0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views8 pages

Polity Chapter 08: State Executive Lecture 02: Election: Organization of Elections in India

The document outlines the organization of elections in India, detailing the constitutional provisions under Article 329 that prevent judicial interference in electoral matters and the structure of the Election Commission of India as established by Article 324. It discusses the roles of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners, including their appointment, removal, and terms of service, as well as the limitations of these provisions. Additionally, it explains the First-Past-The-Post electoral system, its advantages and disadvantages, and briefly introduces the Proportional Representation system.

Uploaded by

Ritesh Patil
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views8 pages

Polity Chapter 08: State Executive Lecture 02: Election: Organization of Elections in India

The document outlines the organization of elections in India, detailing the constitutional provisions under Article 329 that prevent judicial interference in electoral matters and the structure of the Election Commission of India as established by Article 324. It discusses the roles of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners, including their appointment, removal, and terms of service, as well as the limitations of these provisions. Additionally, it explains the First-Past-The-Post electoral system, its advantages and disadvantages, and briefly introduces the Proportional Representation system.

Uploaded by

Ritesh Patil
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

‭Polity‬

‭Chapter 08: State Executive‬


‭Lecture 02: Election‬
‭Organization of Elections in India:‬

‭●‬ ‭Article 329:‬‭According to this Article, the courts‬‭have been prohibited from interfering in‬
‭the validity of the electoral laws, delimitation of constituencies, etc.‬
‭○‬ ‭Thus, this article of the Indian Constitution establishes a‬‭bar to judicial‬
‭interference in electoral matters.‬
‭○‬ ‭It stipulates that the validity of any law concerning the delimitation of‬
‭constituencies or the allocation of seats, enacted under Article 327 or Article 328,‬
‭cannot be challenged in any court.‬
‭○‬ ‭Additionally, it specifies that no election to Parliament or a State Legislature can‬
‭be contested except through an election petition presented to the designated‬
‭authority as per the procedures outlined in the law enacted by the respective‬
‭Legislature.‬

‭Election Commission of India:‬

‭Composition:‬

‭●‬ ‭The Election Commission of India is composed as per‬‭Article 324(2)‬‭of the Constitution‬‭,‬
‭which states that the‬‭Election Commission consists‬‭of the‬‭Chief Election Commissioner‬
‭(CEC) and such other number of Election Commissioners the president may deem fit‬
‭from time to time subject to any law made by the parliament in this regard.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Parliament has accordingly passed the‬‭Election‬‭Commission Act 1993,‬‭which provides‬
‭for an Election Commission consisting of not more than 4 Election Commissioners.‬
‭●‬ ‭Currently, the Election Commission comprises‬‭one CEC‬‭and two Election Commissioners.‬
‭●‬ ‭Decisions‬‭of the Election Commission are made based‬‭on‬‭unanimity or consensus‬‭among‬
‭its members.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭Chief Election Commissioner (CEC):‬

‭●‬ ‭Constitutional‬‭Authority:‬‭The‬‭powers‬‭and‬‭functions‬‭of‬‭the‬‭CEC‬‭are‬‭outlined‬‭under‬‭Article‬
‭324‬‭of the Indian Constitution.‬
‭●‬ ‭Status:‬‭The CEC enjoys the status equivalent to that‬‭of a‬‭Supreme Court judge.‬
‭●‬ ‭Removal:‬ ‭The‬ ‭CEC‬ ‭can‬ ‭only‬ ‭be‬ ‭removed‬ ‭from‬ ‭office‬ ‭in‬ ‭a‬ ‭manner‬ ‭similar‬ ‭to‬ ‭that‬ ‭of‬ ‭a‬
‭Supreme‬ ‭Court‬ ‭judge.‬ ‭This‬ ‭requires‬ ‭a‬ ‭majority‬ ‭in‬ ‭both‬ ‭Houses‬ ‭of‬ ‭Parliament‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬
‭grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity.‬
‭●‬ ‭Term:‬ ‭The‬‭Parliament‬‭has‬‭passed‬‭CEC‬‭Miscellaneous‬‭Provisions‬‭Act,‬‭1951‬‭under‬‭which‬‭the‬
‭CEC‬‭is‬‭appointed‬‭for‬‭a‬‭period‬‭of‬‭6‬‭years‬‭or‬‭until‬‭they‬‭reach‬‭the‬‭age‬‭of‬‭65,‬‭whichever‬‭is‬
‭earlier.‬
‭●‬ ‭Salary‬ ‭and‬ ‭Conditions‬ ‭of‬ ‭Service:‬ ‭The‬ ‭salary‬ ‭and‬‭conditions‬‭of‬‭services‬‭of‬‭the‬‭CEC‬‭and‬
‭ECs‬‭is‬‭equivalent‬‭to‬‭that‬‭of‬‭the‬‭Cabinet‬‭Secretary.‬‭Previously,‬‭under‬‭the‬‭1991‬‭Act,‬‭it‬‭was‬
‭equivalent‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭salary‬ ‭of‬ ‭a‬ ‭Supreme‬ ‭Court‬‭Judge.‬‭The‬‭service‬‭condition‬‭should‬‭not‬‭be‬
‭changed‬‭to his/her disadvantage after his/her appointment.‬
‭●‬ ‭Appointment‬‭after‬‭Retirement:‬‭The‬‭Chief‬‭Election‬‭Commissioner‬‭is‬‭ineligible‬‭to‬‭hold‬‭any‬
‭office of profit‬‭after retirement.‬

