Ogj 20061009
Ogj 20061009
Contents Zoom In Zoom Out For navigation instructions please click here Search Issue Next Page
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
World-class communications
anywhere in the world. ™
Digital Telephony
Real-time Video
www.CapRock.com
R E L I A B I L I T Y T O T H E E X T R E M E™
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Oct. 9, 2006
Volume 104.38
P R O C E S S C O N T R O L TE C H N O L O G Y
Workshops identify threats to process control systems 44
Annie McIntyre, Jason Stamp, Ben Cook, Andrew Lanzone
PROCESS CONTROL—1: Best practices improve control system performance 52
David Shook
REGULAR FEATURES
Newsletter ....................................... 5
Calendar ........................................ 12 COVER
An operator controls an element of a processing plant with
Journally Speaking ........................... 17 next-generation automation and control systems—a Honey-
well Experion PKS and newly designed vertical series C I/O.
Editorial ........................................ 19 Process control systems are becoming more important as refiners
and petrochemical plant operators focus on them to improve
Area Drilling .................................. 32 operations. This issue’s special report, Process Control Technol-
ogy, begins on p. 44 with an article that discusses the issues of
Equipment/Software/Literature ......... 64 cyber and physical security risks to process control systems. The
second article, p. 52, discusses a holistic, best-practices approach
Services/Suppliers ........................... 64 that helps refiners and petrochemical plant operators sustain and
improve the performance of control system assets. Photo from
Statistics ........................................ 65 Honeywell Process Solutions.
Classifieds ...................................... 68
Advertisers’ Index ............................ 71
The full text of Oil & Gas Journal is available through OGJ Online, Oil & Gas Journal’s
internet-based energy information service, at http://www.ogjonline.com. For information, send
Editor’s Perspective/Market Journal ..... 72 an e-mail message to [email protected].
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Complementary technologies
easily installed in new or
existing facilities
#1 licensor of alkylation
technology with 100%
operating permit success
HF alkylation – as
safe or safer than
sulfuric with better
economics
Technology developer/operator –
real-world experience translates
into real-world benefits
Improved safety
levels by up to 90%
Maximize alkylate yield & safety while minimizing costs. Pick the brains with hands-on experience.
As a leading technology developer and owner-operator, we have the mindset to deliver alkylation technologies for low-sulfur,
high-octane fuels. Backed by unmatched experience, ConocoPhillips’ technologies perform beyond expectation. Our
ReVAP™ Reduced Volatility Alkylation Process delivers ultimate peace of mind – recognized by a third-party safety advisor as
providing safety levels that meet or exceed those of sulfuric acid alkylation. Combine this with our Inventory Management
Process (IMP™) for even higher levels of safety – with rapid transfer of the catalyst to a dedicated receiver in as little as
90 seconds. Boost your capacity at minimal cost with our Split Olefin Feed Technology (SOFT™), while reducing your cost per
barrel. Optimum benefits. Lower costs. It’s a no-brainer. ConocoPhillips. Performing today. Preparing for tomorrow.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
PROCESSING Washington
Tel 703.963.7707
Special Report: Workshops identify threats to process control systems 44 Washington Correspondent Nick Snow, [email protected]
Annie McIntyre, Jason Stamp, Ben Cook, Andrew Lanzone
Special Report: PROCESS CONTROL—1: Best practices improve Los Angeles
control system performance 52 Tel 310.595.5657
David Shook Senior Correspondent Eric Watkins, [email protected]
OGJ News
TR A N S P O R T A T I O N Please submit press releases via e-mail to: [email protected]
Copyright 2006 by PennWell Corporation (Registered in U.S. Patent & Trademark Office). All rights reserved. Oil & Gas Journal or any part thereof
may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transcribed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and PennWell Corporate Headquarters
recording, without the prior written permission of the Editor. Permission, however, is granted for employees of corporations licensed under the Annual 1421 S. Sheridan Rd.,Tulsa, OK 74112
Authorization Service offered by the Copyright Clearance Center Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Mass. 01923, or by calling CCC’s Customer
Relations Department at 978-750-8400 prior to copying. Requests for bulk orders should be addressed to the Editor. Oil & Gas Journal (ISSN 0030-
1388) is published 47 times per year by PennWell Corporation, 1421 S. Sheridan Rd., Tulsa, Okla., Box 1260, 74101. Periodicals postage paid at Tulsa,
Okla., and at additional mailing offices. Oil & Gas Journal and OGJ are registered trademarks of PennWell Corporation. POSTMASTER: send address P.C. Lauinger, 1900-1988
changes, letters about subscription service, or subscription orders to P.O. Box 3497, Northbrook, IL 60065, or telephone (800) 633-1656. Change of Chairman Frank T. Lauinger
address notices should be sent promptly with old as well as new address and with ZIP code or postal zone. Allow 30 days for change of address. Oil & President/Chief Executive Officer Robert F. Biolchini
Gas Journal is available for electronic retrieval on Oil & Gas Journal Online (www.ogjonline.com) or the NEXIS® Service, Box 933, Dayton, Ohio 45401,
(937) 865-6800. SUBSCRIPTION RATES in the US: 1 yr. $49, 2 yr. $75, 3 yr. $99; Latin America and Canada: 1 yr. $54, 2 yr. $90, 3 yr. $125; Russia and
republics of the former USSR, 1 yr. 500 rubles; all other countries: 1 yr. $99, 2 yr. $165, 3 yr. $240, 1 yr. basic digital $49 worldwide, 1 yr. premium digital
$79 worldwide. These rates apply only to individuals holding responsible positions in the petroleum industry. Single copies are $10 each except for
100th Anniversary issue which is $20. Publisher reserves the right to refuse non-qualified subscriptions. Oil & Gas Journal is available on the Internet at
http://www.ogjonline.com. (Vol. 104, No. 38) Printed in the US. GST No. 126813153. Publications Mail Agreement Number 602914. Return Undeliver-
able Canadian Addresses to: P.O. Box 1632, Windsor, ON N9A 7C9.
Member Audit Bureau of Circulations & American Business Media
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
38 Flavors of Simulation
38 Years of Simulation
Convert to PRO/II® the easy way. See the SIM4ME translator in action at www.simsci-esscor.com.
©2006 Invensys Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Invensys, SimSci-Esscor, The Power of Simulation3, SIM4ME and Pro/II are trademarks of Invensys plc or its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. All other product names may be the trademarks of their respective owners.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Oct. 9, 2006
International news for oil and gas professionals
For up-to-the-minute news, visit www.ogjonline.com
General Interest — Q u i c k Ta k e s
Analysts see robust future for oil sands that most often these rivers have been made unsuitable for spawn-
The outlook for Canadian oil sands growth continues to im- ing,” Mitvol said.
prove, although the next 2 years could prove critical as oil compa- Mitvol said at least 3 months would be needed to draw up a full
nies face the risks of increasing cost overruns and project delays, picture of the state of Aniva Bay after construction work has been
said Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. Inc. carried out there for the Sakhalin-2 project.
In a Sept. 29 research note update on oil sands, an FBR analyst
said increasing project proposals also increase the risk profile for Concerns aired over Brazil lease round exclusions
the Canadian oil sands because of an already tight labor market. Some international oil company executives have voiced con-
“We believe that the risks of cost overruns and project delays cerns about Brazil’s National Petroleum Agency (ANP) excluding
will be increasing over the next 2 years, with the greatest risk be- the Campos basin and parts of the Santos basin from the country’s
ing borne by those who have yet to firm up their cost estimates Nov. 28 licensing round.
and to order key critical equipment,” said Amir Arif, FBR senior Excluding these areas from the 8th licensing round makes it
vice-president. “less attractive,” Alvaro Teixeira, executive secretary of the Brazilian
He estimates 25-30% cost inflation from 2004 levels for new Petroleum & Gas Institute, told OGJ.
projects that will be firmed up in 2007 with risk of an additional Most of the field development activity undertaken by interna-
10-20% cost overruns related to labor, steel, and line pipe costs, tional firms is concentrated in the Campos basin, which produces
along with infrastructure and logistic issues. 80% of Brazil’s output of 1.8 million b/d of oil.
Noting that the number of oil sands projects planned in Alberta “Is the exclusion of these basins a sign that there will be chang-
have been steadily climbing, FBR estimates the cumulative capital es concerning policies for future licensing rounds?” Teixeira posed.
to be spent in the oil sands, based on announced projects, amounts “Brazil’s Mines and Energy Minister Silas Rondeau reaffirmed that
to more than $125 billion (Can.) This is a 140% increase from the rounds will continue as normal and that the 9th Round will
FBR’s 2003 estimate of $52 billion. probably be announced right after the 8th round. We will see,” he
The increase is a result of both new projects being announced said.
and additional cost pressures on previous cost estimates, Arif The IBP executive said: “In the short term, there will be a re-
said. duction in the rhythm of annual investments in exploration. In the
medium and long terms, there will be a postponement in invest-
Sakhalin-2 project faces more authorization woes ments to develop potential commercial discoveries of exploration
Part of the pipeline built for the Sakhalin-2 project may have work that was also postponed. The end result will be a reduction in
been built without proper government authorization, according the pace and or maintenance of the present rate of oil production
to Oleg Mitvol, deputy head of the Russian Federal Service for the in the next 6-7 years.” IBP is a 50-year-old, nonprofit, private orga-
Regulation of the Use of Natural Resources (Rosprirodnadzor). nization with 220 associates including most of the multinationals
Mitvol said the pipeline segment in question was built near the operating in Brazil.
village of Sovetskoye and passes through the Zubrovyy nature re- ANP placed 284 blocks on offer in the upcoming 8th Round
serve. He believes that segment was constructed after “unauthor- (OGJ Online, Sept. 12, 2006). The blocks being offered are in seven
ized rerouting.” sedimentary basins and are considerably less in number than ANP’s
He said, “This is a crime punishable by law. We will examine the previous announcement of 1,153 blocks in 18 basins.
situation and transfer all the evidence to the prosecutor’s office.” ANP justified excluding the Campos basin by saying, “A wide
Meanwhile, starting Oct. 2 Rosprirodnadzor began taking aerial selection of acreage is to be put up for auction, including areas
photographs of the complete pipeline, which was built as part of considered to have great potential for both oil and gas, new fron-
the Sakhalin-2 project. The photographic results will be compared tier blocks, and blocks in mature areas.”
to the relevant documents on file to establish whether there are ANP considers 35 offshore areas as high potential blocks, 153
discrepancies between existing work and work authorized. offshore blocks as new frontier basins, 47 onshore blocks as new
Rosprirodnadzor inspectors flew over a 200-km section of the frontier basins (with little geological data), and 49 blocks in on-
pipeline route by helicopter on Sept. 29. The survey revealed areas shore mature basins.
prone to mud slides due to pipeline construction, Mitvol said.
He also noted the presence of incorrectly constructed crossings CAPP: Don’t upset Canada’s investment climate
over rivers. “There are problems over many crossings, which mean Speaking at the International Pipeline Conference & Exposi-
tion in Calgary, Kathy Sendall, Petro-Canada senior vice-president,
Oil & Gas Journal 5
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
I n d u s t r y S c o r e b o a r d
IPE BRENT / NYMEX LIGHT SWEET CRUDE
$/bbl
US INDUSTRY SCOREBOARD — 10/9
63.00
62.00
4 wk. 4 wk. avg. Change, YTD YTD avg. Change,
61.00
Latest week 9/29 average year ago1 % average year ago* %
60.00
59.00 Demand, 1,000 b/d
58.00
57.00 Motor gasoline 9,684 8,897 8.9 9,760 9,126 6.9
56.00
Distillate 4,343 4,114 5.6 4,111 4,099 0.3
Se p t. 2 7 S e p t. 2 8 S e p t. 2 9 Oct. 2 Oct. 3 Jet fuel 1,604 1,606 –0.1 1,601 1,620 –1.2
Residual 602 1,039 –42.1 766 891 –14.0
Other products 5,188 4,441 16.8 4,928 4,903 0.5
TOTAL DEMAND 21,421 20,097 6.6 21,165 20,638 2.6
WTI CUSHING / BRENT SPOT Supply, 1,000 b/d
$/bbl
62.00 Crude production 5,127 4,214 21.7 5,101 5,278 –3.4
61.00 NGL production 2,379 1,475 61.2 2,209 1,768 24.9
60.00 Crude imports 10,829 9,078 19.3 10,244 10,066 1.8
59.00
Product imports 3,380 3,976 –15.0 3,483 3,295 5.7
Other supply2 1,147 1,166 –1.7 1,087 1,272 –14.6
58.00
TOTAL SUPPLY 22,861 19,910 14.8 22,123 21,679 2.0
57.00
56.00 Refining, 1,000 b/d
55.00
S e p t. 2 7 S e p t. 2 8 S e p t. 2 9 Oct. 2 Oct. 3 Crude runs to stills 15,666 13,974 12.1 15,166 15,420 –1.6
Input to crude stills 16,153 14,371 12.4 15,581 15,697 –0.7
% utilization 93.2 83.9 — 90.6 91.7 —
NYMEX NATURAL GAS / SPOT GAS - HENRY HUB Latest Previous Same week Change,
$/MMbt Latest week 9/29 week week* Change year ago* Change %
5.80
5.40
Stocks, 1,000 bbl
5.00
Crude oil 325,255 322,542 2,713 300,150 25,105 8.4
4.60 Motor gasoline 217,810 220,606 –2,796 197,970 19,840 10.0
4.20 Distillate 146,558 149,535 –2,977 128,017 18,541 14.5
3.80 Jet fuel 41,376 41,005 371 36,301 5,075 14.0
3.40 Residual 43,574 45,424 –1,850 32,960 10,614 32.2
3.00
S e p t. 2 7 S e p t. 2 8 S e p t. 2 9 Oct. 2 Oct. 31 Futures prices3
Light sweet crude, $/bbl 62.41 61.07 1.34 66.05 –3.64 –5.5
Natural gas, $/MMbtu 4.84 4.86 –0.01 13.42 –8.58 –63.9
IPE GAS OIL / NYMEX HEATING OIL
¢/gal 1
178.00
Based on revised figures. 2Includes other hydrocarbons and alcohol, refinery processing gain, and unaccounted for crude oil.
3
176.00 Weekly average of daily closing futures prices.
174.00
172.00
170.00
168.00
166.00
164.00
Se p t. 2 7 S e p t. 2 8 S e p t. 2 9 Oct. 2 Oct. 3
BAKER HUGHES INTERNATIONAL RIG COUNT: TOTAL WORLD / TOTAL ONSHORE / TOTAL OFFSHORE
3,300 3,174
149.00 800
147.00 600 537
145.00 400 353
143.00
S e p t. 2 7 S e p t. 2 8 S e p t. 2 9 Oct. 2 Oct. 3 200
7/15/05 7/29/05 8/12/06 8/26/05 9/9/05 9/23/05 7/14/06 7/28/06 8/11/06 8/25/06 9/8/06 9/22/06
1 Not available at press time. 7/22/05 8/5/05 8/19/05 9/2/05 9/16/05 9/30/05 7/21/06 8/4/06 8/18/06 9/1/06 9/15/06 9/29/06
2 Nonoxygenated regular unleaded. Note: End of week average count
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
North American natural gas, and chair of the Canadian Association US House panel approves pipeline safety bill
of Petroleum Producers, implored the Canadian government to not The US House Energy and Commerce Committee passed a bill
“do anything stupid” regarding terms of investment in projects in Sept. 27 reauthorizing federal oil and gas pipeline safety programs.
the country. It now has to be reconciled with a similar measure passed June 19
Sendall said Canada’s transparent and stable investment climate by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee before there
acted as a balance to the relatively high production costs in the re- can be a final vote on the House floor.
gion and that any adjustments to terms of investments should only Passage of the latest House pipeline bill by voice vote came
be undertaken with the utmost caution, lest this balance be upset. hours before Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Com-
Sendall also said continued progress needs to be made to keep mittee leaders introduced their own pipeline safety bill.
Canada’s regulatory process untangled, making particular note of Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Ark.) and chief minor-
the manifold jurisdictions currently required to weigh in on any ity member Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hi.) sponsored the measure to
pipeline project before actual work can begin. reauthorize the federal Pipeline Safety Act for 4 years starting in
Even so, Sendall cited the combination of Canada’s resource 2007, with Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) as
base, innovative technology, competitive global position, and envi- cosponsors. Other provisions include a 50% increase in the num-
ronmental stewardship as key factors that will allow the country to ber of federal pipeline inspectors to 135 from 90 at a cost of $6
succeed as it sets a course toward becoming an “energy superpow- million over 4 years, application of Department of Transportation
er.” She also said “pipeliners should be salivating” at the prospect standards to all low-stress pipelines, and new civil enforcement
of bringing Canada’s hydrocarbon resources to market. authority against excavators and pipeline operators responsible for
third-party damage. ✦
Mariner makes Gulf of Mexico discovery contract went to Italy’s Snamprogetti SPA and the Khurais gas con-
Mariner Energy Inc., Houston, said it has made a material dis- tract was let to a consortium of Hyundai Engineering & Construc-
covery with its 5ST1 well on High Island Block 116 in the Gulf of tion Co. Ltd. and Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd.
Mexico. The Khurais program covers three oil fields: Khurais, Abu Jifan,
The well, drilled to a TMD of 14,683 ft, encountered about 540 and Mazlij. The Khurais gas facility will process sour associated
ft of net vertical pay in 13 sands. Completion operations are under gas produced from the three fields into an NGL product and a dry,
way, and initial production is expected later in the fourth quarter. single-phase sour shipping gas. The plant will process a total of 563
Mariner estimates that the well’s proved and probable gas re- MMscfd of sour associated gas and 70,000 b/d of condensate.
serves could be about 40-60 bcf. The company holds 100% work- The program is the largest crude increment undertaken in Ar-
ing interest and a 72% net revenue interest in the well. amco’s history, the company said, and one of the largest industrial
HI Block 116 is part of the asset base Mariner acquired from projects being executed in the world today. The program is slated
Forest Oil Corp. in March. for completion by mid-2009.
Snamprogetti’s contract calls for construction of four identical
Total-led group tests Yemeni oil well crude processing and gas compression trains, along with the con-
A group led by Total SA reported the KHA 1-16 oil well in Ye- struction of inlet and outlet facilities to receive wet and sour crude
men’s East Shabwa Development Area on Block 10 produced more through upstream trunklines.
than 8,400 b/d when tested through a 70⁄64-in. choke, said partici- The Hyundai-Foster Wheeler contract includes construction of
pant Soco International PLC, London. two gas conditioning trains, crude and NGL storage facilities, prod-
Test results extend Khairir oil field to the east beyond current uct shipping facilities, and flares.
3D seismic survey data, Soco said. The well was drilled on the east- All related support facilities, such as roads, ponds, buildings,
ern-most 3D seismic parameter as part of a continuing appraisal electrical systems, and process control systems, are also to be pro-
and development of the field’s basement reservoir. vided under these contracts.
KHA 1-16 spudded June 5 and reached a MD of 3,298 m. The
group will evaluate the well results to decide the best way to access Max Petroleum completes second Kazakh well
the extension, Soco said. Max Petroleum PLC, London, has completed and begun pro-
Block 10 participants are operator Total and Soco’s Comeco Pe-duction from the ZMA-2X well, the second of five wells planned
troleum Inc., each with 28.57% under a production-sharing agree- on the Zhana Makat A structure on the E Block in the Pre-Caspian
ment with Yemen. Other joint venture partners are Occidental Ye- basin of Kazakhstan.
men Ltd. 28.57% and Kuwait Foreign Petroleum Exploration Co. ZMA-2X, drilled downdip from the ZMA-1X discovery well to
14.29%. further delineate the field, encountered an oil column about 18 m
thick, exceeding the company’s initial expectations for the well.
