Neural Computation 2018 Vol 30 Issue 11 - Diplomats Mystery Illness and Pulsed Radio Frequency Microwave Radiation
Neural Computation 2018 Vol 30 Issue 11 - Diplomats Mystery Illness and Pulsed Radio Frequency Microwave Radiation
1 Introduction
the effects seen in the Cuba patients” (Lederman, 2018), to this date, some
media sources continue to reference sonic attacks (Perlez & Myers, 2018).
A different explanation is proposed that, it is suggested, better ac-
commodates the facts, including the “odd, inconsistent array of physical
responses” (Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017) and other “mysteri-
ous” and protean features reported. Reported features are assessed for
compatibility to known effects of radiofrequency/microwave radiation
(RF/MW), particularly pulsed RF/MW. Symptoms and signs are assessed
2 Methods
Weissenstein, Lee et al., 2017; Panetta, 2017), and, particularly during incit-
ing episodes in some, ear pain (Harris, 2018b; Lederman, 2018).
Other symptoms are protean and vary markedly from individual
to individual—“an odd, inconsistent array of physical symptoms”—
Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017). Sleep symptoms (Associated Press,
2017a; Panetta, 2017; Swanson et al., 2018), headaches (Associated Press
in Washington, 2017; Harris, 2018b; Panetta, 2017; Swanson et al., 2018),
cognitive dysfunction (Harris, 2018b; Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee,
3 Results
as inciting episodes Though electromagnetic signals are not themselves sound, RF/MW can lead to perceived noises through the
(Lederman, Weissenstein, & so-called Frey effect (Elder & Chou, 2003) (also called the microwave auditory effect or RF hearing).
Lee, 2017). A 1976 Defense Intelligence Agency report stated, “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be
originating intracranially can be induced by signal modulation at very low average-power densities”
(Adams & Williams, 1976).
A 1988 Air Force Materiel Command report stated, based on knowledge at the time, that “individuals exposed
to pulsed RF/MW radiation have reported hearing a chirping, clicking or buzzing sound emanating from
inside or behind the head. The auditory response has been observed only for pulsed modulated radiation
emitted as a square-wave pulse train. The pulse width and pulse repetition rate are factors that appear to
determine the type of sound perceived. . . . James Lin . . . reports that the sensation of hearing in humans
occurs when the head is irradiated at an average incident power density level of about 0.1 mW/cm2 and a
peak intensity near 300 mW/cm2 . Auditory responses have been observed for a frequency range of
200–3000 MIHz and for pulse widths from 1-100 us” (Bolen, 1988).
The frequency range within which sounds can be heard was broadened by 2003: it was reported that sounds
can be perceived by persons exposed to RF/MW in the 2.4 to 10,000MHz range (Elder & Chou, 2003). It was
noted that the same frequency did not produce the same sound from person to person.
Not all diplomats heard noises Ability to hear RF/MW-induced “sounds” (using the term to refer to the perception, not the stimulus) at all
(Lederman, Weissenstein, & depends on individuals’ high-frequency hearing (Elder & Chou, 2003), as well as on low ambient noise
Lee, 2017). (Elder & Chou, 2003).
2887
Table 1: Continued.
vice had been loosened from around my head” (Conrad & Friedman, 2013). A post regarding a woman who
removed her smart meter after becoming symptomatic repeated several times that the exposure caused her
to hear “grinding” (“Smart meters or no power at all?” 2012), confirming this descriptor as among perceived
RF/MW-hearing induced noises. Among those with ES who communicated with the UCSD ES Survey
group, one stated that in proximity to “electrosmog producing devices, ‘I hear sounds like beehives and
similar [buzzing].’” Another stated, “The hissing in my ears is unbearable sometimes.” One wrote
“annoying noise” was among other symptoms.
Sound doesn’t lessen when RF/MW noises do not lessen with ear occlusion, and may intensify (Frey, 1961). [After] “72 Itron AMI smart
cover ears (Tucker, 2018). meters [were installed] near me in my townhome complex. . . I hear a constant buzzing that is driving me
crazy. It keeps me awake and makes it hard to think. I am not sure if it is an actual sound, or if it is being
generated inside my head, because when I put my fingers in my ears I still hear it. . . . In addition, at about
every 15 or 20 minutes, a more intense whine is added that lasts about 12–15 seconds, that hurts and gives
me a mild headache which stops when the whine stops. . . When I go out into the state and regional parks
around me where there are NO smart meters for miles, I no longer hear the buzzing and my heart doesn’t
race.”
The noises were heard Ability to hear RF/MW-induced sounds at all depends on low ambient noise (Elder & Chou, 2003). Night is
primarily at night generally a time of low ambient noise.
(Lederman, Weissenstein, &
Lee, 2017).
2889
Note: Though “sound” refers to air pressure waves, we will refer to what diplomats “heard” as (perceived) sound.
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Distinctively Auditory symptoms are prominent in reports of diplomats’ experience, including ear pain or pressure (Swanson et al.,
prominent auditory 2018), sometimes within minutes of the perceived attack (Lederman, 2018); tinnitus (Associated Press in Washington,
symptoms 2017; Harris, 2018b; Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017; Lederman, Weissenstein, Lee et al., 2017; Panetta, 2017)
and hearing loss (Associated Press, 2017a, 2017b; Associated Press in Washington, 2017; Lederman, Weissenstein, &
Lee, 2017; Robles & Semple, 2017a; Swanson et al., 2018; Wilkinson, 2017). This, coupled with the strange noises in
diplomats’ reports, likely launched the sonic theory. These idiosyncratic features are key to winnowing potential
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
causes. Symptoms like headache and fatigue arise with many exposures and in many conditions. New onset of
tinnitus and hearing loss is far more distinctive. It is particularly so in the context of the spectrum of other reported
symptoms and effects, and in the context of characteristics of instigating episodes. These distinctive auditory
problems are similarly prominent in people reporting symptoms from RF/MW (Halteman, 2011; Lamech, 2014)
Tinnitus and hearing loss were cited by 80% and 34%, respectively, in the UCSD survey of 202 individuals with current
symptoms from EMR, with pulsed RF/MW causing symptoms in the vast majority (Golomb, 2015a).
“Initial” symptoms were reported to include tinnitus in 50%, ear pain in 30%, and hearing loss in 11%.
Case descriptions shared by affected individuals underscore auditory effects. From the UCSD survey: “I bought a
Kindle W-Fi. I charged it not realizing the default setting was ‘on.’ After 5–10 minutes exposure, I became nauseated,
had a headache, loud tinnitus . . . and was dizzy. I turned the Wi-Fi off and the symptoms completely resolved in
5–10 minutes” (Golomb, 2015a). A description by former educator Brinchman (2011) characterizes her abrupt
development of headaches and hearing loss following introduction of pulsed RF/MW-emitting smart meters to her
(and her neighbors’) homes.
Similarly, physicians and physician groups that assessed patients with health effects from RF/MW and recognized the
connection also highlight effects on hearing. A psychotherapist in Germany with a long-time practice described a
new group of patients with a physiological illness profile encompassing organic brain disease, with constellation of
symptoms compatible with other reports of RF/MW injury. She was the one to discern the tie between patients’
symptoms and their proximity to RF/MW sources (a connection that her patients had often missed obviating nocebo
effects as a source; see Table 4), and to note recovery with removal from those sources (Aschermann, 2009). She
describes “sudden hearing loss” as among the symptoms (in addition to sleep problems described as an “almost
2891
ubiquitous” headache as extremely frequent, also noting, for example, fatigue, cognitive problems, and tinnitus).
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
A group of 114 physicians, referencing their analysis of medical complaints of 356 people in Oberfranken, signed an
open Letter to the Prime Minister of Germany in 2004 (referred to as the Bamberg Appeal), stating, “The pulsed high
frequency electro magnetic fields (from mobile phone base stations, from cable-less DECT telephones, amongst
others), led to a new, previously unknown pattern of illnesses with a characteristic symptom complex”
(Waldman-Selsam, 2004). Prominent and repeated mention is made of hearing loss: “People suffer from one, several
or many of the following symptoms: Sleep disturbances, tiredness, disturbance in concentration, forgetfulness,
problem with finding words, depressive mood, ear noises, sudden loss of hearing, hearing loss, giddiness, nose
bleeds, visual disturbances, frequent infections, sinusitis, joint and limb pains, nerve and soft tissue pains, feeling of
numbness, heart rhythm disturbances, increased blood pressure episodes, hormonal disturbances, night-time
sweats, nausea. . . . It is no way only a subjective sensitivity disturbance. Disturbances of rhythm, hearing problems,
sudden deafness, hearing loss, loss of vision, increased blood pressure, hormonal disturbances, concentration
impairments, and others can be proved using scientific objective measures” (Waldman-Selsam, 2004). Note also the
mention of “ear noises” (the Frey effect).
Some studies that experimentally examine effects of RF/MW on hearing show effects, though not all do (See Table 4 for
discussion of “inconsistent” effects.) A material consideration is that evidence is consistent with a vulnerable
subgroup.
One experimental study in humans found that 60 minutes of close exposure to EMR from a mobile phone “had an
immediate effect on HTL [hearing threshold limits] assessed by pure-tone audiogram and inner ear (assessed by
DPOAE) in young human subjects. It also caused a number of other otologic symptoms” (Alsanosi et al., 2013).
Of note, melatonin, which can be depressed by EMR (see Table 4) and is low in those with EHS (Belpomme et al., 2015),
protects against oxidative radiation injury (see Table 4), including to the inner ear (Karaer et al., 2015).
Pulsed RF/MW (more than continuous) has been shown to increase tympanic temperature, even when, for instance,
colonic temperature is not increased (Frei, Jauchem, & Heinmets, 1988). Since blood flow is critical for cooling and
oxidative stress leads to endothelial dysfunction and may compromise blood flow, affected individuals (see below;
by hypothesis those with greater oxidative stress effects) may experience greater impairment in blood flow—so less
cooling and also impaired delivery (via impaired blood flow) of oxygen, glucose, and other energy substrates as well
as antioxidant defenses. The downstream effects of oxidative stress (e.g., apoptosis, inflammation; see below) and
B. Golomb
impaired cell energy/ mitochondrial dysfunction (cell dysfunction and death) may contribute to auditory pathology.
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
In a study examining the histopathology of cochlear nuclei of rats “exposed continuously for 30 days” to “a GSM-like
2100 MHz EMF” “with a signal level (power) of 5.4 dBm (3.47 mW) to simulate the talk mode on a mobile phone,”
compared to a control group of rats not similarly exposed, “an increase in neuronal degeneration and apoptosis in
the auditory system“ was observed in the RF/MW exposed group (Celiker et al., 2016). “The histopathologic
analysis showed increased degeneration signs in the study group (p = 0.007). In addition, immunohistochemical
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
analysis revealed increased apoptotic index in the study group compared to that in the control group (p = 0.002)”
(Celiker et al., 2016). In another animal study, “a prominent effect of EMS [electromagnetic stimulation] was . . .
severe cochlear damage and permanent sensorimotor hearing loss in experimental animals” (Counter, 1993).
Protean symptoms Beyond the auditory symptoms, the profile of symptoms in diplomats varies from person to person. Different people
report markedly different symptoms (Lederman, Weissenstein, Lee et al., 2017). It was said that “the symptoms and
circumstances reported have varied widely, making some hard to tie conclusively to the attacks” (Lederman, 2017b),
and “The cases vary deeply: different symptoms, different recollections of what happened. That’s what makes the
puzzle so difficult to crack” (Lederman, Weissenstein, Lee et al., 2017). Reported symptoms encompass sleep
problems (Associated Press, 2017a, 2017b; Panetta, 2017), headaches (Associated Press, 2017a; Lederman,
Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017; Panetta, 2017; Robles & Semple, 2017a), cognitive problems (Associated Press, 2017a;
Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017), nausea (Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017), fatigue (Panetta, 2017), and
dizziness (Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017; Robles & Semple, 2017a).
Similar concerns had been raised with RF/MW injury. As Aschermann noted (translated from German), “In the
Deutsche Aerzteblatt [official journal of the German medical association—Bundesaerztekammer] did an article ask the
incredulous question: How could so many different symptoms possibly be attributed to one common underlying
mechanism?” (Aschermann, 2009).
Despite the protean character of symptoms, multiple survey studies verify that a strikingly reproducible suite of
protean symptoms are reported in setting after setting, and in people citing development of symptoms in response to
EMR including RF/MW (see Table 3). The profile of symptoms is strongly similar from study to study, with
sleep/fatigue, headache, and cognitive problems commonly topping the list and auditory and visual symptoms,
dizziness, and nausea figuring in it.
2893
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
A similar primary list (sometimes augmented with a few additional symptoms, often including heart rhythm
problems) is mentioned in other settings. Aschermann’s (2009) analyses of 65 patients cite symptoms of learning
concentration and behavioral problems, headaches, insomnia, exhaustion, tinnitus, hearing loss, dizziness, nerve
and soft tissue pain, “inner agitation,” as well as arrhythmia problems. In the 2004 Bamberg Appeal signed by 114
physicians to the German prime minister, based on analysis of 356 patients: “The pulsed high frequency electro
magnetic fields (from mobile phone base stations, from cable-less DECT telephones, amongst others), led to a new,
previously unknown pattern of illnesses with a characteristic symptom complex. People suffer from one, several or
many of the following symptoms: Sleep disturbances, tiredness, disturbance in concentration, forgetfulness, problem
with finding words, depressive mood, ear noises, sudden loss of hearing, hearing loss, giddiness, nose bleeds, visual
disturbances, frequent infections, sinusitis, joint and limb pains, nerve and soft tissue pains,” also nausea, and
“feeling of numbness, heart rhythm disturbances, increased blood pressure episodes, hormonal disturbances,
night-time sweats. . . . The symptoms occur in temporal and spatial relationship to exposure. It is no way only a
subjective sensitivity disturbance. Disturbances of rhythm, hearing problems, sudden deafness, hearing loss, loss of
vision, increased blood pressure, hormonal disturbances, concentration impairments, and others can be proved
using scientific objective measures” (Waldman-Selsam, 2004).
Among individuals participating in a physiological provocation study examining heart rate variability with RF/MW,
among 25 patients, 40% of whom believed themselves to be moderately or severely electrosensitive, “the most
common symptoms of exposure to electrosmog, as identified by this group of participants, included poor short-term
memory, difficulty concentrating, eye problems, sleep disorder, feeling unwell, headache, dizziness, tinnitus, chronic
fatigue” (Havas et al., 2010).
Of note, the same symptoms also arise in the vulnerable subgroup of persons who develop health problems following
other exposures that share a documented ability to cause mitochondrial impairment and oxidative stress (Chen et al.,
2017; Golomb et al., 2014; Golomb, Koslik et al., 2015; Koslik, Hamilton, & Golomb, 2014; Steele, 2000). However, the
profile, which symptoms dominate, differs from exposure to exposure, based on factors such as what part(s) of the
body the exposure may differentially reach and whether additional mechanisms of injury are involved that
potentiate damage to one domain.
B. Golomb
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Sleep and auditory effects are clearly disproportionately represented, in diplomats and with RF/MW exposure, relative
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
to their prevalence following other exposures that cause oxidative stress. The strong effects on sleep may relate to
depressions in melatonin that can be produced with EMR/ RF/MW (see Table 4). Auditory effects are addressed
above.
A 1990 study commissioned in response to a petition by residents who cited adverse health experiences from a
shortwave radio transmitter in their small town of Schwarzenburg, funded in part by Swiss Telecom, reported that
sleep disruption in association with transmitters related directly to the EMR field strength of the transmitter and
affected 55% of those over age 45 (Altpeter et al., 1995; Lamech, 2014). (There the denominator is not restricted to
those who were symptomatic.)
A 1988 Air Force Materiel Command reports that “pulsed RF/MW radiation was reported to have an analeptic effect in
animals. Experimental results presented by R. D. McAfee in 1971 showed that anesthetized animals could be
awakened by irradiation from a pulsed 10 GHz RF/MW source. . . Experiments conducted on rats showed that these
animals were aroused from states of deep sleep by irradiation” (Bolen, 1988).
The prominence of auditory effects (see above for more on these symptoms) may relate in part to the absence of a skull
structure to protect the inner ear, producing an incident stimulus that is of greater effective intensity.
The coherence of symptoms in response to RF/MW, with findings in Cuba (and China) diplomats, adds further
support to the case for a common cause within each group – and across the two groups.