‭Other Election Commissioners:‬

‭●‬ ‭Appointment:‬‭Other Election Commissioners are appointed‬‭by the‬‭President of India.‬


‭●‬ ‭Removal:‬‭They can be‬‭removed by the President on the‬‭recommendation of the CEC.‬
‭●‬ ‭Term:‬‭They‬‭have‬‭a‬‭fixed‬‭tenure‬‭of‬‭six‬‭years,‬‭or‬‭up‬‭to‬‭the‬‭age‬‭of‬‭65‬‭years‬‭,‬‭whichever‬‭is‬
‭earlier.‬

‭Regional Election Commissioners (REC):‬

‭●‬ ‭REC‬‭is‬‭not‬‭a‬‭member‬‭of‬‭the‬‭Election‬‭Commission‬‭of‬‭India‬‭(ECI)‬‭.‬‭They‬‭are‬‭appointed‬‭for‬
‭specific‬ ‭purposes,‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭biennial‬ ‭elections‬ ‭or‬ ‭general‬ ‭elections‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭legislative‬
‭assemblies.‬
‭●‬ ‭Appointment:‬ ‭Appointed‬ ‭by‬ ‭the‬ ‭President‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭advice‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭Chief‬ ‭Election‬
‭Commissioner.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Removal:‬‭The REC is removed by the‬‭President‬‭after‬‭the election process is completed.‬
‭●‬ ‭Function:‬‭The primary function of the REC is to‬‭conduct‬‭elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭Status:‬‭The REC is usually a‬‭senior civil servant.‬

‭Limitations of the Constitutional Provisions:‬

‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭Constitution‬ ‭has‬‭not‬‭prescribed‬‭the‬‭qualifications‬‭(legal,‬‭educational,‬‭administrative,‬


‭or judicial) of the members of the Election Commission.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Constitution has‬‭not specified the term‬‭of the‬‭members of the Election Commission.‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬‭Constitution‬‭has‬‭not‬‭debarred‬‭the‬‭retiring‬‭Election‬‭Commissioners‬‭from‬‭any‬‭further‬
‭appointment‬‭by the government.‬

‭Types of Electoral System:‬

‭First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) System:‬

‭First‬‭past‬‭the‬‭post‬‭is‬‭an‬‭electoral‬‭system‬‭where‬‭the‬‭candidate‬‭who‬‭receives‬‭the‬‭most‬‭votes‬‭wins‬
‭the‬ ‭election‬‭.‬ ‭In‬ ‭a‬ ‭first-past-the-post‬ ‭electoral‬ ‭system,‬ ‭voters‬ ‭cast‬ ‭their‬‭vote‬‭for‬‭a‬‭candidate‬‭of‬
‭their‬‭choice,‬‭and‬‭the‬‭candidate‬‭who‬‭receives‬‭the‬‭most‬‭votes‬‭wins‬‭even‬‭if‬‭the‬‭top‬‭candidate‬‭gets‬
‭less‬‭than‬‭50%,‬‭which‬‭can‬‭happen‬‭when‬‭there‬‭are‬‭more‬‭than‬‭two‬‭popular‬‭candidates.‬‭This‬‭system‬
‭has‬ ‭been‬ ‭borrowed‬ ‭from‬ ‭England‬ ‭and‬ ‭is‬ ‭followed‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭election‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭Lok‬ ‭Sabha‬ ‭and‬
‭legislative assemblies in India.‬

