PMES Tool for

Master Teachers I-IV

(Highly Proficient Teachers)
S.Y. 2024-2025

PMES 1
Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient Teachers
 KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. Modeled Classroom Observation Tool Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
effective (COT) rating sheet/s done through Level 8 in Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
applications of onsite / face-to-face / in- person Objective 1 Objective 1 Objective 1 Objective 1 Objective 1
content classroom observation. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
knowledge within COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating
and across If onsite / face-to-face / in-person Quality sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets /
curriculum classes are not implemented, inter- inter- inter- inter- inter-
teaching areas. 1. through observation of observer observer observer observer observer
(PPST 1.1.3) synchronous / agreement agreement agreement agreement agreement
asynchronous teaching in forms forms forms forms forms
other modalities; or
2. through observation or
of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC No
session. acceptable
evidence
and proof of attendance of was shown
colleague/s Objective Objective was No
was met met but acceptable
Efficiency within the instruction evidence
allotted time exceeded the was shown
allotted time
* The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Notes in case of two (2) full-period classroom observations:

1. In computing the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding PMES 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii) calculate the average of the PMES ratings; and (iii) find the
transmuted PMES rating. See sample computation below:
Means of Verification COT PMES 5-point Average PMES Rating for PMES Rating Transmutation Table
Rating Scale Rating Quality
COT Rating Sheet 1 7 4 3.500 4 Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
COT Rating Sheet 2 6 3 (Very Satisfactory) Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499
2. In computing the rating for Efficiency: (i) rate the Efficiency by referring to the rubric above; (ii) compute the final rating by averaging t he Efficiency ratings from the
two (2) full-period classroom observations. The average rating shall be categorized using the Efficiency Range Table below:

Page 2 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Range of Average Efficiency Final Rating
4.00-5.00 5
2.00-3.99 3
1.00-1.99 1

Page 3 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
2. Collaborated with 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided Synthesized Collaborated Attended coaching No acceptable
colleagues in the coaching and mentoring colleagues in discussions with with colleagues and mentoring evidence was
conduct and sessions/meetings/LAC planning for the colleagues on the in the conduct sessions/ shown
application of sessions conduct and conduct and and meetings/LAC
research to enrich / FGDs / other collegial application of application of application of sessions / FGDs /
discussions that highlights the research to research to research to other collegial
knowledge of content
objective enrich enrich enrich discussions that
and pedagogy. Quality knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of apply research
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching
(PPST 1.2.3) and mentoring content and content and content and to enrich
sessions/meetings / FGDs / pedagogy during pedagogy pedagogy knowledge of
other collegial discussions that during during
highlights the objective meetings/LAC
3. Reflection notes of teachers on meetings/LAC meetings/LAC sessions / FGDs / content and
the coaching and sessions / FGDs / sessions / FGDs / other collegial pedagogy, as
mentoring other collegial other collegial discussions, as shown in MOV 1
sessions/meetings/LAC discussions, as discussions, as shown in MOV 2
sessions / FGDs/other collegial shown in MOV 4 shown in MOV
discussions that highlights 3
the objective with proof/s of
attendance
4. Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations
highlighting the
objective

