Hazardous Area Classification
using Quadvent
FEBRUARY 2018
Dr Mat Ivings, Dr Richard Goff
HSE Science and Research Centre
Summary
In this paper we discuss hazardous area classification (HAC), the safety regulations which require a HAC to be carried out as
part of your risk assessment, some of the challenges presented by HAC, and how the software tool Quadvent can be used to
help you complete your assessment quicker and more effectively.
Carrying out a HAC assessment can often be perceived as a difficult and time consuming task. It is clearly very important that
the conclusions from the assessment are appropriate to avoid the accidental ignition of flammable substances. The Quadvent
software tool helps make this task easier however, by providing output quickly that can be used directly in your HAC
assessments, managing your workplace risks and meeting the needs of the safety regulations.
DSEAR – the need for Hazardous Area Classification
The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR) apply to all workplaces in Great Britain
and cover risks to employees, contractors, visitors and the public. The regulations apply where dangerous substances
are or are liable to be present (for example materials classified under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging
(CLP) regulations as flammable or explosive). It is a requirement under DSEAR to ensure that the risks from dangerous
substances are eliminated or reduced so far as is reasonably practicable.
Regulation 5 requires a company to undertake an assessment of the risks from the dangerous substances present. The
assessment should be suitable and sufficient and include consideration of:
J The hazardous properties of substances including information provided by suppliers
J Work processes using hazardous substances, the amounts used and risks from a loss of containment
J Arrangements for safe handling, storage and transport for substances and waste
J Higher risk activities e.g. maintenance
When carrying out the risk assessment, Regulation 6 requires that consideration should be given to eliminating or reducing
of risks from dangerous substances so far as reasonably practicable, substituting with less hazardous substances where
possible. Where this is not possible the risks should be controlled and mitigated.
As part of the risk assessment, Regulation 7 requires that areas where explosive atmospheres could occur should be
identified as part of a Hazardous Area Classification exercise. These areas should be zoned and signs provided. In these
zones suitable ATEX1 compliant equipment and protective systems should be installed, and suitable work clothing provided. The
classification of these zones is known as area classification.
1
https://www.hse.gov.uk/fireandexplosion/atex.htm#whatatex
Hazardous Area Classification: further details
Grades of Release
As part of the process of hazardous area classification, releases of dangerous substances are divided into three categories
or grades:
Grade Description of release
Continuous Expected to occur frequently, or occur for long
periods
Primary Expected to occur occasionally during normal
operation
Secondary Not expected to occur during normal operation, and
if it does occur, is only likely for short periods
Zone Definitions
For outdoor releases or indoor releases with adequate ventilation, Continuous releases give rise to a Zone 0, Primary
releases give a Zone 1 and Secondary releases lead to a Zone 2. For less than adequate ventilation, Secondary releases
lead to a Zone 1 and Primary releases to a Zone 0, due to the ventilation not being sufficient to disperse the flammable
atmosphere. The adequacy of the ventilation can be judged from the size of the hypothetical gas cloud volume, Vz, or the
average concentration of flammable gas in the enclosure during a steady release.
If the hazard posed by a release is deemed to be so small that significant injury or damage to equipment won’t occur then
a zone can be defined to be of Negligible Extent (NE). This effectively means that the extent (or size) of the zone is set to be
zero.
Approaches to Hazardous Area Classification
There is a need to calculate zones in a cautious manner, but not to obtain overly conservative results, such that money can
be spent on ATEX equipment in areas of genuine risk and not wasted on excessively large zoned areas. Area classification
is often perceived to be difficult and many different sources of guidance are available.
Some of the more common sources of guidance are briefly reviewed below. The approaches include standard zone
sizes for specific types of equipment and/or estimation of zone sizes through calculations for each potential release. The
Quadvent software, described in more detail below, provides a quick and convenient way of defining the type and size of
zone for each specified release.