‭Example:‬
‭●‬ ‭Number of Voters: 1000‬
‭●‬ ‭Votes Cast: 600‬
‭○‬ ‭Candidate A: 240 votes‬
‭○‬ ‭Candidate B: 210 votes‬
‭○‬ ‭Candidate C: 150 votes‬
‭In this example, Candidate A wins despite not having an absolute majority of the total votes cast.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭Advantages:‬

‭●‬ ‭Simplicity:‬ ‭It‬ ‭is‬ ‭the‬ ‭easiest‬ ‭system‬ ‭to‬ ‭understand.‬ ‭Voters‬ ‭simply‬ ‭choose‬ ‭their‬ ‭preferred‬
‭candidate, and the one with the most votes wins.‬
‭●‬ ‭Direct‬ ‭Link:‬ ‭There‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭direct‬ ‭link‬ ‭between‬ ‭the‬ ‭people‬ ‭and‬ ‭their‬ ‭representatives.‬ ‭Each‬
‭representative is elected from a territorial constituency – one member per constituency.‬
‭●‬ ‭Single-Member‬ ‭Constituencies:‬ ‭This‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭single-member‬ ‭constituencies,‬
‭ensuring that each constituency elects one representative.‬
‭●‬ ‭Clear‬‭and‬‭Decisive‬‭Winner‬‭:‬‭FPTP‬‭tends‬‭to‬‭provide‬‭a‬‭clear‬‭and‬‭decisive‬‭winner,‬‭which‬‭can‬
‭help to provide stability and legitimacy to the electoral process.‬
‭●‬ ‭Choice‬ ‭of‬ ‭Candidates‬‭:‬ ‭The‬ ‭FPTP‬ ‭system‬ ‭offers‬ ‭voters‬ ‭the‬ ‭choice‬ ‭to‬ ‭select‬ ‭not‬ ‭only‬
‭between‬‭parties‬‭but‬‭also‬‭specific‬‭candidates.‬‭In‬‭a‬‭PR‬‭system,‬‭voters‬‭often‬‭choose‬‭a‬‭party,‬
‭and representatives are elected based on party lists.‬
‭●‬ ‭Encourages‬‭Unity‬‭:‬‭FPTP‬‭encourages‬‭voters‬‭from‬‭different‬‭social‬‭groups‬‭to‬‭unite‬‭to‬‭win‬‭an‬
‭election‬‭in‬‭a‬‭locality.‬‭In‬‭a‬‭PR‬‭system,‬‭there‬‭is‬‭a‬‭possibility‬‭that‬‭each‬‭community‬‭will‬‭form‬
‭its‬ ‭own‬ ‭nationwide‬ ‭party‬ ‭in‬ ‭a‬ ‭large‬‭and‬‭diverse‬‭country‬‭like‬‭India,‬‭potentially‬‭threatening‬
‭national unity.‬
‭●‬ ‭Accountability‬‭:‬ ‭In‬ ‭FPTP,‬ ‭voters‬ ‭know‬ ‭their‬ ‭representatives,‬ ‭unlike‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭Proportional‬
‭Representation (PR) system. This allows voters to hold their representatives accountable.‬

