Feminist Criticism (1960s-present)

Feminist criticism is concerned with "...the ways in which literature (and other cultural
productions) reinforce or undermine the economic, political, social, and psychological
oppression of women" (Tyson 83). This school of theory looks at how aspects of our culture are
inherently patriarchal (male dominated) and aims to expose misogyny in writing about women,
which can take explicit and implicit forms. This misogyny, Tyson reminds us, can extend into
diverse areas of our culture: "Perhaps the most chilling example...is found in the world of
modern medicine, where drugs prescribed for both sexes often have been tested on male
subjects only" (85).

Feminist criticism is also concerned with less obvious forms of marginalization such as the
exclusion of women writers from the traditional literary canon: "...unless the critical or historical
point of view is feminist, there is a tendency to underrepresent the contribution of women
writers" (Tyson 84).

Common Space in Feminist Theories

Though a number of different approaches exist in feminist criticism, there exist some areas of
commonality. This list is excerpted from Tyson (92):
• Women are oppressed by patriarchy economically, politically, socially, and
psychologically; patriarchal ideology is the primary means by which women are
oppressed.
• In every domain where patriarchy reigns, woman is other: she is marginalized, defined
only by her difference from male norms and values.
• All of Western (Anglo-European) civilization is deeply rooted in patriarchal ideology, for
example, in the Biblical portrayal of Eve as the origin of sin and death in the world.
• While biology determines our sex (male or female), culture determines our gender
(scales of masculine and feminine).
• All feminist activity, including feminist theory and literary criticism, has as its ultimate
goal to change the world by prompting gender equality.
• Gender issues play a part in every aspect of human production and experience, including
the production and experience of literature, whether we are consciously aware of these
issues or not.
Feminist criticism has, in many ways, followed what some theorists call the three waves of
feminism:
• First Wave Feminism - late 1700s-early 1900's: writers like Mary Wollstonecraft (A
Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792) highlight the inequalities between the sexes.
Activists like Susan B. Anthony and Victoria Woodhull contribute to the women's
suffrage movement, which leads to National Universal Suffrage in 1920 with the passing
of the Nineteenth Amendment.
• Second Wave Feminism - early 1960s-late 1970s: building on more equal working
conditions necessary in America during World War II, movements such as the National
Organization for Women (NOW), formed in 1966, cohere feminist political activism.
Writers like Simone de Beauvoir (Le Deuxième Sexe, 1949) and Elaine Showalter
 established the groundwork for the dissemination of feminist theories dove-tailed with
the American Civil Rights movement.
• Third Wave Feminism - early 1990s-present: resisting the perceived essentialist (over
generalized, over simplified) ideologies and a white, heterosexual, middle class focus of
second wave feminism, third wave feminism borrows from post-structural and
contemporary gender and race theories (see below) to expand on marginalized
populations' experiences. Writers like Alice Walker work to "...reconcile it [feminism]
with the concerns of the black community...[and] the survival and wholeness of her
people, men and women both, and for the promotion of dialog and community as well as
for the valorization of women and of all the varieties of work women perform" (Tyson
107).
Typical questions:
• Is the author male of female?
• Is the text narrated by a male or female?
• What types of roles do women have in the text?
• Are the female characters the protagonist or secondary and minor characters?
• Do any stereotypical characterization of women appear?
• What are the attitudes toward women held by the male characters?
• How is the relationship between men and women portrayed?
• What are the power relationships between men and women (or characters assuming
male/female roles)?
• How are male and female roles defined?
• What constitutes masculinity and femininity?
• How do characters embody these traits?
• Do characters take on traits from opposite genders? How so? How does this change
others’ reactions to them?
• What does the work reveal about the operations (economically, politically, socially, or
psychologically) of patriarchy?
• What does the work imply about the possibilities of sisterhood as a mode of resisting
patriarchy?
• What does the work say about women's creativity?
• What does the history of the work's reception by the public and by the critics tell us
about the operation of patriarchy?
• What role does the work play in terms of women's literary history and literary tradition?
(Tyson)

Here is the Tyson source referenced above:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_literature/literary_theory_a
nd_schools_of_criticism/feminist_criticism.html