DLP
DLP
Cenizal-Raymundo, H. (2016). Reading and Writing Skills. Makati City: DIWA Learning
Systems, Inc.
Good morning, class! Please be reminded of G –Give Respect: Listen, speak kindly,
our house rules, could someone please read and value others' opinions.
it?
E –Engage Actively: Participate in
discussions and complete tasks.
Checking of Attendance
Well said. What are the different types of There are mainly three types: claims of
claims? fact, which state something that can be
proven true or false; claims of value,
which express judgments about something
being good or bad; and claims of policy,
which argue for or against a specific
course of action.
Very good. Can someone explain the key What really stuck with me is how claims
ideas that stood out to you or that you really of policy often lead to debates because
understood? they focus on what should be done, which
makes them more persuasive and
challenging to prove.
Topic:
For the First 2 groups: (Students present their arguments)
Learning math is more about practice than
memorization.
Abstraction
Our activity showcased your ability to Textual evidence is information stated in a
evaluate textual evidence What are textual given text that is used to support
evidences? inferences, claims and assertions. It is
considered the basis of argument and
analysis in the composition of a critical
analysis paper.
But why are these important? By applying our critical reading and
thinking skills, we can gather textual
evidences to validate the information that
we gathered.
Thank you for that answer! Textual evidence Explicit textual evidence is information
is stated in two forms: explicit and inferred. that is directly stated in a text. Inferred
How are they different from each other? textual evidence is information that can be
gathered through clues given thought the
text.
Very good! Take note that these work no 1) Read and understand the question
matter what kind of text you are examining or claim.
(fiction or non-fiction). We will learn more 2) Closely read the text to find the
tips later on, but for now, here are some answer.
important general steps as strategies in 3) Note inferences and quotations
locating textual evidences, can someone from the passage that support the
please read it? answer or claim.
4) Analyze the evidence. How does
this textual evidence support a
claim or idea from the passage?
What makes this evidence strong?
Base on our activity earlier, what is assertion An assertion is a statement or claim that
and counter claim? expresses a strong belief or opinion about
a topic. It is typically supported by
evidence and reasoning.
Thank you! The Counterclaim is the These are claims made to rebut a previous
opposition you make about the claim of a claim, alternative views, the other side of
writer. What is counterclaim and why is it the argument. By anticipating
important? counterclaims to your own claims, you
will be prepared for other people’s
criticisms of your own ideas.
The counterclaims in the text are usually a. What are the major points on which you
presented in a straightforward way. After and the author can disagree?
spotting these statements, you, as a reader or
writer, can clearly define your position in a b. What is their strongest argument? What
particular topic. Tiongson gave the following did they say to defend their position?
questions that can help one formulate a
counterclaim. Could you please read it? c. What are the merits of their view?
Learning Assessment
For you Group Enhancement Activity
Group Activity: Evaluating Assertions and
Counterclaims in a Text
Instructions:
1. The class will be divided into six
groups.
2. Each group will analyze and evaluate
the given text by identifying
assertions, counterclaims, and
supporting textual evidence.
3. Answer the guide questions as a
group and be ready to present your
findings.
4. You will be given 15 minutes to
discuss and prepare your answers.
Guide Questions:
1. Identify the assertions and
counterclaims presented in the text.
2. What textual evidence is used to
support each assertion and
counterclaim?
3. Are the assertions and counterclaims
well-supported by evidence? Why or
why not?
4. How does the presence of
counterclaims affect the strength of
the arguments?
5. Based on your evaluation, how would
you determine if an argument is
credible and reliable?
Rubric for Evaluating Group Activity: Textual Evidence, Assertions, and Counterclaims
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory Needs Score
(3) Improvement
(2)
Identification Clearly Identifies most Identifies Fails to identify
of Assertions identifies all assertions and some key assertions
and assertions and counterclaims assertions and and
Counterclaims counterclaims with minimal counterclaims counterclaims
in the text with errors. but with or makes
full accuracy. several errors. significant
errors.
Use of Textual Provides strong Provides Provides Provides little
Evidence and relevant sufficient limited or or no evidence
textual evidence, but somewhat to support
evidence to some may be weak evidence claims or
support weak or with little evidence is
assertions and slightly relevance to irrelevant.
counterclaims. irrelevant. claims.
Critical Analyzes Analyzes Offers basic Lacks analysis
Evaluation of evidence in- evidence analysis but or provides
Evidence depth, clearly with a lacks depth in superficial or
explaining how reasonable explaining the unclear
it supports or explanation of evidence's explanations of
weakens the how it supports relevance. evidence.
assertions and the claims.
counterclaims.
Clarity and Presents ideas Presents ideas Presentation is Presentation is
Organization logically and in a mostly somewhat unclear or
coherently, with logical order, unclear or disorganized,
clear transitions though some disorganized, making it hard
between points. parts may lack making it to understand.
clarity. difficult to
follow.
Team All group Most members Some Limited
Collaboration members are are involved members involvement or
and actively with some contribute lack of
Participation involved and contributions more than contribution
contribute from all, others, with a from some
equally to the though few doing group
task. uneven. minimal work. members.
Creativity and The group The group The group The group
Engagement demonstrates demonstrates shows little lacks creativity
creative some creativity, with and does not
thinking and creativity and minimal engage in the
actively engagement in engagement. discussion.
engages in the the discussion.
discussion.
Total Score:
(Out of 25 points)
• 21-25: Excellent
• 16-20: Good
• 11-15: Satisfactory
• 6-10: Needs Improvement