‭Disadvantages:‬

‭●‬ ‭Majority‬‭Gap:‬‭In‬‭cases‬‭of‬‭multi-candidate‬‭contests,‬‭none‬‭of‬‭the‬‭candidates‬‭may‬‭receive‬‭a‬
‭majority‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭votes‬ ‭polled.‬ ‭The‬ ‭winner‬ ‭or‬ ‭elected‬ ‭representative‬ ‭may‬‭not‬‭represent‬‭the‬
‭majority of voters.‬
‭●‬ ‭Over-Representation‬ ‭of‬ ‭Larger‬ ‭Parties:‬ ‭This‬ ‭system‬ ‭tends‬ ‭to‬ ‭over-represent‬ ‭larger‬
‭political parties and under-represent smaller parties.‬
‭●‬ ‭Lack‬ ‭of‬ ‭Proportional‬ ‭Representation:‬ ‭The‬ ‭FPTP‬‭system‬‭does‬‭not‬‭proportionally‬‭represent‬
‭the‬ ‭percentage‬ ‭of‬ ‭votes‬ ‭a‬ ‭party‬ ‭receives.‬ ‭Thus,‬ ‭smaller‬ ‭parties‬ ‭and‬ ‭minorities‬ ‭may‬ ‭be‬
‭under-represented.‬
‭●‬ ‭Lack‬‭of‬‭Representation‬‭for‬‭Minority‬‭Groups‬‭:‬‭FPTP‬‭often‬‭leads‬‭to‬‭a‬‭lack‬‭of‬‭representation‬
‭for‬ ‭minority‬ ‭groups.‬ ‭In‬‭a‬‭two-party‬‭system,‬‭a‬‭party‬‭that‬‭receives‬‭only‬‭a‬‭small‬‭percentage‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭votes‬ ‭may‬ ‭not‬ ‭win‬‭any‬‭seats‬‭at‬‭all,‬‭leaving‬‭a‬‭significant‬‭portion‬‭of‬‭the‬‭population‬
‭unrepresented.‬
‭●‬ ‭Strategic‬‭Voting‬‭:‬‭The‬‭FPTP‬‭system‬‭can‬‭lead‬‭to‬‭strategic‬‭voting,‬‭where‬‭voters‬‭feel‬‭pressure‬
‭to‬ ‭vote‬ ‭for‬ ‭a‬ ‭candidate‬ ‭they‬ ‭do‬ ‭not‬ ‭truly‬ ‭support‬ ‭to‬ ‭prevent‬ ‭a‬ ‭disliked‬ ‭candidate‬ ‭from‬
‭winning. This can result in voters not truly expressing their preferences.‬
‭●‬ ‭Disadvantage‬ ‭for‬ ‭Smaller‬ ‭Parties‬‭:‬ ‭Smaller‬ ‭parties‬ ‭have‬‭lesser‬‭chances‬‭of‬‭winning‬‭in‬‭the‬
‭FPTP‬ ‭system.‬ ‭Moreover,‬ ‭they‬ ‭are‬ ‭often‬ ‭forced‬ ‭to‬ ‭align‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭interests‬ ‭of‬ ‭national‬
‭parties, which undermines the purpose of local self-government and federalism.‬

‭Proportional Representation (PR) System:‬

‭In‬‭a‬‭Proportional‬‭Representation‬‭(PR)‬‭system,‬‭political‬‭parties‬‭receive‬‭representation‬‭(number‬‭of‬
‭seats)‬‭in the legislature proportional to the share‬‭of votes they receive in the elections.‬

‭Features:‬

‭●‬ ‭Fair‬ ‭Representation:‬ ‭PR‬ ‭ensures‬ ‭political‬ ‭parties‬ ‭are‬‭represented‬‭according‬‭to‬‭their‬‭share‬


‭of the vote.‬
‭●‬ ‭Every‬ ‭Vote‬ ‭Counts:‬ ‭All‬ ‭votes‬ ‭contribute‬ ‭to‬‭the‬‭allocation‬‭of‬‭seats‬‭in‬‭Parliament‬‭or‬‭other‬
‭elected bodies.‬
‭●‬ ‭Single‬ ‭Constituency:‬ ‭The‬ ‭entire‬ ‭country‬ ‭or‬ ‭state‬ ‭is‬ ‭treated‬ ‭as‬ ‭a‬ ‭single‬ ‭constituency‬‭for‬
‭the allocation of seats.‬
‭●‬ ‭Eligibility:‬‭Only‬‭political‬‭parties‬‭that‬‭receive‬‭a‬‭certain‬‭percentage‬‭of‬‭the‬‭vote‬‭(e.g.,‬‭3-5%)‬
‭are eligible for seats. Parties receiving less than this threshold do not get any seats.‬
‭●‬ ‭Seat‬‭Allocation:‬‭Seats‬‭are‬‭distributed‬‭based‬‭on‬‭the‬‭percentage‬‭of‬‭votes‬‭each‬‭party‬‭receives‬
‭in national or state elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭Filling‬ ‭Vacancies:‬ ‭If‬ ‭a‬ ‭legislator‬ ‭dies‬‭or‬‭resigns,‬‭the‬‭party‬‭nominates‬‭a‬‭replacement‬‭from‬
‭their list, eliminating the need for a by-election.‬