2895
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Symptoms that are The symptoms reported in media and Swanson et al. (2018) for diplomats, extending to the more specific (e.g.,
(potentially) dizziness/balance, vision and speech problems), are also reported in survey studies of those affected by RF/MW
objectively (see Table 3).
measurable: speech Speech problems, mentioned in diplomats, were also among symptoms elicited and reported in a survey study
(Associated Press, examining effects of RF/MW following “smart meter” introduction in Australia (Lamech, 2014). Reported cases
2017a; Associated illustrate speech problems arising following RF/MW exposure. In a case referenced in the LA Times, a woman
Press in reported that if someone fails to turn off their cellphone on entering her home, she gets symptoms within 2 hours:
Washington, 2017; “‘After four hours I can’t speak anymore”” (Woolston, 2010). In a case described in a 2015 Australian presentation on
Lederman, ES (Weller, 2015), “Within hours, it felt as if someone had tied a thick rubber band around her head. Then came
Weissenstein, & nausea, fatigue, ringing in her left ear–an onslaught of maladies all at once, and she had no idea why. . . . A week or
Lee, 2017); vision two into the job, whatever was affecting her wasn’t abating, and before long her speech became so jumbled that she
(Associated Press, couldn’t form a complete sentence in front of an audience. . . . She went outside to inspect the place and found no
2017a). balance fewer than 17 new ‘smart’ electricity meters strapped to the side of the building.”
(Associated Press, In a case reported to UCSD investigators, new-onset right-sided ear pain and hearing loss attended the inciting episode
2017a; Lederman, (seated for 6 hours, unknowingly, directly across the wall from a bank of multiple smart meters for a building,
Weissenstein, & slightly toward her right), along with vise-like headache, concentration problems, and two nights of no sleep
Lee, 2017). (followed by chronic lesser sleep impairment), and, abating over months, continued to be triggered, always
Nosebleeds in some exclusively or predominantly on the right side, by previously tolerated RF/MW exposures thereafter. Many months
(Associated Press in later, left ear predominant ear symptoms developed for the first time. A bank of smart meters was identified to the
Washington, 2017; left of where she had sat, hidden by plants so missed in an initial reconnaissance. That occasion, the only one with
Golden & Rotella, left predominant ear and hearing symptoms, was accompanied by speech difficulty, which resolved over about a
2018). week. In these two cases, aphasia was associated with left predominant ear symptoms (Broca’s area, damage of
which leads to expressive aphasia, is left prefrontal). It is an empirical question whether left-predominant auditory
involvement will prove more often tied to affected speech.
Balance is multifactorial, involving vision, muscle strength, and vestibular function, for example. In some media reports
of diplomat health, the term vertigo is used (Harris, 2018b, 2018c). Balance and vestibular testing were performed in
diplomats (Swanson et al., 2018). Clinical examinations and objective measures raised concern for balance problems
B. Golomb
in 81% (higher than the percent reporting subjective dizziness or balance problems) (Swanson et al., 2018).
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Vestibular function involves the same (eighth) cranial nerve as hearing. Vertigo, hearing loss, and tinnitus can arise (as
adverse effects) as a triumvirate (Porto Arceo, 2003; Sepcic et al., 2010). Dizziness more generally, in contrast to
vertigo, is a nonspecific finding that arises with many forms of brain insult, including brain hypoperfusion (low
blood flow). Of note, cerebral hypoperfusion has been reported in persons with symptoms following RF/MW
(Belpomme et al., 2015).
In some surveys of RF/MW-affected individuals, dizziness and balance are queried together (Lamech, 2014); other
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
surveys use only the term dizziness. Individual reports of balance and dizziness problems were included among
participant narrative reports in the Maine survey—for example: “‘Balance problems have worsened since installation
of the smart meter, leading to several falls”’ (Conrad & Friedman, 2013) and “‘I could not understand the dizzineness
which was scary. I actually thought I had a brain tumor all of a sudden”’ (Conrad & Friedman, 2013). The Cuba
diplomat study considered nausea as a vestibular symptom (Swanson et al., 2018). Though it need not necessarily be,
it was linked to dizziness in some RF/MW/EMR affected cases: “‘Daily nausea and dizziness”’ (Conrad &
Friedman, 2013).
Loss of balance, with dizziness and disorientation, was identified as one of six clusters of symptoms seen in each of two
smart meter surveys from different nations, with the clusters represented nearly in the same order: (1) sleep
disruption, (2) headache, (3) ringing or buzzing in ears, (4) fatigue, (5) loss of concentration, memory or learning
ability, and (6) disorientation, dizziness, or loss of balance) (Powell, 2015).
Vision: Vision is affected by oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment (see Table 4, mechanisms) (Argun et al.,
2014; Beatty, Koh, Phil, Henson, & Boulton, 2000; Javaheri, Khurana, O’Hearn T, Lai, & Sadun, 2007; King, Gottlieb,
Brooks, Murphy, & Dunaief, 2004; Liang, Green, Wang, Alssadi, & Godley, 2004; Totan et al., 2001), not just to the eye
but to cortical systems involved in vision (Pachalska et al., 2002). Effects of these mechanisms include optic nerve
damage (Javaheri et al., 2007; Qi, Lewin, Sun, Hauswirth, & Guy, 2007; Rucker, Hamilton, Bardenstein, Isada, & Lee,
2006), age-related macular degeneration (Beatty et al., 2000; Feher et al., 2005; Feher, Papale, Mannino, Gualdi, &
Balacco Gabrieli, 2003; Liang & Godley, 2003; Modi, Heckman, & Saffer, 1992; Totan et al., 2001; Yu, Wu, & Lin, 1997),
retinal thinning (Sandbach et al., 2001), and cataracts (Gul, Rahman, Hasnain, Salim, & Simjee, 2008; Karslioglu et al.,
2005; Ottonello, Foroni, Carta, Petrucco, & Maraini, 2000; Tarwadi & Agte, 2004; Taylor, Jacques, & Epstein, 1995).
Where brain swelling ensues (see Table 4), this can affect the shape of the lens, affecting vision.
2897
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Effects of RF/MW on the eye and on vision have long been reported (Birenbaum, Grosof, & Rosenthal, 1969; Bolen,
1988; Cleary, 1980; Cutz, 1989; Daily, Wakim, Herrick, Parkhill, & Benedict, 1952; McCally, Farrell, Bargeron, Kues, &
Hochheimer, 1986; Williams & Finch, 1974; Zaret, 1973). Particular attention has gone to effects on the lens, and on
cataracts. RF/MW, via oxidative mechanisms, promotes aging of the lens, which can lead to cataracts. Cataracts have
been a reported complication, sometimes in young people, among persons working with microwave radiation
(Birenbaum et al., 1969; Bolen, 1988; Cleary, 1980; McCally et al., 1986; Zaret, 1973). A Swiss study (Hassig, Jud, &
Spiess, 2012) documented increased cataracts in calves born near cell towers: “We examined and monitored a dairy
farm in which a large number of calves were born with nuclear cataracts after a mobile phone base station had been
erected in the vicinity of the barn. Calves showed a 3.5 times higher risk for heavy cataract if born there compared to
Swiss average. All usual causes such as infection or poisoning common in Switzerland could be excluded.”
Vision problems are reported in RF/MW-affected persons. In a study in Spain, in persons in proximity to two GSM
(Global System of Mobile Communications) cell tower base stations, analysis of the closer group, with exposure in
the range 0.25–1.29 V/m2, in a model adjusted for age, sex, and distance, showed that vision problems were elevated
with an odds ratio of 5.8 (95% CI 1.7–19.8, p = 0.005) (Oberfeld, Navarro, Portoles, Maestu, & Gomez-Perretta, 2004).
Eleven percent reported problems with eyes or vision in the Australian smart meter study. Since this includes
respondents who are unaffected, rates are lower than in purely symptomatic individuals (Lamech, 2014). Twenty-Six
percent of survey participants reported eye/vision problems in the Halteman smart meter impacts survey
(Halteman, 2011). Vision problems were reported by 17% as “severe and new,” by 38% as “moderate and new,” and
by 12% as “severe and worsened” in the Maine smart meter survey (Conrad & Friedman, 2013).
An assessment of neurological problems in U.S. diplomats in Cuba underscores the potential importance of eye
movement dysfunction (Swanson et al., 2018), which is also tied to oxidative and mitochondrial mechanisms (Chen,
Li, Wu, Qi, & Wu, 1998; Dodson, Patten, Hyman, & Chu, 1976; Goto, Koga, Horai, & Nonaka, 1990; Hyman, Patten, &
Dodson, 1977; Kao, 1994; Land, Hockaday, Hughes, & Ross, 1981; Pineda et al., 2004; Schaefer, Blakely, Griffiths,
Turnbull, & Taylor, 2005; Smits, Westeneng, van Hal, van Engelen, & Overeem, 2012).
B. Golomb
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Epistaxis (nosebleed): In a study in Selbitz, Bavaria, nosebleed was significantly more frequently reported (p = 0.01) in
those less than 200 m from a cell phone base station than 200 m to 400 m away (Eger & Jahn, 2010). Nosebleed was a
reported symptom in each of several surveys of ES and symptoms associated with RF/MW, including in a study of
smart meter symptoms (Conrad & Friedman, 2013; Golomb, 2015a; Halteman, 2011; Lamech, 2014) (see Table 3). The
Bamberg appeal (on behalf of 114 physicians referencing assessment of medical complaints of 356 people with
symptoms from cell tower base stations and DECT phones in their homes in Oberfranken) noted the more
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
symptoms stated that it “feels like my brain is vibrating and spinning at night—and my tinnitus gets much worse.”
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Brain swelling in 1. RF/MW may alter blood-brain barrier function via oxidative stress.
some diplomats (a) An analysis reported that of 100 peer-reviewed studies examining whether low-intensity RF/MW causes oxidative
(Associated Press in stress, 93 found that it did (Yakymenko et al., 2015).
Washington, 2017; (b) Oxidative stress disrupts the blood-brain barrier (Al Ahmad, Gassmann, & Ogunshola, 2012; Blasig, Mertsch, &
Lederman, 2017a; Haseloff, 2002; Enciu, Gherghiceanu, & Popescu, 2013; Haorah et al., 2007; Hurst, Heales, Dobbie, Barker, & Clark,
Lederman, 1998; Katsu et al., 2010; Lochhead et al., 2010; Nittby et al., 2009; Salford, Brun, Sturesson, Eberhardt, & Persson, 1994;
Weissenstein, Lee Sirav & Seyhan, 2009, 2011; Takemori, Murakami, Kometani, & Ito, 2013; Tang et al., 2015).
et al., 2017). (c) Consistent with this, blood-brain barrier disruption has been shown in multiple studies with RF/MW (Nittby et al.,
2008, 2009; Salford et al., 1994; Sirav & Seyhan, 2009; Soderqvist, Carlberg, Hansson Mild, & Hardell, 2009;
Soderqvist, Carlberg, & Hardell, 2009; Tang et al., 2015). Other studies have not shown blood-brain barrier effects (de
Gannes et al., 2009; Finnie, Blumbergs, Cai, Manavis, & Kuchel, 2006; Finnie et al., 2002; Franke, Ringelstein, &
Stogbauer, 2005; Franke, Streckert et al., 2005; Fritze et al., 1997; McQuade et al., 2009). Studies vary in many respects
(e.g., exposure duration, EMR exposure characteristics, model (in vivo versus in vitro, animal, age), delay between
exposure and blood-brain barrier assessment, and blood-brain barrier assessment used, for example). The
blood-brain barrier is functional, and barrier function need not be affected for all substances equally.
(d) Since genetics of oxidative stress management (De Luca et al., 2014) and levels of key antioxidants (Belpomme et al.,
2015) relate to both RF/MW injury and oxidative stress, these factors, together with specifics of the RF/MW
exposure, may guide blood-brain barrier disruption with RF/MW.
(e) A study that examined gene expression in the brains of rats exposed to GSM radiation, radiation that encompasses
the multiple frequencies and pulsed waveforms present in GSM exposures, identified altered gene expression of a
marker of blood-brain barrier function (Belyaev et al., 2006).
2. Altered blood-brain barrier can lead to brain edema and “malignant brain edema” (Adair, Baldwin, Kornfeld, &
Rosenberg, 1999; Witt, Mark, Sandoval, & Davis, 2008). (Oxidative stress-associated blood-brain barrier disruption is,
for instance, thought to underlie neuroleptic-induced cerebral edema (Elmorsy, Elzalabany, Elsheikha, & Smith,
2014).)
B. Golomb
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
3. Among case experiences, perceived head pressure occurs with brain swelling and is reported by many with ES. As
also noted in relation to the sensory symptom of “pressure,” some surveys collate head pressure separately from
headache (which, in some studies, it surpasses: Conrad & Friedman, 2013; Lamech, 2014; Schooneveld & Kuiper,
2007). One survey included eye pressure (Halteman, 2011), and in one, several participants spontaneously reported
ear pressure (Conrad & Friedman, 2013). Communications to the UCSD ES study included the write-in comment,
“Brain feels like it’s swelling” (Golomb, 2015a). One man with severe ES who communicated with the UCSD study
group and shared documentation of his approval for Social Security disability for his ES reported that the severe
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
brain swelling he experienced in response to EMR had led an eyeball to be pushed from the socket.
Findings are reported 1. Based on findings in an fMRI study of electrosensitive individuals it was stated that “the differential diagnosis for
to be compatible the abnormalities seen on the fMRI includes head injury” (Heuser & Heuser, 2017).
with traumatic 2. Six of the 10 ES individuals assessed reported prior head injury (Heuser & Heuser, 2017). However, 4 did not, and
brain injury (Harris, also showed evidence consistent with brain injury. Moreover, prior head injury is reported to also be present in at
2017a, 2017b, 2018c; least some, but an unstated fraction of, affected diplomats (Stone, 2018).
Harris & Goldman, 3. Head injury could predispose to ES. Head injury, like RF/MW, promotes oxidative stress, and blood-brain barrier
2017a, 2017b; disturbance; and melatonin (which is low in those with ES), protects from these effects in head injury (Dehghan,
Rogers, 2017). Khaksari Hadad, Asadikram, Najafipour, & Shahrokhi, 2013; Ding et al., 2014; Ozdemir et al., 2005; Senol &
Naziroglu, 2014), as it protects against injury from radiation (Argun et al., 2014; Bardak, Ozerturk, Ozguner, Durmus,
& Delibas, 2000; Bhatia & Manda, 2004; El-Missiry, Fayed, El-Sawy, & El-Sayed, 2007; Goswami & Haldar, 2014a,
2014b; Goswami, Sharma, & Haldar, 2013; Guney et al., 2007; Jang et al., 2013; Karaer et al., 2015; Karslioglu et al.,
2005; Kim, Shon, Ryoo, Kim, & Lee, 2001; Koc, Taysi, Buyukokuroglu, & Bakan, 2003a, 2003b; Liu, Ren, Yang, Zhao,
& Mei, 2014; Manda, Anzai, Kumari, & Bhatia, 2007; Manda & Reiter, 2010; Manda, Ueno, & Anzai, 2007, 2008;
Naziroglu, Tokat, & Demirci, 2012; Oliinyk & Meshchyshen, 2004; Ortiz et al., 2015; Sainz et al., 2008; Sener, Atasoy
et al., 2004; Sener, Jahovic, Tosun, Atasoy, & Yegen, 2003; Sharma & Haldar, 2006; Shirazi et al., 2011; Shirazi,
Mihandoost, Mohseni, Ghazi-Khansari, & Rabie Mahdavi, 2013; Taysi, Koc, Buyukokuroglu, Altinkaynak, & Sahin,
2003; Taysi et al., 2008; Vasin et al., 2004; Yilmaz & Yilmaz, 2006)—and from RF/MW . . . (Ayata et al., 2004; Aynali
et al., 2013; Koylu, Mollaoglu, Ozguner, Naziroglu, & Delibas, 2006; Lai & Singh, 1997; Meena et al., 2014; Naziroglu,
Celik et al., 2012; Oksay et al., 2012; Oktem, Ozguner, Mollaoglu, Koyu, & Uz, 2005; Ozguner, Bardak, & Comlekci,
2901
2006; Ozguner, Oktem, Armagan et al., 2005; Sokolovic et al., 2008; Tok, Naziroglu, Dogan, Kahya, & Tok, 2014; S. Xu
et al., 2010).
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
4. One RF/MW affected man who communicated with the UCSD study group indicated his ES was precipitated by a
serious occupational head injury. (He also had occupational exposure to EMR, but until the head injury, it had not
affected him.)
5. The study did not report the presence or absence of features indicative of greater severity of head injury, such as loss
of consciousness or symptoms or sequelae. Both because of this and point 5, there is no clarity about whether prior
head impacts were in fact greater in number or intensity than in the general population. But it might be expected that
past head injury would be a risk factor.
6. Given findings consistent with low melatonin in those with ES (Belpomme et al., 2015), this condition (and/or
common cause) may also predispose to more significant damage from a given impact and character of head injury, so
there is a so greater likelihood that a given head impact causes problems and is remembered and reported as a head
injury.
7. ES symptoms are sometimes experienced as similar to a head injury. For instance, a Rhode Island teacher likened
effects experienced with RF/MW to a concussion (“Math teacher raises concerns about WIFI comparing the effects to
a concussion,” 2014). Just as it is important to avoid even minor head trauma following traumatic concussion until
healing has occurred, so avoidance of RF/MW (or more generally EMR) aggravation may prove important following
pulsed RF/MW injury. RF/MW injury may be cumulative (Sadchikova & Glotova, 1973), and in addition to the
intensity-duration profile, the interval between exposures may be important in the clinical course (Zaret, 1973).
