Ch. 5 - Financial Instruments (IND As 32, 107, 109)
Ch. 5 - Financial Instruments (IND As 32, 107, 109)
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
5 (IND AS 32, 107, 109)
Disclosures
Offsetting
Classification
financial asset
as Liability v/s
& financial
Equity liability
FINANCIAL REPORTING 1
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Physical assets, leased asset and intangible assets
Physical assets (such as inventories, property, plant and equipment), leased assets
and intangible assets (such as patents and trademarks) are not financial assets.
• Prepaid expenses
Assets (such as prepaid expenses) for which the future economic benefit is the
receipt of goods or services, rather than the right to receive cash or another
financial asset, are not financial assets.
Similarly, items such as deferred revenue and most warranty obligations are
not financial liabilities because the outflow of economic benefits associated
with them is the delivery of goods and services rather than a contractual
obligation to pay cash or another financial asset.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 2
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
(13) Advance given for goods and No • These instruments provide future
services economic benefit in the form of
goods or services, rather than the
right to receive cash.
Accordingly, in the given case, the relevant requirements of Ind AS 109, Ind AS 32
and Ind AS107 shall be applied retrospectively.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 3
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Illustration 3: Deposits
Z Ltd. (the ‘Company’) makes sale of goods to customers on credit. Goods are
carried in large containers for delivery to the dealers’ destinations. All dealers are
required to deposit a fixed amount of ` 10,000 as security for the containers, which
is returned only when the contract with Company terminates. The deposits carry 8%
per annum which is payable only when the contract terminates. If the containers are
returned by the dealers in broken condition or any damage caused, then appropriate
adjustments shall be made from the deposits at the time of settlement. How would
such deposits be treated in books of the dealers?
Solution:
In this case, deposits are receivable in cash at the end of contract period between
the dealer and the Company. These deposits represent cash flows that are solely
payments of principal and interest. Moreover, these deposits normally cannot be
sold. Hence, they meet the definition of financial asset carried at amortised cost.
Solution:
A Ltd. has entered into a contractual arrangement for purchase of goods at a fixed
consideration payable to the creditor. A contractual arrangement that provides for
payment in fixed amount of cash to another entity meets the definition of financial
liability.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 4
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
FINANCIAL REPORTING 5
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Categorisation of financial assets (FA) is determined based on the business model that
determines how cash flows of the financial asset are collected and the contractual cash
flow characteristics; and can be:
(a) Measured at Amortised cost
(b) Measured at fair value through comprehensive income (FVOCI)
(c) Measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL).
FINANCIAL REPORTING 6
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
FVTOCI
Amortised Cost FVTOCI (Debt) FVTPL
(Equity)
Initial At Transaction Value(assumed that transaction is at market terms
Measurement &therefore, transaction value = fair value)
Transaction Cost Add to Initial Measurement P&L
Subsequent At Amortised Cost
Measurement using Effective At Fair Value
Interest Method (EIM)
Difference on NA OCI with recycling OCI P&L
Subsequent without
Measurement recycling
Difference on P&L P&L, previous OCI P&L
Disposal or De – transfer to OCI will
Recognition be recycled to P&L
Interest or P&L
Dividend
FINANCIAL REPORTING 7
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
(1) Financial Assets repayable on demand to be always shown at Value equal to the
amount to be received on repayment (eg. Telephone / Electricity Deposits, Loans
repayable on demand).
(3) Transaction between Holding Company & Subsidiary Company (Under IND AS
Ecosystem)
Benefit by H Co to S Co Benefit by S Co to H Co
FINANCIAL REPORTING 8
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
(4)
FA Measured at fair value (FVOCI / FVTPL)
• Upon initial recognition, all financial liabilities are measured at fair value.
Subsequently, per Ind AS 109.4.2.1 – the classification of financial liabilities shall
be as follows:
(A) Measured at amortised cost
FINANCIAL REPORTING 9
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
In case the entity changes its business model objective, there is a possibility of re-
classification of Financial Asset (from one basket to the other), but there is no possibility
of reclassification of Financial Liability.
Illustration 6
X Ltd. had taken 6 year term loan in April 20X0 from bank and paid processing fees
at the time of sanction of loan.
The term loan is disbursed in different tranches from April 20X0 to April 20X6. On
the date of transition to Ind AS, i.e. 1.4.20X5, it has calculated the net present
value of term loan disbursed upto 31.03.20X5 by using effective interest rate and
proportionate processing fees has been adjusted in disbursed amount while
calculating net present value. What will be the accounting treatment of processing
fees belonging to undisbursed term loan amount?
Solution:
Processing fee is an integral part of the effective interest rate of a financial
instrument and shall be included while calculating the effective interest rate.
(a) Accounting treatment in case future drawdown is probable
It may be noted that to the extent there is evidence that it is probable that
the undisbursed term loan will be drawn down in the future, the processing
fee is accounted for as a transaction cost under Ind AS 109, i.e., the fee is
deferred and deducted from the carrying value of the financial liabilities
when the draw down occurs and considered in the effective interest rate
calculations.