• HSE DSEAR Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) and Guidance (L138)
This publication provides advice on how to comply with the law, but does not specify how to classify and calculate the size
of zones. The legislation and guidance are not prescriptive and dutyholders can use any appropriate methodology in the
hazardous area classification exercise. This paper describes the use of the HSE system Quadvent but other systems and
software are available.
• BS EN 60079-10-1 Classification of Areas – Explosive Gas Atmospheres
The 2003 version of this standard introduced the concept of the hypothetical gas cloud volume, Vz, which is defined as ‘a
hypothetical gas cloud with an average concentration equal to half the lower flammable limit (LFL)’. This gas cloud volume can
be used to judge the degree of dilution and whether a release is of negligible extent (NE):
J If the value of Vz is less than 0.1 m3 then the zoned area is considered to be of negligible extent and protective equipment is
not required
J For secondary releases indoors, Zone 2 is applicable if Vz is less than the volume of the enclosure, but larger than 0.1 m3.
However, the methodology used to calculate Vz in the 2003 and 2009 versions of the standard was very conservative and could
lead to calculations of Vz several orders of magnitude larger than through using well-established gas jet models, including
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Quadvent (see Worked Example 1). The overall approach of linking the zone classification to
the size of Vz is sound and some validation of the approach has been published in the HSE Reasearch Report RR630.
The 2015 version of the standard, which was voted against by the UK, uses a completely new graphical method to assess the
degree of dilution and hazardous distance. The UK has concerns with some of the methodologies in this standard and these
are raised in the UK national foreword. In particular there are concerns that the methodology can produce non-conservative (i.e.
potentially unsafe) results in some circumstances and at times contradicts advice contained in other standards, such as those
described below. Work carried out by HSE supports this position.
• Energy Institute Model Code of Safe Practice Part 15: Area Classification for Installations Handling Flammable
Liquids (EI15), 4th Edition
This is a standard aimed at the petroleum industries and as such is typically concerned with high hazard sites dealing with large
quantities of flammable liquids and high pressure gases. It uses both direct examples for common facilities and a risk based
approach.
The concept of a Zone of negligible extent is not used in EI15 and the least onerous classification that can be obtained is a Zone
2 of ‘less than 1 m’.
• Institute of Gas Engineers and Managers Hazardous Area Classification of Natural Gas Installations (IGEM
SR25), 2nd Edition
This standard is used for classifying natural gas installations operating at pressures up to 100 bar. The standard contains a
detailed and somewhat complex methodology to assess ventilation rates taking into account factors such as the number of
release sources, the failure frequency of components and inspection intervals.
The available guidance above tends to provide simplified methods, e.g. by means of look-up tables or simple calculation
methods for specific types of release, that are generally conservative (excepting 60079-10-1:2015 in some cases). This
approach makes the HAC relatively quick but the associated generality can, in some cases, lead to excessive conservatism.
Quadvent: a scientific approach to Hazardous Area
Classification
Challenges with HAC methodologies
HSE has played a leading role within the UK on the development of scientific approaches to area classification over the last
ten or so years. The work started through a joint industry project led by HSE’s Buxton laboratory that was funded by HSE
and industry. The aim of this work was to develop a more scientifically based approach to area classification, which in the
past had been frequently based on rules of thumb or engineering judgement. The work was published by HSE in Research
Report RR630 (2008).
The output of this work was used as the basis for changes to the key industry area classification codes EI15 4th Edition
(2015) and IGEM/SR/25 Edition 2 (2010).
The Development of Quadvent
Initially Quadvent was developed as a very simple model that could be expressed as a single equation for estimating the
gas cloud volume Vz for pressurised gas releases. More details can be found in the papers by Webber et al (2011) and
Santon et al (2012). This was then built into software to make it easy to use as part of an area classification exercise.
The latest version of this software, Quadvent 2, adds functionality to also calculate hazardous areas from releases of
pressure liquefied gases, such as LPG, and buoyant plumes.