Aramco lets two Khurais development contracts As with the discovery well, the ZMA-2X production will be in-
Saudi Aramco has signed two contracts for the development of creased gradually to ensure minimal reservoir damage.
its 1.2 million b/d Khurais Increment Program. The Khurais crude Max plans to announce the production volumes when the ini-
8 Oil & Gas Journal / Oct. 9, 2006
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
tial well testing is complete. crease of 45 b/d from its initial rate in mid-September. Max is
The operator also has begun drilling its ZMA-4X well, to be fol- continuing to evaluate the well and optimize its production.
lowed shortly by the ZMA-3X and ZMA-5X. These three additional The initial drilling program on Zhana Makat A is scheduled for
wells are further updip on the Zhana Makat A structure, where the completion in mid-November, and Max will then have the struc-
company believes the oil column thickness may exceed that seen in ture’s reserves independently certified before yearend.
the flank areas drilled by the first two wells. Max said it intends to drill up to 30 shallow wells, 6 intermedi-
The discovery well is producing about 225 b/d of oil, an in- ates, and 3 deep wells by the end of 2007. ✦
Hull, topsides completed for Independence Hub Stone resumes Amberjack platform production
Atlantia Offshore Ltd., Houston, has completed integration of Stone Energy Corp., Lafayette, La., has resumed production
the hull and topsides of its deep-draft semisubmersible for the from its Amberjack platform on Mississippi Canyon Block 109 in
Independence Hub plat- the Gulf of Mexico. The platform had been shut down due to dam-
Atlantia Offshore Ltd. form on Mississippi Canyon ages caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
integrates the hull Block 920 in the Gulf of Stone repaired and rerouted a severed oil pipeline and expects
and topsides of its
DeepDraft Semi for Mexico. production of 50-60 MMcfd of net gas equivalent during the
the Independence Hub The operation was com- fourth quarter. This brings Stone’s overall fourth-quarter produc-
development. Photo pleted Sept. 20 at the Kiewit tion to 250 MMcfd of gas equivalent.
from Atlantia. Offshore Services facility Stone said limited oil production from the Amberjack platform
in Ingleside, Tex. Kiewits’s was initially restored in early September via barging.
heavy lifting device was Stone is the operator on MC Block 109 and holds a 100% inter-
used to set the 8,400-ton est since this summer (OGJ, July 17, 2006, p. 30). It also owns a
deck onto the 10,000-ton 24.8% interest in Block 108.
hull.
Additional hookup and Mariner resumes Gulf of Mexico production
commissioning activities Mariner Energy Inc., Houston, has restarted production at Ochre
are expected to continue and Pluto gas fields in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
over the next several weeks. Ochre field, on Mississippi Canyon Block 66, has resumed pro-
The Hub will then be duction of 10.5 MMcfd of gas equivalent (gross). The field was
towed to another location shut-in due to damages caused by Hurricane Ivan in 2004.
to be moored in about 8,000 ft of water. Once installed, the Atlan- On MC Block 718, Mariner has brought Pluto production on
tia DeepDraft semisubmersible will connect to a 24-in. export gas stream. The field is expected to flow at 40-50 MMcfd of gas equiva-
line, and will have the capacity to connect to 16 infield flowlines lent (gross). The field was originally shut-in for the drilling and
and 12 umbilicals from an initial 10 ultradeepwater fields. Total completion of a new well, but start-up was delayed due to Hur-
designed throughput of the process facility will be 1 bcfd of gas. ricane Katrina last year.
Independence Hub is owned 80% by Enterprise Products Part- Mariner holds a majority interest in and is operator of these
ners LP and 20% by Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc. Anadarko two fields.
Petroleum Corp. will operate the hub on behalf of Atwater Valley The company estimates that most of its remaining 2005 hur-
Producers Group, which is comprised of Anadarko, Dominion Ex- ricane-related production shutins will restart in the fourth quar-
ploration & Production, Hydro Gulf of Mexico LLC, Devon Energy ter. ✦
Corp., and Energy Resources Technology.
Processing — Q u i c k Ta k e s
Huntsman lets contract for Port Arthur repairs Huntsman said it also will accelerate some maintenance work
Huntsman Corp., Salt Lake City, let a $60 million engineering, at the facility that was scheduled for a 2010 turnaround and in-
procurement, and construction contract to Shaw Group Inc., Baton spection. Performing the work now will make the plant run more
Rouge, La., for repairs to Huntsman’s olefins manufacturing plant efficiently, the company said.
in Port Arthur, Tex. The facility, damaged by fire in April, has pro- The maintenance work will not extend the time required to
duction capacity of 1.4 billion lb/year of ethylene and 800 million repair and restart the facility.
lb/year of propylene.
The total cost of the cleanup, engineering, and rebuild is es- Coker contract awarded for Tatarstan refinery
timated at $110 million. The project is slated for completion in CJSC Nizhnekamsk Refinery has let a contract to Foster Wheeler
second quarter 2007. Ltd. subsidiary Foster Wheeler USA Corp. to design a process pack-
age involving its proprietary delayed coking technology.
Oil & Gas Journal / Oct. 9, 2006 9
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
The coker will be part of an integrated refining and petrochem- share in any third-party royalties from the past or future licensing
ical grassroots complex to be constructed at Nizhnekamsk in Ta- of the technology by ExxonMobil.
tarstan, Russia. The companies will continue to collaborate on their other ven-
The contract’s terms were not disclosed. Foster Wheeler also has tures in Saudi Arabia.
the front-end engineering design contract for the integrated com-
plex (OGJ, Sept. 25, 2006, Newsletter). Hydrocracker due Cartagena refinery
In the coking contract, Foster Wheeler will provide its thermal Repsol YPF SA has selected IFP NA subsidiary Axens NA’s tech-
conversion process to upgrade heavy residue feed and process it nologies for the planned expansion of its 100,000 b/cd Cartagena
into transport fuels. refinery in Murcia, Spain.
The new refining train will include a 50,000 b/d hydrocracker
Sabic, ExxonMobil settle technology dispute that will convert a blend of heavy vacuum and heavy coker gas-oils
Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (Sabic) said it has reached a full and into high-quality, ultralow-sulfur middle distillates for the Euro-
final settlement of its disputes with ExxonMobil Corp. concern- pean market.
ing technology and a patent that can be used in the production of Axens is committed also to provide a C5-C6 alkane isomerization
polyethylene. unit to boost gasoline pool octane, two hydrodesulfurization units
Under terms of the settlement, Sabic and its affiliates will have to produce ultralow-sulfur diesel from straight run and light coker
the right to use the technology without royalties and will equally gas-oil, and a coker naphtha HDS unit.
The new facilities are scheduled to start up in fourth quarter
2010. ✦
Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n — Q u i c k Ta k e s
Gas deliveries to UK begin through new pipeline November and come on stream in early 2008.
Gassco AS on Oct. 1 began gas deliveries from Statoil ASA-oper- During the first 10 years of plant operation, Santos Ltd. will
ated Sleipner and Troll fields in the Norwegian North Sea to Eas- supply up to 37 petajoules of gas feedstock from its 45% share of
ington in the UK after opening flow through the 600 km southern production in the John Brookes gas field operated by Apache En-
leg of the new Langeled pipeline. ergy Australia in the offshore Carnarvon basin. Gas deliveries will
This marks the completion of the first stage of the 1,200-km be via the Dampier-Bunbury gas trunkline.
submarine gas pipeline, the cost of which currently is estimated at
17 billion kroner—about 3 billion kroner below budget. ABS issues design approval for CNG carriers
“We will complete all pipelaying on the northern leg this week, The American Bureau of Shipping has issued full-class design
which means we’ll manage to finish ahead of the winter season,” approval for CNG carriers to Sea NG Corp., Calgary. The approval is
said Leif Solberg, Langeled project director. the first granted to CNG carriers, ABS said.
“The project has progressed on schedule,” he added. “What re- Sea NG’s proprietary Coselle system uses small-diameter high-
mains now is subsea connections and testing on the northern leg strength steel pipe coiled into a carousel to store the high-pressure
until next summer.” gas. Each Coselle will comprise about 10 miles of 6-in. pipe used
The northern leg, due to start up in 2007, lies in 360 m water as for storing and transporting CNG.
far as Sleipner East field (OGJ Online, Sept. 18, 2006, Newsletter). Sea NG is expected to let contracts for construction of three
It is designed for an internal pressure of 250 bar, corresponding to Coselle CNG carriers later this year. These first vessels, which will
water 2,500 m deep, a record for Norway’s gas transport system. carry the notation “A1 CNG Carrier,” will be designed to transport
The Langeled system will have a total capacity of 20 billion cu gas 200-2,000 miles. They are intended to service projects in the
m/year, one fifth of Britain’s annual gas requirements. This supple- Caribbean or Mediterranean seas.
ments the 12 billion cu m/year Vesterled system, which transports The vessels will be 120 m long and have the capacity to carry 50
gas from the BC Hydro-operated Heimdal platform to St. Fergus MMscf of gas in 16 Coselles (160 miles of pipe). The 16 Coselles
in Scotland. are arranged in four stacks of four high in a fully enclosed and
inerted cargo house on the weather deck. The vessels will feature a
Wesfarmers plans Western Australia LNG terminal dual fuel propulsion system with bow thruster and also a propri-
Perth industrial conglomerate Wesfarmers Ltd. plans to build a etary high- and low-pressure manifold system for efficient loading
$138 million (Aus.), 175-tonne/day LNG terminal and regasifi- and unloading.
cation plant in Kwinana, south of Perth in Western Australia. The ABS Project Manager Harish Patel said, “This vessel design re-
plant will supply natural gas for heavy-duty trucks as well as do- view and approval was undertaken using a risk-based design ap-
mestic industrial and electric power generation markets. proach.”
The company says that several years of trials involving 70 trucks This included a series of risk assessment studies, including HA-
traveling more than 12 million km around Australia, has shown ZID, HAZOP, gas dispersion, and explosion models, fire, flaring and
that LNG is a viable alternative to diesel fuel. heat radiation analysis, a jetting study, escape and evacuation stud-
Construction of the Wesfarmers plant is scheduled to begin in ies, and inspectability analysis. ✦
10 Oil & Gas Journal / Oct. 9, 2006
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
see more
Greater opportunity requires a unique vantage point across your entire enterprise.
Honeywell is more than an industry leader in process automation, we also offer cutting-edge
technology and the services you need to oversee and optimize your plant’s operation. Our
applications go beyond the control system, allowing you to view your plant data in context
as well as integrate other relevant intelligence. Our offerings in cyber and physical security, wireless solutions,
and advanced applications like process modeling and simulation, better optimize your facility while keeping
your people safe. At Honeywell, we can help you see the information you need to make better decisions
faster for increased production, improved business performance and greater profit.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
C a l e n d a r
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Annual International NGT2006@gastechnology. West China International Oil API Fall Refining and Equip- (918) 584-2555, (918) website: www.energyinst.org.
Petroleum Environmental org, website: www.gastech & Gas Conference & Exhibi- ment Standards Meeting, San 560-2694 (fax), e-mail: uk. 7.
__
Conference, San Antonio, nology.org. 22-25. tion, Xinjiang, +44 (0) 207 Francisco, (202) 682-8000, [email protected], website:
(918) 631-3088, e-mail: 596 5233, +44 (0) 207 (202) 682-8222 (fax), www.aapg.org. 5-8. IADC International Well
[email protected], website: IPAA Annual Meeting, Grape- 596 5106 (fax), e-mail: e-mail: [email protected], Control Conference &
www.cese.utulsa.edu. 17-20. vine,Tex., (202) 857-4722, [email protected], website: www.api.org. Oct. Abu Dhabi International Exhibition, Abu Dhabi,
(202) 857-4799 (fax), 30-Nov. 1. Petroleum Exhibition & Con- (713) 292-1945, (713)
World LP Gas Forum & website: www.ipaa.org/meet- website: www.ite-exhibitions. ference (ADIPEC), Abu Dhabi, 292-1946 (fax), e-mail:
Global Technology Conference, ings. com/og. 24-27. [email protected], website:___
www.
__ 23-25. Carbon Capture and Storage +971 2 4446900,
Chicago, (202) 452-8975, in the UK Conference, London, +971 2 4446135 (fax), iadc.org. 7-8.
(202) 452-9054 (fax), e- Power-Gen India & Central Annual Condensate & Naphtha +44 (0) 20 7467 7100, e-mail: [email protected],
mail: willis@propanecouncil. Asia Conference, New Delhi, Forum, Phuket, +65 6222 +44 (0) 20 7255 1472, website: www.adipec.com. ✦Annual Petroleum Exhibi-
org, website: www.wlpgasfo-
_______ (918) 831-9160, (918) 0230, +65 6222 0121, e- e-mail: [email protected]. 5-8 tion & Conference of Mexico,
rum2006.com. 17-20. uk, website: www.energyinst. Villahermosa, (713) 529-
_______ 831 9161 (fax), e-mail: mail: condensate@cconnection. 1616, (713) 821-1169
[email protected], org, website: www.cconnection. org.uk. 31. Purvin & Gertz Latin America (fax), e-mail: sales@ieimail.
Annual Border Energy Forum, website: www.pgen.events. org. 30-31.
__
LPG Seminar, Panama City, com, website: www.oilonline.
Tampico,Tamaulipas, (512) pennnet.com. 24-26. NOVEMBER (713) 236-0318, (713) com/mexico. 7-9.
463-5039, e-mail: Soll. Chad International Oil & Gas AAPG International Confer- 331-4000 (fax), website:
[email protected]. DryTree & Riser Forum, ence and Exhibition, San Juan, www.purvingertz.com/semi- ✦International Marine Gas
Conference, N’Djamena, +44
TX.US, website: www.glo.state. College Station,Tex., (918) 584-2555, (918) nars. 6-9.
__ CNG Standards Forum, St.
tx.us/energy.border. 19-20. (918) 831-9160, (918) 207 596 5148, +44 207 560-2694 (fax), e-mail:
_________ John’s, Newf., (709) 754-
831-9161 (fax), e-mail: 596 5071 (fax), e-mail: [email protected], website: Oil Depletion Confer- 9880, (709) 754-9881
GTI’s Natural Gas Tech- [email protected], colins.tchanga@ite-exhibi www.aapg.org. 4-7. ence, London, +44 (0) 20 (fax), e-mail: info@cmcng.
nologies Conference, Orlando, website: www.drytreeforum. tions.com, website: ___
www. 7467 7100, +44 (0) com, website: www.cmcng.
(847) 768-0940, (847) __ com. 24-26. african-events.com. 30-31. AAPG International Confer- 20 7255 1472, e-mail: com. 7-9.
__
768-0858 (fax), e-mail: ence & Exhibition, Perth, [email protected],
_____________________
_____________________
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
C a l e n d a r
PIPELINE ONSHORE/OFFSHORE/SUBSEA
PROCUREMENT
Purchasing, Expediting, Traffic & Logistics, Supplier Quality,
Materials Management
PROJECT CONTROLS
CONTRACTS
International experience and the flexibility to relocate are preferred for all of
our positions. Join us in building on a family heritage spanning more than
100 years, and create in an environment that honors by uncompromising
safety, mutual achievement and the highest business ethics.
Bechtel offers competitive compensation and benefits packages
including relocation assistance, and is an Equal Opportunity Employer.
______________________________________
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Petrochem Arabia Confer- [email protected], ✦Renewable Energy in the 2007 Deepwater Operations Confer- Multiphase Pumping &
ence, Dubai, +44 (0) 1242 website: www.intertechusa. New Low Carbon Britain ence & Exhibition, Galveston, Technologies Conference
529 090, +44 (0) 1242 __ com. Nov. 30-Dec. 1. Conference, London, +44 Tex., (918) 831-9160, & Exhibition, Abu Dhabi,
529 060 (fax), e-mail: (0) 20 7467 7100, +44 JANUARY (918) 831-9161 (fax), e- (918) 831-9160, (918)
(0) 20 7255 1472, e-mail: Petrotech India Conference mail: registration@pennwell.
[email protected], DECEMBER 831-9161 (fax), e-mail:
[email protected], and Exhibition, New Delhi, com, website: www.deepwater-
website: www.wraconferences. Independent Operators Forum, website: www.energyinst.org.
_______ [email protected],
+44 (0) 20 8439 8890, operations.com. 23-25.
com. 26-27.
__ London, (918) 831-9160, uk. 5. _______ website: www.multi-
______
_ +44 (0) 20 8439 8897
(918) 831-9161 (fax), e- phasepumping.com. 10-13.
_________
(fax), e-mail: adam.evan- ✦SPE Hydraulic Fracturing
IADC Drilling Gulf of Mex- mail: registration@pennwell. OSEA International Exhibi [email protected], website:
ico Conference & Exhibition, com, website: _______
www.operators- tion & Conference, Singapore, www.petrotech2007.com. Technology Conference, College SPE Middle East Oil &
Houston, (713) 292-1945, _____forum.com. 4-6. +44 20 7840 2139, +44 15-19. Station,Tex., (972) 952- Gas Show & Conference
(713) 292-1946 (fax); e- 20 7840 2119 (fax), e-mail: 9393, (972) 952-9435 (MEOS), Bahrain, +44
mail: [email protected], website: Seatrade Middle East Maritime [email protected], web- (fax), e-mail: [email protected], 20 7840 2139, +44 20
www.iadc.org. 28-29. Conference & Exhibition, site: www.allworldexhibitions. Offshore Asia Conference & website: www.spe.org. 29-31.
7840 2119 (fax), e-mail:
Dubai, +44 1206 545121, com. 5-8.
__ Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur,
[email protected], web-
Power-Gen International +44 1206 545190 (fax), e- (918) 831-9160, (918) FEBRUARY site: www.allworldexhibitions.
Annual CO2 Flooding Confer- 831-9161 (fax), e-mail: NAPE Expo, Houston,
Conference, Orlando, (918) mail: events@seatrade-global. ence, Midland,Tex., (432) [email protected], (817) 847-7700, (817)
com. 11-14.
__
831-9160, (918) com, website: www.sea
trade-middleeast.com. 4-6. 552-2430, (432) 552- website: _______
www.offshoreas- 847-7704 (fax), e-mail:
831-9161 (fax), e-mail: 2433 (fax), website: www. iaevent.com. [email protected], website: International Petrochemicals
___ _____ 16-18.
[email protected], spe-pb.org. 6-8. www.napeonline.com. 1-2. & Gas Technology Conference
GASTECH International
website: www.pgen.events. Conference & Exhibition, & Exhibition, London, +44
API Exploration and Produc-
pennnet.com. 28-30. Abu Dhabi, +44 (0)1895 Annual China Gas Conference, tion Winter Standards Meeting, IPAA Small Cap Conference, (0) 20 7357 8394, e-mail:
454 592, +44 (0)1895 Beijing, 65 6536 8676, 65 Boca Raton, Fla., (202) 857- [email protected],
Ethanol Summit, Houston, 454 584 (fax), e-mail: 6536 4356 (fax), e-mail: Scottsdale, Ariz., (202) 682- 4722, (202) 857-4799 website: www.europetro.com.
[email protected], 8000, (202) 682-8223
(207) 781-9617, (207) [email protected], website: (fax), website: www.ipaa. 12-13.
781-2150 (fax), e-mail: website: www.abf-asia.com. (fax), website: www.api.org.
www.gastech.co.uk. 4-7. 11-12. 22-26. org/meetings. 5-8.
13 Days:
The Pythagoras Conspiracy
by oil industry veteran
L. A. Starks
“13 Days weaves a gripping suspense plot around the
very real, and complex operations of oil refining. The
attention to detail and factual content is extraordinary,
while creating a spellbinding story that we hope could
not be real.”
KS - - - vice president, energy industry consulting firm
“Very realistic. Thankfully, most weeks aren't as intense as these are.”
CR - - - oil company vice president
“This was a very fast-paced book! I couldn't put it down! It is a superb blend
of the oil business, current events, and international intrigue. I felt like I was
experiencing a front-page news story.”
Kathy Norderhaug - - - former international oil executive
“A great thriller, in the tradition of John Grisham and Dick Francis. Full of
interesting insights into the energy business, 13 Days features a tightly woven
plot and vivid characters.”
Mike Barron - - - retired energy CFO and senior vice president
www.lastarksbooks.com
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS
A
JOURNAL
F
______________
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS
A
JOURNAL
F
B
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
J o u r n a l l y S p e a k i n g
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Regardless of how good something may appear, a closer examination can reveal
that a change, however slight, can have quite an impact.
Competitive pressures demand us all to seek constant improvements and this is at the
heart of the technology and consultancy services we offer.
If you’d like to explore the potential improvements that our global operating experience
could bring to your business, let’s talk.
