Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment
(ARC883) ASSIGNMENT
BY
FEBRUARY, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................................1
1.0 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................3
1.1 Background and Purpose of the EIA..................................................................................................3
1.2 Legal and Regulatory Framework......................................................................................................3
1.3 Scope of the Assessment...................................................................................................................5
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................6
2.1 Location and Key Landmarks.............................................................................................................6
2.2 Topography and Drainage Patterns...................................................................................................7
2.3 Soil and Geotechnical Conditions......................................................................................................8
2.4 Climate and Weather Considerations................................................................................................8
2.5 Existing Land Use and Vegetation......................................................................................................9
2.6 Accessibility, Infrastructure, and Utilities........................................................................................10
2.7 Description of the Proposed Development......................................................................................10
3.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS...........................................................................................12
3.1 Physical Environment (Climate, Soil, Hydrology).............................................................................12
Soil.....................................................................................................................................................12
Hydrology..........................................................................................................................................12
3.2 Biological Environment (Flora, Fauna, and Biodiversity)..................................................................13
Flora (Plant Life).................................................................................................................................13
Fauna (Wildlife Presence)..................................................................................................................13
Biodiversity Conservation..................................................................................................................14
3.3 Socio-Economic Environment (Demographics, Local Economy, and Community Stakeholders).....14
Demographics....................................................................................................................................14
Local Economy and Employment.......................................................................................................14
Community and Stakeholder Engagement........................................................................................14
4.0 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS..............................................................................................15
4.1 Positive Impacts (Educational, Economic, and Social Benefits)........................................................15
4.2 Negative Impacts (Environmental, Health, and Social Concerns)....................................................16
5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES......................................................................................................................16
1
5.1 Environmental Protection Strategies...............................................................................................16
5.2 Air, Noise, and Waste Management Measures...............................................................................16
5.3 Biodiversity Conservation Strategies...............................................................................................17
5.4 Sustainable Resource Utilization......................................................................................................17
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)...................................................................................17
6.2 Health, Safety, and Risk Management Plans....................................................................................17
6.3 Emergency Response and Contingency Measures...........................................................................17
7.0 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT...............................................................18
7.1 Community and Institutional Involvement......................................................................................18
7.2 Stakeholder Concerns and Responses.............................................................................................18
7.3 Social Responsibility and Institutional Benefits...............................................................................18
8.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................18
8.1 Summary of Key Findings.................................................................................................................18
8.2 Final Recommendations for Project Implementation......................................................................19
2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Purpose of the EIA
Caleb University has proposed the construction of a Twin-Lecture Theatre, a state-of-the-art
educational facility designed to enhance academic activities on campus. The lecture theatre will
accommodate 750 students in one hall and 500 in another, ensuring sufficient space for lectures,
seminars, and academic programs. The strategic location of this facility, opposite the Department
of Architecture, aligns with the university’s long-term development goals of expanding
infrastructure to meet the growing student population's needs. The design incorporates modern
teaching and learning technology, including smart boards, interactive projectors, high-quality
acoustics, and HVAC systems to optimize comfort and learning efficiency. Additionally, the
building will feature a basement level for added functionality, potentially serving as an
exhibition space, resource centre, or storage area.
Given the project’s scope and scale, it is imperative to conduct an Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) to evaluate potential environmental, infrastructural, and socio-economic
impacts associated with its construction and operation. This assessment will Identify and analyze
possible environmental risks, including air and noise pollution, waste generation, water drainage
concerns, and biodiversity disruption, Ensure that the project complies with local, state, and
federal environmental regulations , Develop mitigation strategies to minimize negative impacts
while maximizing sustainability and eco-efficiency and , Provide recommendations for an
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that will oversee safety, resource utilization, and
regulatory compliance throughout the project’s lifecycle. By integrating sustainability practices
into the project design, the Twin-Lecture Theatre will serve as a model for environmentally
responsible development, contributing to academic growth, job creation, and enhanced learning
facilities at Caleb University.
I. Establishes environmental quality standards for air, water, and land use.
II. Ensures that the project minimizes soil degradation, pollution, and ecosystem
disturbances.
II. Enforces compliance with drainage, wastewater, and energy efficiency guidelines.
II. Ensures that all facilities comply with safety and accessibility standards.
II. Guides the integration of green spaces, water conservation techniques, and
climate-responsive architecture into the building design.
