0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views5 pages

Order

The court denied the bail application of Pardeep, who is accused of attacking the complainant and his father with an axe, resulting in serious injuries. The court found that the allegations against Pardeep were serious, and there was a likelihood he might misuse bail or abscond. The application was dismissed based on the gravity of the offense and the evidence presented, including the recovery of the weapon used in the attack.

Uploaded by

richie007.sh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views5 pages

Order

The court denied the bail application of Pardeep, who is accused of attacking the complainant and his father with an axe, resulting in serious injuries. The court found that the allegations against Pardeep were serious, and there was a likelihood he might misuse bail or abscond. The application was dismissed based on the gravity of the offense and the evidence presented, including the recovery of the weapon used in the attack.

Uploaded by

richie007.sh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Pardeep Vs.

State of Haryana

HRRE010026112025

Presented on : 04-04-2025
Registered on : 04-04-2025
Decided on : 08-04-2025
Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 4 days

IN THE COURT OF
Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari
(Presided Over by Dr. Sunita Grover)
BA/521/2025
Pardeep son of Rajbir Singh, resident of village Usmapur, Tehsil Kosli
District Rewari.

….Applicant-accused

Versus

State of Haryana

….Respondent

FIR No. 154 dated 18.12.2024


Under Sections: 110, 115,117(2), 118/1, 126, 238
(a), 3(5), 324(4), 351(2) BNS-2023
Police Station: Rohdai

Application Under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha


Sanhita, 2023.

Present: Sh. Ishu Sharma, Counsel for applicant/accused


Sh. Tahir HUssain, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State
assisted by Sh. Ravinder Yadav , Counsel for complainant
SI Giriraj, Investigating officer in person
ORDER:
This is the First application filed on behalf of applicant-

accused Pardeep for regular bail under section 483 BNSS.

2. Notice of the bail application was given to the State. Police

( Dr. Sunita Grover)


ASJ/Rewari, 08.04.2025
UID No. HR0128
Pardeep Vs. State of Haryana

report has been filed reiterating the allegations of first information report

registered on the complaint moved by complainant Gautam Singh son of

Sh. Sajjan Singh alleging that on 17.12.2024, he alongwith Joginder son

of Bhim Singh, Resident of Usmapur had gone in vehicle

No.HR31Q2784 ECO to work in the field and he parked the vehicle on

Katcha passage infront of the field and during that Pardeep son of Rajbir,

Punit son of Ravinder, resident of village Usmapur and one other person

came on the motorcycle at his field and restrained their way and they

started hurling abuses for keeping grudge regarding previous dispute for

tying buffalo in the plot. It is alleged that thereafter Pardeep gave axe

blow on the right shoulder of complainant and Punit gave axe blow on the

back of the complainant and the complainant was rescued by Joginder

and on this both the assailants stated that he was saved by Joginder but in

future they will kill him and thereafter, the assailants left the field and

broke the windowpanes of his vehicle with axe and also hit axe at several

places on the body of the vehicle. Thereafter complainant made a call to

his brother Govind, who stated that he was on the shop at Kosli and he

would telephonically inform his father and uncle Ajit Singh.

Complainant alleged that his father Sajjan Singh was working in

Panchayati filed at Markpur road and then Pardeep, Punit and the other

person were asked by Sajjan Singh as to why they had given beatings to

Gautam, on this, Pardeep attacked with axe on the head of his father and

( Dr. Sunita Grover)


ASJ/Rewari, 08.04.2025
UID No. HR0128
Pardeep Vs. State of Haryana

Punit hit axe on his waist and face. Seeing this, Ajit uncle of complainant

also reached there on which the assailants fled away. As per complainant,

his brother Gobind also reached there and his uncle and brother took him

and his father to the Government Hospital, Rewari for treatment and

admitted them there. Complainant requested to take legal action against

the abovesaid persons.

3. I have heard Sh. Ishu Sharma, learned counsel for applicant-

accused and Sh. Tahir Hussain, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for

State assisted by learned counsel for complainant and have perused the

record.

4. It is argued by learned counsel for applicant-accused that a

false case has been registered against the applicant-accused and he is

innocent and has not committed any such offence. It is argued that as

complainant allegedly sustained grievous hurt, he should have taken rest

for minimum 15 days but he joined his duty after 13 days from the date of

alleged incident and the opinion of medical officer is not reliable. It is

submitted that nothing is to be recovered from applicant-accused and the

investigation of the case is complete and challan has already been

submitted before the court. It is submitted that the applicant-accused has

been coming in custody since 29.12.2024 and therefore, the bail

application is prayed to be allowed. Learned counsel for applicant-

accused has relied upon the case titled as Amrit Pal Singh Vs. State of

( Dr. Sunita Grover)


ASJ/Rewari, 08.04.2025
UID No. HR0128
Pardeep Vs. State of Haryana

Punjab 2023(4) Law Herald (P&H), 3169.

5. On the other hand, Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for

State assisted by learned counsel for complainant opposed the bail

application stating that there are specific allegations in the FIR against the

applicant-accused and his participation in the alleged offence is also

specifically mentioned in the complaint. It is argued that the applicant-

accused and co-accused caused serious injuries and extended threat to kill

the complainant and therefore, in view of the seriousness of the offence,

the bail application of the applicant-accused is prayed to be dismissed.

6. After hearing both the sides and considering their arguments

and the material available on record, as per allegations levelled, the

applicant-accused alongwith co-accused in furtherance of common

intention attacked upon the complainant and his father with axe and

caused injuries to them. The sharp part of the axe has been recovered

from the applicant-accused and motorcycle has been recovered from the

applicant-accused and the wooden part of axe was destroyed by burning

and Section 238A was added in the case. The applicant-accused is named

in the FIR and specific injuries are attributed to him.

7. In the facts and circumstances and in view of the seriousness

of the offence alleged against the applicant-accused, there remains the

likelihood that applicant-accused may misuse the concession of bail and

may abscond from the legal proceedings. Therefore, keeping in view the

( Dr. Sunita Grover)


ASJ/Rewari, 08.04.2025
UID No. HR0128
Pardeep Vs. State of Haryana

seriousness of allegations and gravity of the offence and without

commenting on the merits of the case and for the aforesaid reasons, the

bail application of applicant-accused is hereby dismissed. File be

consigned to record room.

Pronounced in open court. (Dr. Sunita Grover),


Dated: 08.04.2025 Additional Sessions Judge,
Rewari UID No. HR0128

Note: All the five pages of this order have been checked and signed.

(Dr. Sunita Grover),


Additional Sessions Judge
Rewari UID No.HR0128
Neeru
Stenographer-1

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS

( Dr. Sunita Grover)


ASJ/Rewari, 08.04.2025
UID No. HR0128

You might also like