Page 4 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
3. Promoted Classroom Observation Tool (COT) Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
effective strategies rating sheet/s done through Level 8 in Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
in the positive use of onsite / face-to-face / in-person Objective 2 Objective 2 Objective 2 Objective 2 Objective 2
ICT to facilitate the classroom observation. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
teaching and COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating
learning process. If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets /
(PPST 1.3.3) are not implemented, Quality inter- inter- inter- inter- inter-
1. through observation of observer observer observer observer observer
synchronous / agreement agreement agreement agreement agreement
asynchronous teaching in forms forms forms forms forms
other modalities; or
2. through observation or
of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC No
session. acceptable
evidence
and proof of attendance of was shown
colleague/s Objective Objective was No
was met met but acceptable
Efficiency within the instruction evidence
allotted time exceeded the was shown
allotted
time
* The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 5 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
4. Evaluated with 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided Synthesized Evaluated with Attended coaching No acceptable
colleagues the coaching and mentoring colleagues in discussions with colleagues the and mentoring evidence was
effectiveness of sessions/meetings/LAC sessions planning for the colleagues on the effectiveness of sessions/ shown
teaching strategies / FGDs / other collegial evaluation of theevaluation of teaching meetings/LAC
discussions that highlights strategies
that promote learner effectiveness of effectiveness of that promote sessions / FGDs /
the objective learner
achievement in 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching teaching teaching achievement in other collegial
literacy and and mentoring strategies that strategies that literacy and discussions that
numeracy. sessions/meetings / FGDs / promote promote numeracy evaluate
other collegial discussions that Quality
(PPST 1.4.3) learner learner during effectiveness of
highlights the objective achievement in achievement in meetings/LAC
3. Reflection notes of teachers on literacy and literacy and sessions / FGDs / teaching
the coaching and strategies
mentoring numeracy numeracy other collegial that promote
sessions/meetings/LAC during during learner
sessions / FGDs/other collegial meetings/LAC meetings/LAC discussions, as achievement in
sessions / FGDs / sessions / FGDs / shown in MOV 2 literacy and
discussions that highlights
other collegial other collegial numeracy, as
the objective with proof/s of
discussions, discussions, shown in MOV 1
attendance as shown in as shown in
4. Performance Monitoring MOV 4 MOV 3
and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with
annotations
highlighting the
objective

Page 6 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
5. Displayed a wide Classroom Observation Tool Demonstrated Demonstrate Demonstrate Demonstrate Demonstrate
range of effective (COT) rating sheet/s done Level 8 in d d d d
verbal and non-verbal through onsite / face-to-face / in- Objective 5 Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
classroom person classroom observation. as shown in Objective 5 Objective 5 Objective 5 Objective 5
communication COT rating as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
strategies to support If onsite / face-to-face / in-person sheets / COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating
learner classes are not implemented, inter- sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets /
understanding, Quality
1. through observation of observer inter- inter- inter- inter-
participation, synchronous / agreement observer observer observer observer
engagement and asynchronous teaching in forms agreement agreement agreement agreement
achievement. other modalities; or forms forms forms forms
(PPST 1.7.3) 2. through observation of
a demonstration or
teaching* via LAC
session. No acceptable
evidence was
and proof of attendance of shown
colleague/s Objective Objective No
was met was met acceptable
Efficiency within the but evidence
allotted time instruction was shown
exceeded
the
allotted time
* The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process (e.g., done in modular approach). The supplementary material to the MOV obtained through option 3 shall
also be accompanied * The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Page 7 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
6. Worked with 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided colleagues Synthesized Shared with Attended No
colleagues to share coaching and mentoring in planning of discussions with colleagues coaching and acceptable
successful strategies sessions/meetings/LAC successful colleagues on successful mentoring evidence
that sustain supportive sessions strategies successful strategies sessions/ was shown
learning environments / FGDs / other collegial that sustain strategies that sustain meetings/LAC
that nurture and inspire discussions that highlights the supportive that sustain supportive sessions / FGDs
learners to participate, objective learning supportive learning / other collegial
cooperate and 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching environments learning environments discussions that
collaborate in and mentoring that nurture and environments that nurture discuss
continued learning. sessions/meetings / FGDs / inspire learners that nurture and inspire successful
(PPST 2.4.3) other collegial discussions that to participate, and inspire learners to strategies
Quality
highlights the objective cooperate learners to participate, that sustain
3. Reflection notes of teachers on and participate, cooperate supportive
the coaching and collaborate in cooperate and learning
mentoring continued and collaborate environments
sessions/meetings/LAC learning during collaborate in in continued that nurture
sessions / FGDs/other collegial meetings/LAC continued learning and inspire
discussions that highlights sessions / FGDs learning during during learners to
the objective with proof/s of / other meetings/LAC meetings/LA participate,
attendance collegial sessions / FGDs C sessions / cooperate
4. Performance Monitoring discussions, / other FGDs / other and
and Coaching Form as shown in collegial collegial collaborate in
(PMCF), with MOV 4 discussions, discussions, continued
annotations as shown in as shown in learning, as
highlighting the MOV 3 MOV 2 shown in MOV
objective 1