Europe: +31 70 377 2470 Americas: +1 281 544 8844 Asia Pacific: +60 3 2170 3888 www.shell.com/globalsolutions
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
E d i t o r i a l
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
GE N E R A L I N T E R E S T
To guarantee its oil supply during nies. In peacetime, they will operate for
times of crisis, China is building a na- profit. Yet, in an oil crisis, state-owned
tional tanker fleet with which it aims to vessels would stand ready to be pressed
haul nearly three fourths of its oil im- into service.
ports within the next 15 years.1 China’s
tanker-building program appears to be Beijing’s tanker fleet
driven by a complex mix of commercial By 2010, China intends to transport
and national security factors as it seeks 40-50% of its oil imports in govern-
control over its entire oil supply chain. ment-owned tankers. By 2020, it hopes
The impact of this fleet-building to carry 60-70%.2 Chinese analysts
program on world tanker predict that by 2010 the country will
rates and shipbuilding costs need as many as 40 very large crude
China seeks oil security merits the attention of
tanker operators worldwide.
carriers (VLCCs) and a fleet capable of
transporting more than 700 million
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
GE N E R A L I N T E R E S T
of “long range rapid responses and
C HINESE SHIPYARDS’ PROPORTION OF GLOBAL TANKER ORDERS Fig. 4
interventions in trouble spots” such as
35
Malacca.9 Indeed, Wu Lei, a prominent
Chinese energy expert, said, “The fear
30
that the US might cut [energy ship-
Global newbuild orders, %
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS
A
JOURNAL
F
______________________________________
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS
A
JOURNAL
F
B
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
GE N E R A L I N T E R E S T
cally make long-distance crude hauls
C HINA’S OVERLAND VS. MARITIME IMPORTS Fig. 5
that are beyond the reach of the small
100
98
coastal and shuttle tankers that com-
96 prise the bulk of mainland China’s
94 Pipeline imports tanker fleet.
Total China imports, %
92
90 How much security?
88
86
It appears that, without a substan-
84 tial blue-water naval capability (likely
82 decades away), China may be painting
80 Maritime imports a bull’s-eye on itself by constructing a
78 state-controlled Chinese-flagged tanker
76
74
fleet.
72 China is strengthening its oil trans-
70 portation capacity to ensure “smooth
2003
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Estimated and uninterrupted” oil deliveries in
Sources: People’s Daily Energy Intelligence, Asia Pulse, Prime-Tass times of crisis. Yet national tanker fleets
do not protect oil importers from the
internal security risks endemic to many
size profits over political interests. Chinese analysts even suggest that a lack oil exporting countries. Such instability
Accordingly, a number of analysts of coordination among the state energy generally does not affect oil shipments
propose buying or renting existing producers and the state energy shippers once they get offshore. Rather, many
tankers in order to save money and is partially to blame for the low propor- Chinese analysts fear that in a show-
reduce the possibility of creating over- tion of crude imports carried on Chi- down over Taiwan or other crisis, the
capacity in the maritime oil transport nese ships.6 In response, they suggest US Navy and its allies might blockade
market.14 Assuming that China hopes to some potential structures for a national energy shipments to China.21 However,
profit from tanker operations, second- tanker fleet, which are shown in Table 3. blockading oil shipments to China
hand ships are indeed a better bet than The Chinese government will prob- would likely only occur if a shooting
newbuilds. For example, a second-hand ably have to give economic incentives war had already broken out. A blockade
280,000 dwt VLCC operating on the such as low-interest loans to Chinese of China would adversely affect the
Saudi Arabia-China route pays out in tanker owners to entice them to work global economy and trigger economic,
9.8 years at World Scale 65 charter rates, more closely with China’s national political, and military alienation of the
while a newbuild tanker would require energy companies. At present, an esti- blockading power.
14 years to pay out.15 The second- mated 90% of China’s oil shipping ca- One way a national tanker fleet
hand ship option seems to be gaining pacity, or more than 10.8 million dwt, might increase oil supply security
strength, as state-owned Sinotrans Ltd. is being used to serve foreign clients.18 would be for the PLA Navy (PLAN) to
and other Chinese tanker operators are This number is significant in absolute escort Chinese tankers through contest-
said to be actively scouring the VLCC terms but would not help China’s long- ed areas. Chinese “hawks” believe that
market for second-hand ships.16 distance oil transport situation because the PLAN must modernize because its
few of these ships are the VLCCs needed ability to secure vital SLOCs and ensure
Fleet structures to bring crude from the Middle East, the safety of China-bound oil shipments
As shown in Fig. 3, seven Chinese Africa, and other distant locales. “seriously lags” behind China’s growing
companies now possess government- Political obstacles hinder efforts to import demand.22 The idea of sending
5
issued crude oil shipping licenses. All build a Chinese tanker pool. Bringing naval forces to escort tankers is hardly
but two of these license holders are Hong Kong shippers into any mainland unprecedented. When the Iran-Iraq
state-controlled.17 The tanker compa- consortium would help China expand “tanker war” heated up in 1987, the US
nies may be likened to China’s state oil its crude shipping capacity. Yet China’s Navy guarded tankers bringing oil out
producers because they compete among three main oil producers have so far of the Persian Gulf.
themselves yet are collectively expected refused to sign deals with Hong Kong However, without complete PLA
to act in the Chinese national interest. ship owners, claiming that their fleets naval and air superiority in a given sea
Like the state oil companies, it is un- are “too small.”19 In reality, of Hong zone, carrying oil on Chinese flag ships
likely that the shippers will be entirely Kong’s 72 registered tankers, at least actually makes the People’s Republic
driven by a comprehensive state policy 7 can carry a million bbl or more of of China (PRC) more vulnerable to
that orchestrates their every move. Some crude oil.20 Such ships could economi- energy supply interdiction in the event
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
GE N E R A L I N T E R E S T
Hormuz and other oil shipment choke Problem,” China Energy, Vol. 26, No. 7, 19. Grinter, Mike, “Liu Slams
points. July 2004, pp. 4-7. Beijing’s Reluctance to Open Up Oil
In addition, the number of tank- 7. Xixing, Lin, “Examining China’s Import Trade: Hong Kong Vessels
ers transiting key choke points would Energy Transport Strategy,” Southeast Kept Out of Domestic Oil Carriage,”
most likely far exceed any potential Asian Studies, No. 2, 2005, pp. 46-50. Lloyd’s List, Feb. 23, 2006, Lexis-Nexis,
blockader’s physical ability to control 8. Deqin, Su, Zhang Yongxin, and (http://web.lexis-nexis.com).
uncooperative ships with means short Huang Lei, “The World Oil Shipping 20. Hong Kong Ming Wah Shipping
of disabling fire. Market and China’s Energy Security,” Co., July 5, 2006, (http://www.hkmw.
It is hoped that these realities willWorld Shipping, Vol. 28, No. 1, Febru- com.hk/webappen/index.asp).
come to inform energy security poli- ary 2005, pp.11-14. 21. Daojiong, Zha, “Three Ques-
cymaking in Beijing and Washington. 9. Jie, Li, “China’s Oil Demands and tions about China’s Future Oil Security,”
Global energy security can improve Sea Lane Security,” Jianquan Zhishi, China Petroleum Enterprise.
if China overcomes its mercantilist September 2004, pp. 10-13. 22. Wenmu, Zhang, “China’s Energy
inclinations and relies on the world oil 10. Shaojun, Li, “Mahan’s Sea Power Security and Policy Choices,” World
market to fulfill its oil and oil trans- and Its Influence on China’s Oil Security Economics and International Politics,
portation needs. A minority of Chinese Strategy,” International Forum, Vol. 6, 2003, No. 5, pp. 11-16.
analysts, such as Zha Daojiong, now No. 4, July 2004, pp. 16-20. 23. Laiqun, Yue, “Unavoided Malac-
advocates a greater reliance on global 11. Angang, Chen, “Malacca: Ameri- ca Strait,” China Petroleum Enterprise,
energy markets and a turn away from ca’s Coveted Strategic Outpost,” Modern September 2005, p. 6.
mercantilism.27 Washington would gain Ship, December 2004, pp. 11-14. 24. Clayton, Mark, “Does the
by giving China a place at the table 12. “China Gives Green Light to US Face an Engineering Gap?” The
through International Energy Agency Myanmar Oil Pipeline,” Agence France Christian Science Monitor, Dec. 20,
membership, advising China as it cre- Presse, Apr. 18, 2006, (http://www.uo-
___________ 2005, (http://www.csmonitor.
ates a full-fledged energy ministry and faweb.ualberta.ca/chinainstitute/nav03.
___________________________ com/2005/1220/p01s01-ussc.htm).
strives for a sustainable energy future. cfm?nav03=45306&nav02=43617&nav
___________________________ 25. Qinlin, Meng, “Reduce Risk by
In the meantime, China’s growing oil 01=43092).
________ Rapidly Developing a Safely Built and
tanker fleet stands to substantially affect 13. Lei, Wu, Shen Qinyu, “Will Completely Mastered Oil Tanker Fleet,”
the global oil transportation sector. ✦ China Go to War Over Oil?” Far Eastern Maritime China, October 2004, pp.
Economic Review, April 2006, Vol. 169, 24-25.
References Issue 3, p. 38. 26. Dirks, Gary, “Energy Secu-
1. Enyan, Qiao, “Petroleum Enter- 14. “Why Doesn’t China have a Na- rity: China and the World,” Speech at
prises and Their Use in National Oil tional Oil Tanker Fleet?” Water Transpor- International Symposium on Energy
Security Strategy,” Modern Chemical tation Digest: Shipping Survey, Septem- Security: China and the World,” Beijing,
Industry, July 2005, pp. 9-12. ber 2005, pp. 24-25. China, May 24, 2006.
2. Ping, Luo, “National Oil, Nation- 15. Zuobin, Shang, “A Study of Oil 27. Daojiong, Zha, “Sino-American
ally Hauled: China’s Energy Security Tanker Construction Project Manage- Energy Cooperation’s Effect on East
Insurance Line,” Maritime China, Feb- ment,” Master’s degree thesis, Dalian Asian Cooperation,” Foreign Policy
ruary 2005, pp. 38-40. Maritime Affairs University, Mar. 1, Comment, No. 6., 2005, pp. 34-35.
3. “Major Chinese Operator Calls for 2003.
Maritime Oil Transport Development,” 16. “Chinese Tanker Fleet Expand-
BBC, Mar. 10, 2006, Lexis-Nexis, ing,” Lloyd’s List, July 8, 2006, Inter-
(http://web.lexis-nexis.com). tanko, (http://www.intertanko.com).
4. “Understandable Expendi- 17. “China Shipbuilding Corpora- The author
Gabe Collins (gabe.collins
tures, Non-Existent Profits,” Neft- tions CSSC, CSIC, and CSTC,” Business @gmail.com) is a research
egazovaya Vertikal, No. 7, 2006, Network Switzerland, (http://www. fellow in the Strategic Research
(http://www.ngv.ru/magazin/view. osec.ch/~0xc1878d1b_0x0001b994/
__________________________ Department at the US Naval
hsql?id=3091&mid=119).
_________________ wirtschaftsdaten/branchenverbaende/
__________________________
War College in Newport, RI.
5. “China taking a firmer grip on website_china_state_shipbuilding_cor He is proficient in Russian and
__________________________
Mandarin Chinese, and his
energy transport,” Lloyd’s List Inter- poration;internal&action=buildframes.
__________________________ main focus areas are Chinese
national, Mar. 3, 2006, (http://web. action).
____ and Russian energy policies,
lexis-nexis.com).
___________ 18. “China Urged to Beef up Ocean shipbuilding, and Chinese naval modernization.
6. Xiao, Qin, “China’s Energy Secu- Oil Shipping,” Asia Pulse, Mar. 15, A native West Texan, Collins is a 2005 honors
rity Strategy and the Energy Transport 2006, Lexis-Nexis, (http://web.lexis- graduate of Princeton University with a BA in
____________
politics.
nexis.com).
_______
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
GE N E R A L I N T E R E S T
Landrieu did not respond directly, tors to move away from their Atlantic members said Senate negotiators have
but her communications director Adam drilling strategy and toward the Gulf agreed that a bill must contain a provi-
Sharp said Vitter was entitled to his Coast approach already embraced by the sion to recover Gulf of Mexico deepwa-
opinion “but the people of Louisiana Senate and the president.” ter royalties which were not collected
know that Sen. Landrieu’s voice has She said she would continue to because price thresholds were not in-
been strong and effective in fighting for work with Domenici, Majority Leader cluded in leases issued during 1998 and
Louisiana’s coast.” William H. Frist (R-Tenn.), Minority 1999, and to use part of those revenues
In a separate statement on Sept. Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Sens. to help Gulf Coast states recover from
29, Landrieu said she hoped S. 3711’s Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and Mel Martinez 2005 hurricane damage.
focused approach on OCS Lease Sale (R-Fla.) to achieve a compromise with “Finally, the Senate has acknowl-
181 acreage, which President George the House when Congress returns on edged the need to expand and diversify
W. Bush withdrew during his first term, Nov. 13. America’s energy infrastructure beyond
and adjacent deepwater tracts farther But Pombo and the five other House the Gulf of Mexico,” the six House
south “will motivate House negotia- members said. ✦
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
power systems ebbed and flowed dur- take these tasks, Bowen said. Congress by the departments of State
ing that time period, Bowen said. Iraq’s One way for the US government to and Defense contain only general
oil, electricity, and defense ministries do this is to focus congressional atten- descriptions of progress in Iraq instead
combine to protect the systems and tion on what Iraq’s new government of specific information on actions
have varying capabilities, he said. needs to do to protect and improve the that Iraq’s government should take to
Security, however, is only one factor country’s energy infrastructure, he sug- enhance energy infrastructure integrity
in Iraq’s protection of its energy infra- gested. and progress it is making in those ac-
structure, Bowen maintained. Bowen said that current reports to tions. ✦
“While much attention has been
focused on insurgent attacks, it must be
recognized that even if attacks ceased,
other factors, such as criminal activ-
ity and the effect of aging and poorly
maintained infrastructure on operating
capability, would continue to affect oil
exports and the availability of electric-
ity,” he said.
He noted that Iraq’s oil exports
remained below established targets and
electric power generation was far below
demand when there were few insurgent
attacks from late April to early June of
this year.
“Further, once damage or disrup-
tions occur, it is critical that it be
repaired quickly, but more needs to be
done to enhance rapid repair capabil-
ity,” Bowen said.
Progress made
Bowen said the US government has
done much over the past year to help
make the Iraqi infrastructure security
forces more capable, as well as devel-
oping initiatives both to protect the
country’s energy infrastructure and to
facilitate transition of that responsibility
to Iraq’s government.
“The Iraqi government has much
to do if it is to implement US propos-
als as well as proposals put forth by its
ministries. Progress in acting on them
has been slow, in part due to the lack
of a permanent government and in part
[due] to the limited initiative of some
Iraqi ministries. Now that there is a
permanent government in place, it must
take bold action,” Bowen said.
He said Iraq’s new government is
pursuing energy improvement initia-
tives, including steps to increase the
country’s oil exports. “The challenge
for the United States is to help the Iraqi ____________
government move forward” to under-
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
WA T CH I N G T H E WORLD
Eric Watkins, Senior Correspondent
Lawmakers urge
Nigerian oil
MMS to aggressively
in jeopardy
recover royalties
Nick Snow
Washington Correspondent
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
EX P L O R A T I O N & DEVE L O P M E N T
Newfield Exploration Co., Hous- Woodford play in 2006 and up to 155
ton, signed a 15-year agreement with horizontal wells in 2007.
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, Denver, “By the end of 2009, we expect our
to construct and operate gas gather- gross Woodford shale production to
ing pipelines and related facilities for increase from a current rate of about
development of Newfield’s Devonian 65 MMcfd to more than 350 MMcfd,”
Woodford shale play in the Arkoma said Lee K. Boothby, president of the
basin of southeastern Oklahoma. subsidiary Newfield Mid-Continent Inc.
MarkWest plans to invest $175 mil- in Tulsa.
lion by yearend 2007 and $350 million The wells Newfield has drilled so far
over the next 4 years to build a gather- were located
ing infrastructure, including compres- to define the
sion, dehydration, and treating, over
200 sq miles in a four-county region.
Woodford
shale re- Oklahoma Woodford gathering
The system will include more than 400 source. The
miles of large diameter pipeline and
100,000 hp of compression for a take- gathering
low-pressure designed at 500+ MMcfd
away capacity exceeding 500 MMcfd. system will
The agreement includes a renewal fully support Newfield’s drilling efforts
option at the end
of the agreement
period. N EWFIELD’S ARKOMA WOODFORD ACREAGE Fig. 1
Newfield has
drilled more than Newfield
Oklahoma
100 vertical wells acreage
Area
and 30 horizon- Horizontal shown
tal wells in the well to date
Woodford shale. in 2006 Hughes sin
ba
Late last year, Pittsburg
a
Newfield shifted kom
Ar
its drilling pro-
McAlester
gram to horizon-
tal wells, which
increased initial
Coal
production rates
and the expected
estimated ulti- Atoka
mate recovery. Its
five most recent
wells averaged 0 Miles 20
initial production
0 Km 32
of 3.7 MMcfd/ Source: Modified after Newfield Exploration Co.
well. Company
officials expect
the average Woodford horizontal well to over its entire operating position in the
gross 2.9 bcf of gas. Woodford shale.
Still acquiring acreage, the company The company’s western Arkoma ex-
has an interest in more than 350,000 ploration program is also aimed at gas
gross lease acres (more than 125,000 in the Pennsylvanian Wapanucka and
net acres). Newfield expects to increase Cromwell, Mississippian Caney shale,
its drilling program to 13 rigs by year- and Siluro-Devonian Hunton forma-
end from 6 in late September and to as tions. ✦
many as 20 rigs by the end of 2007. It
plans to spud 60 horizontal wells in the
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
EX P L O R A T I O N & DEVE L O P M E N T
The company gave back the south-
Gas focus in Brazilian licensing draws fire western 30% of the block at the end
of 2004 and must relinquish all other
Peter Howard Wertheim Those basins are among seven in parts of the block on which it has made
OGJ correspondent which the eighth round on Nov. 28 no discoveries at the end of 2006.
will offer a total of 284 blocks covering Further appraisal starting in 2007
A new emphasis on natural gas in 101,000 sq km. Reports about the area will aim to secure the next commercial-
Brazilian exploration and production to be offered have varied (OGJ, Aug. 7, ization stage following MLE.
licensing drew criticism during a Rio 2006, Newsletter). Meanwhile, the company drilled,
Oil & Gas panel discussion in Rio de Brazil imports about half the gas it cased, and tested the Zemlet er Rakeb-1
Janeiro. uses from Bolivia, where President Evo exploration well in the northwest part
Paulo Manuel Mendes de Mendonca, Morales on May 1 announced plans to of the block earlier this year. It gauged
executive manager of exploration for take over his country’s oil and gas fields. hydrocarbons at rates sufficient to sup-
Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras), com- Petrobras has been Bolivia’s most active port drilling ZER-2 at 4.3 km south-
plained that Brazil’s eighth licensing foreign producer (OGJ, Aug. 28, 2006, west.
round focuses on gas-prone areas and p. 25). GSM-1 near the south end of the
excludes the Campos basin, which ac- Oil industry officials attending the block also tested hydrocarbons and is to
counts for 84% of Brazilian oil produc- panel discussion expressed surprise that be followed by GSME-1. ✦
tion. He also mentioned limits on the the independent ANP, in the words of
number of bids individual companies one executive, “now dances to the tune
can make. of the federal government.”
He directed his comments to Har- On a separate issue, Joao Carlos de
oldo Lima, general manager of the Luca, president of the Brazilian Petro- China
National Oil, Natural Gas, and Biofuel leum and Gas Institute (IBP), called for
Agency (ANP). quickened environmental licensing of Verona Development Corp., Vancou-
“We are following governmental Brazilian oil and gas projects and more ver, BC, is drilling two wells to assess
guidelines,” Lima responded. “After the resources for the ANP. coalbed methane potential south of
nationalization of Bolivia’s oil and gas Alvaro Teixeira, IBP executive-secre- Liulin on the 1,015 sq km Shilou North
reserves, the [Brazilian] government tary, predicted that oil and gas invest- Block in the eastern Ordos basin in
decided to give priority to E&P in gas- ments in Brazil during the next 5 years Shanxi Province.
prone provinces like Santos and Espirito will total $100 billion and sustain oil The two wells, to be cored through
Santo basins.” self-sufficiency, achieved in May. ✦ the entire gas-bearing coal sequence,
target coal seams of the Late Carbonifer-
ous Taiyuan and Early Permian Shanxi
Algeria’s Berkine basin gets new area of promise formations.
