la
dire belle que laide” (ibid., p. 121).
[311] De Noailles, Ambassades, vol. i., p. 228.
[312] Harl. MS. 284, f. 127, Brit. Mus.
[313] Foxe says that he was induced to make this profession by a
promise of pardon; but this assumption appears to be purely
gratuitous.
[314] Pollini, p. 355. For the text of this letter see Appendix C to
this volume.
[315] It is remarkable that active as the Duchess of Suffolk had
been in the usurpation, she was always treated by Mary with
consideration and even confidence.
CHAPTER X.
AGAINST THE TIDE.
July-December 1553.
Mary’s opportunity was in many ways a splendid one. From her
earliest youth, the new Queen had been the hope, the admiration,
the delight of the English people, and the poet expressed no mere
conceit in the words:—
Il n’est cœur si triste qui ne rie
En attendant la princesse Marie.
The whole country welcomed her as one man, and it may be truly
said that it was the affection of Englishmen, no less than their loyalty
that had placed her on the throne. Nevertheless, she was beset with
difficulties. The art of reigning as she understood it was part and
parcel of the mediæval system, but it needed a spirit touched with
the inspiration of the new age, to direct the restless activities of a
nation already beginning to be permeated with the Renaissance.
While she looked back to the past, her people had emancipated
themselves from mediæval traditions.
Moulding her conduct on the ideals which she had venerated from
her youth upwards, she regarded the new needs and tendencies
with suspicion and dislike; and thus gradually a breach was formed
between herself and the nation. She had its interests as sincerely at
heart as any English monarch either before or after her, but those
interests, as she understood them, were hopelessly at variance with
the seething crowd of ideas that were transforming the life of the
people.
With intense honesty of purpose, Mary stood at the parting of the
ways, between a mediævalism that seemed good in her eyes, and a
progress that all her experience had taught her to interpret as
revolution. It was partly her inability to distinguish between the two,
to seize the good element in the new modes of thought, that
brought about the catastrophe of her reign, and evolved anarchy out
of aspirations, which ably led and controlled, might have contributed
to the welfare of the realm. If it is unfortunate to be born in advance
of one’s age, it is doubly so to be behind it; but if conscientious
motives and earnest endeavour could have compensated for the
mistake, Mary would have won golden opinions instead of hatred
and abuse. But there were difficulties quite independent of her own
limitations. At the outset, the task of forming a government was a
delicate one. Nearly all the statesmen of the time had been
members of Edward’s Council and had proved themselves traitors.
When she had restored the Duke of Norfolk to the Council Board,
had installed Sir John Gage as Constable of the Tower, had made Sir
Henry Jerningham a member of her Privy Council, Vice-Chancellor
and Captain of the Guard, had knighted her faithful Rochester and
set him over her household, had promoted Waldegrave to the charge
of the Grand Wardrobe, and had made Sir Francis Englefield a Privy
Councillor, the most important of the public offices remained to be
filled by those whom she could neither afford to offend nor to
dispense with, but who had all failed at the critical moment. The Earl
of Arundel became Lord Steward, the Marquis of Winchester
retained his office of High Treasurer, while many others of doubtful
loyalty, including Sir William Petre and Sir John Masone, made her
Privy Council a compact body of potential conspirators. Lord Paget,
the most dangerous of all, became Secretary of State and Privy Seal.
Gardiner, henceforth Lord Chancellor, had once vehemently opposed
the validity of her mother’s marriage, although he had since amply
vindicated his claim to Mary’s regard, and stood highest of all in her
counsels, a sufficient answer to the charge so often made that the
Queen had foredoomed Cranmer, because he had pronounced the
sentence of divorce.
Mary lost no time in acquainting the Emperor and the French King
with her resolve to bring back Catholic worship. Henry congratulated