Page 8 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
7. Modeled successful Classroom Observation Tool Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
strategies and supported (COT) rating sheet/s done through Level 8 in Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
colleagues in promoting onsite / face-to-face / in- person Objective 8 Objective 8 Objective 8 Objective 8 Objective 8
learning environments classroom observation. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
that effectively motivate COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating COT rating
learners to work If onsite / face-to-face / in-person classes sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets / sheets /
productively by are not implemented, Quality inter- inter- inter- inter- inter-
assuming responsibility 1. through observation of observer observer observer observer observer
for their own learning. synchronous / agreement agreement agreement agreement agreement
(PPST 2.5.3) asynchronous teaching in forms forms forms forms forms
other modalities; or
2. through observation of a or
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session. No
acceptable
and proof of attendance of evidence was
colleague/s shown
Objective was Objective No
met within the was met acceptable
Efficiency allotted time but evidence was
instruction shown
exceeded
the
allotted time
* The demonstration teaching must always reflect the teaching-learning process.

Notes in case of two (2) full-period classroom observations:

1. In computing the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding PMES 5-point scale rating of each COT rating; (ii) calculate the average of the PMES ratings; and (iii) find the
transmuted PMES rating. See sample computation below:
Means of Verification COT PMES 5-point Average PMES Rating for PMES Rating Transmutation Table
Rating Scale Rating Quality
COT Rating Sheet 1 7 4 3.500 4 Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
COT Rating Sheet 2 6 3 (Very Satisfactory) Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499
2. In computing the rating for Efficiency: (i) rate the Efficiency by referring to the rubric above; (ii) compute the final rating by averaging the Efficiency ratings from the
two (2) full-period classroom observations. The average rating shall be categorized using the Efficiency Range Table below:

Page 9 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 2: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy & Learning Environment
Range of Average Efficiency Final Rating
4.00-5.00 5
2.00-3.99 3
1.00-1.99 1

Page 10 of
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient 19
Teachers
 KRA 3: Diversity of Learners & Curriculum and
Planning PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
8. Assisted colleagues to 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided colleagues Synthesized Assisted Attended No acceptable
design, adapt and coaching and in planning for discussions with colleagues in coaching and evidence was
mentoring the
implement teaching sessions/meetings/LA design, colleagues on the designing, mentoring shown
adaptation
C sessions / FGDs /
strategies that are and design, adapting and sessions/
other collegial implementation adaptation
responsive to learners discussions that of teaching and implementing meetings/LAC
with disabilities, highlights the strategies that implementation teaching sessions / FGDs
objective are of
giftedness and talents. 2. Minutes/Notes of responsive to teaching strategies that are / other collegial
(PPST 3.3.3) coaching and learners with strategies that responsive to discussions on
mentoring are
sessions/meetings / disabilities, responsive to learners with the design,
FGDs / other collegial Quality giftedness and learners with disabilities, adaptation and
talents during disabilities, giftedness and implementation
discussions that
of
highlights the meetings/LAC giftedness and talents during teaching
objective sessions / FGDs / talents during meetings/LAC strategies that are
3. Reflection notes of teachers other collegial meetings/LAC sessions / FGDs / responsive to
on the coaching and discussions, as sessions / FGDs / other collegial learners with
mentoring shown in MOV 4 other collegial discussions, as disabilities,
sessions/meetings/LA discussions, as shown in MOV 2 giftedness and
C sessions / shown in MOV talents, as
FGDs/other collegial 3 shown in MOV
discussions that 1
highlights the objective
with proof/s of
attendance
4. Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with
annotations
highlighting the objective