White matter In diplomats: “Medical testing has revealed that some embassy workers had apparent abnormalities in their white
abnormalities matter tracts that let different parts of the brain communicate” (Weissenstein, 2018).
reported 1. White matter changes were observed in some with ES, in the fMRI study of persons affected by RF/MW/EMR
(Weissenstein, 2018) (Heuser & Heuser, 2017).
in some diplomats. 2. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (to which RF/MW can contribute; see Table 4) are associated with
white matter injury (Back et al., 2005; Casta, Quackenbush, Houck, & Korson, 1997; Ikeda, Choi, Yee, Murata, &
Quilligan, 1999; Miller, Lawrence, Mondal, & Seegal, 2009; Miyamoto et al., 2013; Munoz-Cortes et al., 2013;
Rosenzweig & Carmichael, 2013).
B. Golomb
Diplomats’ Symptoms
and Signs Compatibility with RF/MW
Among potential mechanisms, oxidative stress increases vulnerability of proteins (and, e.g., lipids, DNA, RNA) to
autoimmune attack, which can include attacks on myelin (Gelderman et al., 2007; Iborra, Palacio, & Martinez, 2005;
Iuchi et al., 2010; Kalluri, Cantley, Kerjaschki, & Neilson, 2000; Kumagai, Jikimoto, & Saegusa, 2003; Liu et al., 2003;
Maes et al., 2013; Profumo, Buttari, & Rigano, 2011; Shah & Sinha, 2013; Wang, Cai, Ansari, & Khan, 2007).
Indeed, antibodies directed to O-myelin were reported in a subset of the 675 persons with ES who were included
in a French study (Belpomme et al., 2015), affirming one mechanism by which white matter changes might occur.
3. Following GSM radiation exposure (study cited previously), examination of gene expression in rat brain showed
alterations in myelin-related products (myelin-related glycoprotein) (Belyaev et al., 2006).
2903
Lamech, 2014; Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017; Swanson et al., 2018).
Peculiar sensory symptoms are reported in both, including pressure and vi-
brations (Conrad & Friedman, 2013; Swanson et al., 2018). Reported brain
findings have included brain swelling, problems consistent with traumatic
brain injury, and white matter abnormalities. Each such feature is also ob-
served in those with symptoms ascribed to RF/MW.
Table 3 lists symptoms commonly reported in diplomats, together with
percentages reporting each symptom, for symptoms assessed in the neuro-
Citation Study of Lamech (2014) Halteman Conrad & Santini, Kato & Golomb Schooneveld Johansson Hagstrom Durusoy,
diplomats (2011) Friedman Santini, Johansson (2015c) & Kuiper (2006); cites et al., (2013) Hassoy,
(Swanson (2013) Danze, Le (2012) (2007) Swedish- Ozkurt, &
et al., 2018) Ruz, & language Karababa
News media Seigne (2002) article (2017)
Holmboe &
Johansson
(2005)
EMR- or NA Smart meter Smart meter Smart meter Proximity to ES ES ES ES, acute ES, acute Cell phone use
ES-related exposure exposure exposure cell phone phase phase symptoms
characteristic base station during
2905
Sample char- About 24 U.S. 92 residents of 318 U.S. 210 530 people 75 Japanese 202 persons 250 Dutch 22 with 194 with ES 2150 students
acteristics and 2 Victoria, respondents respondents, living near with ES or with current respondents ES-ranked in 26 high
Canadian Australia, from 28 68% ES cellular sensitive to ES with ES symptoms; schools in
diplomats to after states (142)b phone base EMF most Turkey
Havana exposure to stations common
reporting smart meter were listed
symptoms radiation (not ranked)
attributed to
“health
attacks” in
news: 24 U.S.
embassy
community
members
with
neurological
findings
often seen
after mild
traumatic
brain in-
jury/concussion
(Swanson
et al., 2018)
All have Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
symptoms
B. Golomb
Cognitive 81%. Swanson #5 #5 #2/#4 #4, #7 #3 (81%) #3 (85%) #2, #13 Yes #7, #10 #4, #5
et al. (2018).
Also see
Lederman
(2017a);
Panetta
(2017);
Associated
Press
(2017d).
Stress 67% #11 #2 #8/#7 #6 (irritability) #9 and #10. For #6 in “initial
anxiety irritability; (agitation) “irritation” symptoms,”
irritability 57% and irritability
nervousness; “anxiety” (45%)
52% more (56% and
emotional; 55%).
29% sadness.
Swanson
et al. (2018)
Tinnitus 57% Swanson #3 #4 #3/ #2 Not queried #7 (63%) #5 (80%) Not in main Not queried
et al. (2018). (except as symptom
Also see “hearing”) list, but
Lederman, based on
Weissenstein, number
Lee et al. affected in
(2017), auditory
Panetta symptom
(2017). list, #13
B. Golomb
Diplomats Australia, 2014 Survey) Report) France, 2002 Japan, 2012 2015a 2007 Sweden, 2006 Finland, 2013 Turkey, 2017
Vision 76%. Swanson #12 #8 #10/#11 #12 — #8 in initial #6 — #13 (photosen- #10
problems et al. (2018). Symptoms sitivity)
Also see (38%)
Associated
Press (2017a).
Nausea Associated #9 #12 — — — #9 “Gastroin- — Yes #20 #15
Press in testinal “Symptoms
Washington symptoms” from the gas-
(2017); (64%). trointestinal
Lederman, Nausea not tract.”
Weissenstein, separately
Lee et al. asked.
(2017);
Panetta
(2017)
Epistaxis Not elicited #17 #13 #15 in — — “Nosebleeds” — #12 is “nose — — —
(nose bleed) in Swanson symptoms as a write-in problems.”
et al. (2018). that symptom
Mentioned in intensified. (not
news/media: New onset in queried).
Associated several
Press in write-ins.
Washington
(2017);
Golden &
Rotella
(2018).
B. Golomb
Hearing loss 43% Swanson #18 (with ear — — #5 — #11 (34%) #3 — — #14
et al. (2018). pain)
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
Also see
Associated
Press (2017b);
Associated
Press in
Washington
(2017);
Panetta
(2017);
Robles &
Semple
(2017a);
Wilkinson
(2017)
Speech Not elicitede #30 — — — — f — — — —
problems in Swanson
et al. (2018).
Mentioned in
Associated
Press in
Washington
(2017)
Comment g h i j k l
2911
Note: — = Not queried. Surveys in the smart meter era were prioritized for inclusion; proximity of emitting devices to homes may make these
more comparable to diplomat experience. Studies of ES were also prioritized, as these focus on those who are symptomatic, providing symptom
rates better suited for comparison to those in affected diplomats. Other studies on similar themes report similar findings. (An exception is that older
studies from Scandinavia that focused on exposure to video display terminals from that time report high rates of skin problems.) For instance, in
a 2007 study of 85 persons living near the first mobile phone station antenna in Menoufiya governorate, Egypt reported that “the prevalence of
neuropsychiatric complaints as headache (23.5%), memory changes (28.2%), dizziness (18.8%), tremors (9.4%), depressive symptoms (21.7%), and
sleep disturbance (23.5%) were significantly higher among exposed inhabitants than controls: (10%), (5%), (5%), (0%), (8.8%) and (10%), respectively
(P < 0.05).” Sleep, headache, and cognitive again topped the list in frequency (Abdel-Rassoul et al., 2007).
Some studies focus not on ranking, but dose-effect/distance relation. For instance, in Selbitz, Bavaria, those within 200 m of a cell phone base
station were compared on reported symptoms to those 200 m to 400 m away and were found to report significantly more sleep problems, headache,
concentration problems, “cerebral affections,” depression, auditory/vestibular problems, visual problems, GI problems, dizziness, and nosebleed
along with cardiovascular problems, joint problems, infections, and skin problems (p = 0.01 for dizziness and nosebleed, p = 0.001 for the rest; Eger
& Jahn, 2010). A 2003 survey study of the “microwave syndrome” “in Murcia, Spain, in the vicinity of a Cellular Phone Base Station working in DCS-
1800MHz” reported that symptoms included fatigue, irritability, headache, nausea, insomnia, depression, discomfort, difficulty in concentration,
memory loss, visual dysfunction, auditory dysfunction, dizziness, (and several other symptoms) (Navarro et al., 2003). These were more prevalent
within 150 m of the station, relative to more than 250 m, in most cases significantly so. It was noted that symptoms abated with removal from the
RF/MW source (Navarro et al., 2003). A follow-on study examined rates of problems in relation to measured electric fields and showed significance
for 13 of 16 assessed symptoms, with symptom odds ratios as high as 59 (Oberfeld et al., 2004).
Our rankings do not include as a symptom “onset of electromagnetic hypersensitivity syndrome” or “aggravation of electromagnetic hypersen-
sitivity syndrome.” We used the highest ranking if several cognitive queries were used (e.g., memory problems or concentration difficulties) or
several head queries were used (e.g. headache, head pressure, heat or strange sensation in head), and exclude later exemplars of the category in
ranking the lower-ranked items.
a There was no barrier to participation from outside the United States, but participants are predominantly from the United States.
b Sixty-eight percent of participants had ES (N =142) of whom 63% felt certain their exposure to smart meter was responsible for initiating the ES. Of
the 49 who were ES before smart meter exposure, all 49 (100%) stated that smart meter exposure made their ES not only worse but “much worse.”
c Though fatigue was not elicited, it is noted that a number reported a “good day bad day” pattern in which mental or physical exertion on one day
six references.
B. Golomb
g Seventy-three percent women; 93% over age 40; 43% over age 60; 78% from California; 49% characterize selves as EMF sensitive.
h The first number is severe or moderate and new; the second number is severe and new. Pressure in head and headaches were queried separately.
The overlap is uncertain. The higher ranking (pressure in head) was used. Concentration and memory were queried separately. The overlap is
uncertain. The higher ranking (concentration problems) was used.
i Memory and concentration were queried separately, ranked #4 and #7 in the original. Combined might be higher. The higher ranking is used. This
analysis provides values at different distances. Orderings for the closest distance are used. Ordering shifts slightly with longer distances, but in
general, the more frequently reported symptoms remain the more frequently reported.
j Ratings are based on (videotaped) Commonwealth Club slide presentation. Additional symptoms were elicited but not presented.
k Notes buzzing ears, hissing sounds, loss of hearing, strong low-frequency sounds, earaches, and sound of bells clanging in 96, 80, 64, 545, 38, and
28 participants
l This assesses acute symptoms. It also gives fractions of who report those symptoms before the acute phase, but it is unclear whether someone who
reports a symptom (say, headaches, dizziness) before exposure had those symptoms only occasionally.
Note: Percentages are given for diplomats (chosen for being symptomatic) and rankings for studies of persons reporting symptoms with
EMR/RF/MW (not restricted to acute stage).
2913
stress (Golomb et al., 2014; Golomb & Evans, 2008; Golomb, Koslik, & Redd,
2015), mechanisms that each promote the other (Lee & Wei, 1997; Wei &
Lee, 2002). RF/MW is tied to these mechanisms (Barnes & Greenebaum,
2015, 2016; Gao, Hu, Ma, Chen, & Zhang, 2016; Turedi et al., 2015; Yaky-
menko et al., 2015; Yuksel, Naziroglu, & Ozkaya, 2016; Zhu et al., 2014).
However the distinctive prominence of sleep and auditory symptoms, the
peculiar somatic sensory experiences of pressure and vibration, and the
noises perceived during apparent inciting episodes are relatively distinctive
Oxidative stress, mediated by Oxidative stress refers to a kind of injury against which “antioxidants” relatively protect, in which “reactive
free radicals, is involved in oxygen species” or “free radicals” produce changes/damage that can affect, for instance, lipids, proteins,
RF/MW injury. DNA, and RNA.
Mitochondria, the primary source of energy for cells (and they regulate many other phenomena such as
steroid hormone production and apoptosis) are a leading source and target of oxidative stress (Gruber,
Schaffer, & Halliwell, 2008; Kowald, 2001; Lee & Wei, 1997; Sastre, Pallardo, & Vina, 2003; Wei, 1998). That is,
mitochondrial injury not infrequently accompanies oxidative stress and has been shown with RF/MW (see
below).
RF/MW produces oxidative stress. As above, in an analysis of 100 studies examining if low-level RF/MW
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
produced oxidative injury, it was reported that about 93 found that it did (Yakymenko et al., 2015).
Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction are implicated in the symptoms and health effects that have
been reported by diplomats and RF/MW-affected persons (Adamczyk-Sowa et al., 2014; Berr, Balansard,
Arnaud, Roussel, & Alperovitch, 2000; Bonne & Muller, 2000; Brubaker, Mohney, & Pulido, 2009; Carelli,
Ross-Cisneros, & Sadun, 2002; Feng et al., 2010; Fetoni et al., 2013; Finsterer, 2008; Fukui et al., 2002;
Hoshino, Tamaoka, Ohkoshi, Shoji, & Goto, 1997; Ikeda-Douglas, Zicker, Estrada, Jewell, & Milgram, 2004;
Insel, Moore, Vidrine, & Montgomery, 2012; Jeyakumar, Williamson, Brickman, Krakovitz, & Parikh, 2009;
Kilic, Selek, Erel, & Aksoy, 2008; Koga & Nataliya, 2005; Koillinen, Jaaskelainen, & Koski, 2009; Kuruppu &
Matthews, 2013; Liang et al., 2004; Manwaring et al., 2007; Massin et al., 1995; Neri et al., 2006; Ottonello
et al., 2000; Reynolds, Laurie, Mosley, & Gendelman, 2007; Riordan-Eva, 2000; Rosen, 2008; Sandbach et al.,
2001; Savastano, Brescia, & Marioni, 2007; Seidman, Khan, Bai, Shirwany, & Quirk, 2000; Sharma et al., 2013;
Someya et al., 2009; Tiwari & Chopra, 2013; Vurucu et al., 2013; D. Wallace, 2001; Yamasoba et al., 2007;
Zhang et al., 2013; Zoric et al., 2008). For instance, oxidative stress is tied to tinnitus, antioxidants modestly
alleviate it, and markers of oxidative stress in tinnitus are reported to be greater in jugular blood (near the
ear) than the more commonly measured brachial blood (Neri et al., 2006; Savastano et al., 2007; Van
Campen, Murphy, Franks, Mathias, & Toraason, 2002).
Two findings substantially cement a role for oxidative stress in RF/MW health effects. First, persons who are
“electrosensitive” (i.e., who experience symptoms at levels of radiation that many others tolerate) are
significantly more likely to harbor gene variants that confer less avid protection against oxidative injury (De
Luca et al., 2014). This is an extremely important finding. People cannot manipulate their genes in response
to suggestibility and did not know their genes when they reported their sensitivity status. This powerfully
2915
Second, a French study in electrically and chemically sensitive individuals (93% with ES), found consistently
low levels of a urinary melatonin metabolite (Belpomme et al., 2015). Since melatonin is an antioxidant that
protects against damage to many toxins, but has been shown in numerous studies to be particularly vital for
defense specifically against oxidation injury due to radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum (Argun
et al., 2014; Bhatia & Manda, 2004; El-Missiry et al., 2007; Goswami & Haldar, 2014b; Goswami et al., 2013;
Griefahn, Kunemund, Blaszkewicz, Lerchl, & Degen, 2002; Guney et al., 2007; Imaida et al., 2000; Jang et al.,
2013; Karaer et al., 2015; Karslioglu et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2001; Koc, Taysi, Buyukokuroglu, & Bakan, 2003a,
2003b; Manda, Anzai et al., 2007; Manda & Reiter, 2010; Manda et al., 2008; Naziroglu, Tokat, & Demirci,
2012; Ortiz et al., 2015; Sener, Atasoy et al., 2004; Sener, Jahovic et al., 2003; Sharma & Haldar, 2006; Shirazi
et al., 2011, 2013; Taysi et al., 2003, 2008; Vasin et al., 2004; Yilmaz & Yilmaz, 2006), including due to RF/MW
(Ayata et al., 2004; Aynali et al., 2013; Koylu et al., 2006; Lai & Singh, 1997; Meena et al., 2014; Naziroglu,
Celik et al., 2012; Oksay et al., 2012; Oktem et al., 2005; Ozguner et al., 2006; Ozguner, Oktem, Armagan
et al., 2005; Sokolovic et al., 2008, 2013; Tok et al., 2014), this dovetails with the genetic data to compellingly
support a role for oxidative stress and to show that that those with ES (those who experience symptoms
with radiation that others tolerate) are also experiencing greater cellular and subcellular injury from this
radiation.
