Rao Et Al 2001 A Study of HRD Concepts Structure of HRD Departments and HRD Practices in India
Rao Et Al 2001 A Study of HRD Concepts Structure of HRD Departments and HRD Practices in India
H R S P r i n c i p l e E n v i s a g e d b y P a reek and Rao (1977) Assessment of the Extent to which the Principle in Being
Followed
• HRD should help the company to increase • This is aimed at by all the organizations.
enabling capabilities. The capabilities However, there is no well-articulated
outlined in their report include: development philosophy. The concern exists in the minds
of human resources in all aspects, of top management but is not being translated
organizational health, improvements in problem into action by the HRD departments. The
solving capabilities, diagnostic skills, existing structures and competencies are
capabilities to support all the other systems insufficient for this.
in the company, etc.
• HRD should help individuals to recognize their • In the absence of good potential assessment
potential and help them to contribute their systems and career development initiatives,
best to various organizational roles they are this is being highly neglected.
expected to perform.
• Maximize individual autonomy through • HRD departments have not undertaken
increased responsibility. structural interventions. They are also weak
in this part of OD interventions. However, to
the extent performance management systems
are focusing on this aspect, it gets done.
• Decentralization through delegation and • HRD function has not focused on this system-
shared responsibility. atically.
• Participative decision-making. • Participative performance appraisal systems
have facilitated this to a great extent.
Organizational diagnosis exercises also have
facilitated this. The participative culture has
largely increased and the HRD function does
have a role in these organizations.
• Balancing adaptation of the HRD system to the • HRD departments have largely contributed to
current organizational culture and changing the adaptation of HR systems to the existing
the culture. culture rather than attempting to change them.
It is only in the recent past with the use of
Balanced Score Card Approach in the
performance system that there is some
attempt to change the culture.
• Continuous review of the function and
renewal. • HRD audit and such other mechanisms are
being used occasionally. Continuous review
mechanisms are absent in these
organizations.
The usefulness of these frameworks and performance appraisal, feedback and counsel-
models to Asian organizations is doubtful unless ling, etc. If HR professionals have to use any of
implementation problems like the ones men- these models, the following are the important
tioned above are taken care of. Most of these prerequisites:
approaches give a strategic role to HR and treat • CEOs should be willing to treat their em
the HR professionals as partners in business. ployees as a strategic resource and give HR
Pareek and Rao's model gave this role to HRD
the status it deserves.
in 1975 by assigning a transformational role to
HR professionals though HRD systems like OD, • They should recognize HR professionals as
• A differentiated structure with separate HRD • None of the organizations has differentiated HRD
department and full-time staff. structures. Less than 50% have full-time HRD
staff.
• Six subsystems of HRD. • Only two of the subsystems are implemented
reasonably well. Training and performance apprais
al, potential appraisal, career planning, and OD
are weak.
• Interlinkages between subsystems. • Only performance appraisal is linked to training
and full potential of performance appraisal is not
used.
• Designed with 14 principles in focus. • The principles are not used though occasionally
some components figure in terms of company
values.
• Linked to other systems of HRF. • This is done by default as HRD does not have
a separate identity.
60
absent. attributes, team
appraisal, and ap-
praisal of effort put
in for subordi-
nate's development.
Potential No potential No potential No potential No potential No potential Mention in
Appraisal appraisal system. appraisal system. appraisal system. appraisal system. appraisal system. performance
appraisal through
recommendations
for potential
development.
Feedback Performance No system providing Performance Weak system Weak system of Limited to appraisal
and Counselling counselling and feedback or review develop- of feedback feedback giving at feed-back only.
feedback done twice counselling exists. ment at the giving. No the start of appraisal. Performance
in the year and start of appraisal counselling. Counselling absent. counselling non-
includes the only. existent.
appraisal exercise. Counselling absent.
Career Planning No career planning. No career planning Policy of career and Exists in form of
and Development in organization. succession planning "Reserve Pools," but
Career development documented. limited to highest
encouraged through two positions in
training only. departments only.
Vikalpa
Exhibit 1 Contd.
Training and T&D area of high Continuous Systematic T&D Employee Training Continuous through T&D needs
Development focus and throughout the year. needs identification and Development. Total Productivity identified through
importance. Also as part of done annually for Management Management for various sources
Post-training TQM, training needs functional, Committee identifies technical skills, post- and means.
presentations and identified, calendar behavioural and T&D needs quarterly training presentations Training calendar
reports mandatory. prepared, internal managerial skills. and continuously and reports. prepared for the
Library of such faculty identified and facilitates them. No scientific year and communi-
reports maintained. developed, post- Training calendar identification of cated to all.
training feedback prepared. training needs. Systematically done
monitored. and continuous in
the organization.