Quadvent uses well-established modelling methodologies based on research carried out over very many years studying
major accident hazards. The derivation of the gas jet model and its validation has been published in a peer reviewed
journal (Webber et al, 2011). Three further papers will shortly be submitted to peer-reviewed journals describing the three
models in Quadvent 2 including their validation against experimental data. The aim of the models is to provide realistic
estimates of the gas cloud volume Vz and zone extent, while not being overly conservative.
Features of Quadvent
J Quadvent is very easy to use and the calculations can be performed quickly by inputting the parameters of the release
and the environment into the graphical interface as shown in the worked examples below.
J Any hole size can be used to calculate the hazardous area in Quadvent. Different industry standards have different
approaches for specifying hole sizes for secondary grade releases ranging from small hole sizes used by the gas
industry (IGEM/SR/25) to much larger ones used in the petroleum industry (EI15). Users of Quadvent can use the hole
sizes that are most appropriate for their particular application.
J Quadvent can be used for both indoor and outdoor releases. One of its distinguishing features is the ability of the
models to account for the effect of the build-up of flammable gas within an enclosure on the gas cloud volume.
This feature is not generally included in even the most sophisticated consequence models. The software also provides a very
useful feature which allows the user to estimate natural ventilation rates based on the size and position of openings in an
enclosure.
J The outputs of Quadvent are tailored for use in a HAC assessment. Three measures of the ‘flammable gas cloud
volume’ are provided. These include the volume of gas above the lower flammable limit and the volume of gas above half the
lower flammable limit. More significantly though it provides an estimate of the gas cloud volume Vz which can then be
used to determine which zone should be applied based on the approach in BS EN 60079-10-1:2009. Although this version
of the standard has now been superseded, HSE Research Report RR630 showed that the general approach of using Vz to
determine the zone is valid, as long as an appropriate method, eg Quadvent, is used to calculate Vz.
J Quadvent also provides the calculated distances from the release point to the point where the gas concentration has
reduced to the lower flammable limit and half the lower flammable limit. These values can be used to specify the size of a
zone.
Quadvent software overview
Feature Benefit
Quick and easy-to-use Saves you time
Produces realistic Vz estimates Saves you money, for example, the capital and maintenance
costs of unnecessarily protecting electrical and non-electrical
equipment for use in hazardous areas
Uniquely calculates Vz both for ventilated Saves you time and money – one software tool can be used for
enclosed areas and for outdoors a variety of areas
Rigorously tested and validated Provides you with assurance and peace of mind: you can trust
the output of the tool
Provides realistic estimates of the Saves you time and money by providing comprehensive
natural ventilation rate of a building and information in one software tool
covers a variety of gas and liquid release
scenarios
Worked examples
The following examples demonstrate the difference that using Quadvent can make.
Worked Example 1: Outdoor
natural gas pipework
In this first simple example we
consider some outdoor natural gas
pipework operating at a pressure of Vz (m3) Zone
10 bar gauge. We can use a typical
hole size for a secondary release BS EN 60079-10-1:2009 93.9 Zone 2
from a flange or joint of 0.25 mm2
(BS EN 60079-10-1:2015). The Quadvent 0.002 Zone 2 NE
table shows the estimates of Vz
using both Quadvent 2 and the old
(2009) version of BS EN 60079-10-
1. The results highlight the over-
conservatism in the Vz equations in
the old standard as discussed above.
For Vz < 0.1 m3 this would indicate
that a Zone of negligible extent could
be applied.
Worked Example 2:
Ammonia release in a room
with forced ventilation
In this example we consider a release
of ammonia liquefied under pressure
from a refrigeration system. The
enclosure containing the refrigeration
system is force ventilated with 5 air
changes per hour. Figure 1 shows
the Quadvent 2 output where the
‘Choked two-phase flow model’ has
been used to calculate Vz. As Vz is
smaller than 0.1 m3 and the volume of
the enclosure is greater than 10m3, a
hazardous area classification of Zone 2
NE could be applied in this case.