Verona also holds the 2,650 sq km
A new core area for future appraisal years. Current mapping indicates it cov- Zhengzhou Block, which includes
and potential development is emerging ers more than 85 sq km. the 600 sq km Yinggong coal field, in
in the central part of Menzel Ledjmet The deepest Devonian reservoir Henan Province. The company plans to
Block 405b in eastern Algeria’s Berkine (Siegenian) is at 4,500 m, and reserve earn 60% interest in each block.
basin, said operator First Calgary Petro- potential exists in the deeper Gedinnian
leums Ltd., Calgary. (lowermost Devonian) formation. Colombia
On the block’s east side, First Calgary Since shooting 600 sq km of 3D
looks for Sonatrach to issue an exploita- seismic west of MLE field in 2003, The government awarded Emerald
tion license in late 2006 for giant MLE First Calgary has drilled five explora- Energy PLC, London, the 365 sq km
gas-condensate field. MLE, with gross tion wells and an appraisal well: LEC-1, Maranta exploration and production
probable and possible reserves of 6.6 tcf MZLN-1, MZLS-1, LES-1, LES-2, and contract northeast of producing oil
and 903 million bbl in Lower Devonian LEW-1. All were successful in multiple fields in the Putumayo basin.
to Triassic pays at the end of 2005, is to geological horizons in what the compa- The 18-month first exploration
start producing in 2009. ny calls its Central Area Field Complex. period calls for gathering 30 km of 2D
MLE, which First Calgary has ap- LES-6 and LEC-2 are to be drilled seismic data and reprocessing 40 km
praised since obtaining the 1,104-sq- by the end of 2006, completing the of existing 2D data. A second period, at
km block in 2001, is one of the largest drilling of all of the block’s attractive Emerald’s option, calls for drilling one
gas discoveries in the country in recent exploration targets, First Calgary said. well to 11,000 ft.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
R E C E N T LY O N
Editor’s Perspective
Update The US Congress deserves credit for its concern about Additional
From
those federal offshore oil and gas leases that lack price
thresholds for deepwater royalty relief.
Online Services
OGJ Online Oil & Gas Journal
Current Issue
For subscribers
Online News from OGJ’s Award-Winning Editorial Team
• Sakhalin-2 project faces more authorization woes
• France field development brisk; exploration slow
• US drilling declines)
• BASF-Sinopec JV to expand Verbund capacity Searchable Archives For subscribers
• Petrovietnam lets EPC contract for gas pipeline Industry Statistics For subscribers
Reports & Surveys For subscribers
Exclusive Electric Power News Wire Service News
Exclusive Online Features For subscribers Online Research Center
Oil, Gas & Petrochem Equipment
Market Journal
Product Guide
October gas contract ends near 4-year low OGJ Online This Week
The Editor’s Perspective Global Energy Report
Where’s the money worry in US bans on OCS leasing?
News material appearing in
the past on OGJ Online, and
Advertiser Directory articles from back issues of Oil
& Gas Journal and Offshore, can
Banner Advertisers be found through keyword search
Baker Hughes — www.bakerhughes.com in the Searchable Archives avail-
Bupa — www.bupa-intl.com able to subscribers.
Cosco — www.gastar.com
Cooper
Cameron Cameron — www.coopercameron.com
— www.c-a-m.com
Ernst & Young — www.ey.com
Gastar — www.gastar.com
Gwiz Systems — www.bolosystems.com
Halliburton — www.halliburton.com
To subscribe
Hewlett Packard — www.hp.com Subscribe to Oil & Gas Journal and
Hughes Christensen — www.bakerhughes.com gain access to the subscription areas of
www.luftansa.com
Lufthansa — www.lufthansa.com
Petrocom — www.petrocomisalwayson.com
OGJ Online. Visit www.ogjonline.
Schlumberger — www.slb.com com/subscribe.html today.
SGI/HP — www.sgi.com
Shell — www.shell.com Oil & Gas Journal print subscribers
Spatial Data Tech — www.spatialdatatech.com can request an OGJ Online password
Vallourec — www.vamservices.com
www.vamserives.com by email. Send the 12-digit subscriber
Veolia/Compagnie — http://oilandgas.veoliawater.com number on your mailing label to
Welcom — www.welcom.com [email protected]
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
EX P L O R A T I O N & DEVE L O P M E N T
France block. Fewer than 25 wells have been from EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) in the
drilled in the entire Sandakan basin (see Piceance basin, target the Cameo coal
Europa Oil & Gas (Holdings) PLC, map, OGJ, May 10, 1993, p. 43). and Williams Fork sandstones of the
London, expects to be awarded the Cretaceous Mesaverde Group at 8,100
Bearn des Gaves exploration permit in Poland ft.
the Aquitaine basin in early 2007 fol- White River Dome field has 100
lowing government approval. FX Energy Inc., Salt Lake City, started active wells averaging a combined 11
The permit covers 928 sq km west gas production from the Wilga-2 well MMcfd and has recovered 65 bcf from
of Lacq and Meillon gas fields. Europa 25 miles southeast of Warsaw. 157 wells.
plans to probe a possible western exten- For several weeks the company plans Eden and Starlight may elect to drill
sion of the Lacq play and also sees oil to vary the producing zones and flow as many as 68 other locations, earning
potential on the northern part of the rates. The well has three pay zones of interests as they go, extending unit life.
permit. Carboniferous age at 7,732-8,550 ft. FX The typical well starts at 710 Mcfd, 25%
Energy is operator with 82% interest in carbon dioxide, and recovers 1.07 bcf
Peru the well and 250,000-acre concession. in 17 years.
A unit of Polish Oil & Gas Co. owns the
BPZ Energy Inc., Houston, spudded other 18%. Montana
the first well from the Corvina platform Wilga-2 is FX Energy’s second well
on Block Z-1 in the Pacific Ocean off to go on production in Poland, the Native American Energy Group.,
northwestern Peru. Kleka-11 well having started flowing Forest Hills, NY, is attempting to restore
The well is projected to TD of gas in early 2001. production at idle oil wells in Richey
10,114 ft in 30-40 days. The company plans to start gas out- field in the Williston basin.
Previously penetrated by several put from the Zaniemysl-3 well within Shell Oil Co. discovered Richey field
wells but never produced, Corvina field weeks and to spud the Winna Gora ex- in 1951 and drilled 10 producing wells
is estimated to have 4 tcf of gas in place. ploratory well on a 2D seismic prospect in Dawson and McCone counties. Suc-
The company secured all environ- in the Sroda area west of Warsaw within cessor independent operators struggled
mental permits required to develop the 2 weeks. with paraffin accumulation problems
Corvina gas-to-power project. The per- and eventually abandoned the field in
mits cover the 10-mile gas pipeline to Yemen 1995.
shore, onshore gas processing facilities, NAEG acquired the Beery oil lease
and a 160-Mw thermal power plant to Yemen Mayfair Petroleum Corp. and will rework the wells using the
be built at the coastal village of Nueva plans to spud the Fatima-1 exploration company’s proprietary chemical called
Esperanza. well on Block 22 in western Yemen in Petro-Flo, which it said was success-
mid-October, said participant Oracle ful in revitalizing the Tribal 7-A and
Philippines Energy Corp., Vancouver, BC. Cox 7-1 wells on the Fort Peck Indian
Projected TD is 2,250 m to target the Reservation.
Tap Oil Ltd., Perth, has taken 85% Middle Miocene that tested 42° grav-
equity in the SC-41 exploration block ity paraffinic crude oil and dry gas in Washington
in Philippines waters off northeastern Jaizan basin wells to the north in south-
Borneo. western Saudi Arabia in the early 1990s. Exxel Energy Corp., Vancouver, BC,
The 2006-07 work program calls for Oracle Energy holds 15% participat- said its US subsidiary boosted its min-
gathering of more than 300 sq km of ing interest in Block 22 covering 8,151 eral rights in the Columbia River basin
3D seismic data on the block, in 800- sq km in the Tihama basin. to 325,000 net acres.
1,200 m of water in the Sulu Sea. The interests are undeveloped, and
Unocal Corp. identified a deepwater Colorado Exxel Energy (USA) Inc.’s working in-
petroleum system in 2000 when it re- terest is 100%.
covered oil from Wildebeest-1, the only Eden Energy Corp., Vancouver, BC, The subsidiary is acquiring more
well drilled in the deepwater fold belt. and Starlight Oil & Gas LLC, private acreage and reviewing its options
The fold belt is strewn with structural Colorado independent, are drilling the for development. The area appears to
and structural/stratigraphic leads. first of two development wells on the contain an emerging basin-centered gas
Tap Oil has three Philippine partners 20,000-acre Ant Hill Unit in White play, and several operators have ob-
and plans to reduce its interest in the River Dome field in 2n-96w and 97w tained drilling permits for new wells.
in north-central Rio Blanco County.
The wells, on a farmout to Starlight
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
DR I L L I N G & PR O D U C T I O N
Three projects pro- the reservoir management strategy by
gressively modified gas reducing the reservoir pressure to 70
compression on the bara from 380 bara, liberating an incre-
UK Brent field to lower mental 58 million cu m of oil equiva-
suction pressures in-line lent production.
with late life reservoir Production The LTFD project involved the instal-
and production require- lation of an integrated two-stage separa-
ments for depressurizing tion, gas compression, and dehydration
the field. process module on three platforms
The long-term field development (Bravo, Charlie, and Delta) to enable
(LTFD) project laid the foundations for reservoir depres-
depressurizing Brent field, while the surization.1
two-step low-pressure operation (LPO)
and low-pressure operation plus (LPOP) Compressor Optimum compressor choice
compressor upgrade minimized risk
and lifecycle cost.
Each new compressor design lever-
selection
The need for a
large gas com-
boosts Brent gas production
aged proved technology of its time so pression capac-
as not to jeopardize machine reliabil- ity within limited weight and space
ity and gas availability. The technical constraints drove the equipment selec-
innovations incorporated in the LPOP tion. The LTFD project involved fitting Thomas N. Schneider
compressor extended the operational each platform with a single gas-export Shell Exploration & Production
envelope beyond that thought possible compression train, which required an Aberdeen
at LTFD. aero-derivative gas-turbine driver to al- Riccardo Brogelli
Advances in modeling techniques low rapid turbine replacements during GE Oil & Gas
and design verification provided the maintenance. Florence, Italy
confidence to install the LPO and LPOP The project selected Cooper-Rolls’
machines without an onshore string RB-211/6562 gas turbines as the prime
test. mover with GE Oil & Gas gas compres-
sors.
Brent field A single-helical gearbox coupled the
Brent field has been a cornerstone two stage, back-to-back compressor to
of the UK offshore oil and gas industry the driver. The gas turbine and gearbox
since its discovery in 1971, about 500 shared the compressor lube oil system
km northeast of Aberdeen. The coven- while the compressor was fitted with
turers, Shell UK Ltd. and Esso Explora- tandem dry gas seals.
tion and Production UK Ltd., installed Gas export availability was a key val-
four platforms (Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, ue driver for the project. This required
and Delta) to develop the field with an a proven, reliable, and readily maintain-
estimated 600
million cu m of
oil equivalent BRENT GAS EXPORT COMPRESSOR COMPARISON Table 1
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
DR I L L I N G & PR O D U C T I O N
able high-flow compressor. GE designed C OMPRESSOR COMPARISON Fig. 1
seal design techniques that enabled
a compressor rotor with a 600-mm 20 detailed evaluation of the behavior of
diameter, two-dimensional impellers in such a compressor.
a three wheels and stage configuration The upgrade required significant
Compression ratio
15
(Table 1 and Fig. 1). LPOP
brownfield work and an extended shut-
The vertically split barrel-type casing down to remove the original machine
allows the replacement of the bundle 10 and install and align the new one. The
without removal of the process pipe project also replaced piping spools,
work. LPO valves, and gear internals.
5
Several factors made the LTFD com- LTFD It also included a review of the com-
pressor design difficult, considering the Molecular weight: 21.1 kg/1,000 mol plete topsides process for flow, pressure,
Suction temperature: 30° C.
Limited to maximum 27 Mw power
experience and methods available in the 0 and temperature changes resulting from
5 10 15 20 25
early 1990s. The compressor was speci- First-stage suction flow, million actual cu m/day the new operating conditions.
fied in accordance with NACE,2 because Increased compressor discharge tem-
of the risk for the reservoir to sour in peratures affected pipe class and valve
later field life. The need to deliver high enhances well performance and reduces specifications as well as piping and
flow and polytropic head in a single the ultimate reservoir pressure, which equipment stress levels. Although the
casing resulted in the impeller tip veloc- in turn increases gas recovery. heat load on the gas coolers remained
ity being relatively high. Options evaluated to reduce back- essentially unchanged (given no change
As a consequence, the impeller had pressure while maintaining export to compressor driver power), these
high stresses and, therefore, the materi- pipeline pressure included multiphase required re-rating for the increased
als selected needed sufficient strength to pumps and various suction and dis- temperatures.
sustain the stresses but also to have low charge booster compressor configura- Lower pressure affected fuel gas, gas
enough hardness to satisfy the NACE tions. All these concepts were unat- dehydration, and off-gas compression
requirement. The presence of carbon tractive economically due to space, systems, which were then either modi-
dioxide and water further complicated weight, power, and flow assurance. The fied or operated differently.
material selection. most cost-effective approach was the
The design used rotor-dynamic modification of the existing gas export Rewheeled compressor
analysis that accounted for the destabi- compression train on each platform for Optimizing the impeller geom-
lizing flow effects in the labyrinth seals. a lower suction pressure by upgrad- etry and increasing rotational speed
This was important particularly in the ing the compressor, retaining the gas increased the polytropic head of the
area of the center balance drum that turbine driver, and reusing the base skid LPO compressor when compared with
separates the discharge volutes of the and auxiliaries. the LTFD design (Table 1). The rotor
two compression stages. The compressor upgrade reduced line-up was again composed of two-di-
All three units underwent full-load suction pressure and reduced mass flow mensional impellers in three plus three
testing in the factory using the con- in two phases to match the produc- configuration (Table 1).
tract drivers. The testing and in service tion decline of each platform. The work The length constraint of the existing
encountered no stability problems. staggered the shutdowns and aligned it casing prevented the accommodation
Rolls-Royce and GE staff maintained the with other in-field activities to mini- of additional impellers within the unit.
compression trains for optimal perfor- mize avoidable production deferment. The selected impellers had the high-
mance under a healthcare contract that Phase 1 included upgrading the est head geometry available within the
supported an enhanced maintenance compressor as far as possible within the GE range of impeller families and an
program. existing casing design. The LPO project increased 630-mm diameter, the largest
None of the three compressors re- replaced the compressor bundle and for the casing size.
quired a major unplanned intervention gear internals. This well-proven upgrade The impeller tip speed together with
in more than 20 years of cumulative method only required a short platform the NACE requirement resulted in the
run life. shutdown. LPO bundle being the limit state design
Phase 2 included the LPOP project of the time.
Development options that replaced the existing compressor In the absence of a gas-turbine skid,
As the gas reservoirs depleted, well with a new longer casing to accommo- compressor, or gearbox casing, it was
productivity declined below the design date additional impellers. This option not possible to factory test the new
flow rate of the compressor. Optimiz- only became feasible in recent years be- compressor or gearbox internals. The
ing production required lowering well cause of advances in rotor and labyrinth project mitigated start-up risk through
back-pressure. Lower back-pressure design verification, use of proven im-
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
www.tenaris.com/usa
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
DR I L L I N G & PR O D U C T I O N
ferential pressure
K IRK-DONALD PLOT Fig. 2
across the inter-
stage diaphragm.
3.0 2BCL508/A
LPOP 2005
Diaphragm
deformation in the
Warning 2BCL506/A
LPO 2002
area of the balance
2.5
drum seal had
MCS/NC1
2BCL506/A to be minimized
LTFD 1993
because excessive
2.0
movement would
be detrimental for
rotor stability.
1.5
The design
minimized the
Stable axial length of the
1.0
10 102 103 MCS/NC1 104 105 10 new compressor
6
Note: MCS - Maximum continuous speed, NC1 - First critical speed, Pd - Pressure discharge, Ps - Pressure suction to prevent rotor
stability prob-
lems. The use of
peller designs, GE quality control (high- requirements while ensuring a safe and computational fluid dynamics models
speed verification and balancing of the reliable compressor with a high level of optimized within the space constraints
rotor), and commissioning procedures. performance. Initial efforts focused on the aerodynamic design of the two inlet
Offshore testing showed a good meeting the constraints. volutes.
match with the predicted performance. A reduction in the wall thickness of
The modification activities were com- the second-stage suction was the main LPOP compressor rotor
pleted within the planned shutdown change that reduced the weight, and The design had to resolve rotor-
durations and all three rewheeled finite element analysis, verified in a dynamic stability concerns because of
compressors were as reliable in service hydraulic test, validated the various load the bearing span, rotational speed, and
as the LTFD units. conditions on the casing. polytropic head capacity of the LPOP
The addition of impeller stages machine. A comparison of the com-
LPOP compressor (four plus four vs. three plus three) pressor design against GE’s historical
The key objectives of the LPOP com- and increased shaft speed (Table 1) was database shows the importance of these
pressor design were: the only way to increase the polytropic concerns (Fig. 2). All Brent machines
1. Maximizing the polytropic head head. are within GE’s warning zone in the
(minimize suction pressure). The increased gear ratio pushed the Kirk-Donald plot,3 however, the LPOP
2. Having a wide operating range pitch-line velocity and loading of the compressor is close to the stability limit.
(high start-up pressure required for fuel gear teeth to the maximum allowed A design optimization and verifica-
gas). by Shell. GE selected a special material tion was required to avoid an unstable
3. Using materials suitable for sour known as Virgo 38 for the impellers design. The analysis was conducted in
service. to maximize resistance to sulfide stress parallel with a third party, the South
Constraints included: corrosion cracking while achieving West Research Institute.
1. Maintaining casing diameter and the required strength. The use of finite
reusing the existing compressor base element analysis optimized the impeller Undamped critical speed
plate. interference fit geometry. The starting point for the rotor-dy-
2. Having a casing weight of less The compressor’s wide operating namic verification was an undamped
than 18 tonnes (vs. 21.5 tonnes stan- range caused the residual axial thrust critical speed analysis (UCSA) per API
dard weight). due to the pressure distribution over 617 during the compressor feasibility
3. Sustaining nozzle loads up to 5- the rotor to have much greater variation design study.4 The first equivalent shaft
times NEMA. and higher peak values than in standard was the result of a simple evolution of
4. Maintaining the size and location GE applications. the previous (LPO) machine. Modifi-
of the discharge nozzles. Numerous evaluations optimized the cations of the scheme followed as the
GE studied all aspects of the com- balance drum design. Constraint 4 lim- design proceeded to determine the final
pressor design to find the best com- its the interstage wall thickness while optimized shaft.
promise between the conflicting Objectives 1 and 2 increase the dif- UCSA considers bearing character-
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
istics purely in
terms of stiffness
B RENT LPOP LOG DECREMENT Fig. 3
1
coefficients cal- Divergent Convergent
culated with two
different tools: an 0
internal GE tool
–0.120 –0.080 –0.040 0.000 0.040 0.080 0.120 0.160 0.200
that has correlated
tolerance = –0.02 mm
well over many
Maximum taper
years with GE
Log decrement
–1
standard bearings,
= –0.02 mm
Hot taper
and XLTRC2 from
Texas A&M Uni-
versity.5 The two –2
sets of calculations
provided a good
match. The UCSA
led to three deci-
B RENT LPOP INTERSTAGE DIAPHRAGM Fig. 4
Second-stage discharge
First-stage discharge
Honeycomb seal
Balance drum
Balance drum
sions: Honeycomb
1. Increasing
Radial displacement, mm
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
DR I L L I N G & PR O D U C T I O N
LPOP construction
B RENT LPOP INTERSTAGE DIAPHRAGM SEAL Fig. 5
The design constraints imposed
on GE limited changes to and maxi-
Impeller eye mized the reuse of existing equipment.
labyrinths with
swirl breaks
Detailed design checks of the installed
equipment for the new process condi-
tions confirmed that no major equip-
Second-stage ment modifications were required
discharge
external to the compressor. The brown-
field implementation, however, posed
its own challenges.
Interstage The platform cranes had to do all
honeycomb with the lifts to avoid reliance on a lift
shunt holes
vessel. Considering crane radii and dy-
namic factors, this limited the weight
First-stage of a ship-to-platform lift to 18 tonnes
discharge
and of a platform inboard lift to 35
tonnes.
The compressors were therefore dis-
primary analysis at MCS/MPR (maxi- predicts the appropriate behavior and mantled after shop testing and packaged
mum continuous speed/maximum has been validated experimentally in the into custom containers for transport.
pressure ratio) provided a check analy- turbomachinery laboratory test rig.9 A frame with an integral gantry crane
sis at the MCS-choke condition. The The tapered honeycomb seal is provided a self-contained environment
manufacturer, client, and third party sensitive to the difference in clearance for offshore compressor reassembly
agreed to the following seal configura- between the seal inlet and outlet. The prior to the shutdown. The assembly
tion: design used a seal taper of 0.1 mm be- frame replicated the compressor base-
• Impeller eye seals—toothed laby- cause this value is well centered in the plate supports, thereby allowing the use
rinths with nominal clearance. stable region of the log decrement vs. of the contracted special tooling.