By ensuring compliance with these regulatory frameworks, the Twin-Lecture Theatre project
will uphold best practices in sustainable development, risk management, and environmental
stewardship.
4
1.3 Scope of the Assessment
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will cover a comprehensive evaluation of the
project’s potential environmental, infrastructural, and socio-economic impacts. This assessment
spans the entire lifecycle of the project, from pre-construction and construction to post-
construction and operational phases. The environmental considerations will focus on air and
noise pollution, assessing emissions from construction equipment, increased traffic, and site
activities that could impact air quality and the acoustic environment. Water management will
also be a key aspect, ensuring that stormwater drainage, wastewater treatment, and flood
prevention measures are effectively implemented. Soil and geotechnical stability will be
examined to evaluate land grading, excavation effects, and the risks of soil erosion. Additionally,
the impact on vegetation and biodiversity will be assessed, including the loss of green cover,
potential ecosystem disruptions, and the necessary mitigation strategies. From an infrastructural
and technical perspective, the assessment will evaluate energy efficiency and resource
utilization, exploring the potential incorporation of solar energy, passive cooling techniques, and
water conservation methods. Waste management strategies will be reviewed to determine the
best approach for handling construction debris, recyclables, and sustainable disposal techniques.
Structural safety and durability will also be assessed to ensure compliance with seismic, wind,
and climate resilience standards, safeguarding the long-term sustainability of the lecture theatre.
The socio-economic considerations will include an analysis of job creation and its impact on the
local economy, focusing on employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and
local vendors. The project’s academic and institutional benefits will be examined, particularly
how it enhances the learning environment, research capabilities, and student engagement spaces.
Additionally, the assessment will address community and stakeholder engagement, considering
concerns from faculty, students, and nearby residents to ensure that the development aligns with
their expectations and needs. The findings of this assessment will contribute to a well-structured
Environmental Management Plan (EMP), ensuring that the project aligns with best
environmental practices, sustainability goals, and university development policies. The EMP will
provide a framework for monitoring compliance, implementing mitigation measures, and
promoting long-term environmental stewardship throughout the project's lifecycle.
5
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS
2.1 Location and Key Landmarks
The proposed site for the Twin-Lecture Theatre is strategically located within the Caleb
University campus, opposite the Department of Architecture (COLENSMA Building). This
location was carefully selected based on its accessibility, proximity to existing academic
buildings, and minimal environmental disruption. The site is currently an undeveloped portion of
the campus, with a moderate slope of approximately 4 meters and scattered vegetation. Several
key landmarks surround the project site, serving as reference points and contributing to its
accessibility and integration within the campus layout. To the north, the site is bordered by the
Caleb University Cafeteria, a central hub for student and staff dining. To the east, it is adjacent to
the main school building, which houses administrative offices and lecture rooms. To the south, it
is in proximity to the Department of Architecture and other faculty buildings, making it an ideal
location for hosting large academic gatherings. To the west, the site is near the university staff
quarters, ensuring that faculty members and staff have easy access to the facility. The strategic
positioning of the Twin-Lecture Theatre allows for seamless integration with existing campus
infrastructure, ensuring smooth pedestrian and vehicular access. The site is well connected to
internal road networks, making it easily accessible for students, faculty, and visitors.
Additionally, its location within the core academic zone of the university ensures that it
complements existing learning spaces and student activity centres. Given its topography,
environmental setting, and proximity to essential campus landmarks, the proposed site presents a
suitable and sustainable location for the development of the Twin-Lecture Theatre. Careful
planning will be undertaken to ensure that the project preserves the natural landscape, optimizes
land use, and enhances the overall campus experience.
6
Fig 1.1 Site Location
Notable landmarks covered during field survey are: Caleb university cafeteria, main school
building, architecture building and Caleb staff quarters.
7
2.3 Soil and Geotechnical Conditions
A preliminary assessment of the soil and geotechnical conditions of the site indicates that the
area is characterized by sandy-clay soil, which provides a moderate to good load-bearing
capacity. This type of soil is common in the Ikorodu region and is generally suitable for
structural developments. Despite its stability, variations in soil composition, moisture content,
and compaction levels may require further geotechnical testing before construction. The presence
of clay fractions means that the soil may retain water, leading to differential settlement if not
properly managed. To mitigate this risk, the foundation design will incorporate soil stabilization
techniques, such as compaction, grading, and the use of granular fill materials. Given the scale of
the Twin-Lecture Theatre, a deep foundation system such as pile foundations or raft foundations
may be necessary to support the heavy structural loads and distribute weight evenly.
