1
Techniques and Tools for Strategic Management in Health Care
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Professor
Date
2
Part 1
The connection between healthcare regulation compliance and quality management is
thus highly likely to be of paramount importance. The laws and regulations that are set serve a
dual purpose. First, they are meant to make patients safe by providing guidelines that these
providers must follow. The regulations also look to make sure that the quality of health is of the
same standard through areas like medication management, infection control, documentation, and
care protocols (Hughes, 2018). Quality management programs that are successful bring an ability
to establish, apply, and proctor the systematic processes as well as the tools for monitoring,
controlling, and improving the performance to the end that the organizations meet the regulatory
needs.
3
A few particularly effective quality tools are control charts and fishbone diagrams (cause
and effect diagrams). Control charts reveal quality indicators such as type errors or waiting times
on a timeline and their statistical confines show where chance variations are expected. Any given
data points falling outside of these limits, indicate a change and may point to a tendency that
could develop into a deviation from the set limits (Morrison, 2008). For example, control charts
may be developed which will keep an eye on medication administration error rates and compare
them to the maximum threshold that have been envisaged by quality improvement organizations
such as the Joint Commission.
The fishbone mapping method, derived from the fishbone diagrams, is a strong technique
that is used to identify the root causes of quality issues. It is a tool that enables them to highlight
the causes of the problem which are divided into groups of Categories such as personnel,
equipment, environment, and processes (Sakdiyah et al., 2022). With this well-structured
method, the owner of the process can expose the sources of these problems and breakthroughs in
infection prevention protocols, documentation regulation, or other aspects of care.
The tools that form this ingredient, in turn, allow for a preventative mode of tracking
indicators for new threats, in addition to the existence of a sturdy process for tracking down
issues and handling them through data-driven actions. This also coincides with the two elemental
4
quality management concepts of continuous improvement and prevention of defects rather than
correction of defects.
Part 2
Technique Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Use in Compliance and
Performance Improvement
Dashboards Training Completion Rates, Clinician Real-time KPI tracking, proactive
Productivity, Patient Throughput, risk management, identification
Documentation Accuracy, Compliance of trends, facilitates immediate
with Regulatory Standards corrective actions
Productivity Clinician Productivity, Patient Identifies performance gaps,
Benchmarking Throughput, Compliance with informs training and staffing
Regulatory Standards interventions, ensures continuous
improvement
Performance management and tracking are an essential part of any major transition such
as the EHR implementation. It will help in the minimization of disruptions and high-quality care
with full compliance with the regulations. Two techniques which are the use of dashboards and
implementing productivity benchmarking standards leading to these techniques being effective.
Dashboards provide the ability to see at a glance data analysis of various sources systems
through charts, and tables with their integration (Mingo Smart Factory, 2024). Completing the
training, documenting the schedules, improving the productivity of the clinicians, and moving
more patients throughout the systems are some of the KPIs that can be shown on the dashboards
for the EHR transition. By the platform allowing you to track metrics about risk or regulatory
trends, you could spot emerging risks or a bad trend that could undermine your operations.
A main tool of productivity measurement is benchmarking standards that set performance
limits on an organization’s basement data or industry data level (World Bank, n.d.). The standard
measurement of the healthcare metrics is the efficiency with which the physicians process
patients per day. A decline in productivity during the EHR transition to levels lower than
5
satisfactory reveals the problem of inadequate training or usability issues with the system and a
lack of workers that require immediate intervention.
Apart from external benchmarks, internal benchmarks are also an important source of
social comparison. While internal benchmarking uncovers unwarranted performance differences
within departments that can be used as examples of success to copy or trouble spots that need
assistance, comparisons with external competitors present challenges in terms of fiscal
investment and uniqueness of offerings. External benchmarking lets an organization know how
well they are doing in comparison with their peers. It is through the building of partnerships that
they will be able to identify which areas of competitive edge fall short of the industry’s
outshining benchmark.
With the metrics dashboard and benchmarked product targets getting integrated in a well-
balanced manner, overall performance management can be done in a data-driven manner that is
proactive. through fostering transparency in real-time, cultivated by analytics software,
organizations can identify emerging risks, for which prompt action is needed to avoid damaging
the quality of care, operations, or compliance.
Part 3
To facilitate the adoption of workflows and enforce conformance to the policies while
moving from a standard EHR to a new one, it is imperative to employ use case diagrams and
process maps early in the implementation lifecycle.
6
Through the use case diagrams it is easy to represent how different user roles such as
nurses, physicians, and administrators will be interacting with the EHR system. In the meantime,
it is possible to identify their assigned tasks and activities. This is having all roles indicate
system requirements from their perspectives - determination of what data, documentation, and
order entry capabilities they require by their roles and responsibilities. Use cases take priority
and allow you to customize settings as there is a need and make them flexible enough to match
any personnel.
