0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Russian Method N

The document presents a comparative analysis of various entities (A to K) based on their performance across multiple quality indicators (Q1 to Q12) and complex characteristics (Ki to Ei). Each entity is assigned a quality index and rank, with entity E achieving the highest quality index of 0.98698 and rank 1. The data highlights the relative strengths and weaknesses of each entity in terms of their performance metrics.

Uploaded by

dfuiddyygfdhh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Russian Method N

The document presents a comparative analysis of various entities (A to K) based on their performance across multiple quality indicators (Q1 to Q12) and complex characteristics (Ki to Ei). Each entity is assigned a quality index and rank, with entity E achieving the highest quality index of 0.98698 and rank 1. The data highlights the relative strengths and weaknesses of each entity in terms of their performance metrics.

Uploaded by

dfuiddyygfdhh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Russian method

Relative characteristies

NO Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Quality Rank


index
(Q.I)
A .6769 .7391 .8140 .8100 .8556 .8040 0.75 0.7778 0.7778 1 0.7500 0.7778 0.7981 10

B .9923 .9420 .9612 .9300 .9556 1 0.8750 1 1 1 1 1 0.9722 2

C .6000 .7464 .7064 .6900 .7778 .7416 0.7500 1 0.8889 1 0.7500 0.8889 0.80339 9

D .5462 .6377 .5581 .9400 .7111 .8315 0.7500 0.8889 1 1 0.7500 0.8889 0.80391 8

E 1 1 1 1 1 .9663 1 1 1 1 0.8750 1 0.98698 1

F .7461 .7971 .6822 0.9500 .6889 .8315 0.8750 0.8889 1 1 0.7500 0.8889 0.84947 7

G .7310 .9855 .7674 .9700 .8111 .9101 0.8750 1 1 1 0.8750 1 0.91697 3

H .7615 .7101 .9302 .8600 .7000 .7978 0.8750 0.8889 1 1 0.8750 0.8889 0.8629 5

I .5692 .8478 .6744 .6000 .6111 .7640 0.7500 0.6667 0.7778 0.8889 0.7500 0.6667 0.7181 11

J .6846 .8478 .7752 .9800 .9778 .8652 0.8750 1 1 1 0.8750 1 0.91367 4

K .7538 .7174 .6977 .9800 .7444 .7978 0.8750 0.8889 1 0.8889 0.8750 1 0.8582 6

GM .7198 .8076 .7679 .8725 .7934 .8433 0.8374 0.9026 0.9452 0.9788 0.8258 0.9026 Total=
10.196
86
Wt .0706 .0792 .0753 .0856 .0778 .0827 0.0821 0.0885 0.0927 0.0960 0.0810 0.0885 Total=1
Complex
characteristics

Rank
NO Ki Gi Hi Si Ei K G H S E X’
A 0.7981 0.7946 0.7913 1.8927 0.0665 10 9 8 9 10 9.2

B 0.9722 0.9714 0.9706 2.8301 0.08105 2 2 2 2 2 2

C 0.80339 0.7948 0.7863 1.9025 0.06707 9 8 9 8 9 8.6

D 0.80391 0.7889 0.7730 1.8924 0.06716 8 10 10 10 8 9.2

E 0.98698 0.98644 0.98575 2.9206 0.08228 1 1 1 1 1 1

F 0.84947 0.84266 0.8357 2.1219 0.07089 7 7 7 7 7 7

G 0.91697 0.91239 0.90727 2.4745 0.07653 3 3 3 3 3 3

H 0.8629 0.85747 0.8519 2.2140 0.07198 5 5 5 5 5 5

I 0.7181 0.71169 0.70548 1.5304 0.05989 11 11 11 11 11 11

J 0.91367 0.90825 0.90230 2.4670 0.07624 4 4 4 4 4 4

K 0.8582 0.85193 0.84554 2.1771 0.07161 6 6 6 6 6 6

You might also like