• Final balance drum seal—abrad- seal-taper plot (Fig. 3). Because no offshore hot-work
able seal with teeth on rotor. A finite element analysis that consid- (welding) was allowed, the installation
• Interstage balance drum seal—ta- ered thermal, centrifugal, and pres- required prefabricating all piping spools
pered honeycomb. sure effects determined the interstage to exact dimensions. A 3D model of the
The interstage balance drum seal diaphragm deformation, including the new compressor within the module was
near the center of the rotor is criti- honeycomb seal and the balance drum developed based on an offshore laser
cal for rotor stability and generally the (Fig. 4). The definitive honeycomb seal scan survey of the existing configura-
most important source of damping in machining (cold) ensured that the hon- tion as well as a survey of the connec-
this type of back-to-back compressor.8 eycomb seal assumes the correct taper tion points on the new compressor. The
A tapered honeycomb design for under working (hot) conditions. work paid particular attention to the
the LPOP machine guaranteed rotor The analysis at this point showed relative location of the spool termina-
stability. The LTFD and LPO machines that the compressor was stable theoreti- tion flanges, flange angles, and bolt hole
had a stepped toothed labyrinth (Table cally across the full operating range. The orientations.
1). Moreover, to reduce the pre-swirl of design, however, further incorporated Mechanical handling aids facilitated
gas entering the honeycomb, the design a stability margin in the form of swirl a safe installation (Fig. 6). The point-
incorporated shunt holes in the inter- brakes on the inlet of each impeller eye cloud data from the offshore laser scan
stage diaphragm. labyrinth (Fig. 5). A third party (SWRI) survey provided a way to clash check
The tapered honeycomb design calculated that the swirl brakes increase and optimize the compressor installa-
needs correct modeling to avoid in- the log decrement by 0.13 at MCS/ tion path and temporary fixtures. The
stability. Given particular conditions, a MPR. lift of the compressor went above the
divergent honeycomb seal can exhibit PTC 10 Type 2 testing of the final existing skid supports before the unit
strong negative stiffness, especially at compressor with and without swirl was moved off the skid and lowered
low frequency. breaks showed that the swirl brakes also onto the adjoining walkway.
Effective damping also can turn had a positive effect on thermodynamic After removal of the compressor
negative at low frequency. The ISOT- performance.10 piping spools, the work included con-
SEAL code used for the analysis closely struction of a temporary gantry within
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
the module.
Fail-safe pneu- B RENT LPOP COMPRESSOR MECHANICAL HANDLING Fig. 6
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
DR I L L I N G & PR O D U C T I O N
The new automated and self-elevating Rocket Rig (photo above) was unveiled
in Oklahoma in September (Fig. 1; Ann Sherman Photography, provided by
Cactus Drilling Co. LLC).The bull line attached to the hydraulic raising
system (photo on right) is used to erect the Rocket Rig (Fig. 2; Ann Sherman
Photography, provided by Cactus Drilling Co. LLC).
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
PR O C E S S I N G
Recent industry workshops have gas asset owners, PCS and security ven-
identified the issues of cyber and dors, PCS researchers, and government
physical security risks to process control officials—to explore the underlying
systems (PCS). There are many cyber security issues and discuss mitigation
and physical security risks to the oil strategies.
and gas infrastructure, and it is gener- These events occurred in June
ally recognized that even a small process 2005 in Houston, and in June 2006
disruption could produce many serious in La Jolla, Calif. Research and analysis
consequences that result in safety, envi- performed by I3P were presented and
ronmental, and economic impacts. interaction facilitated with industry
This article focusesthrough discussions about PCS security
on the characteriza- concerns, cyber risks for automation
Workshops identify threats tion of the cyber
risks associated with
systems, emerging threats, and new
technologies.
Report
defenses. Understand-
ing and characterizing
this risk will enable the
development of strategies
for preventing, detecting,
Process Control mitigating, and recover-
Technology ing from cyber-security
incidents with focused
and defined objectives.
Input from industry
collectively provides a
strong basis for both
decision-making and im-
provements with realiz-
has led to the increased awareness of able, specific outcomes.
PCS security and protection.
To address PCS risks, the Institute for Critical industry observations
Information Infrastructure Protection Input for the risk-characterization
(I3P) has funded a multi-year research process was obtained primarily from
program to improve PCS security in industry stakeholders through work-
the oil and gas industry (see www.
____ shops and interaction, gap analyses per-
thei3p.org/research/scada for more formed under I3P activities, and related
information on this project). Under this PCS research. The first I3P workshop
program, I3P hosted two PCS security gathered a wealth of industry perspec-
workshops—which included oil and tive. The second I3P workshop validated
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Industry concerns
Members of industry segments
voiced their concerns at panels dur-
ing the workshops. These concerns can
be grouped into different technical
domains: DISCUSSION PANEL CONCERNS Table 1
• Wireless security. Security is lack- Operator panel highlights Vendor panel highlights Shared, common concerns
ing in wireless connectivity and remote Comprehensive security across Management must be en- Securing wireless capabilities
access to enterprise systems. Wireless spectrum of control systems gaged early in decisions about as part of the network’s overall
is needed, not just patches or obtaining and implementing security plan is necessary.
security must be addressed as part of rudimentary security controls security controls.
on systems.
the enterprise architecture. There is the
802.11 protocol in production fields, Interdependencies exist on Awareness and training A set of widely accepted
other critical infrastructures, amongst operators and integra- standards, guidelines, and best
but a more secure, capable solution is such as telecommunications. tors on security controls is practices would be very useful
needed. to industry in planning and
needed across the infrastructure and in implementing security across
architectures.
remote areas.
• Intrusion detection. Basic intru- There is a need for overall An industrial plant network An understanding of how
intrusion detection and preven- should be considered a multi- interoperability affects security
sion detection is often lacking in an tion. layered enterprise rather than a within the enterprise by vari-
collection of individual nodes. ous levels within an organiza-
architecture, which includes monitor- tion is necessary.
ing, event correlation, and alarms. This Facilitating an understanding of Clearly defined roles and Security should be addressed
security control is essential to detecting security needs and implement- relationships between IT by including it in the overall
ing a solution requires engag- personnel and control system control system and network
and preventing attacks. ing stakeholders at all levels of engineers are needed. lifecycle.
an organization, including asset
• Understanding and implementa- owners and managers.
tion of security. A comprehensive view Industry stakeholders in any Legacy systems will continue
and implementation of security is position must be aware that to operate in the oil and gas
the oil and gas, and na- infrastructure and must be
often missing; a piece-meal approach tional critical infrastructure as a considered when securing
whole, is considered a “target architectures.
to security is common. Currently, there of opportunity” to threats.
is sporadic or little implementation of Realization of economic
controls across the system. One layer, justification for implement-
ing security throughout the
such as a firewall or physical security, enterprise is critical.
is not enough to prevent an attack. A
layered, comprehensive approach is
necessary. approach is needed with guidelines for operations.
• Legacy systems. Many legacy sys- an enterprise approach to security. • Network structure. Many PCS are
tems that have interoperability issues or • Training and awareness. Train- connected to business networks within
hardware and software constraints are ing and awareness of security con- the enterprise. Without separation or
still in use. These systems have minimal figurations is necessary to prevent the controls placed between the archi-
security controls and are difficult to incorrect implementation of security tectures, attackers have a potentially
patch or upgrade, resulting in vulner- controls, such as firewalls. exploitable access path to gain control
abilities without clear mitigation strate- • Design. Basic security, such as au- over operations. There is greater risk,
gies and a weakening of the overall thentication, access control, and encryp- therefore, to core functions and opera-
architecture. Addressing these legacy tion, is not designed into many control tions.
systems and developing a solution for systems. The need for add-on security • Policies and plans. In addition to
protection is needed. can create implementation difficulties. guidelines and standards in the ap-
• Standards. No widely accepted Upgrades and added functionality to proach to and implementation of se-
standard for security implementation aging control systems can result in the curity, enterprise level security policies
in control systems exists. Non-standard introduction of commercial technol- and plans are needed to ensure secu-
security controls are therefore applied ogy that can add new vulnerabilities. rity is implemented at the necessary
over a variety of domains, including Considering security at the beginning levels of protection. The organizational
business systems, PCS, and physical and throughout the control system divide that exists in many organizations
(site) security. A comprehensive, layered lifecycle is critical for continual, secure between IT and PCS groups can thwart
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Threat
assessment
Creating an
understanding
Industry
Exploits a vulnerability business of threat and an
network awareness that
Insider/outsider
critical infrastruc-
ture can be an
attractive target is
generally the first
step in protecting
Open access
Indirect
critical operations.
Employee Control
threats
centers
The goal of a
threat assessment
Remote is to determine
Insider threat terminal the likelihood of
units
an attack against
a given target.
SCADA Plants
operational
Threats to control
network systems in the oil
Geographic and gas sectors can
Insider/outsider information
system be derived based
on access, intent,
and system vulner-
effective policy and procedure imple- increased communication across the abilities. A typical
mentation. stakeholder community in a multi-front threat assessment includes:
• Incident handling. Part of robust approach to security. • Identification of known and poten-
security includes data backups as well as Table 1 outlines highlights from both tial adversaries.
the preservation and analysis of forensic panel discussions. • Analysis of each adversary’s moti-
data. Developing a plan for maintaining vations, goals, and capabilities.
this data is important to understand and Risk characterization • Assessment of the threat posed by
mitigate future attacks. Characterizing risk for control sys- each adversary to critical system assets.
Interestingly, concerns from indus- tems is different than identifying risks When applied to a specific control
try members often reflect the body of purely associated with finances, safety, system or set of systems, a threat as-
industry they represent. For example, or IT. It is a blend of all those risks with sessment is normally quite detailed and
panel members at the first I3P work- their effect on operations and the ability specific.
shop were divided into operator and to perform the critical functions neces- Threats can be characterized by
vendor groups and it was interesting to sary to continuously provide a product both their level of access, motiva-
note the differences and commonalities or service, e.g., refine crude or transport tions, and their capabilities. A threat
in their responses. refined products in a pipeline. implies that an individual or group
This emphasizes the need for In this case, risk is characterized in has the ability and access to carry out a
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
The DryTree & Riser Forum was created to facilitate the open exchange of ideas, best practices, and lessons
For Event Information Contact:
learned that affect the selection and execution of deepwater drytree systems and drilling or production
Event Manager:
riser systems from floating facilities. Gail Killough
Phone: + 713 963 6251
This year’s theme, “Innovation for Changing Demand,” will present practical experiences relating to choices Fax: + 713 963 6201
when choosing drytree production systems and deepwater riser systems. During this two-day event, speakers Email: [email protected]
and delegates will explore the technology, tools, decision-making processes, and functional requirements of Exhibit and Sponsorship Sales:
the concept selection and execution employing drytrees and various riser systems. Dawn Peek
Phone: + 713 963 6213
If you are involved in drytree systems or production risers, you cannot afford to miss this exciting Fax: + 713 963 6201
Email: [email protected]
conference. For more information on attending, sponsoring or exhibiting visit our website.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
PR O C E S S I N G
targeted toward an organization or one
CHARACTERIZED VULNERABILITIES Table 2
specific goal. For example, widespread
Vulnerability category Description, examples worms and viruses can create an overall
System data Lack of understanding of what data is consid- slowdown and damage, but are gen-
ered sensitive, how it should be separated and erally not used to produce a specific
protected.
Security administration Lacking policies, standard procedures, training,
effect on one organization. Likewise,
and corporate/industry security plans. untrained employees or accidents by
Formal configuration management needed for
upgrades, legacy plans, and patching. employees can pose a threat to the
Architecture, design No integrated security in SCADA designs. organization by inadvertently creating
Security must be an add-on.
Centralized storage or control mechanisms are
security holes.
single points of failure. These indirect threats should be
Platforms Patching, backups, passwords, offsite security, considered when addressing security
application security, and security policies for
access control and file sharing are needed. in control system operations in addi-
Physical access control is lacking. tion to threats with targeted, malicious
Networks, communications Wireless security, monitoring, encryption, ac- intent.
cess control, boundary security, and standards
for implementation are all needed. Quantification of threat and under-
Incident response, handling Response plans are lacking, as well as backup standing how that threat relates to their
and disaster recovery plans. own assets can help industry members
Forensic data collection and analysis needed.
Redundant operational capability is beneficial. take the initial steps in building a se-
cure operating environment.
process that creates damage to, or ex- nesses, and protective measures, are Vulnerability analysis
ploits, a system for a specific gain. The often available on the Internet. Likewise, A vulnerability is a weakness that ex-
result can have physical, economic, en- industry and corporate-specific data ists in a system, network, application, or
vironmental, and human consequences. can easily be gathered from basic Web process that can be exploited by a threat
Threats to control systems can come investigative techniques. to create an adverse effect. Examples of
from both insiders and outsiders and In combination, this information can vulnerabilities can include open ports,
can vary in capability. Capability is a be very useful to a threat planning a unpatched software, dated virus protec-
function of resources such as time, coordinated attack and, because this in- tion, or exploitable system services.
money, computing power, technical formation is readily available, increased Vulnerabilities can be identified
knowledge, and intelligence resources. protections implemented on networks through a frequent assessment process
Threats and their capabilities are become the primary line of defense. or review, and can be reduced using dif-
often divided into several specific This defense can ensure operations are ferent mechanisms. These mechanisms
categories such as nation-state, inter- not disrupted or compromised. can include patches, access controls,
national terrorists, domestic terrorists, Because these threats exist today and network protocols, monitoring, and
or hackers. Although individual hackers organized cyber-terrorists continue to physical controls.
may have malicious intent and technical gain resources and capabilities, indus- Vulnerabilities discussed at the I3P
knowledge, organized cyber-terror- try must address this as a present and workshops include descriptions of
ist groups often possess the resources future issue. broad categories as well as specific
necessary to carry out an effective, Fig. 2 illustrates an attack and lists examples. Table 2 outlines these catego-
distributed attack that produces severe its potential effects, which include ries.
consequences. downtime, exploited information for Understanding vulnerabilities and
Characteristics that can affect a financial gain, strained strategic part- how they exist and evolve within an
threat’s success in an attack include nerships, safety hazards, and damage to architecture is necessary when select-
funding, goal intensity, stealth capabil- infrastructure. ing and applying security protective
ity, access, cyber skills, implementation For example, once a threat ac- measures. As a whole, the oil and gas
time, and cyber-organization size. cesses a control system, often through industry is becoming more aware of
A targeted organization has no a business system, it is possible for the vulnerabilities and how they arise, and
capability of controlling these charac- attacker to assume privileges as though are now looking for ways to mitigate
teristics, with the exception of access. he or she were a trusted insider. This them.
An organization’s physical and cyber control could potentially result in ac- Vulnerabilities can be identified and
defenses are therefore critical. cess of control systems that manage the reduced, but continual maintenance is
Access to information about control lifeblood of an organization. required to safeguard elements of the
systems, including design details, weak- In some instances, threats are not architecture and operations as a whole.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Vulnerability assessments are particu- in repercussions to system operations, insurance, although the financial benefit
larly useful in determining the current which in turn inflict a greater economic to stopping attacks on a daily basis
state and robustness of an organization’s loss on a plant or company. On a larger is rarely quantifiable. An asset owner
architecture. Identified technical vulner- scale, these effects could negatively must therefore consider the potential
abilities, however, are often not mean- affect the local, regional, national, or cost of not employing these controls.
ingful to management when making possibly global economy. Downtime and the halted production or
choices to invest in security. • Social impacts or public image. A transport of oil and gas can be directly
Vulnerabilities must be viewed as side effect that is often overlooked is translated to profit losses.
only one part of a whole when consid- the consequence of losing national or To some extent, safety can also be
ering risk to control systems and the public confidence in an organization quantified in the number and cost of
organization. Different members of the or industry. It is, however, a very real accidents and injury. The social impacts,
organization, and of the industry, may objective and one that can be accom- however, such as quality of life and the
have different priorities. Awareness and plished via a cyber attack. effect on critical infrastructure at a na-
communication is required to create a • Impact on national critical infra- tional level are not easily measured.
comprehensive security plan that pri- structure. Industry sectors are a part of For example, an organization must
oritizes assets and provides guidelines the whole national infrastructure. Loss consider how customers and the market
for applying protective measures. or adjustment of capacity and delayed will view it if it suffers a publicized
purchasing and transportation create attack. Likewise, if a corporation’s
Consequences secondary effects on the national in- unsecured control system network is
A consequence is the resulting loss, frastructure. Likewise, attacks on other used as an entry point or active node
damage, or impact resulting from a industries in the national infrastructure in a coordinated attack on the national
threat successfully exploiting a vulner- can affect the oil and gas sectors. An infrastructure, it can have devastating
ability. Consequences can include access example reiterated at the workshops is business consequences in addition to
and alteration of data, disruption of the reliance on the telecommunications the infrastructure damage.
service, destruction of the system, and industry. This scenario is not unlike that of
severe environmental and public health Table 3 breaks down example conse- airline companies who have suffered a
results of an attack. quences, effects, and overall impacts. If business loss or faced near bankruptcy
Based on the threats and vulnerabili- a threat exists that can exploit an exist- due to eroding public confidence
ties discussed, consequences to control ing vulnerability, any number of these caused by a hijacking or safety-related
systems could potentially be severe consequences can occur. crash. The price of inaction can be far
due to physical and operational effects. Although Table 3 does not con- costlier than implementation of security
Some consequences can have serious tain every potential consequence, it is to the architecture.
effects on business operations, to the important to understand how a threat
industry as a whole, and to the national with an opportunity can create negative Protective measures
critical infrastructure. consequences. Understanding compo- Defenses against cyber attacks are
Understanding consequences of a nents such as the network, platforms, most effective when applied in mul-
successful attack can help an asset own- system data, and operational policies tiple layers of security through what is
er identify areas of the architecture that can help in creating a layered approach sometimes referred to as a “defense-in-
need higher levels of protection and to protecting the infrastructure. depth strategy.” Often specific controls
prioritize the deployment of protection are implemented that only partially
mechanisms. The consequences of an Business effects, ROI address protection, such as firewalls, but
attack have direct effects on the organi- Determining the consequences of an protection and defense must be viewed
zation or industry as a whole. attack based on an analysis of threats as a comprehensive task.
These effects include: and vulnerabilities is useful to under- Vulnerabilities can be mitigated and
• Physical effects that encompass standing exactly what to protect on threats deterred by using a layered ap-
direct consequences of control system control system networks. Workshop proach that groups areas of concern.
misoperations. The most devastating participants recognized, however, that These logical areas that require defense
potential effects include personal injury implementation of security controls is can include data, applications, plat-
or loss of life. Other effects include the often an expensive task. There must be a forms, networks and communications
loss of property (including data) or visible ROI to justify the expense of de- systems, and perimeter systems. Break-
damage to the environment. ploying additional security technology ing apart these layers, organizations
• Economic effects are secondary re- such as hardware, software, or physical can map their processes and determine
sults of physical impacts ensuing from controls. exactly what needs to be protected and
an attack. Physical impacts could result It is probably most analogous to how to defend it.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
PR O C E S S I N G
oil and gas industry can lead to effective
TECHNICAL EFFECTS, RESULTS Table 3 implementation of security technology
Technical consequence Effect Result
and methodologies. These implementa-
Access, read, alter data • Theft or alteration of corpo- • Economic (i.e., loss of trad-
tions will produce inherently secure
rate, industry data. ing partner, market instability, operations, ensuring reliability, continu-
• Theft or alteration of critical downtime).
operations data used for future • National critical infrastructure ity, safety, and important steps toward a
attack. (i.e., weaknesses in operations secure national infrastructure.
• Theft of personnel data. may be exploited, downtime,
• Divulge corporate trading unavailability). Implementing robust security mea-
partner information. • Quality of life (i.e., identify
• Billing and purchasing data theft, negative publicity for sures across facets of an organization
changed. corporate and industry).
• Safety issues. takes communication across all levels
Gain control of SCADA • Full operation of control • Physical effects on equip- of the organization, established objec-
systems systems. ment.
• Can alter, stop, or destroy tives, and a committed effort to ongo-
equipment and operations.
ing maintenance. Because all threats
Denial of service Halt operations on process
control, business systems, or cannot be eliminated and vulnerabilities
telecommunications. continue to evolve, a layered approach
Access systems as jump Use systems as part of a large to security and a comprehensive imple-
points scale, coordinated attack.
mentation plan is necessary.
