IELTS Academic Writing Task 2, Cambridge IELTS Book 10 Test 1

It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at
an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to
teach good behaviour to children?

Answer:
Some individuals argue that parents and teachers should instill a clear distinction between right
and wrong in young children from an early age, with punishment being an effective method to
achieve this. I firmly believe that while punishment can play a role in shaping a child’s
understanding of morality, it is essential that such measures do not cause physical harm. Non-
violent forms of punishment can be valuable tools for promoting proper behavior and helping
children grow into responsible individuals.

To begin with, early childhood is a critical period for forming lasting behavioral patterns. Hence,
parents and teachers must be proactive in guiding children to understand moral values and to
prevent the development of undesirable habits. Young children often lack the maturity to
comprehend the full consequences of their actions, which is why they require both guidance and
discipline. When a child consistently violates rules or engages in inappropriate behavior, it
becomes necessary to impose corrective measures. For example, if a child continues to hurt
others despite repeated explanations of the harmful nature of such actions, a non-violent form of
punishment, such as a temporary withdrawal of privileges, may help them recognize the
consequences of their behavior.

In my view, physical punishment and harsh verbal reprimands should be avoided entirely, as
they can have detrimental effects on a child’s emotional well-being. Instead, more constructive
forms of discipline can be applied. One effective method is the removal of certain privileges,
such as toys or treats, for a limited period. Parents and teachers can also reduce the amount of
affection they show to the child, making it clear that such behavior has led to this consequence.
From personal experience, I can attest to the effectiveness of this approach. As a child, when my
father would stop speaking to me for a brief period after I misbehaved, I took the situation much
more seriously than if he had simply scolded me. This tactic, though mild, was a powerful tool in
teaching me the importance of respecting others and adhering to moral standards.

In conclusion, while punishment can indeed be a useful tool for teaching children right from
wrong, it is crucial that such measures are mild and non-physical. By employing methods such as
withdrawing privileges or reducing affection, parents and teachers can help children understand
the consequences of their actions while fostering emotional growth. Ultimately, it is the
responsibility of adults to ensure that discipline is constructive and contributes to the child’s
overall development.
IELTS Academic Writing Task 2, Cambridge IELTS Book 10 Test 2

Some people think that all university students should study whatever
they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study
subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to
science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Answer:
Higher education is often seen as a crucial factor in personal growth and societal development.
While some argue that students should focus on practical subjects like science and technology,
others believe they should have the freedom to pursue their interests. I strongly support the idea
that allowing students to follow their passions fosters creativity, motivation, and long-term
success.

Proponents of limiting university courses to practical subjects point to the competitive job
market. With technology playing an increasing role in the global economy, there is a higher
demand for professionals in fields such as engineering, computer science, and biotechnology.
Research from the University of Illinois shows that STEM graduates have higher employment
rates than those in non-technical fields. From this perspective, prioritizing these areas ensures
students are more likely to secure stable, well-paying jobs, which benefits both individuals and
the economy.

However, others argue that academic freedom is fundamental to higher education. When students
are allowed to study subjects they are passionate about, such as literature, philosophy, or the arts,
they are more motivated and engaged. This intrinsic interest leads to deeper learning and
innovation, even in unexpected fields. Additionally, subjects like the humanities play a
significant role in fostering critical thinking, empathy, and cultural identity, which are essential
for a well-rounded society. By offering a variety of disciplines, universities contribute to
developing adaptable and creative individuals.

In my opinion, students should have the freedom to choose their academic paths, as passion
drives long-term success. While it is important to consider career prospects, restricting students’
options could prevent them from pursuing their strengths. A society thrives when its members
are both skilled and inspired. Therefore, universities should balance practical skills with
intellectual diversity.

In conclusion, while prioritizing technical subjects may bring immediate economic benefits,
academic freedom is key to nurturing creativity and societal development. Universities should
empower students to follow their interests while providing them with the information they need
to make informed choices.
IELTS Academic Writing Task 2, Cambridge IELTS Book 10 Test 3
Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products
anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Answer:
In recent years, the increasing similarity of products across countries has led to a loss of
uniqueness in the market. While some may argue that this promotes global integration, I believe
this trend has several negative consequences, particularly in the realms of international trade and
competition.

Firstly, the widespread availability of similar products can have a detrimental effect on
international trade. When consumers can easily access the same items locally, the need for
imports diminishes. This not only reduces the income generated from trade but also weakens a
country’s global connections. For example, countries with stronger currencies may lose their
competitive advantage as consumers within other nations no longer need to pay higher taxes or
tariffs for imported goods. This can impact the national economy by reducing foreign exchange
earnings and weakening international relationships that are often built on trade.

Moreover, the lack of product differentiation creates fierce competition among manufacturers,
often leading to a race to the bottom in terms of pricing. When products are nearly identical,
companies tend to compete by lowering prices, which negatively affects their profitability. As a
result, businesses may resort to cutting costs in areas such as employee salaries or workforce
size. Small firms, especially in sectors like technology, may struggle to survive under these
conditions, facing bankruptcy or downsizing due to insufficient earnings. For example, tech
startups often lack the resources to keep up with larger corporations that can afford to mass-
produce at lower costs.

In conclusion, while the globalization of products brings certain conveniences, it also poses
significant challenges. It can undermine international trade, reduce income from exports, and
create unhealthy competition among manufacturers, ultimately affecting both economies and
businesses. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the long-term impacts of this trend on global
markets.
IELTS Academic Writing Task 2, Cambridge IELTS Book 10 Test 4

Many museums charge for admission while others are free.

Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the
disadvantages?

Answer:

The commercialization of cultural tourism, particularly the practice of charging for museum
entry, is a topic that sparks debate. While some argue that it fosters financial sustainability,
others believe it limits access to educational resources. In my view, the benefits of charging
admission fees outweigh the drawbacks, though it is important to strike a balance to ensure
public approval.

One key advantage of charging for museum entry is the financial stability it provides. Revenue
from ticket sales can support museum operations, staff salaries, and the preservation of exhibits,
ensuring that the museum remains a sustainable cultural resource. For instance, the National
Museum of Nigeria uses income from admission fees to fund staff salaries, maintain its facilities,
and finance new exhibitions. Without such funding, many museums would struggle to provide
quality services. Additionally, ticket sales allow museums to offer specialized programs and
interactive exhibits that enrich the visitor experience, benefiting both local and international
audiences.

However, critics argue that charging admission can exclude certain groups, particularly students
or individuals from lower-income backgrounds, from accessing valuable educational resources.
Museums are often seen as spaces for learning and cultural enrichment, and when entry fees are
imposed, they may discourage educational trips or limit access for those who cannot afford to
pay. Research in Ghana, for example, found that a large proportion of the population
disapproved of museum fees, believing that cultural heritage should be accessible to all. This
highlights a genuine concern about social equity and the potential for exclusion.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns regarding the commercialization of cultural
tourism, I believe the advantages of financial support and sustainability outweigh the drawbacks.
To address the issue of accessibility, museums could offer discounted or free admission days,
ensuring that cultural enrichment remains available to everyone. Ultimately, with the right
balance, charging for admission can be a beneficial practice for both museums and visitors alike.
IELTS GT Writing Task 2, Cambridge IELTS Book 10 Test A
In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.
What do you think are the main causes of crime?
How can we deal with those causes?

Answer:

Crime is a widespread issue that affects many nations globally. In recent years, the rise in crime
has become a growing concern for both policymakers and the general public. This essay will
examine the key causes of crime and propose potential solutions to address these underlying
issues.

Several factors contribute to the increase in criminal activity. One of the primary causes is
poverty and unemployment. When individuals struggle to make ends meet through legitimate
means, they often resort to illegal activities to survive or provide for their families. Research
shows a strong correlation between poverty and crime, particularly in regions like South Asia
and Africa, where high unemployment rates often coincide with rising crime rates. Another
significant factor is substance abuse. Drug addiction and alcoholism can impair judgment and
decision-making, pushing individuals to commit crimes. For example, many drug users engage
in criminal activities to fund their addiction, as the need for illegal substances clouds their
rational thinking and moral compass.

To tackle the root causes of crime, a comprehensive, multi-pronged approach is required.

Governments must invest in programs aimed at reducing poverty and unemployment. Initiatives
such as job training, educational opportunities, and financial support for struggling families can
reduce the economic pressures that often lead to criminal behavior. Countries like Malaysia and
Thailand, which have focused on economic development and poverty alleviation, have seen
notable declines in crime rates in recent years. Additionally, increasing investment in addiction
treatment and rehabilitation programs is essential. Nations such as Norway and Sweden have
demonstrated success in reducing crime by providing comprehensive support for drug and
alcohol addicts, helping them break the cycle of substance abuse and criminality.

In conclusion, the rise in crime is a multifaceted issue that demands a holistic response. By
addressing the root causes—poverty, unemployment, and substance abuse—through targeted
policies and programs, governments can help reduce crime rates. A collaborative effort between
governments, communities, and organizations is crucial to creating a safer, more secure society
for all.
IELTS GT Writing Task 2, Cambridge IELTS Book 10 Test B

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?

Answer:
In recent years, the number of toys given to children has increased significantly, with many
parents buying more toys as a substitute for the time they cannot spend playing with their
children. While this trend may have some advantages, I believe that the drawbacks outweigh the
benefits, and parents should reconsider the impact of excessive toy consumption on their
children.

On the one hand, having a wide variety of toys can provide children with entertainment and
stimulate learning. Many modern toys are designed with educational value in mind, particularly
in areas like science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). For instance, toys that
involve building structures or solving puzzles can enhance a child’s problem-solving skills and
logical thinking. Furthermore, these toys can keep children occupied, reducing the likelihood of
boredom and offering parents a chance to manage other responsibilities.

However, there are significant disadvantages to giving children too many toys. First, an
overabundance of toys can make children feel entitled and less appreciative of what they have.
When toys are given without effort or anticipation, children may take them for granted and
neglect to care for them. Additionally, the constant availability of new toys can overwhelm
children, making it harder for them to engage in creative or independent play. Research suggests
that children who experience boredom are more likely to develop creativity and problem-solving
skills as they seek ways to entertain themselves.

In my opinion, while toys can certainly enhance a child’s development, the key to fostering a
child’s growth lies not in quantity but in quality. Parents should focus on spending meaningful
time with their children, engaging in play that encourages imagination, creativity, and critical
thinking. Ultimately, a balanced approach, where toys are not used as substitutes for parental
involvement, is far more beneficial in the long run.

In conclusion, while there are clear advantages to giving children educational toys, I believe that
the negative effects of excessive toy consumption far outweigh the benefits. Parents should strive
to create a balance that emphasizes quality time and mindful play over material abundance.