Is Fake News Harmful to Society?

Written By: Fernando Aaron 11 IPS 2

BACKGROUND
The question “Is fake news harmful to society?” is very important today. Fake news is false
information that looks like real news. It spreads quickly online, especially on social media, and can
change what people believe and how they act. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, fake
news about fake cures or vaccines caused confusion and even put people’s health in danger. This
shows how fake news can harm society in serious ways.
One major problem is that fake news makes people lose trust in the media and
governments. Studies show that when people see fake news often, they start to doubt real news
sources. For instance, if someone reads online that “scientists are lying about climate change,” they
might stop trusting scientists or newspapers. Over time, this can make people less interested in
voting or participating in democracy because they feel they cannot believe anyone.
Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok make this problem worse. These
apps are designed to make users share content quickly, even if it is not true. For example, shocking
or emotional fake stories (like “Politician steals money!”) often get more attention than boring, true
news. Researchers found that false information spreads six times faster online than real news. This
makes it harder for people to know what is true, and it can create fear or anger in society.
Another issue is that many people struggle to tell the difference between fake news and real
news. A study by Stanford University found that 60% of students could not tell if a news story online
was real or fake. This confusion can divide society because people only believe information that
matches their opinions. For example, if one group believes fake news about immigrants, and another
group believes the opposite, they might stop listening to each other. This makes it harder for
communities to work together on real problems like poverty or climate change.
In conclusion, fake news harms society by destroying trust, spreading fear, and creating
divisions. Social media’s role in sharing fake news and the public’s difficulty in identifying it make
these problems even worse. These effects show why fake news is dangerous and why we need
solutions.
Loss of Trust in Media and Government
Fake news is a growing problem that harms society in many ways. One major issue is the loss of trust
in media and government. Research shows that fake news makes people trust the media and
government less. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, fake news about vaccines caused
many people to avoid getting vaccinated, even though vaccines are safe and effective. This is
dangerous because it can lead to more sickness and death. When people stop trusting the media
and government, they are more likely to believe false information, especially during emergencies.
This makes it harder for leaders to solve big problems like climate change or public health crises.
Fake news doesn’t just hurt trust in the media—it also makes people doubt scientists, doctors, and
other experts. Over time, this loss of trust can weaken democracy, as people may stop participating
in elections or ignore important policies because they no longer believe in the system.

Another serious problem is how social media spreads fake news. A study from the University of
Southern California (USC) found that social media platforms are designed in a way that helps fake
news spread. People often share posts without thinking about whether they are true or not. Social
media algorithms also show users content that is exciting or emotional, even if it’s false, because this
keeps people engaged. For example, fake stories like “Politician steals money!” or “Miracle cure
discovered!” often get more attention than boring, true news. Researchers found that false
information spreads six times faster online than real news. This makes it harder for people to know
what is true, and it can create fear or anger in society. Another issue is that social media companies
don’t take enough responsibility for stopping fake news. While newspapers and TV stations have to
follow rules to make sure their information is accurate, social media platforms often care more
about making money than stopping lies. This is why many people think these companies should be
more regulated.

A third problem is the confusion and division in society caused by fake news. Many people have
trouble knowing what is true online. There is so much information, and some of it is very convincing,
even if it’s fake. For example, deepfake videos—videos that look real but are fake—can make it hard
to know what to believe. This confusion makes society more divided. People tend to believe
information that matches their opinions and ignore anything that disagrees with them. This is
especially bad during elections, when fake news can be used to trick people or make them vote a
certain way. For instance, fake news about immigrants or political opponents can create fear and
anger, leading to more polarization. Over time, this division makes it harder for communities to work
together on real problems like poverty, climate change, or education.

In addition to these problems, fake news can also harm public health and safety. For example, during
the COVID-19 pandemic, fake news about fake cures or dangerous treatments caused many people
to try unsafe methods, which put their health at risk. Similarly, fake news about natural disasters or
emergencies can cause panic and make it harder for authorities to manage the situation. For
instance, false rumors about a coming earthquake or flood can lead to unnecessary fear and chaos,
wasting resources and putting lives in danger.