Many studies show the importance of antioxidant defenses, including melatonin, in protection against
RF/MW injury. For instance, melatonin and, to a lesser degree, caffeic acid protect against cell
phone–induced oxidative stress in rats, and melatonin increased the activity of other endogenous
antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase, which were
depressed with the cell phone radiation (Ozguner et al., 2006). Melatonin protected against laryngotracheal
oxidative injury from wireless (2.45 GHz) radiation in rats (Aynali et al., 2013). It also protected against skin
oxidative injury in an experimental mobile phone model in rats (Ayata et al., 2004). It protected against 900
MHz microwave radiation–induced lipid peroxidation in rats (Koylu et al., 2006); reversed the oxidative
damage of microwaves to rat testes including protecting testosterone level and sperm count, and protecting
against DNA fragmentation (a marker of cell death) (Meena et al., 2014) and protected against oxidative
damage from cell phone radiation to rat brain (Sokolovic et al., 2008). Melatonin protects against oxidative
damage from Wi-Fi to the lens of rats (Tok et al., 2014). Vitamins E and C protect against “900 MHz
radiofrequency-induced histopathologic changes and oxidative stress in rat endometrium” (Guney,
Ozguner, Oral, Karahan, & Mungan, 2007). Ginkgo biloba protected against cell phone–induced oxidative
B. Golomb
Antioxidants work together, for instance, to recycle one another to the reduced form in which they are active
as antioxidants. The importance of antioxidant defenses in protection against radiation injury from RF/MW
extends what is well known for injury from radiation throughout the electromagnetic spectrum, including
so-called ionizing radiation (which includes gamma)—for instance, “A positive correlation was found
between GPx activity, glutathione content and cell survival following ionizing irradiation”; Bravard et al.,
2002). Glutathione depletion increased with gamma radiation–induced DNA damage (Dutta, Chakraborty,
Saha, Ray, & Chatterjee, 2005) and cell death (Dethmers & Meister, 1981). Glutathione determined the
survival “shoulder” for X-ray radiation in hypoxic cells (Evans, Taylor, & Brown, 1984), and melatonin
protected against X-ray-induced lung injury (Jang et al., 2013). Melatonin protected against
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
radiation–induced cataract (Karslioglu et al., 2005) and increased activity of other critical antioxidant
enzymes, SOD and GPx. SOD protected against fractionated radiation–induced esophagitis (and reduced
the effect of that radiation on glutathione) (Epperly et al., 2001). Melatonin protected against UVB
radiation-induced oxidative skin injury (Goswami & Haldar, 2014a, 2014b), as did glutathione (Hanada,
Gange, & Connor, 1990) and chocolate, which is rich in antioxidant polyphenols (Williams, Tamburic, &
Lally, 2009). Melatonin has specifically been reported to protect the inner ear against radiation injury in rats
exposed to “radiotherapy” at 4 KHz to 6 KHz (Karaer et al., 2015)
A role for oxidative stress in radiation injury transcends labels of “ionizing” versus “nonionizing,” and
“thermal” versus “nonthermal” radiation. For this reason, those labels are of questionable utility in
understanding radiation damage.
Radiation may depress A number of studies report that EMR, including but not limited to RF/MW, can depress melatonin (Bergqvist
melatonin—more so in et al., 1997; Burch, Reif, & Yost, 1999, 2008; Fernie, Bird, & Petitclerc, 1999; Griefahn et al., 2002; Halgamuge,
some—and, in part through 2013; Qin et al., 2012; Reiter, 1993a, 1994; Weydahl, Sothern, Cornélissen, & Wetterberg, 2000). Evidence
depressed melatonin, may suggests that (like virtually all other biological effects), a subgroup is more vulnerable (Parry et al., 2010;
depress other antioxidants Wood, Loughran, & Stough, 2006). (Note that sunlight, which provides EMR of a kind “expected”
evolutionarily, is well recognized to govern (depress) melatonin, toward producing day-night and seasonal
effects.)
Light (a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum) inhibits melatonin as part of establishing circadian and
seasonal rhythms (Gammack, 2008; Glickman, Byrne, Pineda, Hauck, & Brainard, 2006; Navara & Nelson,
2007). Evolution did not plan for man-made radiation sources, and one hypothesis is that such radiation
sources may induce similar effects in some people.
2917
“EMF [electromagnetic fields] are known to affect Ca2+ homeostasis and suppress melatonin activity in a
wide wavelength range. Ca2+ ions in pinealocytes are involved in regulation of cAMP synthesis that
mediates conversion of serotonin into melatonin. Their leakage from pinealocytes results in a decrease of the
cAMP level and thereby suppresses production of melatonin” (Rapoport & Breus, 2011). Longterm radar
workers reportedly have increased serotonin and depressed melatonin, consistent with this impaired
conversion and effects in the RF/MW frequency range (Singh, Mani, & Kapoor, 2015). Electronic repair
workers have also been reported to have lower melatonin than controls and more sleep problems (El-Helaly
& Abu-Hashem, 2010).
Melatonin and its derivatives, though better known for effects on sleep, provide a critical antioxidant defense
system that protects against toxicity of an extraordinary array of toxins and conditions (Abdel Moneim et al.,
2015; Antunes Wilhelm, Ricardo Jesse, Folharini Bortolatto, & Wayne Nogueira, 2013; Bandyopadhyay,
Ghosh, Bandyopadhyay, & Reiter, 2004; Baxi, Singh, Vachhrajani, & Ramachandran, 2013; Chabra,
Shokrzadeh, Naghshvar, Salehi, & Ahmadi, 2014; Chen, Gao, Li, Shen, & Sun, 2005; Ebaid, Bashandy,
Alhazza, Rady, & El-Shehry, 2013; El-Missiry et al., 2014; Fuentes-Broto et al., 2010; Garcia-Rubio, Matas, &
Miguez, 2005; Jindal, Garg, Mediratta, & Fahim, 2011; Korkmaz, Uzun, Cakatay, & Aydin, 2012; Laothong
et al., 2010; Mehta et al., 2014; Melchiorri et al., 1995; Montilla, Vargas et al., 1998; Ochoa et al., 2011; Othman
et al., 2014; Shokrzadeh et al., 2014; Skaper, Floreani, Ceccon, Facci, & Giusti, 1999; Sousa & Castilho, 2005;
Souza et al., 2014; Thomas & Mohanakumar, 2004; Uygur et al., 2013; S. C. Xu et al., 2010; L. Zhang et al.,
2013; Aranda et al., 2010; Carrillo-Vico et al., 2005; Das, Belagodu, Reiter, Ray, & Banik, 2008; El-Sokkary,
Nafady, & Shabash, 2010; Esrefoglu, Gul, Ates, & Selimoglu, 2006; Esrefoglu, Gul, Emre, Polat, & Selimoglu,
2005; Fagundes, Gonzalo, Arruebo, Plaza, & Murillo, 2010; Y. K. Gupta, Gupta, & Kohli, 2003; Hu, Yin, Jiang,
Huang, & Shen, 2009; Kacmaz et al., 2005; Kerman et al., 2005; Omurtag, Tozan, Sehirli, & Sener, 2008;
Ozacmak, Barut, & Ozacmak, 2009; Ozacmak, Sayan, Arslan, Altaner, & Aktas, 2005; Ozcelik, Soyoz, &
Kilinc, 2004; Rao & Chhunchha, 2010; Rezzani, Buffoli, Rodella, Stacchiotti, & Bianchi, 2005; Sadir, Deveci,
Korkmaz, & Oter, 2007; Sahna, Parlakpinar, Turkoz, & Acet, 2005; Sahna, Parlakpinar, Vardi, Cigremis, &
Acet, 2004; Saravanan, Sindhu, & Mohanakumar, 2007; Suke et al., 2006; Tunez, Montilla, Del Carmen
Munoz, Feijoo, & Salcedo, 2004; Wang, Wei, Wang et al., 2005; Wang, Wei, Zhang et al., 2005; Watanabe et al.,
2004; Zavodnik et al., 2004) (Abdel-Wahab, Arafa, El-Mahdy, & Abdel-Naim, 2002; Bagchi et al., 2001;
B. Golomb
Behan, McDonald, Darlington, & Stone, 1999; Bruck et al., 2004; Cadenas & Barja, 1999; Chen, Lin, & Chiu,
2003; Dabbeni-Sala, Floreani, Franceschini, Skaper, & Giusti, 2001; El-Sokkary, 2000; Gazi, Altun, & Erdogan,
2006; Hara et al., 2001; Herrera et al., 2001; Karbownik & Reiter, 2002; Lankoff, Banasik, & Nowak, 2002;
Martin et al., 2002; Mayo, Tan, Sainz, Lopez-Burillo, & Reiter, 2003; Mayo, Tan, Sainz, Natarajan et al., 2003;
Montilla, Tunez, Munoz de Agueda, Gascon, & Soria, 1998; Mor et al., 2003; Morishima et al., 1998, 1999;
Ortega-Gutierrez et al., 2002; Othman, El-Missiry, & Amer, 2001; Popov et al., 2015; Princ, Maxit, Cardalda,
Batlle, & Juknat, 1998; Sener, Kacmaz et al., 2003; Sener, Paskaloglu et al., 2004; Sener, Sehirli, &
Ayanoglu-Dulger, 2003; Shen et al., 2002; Shifow, Kumar, Naidu, & Ratnakar, 2000; Shokrzadeh et al., 2015;
Soyoz, Ozcelik, Kilinc, & Altuntas, 2004; Spadoni et al., 2006; Sutken et al., 2007; Tomas-Zapico et al., 2002;
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
Age-related involution of the pineal gland may help to explain why more middle-aged persons are reportedly
affected by ES than younger people (Gruber, Palmquist, & Nordin, 2018), though presumably younger
adults may be more exposed to technology. (Older persons, however, may have had more years of EMR
exposure and injury may be cumulative (Sadchikova & Glotova, 1973).)
Melatonin supports the levels and activity of other antioxidants, including in the setting of radiation exposures
(Karslioglu et al., 2005; Ozguner et al., 2006; Tok et al., 2014). Modest exposure to oxidative stressors
(including from radiation) in persons or animals or plants whose system is not overwhelmed can lead to
antioxidant upregulation, a phenomenon called oxidative preconditioning, seen with many sources of limited
oxidative stress, including limited exposure to radiation (Chen, 2006). In part because of this, the net effect of
an oxidant exposure on antioxidant levels depends on factors like intensity and duration of exposure, other
oxidative exposure (so, mitochondrial dysfunction state), and the status of antioxidant defenses, as well as
time from exposure to assessment. Some studies in some systems show antioxidant upregulation (Irmak
et al., 2002) or mixed direction effects on different antioxidants (Tok et al., 2014), but many show depression
of assessed antioxidants following EMR exposure (Duan et al., 2013; Goswami & Haldar, 2014a, 2014b;
Martinez-Samano, Torres-Duran, Juarez-Oropeza, Elias-Vinas, & Verdugo-Diaz, 2010) or specifically
RF/MW exposure (Akpinar, Ozturk, Ozen, Agar, & Yargicoglu, 2012; Bahreymi Toossi et al., 2017; Ceyhan
et al., 2012; Esmekaya, Ozer, & Seyhan, 2011; Guney et al., 2007; Megha et al., 2015; Ozguner, Altinbas et al.,
2005; Oktem et al., 2005; Ozguner et al., 2006; Ozguner, Oktem, Armagan et al., 2005; Ozguner, Oktem,
Ayata, Koyu, & Yilmaz, 2005; Tok et al., 2014; Yurekli et al., 2006). Such depressions, coupled with melatonin
depressions, may increase vulnerability to future EMR exposures, particularly where genetics provide for
less effective variants of one or more antioxidants (De Luca et al., 2014).
It is expected that mitochondrial impairment (J. Gruber et al., 2008; Lee & Wei, 1997; Sastre et al., 2003; Wei,
1998) or brain inflammation (sometimes itself a result of oxidative stress, amenable to reduction with
melatonin; Guney et al., 2007; Halliday, 2005), since associated with greater production of free radicals and
an expected less favorable balance of oxidative stress to antioxidant defenses, may be a risk factor for
problems with the added oxidative stress from RF/MW or from the depression in antioxidant defenses to
which RF/MW may contribute.
B. Golomb
RF/MW may depress RF/MW is reported to depress butyrylcholinesterase (McRee, 1980), a key xenobiotic defense; low levels are
xenobiotic protections tied to higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality (Calderon-Margalit, Adler, Abramson, Gofin, & Kark,
2006).
Oxidative stress contributes to Oxidative stress contributes to multiple documented auxiliary mechanisms of RF/MW damage that likely
auxiliary mechanisms of contribute to health effects in subsets, including membrane alterations—cell membranes (Benderitter,
radiation injury, such as Vincent-Genod, Pouget, & Voisin, 2003) and mitochondrial membranes (Shonai et al., 2002; Thomas,
mitochondrial dysfunction. Gebicki, & Dean, 1989; Vayssier-Taussat et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2002), blood-brain barrier disruption (Al
Ahmad et al., 2012; Barichello et al., 2011; Freeman & Keller, 2012; Gasche, Copin, Sugawara, Fujimura, &
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
Chan, 2001; Haorah, Knipe, Leibhart, Ghorpade, & Persidsky, 2005; Haorah et al., 2007; Hurst et al., 1998;
Lochhead et al., 2010; Nittby et al., 2009; Salford et al., 1994; Zehendner et al., 2013), effects on voltage gated
calcium channels (Cui et al., 2012) affected by and affecting oxidative stress—(Nishiyama, Nakano, &
Hitomi, 2010; Pall, 2015)—but also on voltage-gated anion channels that are an important part of the outer
mitochondrial membrane (Ferrer, 2009) potentially contributing to mitochondrial impairment and
amplification of oxidative stress, EEG spiking (Naziroglu, Celik et al., 2012), impaired mitochondrial
function (Aitken, Bennetts, Sawyer, Wiklendt, & King, 2005; Xu et al., 2010)—bidirectionally related to
oxidative stress (Houston, Nixon, King, De Iuliis, & Aitken, 2016; Mancuso, Coppede, Migliore, Siciliano, &
Murri, 2006; Wei & Lee, 2002)—and protected by melatonin (Tan, Manchester, Qin, & Reiter, 2016), impaired
blood flow—e.g., via oxidative stress-driven endothelial dysfunction (Engin, Sepici-Dincel, Gonul, & Engin,
2012; Indik, Goldman, & Gaballa, 2001; Jarasuniene & Simaitis, 2003; Loscalzo, 2002), autoantibodies (Ahsan,
Ali, & Ali, 2003; Fiorini et al., 2013; Gilgun-Sherki, Melamed, & Offen, 2004; Kirkham et al., 2011; Kumagai
et al., 2003; Maes et al., 2013; Ryan, Nissim, & Winyard, 2014), and apoptosis (Aoki et al., 2001; Bresgen et al.,
2003; Espino et al., 2010; Filomeni, Cardaci, Da Costa Ferreira, Rotilio, & Ciriolo, 2011; France-Lanord,
Brugg, Michel, Agid, & Ruberg, 1997; Li et al., 2015; Li et al., 2008; Salido & Rosado, 2009; Yalcinkaya et al.,
2009; Zhang, Zhang, Rabbani, Jackson, & Vujaskovic, 2012)—programmed cell death, which in turn triggers
inflammation and coagulation activation (Reutelingsperger & van Heerde, 1997). Laboratory correlates for
some of these were reported in ES participants in the French study: about 15% of those with ES had elevated
markers of blood-brain barrier permeability; 29% in those with ES (23% in those with ES and multiple
chemical sensitivity, MCS) had antibodies to O-myelin (Belpomme et al., 2015).
2921
Table 4: Continued.
Melatonin considerations: While depressions in a melatonin metabolite were the norm in participants with ES in a French study
RF/MW/EMR versus (Belpomme et al., 2015), this need not necessarily be the case for diplomats, even if a related cause (pulsed
diplomats RF/MW) and related processes (e.g., tied to oxidative stress) are involved in symptom induction. In persons
with “ES,” lowered defenses are needed for nominally modest exposures to produce problems. But if
exposures in affected diplomats were more intense or otherwise injurious, lowered defenses would not be
required to produce injury. To evaluate this, it may be prudent to assess urine melatonin metabolites at the
time diplomats are identified with symptoms.
Psychogenic illness has been Psychogenic causation has been repeatedly suggested as the basis for diplomats’ symptoms (Buckley & Harris,
dismissed 2018; Myers, 2018; Stone, 2017). This has been correctly dismissed, however, for the Cuba and China
diplomats (Harris, 2018c; Stone, 2018; Swanson et al., 2018).
Psychogenic causation has similarly been suggested for symptoms from RF/MW (Maisch, 2012) and has been
similarly repudiated (Aschermann, 2009; Tressider, 2017). The Swiss Telecom-funded study that
documented a relation of sleep problems to transmitter field strength also showed that symptoms were not
related to a health-worrying personality (Altpeter et al., 1995; Lamech, 2014). The concordance of symptom
profiles across studies, the emergence of RF/MW problems in people unaware of the exposure or its
potential for problems, the concordance of symptoms and objective signs with known documented
mechanisms of RF/MW injury, the presence of objective markers, and ties to genetics that each cohere with
known mechanisms of RF/MW injury (Belpomme et al., 2015; De Luca et al., 2014; Havas et al., 2010)
effectively preclude a psychogenic basis for the problem—were such a diagnosis meaningful. (See below, in
the entry for study inconsistency, for provocation studies.)