(b) Accounting treatment in case future drawdown is not probable
If it is not probable that the undisbursed term loan will be drawn down in the
future, then the fees is recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over
the term of the loan.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 10
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Illustration 7
PQR Limited had obtained term loan from Bank A in 20X1-20X2 and paid loan
processing fees and commitment charges.
In May 20X5, PQR Ltd. has availed fresh loan from Bank B as take-over of facility
i.e. the new loan is sanctioned to pay off the old loan taken from Bank A. The
company paid prepayment premium to Bank A to clear the old term loan and paid
processing fees to Bank B for the new term loan.
Whether the prepayment premium and the processing fees both will be treated as
transaction cost (as per Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments) of obtaining the new
loan, in the financial statements of PQR Ltd?
Solution:
(a) Accounting treatment of prepayment premium
Ind AS 109, provides that if an exchange of debt instruments or modification
of terms is accounted for as an extinguishment, any costs or fees incurred are
recognised as part of the gain or loss on the extinguishment in the statement
of profit and loss. Since the original loan was prepaid, the prepayment would
result in extinguishment of the original loan. The difference between the CV
of the financial liability extinguished and the consideration paid shall be
recognised in profit or loss as per Ind AS 109.
Accordingly, the prepayment premium shall be recognised as part of the gain
or loss on extinguishment of the old loan.
(b) Accounting treatment of Unamortised processing fee of old loan
Unamortised processing fee related to the old loan will also be required to be
charged to the statement of profit and loss.
(c) Accounting treatment of Processing fee for new loan
Transaction costs are “Incremental costs that are directly attributable to the
acquisition, issue or disposal of a financial asset or financial liability. An
incremental cost is one that would not have been incurred if the entity had
not acquired, issued or disposed of the financial instrument.”
It is assumed that the loan processing fees solely relates to the origination of the
new loan(i.e. does not represent loan modification/renegotiation fees). Hence, the
processing fees paid toavail fresh loan from Bank B will be considered as
transaction cost in the nature of origination fees of the new loan and will be
included while calculating effective interest rate as per Ind AS 109.
(A) PV of Cash Flow based on modified terms (+) Expenses, if any (using Original E.I.R)
(-)
(B) PV of Balance Cash Flows based on original terms (i.e. Carrying Amount) (using
Original E.I.R)
FINANCIAL REPORTING 11
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Equal to OR More than 10% of B
Illustration 8
Original Loan Amount = ` 10,00,000 (10 years ago)
Carrying Value today on 01.01.2005 = ` 10,00,000
Original E.I.R = 10%
On 01.01.2005, terms of loan were modified.
Existing Terms Modified Terms
Repayment Date 31.12.2009 31.12.2011
Rate of Interest 10% 5%
Interest Amount p.a. ` 1,00,000 ` 50,000
Redemption Amount ` 10,00,000 ` 15,00,000
Expenses Incurred = ` 1,00,000
Existing ROI in Market = 11%
Scene B: Assume redemption amount to be ` 14,00,000.
**Carve Out: FCCB (Foreign Compulsory Convertible Bonds) under IND AS are treated
as Equity## but under IFRS are treated as Financial Liability.
##Logically, FCCB is a compound financial instrument where obligation to pay interest
is a financial liability and conversion into fixed number of shares for fixed
consideration inforeign currency is equity.
Accounting:
Total Fair Value of Instrument XXX
Less: Fair Value of Debt Component (XXX)
(Consider Contractual Cash Flows where entity has obligation to pay x Market Rate of
Interest)
Equity Portion XXX
FINANCIAL REPORTING 13
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
(1) Once classified as Equity, there would be no re-measurement.
(2) Transaction Cost in relation to Equity are to be adjusted from Equity.
(3) Distribution of Transaction Cost for Compound Instruments:
Conversion
Classification of the liability and equity components of a convertible instrument is not
revised as a result of a change in the likelihood that a conversion option will be
exercised, even when exercise of the option may appear to have become economically
advantageous to some holders. Holders may not always act in the way that might be
expected because, for example, the tax consequences resulting from conversion may
differ among holders. Furthermore, the likely hood of conversion will change from time
to time. The entity’s contractual obligation to make future payments remains
outstanding until it is extinguished through conversion, maturity of the instrument or
some other transaction. (Ind AS 32.30)
On conversion of a convertible instrument at maturity, the entity:
• derecognises the liability component and
• recognises it as equity.
• original equity component remains as equity (although it may be transferred from
one line item within equity to another).
• there is no gain or loss on conversion at maturity.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 14
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Early settlement
When an entity extinguishes a convertible instrument before maturity through an early
redemption or repurchase in which the original conversion privileges are unchanged, the
entityal locates the consideration paid and any transaction costs for the repurchase or
redemption to the liability and equity components of the instrument at the date of the
transaction.
The method used in allocating the consideration paid and transaction costs to the
separate components is consistent with that used in the original allocation to the
separate components of the proceeds received by the entity when the convertible
instrument was issued.
In other words, the issuer:
• starts by allocating the settlement price to the remaining liability i.e. it
determinest he fair value of the remaining liability using a discount rate that is
based on circumstances at the settlement date (this rate may differ from the rate
used for the original allocation), and
• allocates the residual settlement amount to the equity component.