Additionally, drainage considerations will be integrated into the foundation design to prevent
waterlogging and soil weakening.
8
cooling systems to enhance indoor comfort.
II. Incorporation of green spaces around the facility to enhance aesthetics and sustainability.
III. Use of permeable surfaces to maintain natural groundwater infiltration and prevent
excessive runoff.
9
By integrating sustainable landscaping techniques, the project will preserve environmental
integrity while accommodating development needs.
The proposed site is strategically positioned within Caleb University, ensuring seamless
accessibility and connectivity with the campus infrastructure. The site is well connected to the
university’s internal road network, which links key academic and administrative buildings,
allowing for easy pedestrian and vehicular movement. Vehicular access will be facilitated
through existing road networks, and provisions will be made for dedicated parking spaces,
pedestrian walkways, and emergency access routes to accommodate students, faculty, and
visitors.
Essential infrastructure and utilities will also be considered in the project’s design, including:
I. Electricity Supply: The university is connected to the national power grid, supplemented
by on-campus power generators and potential solar energy solutions to ensure an
uninterrupted power supply.
II. Water Supply: A combination of municipal water distribution and borehole systems will
provide sufficient water for drinking, sanitation, and firefighting needs.
III. Sewage and Waste Management: The site will be integrated into the university’s sewage
system, ensuring efficient wastewater disposal and environmental compliance.
By leveraging the university’s existing infrastructure, the project will enhance operational
efficiency while maintaining environmental sustainability.
I. Two large lecture halls with seating capacities of 750 and 500 students, equipped with
smart boards, high-quality acoustics, and advanced audio-visual systems.
10
II. A basement level, which will serve as a flexible space for exhibitions, conferences, or
additional student activities.
III. Energy-efficient lighting and HVAC systems to improve indoor comfort and minimize
energy consumption.
IV. Enhanced accessibility features, including ramps, elevators, and designated seating areas
for persons with disabilities.
The implementation of the project will be carried out in four key phases:
I. Site Preparation: This will involve land clearing, soil testing, and geotechnical
assessments to establish a solid foundation.
II. Construction Phase: This includes structural development, installation of utilities, and
interior finishing to ensure compliance with building codes and environmental
regulations.
III. Operational Phase: Once completed, the lecture halls will be used for academic lectures,
seminars, research activities, and institutional events.
IV. Decommissioning and Restoration: If required in the future, plans will be made for long-
term maintenance, upgrades, or adaptive reuse of the facility.
11
3.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
3.1 Physical Environment (Climate, Soil, Hydrology)
Climate
Caleb University, located in Imota, Ikorodu, Lagos, experiences a tropical monsoon climate,
characterized by distinct wet and dry seasons. The rainy season typically extends from April to
October, with an annual rainfall ranging between 1,500mm and 2,000mm. This period is
associated with high humidity, frequent downpours, and occasional thunderstorms, which can
affect construction activities and require effective stormwater management. The dry season,
spanning November to March, is marked by lower humidity levels, higher temperatures, and the
presence of Harmattan winds, which can introduce dust particles and reduce air quality. The
average annual temperature in the area ranges between 25°C and 35°C, making it essential for
the Twin-Lecture Theatre to incorporate climate-responsive architecture, including shading
devices, natural ventilation, and energy-efficient cooling systems. Wind patterns in the region are
influenced by southwest monsoon winds during the wet season and northeast Harmattan winds
during the dry season. While the moist monsoon winds increase the likelihood of material
degradation, the dry Harmattan winds introduce fine dust particles, necessitating proper air
filtration systems within the lecture theatre.
Soil
A geotechnical survey of the site indicates that the soil is predominantly sandy-clay, which offers
a moderate to good load-bearing capacity. However, the presence of clay fractions suggests that
soil compaction and moisture retention could be potential concerns. These conditions will be
addressed by implementing soil stabilization techniques, such as grading, compaction, and
reinforcement with granular materials. To ensure the structural integrity of the Twin-Lecture
Theatre, a detailed geotechnical investigation will be conducted to determine the moisture
content, compaction levels, and bearing capacity of the soil. Given the scale of the project, deep
foundation solutions, such as pile foundations or raft foundations, may be required to enhance
stability and prevent differential settlement.