Physical access to SCADA • Can physically damage
systems systems. Continued collaboration between
• Access as a trusted insider if
electronic access controls are industry and researchers will yield
not in place. new technologies and approaches that
Introduction of a virus, worm Can slow or halt operations. mitigate risk and foster a secure operat-
ing environment. A third I3P workshop
is planned for February 2007 that will
These defenses and protective mea- in security controls, a comprehensive include demonstrations of common
sures could include: and well-understood security plan is re- vulnerabilities and associated mitigation
• Access control. quired. This plan should address physi- tools and techniques.
• Authentication. cal, personnel, and information security, This I3P effort is coordinating with
• Applied operating system and plat- and should mandate as many controls other PCS security research programs
form security. as required to secure operations. In this and industries to develop ideas for
• Data separation. plan, it is also necessary to address the comprehensive security. These activi-
• Functional separation. technology lifecycle. ties will yield an accurate picture of the
• Network design. As operations and equipment evolve, most important issues.
• Encryption. security must be fluid and provide the
• Patches, upgrades. functionality required by the current Acknowledgments
• Monitoring and event correlation. situation. In addition to lifecycle plan- The authors thank the June 2005
• Backups and disaster recovery ning, legacy systems must be assessed I3P workshop participants for the open
plans. and a methodology developed for either discussion of security issues, which
• Alerting mechanisms to discover upgrading or replacing these systems. formed the basis of this article. The au-
coordinated attacks. In developing a plan and applying thors also recognize Martin Stoddard of
• Redundancy in connectivity. controls, forging a common under- CVO Electrical Systems, LLC, Erin Pratt
• Firewalls and perimeter security. standing among different industry and of Pacific Northwest National Labora-
• Secure remote access. organizational groups is essential. This tory, and Yacov Haimes, Matthew Henry,
• Trusted computing platforms. means creating awareness and discus- Joost Santos, and Kenneth Crowther of
• Accepted measures for risk charac- sion among all stakeholders to include the University of Virginia. ✦
terization elements. asset owners, vendors, IT personnel,
In combination, and with an opera- operators, and management. Involving Bibliography
tional focus, these measures can provide and obtaining feedback from members “Generic Threat Profiles,” Report
the best defense against attack. Under- across the enterprise can result in a se- SAND2005-5411, Sandia National
standing the critical functions and data curity plan that is most effective while Laboratories, Albuquerque.
types in the system and applying ap- ensuring continuity of operations. “A Reference Model for Control and
propriate security controls to segregated Automation Systems in Electric Power,”
architectural enclaves is essential for a Further work Report SAND2005-1000C, Sandia Na-
comprehensive defense. A growing understanding of threat, tional Laboratories, Albuquerque.
In addition to the use of technology vulnerabilities, and consequences in the “A Scalable Approach for Criti-
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
cal Infrastructure Security” Report Stamp, J., et al., “Sustainable Secu- security and the integration of network technol-
SAND2002-0877, Sandia National rity for Infrastructure SCADA,” Report ogy into security architectures for infrastructure,
Laboratories, Albuquerque. SAND2003-4670C, Sandia National homeland security, and the military. Stamp holds
a BS (1995) in electrical engineering from the
“Common Vulnerabilities in Criti- Laboratories, Albuquerque. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology,Terre Haute,
cal Infrastructure Control Systems” Ind., and a PhD (1998) in electrical engineering
SAND2003-1772C, Sandia National from Clemson University. Jason is a member of the
Laboratories, Albuquerque. The authors Power Engineering Society of IEEE.
Annie McIntyre is a senior
Kilman, D., and Stamp, J., “Frame- member of the technical staff Ben Cook is a principal
work for SCADA Security Policy,” Report at Sandia National Laborato- member of the technical staff
SAND2005-1002C, Sandia National ries, Albuquerque. In the Net- at Sandia National Laborato-
Laboratories, Albuquerque. worked Systems Survivability ries. He currently leads research
“I3P National Cyber Infrastructure organization, her primary areas efforts on robust critical
of research include threats, infrastructure systems and
Bulletin,” Vol. 1, No.1, Sandia National vulnerabilities, and protection supports the management of
Laboratories, Albuquerque. of critical infrastructure under Sandia’s process control research
“I3P SCADA Security Workshop Raw the I3P program and leading security metrics ef- and development. Cook is the
Data Report,” Sandia National Laborato- forts under the National SCADA Test Bed. Previous technical project leader for the I3P’s process control
ries, Albuquerque. to this, McIntyre worked extensively in the defense security research program, and Sandia’s project
sector on information warfare and survivability, lead on the DHS LOGIIC project. His technical
“Industry Security Needs/Concerns,” serving as IO Laboratory Chief and Informa- background is in modeling and simulation with an
Powerpoint presentation. tion Warfare Lead for Future Combat Systems emphasis on large-scale natural and engineered sys-
“Penetration Testing of Industrial Assessments at the Army Research Laboratory. She tems. Cook holds a ScD in information technology
Control Systems,” SAND2005-2846P, previously served as New Mexico Regional Manager from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquer- for Concurrent Technologies Corp. and performed
systems analysis and engineering under the Human Andrew Lanzone is a senior member of the
que. Genome Project. She holds a BS from New Mexico technical staff at Sandia National Laboratories.
“Security Guidelines for the Petro- Tech, an MS from Troy State University, and is a He has several years experience in both crypto-
leum Industry,” American Petroleum member of AAPG. graphic research and applied cryptography with an
Institute, April 2005, http://api-ec.api. emphasis on algorithm development and software
org/fi lelibrary/Security.pdf. Jason Stamp is a principal programming. Lanzone spent several years design-
___________________
member of the technical staff ing and analyzing cryptographic protocols and
“Security Vulnerability Assessment at Sandia National Laborato- digital security systems. He holds a BS in electrical
Methodology for the Petroleum and ries, where he has more than 7 engineering from Grove City College, Pa., and a
Petrochemical Industries,” 2nd Edition, years’ experience in the field of Masters of computer science and engineering from
American Petroleum Institute and Na- information systems and na- the University of Michigan.
tional Petrochemical & Refiners Associa- tional security. His research ar-
eas include the development of
tion, October 2004, http://api-ec.api. improved tools for information
org/fi lelibrary/SVA_E2.pdf.
___________________
BCCK
14 and affordably. Now, all that gas – and all those profits – are there for the taking.
Time to get yours.
For a personal consultation, call BCCK at 888-518-6459, or to learn more, go to www.bcck.com. E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
PR O C E S S I N G
Report
Matrikon Inc. This article explores a best-
Edmonton practices methodology to
ease the support and mainte-
A holistic, best-practices Process Control
nance challenges associated
approach will help refiners Technology with these types of control-
and petrochemical plant op- lers given new economic re-
erators sustain and improve alities for process companies
the performance of control worldwide.
system assets.
In many plants, there is a Background
significant gap between the long-term MPC is distinct from other control
benefits promised and those actually
delivered in the long term by multivari-
PROCESS technologies in two fundamental ways.
First, all MPC controllers use dynamic
able predictive control (MPC) assets. CONTROL—1 models that link the controlled variables
The difficulty of diagnosing and resolv- (CVs) and the manipulated variables
ing issues with MPC controllers results (MVs) in a process. These models allow
in the eventual failure of many systems. the controller to effectively predict the
Performance can be sustained when are a key element for corporations in future behavior of the process.
the application is monitored and achieving pacesetter status within their Second, a mathematical algorithm
maintained. Effective MPC application respective industries. (usually a linear program—LP) calcu-
maintenance requires the plant owner Despite the industrial success of lates the most efficient method of mov-
to monitor many interacting systems, implementing these technologies, real- ing the process to and keeping it at the
including the MPC itself, regulatory izing the benefits they can deliver over desired constraints.
controls, and instrumentation. It also the long term has proven to be a sig- The deployment and use of MPC is
requires effective work processes and nificant difficulty. It is not uncommon now commonplace in the refining and
documentation of the benefits of the to see controllers disabled altogether, or petrochemical industries. In a recent
application being maintained. controller limits pinched in by opera- survey paper, Qin and Badgwell de-
This first of two articles, discusses tors, leaving engineering or operations scribe how over the past two decades
MPC systems, causes of poor perfor- management to explain why this asset is thousands of applications have been
mance, and the best-practices approach. not delivering expected benefits. developed and deployed worldwide.1
The conclusion, next week, will Model-plant mismatch, constraint MPC benefits are generated directly
discuss a case study that describes how problems, misbehaving analyzers from its ability to control and maintain
a particular software solution facilitates and on-line estimators, poorly tuned a process at constraints that represent
the maintenance of an MPC control- regulatory controllers and sticky valves the most profitable operating point at
ler, quickly identifying problems in the are common faults with these types of a particular instant in time. Payback in
MPC itself and in the regulatory control controllers. Complicating matters is that most implementations has been report-
and instrumentation layers. maintenance and support organizations ed in months and in some cases weeks.
have been downsized, leaving fewer The practical result of operating any of
Process control resources to maintain both existing and these processes near their constraints
Constrained MPC has been widely future applications. have typically been reported as:
adopted in the refining and petro- One solution to the problem of • Higher plant throughputs.
chemical industries worldwide. In most maintaining benefits of MPC applica- • Higher yields of more valuable
cases, these controllers are designed to tions with constrained resources is to products.
push and maintain a plant at its most use systems to monitor and diagnose • Reduction in product quality
profitable operating point over extend- problems with MPC controllers, and variations.
ed periods. These types of technology with the foundation of regulatory • Lower energy consumption.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
• Improved unit operability and • 25% continue to deliver reduced declines. Control element and sensor
stability. benefits albeit reduced with good sup- performance, controller tuning, and
Although the relative cost of imple- port and no monitoring. controller design are the top causes of
menting these applications is small, • 10% will deliver increased ben- poor regulatory control.
maintaining these assets and ensuring efits with adequate support and online Several studies have been done across
they continue to accrue benefits over monitoring. industries and have documented that
the long term has proven to be a much anywhere from 40-80% of the regula-
greater challenge. It is now common to Poor MPC performance tory controls in a process plant can be
see MPC controllers shut off, or con- There are two groups of factors that significantly improved.2 4 5
straints pinched in such that they are affect control performance, technol- The effect of regulatory controller
delivering little benefit. Users regularlyogy and organizational factors. In any performance on MPC performance can
report that without the proper main- solution to this problem, both must be be significant because poorly perform-
tenance and attention, the benefits are addressed to sustain long-term benefits ing regulatory controllers affect the ac-
difficult to sustain. from improving the performance of curacy of the MPC models as well as the
these assets. effectiveness of the MPC control action.
Controller assessment, Online analyzers such as gas chro-
monitoring Technology factors matographs and inferential property
Throughout the process industries, Several factors inherently related to measurements are commonly used as
“operational excellence,” “continuous the technology used during the deploy- CVs in the design and deployment of
improvement,” “six sigma,” and simi- ment of MPC are known contributors to an MPC controller. Online analyzers are
larly named programs target improving the decline in performance of any MPC installed to measure important plant
the corporate bottom line by improv- application. These include: quality variables and are usually expen-
ing operating efficiencies. MPC, often • Poorly performing regulatory con- sive, complex, and difficult to maintain.
implemented under one of these pro- trols or faulty instrumentation. To compensate for this, as well as for
grams, has helped significantly improve • Faulty or poorly performing the sample delay induced by most plant
plant performance. process analyzers (gas chromatographs, analyzers, online property estimators
Unfortunately, during the life of an etc.) and online property estimators. are used.
application, controllers may go through • MPC model error. These estimators or inferential mod-
several cycles in which the controller • Disturbance problems. els use auxiliary measurements to infer
is shut off and recommissioned. Worse, • Constraint issues. the property measure of interest. Gas
the controller may be abandoned alto- • MPC tuning. chromatographs may take more than 15
gether if it is troublesome to maintain. All MPC applications are built on a min to analyze a sample so estimated
It is common to find MPC and real-time foundation of regulatory and advanced values are used in the control applica-
optimization (RTO) applications deliv- regulatory controls. Ironically, this tion between analyzer samples, permit-
ering only 50% of their original value hierarchy is often depicted as a pyramid ting control action to take place often
within 3 years. Within 5 years, there synonymous with enduring strength than once a sample. Estimators also
is often a project initiated that closely (Fig. 2). In reality, it can be as fragile as provide a useful means to cross-check
resembles the original.2 a house of cards with each layer depen- analyzer results; a large discrepancy
Shell recently noted that advanced dant on all of the layers below function- between the estimator and the analyzer
process control (APC) uptime averaged ing well. often indicate the analyzer result is
86% in a survey and a Solomon study Each element in the regulatory suspect.
on ethylene plants showed average con- control loop from the primary sensor to
troller up-times of 77%.3 the final control element must perform MPC-specific issues
MPC applications typically take one well in order for the advanced con- Specific problems with the MPC
of four paths depending on the level of troller to also perform well. This is of controller itself of course prevent an ap-
support and monitoring they receive. course why one of the first steps in any plication from generating benefits.
The path chosen, conscious or oth- MPC project involves a regulatory and The simple fact that MPC controllers
erwise, affects the application perfor- instrumentation layer tune-up. Valves optimize the process in the presence
mance tremendously (Fig. 1): are fixed, transmitters calibrated and of physical constraints allows them to
• 25% fail within just months of controllers are tuned accordingly prior generate the significant financial ben-
commissioning. to the implementation of any advanced efits that justify their implementation.
• 40% fail within about 3 years of controller. Constraint handling ensures the MPC
commissioning with inadequate sup- Unfortunately, over time the regu- controller is keeping the plant at or near
port and no monitoring. latory controller performance also an economic optimum. The effect of
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Business goals
P OSSIBLE MPC PERFORMANCE Fig. 1
On the business
side, changing
market condi-
Commissioning 2-3 years Good support,
online monitoring (10%)
tions can dramati-
cally influence the
performance of an
MPC application
Benefits
Support,
no monitoring (25%) that was commis-
sioned under a
particular set of
No monitoring, Poor support,
operating condi-
no support (25%) no monitoring (40%) tions. Changes in
product demand,
feedstocks, plant
Time
rates, product mix,
or energy prices
will all affect
performance of an
active constraints, however, is to change optimum control action to take based MPC controller. If business conditions
the effective process matrix and the ef- on current conditions. Model errors change significantly or often, the goals
fective controller gain. cause controllers to over or under-react, that were critical in justifying the con-
The controller can therefore change react too soon or too late, and worst troller implementation initially, typically
behavior significantly as the active set of all, decrease a controller’s ability to no longer apply.
of constraints changes. Bakker3 provides anticipate. Consider an MPC application in a
an excellent discussion of the need for Model degradation can occur with plant where the business conditions
monitoring active constraints; this can something as simple as heat exchanger have changed. Instead of the plant being
assist in determining the value of plant fouling. Changes in production rate, sold out of product where the pri-
debottlenecking projects that would pressure profile across the plant, utility mary business objective is to maximize
mean relaxing that constraint. allocations can all result in models that throughput, the plant is now running
MPC controllers are uniquely able to are no longer adequate. at lower rates and the business objective
make use of feedforward information. Troubleshooting model problems is has changed to minimizing operating
The models provide an excellent means not always a simple task because a large costs.
of predicting the result of an anticipated MPC controller with will have hundreds The new operating objectives create
disturbance, allowing the controller to of models. On a large controller, deter- three potential problems with the exist-
respond in a coordinated way, which mining if in fact model performance ing controller:
prevents undesired effects. Unfortunate- is the problem can be challenging, let • Tuning. The effective tuning at any
ly, it is impossible to anticipate every alone isolating the specific model set given instant depends on the initial
significant disturbance at each operat- that is responsible. tuning, process dynamics, and current
ing point that will affect the controller’s constraint set. The effective controller
performance. Organizational factors tuning depends not only on the original
Over time, it is necessary to re-as- Organizational factors that affect tuning, but which manipulated vari-
sess the significant disturbances that MPC performance are more critical than ables are available to move the CVs and
affect the MPC controller to deter- the technology issues. In the absence which are saturated. Those MVs that are
mine whether they should be added of technology, a good organization will saturated are effectively removed from
as feedforward variables or if existing always succeed; whereas technology the control calculation. This can change
feedforward models are adequate. The alone without organizational support the effective gain of the controller when
relatively slow scan rates and detuned cannot achieve results. the more effective MVs are saturated. A
nature of most MPC control applications Organizational factors considered are controller that is tuned when the plant
imply that the controller is ill-equipped the organization’s business goals, man- is operating at maximum rates may not
to deal with fast disturbances. agement support for advanced process work effectively when the plant is oper-
MPC controllers use models to cal- control, human resources, and work ating at a different operating point.
culate both the response of the process processes in place at the operating site. • Constraints. The optimum operat-
if no control is taken as well as the ing point will be at different constraints
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Independent operators are playing a vital role in oil and gas exploration and
CONFERENCE production, and their increased participation in the international E&P arena has
MANAGEMENT CONTACTS created information needs particular to that group.
Conference Manager However, there are as many financial opportunities challenges as there are technical
Victoria Knowles
challenges for independent operators. The savvy operator needs to know how to
Tel: + 44 (0) 1992 656 653
Fax: + 44 (0) 1992 656 735 assess the turbulent waters of international oil and gas exploration, what to look
Email: [email protected] out for, and where to go for the best advice.
Exhibit Sponsorship At PennWell’s Independent Operators Forum, executives, managers, and decision-
Sales Manager makers from small to mid-size independent operators, investors, financial institutions,
Dawn Peek (in the US)
and law firms from around the world gather to exchange information, experiences,
Tel: +1 713 963 6213
Fax: +1 713 963 6201 plans and forecasts. Subject matter runs from innovative redevelopment concepts
Email: [email protected] to project financing, from new technologies to decommissioning and abandonment
liabilities. Leading experts in the field will address each of these topics.
Exhibit Sponsorship
Sales Manager If you are involved in international exploration and production, you need to know the
Jonathan Franklin (in the UK)
Tel: +44 (0) 1992 656 658
latest information on both these technical challenges and want to know about the
Fax: +44 (0) 1992 656 700 financial opportunities. The Independent Operators Forum brings the best minds in
Email: [email protected] the business together for two days of strategic information and real-life solutions.
Make your plans now to be there.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
PR O C E S S I N G
when minimizing cost as opposed to Human resources insight, but also to gain acceptance for
maximizing rates. New constraints MPC controllers are typically com- the new technology and provide criti-
mean that new MVs are saturated and missioned and maintained by well- cal operator training on the use and
new MVs are available to control the trained and skilled process control troubleshooting of the application.
process. Because it is likely that the con- engineers. At the beginning of an MPC With adequate training, insight, and
troller was not commissioned with this project, these resources are typically skill to identify performance degrada-
set of active constraints, it may perform employed either on a contract basis tion early, operations personnel are
poorly. Mitigation may require control- from a control vendor’s organization, or invaluable at spotting trouble and
ler recommissioning or even a redesign. from within the organization itself. providing the process control engineer
• Models. Because the plant is now An assumption often made by man- with valuable diagnostic information.
running at a different operating point, agement is that when implementation is Conversely, if the operators do not
process dynamics may be significantly complete, the project team will main- understand the application, its purpose,
different. MPC controllers rely on tain the applications over the long term. and limitations, or if it causes too much
models to predict the effects of control Often, however, the control engineers extra work, it will likely be unused.
moves and disturbances. If the models that commissioned the controllers move Despite advances in the ease of use
do not reflect the current dynamics, the on to new projects often with little or and tools to more effectively deploy and
predictions will be poor resulting in no overlap between implementation support these applications, knowledge-
poor control. and support personnel; documentation able well-trained human resources still
from the commissioning team is often remain a prerequisite in maintaining
Management support inadequate to effectively maintain these the long-term performance of these
Management personnel are typically systems. applications.
sold on the benefits of an APC project Additionally, many skilled control
before implementation. Because MPC engineers leave these organizations, of- Maintenance work processes
technology is mature, vendors are ten leaving a large number of legacy ap- Another cause of the decline in MPC
able to quote typical results in similar plications to be maintained by a smaller, performance is the lack of effective
facilities and the project is given the less-skilled workforce. work processes and methods to support
go-ahead. Similarly, maintenance groups have these applications and underlying regu-
An average crude unit MPC con- been asked to do more with less. Fewer latory controllers. Work processes are
troller implementation, for example, instrumentation and electrical (I/E) re- the methods and procedures by which
will exceed several hundred thousand sources are monitoring more regulatory the organization addresses the technical
dollars in cost, but will return this controllers. A ratio of several hundred issues described previously.
investment many times during the life regulatory control loops per mainte- Most companies we have encoun-
of the application, with payback within nance person is not uncommon. tered working with MPC applications
the first year of operation. On a typical Because good regulatory control do not use rigorous work processes to
project, at completion of the job, results performance is a necessary requirement address both the technical and organi-
are typically delivered as promised and for good MPC performance, the lack of zational factors that affect MPC perfor-
everyone is satisfied with the results routine regulatory controller mainte- mance. Maintenance on the MPC layer
generated. nance is a significant contributor to the is typically done by control engineering
For many reasons, several months inadequate performance of an advanced personnel. A single engineer may have
after the project team has moved on, controller. several control applications that he is
the application may no longer be in Operations staff, of course, interact responsible for as well as other respon-
service. Management is faced with the on a day-to-day basis with the control sibilities in the plant.
dilemma of why a significant invest- applications implemented in their area. The most commonly used criteria
ment in technology, time, and resources As a general rule, as long as these ap- to determine if maintenance is applied
has not continued to accrue benefits to plications make for a smoother opera- to an application is the “service fac-
the business. Although management has tion and do not make the operators’ tor” and operator feedback. Both are
bought and paid for the initial applica- job functions more difficult, they will good measures of MPC performance,
tion, they typically have little day-to-day remain in service. Controllers that are but should not be the only criteria by
insight into the long-term performance pushing constraints that are illogical or which decisions are made to spend
of these applications. They are there- not understood by the operator will be money maintaining an application.
fore challenged in attempting to make adjusted or shut off quickly. Diagnosing MPC problems is another
sound financial decisions regarding the A well-executed advanced control matter. It can take days or even weeks to
ongoing support and maintenance. project includes key operations person- diagnose problems with large MPC ap-
nel not only to provide valuable process plications. Without the proper tools and
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
TR A N S P O R T A T I O N
External corrosion erally referred to as blind digs, and
direct assessment (ECDA) may be used to assess the confidence
can serve as a power- in the probability of detection of the DIRECT ASSESSMENT—
ful tool in determining
not only the current but
survey technique(s).