Page 11 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 3: Diversity of Learners & Curriculum and
Planning PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
9. Evaluated with 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided colleagues Synthesized Evaluated with Attended No
colleagues teaching coaching and in planning for discussions with colleagues the coaching and acceptable
strategies that are mentoring the evaluation colleagues on the effectiveness mentoring evidence
responsive to the sessions/meetings/LA the evaluation of of teaching sessions/ was shown
special educational C sessions / FGDs / effectiveness effectiveness strategies meetings/LAC
other collegial of teaching of teaching that are sessions / FGDs
needs of learners in
discussions that strategies that strategies that responsive / other collegial
difficult circumstances, are responsive are responsive to the discussions that
highlights the
including: geographic objective to the special to the special special evaluate
isolation; chronic 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and Quality education needs education education effectiveness
illness; displacement mentoring of learners in needs of needs of of teaching
due to armed conflict, sessions/meetings / difficult learners in learners in strategies that
urban resettlement or FGDs / other collegial circumstances difficult difficult are responsive
disasters; child abuse discussions that highlights during circumstance circumstance to the special
and child labor the objective meetings/LAC s during s during education
practices. 3. Reflection notes of teachers sessions / FGDs meetings/LA meetings/LA needs of
(PPST 3.4.3) on the coaching and / other C sessions / C sessions / learners in
mentoring collegial FGDs / other FGDs difficult
sessions/meetings/LAC discussions, collegial / other circumstance
sessions / FGDs/other as shown in discussions, collegial s
collegial discussions that MOV 4 as shown in discussions, and numeracy, as
highlights the objective MOV 3 as shown in shown in MOV 1
with proof/s of MOV 2
attendance
4. Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations
highlighting the objective

Page 12 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 3: Diversity of Learners & Curriculum and
Planning PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
10. Worked collaboratively 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided Synthesized Evaluated with Attended No acceptable
with colleagues to evaluate coaching and colleagues in discussions with colleagues the coaching and evidence was
the design of learning mentoring planning for colleagues on the design of mentoring shown
programs that develop the the evaluation of learning sessions/
sessions/meetings/LA
knowledge and skills
C sessions / FGDs / evaluation of the design of programs meetings/LAC
of learners at different
ability levels. other collegial design of learning that develop sessions / FGDs
(PPST 4.3.3) discussions that learning programs that the / other collegial
highlights the programs develop the knowledge discussions
objective that develop knowledge and and skills of that
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and the learners
mentoring knowledge and at different
sessions/meetings / ability
FGDs / other collegial Quality skills of learners skills of levels during evaluate the
learners
discussions that highlights at different at different meetings/LAC design of learning
the objective ability ability
3. Reflection notes of teachers levels during levels during sessions / FGDs / programs that
on the coaching and meetings/LAC meetings/LAC other collegial develop the
mentoring sessions / FGDs / sessions / FGDs / discussions, as knowledge and
sessions/meetings/LAC other collegial other collegial shown in MOV 2 skills of learners
sessions / FGDs/other discussions, as discussions, as at different
collegial discussions that ability
highlights the objective shown in MOV 4 shown in MOV levels, as
with proof/s of 3 shown in
MOV 1
attendance
4. Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations
highlighting the objective