The notion that chronic symptoms can arise from psychogenic sources dates to Freud, who also pioneered the
flaws associated with its application (Crews, 2017). The foundation is substantially circular, a mechanism
has never been physiologically defined or substantiated (much less documented to be operating in cases
where the label is applied), and the label is deployed without the most basic scrutiny of the tacit
assumptions (Golomb, 2015b). Historically, many conditions that were presumed psychogenic (such as
ulcers, seizures) were recognized as organic as evidence emerged (Golomb, 2015b).
B. Golomb
Not all are affected—a subset How might some people experience symptoms and signs of injury from what seem to be “low levels” of an
of embassy personnel exposure, seemingly well below levels that other people tolerate? For toxins, we designate an LD50 (Baiomy,
(Stone, 2018) and of RF/MW Attia, Soliman, & Makrum, 2015; Jagetia & Baliga, 2003; Jagetia, Venkatesh, & Baliga, 2004; Pal & Chatterjee,
exposed 2006; Shafiee et al., 2010; Shimoda, Akahane, Nomura, & Kato, 1996) (dose lethal in 50%) or an LD5. This
reflects the recognition that for each potentially toxic exposure, there is a range in which some will
experience an outcome and others will not. One can also define an SD50 (symptoms in 50%)—or an SD25, or
SD5. It would be surprising if a highly useful and lucrative technology were not pushed as far into this
intensity range as possible. Genetic variations in a range of free radical detoxification systems, competition
for those systems, alterations in gene expression based on prior exposures, differences in vulnerability of the
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
tissue affected (via factors like mitochondrial “heteroplasmy,” past injury of that organ), and variations in
secondary mechanisms triggered by oxidative stress provide among the mechanisms by which variability is
produced.
The de facto intensity of the “same” exposure may differ radically (no pun intended) from person to person.a
A further mode of variability arises from immune activation. Considering a more familiar allergen, one
person can eat a jar of peanut butter without a problem, while another is hospitalized for exposure to a
crumb of peanut. As above, oxidative stress can modify substances in a fashion that makes them vulnerable
to autoimmune attack. Immune or autoimmune activation is a documented feature in a subset of those
citing symptoms from RF/MW/EMR (Belpomme et al., 2015).
Effect modification “Effect modification” refers to differences in effect in different individuals, and it is the rule rather than the
exception in biology. Particular considerations are germane when the exposure has potential for prooxidant
or antioxidant effects (Golomb, 2018). Many prooxidants can be antioxidant at low doses in some people (via
“oxidative preconditioning” in which low-level exposure to prooxidants may upregulate native antioxidant
defenses; this can lead to net antioxidant effects in persons whose defenses are not already overwhelmed or
maximally upregulated—as above). Conversely, many substances thought of as antioxidants are prooxidant
in some settings, often including high dose (Azam, Hadi, Khan, & Hadi, 2003; Bowry, Mohr, Cleary, &
Stocker, 1995; Gerster, 1999; Hiramoto, Ohkawa, Oikawa, & Kikugawa, 2003; Hu, Chen, & Lin, 1995;
Kontush, Finckh, Karten, Kohlschutter, & Beisiegel, 1996; Lee, Kim, Park, Chung, & Jang, 2003; Palozza,
Luberto, Calviello, Ricci, & Bartoli, 1997; Young & Lowe, 2001). So the same exposure can produce even
opposite-direction effects in different persons. Exemplifying the principle, statin cholesterol-lowering drugs
are net antioxidant in many people (often tested in nonelderly males without metabolic syndrome factors),
2923
but are reproducibly prooxidant in a subset, and prooxidant dominance is tied to side effects (Sinzinger,
Lupattelli, & Chehne, 2000; Sinzinger, Lupattelli, Chehne, Oguogho, & Furberg, 2001). These side effects,
attended by net prooxidant effect (Sinzinger et al., 2000; Sinzinger et al., 2001) arise disproportionately with
higher doses and in persons with conditions like older age and metabolic syndrome factors, that are
statistically tied to mitochondrial impairment (Golomb & Evans, 2008). Side effects, too, occur
disproportionately in women (Golomb & Evans, 2008). Women show higher rates of adverse effects from
many drugs and environmental toxins (and many medical procedures); they are also more often affected by
EMR (Gruber et al., 2018; Levallois et al., 2002; Röösli, Möser, Baldinini, Meier, & Braun-Fahrlander, 2004;
Santini et al., 2002; Schooneveld & Kuiper, 2007).
There are many potential sources of effect modification from genetics (De Luca et al., 2014), level of exposure,
and past and current environment that influence biology. Some exposures may cause mitochondrial injury
or oxidative stress or depress concentrations of antioxidants, boosting vulnerability. Others may have
protective effects.
Chemical exposures may serve Many drugs and chemical exposures cause oxidative stress, cause mitochondrial injury (which also increases
as one source of effect intracellular oxidative stress), depress antioxidant defenses, and/or compete for or inhibit detoxification
modification systems. Through these and other mechanisms, these exposures may magnify harm from RF/MW and vice
versa. Preliminary evidence comparing Swedish ES-affected persons versus controls identifies higher levels
of some organic pollutants in those with ES (Hardell et al., 2008), though larger studies are needed.
Chemical exposures that cause oxidative stress compete for or inhibit detoxification systems may magnify
harm from RF/MW and vice versa.
Melatonin and glutathione (and other antioxidants) can be “radioprotective” (Bravard et al., 2002; Jensen &
Meister, 1983; Shirazi et al., 2013; Simone, Tamba, & Quintiliani, 1983). (Here the root radio refers to
radiation, not specifically to radiofrequency radiation.) Other agents or conditions can be “radiosensitizing.”
As might be expected, glutathione depletion can be radiosensitizing, though the status of other antioxidants
may be important (Hodgkiss, Stratford, & Watfa, 1989; Koch & Skov, 1994; Vallis, 1991; Vos, van der Schans,
& Roos-Verheij, 1986). The tie between low melatonin (assessed by the principal metabolite) and ES in the
French study (Belpomme et al., 2015) supports the expectation that melatonin depletion is radiosensitizing
as well. Radiosensitization is used therapeutically to enhance killing by radiation of tumor cells (Yi, Ding,
Jin, Ni, & Wang, 1994), but its existence there is a reminder that chemicals interact with radiation to modify
B. Golomb
radiation effects. Radiation itself may be radiosensitizing—as potential effects on antioxidant systems,
reviewed elsewhere, suggest—and reportedly ultrahigh-frequency radiation is a particularly effective
radiosensitizer (Holt, 1995). Oxidative stress is an important, but not the only, means by which
radiosensitization occurs (Park et al., 2005), consistent with multiple downstream mechanisms of injury.
Of note, because critical systems that are involved in radiation defense (e.g., melatonin, glutathione, and other
antioxidant systems) are also involved in defense against toxicity of chemicals and drugs (Mitchell & Russo,
1987) and because factors that adversely affect antioxidant:oxidant balance may be adverse for oxidative
stress–mediated injury from either type of source, it is expected, as it is observed, that there will be overlap
between chemical and electrical sensitivity (Belpomme et al., 2015; Golomb, 2015a).
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
Two illustrations where we can see the radiosensitizing effect occur with ultraviolet (uv) light, since due to its
high frequency, the effect is primarily on the skin. Photosensitizing agents and radiation recall are the
illustrations.
Photosensitizing or phototoxic or photoallergic agents are agents that magnify damage observed with uv
radiation. (For simplicity we use photosensitizing to encompass each of these.) In some cases, radiation breaks
down a chemical to something toxic. Drugs may also photosensitize, for instance, by augmenting one of the
mechanisms of radiation injury, such as oxidative stress or mitochondrial dysfunction (Shea, Wimberly, &
Hasan, 1986). Fluoroquinolone antibiotics, which can cause serious problems in a vulnerable subset through
oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (Golomb et al., 2015), are strongly reported to photosensitize
and to be phototoxic (Agrawal, Ray, Farooq, Pant, & Hans, 2007; Akter et al., 1998; Bilski, Martinez, Koker, &
Chignell, 1996; Boccumini, Fowler, Campbell, Puertolas, & Kaidbey, 2000; Burdge, Nakielna, & Rabin, 1995;
Chetelat, Albertini, & Gocke, 1996; Ferguson & Johnson, 1990, 1993; Fujita & Matsuo, 1994; Granowitz, 1989;
Kimura, Kawada, Kobayashi, Hiruma, & Ishibashi, 1996; Man, Murphy, & Ferguson, 1999; Nedorost,
Dijkstra, & Handel, 1989; Oliveira, Goncalo, & Figueiredo, 2000; Scheife, Cramer, & Decker, 1993; Snyder &
Cooper, 1999; Trisciuoglio et al., 2002; Wagai & Tawara, 1991; Wagai, Yamaguchi, Sekiguchi, & Tawara, 1990).
Fluoroquinolones have been tied to development of persistent phototoxicity (following withdrawal of the
drug; Sailer et al., 2011)—that is, ongoing higher vulnerability to this radiation—consistent with evidence
that a vulnerable group experiences persistent damage from fluoroquinolones in which oxidative stress and
mitochondrial injury play a role (Golomb et al., 2015). This “vulnerability” may be acquired, as
mitochondrial injury can be cumulative, and a serious reaction sometimes follows a previous course of
2925
fluoroquinolones with a milder and time-limited reaction or none at all (Golomb et al., 2015). (Mitochondrial
injury from radiation can also be cumulative; Prithivirajsingh et al., 2004.) Fluoroquinolones have led to
reported “photosensitivity” reactions to fluorescent lighting (Jaffe & Bush, 1999). Statins, which as elsewhere
are sometimes prooxidant (Sinzinger et al., 2001) and sometimes mitochondrially toxic (Golomb & Evans,
2008), are also sometimes linked to photosensitivity (Morimoto, Kawada, Hiruma, Ishibashi, & Banba, 1995;
Thual, Penven, Chevallier, Dompmartin, & Leroy, 2005). (The information that follows about
photosensitivity in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome explains one reason that statins can be prooxidant, though
they also have antioxidant mechanisms.)
Given oxidative mechanisms of radiation injury that apply across the electromagnetic spectrum, it is expected
that some agents that photosensitize may sensitize to other forms of radiation, potentially including
RF/MW. Others have noted that photosensitizing drugs have played an apparent role in other radiation
injury (Dawson, Brown, & Tellefsen, 2009). (Data we have presented, but not published, showed that past
use of fluoroquinolones was significantly tied to the development of ES. Past adverse effects to
fluoroquinolones, which signify oxidative-mitochondrial injury to a point producing symptoms (at least,
they surpassed the symptom threshold for a time), showed a particularly strong connection (Golomb,
2015a).)
There are also disease conditions tied to the magnified photosensitivity (Murphy, 2001). Where these are tied
to depressed antioxidant defenses, or increased mitochondrial injury, they might be predicted to be tied to
increased risk of ES development (accounting for radiation exposure). In Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,
which many studies have tied to photosensitivity, cholesterol levels are low (Anstey, 1999, 2001, 2006; Anstey,
Azurdia, Rhodes, Pearse, & Bowden, 2005; Anstey et al., 1999; Anstey & Taylor, 1999; Azurdia, Anstey, &
Rhodes, 2001; Charman et al., 1998; Chignell, Kukielczak, Sik, Bilski, & He, 2006; Eapen, 2007; Martin,
Taylor, Trehan, Baron, & Anstey, 2006; “[A new congenital photosensitivity syndrome. Smith-Lemili-Opitz
syndrome],” 1999). Cholesterol transports critical fat-soluble antioxidants (Golomb & Evans, 2008).
In the phenomenon of “radiation recall,” injury to tissue initially caused by radiation can be made to reappear
by another agent with shared mechanisms of injury (e.g., oxidative stress and mitochondrial injury), such as
fluoroquinolone antibiotics, best recognized for skin reactions, since we are able to see these (Cho,
Breedlove, & Gunning, 2008; Jain, Agarwal, Laskar, Gupta, & Shrivastava, 2008; Wernicke, Swistel, Parashar,
& Myskowski, 2010).
B. Golomb
Hypothesis: One possible Evidence supports a relationship between genetics of intellectual promise, and a different condition in which
vulnerable group oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment play a critical role: autism spectrum disorder (ASD; Frye,
Delatorre et al., 2013; Frye, Melnyk, & Macfabe, 2013; Frye & Rossignol, 2011; Rose et al., 2012; Rossignol &
Frye, 2012). (EMR exposure has been considered as a possible factor (Herbert & Sage, 2013a, 2013b.) It was
found that gene profiles that increase risk of ASD (polygenic risk) are tied to higher intelligence in the
general population (Clarke et al., 2015): “We report that polygenic risk for ASD is positively correlated with
general cognitive ability (beta = 0.07, P = 6 × 10−7 . . .), logical memory and verbal intelligence,” findings
that were replicated in a different sample by positive relation to full-scale IQ (Clarke et al., 2015). This
supports a line of reasoning by which impaired cell energy, through oxidative stress and mitochondrial
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
dysfunction, may disproportionately affect the “best and the brightest,” on whom society differentially
depends—with implications for vulnerability to RF/MW. Many mechanisms tied to high function are tied to
high energy demand. Higher energy demand may create greater vulnerability in the setting of impaired
energy supply. (It is the chasm between demand and that guides degree of injury.)
Many drugs and chemical exposures cause oxidative stress, cause mitochondrial injury (which also increases
intracellular oxidative stress), depress antioxidant defenses, and/or compete for or inhibit detoxification
systems. Through these and other mechanisms, these exposures may magnify harm from RF/MW and vice
versa.
Are provocation studies Several so-called provocation studies have been conducted in persons with ES; some focus on symptoms,
contributory? some on objective markers. In most of those that focus on symptoms, those with ES fail to reliably
distinguish between blinded EMR “exposed” and “unexposed” settings (Rubin, Das Munshi, & Wessely,
2005). Major flaws in the designs have been recognized and reviewed by others (Leszczynski, 2015;
Schooneveld & Kuiper, 2007); for instance, studies assume that the details of exposure and time course do
not need to be individualized, which is contrary to the evidence.
But there are further problems. The most fundamental is the assumption that in ES, symptoms serve as a
meter. This is invalid. Consider the analogy of sunburn: a form of radiation injury mediated by oxidative
stress that affects some but not others at usual exposure levels. Those who are affected “believe” sun
exposure is responsible. They would be unlikely to discern when they are being exposed versus not to
ultraviolet radiation. (It is their failure to know when significant injury is occurring or has occurred that
leaves them in the sun long enough to receive injury.) What is discerned is the inflammation that follows the
oxidative stress that may emerge only late in exposure or after the sun exposure has been “withdrawn.” A
2927
blinded sham-exposed study would likely also produce inability to discern sham from active treatment.
People do not sense the EMR, but the effects produced by it and studies show that those with ES respond to
different EMR sources. In RF/MW-affected persons, as in diplomats, the effects can arise after hours of
exposure or hours after a short exposure—oxidative stress can cause apoptosis and can then trigger
inflammation (Reutelingsperger & van Heerde, 1997) or can cause blood-brain barrier damage allowing
brain swelling (see above). Progression of these mechanisms may not peak for hours or, in some cases, even
a couple of days. Recovery from effects can take still longer.
For such a study to have a chance to succeed, it would be essential to pretest and individualize both the
control/negative exposure condition and the active/positive exposure condition (including exposure and
time course) in each individual to define a condition that will be effective in that person—if such conditions
can be successfully defined and if cumulative effects do not alter the condition from one trial to the next. For
some people, the background EMR at the facility, or its parking lot or lobby, or the exposure during transit to
the facility may obviate the ability to define a negative exposure condition for that individual. It would be
better to bring the EMR exposure to a place where the affected party is stable and asymptomatic. And the
specific EMR and timing must be individualized to produce a positive condition in a suitable time course.
To be valid, such a study must also protect against the possibility of physiological conditioning effects. These
are distinct from nocebo effects and arise because the true stimulus produces actual physiological harm. It is
known, for instance, that chemotherapy patients may vomit when they enter the room in which they have
received chemotherapy. (Chemotherapy agents like EMR also cause toxicity via oxidative stress (Abraham,
Kolli, & Rabi, 2010; Brea-Calvo, Rodriguez-Hernandez, Fernandez-Ayala, Navas, & Sanchez-Alcazar, 2006;
Husain, Whitworth, Somani, & Rybak, 2001; Shokrzadeh et al., 2014) and mitochondrial injury (Nicolson &
Conklin, 2008). The fact that symptoms also occur with expectation of chemotherapy does not mean that the
chemotherapy itself lacks toxicity (or that perceived adverse effects are due to a nocebo effect); rather,
expectation produces symptoms because the exposure is toxic. Expectation of the noxious exposure may, via
conditioning processes, produce symptoms ordinarily produced by the noxious exposure. (This is
potentially evolutionarily adaptive, serving to encourage persons to avoid settings in which the toxic
exposure is expected.) To ensure against conditioned effects arising with expectation, a set of negative
exposure visits at the test site before (and between) each positive exposure visit may be required to ensure
extinction of physiologically conditioned expectation effects. In essence, the setting that optimizes prospects
to identify a real effect, if present, is that in which the participant believes there will not be an active
exposure.
