Scribd
Upload
4 views1 page

Judging Rubric

The document outlines a judging rubric for evaluating projects based on five criteria: Impact of Solution, Technical Proficiency, Innovation and Creativity, Feasibility and Scalability, and Presentation and Communication. Each criterion includes specific questions for judges to assess the projects and a scoring system from 1 to 10, indicating the level of relevance, execution, creativity, feasibility, and clarity. The rubric aims to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of projects addressing real-world problems.

Uploaded by

Pure Fit Gym Samarahan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views1 page

Judging Rubric

The document outlines a judging rubric for evaluating projects based on five criteria: Impact of Solution, Technical Proficiency, Innovation and Creativity, Feasibility and Scalability, and Presentation and Communication. Each criterion includes specific questions for judges to assess the projects and a scoring system from 1 to 10, indicating the level of relevance, execution, creativity, feasibility, and clarity. The rubric aims to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of projects addressing real-world problems.

Uploaded by

Pure Fit Gym Samarahan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

JUDGE NAME: TEAM /SCHOOL NAME:

Criteria Description Sample Questions for Judges Score Description (1-10) Score (1-10)
1-2: Little to no relevance to real-world problems
1. How effectively does the project address a real-world 1. What specific real-world problem does your project address, and no measurable impact.
problem or challenge? and why did you choose this issue? 3-5: Addresses a problem, but the potential impact is
Impact of Solution 2. Is the solution relevant to societal or global issues (e.g., 2. How do you measure or predict the impact of your solution on unclear or limited.
(25%) SDGs)? the intended audience or stakeholders? 6-8: Tackles a meaningful problem with good
3. Does the solution create meaningful and measurable 3. Can this project scale to benefit more people or communities? potential for measurable outcomes.
outcomes for the intended audience? If so, how? 9-10: Clearly demonstrates a high level of societal or
community impact.

1. What were the most challenging technical aspects of your 1-2: Poor execution or significant technical flaws.

1. How well-executed is the project? (e.g., code quality, project, and how did you overcome them?
3-5: Moderate execution with noticeable gaps.
Technical hardware design, functionality) 2. How does your solution ensure reliability, efficiency, or
Proficiency (25%) 2. Are there significant technical achievements or accuracy?
complexity in the solution? 3. Did you use specific tools, frameworks, or datasets, and why 6-8: Well-executed with minor issues or limitations.
were they important? 9-10: Outstanding execution with no significant
issues.

1-2: Minimal creativity or lacks originality.


1. What makes your solution unique compared to existing ones?
1. How original is the solution? Does it demonstrate
2. Did you experiment with new methods, technologies, or 3-5: Moderately creative, but lacks uniqueness or
Innovation and unique or creative thinking?
approaches in your project? depth.
Creativity (20%) 2. Does the project introduce new ideas, methods, or
3. How did you incorporate feedback (if any) during 6-8: Good creativity with some unique aspects.
features?
development? 9-10: Highly innovative and original, showcasing
exceptional creativity.

1-2: Not feasible or overly impractical.


1. If this project were implemented on a larger scale, what
challenges would you face, and how would you address them?
1. Can the solution be realistically implemented or scaled 3-5: Feasible but limited in scalability or practicality.
Feasibility and 2. What resources (e.g., time, funding, expertise) would be
in the real world? 6-8: Feasible and moderately scalable with good
Scalability (15%) required to implement this solution in the real world?
2. Is it cost-effective, practical, and accessible? practicality.
3. Have you considered potential risks or limitations, and how
would you mitigate them? 9-10: Highly feasible and demonstrates strong
scalability in real-world applications.

1-2: Unclear presentation with minimal effort.


1. Can you explain your solution in one or two sentences for
3-5: Moderately clear but lacks engagement or
1. How clearly and effectively does the team present their someone with no technical background?
Presentation and structure.
solution? 2. What would you say is the key takeaway or message you want
Communication 6-8: Clear and engaging with minor gaps in
2. Is the presentation engaging and easy to understand to leave with the audience?
(15%) communication or structure.
for technical and non-technical audiences? 3. How does your presentation reflect the priorities and goals of
your project? 9-10: Highly engaging, professional, and thoroughly
clear for all audiences.

You might also like