Page 13 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
11. Reflected on and 1. Synthesis of evaluation of Synthesized the Consulted Conducted Conducted a No acceptable
evaluated learning a program / project / evaluations from parents, coaching and survey to gather evidence was
environments that are activity that maintains the wider school guardians, mentoring feedback on shown
responsive to community the learning community of and/or other sessions/ programs,
environment the
contexts. programs, external meetings/LAC projects, and/or
responsive to
(PPST 6.1.3) projects, stakeholders on sessions / FGDs activities that are
community contexts and/or
2. Minutes of consultative activities that programs, / other collegial responsive to
meeting with parents / maintain the projects, and/or discussions with community
other external learning activities that colleagues on contexts as
stakeholders on environment maintain the programs, evidenced by
programs, projects, responsive to learning projects, MOV 4
and/or activities that Quality community environments and/or
maintain a learning activities that
environment, highlighting context as responsive to maintain the
the evaluations made, evidenced by community learning
with proof of attendance MOV 1 context to reflect environments
3. Minutes of focus group on and evaluate responsive to
discussion (FGD) with them as community
teachers on a program / evidenced by context to
reflect
project MOV 2 on and
/ activity that maintains a evaluate
learning environment, them as
highlighting the evaluations evidenced by
made, with proof of MOV 3
attendance
4. Survey on programs / projects
/activities that maintain a
learning environment

Page 14 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
12. Discussed with 1. Proof/s of attendance in Guided Synthesized Evaluated with Attended coaching No acceptable
colleagues teaching and coaching and mentoring colleagues in discussions with colleagues the and mentoring evidence was
learning practices that sessions/meetings/LAC sessions planning for colleagues on the teaching and sessions/ shown
apply existing codes, / FGDs / other collegial meetings/LAC teaching and learning meetings/LAC
discussions that highlights practices
laws and regulations that sessions / FGDs / learning that apply existing sessions / FGDs /
the objective practices
apply to the teaching 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching other collegial that apply codes, law and other collegial
and mentoring existing
profession, and the sessions/meetings / FGDs / discussions to codes, law and regulations discussions that
other collegial discussions that Quality
responsibilities specified discuss regulations during discuss
highlights the objective teaching during meetings/LAC teaching
in the Code of Ethics for 3. Reflection notes of teachers on and learning meetings/LAC sessions / FGDs / and learning
Professional Teachers. the coaching and practices that sessions / FGDs / other collegial practices that
mentoring apply
(PPST 6.3.3) sessions/meetings/LAC apply existing other collegial discussions, as existing codes,
law
sessions / FGDs/other collegial
codes, law and discussions, as shown in MOV 2 and regulations,
discussions that highlights as
the objective with proof/s of regulations, as shown in MOV shown in MOV 1
attendance shown in MOV 4 3
4. Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form (PMCF), with
annotations highlighting
the
objective

Page 15 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
13. Exhibited 1. Evaluation report on the Evaluated with Conducted Discussed with Implemented No acceptable
commitment to and implementation of school teachers the discussions with teachers certain school policies and evidence was
supported teachers in policies implementation teachers on the school policies procedures as shown
/ procedures or minutes of of
the implementation of subject area / grade level certain school progress of and procedures evidenced by MOV
school policies and meetings or professional policies and implementation for uniform 4
procedures to foster Quality procedures as of certain school implementation
meetings on evaluating school
harmonious evidenced by policies and as evidenced by
policies/procedures
relationships with MOV 1 procedures as MOV 3
learners, parents and 2. Minutes of subject area / evidenced by
other stakeholders. grade level meetings or MOV 2
(PPST 6.4.3) professional meetings on
the implementation
progress of school
policies / procedures
[provide at least 2 to show
discussions held]
3. Minutes of subject area /
grade level meeting or
professional meeting on
disseminating
information and
implementing school
policies / procedures
[provide at least 2 to
show discussions
held]
4. Proof of implementation of
school policies and
procedures

