An Introduction To Tort Law in The UK
An Introduction To Tort Law in The UK
Imagine your neighbour builds a bonfire that sends thick smoke into your garden, ruining your
washing and making it impossible to sit outside. Or perhaps you slip on a wet floor in a
supermarket that had no warning sign, injuring yourself. These scenarios, where one party's
actions (or inaction) cause harm or loss to another, fall into the realm of civil law, specifically
Tort Law.
Unlike criminal law, which involves the state prosecuting individuals for acts deemed harmful to
society (like theft or assault), tort law deals with disputes between private individuals or entities
(including companies). It’s not about punishment like prison sentences; it’s primarily about
providing a remedy, usually financial compensation (known as damages), for the harm suffered
by the claimant (the person bringing the case) due to the actions of the defendant (the person
being sued). The core aim is to restore the injured party, as much as money can, to the position
they were in before the wrong occurred.
The most common type of tort is negligence. For a negligence claim to succeed, the claimant
must generally prove three key things:
1. Duty of Care: Did the defendant owe the claimant a duty to take reasonable care to
avoid causing harm? This concept was famously explored in the landmark case of
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932), involving a snail found in a ginger beer bottle. The case
established the "neighbour principle" – you owe a duty of care to those who could be
reasonably foreseeably affected by your actions or omissions. Drivers owe a duty to
other road users, doctors to patients, employers to employees, and shop owners to
customers.
2. Breach of Duty: Did the defendant fail to meet the standard of care expected of a
reasonable person in their position? This doesn't mean they had to be perfect, but did
their conduct fall below what society expects? For instance, a shop owner failing to clean
up a spill promptly might be a breach. The standard can be higher for professionals, like
surgeons, who are expected to possess specialist skills.
3. Causation and Damage: Did the defendant's breach of duty actually cause the
claimant's harm or loss, both in fact ("but for" the breach, would the harm have
occurred?) and in law (was the type of harm reasonably foreseeable)? The harm must
be a recognisable form of damage, such as physical injury, property damage, financial
loss, or psychiatric injury in some cases.
If all three elements are proven, the defendant is likely liable in negligence.
Even if a tort is proven, defendants might have defences. For example, volenti non fit injuria
(voluntary assumption of risk) or contributory negligence (where the claimant's own actions
contributed to their harm, potentially reducing their damages).
The primary remedy, as mentioned, is damages (compensation). In some cases, the court might
grant an injunction – an order requiring the defendant to stop doing something (like stop making
excessive noise in a nuisance case).