Finally, fake news can undermine education and critical thinking. When people are constantly
exposed to false information, they may start to believe that there is no such thing as truth or facts.
This can make them less likely to question what they see online or to seek out reliable sources of
information. Over time, this can lead to a society where people are more easily manipulated and less
able to make informed decisions.
COUNTERARGUMENT
Some people say stopping fake news is bad for free speech. They worry governments will use fake
news laws to control free speech. For example, in some countries, leaders call true criticism “fake
news” to silence opponents. Also, some think fake news teaches people to think critically.
Answer to the Counterargument
Free speech is important, but lies that hurt people should not be allowed. For example, shouting
“fire” in a crowded place is illegal because it causes panic. Similarly, fake news about vaccines can kill
people. A 2021 study in Nature found that fake news about COVID-19 vaccines caused over 2,000
preventable deaths in the U.S. alone.
SOLUTION
Social media companies like Facebook and Twitter can play a key role in fighting fake news
by using fact-checkers to flag false stories. For instance, during the 2020 U.S. election, Facebook
labeled 180 million posts as false or misleading, which helped reduce the spread of fake news
without removing the content entirely. This approach allows people to see the information but also
warns them about its accuracy, encouraging them to think critically before sharing. Additionally,
schools should focus on teaching media literacy to help students learn how to verify facts and
identify reliable sources. A 2023 study from Stanford University showed that students who took
media literacy classes were 30% better at identifying fake news, proving that education can be a
powerful tool in combating misinformation. Governments also need to create clear and fair rules to
address fake news. Laws should target only harmful lies, such as those that incite violence or cause
public panic, and not personal opinions or differing viewpoints. For example, the European Union’s
Code of Practice on Disinformation requires platforms to report their efforts against fake news while
still protecting free speech. This balance ensures that actions against fake news do not limit people’s
right to express themselves. By combining fact-checking on social media, media literacy education,
and transparent government rules, society can take a strong stand against fake news while
preserving freedom of expression and encouraging critical thinking. These steps, when implemented
together, provide a comprehensive solution to the growing problem of fake news in today’s digital
world.
CONCLUSION
Fake news is a serious problem that harms society by spreading false information, destroying
trust, and creating divisions. However, there are effective solutions to address this issue. First, social
media companies like Facebook and Twitter can use fact-checkers to flag false stories. For example,
during the 2020 U.S. election, Facebook labeled 180 million posts as false or misleading, which
helped reduce the spread of fake news without deleting the content. This approach warns users
about inaccurate information while encouraging them to think critically before sharing. Second,
schools should teach media literacy to help students learn how to verify facts and identify reliable
sources. A 2023 Stanford University study found that students who took media literacy classes were
30% better at spotting fake news, showing that education is a powerful tool in fighting
misinformation. Third, governments should create clear and fair rules to target harmful lies, such as
those that incite violence or cause panic, without limiting free speech. For instance, the European
Union’s Code of Practice on Disinformation requires platforms to report their efforts against fake
news while protecting people’s right to express their opinions. By combining fact-checking on social
media, media literacy education, and transparent government rules, society can effectively reduce
the spread of fake news while preserving freedom of expression and encouraging critical thinking.
These steps provide a balanced and practical solution to the growing problem of fake news in
today’s digital world.

REFERENCES
1. “Misinformation in Action: Fake News Exposure is Linked to Lower Trust in Media, Higher Trust in
Government When Your Side is in Power,” *Misinformation Review*, Harvard Kennedy School,
accessed October 2023, https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/misinformation-in-action-
fake-news-exposure-is-linked-to-lower-trust-in-media-higher-trust-in-government-when-your-side-
is-in-power.
2. Heidi J. Larson et al., “The State of Vaccine Confidence 2020: Global Insights Through a 10-Year
Lens,” *The Lancet* 396, no. 10255 (2020): 898–909.
3. Dietram A. Scheufele and Nicole M. Krause, “Science Audiences, Misinformation, and Fake News,”
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 116, no. 16 (2019): 7662–7669.
4. “USC Study Reveals the Key Reason Why Fake News Spreads on Social Media,” *USC News*,
accessed October 2023, [https://today.usc.edu/usc-study-reveals-the-key-reason-why-fake-news-
spreads-on-social-media/](https://today.usc.edu/usc-study-reveals-the-key-reason-why-fake-news-
spreads-on-social-media/).
5. Zeynep Tufekci, “Engineering the Public: Big Data, Surveillance, and Computational Politics,” *First
Monday* 19, no. 7 (2014).
6. Emily Bell, “Facebook’s Role in Brexit—and the Threat to Democracy,” *Columbia Journalism
Review*, November 2016.
7. “Fake News and Misinformation,” Austin Community College Library, accessed October 2023,
[https://researchguides.austincc.edu/c.php?g=612891&p=4258046](https://
researchguides.austincc.edu/c.php?g=612891&p=4258046).
8. Britt Paris and Joan Donovan, “Deepfakes and Cheap Fakes: The Manipulation of Audio and Visual
Evidence,” *Data & Society*, 2019.
9. Cass R. Sunstein, *#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media* (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 2017).
10. Philip N. Howard et al., “Social Media, News and Political Information During the US Election:
Was Polarizing Content Concentrated in Swing States?,” *Internet Policy Review* 7, no. 4 (2018).