Page 16 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 5: Personal Growth and Professional Development
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
OBJECTIVE MEANS OF VERIFICATION Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
14. Identified and utilized 1. IPCRF-DP Identified and Identified and Identified and Identified No
personal professional 2. A reflection/journal entry that utilized personal utilized utilized personal personal acceptable
strengths to uphold the highlights practices that professional personal professional professional evidence
dignity of teaching as a uphold the dignity of strengths to professional strengths to strengths was shown
profession to help build a teaching as a profession uphold the strengths to uphold the that uphold the
positive teaching and 3. Annotated evidence of dignity of uphold the dignity of dignity of
learning culture within the practice, including but teaching as a dignity of teaching as a teaching as a
school. not limited to the profession to teaching as a profession to profession as
Quality
(PPST 7.2.3) following: help build a profession to help build a evidenced
 Documented feedback positive help build a positive by MOV 1
from superiors, teaching and positive teaching and
colleagues, or other learning teaching and learning
stakeholders culture beyond learning culture within
directly reflecting the school culture within the learning
the ratee’s good / Community the school area/department
practices that uphold Learning Center / Community as evidenced
the dignity of (CLC) as Learning Center by MOV 2
teaching as a evidenced by (CLC) as
profession MOV 3 evidenced
 Remarks from by MOV 3
superiors,
colleagues, or
master teacher /
school head about
one’s qualities (e.g.,
entries in
Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
[PMCF] or in Mid-
Year Review
Form)
 Recognition from
the school / school
community about
Page 17 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 KRA 5: Personal Growth and Professional Development
one’s qualities
4. Others (please specify)

Page 18 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers
 SUMMARY
Objective COI MOVs / Proof of Demonstration of Objectives No. of MOVs
/
NCOI
Obj. 1 (PPST 1.1.3) COI Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-face / in-person 1 or 2
Obj. 3 (PPST 1.3.3) COI
Obj. 5 (PPST 1.7.3) COI classroom observation and proof of attendance of colleague/s
Obj. 7 (PPST 2.5.3) COI

Obj. 2 (PPST 1.2.3) NCOI At least one (1) of the following that highlights the objectives: 1
Obj. 4 (PPST 1.4.3) NCOI  Proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions that highlights
Obj. 6 (PPST 2.4.3) NCOI the objective
Obj. 8 (PPST 3.3.3) NCOI  Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring sessions/ meetings/ FGDs/ other collegial discussions that highlights the objective
Obj. 9 (PPST 3.4.3) NCOI  Reflection notes of teachers on the coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/ FGDs/ other collegial discussions
Obj. 10 (PPST 4.3.3) NCOI that highlights the objective with proof/s of attendance
Obj. 12 (PPST 6.3.3) NCOI  Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form (PMCF), with annotations highlighting the objective
Obj. 11 (PPST 6.1.3) NCOI Any one (1) of the following: 1
 Synthesis of evaluation of a program / project / activity that maintains the learning environment responsive to community
contexts
 Minutes of consultative meeting with parents / other external stakeholders on programs, projects, and/or activities that
maintain a learning environment, highlighting the evaluations made, with proof of attendance
 Minutes of focus group discussion (FGD) with teachers on a program / project / activity that maintains a learning environment,
highlighting the evaluations made, with proof of attendance
 Survey on programs/ projects / activities that maintain a learning environment

Obj. 13 (PPST 6.4.3) NCOI Any one (1) of the following: 1

 Evaluation report on the implementation of school policies/ procedures or minutes of subject area / grade level meetings or
professional meetings on evaluating school policies/procedures
 Minutes of subject area/grade level meetings on the implementation progress of school policies/ procedures
 Minutes of subject area/grade level meeting or professional meeting on disseminating information and implementing school poli
cies/ procedures
 Proof of implementation of school policies and procedures
Obj. 14 (PPST 7.2.3) NCOI Any one (1) of the following: 1
 IPCRF-DP
 A reflection/journal entry that highlights practices that uphold the dignity of teaching as a profession
 Annotated evidence of practice, including but not limited to the following:
o Documented feedback from superiors, colleagues, or other stakeholders directly reflecting the ratee’s good practices that
uphold the dignity of teaching as a profession
o Remarks from superiors, colleagues, or master teacher / school head
o about one’s qualities (e.g., entries in Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form [PMCF] or in Mid- Year Review Form)
o Recognition from the school / school community about one’s qualities
Others (please specify)
TOTAL At least 5

Page 19 of 19
PMES Tool for S.Y. 2024-2025 | Highly Proficient
Teachers