‭Example:‬

‭●‬ ‭Party A:‬‭25% of the votes‬


‭●‬ ‭Party B:‬‭30% of the votes‬
‭●‬ ‭Party C:‬‭10% of the votes‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Party D:‬‭10% of the votes‬
‭●‬ ‭Party E:‬‭Receives less than the threshold percentage‬‭and thus gets no seats.‬
‭In this example, Parties A, B, C, and D would be allocated seats in proportion to their vote share.‬

‭Advantages:‬

‭●‬ ‭Proportional‬ ‭Representation:‬ ‭Political‬ ‭parties‬ ‭are‬ ‭represented‬ ‭in‬ ‭proportion‬ ‭to‬ ‭their‬
‭electoral‬‭strength,‬‭reflecting‬‭the‬‭percentage‬‭of‬‭votes‬‭they‬‭receive.‬‭This‬‭ensures‬‭that‬‭smaller‬
‭parties and minority groups have a better chance of representation.‬
‭●‬ ‭No‬ ‭By-Elections‬ ‭Needed:‬ ‭If‬ ‭a‬ ‭legislator‬ ‭dies‬ ‭or‬ ‭resigns,‬ ‭the‬ ‭party‬ ‭can‬ ‭nominate‬ ‭a‬
‭replacement from their list, dispensing with the need for by-elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭National‬ ‭and‬ ‭State-Wide‬ ‭Voting:‬ ‭A‬ ‭voter‬ ‭can‬ ‭cast‬ ‭their‬ ‭vote‬ ‭from‬ ‭anywhere‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬
‭country‬ ‭in‬ ‭national‬ ‭elections‬ ‭and‬ ‭from‬ ‭anywhere‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭state‬ ‭in‬ ‭state‬ ‭elections,‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬
‭entire country or state is treated as a single constituency.‬
‭●‬ ‭Eliminates‬‭Wasted‬‭Votes:‬‭All‬‭votes‬‭contribute‬‭to‬‭the‬‭final‬‭result,‬‭reducing‬‭the‬‭number‬‭of‬
‭"wasted" votes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensures‬ ‭Every‬ ‭Vote‬ ‭Counts:‬ ‭Each‬ ‭vote‬ ‭contributes‬ ‭to‬ ‭seat‬ ‭allocation,‬ ‭enhancing‬ ‭voter‬
‭participation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Diverse‬ ‭and‬ ‭Representative‬ ‭Government:‬‭Smaller‬‭parties‬‭and‬‭minority‬‭groups‬‭gain‬‭better‬
‭representation, leading to a more diverse range of perspectives in Parliament.‬

‭Disadvantages:‬

‭●‬ ‭Unstable‬ ‭Governments:‬ ‭PR‬ ‭can‬ ‭lead‬ ‭to‬ ‭unstable‬ ‭governments‬ ‭due‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭difficulty‬ ‭in‬
‭forming stable coalitions with diverse parties and minority groups.‬
‭●‬ ‭Complexity:‬ ‭PR‬ ‭systems‬ ‭are‬ ‭more‬ ‭complex‬ ‭than‬ ‭FPTP‬ ‭systems,‬ ‭potentially‬ ‭making‬‭them‬
‭harder for voters to understand and governments to implement.‬
‭●‬ ‭Expensive:‬ ‭PR‬ ‭systems‬ ‭can‬ ‭be‬‭costly‬‭to‬‭operate,‬‭requiring‬‭significant‬‭resources‬‭and‬‭funds‬
‭to conduct elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭Neglection‬ ‭of‬ ‭Local‬ ‭Needs:‬ ‭PR‬ ‭may‬ ‭lead‬ ‭to‬ ‭leaders‬ ‭prioritizing‬ ‭party‬ ‭agendas‬ ‭over‬ ‭local‬
‭concerns,‬ ‭as‬ ‭multiple‬ ‭representatives‬ ‭share‬ ‭a‬ ‭constituency,‬ ‭diffusing‬ ‭accountability‬ ‭and‬
‭potentially neglecting specific constituency needs.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Instability‬‭:‬ ‭None‬‭of‬‭the‬‭political‬‭parties‬‭often‬‭get‬‭a‬‭majority,‬‭which‬‭can‬‭lead‬‭to‬‭coalition‬
‭governments and political instability.‬
‭●‬ ‭No‬ ‭Direct‬ ‭Link‬‭:‬ ‭There‬ ‭is‬ ‭no‬ ‭direct‬ ‭link‬ ‭between‬ ‭the‬ ‭people‬ ‭and‬ ‭their‬‭representatives,‬‭as‬
‭voters choose parties rather than individual candidates.‬
‭●‬ ‭Party‬ ‭Control‬‭:‬ ‭Political‬ ‭parties‬ ‭have‬ ‭significant‬ ‭control‬ ‭over‬ ‭which‬ ‭candidates‬ ‭get‬ ‭seats,‬
‭potentially leading to less accountability and transparency.‬

