Julianne McKinney - Letter To Senator John Glenn (1994)
Uploaded by
batmathJulianne McKinney - Letter To Senator John Glenn (1994)
Uploaded by
batmathJulianne McKinney to Sen. John Glenn https://www.transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/mck2glen.
htm
Psychotronic Weapons Letter To Senate Committee
(The following letter is alarming and vital to the understanding of how far the
issue of psychotronic weapons and projects aimed at controlling American
citizens and people everywhere has progressed. This letter is dated February 9,
1994. The organization involved is no longer available at this address below.
Ms. McKinney is said to be occupying a much lower profile these days.
Nevertheless, this is an important document to consider)
Association of National Security Alumni Electronic
Surveillance Project P. O. Box 13625
Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625
February 9, 1994
Chairman John Glenn
Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs
340 Dirkson Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Attention: Mr. Chris Kline
Subject: Involuntary Human Experimentation with Non-Ionizing
Radiation
Dear Mr. Kline:
Senator Glenn's publicly-expressed outrage that this government has
(once again) been found to be engaging in brutal forms of involuntary
human experimentation, and his demand, in effect, that any and all
forms of this type of experimentation be exposed was heartening.
A large and growing number of people in this country hope that the
Senator's expressed outrage was sincere, and that your Committee's
investigations are not simply a means of diverting attention from
complaints centering on this government's long-term role in
involuntary human experiments with non-ionizing forms of radiation.
Now that the Departments of Defense, Energy and Justice have openly
1 of 4 9/14/24, 00:43
Julianne McKinney to Sen. John Glenn https://www.transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/mck2glen.htm
admitted that directed-energy weapons systems do indeed exist,
complaints of experimentation with these systems can no longer be
ignored.
As stated to you during our telephone conversation last week, this
Project is focused on complaints concerning experiments with non-
ionizing, so-called "non-lethal," directed- energy weapons, surveillance
and psychotronics systems. In bringing this to your attention, I am
representing the interests, currently, of some 100 U.S. citizens, who are
the subjects of both vicious forms of overt harassment and concurrent
directed-energy harassment.
The enclosed copy of Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control
Experimentation is a preliminary investigative finding, only. The
accompanying Supplement furnishes an update on the current status
of this Project.
I am also enclosing copies of letters exchanged with, and directed to
the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, and the Food &
Drug Administration, which are self-explanatory. I am also enclosing
copies of two articles concerning John Alexander, of the Los Alamos
National Laboratory's Nonlethal Weapons Division, which I will
address below. Also enclosed is a letter to a woman in contact with this
Project which addresses some of the effects of long-term exposure to
these so-called "non-lethal" systems. Just as a matter of interest--DoD-
sponsored "hy'e" in the media to the contrary notwithstanding--non-
lethal weapons systems can be incredibly lethal.
They are not gentle systems, as this government would like for the
public to believe. Questions which need to be asked by the Committee
on Government Affairs, as a preliminary, are as follows:
1. By what formal means are U.S. Government agencies, to include the
Department of Defense, prevented from testing "non-lethal", directed-
energy weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems on U.S.
citizens under involuntary circumstances?
2. By what formal means are U.S. Government contractors and sub-
contractors prevented from testing "non- lethal", directed-energy
weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems on U.S. citizens
under involuntary circumstances?
3. Why does the Energy Policy Act of 1992 fail to prohibit involuntary
2 of 4 9/14/24, 00:43
Julianne McKinney to Sen. John Glenn https://www.transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/mck2glen.htm
human experimentation with non-ionizing forms of radiation?
4. How many members of Congress and of the Administration have
investments in firms which are engaged in the development and
testing of directed-energy systems?
5. Why is Los Alamos National Laboratory, a Department of Energy
agency, engaged in the development of "non-lethal", directed-energy
systems?
6. Why is John Alexander--a 30-year US Army Special Forces veteran
with a long-term interest in the "psychotronics" (mind-control) aspects
of directed-energy systems-- regarded as being particularly qualified to
direct the Non-Lethal Systems Division of Los Alamos National
Laboratory?
7. Why is the Department of Energy (and John Alexander in particular)
in the business of promoting "non- lethal" systems as tools for law
enforcement, and as weapons systems for the military?
8. Why are these "non-lethal" systems being kept classified?
9. Where is the test data on the efficacy of these directed-energy
weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems being obtained, and
who in Congress, specifically, is overseeing those experiments?
10. Why is the Department of Defense pushing for an increase in the
numbers of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers in this
country?
11. How many satellites launched under the auspices of DoD, the
National Reconnaissance Office, and the Central Intelligence Agency
are engaged in the surveillance of U.S. citizens" And how many of
those satellites qualify as directed-energy emitters; i.e., as "amplified
communications" satellites?
12. What federal constraints have been placed on the construction of
microwave towers and other antennae arrays in this country; and
what assurances do U.S. citizens have that emissions from those
towers and antennae arrays are not being used for involuntary human
experimental purposes?
14. Who in Congress is overseeing the construction and use of
microwave towers and antennae arrays in this country?
3 of 4 9/14/24, 00:43
Julianne McKinney to Sen. John Glenn https://www.transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/mck2glen.htm
15. Why is it that complaints by U.S. citizens concerning directed-
energy harassment and experimentation are being ignored?
16. Since Ms. .Susan Patrick Ford, of the Department of Defense,
appears to be unable to answer the questions posed in my letter to her
dated November 18, 1993, can you answer these questions?
In sum, Mr. Kline, this is a problem which Congress can ill afford to
ignore. There are many angry people in this country who are fed up
with these experiments. (Not all experimentees are kept effectively
isolated.) A number of experimentees recognize the rapidly
burgeoning numbers of microwave towers and antennae arrays in this
country are a part of the problem--a level of recognition which,
indeed, may have prompted the destruction of two major
"communications towers" in Chiapas, Mexico, shortly prior to that
government's decision to close the borders to that state.
A lawless government spawns a lawlessness, generally. It is apparent
to me that this country is merely "testing its wings", so to speak, where
lawlessness and chaos, at this stage, is concerned. Creating more
prisons and hiring more police is not the solution.
The U.S. Congress--and Senator Glenn's Committee, in particular,--is in
a position to ensure that no government agency, surrogate or
otherwise, has a license to run rampant over the human and civil
rights of citizens of this country, and that this government, once again,
learns to adhere to the principles which were the basis for this
country's creation.
Please do let me hear from you concerning the foregoing.
Sincerely,
JULIANNE MCKINNEY
Director, Electronic Surveillance Project
Home
4 of 4 9/14/24, 00:43