Hydrology
The site for the Twin-Lecture Theatre features a moderate slope of approximately 4 meters,
which naturally directs surface runoff towards lower-lying areas. Without proper drainage
measures, there is a risk of water accumulation, erosion, and flooding. A stormwater
12
management plan will be implemented to ensure efficient water drainage and flood prevention.
Key components of this plan will include:
By incorporating effective drainage solutions, the project will minimize hydrological disruptions,
ensuring that the construction and operational phases do not negatively impact surrounding
infrastructure.
II. Integration of green spaces around the building to maintain ecological balance.
III. Use of indigenous plants in landscaping to support biodiversity and reduce irrigation
needs.
II. Create alternative green corridors within the university to support displaced fauna.
13
III. Limit construction activities to designated zones to preserve surrounding biodiversity.
Biodiversity Conservation
Although the site is not ecologically sensitive, it contributes to the broader biodiversity of Caleb
University. The incorporation of green infrastructure within the lecture theatre’s design will help
maintain habitat connectivity, improve air quality, and support pollinators like bees and
butterflies.
I. Construction workers, engineers, and laborers involved in site preparation and building
works.
Additionally, the presence of a larger lecture theatre may attract academic conferences, seminars,
and workshops, fostering growth in local hospitality, transportation, and retail sectors.
14
I. Students and Faculty: Beneficiaries of improved academic infrastructure.
III. Local Community Members: Residents and business owners in Imota, Ikorodu, who may
be affected by construction activities.
The findings of this baseline socio-economic assessment will guide the development of policies
aimed at maximizing the project’s benefits while mitigating potential disruptions.
Economically, the construction and operation of the lecture theatre will create employment
opportunities for construction workers, engineers, suppliers, and maintenance staff. Additionally,
the increased student population and academic activities will stimulate local businesses,
including food vendors, bookstores, and transportation services. Socially, the lecture theatre will
serve as a multi-purpose facility, hosting large-scale seminars, workshops, and special university
events. This will enhance student engagement, promote institutional growth, and attract
academic collaborations with external organizations.
15
4.2 Negative Impacts (Environmental, Health, and Social Concerns)
Despite the benefits, the project may also result in adverse environmental, health, and social
effects. Land clearing and excavation could lead to soil erosion, habitat destruction, and
increased surface runoff, potentially causing flooding and waterlogging if not properly managed.
Construction activities may generate dust, noise pollution, and air emissions, which could
negatively impact air quality and contribute to respiratory issues among students and faculty.
Health concerns may arise from exposure to dust, noise, and construction-related hazards,
putting workers and university occupants at risk. Additionally, improper waste disposal from
construction and operational activities could result in environmental degradation if not properly
controlled. Social concerns include traffic congestion, disruption of academic activities, and
temporary inconvenience to students and staff due to the movement of construction materials and
equipment. These challenges must be addressed through proper planning and mitigation
strategies to ensure minimal disturbance to university operations.
16
5.3 Biodiversity Conservation Strategies
Efforts will be made to protect existing flora and fauna in the area by minimizing unnecessary
vegetation clearing. A landscaping and reforestation program will be introduced to restore any
lost greenery. Sustainable urban design elements, such as tree-lined walkways and rooftop
gardens, will be incorporated to support biodiversity and enhance the aesthetic value of the
university environment.
Regular environmental audits and assessments will be conducted to ensure that the project meets
the required environmental standards. Air and water quality will be monitored to detect any
potential contamination. Construction activities will be reviewed periodically to ensure that
environmental protection strategies are being effectively implemented.
17
delays, environmental hazards, or regulatory non-compliance issues. First aid stations and trained
emergency response teams will be available on-site to handle medical emergencies.
18
8.2 Final Recommendations for Project Implementation
To ensure that the project is environmentally sustainable and complies with all regulatory
standards, the following recommendations are proposed:
I. Strict implementation of mitigation strategies, including air and noise pollution controls,
erosion prevention measures, and waste management protocols.
II. Adoption of green building principles, such as renewable energy integration, water
conservation strategies, and passive cooling techniques.
III. Regular monitoring and environmental audits to track progress and ensure compliance
with sustainability goals.
IV. Active engagement with stakeholders to address concerns and enhance community
participation in project decision-making.
By integrating these recommendations, the Twin-Lecture Theatre project will serve as a model
for sustainable development and academic excellence, benefiting Caleb University and its
surrounding community.
19