‭Returning Officer (RO):‬

‭In‬ ‭elections‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭Lok‬ ‭Sabha‬ ‭and‬ ‭Legislative‬ ‭Assemblies,‬ ‭civil‬ ‭servants‬ ‭are‬ ‭appointed‬ ‭as‬
‭Returning‬ ‭Officers‬ ‭(ROs),‬ ‭who‬ ‭work‬ ‭under‬ ‭the‬ ‭control‬ ‭of‬ ‭Election‬ ‭Commission‬ ‭of‬ ‭India.‬ ‭District‬
‭Magistrates‬‭(DMs)‬‭typically‬‭serve‬‭as‬‭ROs‬‭for‬‭Lok‬‭Sabha‬‭elections‬‭(ex-officio),‬‭while‬‭Sub-Divisional‬
‭Magistrates (SDMs) serve as ROs for State Legislative Assembly elections (ex-officio).‬

‭Responsibilities of RO:‬
‭●‬ ‭Conducting free and fair elections in their district or constituency.‬
‭●‬ ‭Performing‬ ‭quasi-judicial‬ ‭functions,‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭receiving,‬ ‭scrutinizing,‬ ‭accepting,‬ ‭or‬ ‭rejecting‬
‭nomination papers.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensuring‬ ‭candidates‬ ‭have‬ ‭the‬ ‭right‬ ‭to‬ ‭be‬ ‭heard‬ ‭in‬ ‭case‬ ‭of‬ ‭rejection‬ ‭of‬ ‭their‬ ‭nomination‬
‭papers.‬

‭Presiding Officer (PO):‬

‭Civil‬ ‭servants‬ ‭are‬ ‭appointed‬ ‭as‬ ‭Presiding‬‭Officers‬‭for‬‭elections‬‭to‬‭the‬‭Lok‬‭Sabha‬‭(House‬‭of‬‭the‬


‭People) and Legislative Assembly.‬
‭●‬ ‭Who‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭Civil‬ ‭Servant?:‬ ‭Under‬‭the‬‭Representation‬‭of‬‭the‬‭People‬‭Act‬‭(RPA)‬‭1951,‬‭a‬‭civil‬
‭servant‬ ‭for‬ ‭election‬ ‭purposes‬ ‭includes‬ ‭central‬‭and‬‭state‬‭government‬‭employees,‬‭employees‬
‭of‬ ‭public‬ ‭sector‬ ‭undertakings‬ ‭(PSUs),‬ ‭nationalized‬ ‭insurance‬ ‭companies,‬ ‭banks,‬‭and‬‭other‬
‭entities.‬
‭●‬ ‭Role:‬‭In charge of a polling booth‬‭to ensure the conduct‬‭of free and fair elections.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭Security Deposit Requirement:‬
‭●‬ ‭Candidates are required to deposit a security amount to contest elections.‬
‭○‬ ‭Lok Sabha:‬‭₹25,000 for general candidates and ₹12,500‬‭for SC/ST candidates.‬
‭○‬ ‭State‬‭Legislative‬‭Assembly:‬‭₹10,000‬‭for‬‭general‬‭candidates‬‭and‬‭₹5,000‬‭for‬‭SC/ST‬
‭candidates.‬
‭●‬ ‭Forfeiture:‬‭If‬‭a‬‭candidate‬‭receives‬‭less‬‭than‬‭one-sixth‬‭of‬‭the‬‭total‬‭valid‬‭votes‬‭polled,‬‭they‬
‭lose their security deposit.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬

You might also like