Figure 1: Calculation of the hazardous volume, Vz, from Quadvent 2 for an indoor
release of pressure liquefied ammonia. The inset window shows the dialogue box
for inputting or adjusting the details of the source of the release
Worked Example 3:
Hydrogen pipework indoors
This example has hydrogen pipework
at 5 bar gauge in a naturally
ventilated enclosure. Secondary
sources of release (such as flanges
and valves) are considered. Two
Quadvent 2 calculations have been
carried out using a hole size of 0.25
mm2 (no adverse conditions) and 2.5
mm2 (adverse conditions).
The natural ventilation rate was
calculated in Quadvent 2 using the
natural ventilation model (see Figure
2). This resulted in a Zone 2 NE: Vz is
smaller than 0.1 m3 and the volume
of the enclosure is greater than 10
m3. Quadvent 2 also displays the Figure 2: Calculation of the hazardous volume, Vz, using Quadvent 2 for an indoor
background concentration (as a hydrogen release at 5 bar gauge. The inset window shows the dialogue boxes for
fraction of LFL) in the output window, calculating the ventilation rate for a naturally ventilated enclosure.
in this case it is 1 % LFL. Figure 3
shows the effect of changing the hole
size to 2.5 mm2 to represent adverse
conditions within the same enclosure.
In this case Vz is greater than 0.1
m3 and therefore a standard Zone 2
should be applied.
Figure 3: Calculation of the hazardous volume, Vz, using Quadvent 2 for an indoor
hydrogen release at 5 bar gauge. The inset window shows the dialogue box for
changing the hole size for a releases under adverse conditions.
Hazardous Area Classification training and advice
HSE’s Science and Research Centre in Buxton provides regular training courses on DSEAR and Hazardous Area
Classification, including the use of Quadvent. We can also deliver bespoke training relating to DSEAR, Hazardous Area
Classification and associated matters at your organisation.
With a wealth of knowledge in area classification and the DSEAR regulations, HSE scientists are also well placed to be able
to advise you on your area classification and DSEAR assessment needs. HSE scientists provide consultancy services to
help ensure DSEAR assessments and hazardous area classification are robust and correctly carried out. As our scientists
provide technical advice and support for HSE inspectors, work with relevant industry bodies at a national level, and
investigate when things go wrong, they are uniquely placed to provide you with relevant and pragmatic support.
Visit our Risk Management pages (https://solutions.hse.gov.uk/what-we-do/risk-management-and-process-safety) to see how
we can help you, or contact us on:
[email protected]Disclaimer
This paper and the work it describes were funded by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Its contents, including any
opinions and/or conclusions expressed, are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect HSE policy.
References and further reading
1. BS EN 60079-10-1:2015 Explosive atmospheres — Part 10-1: Classification of areas — Explosive gas atmospheres
2. Dangerous substances and explosive atmospheres. Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002.
Approved Code of Practice and guidance. L138 2013, HSE Books
3. EI 15, Model code of safe practice part 15, Area classification for installations handling flammable fluids, 4th edition, Energy
Institute (2015)
4. IGEM/SR/25, Hazardous area classification of natural gas installations, Edition 2, Institution of Gas Engineers and Managers
(2010)
5. Ivings M.J., Clarke S., Gant S.E., Fletcher B., Heather A., Pocock D.J., Pritchard D.K., Santon R. and Saunders C.J., 2008,
‘Area Classification for secondary releases from low pressure natural gas systems’ Health and Safety Executive Research
Report RR630 http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr630.htm
6. Santon R., Ivings M.J., Webber D.M and Kelsey A., New Methods for Hazardous Area Classification for explosive gas
atmospheres, Hazards XXIII, 12-15 Nov 2012 https://www.icheme.org/media/9046/xxiii-paper-44.pdf
7. Webber D.M., Ivings M.J. and Santon R.C., Ventilation Theory and Dispersion Modelling Applied to Hazardous Area
Classification. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 24, 612, 2011