Wider application, case studies help users of the EHR to suggest the process redesign by
spotlighting the avenues for standardization and improvement of previous workflows
incorporating the EHR's advanced features. This collaborative redesign project has an aim which
is the optimization of all the processes as well as embedding the compliance rules through the
capabilities like the order set validation, clinical decision support tools, robust identity/access
management controls, and many others (Zheng et al., 2020).
7
On the one hand, a process-mapping diagram illustrates every step in the workflow
sequence from the entrance of the patient to the surfacing of gaps in compliance as is shown on a
slide. In this manner, holes may entail the mistake of failing to perform the given set of
necessary documentation lies, absence of identity controls which possibly creates gaps in data,
and other issues.
8
Aided by the understanding of present limitations, stakeholders will be able to leverage
innovative process design that is EHR-centric in the next phases of the system. Involving the use
of automation, decision support, and different controls makes the process of reengineering
workflows to harden regulatory compliance go virtually unnoticed. A well-structured analysis
and redesign project applying this framework will help to mitigate the risks resulting from non-
compliance by precisely tailoring it to the capabilities of EHR.
Part 4
The work on expanding the use of EHRs on a large scale brings forward the issues of
program and project management properly, as it is needed to make sure that the operations are
done in a synchronized manner, and the objectives are fulfilled. Time management is a major
aspect, for which a Gantt chart should be used (Project Management Institute, 2021). Moreover,
it is important not to overlook the possibility of risks.
Gantt chart is an example of bar charts that schedule projects, with bars as a
representation of each task having dates of each start/end and the duration of the respective task
with dependencies. SGs for EHR implementation include tasks related to assessing the current
workflow and system configuration, migration activities, integration testing, updating the
policies and processes, and change management across the whole organization.
9
This thoroughly integrated, interdependent schedule defines roles precisely, provides
prerequisites, and enforces handoffs and the like to ensure not a missed step nor a handoff that
might disrupt the process. The critical path determines priority and showcases how activities are
dependent on each other. Feel free to use thought-provoking questions, additional explanations,
and relevant examples to inspire and challenge the audience. A structured schedule brings about
a reduction of operational risks, such as delinquent claims processing, filing errors, or erroneous
documentation. Also, it is aided in keeping payer requisites, documentation standards, and
clinical protocols aligned.
Gantt charts go along with an orderly process, while the risk analysis points out the
problems that can arise in the course of project implementation. The risk register, which is a
process that analyzes certain probabilities and impacts, like the quality of data, insufficient staff,
or technical capabilities of the systems, is created by this process. Risks that are bigger than the
desired risk capacity of the organization may have mitigation plans that will help to spare or
reduce the effects (Project Management Institute, 2021).
In the case of EMR implementations, high-priority risks mainly include inadequate
training, no leadership alignment or end-user buy-in, and vendor/supplier under-delivery. Any
one of the cases can have a major impact on the integrity of the operations as well as regulation
compliance if realized. Adopting tools like Gantt charts for scheduling that are structured along
the overall lifetime of the transition process is one of the ways healthcare organizations can keep
track of what is going on throughout the entire stage. This focused approach results in the EHR
employers' utilization and sustains the clinical, financial, and compliance skills required in the
whole transformation.
10
References
Hughes, R. (2018, April). Tools and Strategies for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.
National Library of Medicine; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2682/
Mingo Smart Factory . (2024). The Benefits of a Manufacturing Dashboard. Mingo Smart
Factory. https://www.mingosmartfactory.com/benefits-manufacturing-dashboard/
Morrison, L. W. (2008). The Use of Control Charts to Interpret Environmental Monitoring Data.
Natural Areas Journal, 28(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-
8608(2008)28[66:tuocct]2.0.co;2
Project Management Institute. (2021). PMBOK® Guide. Pmi.org. https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-
guide-standards/foundational/pmbok
Sakdiyah, S. H., Eltivia, N., & Afandi, A. (2022). Root Cause Analysis Using Fishbone
Diagram: Company Management Decision Making. Journal of Applied Business,
Taxation and Economics Research, 1(6), 566–576.
https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.103
World Bank. (n.d.). Performance Monitoring Indicators A handbook for task managers.
https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/training/capacity-building-resources/basic-
me-concepts-portuguese/indicators.pdf
Zheng, K., Ratwani, R. M., & Adler-Milstein, J. (2020). Studying Workflow and Workarounds
in Electronic Health Record–Supported Work to Improve Health System Performance.
Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(11), S116–S122. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-0871