Organizational Weak. Employee satisfaction Culture building: Sporadic and not
Development surveys. annual day, sports. given adequate
Structure No separate HRD There is a separate HRD&IR is a com- HRD's functions HRD department Members of HR
61
department. Welfare- HRD department. bined department. operate under two was established in department are
oriented. H R D Personnel function HRD was initiated functions -P&IR and 1991-92. associated with
mainly in terms of separate and focuses in 1992 as an Technical Training A new complemen- quality forums and
appraisal and on worker welfare important activity. and competencies tary department has share the new
training. and administration. The Management Development Centre. relating to TQM, things they learn.
HRD function HRD activities job evaluation, and
bifurcated at the largely undertaken manpower audit and
next level into by the HRD section can work closely
IR&HRD. All of the P&IR with HRD.
personnel functions department.
handled b y t h e
D e p u t y General
Manager-P&IR.
Appraisals linked to
Performance Development review Annual performance increments training, Performance appraisal Good performance Annual appraisal
Appraisal process initiated in review system, not job rotation, identi- is one-sided given due takes place, where
1994 focusing on perceived to be fication of high-fliers, requiring appraiser consideration for appraisee is given
job goals, personal very transparent counselling, to assess the promotion. performance rating
traits, and personality. and open. promotion, etc. appraisee on a after discussing the
Includes joint number of qualities. entire year's
Vikalpa
appraisal on some performance.
Exhibit 1 Contd.
Potential Mention in appraisal Not currently being High potential High potential Potential appraisal 360 degree feedback
Appraisal system, not focused on introduced, succession candidates are candidates are does not exist. for unit head only.
or given required planning present in identified during identified during
attention to. some divisions. potential appraisal. potential appraisal.
Feedback and Performance feed- Quarterly feedback The HRD department Feedback from No system providing Feedback given after
Counselling back given during being introduced regularly conducts mentors and mentees feedback or 360 degree feedback.
review sessions. after the audit. exit interviews, collected regularly counselling.
Counselling weak. analyses the data, and action initiated
and gives feedback whenever possible.
to the top Training programmes
management. evaluated on the
basis of the feed-
back from faculty as
well as participants.
62
Short-term training In-house and
Training and Continuous activity, Technical training Structural training Technical, programmes for external training
Development individual department highly emphasized, activities being under- managerial, and professional programmes.
for T&D, training continuous activity, taken since 1989. behavioural program- knowledge and on- Functional and
calendar made every main focus on Technical training mes conducted the-job skills. A developmental
year, training needs competency building, and behavioural and regularly for all training centre at training needs
identified through high support from top management officers and staff. one location. discussed in
brainstorming and management, post- development are the Training needs performance review
interdisciplinary training data in-house programmes identified by the discussion.
meetings. collection weak. undertaken. Technical Training
and Management
Development Centre
(TTMDC).
Climate survey, Quality circle,
Organizational Managerial grid and A number of cultural Excellent worker Induction training, strategic planning, sports, cultural
Development effectiveness program- change initiatives development mentoring, job- learning culture, activities, kaizens,
mes conducted along introduced. programmes, training rotation, TTMDC, total quality, low small group
with periodic needs identification quality circles, shop resistance to change. activities.
diagnostic surveys. through appraisals^ floor committees.
mentoring, and role
model.
Vikalpa
References Pareek, U and Rao, T V (1998). Pioneering Human
Resources Development: The L&TSystem, Ahmedabad:
Curtis, B; William, E H and Sally, M (1995). Overview Academy of Human Resources Development,
of the People Capability Maturity Model, Carnegie (Publication of the Original Consultancy Reports,
Mellon University: Software Engineering Institute. 1975 and 1977).
Friedman, B; James, H and David, M W (1998). Rao, T V (1999). HRD Audit, New Delhi: Response
Delivering on the Promise: How to Attract, Manage Books (A Division of Sage Publications).
and Retain Human Capital, Arthur Andersen, New Ulrich, D and Lake, D (1990). Organizational Capa-
York: Free Press. bility: Competing from the Inside/Out, New York:
Wiley.
Pareek, U and Rao, T V (1975). HRD System in Larsen&
Toubro, Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Manage- Ulrich, D (1997). The Human Resource Champions: The
ment, Unpublished Consultancy Report. New Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results,
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Pareek, U and Rao, T V (1977). HR Function in Larsen Yeung, A K and Berman, B (1997). "Adding Value
& Toubro, Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Man-
through Human Resources: Reorienting Human
agement.
Resource Measurement to Drive Business Perform-
Pareek, U and Rao, T V (1982). Designing and Managing ance," Human Resource Management, Vol 36, No 3,
Human Resource Systems, New Delhi: Oxford & IBH. pp 321-335.