Information found at the excava-
Conclusion
also the future health of Pipelines tions updates the information used
a given pipeline sys- in the preassessment and indirect
tem. Gasunie has developed software inspection steps. This updating includes
(PIMSlider) to aggregate ECDA data and updating survey characteristics, number
allow increasingly accurate projections of defects, defect depth, corrosion rate,
of line-failure probability. time of initiation, defect length,
Part 1 of this article, presented last and the critical defect depth. These
week, provided the overall integrity
management (IM) context in which
updates provide the basis for calcu-
lating new values for the probabil- ECDA tunes Gasunie
PIMSlider is being applied. This con- ity of failure both of the defect and
cluding part examines the direct exami- per km of the ECDA region.
nation and postassessment steps of the The bell-hole excavations must
corrosion predictions
IM process in greater detail and
provides an ECDA example from
Gasunie’s own system. E CDA FLOWCHART Fig. 1
vation sites.
Updated distribution,
Excavations generally take number of defects
place at locations:
• Where both surveys (coat-
ing and corrosion) have given an Direct examination, postassessment
indication; usually to determine
Examination(s) Examination(s) results
the size of corrosion defects and
repair any critical defects.
Update survey
• Where only one of the characteristics Update distribution defect,
surveys has given an indication; critical-defect depth
usually to check the survey char- Update distribution,
acteristics and determine the size number of defects
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
TR A N S P O R T A T I O N
lations, but assumes for consistency that
all coating defects found are repaired.
The updated probability of failure of
a defect at the time of excavation de-
pends on the updated value of distribu-
tion of the defect depth, distribution of
the critical defect depth, and expected
number of corrosion defects. The updat-
ed probability of failure/km at the time
of excavations depends on the updated
distribution of failure of a defect and
the length of the ECDA region.
The probability of failure for a single
defect will change with each excavation
as the distribution of the corrosion rate
and time of initiation also change. A
confidence interval is calculated for the
probability of failure. As the number of
excavations increases, the probability of
failure/km normally decreases, until the
criterion for the probability of failure is
PIMSlider identifies ECDA regions by retrieving and graphically displaying data necessary for preassess- met, showing that sufficient excavations
ment (Fig. 2). for the specific ECDA region have been
carried out.
gather information on: location of As mentioned earlier, excavation of
coating and (active) corrosion defects,
PIPELINE INFORMATION, Table 1
ECDA regions occurs sequentially, start-
ECDA SEGMENT
dimensions of corrosion defects (defect Total length 13.7 km
ing with the region with the highest
depth, defect length in axial direction), OD, nominal 165 mm initial risk.
WT, nominal 4.8 mm
and clock position of the corrosion Grade B Results of the calculations for an
defects (not relevant to the current External coating type Bituminous ECDA region can provide the starting
CP type Impressed current
model). Information should be used Commissioning date 1953 point for the next ECDA region. The
Maximum operating
from every excavation, including those pressure 40 bar user can replace the initial values for
where no or only small defects were corrosion rate, time of initiation, and
found. defect density for that ECDA region
All ECDA regions must perform be deduced from previous surveys on with the values calculated for the ECDA
model calculations. The direct-examina- other similar pipelines. New infor- region with the higher initial risk.
tion step makes the following groups mation from the indirect inspections Inspectors repeat this process until all
of calculations (updates) for each ECDA uses Bayesian statistics to immediately ECDA regions have been covered.
region: update the prior distribution. The ex-
• Survey characteristics. cavations allow an update of the survey Postassessment
• Number of defects (coating and characteristics, after which the number According to the NACE, the ob-
corrosion) as a function of time. of coating defects can be updated again. jectives of the postassessment are to
• Defect depth, corrosion rate, and The probability of failure increases define reassessment intervals and assess
time of initiation. with the growth of corrosion defects the overall effectiveness of the ECDA
• Defect length and critical defect and an increasing number of defects, process. For the developed structural
depth. but generally decreases as a result of the reliability analysis (SRA) model, this
• Probability of failure (of a defect indirect inspections and direct examina- step consists of:
and per km of the ECDA region). tions. The probability of failure, how- • Calculating the future probability
The updating process for the number ever, will increase again due to ongoing of failure/km due to external corrosion
of coating defects is represented by a corrosion processes. for each ECDA region, based on indirect
normal distribution. The prior estimate ECDA assumes that all found corro- inspections and direct examinations.
uses information collected during the sion defects are repaired (or recoated). • Calculating the future probability
preassessment step (e.g., coating condi- The repair of coating defects will not of failure/km for each ECDA region for
tion, age of the pipeline), but may also have a significant effect on ECDA calcu- all other considered failure modes.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
• Depending on the calculated Case study PIMSLider can be used to assist a pipe-
probability of failure/km, calculating Table 1 contains the details of a pipe- line operator in performing a preas-
the time interval until the next direct line subjected to ECDA in 2005. Assess- sessment, displaying the geographic
assessment is required. ing all relevant input parameters related position of the pipeline under consider-
When new aboveground surveys to pipeline geometry, material proper- ation, allowing the user to zoom in on
are carried out on an already inspected ties, defect dimensions, and incident any segment of interest, and showing
pipeline the pipeline becomes subject frequencies, including their respective corresponding pipeline, environmen-
to a new direct assessment. The results uncertainties, yields a first estimate of tal, incident, or operational data. If the
of a previous direct assessment are avail- the current integrity of the pipeline. required data are missing for a specific
able for use in the preassessment step of The first section of Table 2 shows pipeline, the DA module can retrieve
the next direct assessment. this estimate: a prior failure probability data from similar pipelines to estimate
Fig. 1 gives a summary of the most per km of pipeline in the year 2005 the prior condition of the pipeline. The
important routines that the operator (52 years after commissioning) of PF = DA module also identifies and calculates
will go through when using the DA 0.18/km; unacceptably high according the ECDA regions, following user defi-
module for PIMSlider. to ASME B31.8. nition of the relevant parameters and
Fig. 2 gives an example of how criteria to be considered.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
TR A N S P O R T A T I O N
DCVG RESULTS Fig. 3
In the indirect inspection step, the
DA module allows the user to store and
DCVG results
60 analyze data from aboveground surveys,
assess the severity of defects, and iden-
50 tify areas where corrosion may occur
(Fig. 3).
40
The last section of Table 2 shows the
% IR
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
0.10 Initial
After excavations
0.09
Probability
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Defect depth, mm
1 Updated after
aboveground surveys
–2
Failure probability, km-1
1 × 10
1 × 10–4
1 × 10–6
1 × 10–8
Updated after
1 × 10–10 excavations
1 × 10–12 ECDA
applied
1 × 10–14
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
system. Actual corrosion anomalies were Table 2 shows that the corrosion
found at four of these sites. This infor- growth rate decreases significantly to
mation updated the probability of false 0.015 mm/year, as compared to its
indication of CIPS to 38% from 20%. prior value of 0.054 mm/year, resulting
The other 13 excavations, where no in a much lower probability of failure
corrosion was suspected based on the as compared to the preassessment.
CIPS data, resulted in two additional ECDA, in combination with SRA,
corrosion defects, leading to a decrease effectively demonstrated the integrity of
in the probability of detection of CIPS the pipeline. Even though the expected
to 27% from its initially estimated number of corrosion defects is much
value of 60%. The updated performance higher than estimated initially, the cor-
indicators (probability of detection rosion anomalies found were all minor
and probability of false indication) of in nature, resulting in a significantly
both indirect inspection tools led the lower average defect depth than initially
expected number of corrosion defects estimated.
to increase to 181 from a prior value Fig. 6 shows the overall effect of
of six. the ECDA process on the probability of
Accurate measurements of corrosion failure. The adjusted probability density
defect depths and lengths during the function of the number of corrosion
excavations allow an updating of their defects, together with the updated de-
respective distributions. Updating the fect depth distribution and the updated
defect depth distribution allows calcula- critical defect depth distribution, result
tion of the corresponding corrosion in a decrease of the probability of fail-
growth rate (Fig. 5). ure to PF = 4.0 × 10–9/km. ✦
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
E q u i p m e n t / S o f t w a r e / L i t e r a t u r e
S e r v i c e s / S u p p l i e r s
Implicit Monitoring Solutions LP (IMS) provider of operations and maintenance with more than 970 lawyers in 14 loca-
and services to the Gulf of Mexico inland, tions around the world.
Wilson shelf, and deepwater operations, and inter-
Dallas, have announced a partnership nationally. Pride International Inc.
agreement whereby Wilson will market John Wood Group PLC is an interna- Houston, has
IMS’ Intellisite remote asset data capture tional energy services company provid- announced the ap-
and reporting service to customers in the ing a range of engineering, production pointment of Rodney
major producing areas of the US. support, maintenance management, and W. Eads as executive
Implicit Monitoring Solutions LP pro- industrial gas turbine overhaul and repair vice-president and
vides technologies and resources to help services to the oil and gas, and power gen- chief operating officer.
companies effectively manage remote oil eration industries. His responsibilities
and gas producing assets. The Intellisite cover the company’s
service delivers secure field production Fulbright & Jaworski LLP worldwide offshore
data to the client via the Internet. Houston, has announced that Brian operations and Eastern Eads
Bradshaw has joined the firm as an energy Hemisphere land assets.
Wood Group Production Services (WGPS) partner. Bradshaw’s practice is focused on Eads, who holds a
Houston, has promoted Louis Gueniot cross-border and international projects, BS degree in chemical engineering from
to senior vice-president, and Jim Justice to with emphasis on development and fi- West Virginia Institute of Technology, and
Louisiana business unit manager, succeed- nancing of LNG liquefaction and regasifi- an MBA from Rice University, joins Pride
ing Gueniot. cation terminals, and other large-scale from Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. He
Gueniot joined WGPS in 1990 as man- energy infrastructure projects. He earned previously was employed by Exxon Corp.,
ager of its Houma business unit. his JD and MBA from the University of where he held primarily international as-
Justice, who has 28 years of experience Houston, and his AB from Washington signments from 1980 to 1997.
in offshore operations and human resourc- University. Pride International Inc. is one of the
es, has been with WGPS since 1994. Founded in 1919, Fulbright & Jawor- world’s largest drilling contractors, provid-
Wood Group Production Services, a ski LLP is a leading international law firm ing onshore and offshore drilling and
part of John Wood Group PLC, is a leading related services in more than 25 countries.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Statistics
API IMPORTS OF CRUDE AND PRODUCTS Additional analysis of market trends is available
through OGJ Online, Oil & Gas Journal’s electronic
— Districts 1-4 — — District 5 — ———— Total US ———— information source, at http://www.ogjonline.com.
1 1 1
9-29 9-22 9-29 9-22 9-29 9-22 9-30
2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2005
—–––––––––––––––––––––––– 1,000 b/d ––––––––––––––––––––––––—
East Coast .......................................................... 2,925 1,428 1,453 1,618 89.8 1,824 92 458 116
App. Dist. 1 ........................................................ 104 95 95 95 100.0 15 0 30 1
Dist. 1 total .................................................. 2,658 1,669 1,681 1,713 98.1 1,872 95 452 152
Ind., Ill., Ky. ......................................................... 2,229 2,117 2,132 2,355 90.5 1,096 156 638 46
Minn., Wis., Dak. ............................................... 381 343 343 442 77.6 226 26 101 68
Okla., Kan., Mo. ................................................. 912 778 783 786 99.6 449 34 272 7
Dist. 2 total .................................................. 3,522 3,238 3,258 3,583 90.9 1,771 216 1,011 59
Inland Texas ....................................................... 887 621 636 647 98.3 487 42 197 6
Texas Gulf Coast ................................................ 3,364 3,095 3,173 3,264 97.2 1,346 355 867 77
La. Gulf Coast ..................................................... 3,309 3,214 3,227 3,264 98.9 1,329 398 879 84
N. La. and Ark. ................................................... 217 191 198 215 92.1 92 9 46 3
New Mexico ....................................................... 170 109 112 113 99.1 94 3 35 0
Dist. 3 total .................................................. 8,677 7,366 7,599 8,270 91.9 3,471 742 2,077 244
Dist. 4 total .................................................. 662 541 561 596 94.1 252 28 172 18
Dist. 5 total .................................................. 2,777 2,574 2,777 3,173 87.5 1,781 414 604 142
——— ——— ——— ——— —— ——— —– ——– ——–
Sept. 29, 2006 ................................................... 18,667 15,242 15,743 17,335 90.8 9,114 1,492 4,352 580
Sept. 22, 2006* ................................................. 19,165 15,624 16,197 17,335 93.4 9,215 1,507 4,265 675
Sept. 30, 2005 ................................................... 13,228 11,337 11,777 17,115 68.8 7,481 1,101 2,999 4866
*Revised.
Source: American Petroleum Institute.
Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Statistics
OGJ GASOLINE PRICES BAKER HUGHES RIG COUNT OGJ PRODUCTION REPORT
1 2
Price Pump Pump 9-29-06 9-30-05 9-29-06 9-30-05
ex tax price* price –—— 1,000 b/d —–—
9-27-06 9-27-06 9-28-05 Alabama ............................................ 5 5
————— ¢/gal ————— Alaska ................................................ 6 8 (Crude oil and lease condensate)
Arkansas ............................................ 26 12 Alabama ........................................ 18 21
(Approx. prices for self-service unleaded gasoline) California ........................................... 34 32 Alaska ............................................ 755 815
Atlanta .......................... 194.9 238.4 260.2 Land ................................................. 30 27 California ....................................... 679 696
Baltimore ...................... 204.5 246.4 266.4 Offshore .......................................... 4 5 Colorado ........................................ 7 50
Boston .......................... 205.5 247.4 296.7 Colorado ............................................ 96 81 Florida ............................................ 29 6
Buffalo .......................... 190.8 258.7 286.8 Florida ................................................ 0 2 Illinois ............................................ 91 31
Miami ........................... 203.7 254.0 287.1 Illinois ................................................ 0 0 Kansas ........................................... 1,337 91
Newark ......................... 215.5 248.4 287.1 Indiana ............................................... 0 0 Louisiana ....................................... 14 488
New York ...................... 194.8 262.7 290.8 Kansas ............................................... 9 7 Michigan ....................................... 50 17
Norfolk .......................... 187.4 225.4 277.6 Kentucky ............................................ 10 7 Mississippi .................................... 92 39
Philadelphia .................. 203.2 253.9 296.5 Louisiana ........................................... 199 176 Montana ........................................ 161 95
Pittsburgh ..................... 197.7 248.4 274.0 N. Land ............................................ 58 51 New Mexico .................................. 104 158
Wash., DC .................... 220.4 258.8 294.7 S. Inland waters .............................. 20 19 North Dakota ................................. 172 99
PAD I avg.................. 201.7 249.3 282.9 S. Land ............................................ 45 34 Oklahoma ...................................... 1,351 169
Offshore .......................................... 76 72 Texas ............................................. 44 1,144
Chicago ......................... 209.3 264.4 303.7 Maryland ........................................... 1 0 Utah ............................................... 141 45
Cleveland ...................... 169.1 215.5 278.6 Michigan ........................................... 1 2 Wyoming ....................................... 69 143
Des Moines .................. 164.5 204.6 252.7 Mississippi ........................................ 12 9 All others ....................................... ——– 69 —— 77
Detroit .......................... 173.7 226.6 264.8 Montana ............................................ 15 25 Total ......................................... 5,183 4,184
Indianapolis .................. 167.5 216.5 271.8 Nebraska ........................................... 0 0 1
Kansas City ................... 176.7 212.7 259.8 New Mexico ...................................... 89 94 OGJ estimate. 2Revised.
Louisville ...................... 172.7 209.6 268.7 New York ........................................... 8 6 Source: Oil & Gas Journal.
Memphis ...................... 188.7 228.5 276.8 North Dakota ..................................... 35 24 Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database.
Milwaukee ................... 195.2 246.5 285.7 Ohio ................................................... 9 9
Minn.-St. Paul ..............
Oklahoma City ..............
182.3
175.2
222.7
210.6
259.6
258.9
Oklahoma ..........................................
Pennsylvania .....................................
191
14
155
14
US CRUDE PRICES
Omaha .......................... 176.0 221.4 277.6 South Dakota ..................................... 3 5 $/bbl* 9-29-06
St. Louis ........................ 186.9 222.9 276.8 Texas ................................................. 790 671
Tulsa ............................. 173.2 208.6 258.8 Offshore .......................................... 8 9 Alaska-North Slope 27° ....................................... 66.71
Wichita ......................... 172.2 215.6 268.7 Inland waters .................................. 2 1 South Louisiana Sweet ........................................ 58.95
PAD II avg................. 178.9 221.8 270.9 Dist. 1 .............................................. 25 13 California-Kern River 13° ..................................... 51.15
Dist. 2 .............................................. 25 38 Lost Hills 30° ........................................................ 58.60
Albuquerque ................. 201.4 237.8 271.7 Dist. 3 .............................................. 56 104 Wyoming Sweet ................................................... 63.16
Birmingham .................. 175.4 214.1 275.2 Dist. 4 .............................................. 93 68 East Texas Sweet ................................................. 61.01
Dallas-Fort Worth ......... 170.9 209.3 271.2 Dist. 5 .............................................. 138 74 West Texas Sour 34° ........................................... 50.75
Houston ........................ 174.8 213.2 279.2 Dist. 6 .............................................. 118 106 West Texas Intermediate ..................................... 59.50
Little Rock ..................... 176.9 217.1 269.6 Dist. 7B ............................................ 46 17 Oklahoma Sweet .................................................. 59.50
New Orleans ................ 200.7 239.1 NA Dist. 7C ............................................ 38 41 Texas Upper Gulf Coast ........................................ 56.25
San Antonio .................. 194.0 232.4 266.4 Dist. 8 .............................................. 95 76 Michigan Sour ...................................................... 52.50
PAD III avg................ 184.9 223.3 272.2 Dist. 8A ........................................... 29 24 Kansas Common ................................................... 58.50
Dist. 9 .............................................. 41 35 North Dakota Sweet ............................................ 52.25
Cheyenne ...................... 218.9 251.3 280.9 Dist. 10 ............................................ 76 65 *Current major refiner’s posted prices except North Slope lags
Denver .......................... 222.4 262.8 292.6 Utah ................................................... 46 25 2 months. 40° gravity crude unless differing gravity is shown.
Salt Lake City ............... 229.3 272.2 282.6 West Virginia .................................... 26 25
PAD IV avg. .............. 223.5 262.1 285.4 Wyoming ........................................... 112 83 Source: Oil & Gas Journal.