B. Golomb
N-of-1 studies that focus on physiological effects of EMR have proven somewhat more able to identify EMR
effects in those with ES, or subsets of them for which that physiological marker is affected. Just as symptoms
vary, so physiological changes may do so, so outcomes suited to one person may not apply for all.
Physiological markers changed with blinded EMR exposure in a published study of a female physician with
ES. She could not discern when the exposure was present or not, but measurable changes occurred and
symptoms arose with the positive condition (McCarty et al., 2011). Symptoms were significantly more
intense with pulsed (but not continuous) radiation than sham exposure (McCarty et al., 2011). An N-of-1 test
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
was reportedly conducted in a former Miami organized crime prosecutor who developed ES and chemical
intolerance, with seizures an important part of his clinical profile, following a significant chemical exposure.
An EEG was undertaken, turning on and off a TV, with the party blinded to the stimulus (blindfolded and
with headphones to prevent him hearing when the TV was turned on or off). When the TV was shielded, no
effect on the EEG was seen. With an unshielded television, EEG changes including seizure activity occurred
when the television was turned on, and he experienced physical twitching (Bell, 2017). (This particular
marker is unlikely to be generally useful, as seizure activity is not a usual part of the clinical profile in those
affected by RF/MW.) A provocation study focused in a group of individuals showed changes in heart rate
variability (Havas et al., 2010), an index of autonomic function that is tied to hard outcomes like sudden
death and coronary artery disease (Hayano, 1990; Singer, Martin, Magid, & et al, 1988). Moreover, three of
the four participants who characterized their ES as “intense” (though only persons in this group) exhibited a
striking heart rate increase of between 45 and 90 beats per minute virtually immediately with the microwave
exposure, associated with marked increase in sympathetic response. Declines in parasympathetic response
with RF/MW exposure were seen for 23 of 25 tested people, in all groups, including, though less so, those
with no ES.
In general, assessments of objectively measurable quantities of relevance, including both differences in
affected vs unaffected persons irrespective of current exposure (Belpomme et al., 2015; De Luca et al., 2014),
and changes occurring with exposure (Havas et al., 2010), provide a more promising approach than
real-time assessments of subjective outcomes for understanding this condition.
2929
Financial conflict of interest is One key source of disparities in study results is financial conflicts of interest. When present, financial conflicts
a major source of apparent strongly predict that study results will conform to the financial interests of authors or funders (Barnes &
disparities in results Bero, 1998; Bero, Oostvogel, Bacchetti, & Lee, 2007; Friedman & Richter, 2004; Golomb, 2008; Heres et al.,
2006; Smith, 2005, 2006). An analysis examined why some review articles on passive smoking concluded it
was harmful while others concluded it was not. The only identified factor that predicted which conclusion
was industry conflict by authors—which was often undisclosed (Barnes & Bero, 1998).
Financial conflicts have been a concern specifically in relation to RF/MW, for both studies and regulatory
decisions (Adlkofer & Richter, 2011; Alster, 2015; Hardell, 2017; Huss et al., 2007; Leszczynski, 2015). In an
analysis of studies looking at cell phone effects as a function of funding source, “Studies funded exclusively
by industry reported the largest number of outcomes, but were least likely to report a statistically significant
result” (So, they report everything that wasn’t affected?) “The odds ratio was 0.11 (95% confidence interval,
0.02–0.78), compared with studies funded by public agencies or charities.” Analogous to findings for a
relation of industry funding to failure to find tobacco-related problems (Barnes & Bero, 1998), “the finding
was not materially altered in analyses adjusted for the number of outcomes reported, study quality, and
other factors” (Huss et al., 2007).
It has been generally assumed that the disproportionately product-favorable results from industry-funded
studies (including less evidence of product harm) arise by virtue of choices, selecting study design, exposure
specifics, subjects, and outcomes to support the desired result. (These can in fact influence outcomes. See
below.) But where harms of lucrative products are concerned, there is precedent for industry-funded studies
going beyond those factors to hide even large and lethal harms, even for prespecified or primary
outcomes—via means that have the appearance, at least, of fraud (“Did GSK trial data mask Paxil suicide
risk?” 2008; Harris, 2010). Special circumstances led the apparent shenanigans in those cases to be
uncovered. Whether frank manipulation of data to hide harms of lucrative products is the rule or the
exception in industry-funded studies is simply not known.
Because a robust body of evidence documents a strong relation of industry conflicts to outcomes, deliberations
and standards should be based exclusively on studies in which such conflicts of interest are absent.
(Industry-funded studies can be used for hypothesis generation.) This obviates one major source of apparent
inconsistency in studies, but it eliminates inconsistencies due to this factor only as far as it is possible to
discern when financial conflicts are operating.
B. Golomb
Study outcomes may appear Design features can influence outcomes and may be selected to do so.
different without Details of RF/MW exposure that may influence outcomes include the following (some relevant features have
“inconsistency”: Details doubtless been missed):
matter, to see an effect • Radiation frequency or frequencies (Belyaev, Sheheglow, Alipov, & Ushakov, 2000; Chen, Yang, Tao, & Yang,
2006; Gupta, Mesharam, & Krishnamurthy, 2018),
• Radiation intensity (Adams & Williams, 1976)
• Radiation waveform (Adams & Williams, 1976)
• Polarization (Belyaev et al., 2000; Pall, 2018; Panagopoulos, Johansson, & Carlo, 2015),
• Pulsed versus continuous radiation (Lai, Horita, Chou, & Guy, 1987; Pall, 2018)
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
Radiation that is pulsed (i.e., polarized), is applied intermittently, is more intense, and is applied for a longer
time may be more likely to produce problems, for instance.
Even for studies nominally examining the “same” RF/MW exposure, different choices may be made. A range
of choices are illustrated in this text: “There are 124 different channels/frequencies that are used in GSM900
mobile communication. They differ by 0.2 MHz in the frequency range between 890 and 915 MHz. The test
mobile phone was programmed to use channel 124 with the frequency of 915 MHz. The signal included all
standard GSM modulations. No voice modulation was applied. A GSM signal is produced as 577 μs pulses
(time slots), with an interpulse waiting time of 4039 μs (seven time slots). The test phone was programmed
to regulate output power in the pulses in the range of 0.02–2 W (13–33 dBm). This power was kept constant
during exposure at 33 dBm, as monitored online using a power meter (Bird 43, USA)” (Belyaev et al., 2006).
Studies that examine symptoms as a function of distance from cell towers and base stations suggest that in
important real-world settings, more intense RF/MW exposure is generally a greater problem (Altpeter et al.,
1995; Navarro, Sanchez Del Pino, Gomez, Peralta, & Boveris, 2002; Oberfeld et al., 2004; Santini et al., 2002),
though there may be an intensity range below which this ceases to be the case.
In some conditions, nonmonotonic effects of radiation have been reported (Chiang et al., 1989; Pall, 2018), and
they are arguably expected for agents in the antioxidant-prooxidant spectrum (high-dose antioxidants are
often prooxidant; low-dose prooxidants, via oxidative preconditioning, may be antioxidant).
Opposite-direction effects on a critical mechanism can produce opposite-direction effects in a resulting
outcome. Thus, lower doses of vitamin E fluidize, and higher concentrations stabilize membranes (Packer &
Fuchs, 1993); low vitamin E benefits and higher vitamin E harm vasodilatory function in cholesterol-fed
rabbits (Keaney et al., 1994); “low tocopherol concentrations have stronger antiinflammatory effects in
PUVA-induced erythema than higher concentrations” (Fuchs & Packer, 1993); low doses are tied to lower
mortality in people, higher doses to higher all-cause mortality (Miller et al., 2005). For statins, an agent class
that can produce prooxidant or antioxidant effects, bidirectional effects have been shown on many outcomes
(Golomb et al., 2015). Such bidirectional effects have been shown for many outcomes with RF/MW
(Bergman, 1965). It is common that where a lower amount of something may be favorable (or neutral), a
higher amount may be the adverse, with a transition zone in which subject characteristics and covariables
matter a lot in determining the direction. There are instances in which this directionality is flipped (Au,
Cantelli-Forti, Hrelia, & Legator, 1990); for instance, sometimes a sufficient concentration leads an adaptive
protection to be triggered.
B. Golomb
Beyond characteristics of the radiation, the subject may be exposed to it differently; for example, in animal
studies, there may be whole-body radiation (Bilgici, Akar, Avci, & Tuncel, 2013) or head-only exposure
(Burdelya et al., 2012; de Gannes et al., 2009), triggering a different spectrum of responses. And with in vitro
exposure, even fewer of the variables that might contribute to effects are present. The environment in which
exposure occurs may differ in ways that influence toxicity of radiation—for instance, differences in
temperature may produce different effects (Laszlo et al., 2006), or concurrent or background electromagnetic
exposure (Bua et al., 2018) or chemical exposures (Del Vecchio et al., 2009; Kostoff & Lau, 2017).
Amphetamine use represents one exposure that has been reported to magnify problems with RF/MW
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
(Bolen, 1988).
Characteristics of the “subjects” may differ. In animal and in vitro studies, they may differ in species, strain,
genetic features, cell type cell preparation, and cell density, for instance (Belyaev, Sheheglov, Alipor, &
Ushakov, 2000; Del Vecchio et al., 2009).
As above, “effect modification” refers to the phenomenon by which effects, including adverse effects, are not
equal in all subgroups. This is a major issue in biology, particularly for exposures mediated by oxidative
stress and cell energy impairment. Findings with statin cholesterol-lowering drugs illustrate how massive
the disparity may be as a function of participant group. Like RF/MW, these agents have the potential for
toxicity through prooxidant and mitochondrial adverse mechanisms (Golomb & Evans, 2008; Sinzinger
et al., 2001). RF/MW disproportionately affects sleep and hearing (through its special extra features), but
muscle and tendon problems are sometimes reported (Aschermann, 2009; Lamech, 2014; Schooneveld &
Kuiper, 2007). Fluoroquinolones disproportionately affect tendons through their extra mechanisms. Statins
can do so too, though more rarely (Esenkaya & Unay, 2011; Hoffman, Kraus, Dimbil, & Golomb, 2012; Marie
& Noblet, 2009; “Tendon disorders due to statins,” 2010). Statins disproportionately affect muscle. The most
feared muscle complication is rhabdomyolysis, massive breakdown of muscle that can overwhelm the
kidneys and lead to kidney failure and death, which is also reported with fluoroquinolones though more
rarely (Eisele, Garbe, Zeitz, Schneider, & Somasundaram, 2009; George, Das, Pawar, & Badyal, 2008; Gupta,
Guron, Harris, & Bell, 2012; Hsiao et al., 2005; Khammassi, Abdelhedi, Mohsen, Ben Sassi, & Cherif, 2012;
Korzets, Gafter, Dicker, Herman, & Ori, 2006; Petitjeans et al., 2003; Qian, Nasr, Akogyeram, & Sethi, 2012;
Sanjith, Raodeo, Clerk, Pandit, & Karnad, 2012).
2933
Statins were commonly hailed as so safe they should be put in the water supply (Brown, 2001; Dales, 2000;
Haney, 1999; Roberts, 2004). But analysis of insurance claims data show that (focusing on the one adverse
effect) while the rate of rhabdomyolysis was rare overall, it was common in identifiable vulnerable
subgroups. Hospitalized rhabdomyolysis, per year of treatment, occurred in fewer than 1 in 22,000 on statin
monotherapy. However, the rate was far higher for older persons with diabeties also on a fibrate (a second
class of cholesterol-lowering drug); if they were on the statin agent whose clearance was most affected by
fibrates, rhabdomyolysis occurred in about 1 in 10 per year of treatment (Graham et al., 2004). So depending
on characteristics of the exposure, co-exposures, and the subject, rates of a problem—and ability for science
to show the problem—can vary widely. (The particular statin agent that caused the worst problems was
pulled from the market, but the conceptual point stands.) Risks of harm with exposures are not distributed
equally. A problem that appears very rare overall or in one test group, often apparently not increased relative
to unexposed, can be frankly common in another. If the groups most at risk are not studied or their presence
is seriously diluted, serious harms can be missed. Studies that fail to detect a harm do not invalidate those
that show one—and are not of equal importance where a purpose is to establish that harms can occur.
Rates of problems Though a minority of embassy personnel were reportedly affected (Stone, 2018), the fraction is not small
(Golden & Rotella, 2018). The fraction of U.S. diplomats in Cuba (and now China) reporting effects is higher
than the fraction of civilians citing similar severity problems with RF/MW exposure, though in neither
group can the exposure of those affected be presumed to have been typical. Table 3 suggests that once
persons are symptomatic, the profile of symptoms is similar. The reportedly high prevalence of
Frey-compatible effects and what seem a comparatively large number of diplomats in Cuba affected suggest
exposures of a more intense or more damaging character considering that intensity, frequency, pulse
waveform, pulse duration, duration, polarization, intercurrent exposures, and many other factors influence
injury from RF/MW (Belyaev et al., 2000).
Natural history Both diplomats (Associated Press in Washington, 2017) and RF/MW-affected individuals (Conrad &
Friedman, 2013; Schooneveld & Kuiper, 2007) have shown variable time course to onset of symptoms after
apparent inciting exposure and variable time course and completeness of recovery with time away from the
exposure. Doctors submitting the Bamberg Appeal to the Prime Minister of Germany noted, “The
symptoms occur in temporal and spatial relationship to exposure. . . . Some of the health disturbance
disappears immediately the exposure ceases (removal of DECT telephone, temporary moving away from
home, permanently moving away, using shielding)” (Waldman-Selsam, 2004). An intervention study from
B. Golomb
Japan, involving the “intervention” of removing a cellular phone base station on a condominium, affirms
improvement with removal of the exposure. One hundred seven of 122 inhabitants were interviewed and
had medical examinations at two time points while the base station was in operation and three months after
it was removed. “The health of these inhabitants was shown to improve after the removal of the antennas,
and the researchers could identify no other factors that could explain this health improvement. . . . The
results of these examinations and interviews indicate a connection between adverse health effects and
electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations” (Shinjyo & Shinjyo, 2014). Studies in Russia of
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
occupationally affected persons report that even with treatments that target mechanism of RF/MW injury,
for those at least moderately affected, placing them back in the setting of exposure leads to a progressive
course (Sadchikova & Glotova, 1973).
Natural history could differ for diplomats who may have been exposed to a more intense stimulus or one with
more injurious characteristics—suggested by what appear to be a comparatively high number affected and a
high prevalence of Frey effects. With a powerful exposure, depressed defenses are not equally required to
produce injury. There is not a basis to know if affected diplomats will have heightened vulnerability to
“usual” RF/MW exposures going forward, though this bears assessing.
a An illustration from a common drug, and a common food: “Grapefruit juice increased the mean peak serum concentration (Cmax) of unchanged
simvastatin about 9-fold (range, 5.1-fold to 31.4-fold; P < .01) and the mean area under the serum simvastatin concentration-time curve [AUC
(0-infinity)] 16-fold (range, 9.0-fold to 37.7-fold; P < .05)” (Lilja, Kivisto, & Neuvonen, 1998). Thus, just one comparatively innocuous interacting
factor, grapefruit juice (which inhibits an enzyme involved in simvastatin metabolism), led some to have a 38-fold greater blood “amount” of a
drug, than that same person would have had without the juice. Potential differences are magnified comparing different persons with or without
juice, and more so factoring in impact of other exposures. Other risk-multiplying factors are tied to the individual. The same serum level can
produce a radically different impact from person to person; relevant factors include genetic differences in muscle and factors that reduce energy
supply or increase energy demand to muscle (Golomb, 2014; Golomb & Evans, 2008; Golomb & Koperski, 2013; Oh, Ban, Miskie, Pollex, & Hegele,
2007; Sinzinger & O’Grady, 2004; Vladutiu et al., 2006). Thus, what is the “same” exposure before it hits two people can become a radically different
exposure once it interacts with individuals’ biology.
