Scribd
Upload
47 views3 pages

ROUSSEAU

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) was a French Enlightenment philosopher known for his work The Social Contract, which discusses freedom, equality, and political authority. He argued that modern civilization corrupts human nature and proposed a social contract where individuals collectively agree to the 'General Will' for the common good. While influential, Rousseau's ideas face criticism for potentially suppressing individual freedom and being overly utopian.

Uploaded by

0azan900
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views3 pages

ROUSSEAU

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) was a French Enlightenment philosopher known for his work The Social Contract, which discusses freedom, equality, and political authority. He argued that modern civilization corrupts human nature and proposed a social contract where individuals collectively agree to the 'General Will' for the common good. While influential, Rousseau's ideas face criticism for potentially suppressing individual freedom and being overly utopian.

Uploaded by

0azan900
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ROUSSEAU (1712-1778)

1. Introduction to Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) was a French philosopher and political thinker of the
Enlightenment era. He is best known for his famous work The Social Contract (1762),
where he presents his ideas about freedom, equality, and political authority. Rousseau’s
philosophy greatly influenced the French Revolution and the development of modern
democratic and republican governments. He is often regarded as a champion of popular
sovereignty and general will.

2. Need for Rousseau’s Theory (Historical Context)

Rousseau wrote during a time of growing inequality, political corruption, and monarchy-
based oppression in 18th-century France. While earlier thinkers like Hobbes and Locke
discussed the role of government, Rousseau went further by questioning whether society
itself corrupts human nature. He believed modern civilization had enslaved people
under unjust governments and property systems, and he sought a political structure
where individuals could remain free and equal.

3. Rousseau’s State of Nature (Key Points)

• ✔ Humans were originally free, peaceful, and happy.


• ✔ In the state of nature, people lived simple lives based on compassion and basic
needs.
• ✔ There was no private property, inequality, or competition.
• The emergence of private property led to greed, jealousy, and social divisions.
• Civilization corrupted human beings and created social inequality.
• People lost their freedom by submitting to unfair political systems.
4. The Social Contract

Rousseau proposed a radical solution to regain freedom and equality — the social
contract:

• People must come together and agree to form a collective body called the
"General Will".
• Everyone gives up individual selfish interests to obey the general will, which
represents the common good.
• True freedom means obeying laws one has helped create.
• Unlike Hobbes’ monarchy or Locke’s limited state, Rousseau supports a direct
democracy.

5. After the Social Contract

Once the social contract is made:

• Society is based on equality, freedom, and collective decision-making.


• All citizens are both rulers and ruled.
• The general will becomes the supreme law — it always aims for the public good.
• If someone disobeys the general will, Rousseau controversially says they can be
“forced to be free,” meaning compelled to act in the interest of all.

6. Criticism of Rousseau’s Theory

• The idea of the "general will" can be misused to suppress individual freedom.
• His theory may lead to majority tyranny — where the majority forces its will on
the minority.
• The phrase “forced to be free” sounds contradictory and authoritarian.
• Critics argue his ideal society is too utopian and difficult to apply in real-world
politics.
• Unlike Locke, Rousseau did not focus much on individual rights or separation
of powers.

You might also like