Others—HI-1; ID-1; NV-1; OR-1; Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database.
Los Angeles .................. 203.4 264.0 297.9 TN-1; VA-1; WA-1 ......................... ——–7 ——–6
Phoenix .........................
Portland ........................
199.0
220.4
236.4
263.7
299.0
275.7
Total US
Total Canada ..............................
1,744
353
1,483
537
WORLD CRUDE PRICES
San Diego ..................... 207.3 267.9 309.6 ——– ——–
San Francisco ............... 218.6 279.2 300.7 Grand total .................................. 2,097 2,020 $/bbl1 9-22-06
Seattle .......................... 224.1 273.6 286.0 Oil rigs ............................................... 310 203 United Kingdom-Brent 38° ..................................... 60.49
PAD V avg. ............... 212.1 264.1 294.8 Gas rigs ............................................. 1,422 1,273 Russia-Urals 32° .................................................... 57.28
Week’s avg. ................ 193.8 238.2 272.2 Total offshore .................................... 95 87 Saudi Light 34°....................................................... 56.80
Sept. avg. .................... 208.9 253.3 282.5 Total cum. avg. YTD ....................... 1,625 1,351 Dubai Fateh 32° ..................................................... 57.94
Aug. avg. ..................... 252.4 296.7 250.2 Algeria Saharan 44°............................................... 61.60
2006 to date ................ 222.1 265.6 — Rotary rigs from spudding in to total depth. Nigeria-Bonny Light 37°......................................... 62.15
2005 to date ................ 177.6 219.7 — Definitions, see OGJ Sept. 18, 2006, p. 42. Indonesia-Minas 34°.............................................. 62.61
Venezuela-Tia Juana Light 31° .............................. 55.33
*Includes state and federal motor fuel taxes and state Source: Baker Hughes Inc. Mexico-Isthmus 33° ............................................... 55.22
sales tax. Local governments may impose additional taxes. Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database. OPEC basket ........................................................... 58.81
Source: Oil & Gas Journal. Total OPEC2 ............................................................. 57.55
Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database.
SMITH RIG COUNT Total non-OPEC2......................................................
Total world2 ............................................................
US imports3 ............................................................
55.60
56.38
54.46
9-29-06 9-30-05
REFINED PRODUCT PRICES Proposed depth,
ft
Rig
count
Percent Rig Percent
footage* count footage*
1
Estimated contract prices. 2Average price (FOB) weighted
by estimated export volume. 3Average price (FOB) weighted
9-22-06 9-22-06 by estimated import volume.
¢/gal ¢/gal 0-2,500 50 — 24 41 Source: DOE Weekly Petroleum Status Report.
2,501-5,000 83 38.5 64 34.3 Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database.
Spot market product prices 5,001-7,500 238 20.5 149 20.8
Motor gasoline
Heating oil
No. 2
7,501-10,000
10,001-12,500
398
388
3.7
2.0
337
320
4.1
1.5 US NATURAL GAS STORAGE1
(Conventional-regular) New York Harbor .... 157.88 12,501-15,000 293 0.6 297 — 9-29-06 9-22-06 Change
New York Harbor ......... 150.75 Gulf Coast ............... 162.00 15,001-17,500 112 — 112 — –———— Bcf ————–
Gulf Coast .................... 144.88 Gas oil 17,501-20,000 71 — 49 —
Los Angeles ................. 163.55 ARA ........................... 169.21 20,001-over 35 — 17 — Producing region ............... 942 915 27
Amsterdam-Rotterdam- Singapore .................. 170.98 Total 1,668 6.3 1,369 5.3 Consuming region east ..... 1,874 1,835 39
Antwerp (ARA) ........... 143.91 Consuming region west .... ——– 438 ——–427 —––11
Singapore ..................... 157.14 Residual fuel oil INLAND 38 40 Total US ........................... 3,254 3,177 77
Motor gasoline ............... New York Harbor .... 84.83 LAND 1,564 1,275 Change,
(Reformulated-regular) Gulf Coast ............... 86.31 OFFSHORE 66 54 July 06 July 05 %
New York Harbor ......... 147.80 Los Angeles ............ 117.41
Gulf Coast .................... 148.05 ARA ......................... 97.62 *Rigs employed under footage contracts. Total US2 .......................... 2,779 2,450 13.4
Los Angeles ................. 168.55 Singapore ................. 104.56 Definitions, see OGJ, Sept. 18, 2006, p. 42. 1
Working gas. 2At end of period.
Note: Current data not available.
Source: DOE Weekly Petroleum Status Report. Source: Smith International Inc. Source: Energy Information Administration
Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database. Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database. Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
Azerbaijan ..................................... 630 600 590 391 199 51.0 14.0 24.0 172.00
Croatia ........................................... 17 16 17 18 –1 –4.3 4.9 4.2 33.06
Hungary ......................................... 15 17 17 20 –3 –15.7 8.5 7.6 63.00
Kazakhstan .................................... 1,300 1,200 1,107 969 139 14.3 60.0 100.0 496.00
Romania ........................................ 98 98 99 100 –1 –0.7 18.0 18.0 119.00
Russia ............................................ 9,520 9,600 9,446 9,113 333 3.7 1,750.0 1,925.0 13,315.00
Other FSU ...................................... 500 500 514 400 114 28.6 400.0 450.0 3,200.00
Other Eastern Europe .................... 46 43 44 49 –5 –9.6 41.8 31.3 286.49
–––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– –––– ––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––––
Eastern Europe and FSU 12,126 12,074 11,835 11,059 776 7.0 2,297.2 2,560.1 17,684.54
Algeria1 ......................................... 1,330 1,350 1,351 1,341 10 0.7 286.0 268.0 1,879.00
Angola ........................................... 1,462 1,303 1,393 1,142 251 22.0 2.4 2.2 16.40
Cameroon ...................................... 90 91 89 81 9 10.9 — — —
Congo (former Zaire) ..................... 20 20 20 20 — — — — —
Congo (Brazzaville) ........................ 240 240 240 240 — — — — —
Egypt ............................................. 650 640 680 697 –17 –2.5 42.0 41.0 282.00
Equatorial Guinea ......................... 320 320 320 320 — — 0.1 0.1 0.42
Gabon ............................................ 230 240 239 230 9 3.7 0.3 0.3 2.12
Libya1 ............................................ 1,720 1,700 1,689 1,633 56 3.4 22.0 22.0 150.50
Nigeria1 ........................................ 2,260 2,290 2,220 2,406 –186 –7.7 75.0 74.0 480.00
Sudan ............................................ 290 290 290 290 — — — — —
Tunisia ........................................... 68 67 65 72 –7 –9.4 7.1 6.2 46.77
Other Africa ................................... 243 243 242 243 –1 –0.3 10.2 10.2 70.35
––––– ––––– ——– ––––– ––– ––– ––––– ––––– ––––––––
Africa ................................ 8,923 8,794 8,838 8,715 124 1.4 445.1 424.0 2,927.56
Bahrain ..........................................
170 172 173 175 –1 –0.7 26.6 26.7 181.65
Iran1 ..............................................
4,250 3,950 3,876 3,926 –50 –1.3 285.0 275.0 1,893.00
Iraq1 ..............................................
2,060 2,070 1,886 1,830 56 3.0 5.5 5.0 35.90
Kuwait1,2 ......................................
2,475 2,510 2,507 2,403 104 4.3 31.0 31.0 213.50
Oman .............................................
730 740 750 744 6 0.8 59.0 59.0 407.00
Qatar1 ...........................................
840 830 823 783 40 5.1 119.0 116.0 797.00
Saudi Arabia1,2 ............................
9,215 9,210 9,249 9,247 1 — 176.0 190.0 1,264.00
Syria ..............................................
430 430 436 467 –31 –6.7 15.5 15.5 108.00
United Arab Emirates1 .................. 2,670 2,630 2,630 2,383 247 10.4 135.0 132.0 909.00
Yemen ...........................................
360 350 346 347 –1 –0.4 — — —
Other Middle East ......................... — — — — — 9.9 9.3 6.0 47.09
–––––– –––––– –––––– –––––– ––– ––– ––––– ––––– ––––––––
Middle East ...................... 23,200 22,892 22,675 22,305 370 1.7 861.9 856.3 5,856.13
Australia ........................................
496 352 376 448 –72 –16.2 134.0 112.0 794.50
Brunei ............................................
190 194 201 184 17 9.5 35.3 31.9 249.26
China .............................................
3,716 3,737 3,704 3,624 80 2.2 169.5 162.6 1,210.03
India ..............................................
679 706 676 684 –8 –1.1 82.5 82.7 564.08
Indonesia1 .....................................
890 900 914 949 –34 –3.6 190.0 195.0 1,340.00
Japan ............................................
15 16 17 16 — 2.2 8.6 10.0 70.09
Malaysia .......................................
740 750 741 789 –47 –6.0 144.0 140.0 969.00
New Zealand .................................12 16 15 15 — –0.9 12.5 10.0 77.50
Pakistan .........................................
65 65 65 65 — 0.2 122.0 118.0 834.59
Papua New Guinea ....................... 55 58 58 46 12 25.2 0.5 0.5 3.50
Thailand ........................................
203 210 215 172 43 25.1 73.0 72.7 497.66
Viet Nam .......................................
340 340 340 340 — — 15.0 15.0 105.00
Other Asia–Pacific ........................ 29 30 31 35 –3 –9.3 65.5 66.5 452.05
——— –——— –––––– –––––– –––– –––– ––––––– ––––––– ––––––––
Asia Pacific ....................... 7,430 7,373 7,353 7,366 –12 –0.2 1,052.3 1,017.0 7,167.27
TOTAL WORLD ................. 73,575 72,666 72,706 72,122 584 0.8 8,069.3 8,447.4 58,907.99
*OPEC ............................................ 30,180 30,030 29,741 29,631 110 0.4 1,404.5 1,393.0 9,536.90
North Sea ...................................... 4,397 4,125 4,461 4,888 –428 –8.7 495.6 591.0 4,377.93
1
OPEC member. 2Kuwait and Saudi Arabia production each include half of Neutral Zone. Totals may not add due to rounding.
Source: Oil & Gas Journal. Data available in Oil & Gas Journal Energy Database.
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
C l a s s i f i e d A d v e r t i s i n g
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
EMPLOYMENT MISCELLANEOUS
Program faculty report directly to the Program Director who has overall responsibility for FOR LEASE: (5 year prefer) The Narrows
Plantation for Corp. hunting retreat. 550 ac estate
leadership of the Petroleum Engineering program. Faculty will teach undergraduate and on Lake Arthur, La. Beautiful family home on Na-
graduate courses, develop an active research program, and engage in departmental and tional Register. Ducks, geese, doves, quail,
institutional service. They will have outstanding opportunities to interact with national and deer, fishing & water sports.
international Petroleum Institute stakeholders for development of research and service Slide show. www.TheNarrowsPlantation.com
(consulting, continuing education) programs. Involvement in professional society activities is
encouraged and supported. COMPUTER SOFTWARE
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
C l a s s i f i e d A d v e r t i s i n g
EQUIPMENT FOR SALE
________________
PROSPECTS
___________
__________
Farmins available : 60 MM
acres Australia, 4 basins, 200+
prospects and leads, oil, gas
Post.
REFRIGERATION AND J.T. PLANTS
10 MMSCFD, 1100 PSI, CHAPMANN; and Helium with GTL plans
www.centralpetroleum.com.au
Search.
7 MMSCFD, 1100 PSI, T.H. RUSSELL; [email protected]
3 MMSCFD, 600 PSI, PROCESS EQPT.;
2 MMSCFD, 1100PSI, PROCESS EQPT.;
WELLHEAD EQUIPMENT
6 MMSCFD, 2500 PSI, I.T.; 5 MMSCFD, 1200 PSI,
H&H I.T.; 4.5 MMSCFD, 1050 PSI, J.T.; 5
GPM, 1100 PSI, AMINE PLANT; 42”, 1440
PSI, 8 TRAY, 750 MMBTU/HR DEHY.
FOR SALE: 2-9/16” x 1-3/16” 20,000 PSI -
STAINLESS STEEL, WKM X-MAS TREE
ASSY - For H2S Service, Reconditioned - API
Work!
PLEASE CALL 318-425-2533, 318-458-1874; Test Report - PSL Rating 3, We buy and sell Natu- PennEnergyJOBS is The Energy Industry’s
ral Gas Plants; Gas Plant, Components and Large Most Powerful Career Site in the Making.
[email protected] Propane/Butane Tanks, Gas Corporation Focused on serving the recruitment needs of
energy employers and industry professionals
of America-www.gas-corp.com, Tel: 940-723-
globally.
Process Units 6015 - email - [email protected]
Attention Employers:
Crude Topping Units Striving to lower your cost per hire? Post
6,000 BPSD your jobs on PennEnergyJOBS and instantly
reach our audience of passive and semi-
10,000 BPSD
active candidates. Charter Memberships are
14,000 BPSD still available.
Condensate Stabilizer
PennEnergyJOBS is owned and operated
6,500 BPSD by PennWell. The choice is simple:
Strategic planning and
development begins with ■ Global industry market reach through 11
BASIC EQUIPMENT intelligent choices… print publications, 16 conferences & events,
Please call: 713-674-7171 7 web sites and 5 eNewsletters
Succeed with Energy Intelligence reports ■ Powered by cutting edge software with
Tommy Balke from Warlick International and the Oil &
Gas Journal Online Research Center advanced matching capabilities
[email protected] ■ Supported by a team of dedicated resources
www.basic-equipment.com with recruitment and job board expertise
North America’s
SURPLUS GAS PROCESSING/REFINING
Forgotten Oil Cache Contact us today for details!
Email: [email protected]
A Marginal Wells Development Guide for
EQUIPMENT E&P, Service Companies and Investors
Coming late October – Always FREE for job seekers.
Order by Oct. 20 - SAVE $380
Post your profile today at:
NGL/LPG PLANTS:10 - 600 MMCFD
North American www.PennEnergyJobs.com
AMINE PLANTS:10 – 2,700 GPM
SULFUR PLANTS:10 - 180 TPD
Unconventional Gas
Charter Members:
COMPRESSION:100 - 20,000 HP
Market Report 2006
Edition 2 now available –
FRACTIONATION:1000 – 25,000 BPD Still the most popular report on
HELIUM RECOVERY:75 & 80 MMCFD Unconventional gas in 2006
We offer engineered surplus equipment solutions.
Download samples of the reports at
Bexar Energy Holdings, Inc. www.warlick.net
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
B M
Tel: (713) 963-6293, Fax: (713) 963-6228, E-mail:
[email protected]. Regional Sales Manager,
Charlene Burman; Tel: (713) 963-6274, Fax: (713) 963-6228;
E-mail: [email protected]
Baker Hughes Meriam Process Technologies ....................... 15
ProductionQuest ...........................Back Cover www.meriam.com
Southwest / Western States www.productionquest.com
1700 West Loop South, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77027;
BCCK Engineering, Inc. ................................. 51
P.O. Box 1941 Houston, TX 77251; Regional Sales Manager;
Marlene Breedlove, Tel: (713) 963-6293, Fax: (713) 963-6228; www.bcck.com
O
E-mail: [email protected] Bechtel ............................................................ 14
www.bechtel.com
Northeast/New England Oil & Gas Journal...............................................33
1700 West Loop South, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77027;
Tel: (713) 963-6244, Fax: (713) 963-6228; Regional Sales www.ogjonline.com
Manager, Charlene Burman; Tel: (713) 963-6274, Fax: (713)
963-6228; E-mail: [email protected].
Mid-Atlantic/Gulf States C
P
1700 West Loop South, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77027; CapRock Communications................................
Tel: (713) 963-6244, Fax: (713) 963-6228; Regional Sales ..........................................Inside Front Cover
Manager, Charlene Burman; Tel: (713) 963-6274, Fax: (713)
www.CapRock.com Petrobras - etroleo Brasleiro S/A ................ 16
963-6228; E-mail: [email protected].
ConocoPhillips ................................................. 2 www.petrobras.com
Midwest/Dallas/Tulsa PennWell
1700 West Loop South, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77027; DryTree & Riser Forum ....................... 47
Tel: (713) 963-6244, Fax: (713) 963-6228; Regional Sales
www.drytreeforum.com
Manager, Charlene Burman; Tel: (713) 963-6274, Fax: (713)
963-6228; E-mail: [email protected]. Independent Operators Forum ........... 55
Essen
Verlagsburo Sicking, Emmastrasse 44, 45130, Essen, I
Germany. Tel: 49 0201 77 98 61, Fax: 49 0201 781 741; E-mail:
[email protected]. Wilhelm F. Sicking, Germany,
Austria, Denmark, Northern Switzerland, Eastern Europe,
Industrial Rubber, Inc. .................................. 12
www.iri-oiltool.com
T
Tenaris ........................................................... 37
Russia, Former Soviet Union. Invensys Sim-Sci-Esscor.................................. 4 www.ogclearinghouse.com
The Oil & Gas Asset Clearinghouse ............. 13
Tokyo www.ogclearinghouse.com
e. x. press Co., Ltd., Hirakawacho TEC Building, 2-11-
11, Hirakawa-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0093, Japan, Total Compression ........................................ 14
Telephone: 81 3 3556 1575, Fax: 81 3 3556 1576; E-mail: www.totalcompression.com
[email protected]; Manami Konishi Turck, Inc. ..................................................... 27
Brazil K www.turck.com/process
Grupo Expetro/Smartpetro, Att: Jean-Paul Prates and KBC ....................................... Inside Back Cover
Bernardo Grunewald, Directors, Ave. Erasmo Braga 22710th www.kbcat.com
and 11th floors Rio de Janeiro RJ 20024-900 BRAZIL;
Telephone: (55-21) 3084 5384, Fax: (55-21) 2533 4593; E-mail:
[email protected] and [email protected]
Singapore
Singapore, Australia, Asia Pacific, 19 Tanglin Road #09-07,
Tanglin Shopping Center, Singapore 247909, Republic of
L W
Singapore; Telephone: (65) 6 737-2356, Fax: (65) 6 734-0655; 13 Days: The Pythagoras Conspiracy ............ 15 Weatherford International Ltd. ...................... 7
Michael Yee, E-mail: [email protected] http://lastarkbooks.com www.weatherford.com
India
Interads Limited, 2, Padmini Enclave, Hauz Khas,
New Delhi-110 016, India; Tel: +91-11-6283018/19, Fax: +91-
11-6228928; E-mail: [email protected]. Mr. Rajan
Sharma.
Italy
Jean-Pierre Bruel, sas di Jean-Pierre Bruel, Via Trieste This index is provided as a service. The publisher does not assume any liability for errors or omission.
17-22066, Mariano Commense (Co), Italy; Tel: 39-031-51494,
Fax: 39-031-751482; E-mail: [email protected]
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
}ÊÊÌ iÊÃÃ}Ê*iViÃ
*iÌÀ-Ê ÃÊ Ì iÊ VÀiÀÃÌiÊ vÊ Ê *Àv>ÌVÃÊ -Ê -ÕÌi]Ê >Ê V«Ài iÃÛi]Ê Ìi}À>Ìi`Ê ÃiÌÊ vÊ
ÃvÌÜ>ÀiÊvÀÊ«ÀvÌÊ«ÀÛiḭÊ*iÌÀ-ÊÃÊ>ÊÀ}ÀÕÃ]ÊvÕvi>ÌÕÀi`Ê«ÀViÃÃÊÃÕ>ÌÀÊÌ >ÌÊV>Ê
>VVÕÀ>ÌiÞÊ`iÊiÞÊ«ÀViÃÃiÃÊÃÕV Ê>Ã\
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F
With limited manpower, how best can you effectively verify crucial chemical treatment on
wells spread out over hundreds of miles?
ProductionQuest Chemical Automation gives you the ability to look after your chemical
treatment program via the internet using remote SCADA and satellite communications
technology. Our systems enable you to remotely monitor tank levels and production
processes, while controlling and monitoring chemical injection. Our e-business tools for
For more information visit our website www.bakerhughes.com
_________
© 2006 Baker Hughes Inc. All rights reserved. PQ-06-10844
chemical management effortlessly assure the right chemicals are available when you need
them. The results: remote production monitoring, reliable flow assurance and corrosion
protection, cost effective chemical inventory management, and reduced HS&E exposure.
To learn more, visit www.productionquest.com or email [email protected]
P r o d u c t i o n O p t i m i z a t i o n i n A c t i o n
OIL&GAS Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page EMaGS A
JOURNAL B F