2935
4 Discussion
What kinds of RF/MW In the UCSD survey, smart meters were the dominant inciting trigger (about 50% of those 70% or so who recognized
sources affect a triggering episode), with cell phones, Wi-Fi introduction or new routers, medical radiation, and other factors also
civilians? reported (Golomb, 2015a). The range of apparent triggers has been vast, with RF/MW, and particularly pulsed
RF/MW, commonly implicated. Considering those who have communicated with us, a couple from Scotland
became affected several decades ago, after they moved to a rural area but across from a radar factory. Though they
moved away, both remain “electrosensitive” decades later. Others became affected when a cell tower was placed
next to their home. Gro Harlem Brundtland reports becoming sensitized following exposure to a malfunctioning
microwave oven in an episode that also reportedly blinded her for a year (Woolston, 2010; www.es-uk, 2012). An
Australian veteran reports that he became affected during his military service, working with radiofrequency
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
radiation (radar workers in the military were among the first groups in whom such problems were recognized
many decades ago). One who communicated with us became sensitized in association with a job placing radio
collars on wildlife. An architect who contacted us was sensitized after several months working closely with
Bluetooth-enabled lighting devices. Parents reported to us the onset of ES in their children with Wi-Fi introduced
to the school; accommodations were denied, forcing parents to remove their children from school and move
elsewhere and forcing some teachers from their job (“Math teacher asks school to protect children from Wi-Fi,”
2015; “Math teacher raises concerns about WIFI comparing the effects to a concussion,” 2014). In Sweden and the
United Kingdom, a controversial radio system, TETRA, reportedly caused health problems in some police officers,
severe insomnia in a Swedish officer resolved when the officer’s managers noted the connection and placed the
officer in a room without the exposure (www.es-uk, 2012). Some U.S. firefighters were affected after municipalities
placed cell towers on roofs of fire stations (International Association of Fire Fighters Division of Occupational
Health Safety and Medicine, 2006): “Symptoms experienced by the firefighters have included neurological
impairment including severe headache, confusion, inability to focus, lethargy, inability to sleep, and inability to
wake up for 911 emergency calls. Firefighters have reported getting lost on 911 calls in the same community they
grew up in, and one veteran medic forgot where he was in the midst of basic CPR on a cardiac victim and couldn’t
recall how to start the procedure over again. Prior to the installation of the tower on his station, this medic had
reportedly not made a single mistake in 20 years” (Foster, 2017). The International Association of Fire Fighters
Division of Occupational Health, Safety and Medicine crafted a position paper (International Association of Fire
Fighters Division of Occupational Health Safety and Medicine, 2006), and firefighters were exempted in the recent
proposed California bill, SB-649 (Foster, 2017; “State of California Senate Bill 649 (SB-649): Wireless
2937
Telecommunications Bill,” 2017), that sought to bypass local control in placing of 5G cell towers (Foster, 2017).
These were not nocebo effects; many developed symptoms prior to identifying the source of the problem or, in some
cases, even being aware that the exposure existed at that time. Many had no idea the exposure had the potential to
produce problems. They were blindsided by the onset of new problems. The causes were identified by their
spatial and temporal relationship to onset, worsening, and abatement.
Reports of problems from commercial sources of RF/MW have emerged from many nations including Russia
(Sadchikova & Glotova, 1973), Korea (Cho et al., 2016), Japan (Kato & Johansson, 2012), Taiwan (Tseng, Lin, &
Cheng, 2011), Turkey (Durusoy et al., 2017), Israel (Tachover, 2013), Australia (Lamech, 2014), New Zealand
(www.esnztrust), France (Belpomme et al., 2015), England (Bergqvist et al., 1997; Eltiti et al., 2007), Ireland
(Bergqvist et al., 1997; IDEA, www.iervn.com), Spain (Bigorra, 2016; Navarro et al., 2003; Oberfeld et al., 2004),
Italy (Bergqvist et al., 1997; De Luca et al., 2014), the Netherlands (Schooneveld & Kuiper, 2007), Switzerland
(Altpeter et al., 1995; Schreier et al., 2006), Austria (Bergqvist et al., 1997; Hutter, Moshammer, Wallner, & Kundi,
2006; Leitgeb, 1998; Schröttner & Leitgeb, 2008), Germany (Bergqvist et al., 1997; Hensinger & Wilke, 2016),
Denmark (Bergqvist et al., 1997; EHS Foreningen, 2018), Sweden (Gruber et al., 2018; Johansson, 2015) where
Ericsson designer Per Segerbäck was seriously affected (Nordström, 2004), Norway (www.felo.no) afflicting
three-time Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland; Finland (Hagstrom et al., 2013) reportedly affecting former
Nokia chief technology officer Matti Niemela (Nikka, 2014), the United States (Carpenter, 2014; Heuser & Heuser,
2017; Levallois et al., 2002; Woolston, 2010), where affected former Silicon Valley techies Peter Sullivan
(Harkinson, 2017) and Jeromy Johnson (Johnson, n.d.) strive to bring attention to the problem; and
Canada, where Frank Clegg, formerly President of Microsoft Canada, Inc, now CEO of Canadians for Safe
Technology—spearheads the effort toward recognition (Clegg, 2013).
Past RF/MW use and Exposure of diplomats to RF/MW is not a new phenomenon. The U.S. embassy in Moscow was reportedly radiated
diplomats with microwaves from 1953 to 1988 (other sources give earlier or later end dates), spawning U.S. efforts to shield
the embassy (Gwertzman, 1976; Schumaker, 2013). The Soviets claimed the purpose was to jam U.S. listening
devices (Gwertzman, 1976).
Based on reports of past embassy staff, a number of personnel and their offspring developed health effects, some
developed white blood cell count elevations, and a couple developed hematological malignancies (Schumaker,
2013). Elevated white blood cell counts (Aschermann, 2009), as well as depressed ones (Adams & Williams, 1976),
have elsewhere been reported in association with RF/MW, as have hematological malignancies (Dolk et al., 1997;
Hocking & Gordon, 2003), including a recent report of an occupational relationship of RF/MW to
“hemolymphatic” malignancies in the military setting: “The PF [percentage frequency] of HL [hemolymphatic]
B. Golomb
cancers in the case series was very high, at 40% with only 23% expected for the series age and gender profile,
confidence interval CI95%: 26–56%, p < 0.01, 19 out of 47 patients had HL cancers. We also found high PF for
multiple primaries. As for the three other cohort studies, in the Polish military sector, the PF of HL cancers was
36% in the exposed population as compared to 12% in the unexposed population, p < 0.001. In a small group of
employees exposed to RF/MW in Israeli defense industry, the PF of HL cancers was 60% versus 17% expected for
the group age and gender profile, p < 0.05. In Belgian radar battalions the HL PF was 8.3% versus 1.4% in the
control battalions as shown in a causes of deaths study and HL cancer mortality rate ratio was 7.2 and statistically
significant. Similar findings were reported on radio amateurs and Korean war technicians. Elevated risk ratios
were previously reported in most of the above studies” (Peleg, Nativ, & Richter, 2018). There was also a news
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness
report of a “blood disorder” in a Cuban diplomat, but its character was unspecified (Robles & Semple, 2017a).
A controversial Johns Hopkins study was commissioned to assess the health of Moscow embassy personnel but was
never published in peer-reviewed literature. Staff from other Eastern European embassies were used as controls
(Elwood, 2012), a problematic control group as these are the embassies most likely to have been subjected to
similar exposures. Indeed a Freedom of Information Act request reportedly yielded claims of exposure from
employees at other embassies (Elwood, 2012). A reanalysis asserted that Russian and Eastern European
diplomats, if combined, exhibited a significant increase, relative to expectation from the general US population, in
three cancer types (Elwood, 2012; Goldsmith, 1995) that have each been associated with RF/MW exposure in
other studies: hematological malignancy (Peleg et al., 2018), brain cancer (Hardell & Carlberg, 2013, 2015; Hardell,
Carlberg, & Hansson Mild, 2011; Hardell, Carlberg, Soderqvist, & Mild, 2013), and breast cancer (Balekouzou
et al., 2017; West et al., 2013). Some complaints, such as vision problems, concentration problems, memory loss,
depression, and “other symptoms” were greater in the Moscow than the comparator group, in either men or
women or, for vision and concentration problems, in each men and women. A reanalysis concluded that the
Lilienfeld evidence in the context of other literature “support the RF sickness syndrome as a medical entity”
(Johnson Liakouris, 1998).
Current RF/MW source The source of proposed EMR/RF/MW (probably pulsed) affecting diplomats is not a principal focus of this article.
possibilities in For the diplomats in Cuba, causative RF/MW could in principle emanate from monitoring and surveillance devices,
diplomats as has been speculated for microwaving of the U.S. embassy in Moscow (Gwertzman, 1976); from efforts to jam
our listening devices, as claimed by the Soviets (Gwertzman, 1976); or from electronic weaponry, or conceivably
from innocent communications sources of the type that affect some civilians (but presumably of higher typical
pulse intensity, or shorter pulse duration, or in the setting of other exposures that amplify oxidative stress, or with
2939
Table 5: Continued.
Weaponry or surveillance would seem perhaps the most likely, given the apparent preferential involvement of CIA
operatives under diplomatic cover (Golden & Rotella, 2018).
Room sweep by FBI The source of the historical microwave exposure on the U.S. embassy in Moscow was also outside the embassy
yielded no devices. building. It reportedly originated from the building next door and later from the building across the street
(Lederman, (Gwertzman, 1976).
Weissenstein, & Lee, Smart meters (or banks of them), outside the room, were the number one reported instigating cause of symptoms in
2017) the UCSD survey, with other causes, including base stations or cell towers outside the home. Pulsed
RF/MW-producing devices, including so-called “Through the wall” (TTW) surveillance technology, need not be
in the room. The exposure can be short term or intermittent; it need not be continuous. For this reason, devices in
whatever their location need not remain present after health effects have been produced.
B. Golomb
4.2 Fit with Literature. Evidence for health effects of RF/MW is not
new (Adams & Williams, 1976; Bergman, 1965; Bolen, 1988; Raines, 1981).
A 1971–1972 naval report bearing over 2300 citations, many from Russia and
eastern Europe, already documented health effects of microwave/RF/MW,
emphasizing “non-ionizing radiation at these frequencies” (Glaser, 1972).
Acknowledgments
For kindly helping to retrieve sources for this article, I thank Emily Nguyen,
Hayley Koslik, Leeann Bui, Andrea Sember, Annabelle Amos, Karl Chen,
Arthur Pavlovsky, Rebecca Hunter, and Aubrey Bunday.
Diplomats’ Mystery Illness 2943
References
Abdel-Rassoul, G., Abou El-Fateh, O., Abou Salem, M., Michael, A., Farahat, F., El-
Batanouny, M., & Salem, E. (2007). Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants
around mobile phone base stations. NeuroToxicology, 28, 434–440.
Abdel-Wahab, M. H., Arafa, H. M., El-Mahdy, M. A., & Abdel-Naim, A. B. (2002).
Potential protective effect of melatonin against dibromoacetonitrile-induced ox-
idative stress in mouse stomach. Pharmacol Res., 46(3), 287–293.
Abdel Moneim, A. E., Ortiz, F., Leonardo-Mendonca, R. C., Vergano-Villodres, R.,
Alsanosi, A. A., Al-Momani, M. O., Hagr, A. A., Almomani, F. M., Shami, I. M., &
Al-Habeeb, S. F. (2013). The acute auditory effects of exposure for 60 minutes to
mobile‘s electromagnetic field. Saudi Med. J., 34(2), 142–146.
Alster, N. (2015). Captured agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is
dominated by the industries it presumably regulates. Harvard University, Edmond J.
Safra Center for Ethics. www.harvard.ethics.edu (https://creativecommons.org
/licenses/by/4.0/)
Altpeter, E. S., Krebs, T., Pfluger, D. H., von Kanel, J., Blattman, R., et al. (1995). Study
on health effects of the shortwave transmitter station of Schwarzenburg, Berne, Switzer-
Associated Press. (2017b). Tillerson says diplomats in Havana suffered “health at-
tacks.” Los Angeles Times, August 12.
Associated Press. (2017c). Bizarre Cuba mystery: Did sonic weapon cause U.S. diplo-
mats brain injury? Mercury News, September 14.
Associated Press. (2017d). US Cuban diplomats to discuss health incidents, Septem-
ber 18.
Associated Press in Washington. (2017). Mystery of sonic weapon attacks at US em-
bassy in Cuba deepens. Guardian, September 14.
Au, W. W., Cantelli-Forti, G., Hrelia, P., & Legator, M. S. (1990). Cytogenetic assays
Bardak, Y., Ozerturk, Y., Ozguner, F., Durmus, M., & Delibas, N. (2000). Effect of
melatonin against oxidative stress in ultraviolet-B exposed rat lens. Curr. Eye Res.,
20(3), 225–230.
Barichello, T., Lemos, J. C., Generoso, J. S., Cipriano, A. L., Milioli, G. L., Marcelino, D.
M., Vuolo, F., et al. (2011). Oxidative stress, cytokine/chemokine and disruption
of blood-brain barrier in neonate rats after meningitis by Streptococcus agalactiae.
Neurochem Res., 36, 1922–1930.
Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive
smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA, 279(19), 1566–1570.
Bergqvist, U., Vogel, E., Aringer, L., Cunningham, J., Gobba, F., Leitgeb, N., Miro,
L., et al. (Eds.). (1997). Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and elec-
tromagnetic fields: A report prepared by a European group of experts for the European
Commission, DG V. Solna, Sweden: European Commission Directorate General V.
Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, National Institute for Work-
ing Life, Sweden.
Bero, L., Oostvogel, F., Bacchetti, P., & Lee, K. (2007). Factors associated with findings
of published trials of drug-drug Comparisons: Why some statins appear more
efficacious than others. PLoS Med., 4(6), e184.
Chiang, H., Yao, G. D., Fang, Q. S., Wang, K. Q., Lu, D. Z., & Zhou, Y. K. (1989). Health
effects of environmental electromagnetic fields. J. Bioelectricity, 8(1), 127–131.
Chignell, C. F., Kukielczak, B. M., Sik, R. H., Bilski, P. J., & He, Y. Y. (2006). Ultraviolet
A sensitivity in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: Possible involvement of cholesta-
5,7,9(11)-trien-3 beta-ol. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 41(2), 339–346.
Cho, S., Breedlove, J. J., & Gunning, S. T. (2008). Radiation recall reaction induced by
levofloxacin. J. Drugs Dermatol., 7(1), 64–67.
Cho, Y. M., Lim, H. J., Jang, H., Kim, K., Choi, J. W., Shin, C., Lee, S. K., et al. (2016).
A follow-up study of the association between mobile phone use and symptoms
Das, A., Belagodu, A., Reiter, R. J., Ray, S. K., & Banik, N. L. (2008). Cytoprotective
effects of melatonin on C6 astroglial cells exposed to glutamate excitotoxicity and
oxidative stress. J. Pineal Res., 45(2), 117–124.
Dawson, G. A., Brown, S. I., & Tellefsen, L. (2009). A drug-related phototoxic reac-
tion and its possible relationship to a radiation-induced skin reaction. Oncologist,
14(3), 303–306.
de Gannes, F. P., Billaudel, B., Taxile, M., Haro, E., Ruffie, G., Leveque, P., Veyret,
B., et al. (2009). Effects of head-only exposure of rats to GSM-900 on blood-brain
barrier permeability and neuronal degeneration. Radiat. Res., 172(3), 359–367.
Epperly, M. W., Kagan, V. E., Sikora, C. A., Gretton, J. E., Defilippi, S. J., Bar-
Sagi, D., & Greenberger, S., et al. (2001). Manganese superoxide dismutase-
plasmid/liposome (MnSOD-PL) administration protects mice from esophagitis
associated with fractionated radiation. Int. J. Cancer, 96(4), 221–231.
Esenkaya, I., & Unay, K. (2011). Tendon, tendon healing, hyperlipidemia and statins.
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J., 1(4), 169–171.
Esmekaya, M. A., Ozer, C., & Seyhan, N. (2011). 900 MHz pulse-modulated radiofre-
quency radiation induces oxidative stress on heart, lung, testis and liver tissues.
Gen. Physiol. Biophys, 30(1), 84–89.
Fetoni, A. R., De Bartolo, P., Eramo, S. L. M., Rolesi, R., Paciello, F., Bergamini, C.,
Fato, R., et al. (2013). Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as a target of oxidative
stress-mediated damage: Cochlear and cortical responses after an increase in an-
tioxidant defense. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(9), 4011–4023.
Filomeni, G., Cardaci, S., Da Costa Ferreira, A. M., Rotilio, G., & Ciriolo, M. R. (2011).
Metabolic oxidative stress elicited by the copper(II) complex [Cu(isaepy)2] trig-
gers apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells through the induction of the AMP-activated
protein kinase/p38MAPK/p53 signalling axis: Evidence for a combined use
with 3-bromopyruvate in neuroblastoma treatment. Biochem. J., 437(3), 443–
George, P., Das, J., Pawar, B., & Badyal, D. (2008). Gatifloxacin-induced rhabdomy-
olysis. J. Postgrad. Med., 54(3), 233–234.
Gerster, H. (1999). High-dose vitamin C: A risk for persons with high iron stores?
Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res., 69(2), 67–82.
Gilgun-Sherki, Y., Melamed, E., & Offen, D. (2004). The role of oxidative stress in the
pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: The need for effective antioxidant therapy. J.
Neurol., 251(3), 261–268.
Glaser, Z. R. (1972). Bibliography of reported biological phenomena (“effects”) and clini-
cal manifestations attributed to microwave and radiofrequency radiation (Research Re-
Goswami, S., & Haldar, C. (2014a). Melatonin improves ultraviolet B-induced oxida-
tive damage and inflammatory conditions in cutaneous tissue of a diurnal Indian
palm squirrel Funambulus pennanti. Br. J. Dermatol., 171(5), 1147–1155.
Goswami, S., & Haldar, C. (2014b). UVB irradiation severely induces systemic tissue
injury by augmenting oxidative load in a tropical rodent: efficacy of melatonin as
an antioxidant. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 141, 84–92.
Goswami, S., Sharma, S., & Haldar, C. (2013). The oxidative damages caused by ul-
traviolet radiation type C (UVC) to a tropical rodent Funambulus pennanti: Role
of melatonin. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 125, 19–25.
Gwertzman, B. (1976). Moscow rays linked to U.S. bugging. New York Times, Febru-
ary 26.
Hagstrom, M., Auranen, J., & Ekman, R. (2013). Electromagnetic hypersensitive
Finns: Symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study.
Pathophysiology, 20(2), 117–122.
Halgamuge, M. N. (2013). Critical time delay of the pineal melatonin rhythm in hu-
mans due to weak electromagnetic exposure. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 50(4),
259–265.
Halliday, G. M. (2005). Inflammation, gene mutation and photoimmunosuppression
Harkinson, J. (2017). This former techie owes his fortune to electronic devices. Now
he thinks they’re dangerous. Mother Jones, January 28.
Harris, G. (2010). Caustic government report deals blow to diabetes drug. New York
Times, July 9.
Harris, G. (2017a). 16 Americans sickened after attack on embassy staff in Havana.
New York Times, August 24.
Harris, G. (2017b). Tillerson says U.S. may close Cuba embassy over mystery ail-
ments. New York Times, September 17.
Harris, G. (2018a). Pompeo says mysterious sickness among diplomats in Cuba has
Hiramoto, K., Ohkawa, T., Oikawa, N., & Kikugawa, K. (2003). Is nitric oxide (NO)
an antioxidant or a prooxidant for lipid peroxidation? Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo),
51(9), 1046–1050.
Hocking, B., & Gordon, I. (2003). Decreased survival for childhood leukemia in prox-
imity to television towers. Arch. Environ. Health, 58(9), 560–564.
Hodgkiss, R. J., Stratford, M. R., & Watfa, R. R. (1989). The effect of alpha-tocopherol
and alpha-tocopheryl quinone on the radiosensitivity of thiol-depleted mam-
malian cells. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 16(5), 1297–1300.
Hoffman, K. B., Kraus, C., Dimbil, M., & Golomb, B. A. (2012). A survey of the FDA’s
Iborra, A., Palacio, J. R., & Martinez, P. (2005). Oxidative stress and autoimmune
response in the infertile woman. Chem. Immunol. Allergy, 88, 150–162.
IDEA (Irish Doctors’ Environmental Association). (2004). IDEA position on electromag-
netic radiation. http://www.ideaireland.org/emr.htm
Ikeda-Douglas, C. J., Zicker, S. C., Estrada, J., Jewell, D. E., & Milgram, N. W. (2004).
Prior experience, antioxidants, and mitochondrial cofactors improve cognitive
function in aged beagles. Vet. Ther., 5(1), 5–16.
Ikeda, T., Choi, B. H., Yee, S., Murata, Y., & Quilligan, E. J. (1999). Oxidative stress,
brain white matter damage and intrauterine asphyxia in fetal lambs. Int. J. Dev.
Jagetia, G. C., & Baliga, M. S. (2003). Treatment of mice with a herbal preparation
(Mentat) protects against radiation-induced mortality. Phytother. Res., 17(8), 876–
881.
Jagetia, G. C., Venkatesh, P., & Baliga, M. S. (2004). Fruit extract of Aegle marmelos
protects mice against radiation-induced lethality. Integr. Cancer Ther., 3(4), 323–
332.
Jain, S., Agarwal, J., Laskar, S., Gupta, T., & Shrivastava, S. (2008). Radiation recall
dermatitis with gatifloxacin: A review of literature. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol.,
52(2), 191–193.
Karbownik, M., & Reiter, R. J. (2002). Melatonin protects against oxidative stress
caused by delta-aminolevulinic acid: Implications for cancer reduction. Cancer
Invest., 20(2), 276–286.
Karslioglu, I., Ertekin, M. V., Taysi, S., Kocer, I., Sezen, O., Gepdiremen, A., Koe, M.,
et al. (2005). Radioprotective effects of melatonin on radiation-induced cataract.
J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo), 46(2), 277–282.
Kato, Y., & Johansson, O. (2012). Reported functional impairments of electrohyper-
sensitive Japanese: A questionnaire survey. Pathophysiology, 19(2), 95–100.
Katsu, M., Niizuma, K., Yoshioka, H., Okami, N., Sakata, H., & Chan, P. H. (2010).
Koillinen, H., Jaaskelainen, S., & Koski, K. (2009). [Mitochondrial disorder underly-
ing headache symptoms]. Duodecim., 125(3), 297–300.
Kontush, A., Finckh, B., Karten, B., Kohlschutter, A., & Beisiegel, U. (1996). Antioxi-
dant and prooxidant activity of alpha-tocopherol in human plasma and low den-
sity lipoprotein. J. Lipid Res., 37(7), 1436–1448.
Korkmaz, G. G., Uzun, H., Cakatay, U., & Aydin, S. (2012). Melatonin ameliorates
oxidative damage in hyperglycemia-induced liver injury. Clin. Invest. Med., 35(6),
E370–E377.
Korzets, A., Gafter, U., Dicker, D., Herman, M., & Ori, Y. (2006). Levofloxacin and
Laothong, U., Pinlaor, P., Hiraku, Y., Boonsiri, P., Prakobwong, S., Khoontawad, J., &
Pinlaoro, et al. (2010). Protective effect of melatonin against Opisthorchis viverrini-
induced oxidative and nitrosative DNA damage and liver injury in hamsters. J.
Pineal Res., 49(3), 271–282.
Laszlo, A., Davidson, T., Harvey, A., Sim, J. E., Malyapa, R. S., Spitz, D. R., & Roti
Roti, J. L. (2006). Alterations in heat-induced radiosensitization accompanied by
nuclear structure alterations in Chinese hamster cells. Int. J. Hyperthermia, 22(1),
43–60.
Lederman, J. (2017a). 19 American diplomats in Cuba suffering health problems after
Li, W. H., Li, Y. Z., Song, D. D., Wang, X. R., Liu, M., Wu, X. D., et al. (2014). Calreti-
culin protects rat microvascular endothelial cells against microwave radiation-
induced injury by atenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress. Microcirculation,
21(6), 506–515.
Li, W., Lidebjer, C., Yuan, X. M., Szymanowski, A., Backteman, K., Ernerudh, J., Le-
anderson, P., et al. (2008). NK cell apoptosis in coronary artery disease: Relation
to oxidative stress. Atherosclerosis, 199(1), 65–72.
Liang, F. Q., & Godley, B. F. (2003). Oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial DNA
damage in human retinal pigment epithelial cells: A possible mechanism for RPE
Mancuso, M., Coppede, F., Migliore, L., Siciliano, G., & Murri, L. (2006). Mitochon-
drial dysfunction, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. J. Alzheimers, Dis.,
10(1), 59–73.
Manda, K., Anzai, K., Kumari, S., & Bhatia, A. L. (2007). Melatonin attenuates
radiation-induced learning deficit and brain oxidative stress in mice. Acta Neuro-
biol. Exp. (Wars), 67(1), 63–70.
Manda, K., & Reiter, R. J. (2010). Melatonin maintains adult hippocampal neuroge-
nesis and cognitive functions after irradiation. Prog. Neurobiol., 90(1), 60–68.
Manda, K., Ueno, M., & Anzai, K. (2007). AFMK, a melatonin metabolite, attenuates
Montilla, P. L., Vargas, J. F., Tunez, I. F., Munoz de Agueda, M. C., Valdelvira, M. E., &
Cabrera, E. S. (1998). Oxidative stress in diabetic rats induced by streptozotocin:
Protective effects of melatonin. J. Pineal Res., 25(2), 94–100.
Mor, M., Spadoni, G., Diamantini, G., Bedini, A., Tarzia, G., Silva, C., Vacondio, F.,
et al. (2003). Antioxidant and cytoprotective activity of indole derivatives related
to melatonin. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 527, 567–575.
Morimoto, K., Kawada, A., Hiruma, M., Ishibashi, A., & Banba, H. (1995). Photosen-
sitivity to simvastatin with an unusual response to photopatch and photo tests.
Contact Dermatitis, 33(4), 274.
Ortega-Gutierrez, S., Garcia, J. J., Martinez-Ballarin, E., Reiter, R. J., Millan-Plano, S.,
Robinson, M., & Acuna-Castroviejo, D. (2002). Melatonin improves deferoxamine
antioxidant activity in protecting against lipid peroxidation caused by hydrogen
peroxide in rat brain homogenates. Neurosci. Lett., 323(1), 55–59.
Ortiz, F., Acuna-Castroviejo, D., Doerrier, C., Dayoub, J. C., Lopez, L. C., Venegas, C.,
Garcia, J. A., et al. (2015). Melatonin blunts the mitochondrial/NLRP3 connection
and protects against radiation-induced oral mucositis. J. Pineal Res., 58(1), 34–
49.
Othman, A. I., Edrees, G. M., El-Missiry, M. A., Ali, D. A., Aboel-Nour, M., & Dab-
Packer, L., & Fuchs, J. (Eds.). (1993). Vitamin E in health and disease. New York: Dekker.
Page, S. R., & Yee, K. C. (2014). Rhabdomyolysis in association with simvastatin and
dosage increment in clarithromycin. Intern. Med. J., 44(7), 690–693.
Pal, S., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2006). Possible beneficial effects of melatonin supple-
mentation on arsenic-induced oxidative stress in Wistar rats. Drug Chem. Toxicol.,
29(4), 423–433.
Pall, M. L. (2015). Scientific evidence contradicts findings and assumptions of Cana-
dian Safety Panel 6: Microwaves act through voltage-gated calcium channel acti-
vation to induce biological impacts at non-thermal levels, supporting a paradigm
Popov, S. S., Shulgin, K. K., Popova, T. N., Pashkov, A. N., Agarkov, A. A., & de
Carvalho, M. A. (2015). Effects of melatonin-aided therapy on the glutathione
antioxidant system activity and liver protection. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol., 29, 449–
457.
Porto Arceo, J. A. (2003). [Special features of NSAID intolerance in children]. Allergol.
Immunopathol. (Madr.), 31(3), 109–125.
Powell, R. M. (2015). Symptoms after exposure to smart meter radiation. PMID,
25478801, https://www.scribd.com/doc/289777267/Symptoms-after-Exposure
-to-Smart-Meter-Radiation
Sadchikova, M. N., & Glotova, K. V. (1973). The clinic, pathogenesis, treatment, and
outcome of radiowave sickness. (Translated from Russian.) In Z. V. Gordon (Ed.)
1974, Biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (pp. 54–62). Arlington,
VA: Joint Publications Research Service.
Sadir, S., Deveci, S., Korkmaz, A., & Oter, S. (2007). Alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene
and melatonin administration protects cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative
damage to bladder tissue in rats. Cell Biochem. Funct., 25(5), 521–526.
Sahna, E., Parlakpinar, H., Turkoz, Y., & Acet, A. (2005). Protective effects of mela-
tonin on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion induced infarct size and oxidative
Sharma, A. K., Mehta, A. K., Rathor, N., Chalawadi Hanumantappa, M. K., Khanna,
N., & Bhattacharya, S. K. (2013). Melatonin attenuates cognitive dysfunction and
reduces neural oxidative stress induced by phosphamidon. Fundam. Clin. Phar-
macol., 27(2), 146–151.
Sharma, S., & Haldar, C. (2006). Melatonin prevents X-ray irradiation induced ox-
idative damagein peripheral blood and spleen of the seasonally breeding rodent,
Funambulus pennanti, during reproductively active phase. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 82(6),
411–419.
Shea, C. R., Wimberly, J., & Hasan, T. (1986). Mitochondrial phototoxicity sensitized
Singh, S., Mani, K. V., & Kapoor, N. (2015). Effect of occupational EMF exposure from
radar at two different frequency bands on plasma melatonin and serotonin levels.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 91, 426–434.
Sinzinger, H., Lupattelli, G., & Chehne, F. (2000). Increased lipid peroxidation in a
patient with CK-elevation and muscle pain during statin therapy. Atherosclerosis,
153(1), 255–256.
Sinzinger, H., Lupattelli, G., Chehne, F., Oguogho, A., & Furberg, C. D. (2001). Iso-
prostane 8-epi-PGF2alpha is frequently increased in patients with muscle pain
and/or CK-elevation after HMG-Co-enzyme-A-reductase inhibitor therapy. J.
Tachover, D. (2013). The Israeli Supreme Court ordered the Israeli government to in-
vestigate the number of children currently suffering from EHS. EMFacts, July 23.
https://www.emfacts.com/2013/2007/the-israeli-supreme-court-ordered-the
-israeli-government-to-investigate-the-number-of-children-currently-suffering
-fr
Takemori, K., Murakami, T., Kometani, T., & Ito, H. (2013). Possible involvement of
oxidative stress as a causative factor in blood-brain barrier dysfunction in stroke-
prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Microvasc. Res., 90, 169–172.
Tan, D. X., Manchester, L. C., Qin, L., & Reiter, R. J. (2016). Melatonin: A mitochon-
Totan, Y., Cekic, O., Borazan, M., Uz, E., Sogut, S., & Akyol, O. (2001). Plasma mal-
ondialdehyde and nitric oxide levels in age related macular degeneration. Br. J.
Ophthalmol., 85(12), 1426–1428.
Tressider, A. (2017). Electrosensitivity—an environmental illness, an authentic di-
agnosis, not a delusional disorder: To my Medical Colleagues, GPs, Psychiatrists,
Neurologists and Others [letter]. http://www.es-uk.info/wp-content/uploads
/2018/05/ES%20letter%20psych%20paper%20Jan2%20217.pdf
Trisciuoglio, D., Krasnowska, E., Maggi, A., Pozzi, R., Parasassi, T., & Sapora, O.
(2002). Phototoxic effect of fluoroquinolones on two human cell lines. Toxicol. In
Vos, O., van der Schans, G. P., & Roos-Verheij, W. S. (1986). Reduction of intracellular
glutathione content and radiosensitivity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem.
Med., 50(1), 155–165.
Vurucu, S., Karaoglu, A., Paksu, M. S., Yesilyurt, O., Oz, O., Unay, B., & Akin, R.,
et al. (2013). Relationship between oxidative stress and chronic daily headache in
children. Human and Experimental Toxicology, 32(2), 113–119.
Wagai, N., & Tawara, K. (1991). Important role of oxygen metabolites in quinolone
antibacterial agent-induced cutaneous phototoxicity in mice. Arch. Toxicol., 65(6),
495–499.
Yakymenko, I., Tsybulin, O., Sidorik, E., Henshel, D., Kyrylenko, O., & Kyrylenko,
S. (2015). Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofre-
quency radiation. Electromagn. Biol. Med., 35(2), 186–202.
Yalcinkaya, S., Unlucerci, Y., Giris, M., Olgac, V., Dogru-Abbasoglu, S., & Uysal, M.
(2009). Oxidative and nitrosative stress and apoptosis in the liver of rats fed on
high methionine diet: Protective effect of taurine. Nutrition, 25(4), 436–444.
Yamasoba, T., Someya, S., Yamada, C., Weindruch, R., Prolla, T. A., & Tanokura, M.
(2007). Role of mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial DNA mutations in
age-related hearing loss. Hear. Res., 226(1–2), 185–193.
Zhu, W., Zhang, W., Wang, H., Xu, J., Li, Y., & Lv, S. (2014). Apoptosis induced by
microwave radiation in pancreatic cancer JF305 cells. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.,
92(4), 324–329.
Zimmer, C. (2017a). The “sonic attack” that likely wasn’t. New York Times, October 6.
Zimmer, C. (2017b). What’s a science reporter to do when sound evidence isn’t
sound? New York Times, October 6.
Zoric, L., Kosanovic-Jakovic, N., Colak, E., Radosavljevic, A., Jaksic, V., & Stevic, S.
(2008). [Oxidative stress in association with risk factors for the occurrence and
development of age-related macular degeneration]. Vojnosanit. Pregl., 65(4), 313–