As per Ind AS 32, once the allocation of the consideration is made, any resulting gain or
loss is treated in accordance with accounting principles applicable to the related
component, as follows:
(a) the amount of gain or loss relating to the liability component is recognised in profit
or loss; and
(b) the amount of consideration relating to the equity component is recognised in
equity.
TREASURY SHARES
If an entity reacquires its own equity instruments:
• Consideration paid for those instruments (‘treasury shares’) shall be deducted from
equity. An entity’s own equity instruments are not recognised as a financial asset
regardless of the reason for which they are reacquired.
• Consideration received shall be recognised directly in equity.
• No gain or loss shall be recognised in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or
cancellation of an entity’s own equity instruments
In the consolidated financial statements, consideration for treasury shares acquired and
held by other members of the consolidated group, is deducted from equity.
• Transaction costs:
Equity transaction – accounted for as a deduction from equity to the extent they
are incremental costs directly attributable to the equity transaction that otherwise
would have been avoided. The costs of an equity transaction that is abandoned are
recognised as an expense.
• Changes in the fair value of an equity instrument are not recognised in the financial
statements.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 15
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
• Presentation:
♦ The amount of transaction costs accounted for as a deduction from equity in
the period is disclosed separately in accordance with Ind AS 1.
♦ Dividends classified as an expense may be presented in the statement of
comprehensive income either with interest on other liabilities or as a separate
item.
Applicability:
1. Financial Assets at Amortised Cost
2. Financial Assets at FVOCI (Debt), Impairment Loss transferred to P&L
3. Lease Receivable
4. Trade Receivable & Contract Receivable
Non – Applicability:
1. Financial Assets at FVTPL
2. Financial Assets at FVTOCI (Equity)
Approach
General Approach:
Stage I Stage II Stage III
No significant increase
Significant increase in Credit Risk
in Credit Risk
+ Credit Impaired
Impairment Loss 12 Month ECL Life Time ECL
Interest Recognition Gross Amount Gross Amount Net Amount
{Gross (-) Impairment
Loss}
FINANCIAL REPORTING 16
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Measure ‘12 -
No month expected
credit losses’
FINANCIAL REPORTING 17
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Estimated Total
Historic Estimated Present
per client estimated
Number per total gross value of
gross gross Loss
of clients annum carrying observed
carrying carrying rate
in sample average amount at loss
amount at amount at
defaults default assumed
default default
Group A B C=A×B D E=B×D F G=F÷C
X 1,000 CU 200 CU 2,00,000 4 CU 800 CU 600 0.3%
Y 1,000 CU 300 CU 3,00,000 2 CU 600 CU 450 0.15%
Features of Derivatives:-
1. Fair Value Changes in response to change in fair value of underlying.
2. No or Small initial investments.
3. Settled at future date.
Derivative Accounting
• Contracts to buy or sell non-financial items are outside the scope of ‘financial
instruments’, except for the following:
(a) Contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item that can be settled net in cash or
another financial instrument, with the exception of contracts that were
entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of the receipt or
delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the entity’s expected
purchase, sale or usage requirements.
(b) Such contract are irrevocably designated as measured at fair value through
profit or loss (even if it was entered into for the purpose of the receipt or
delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the entity’s expected
purchase, sale or usage requirements).
This designation is available only at inception of the contract and only if it
eliminates or significantly reduces a recognition inconsistency (sometimes
referred to as an ‘accounting mismatch’) that would otherwise arise from not
recognising that contract because it is excluded from the scope of this
Standard applying the scope exclusion in(a) above.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 18
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
(c) A written option to buy or sell a non-financial item that can be settled net in
cash or another financial instrument, or by exchanging financial instruments,
where such a contract was not entered into for the purpose of receipt or
delivery of the non-financial item in accordance with entity’s expected
purchase, sale or usage requirements.
For
ABC Ltd. enters into a contract to buy 100 tonnes of cocoa beans at 1,000 per tonne for
delivery in 12 months. On the settlement date, the market price for cocoa beans is
1,500 per tonne. If the contract cannot be settled net in cash and this contract is
entered for delivery of cocoa beans in line with ABC Ltd.’s expected purchase/ usage
requirements, then own use exemption applies. In such case, the contract is considered
to be an executor contract outside the scope of Ind AS 109 and hence, shall not be
accounted as a derivative.
Scope of Financial Instruments
Contract to buy or sell Non – Financial Items is outside the scope of IND AS 109.
However, if such contracts can be settled “NET”, then they are within the scope.
Exceptions: Contract to buy or sell Non – Financial Items in accordance with entity’s
usage requirement are outside the scope, provided there is no intention or past history
to settle net (Own Usage Exemption)
Note: The above exemption is not available to entity who is Writer of the Option.
Illustration 10
Entity XYZ enters into a fixed price forward contract to purchase one million
kilograms of copper in accordance with its expected usage requirements. The
contract permits XYZ to take physical delivery of the copper at the end of twelve
months or to pay or receive a net settlement in cash, based on the change in fair
value of copper. Is he contract accounted for as a derivative?
Solution:
While such a contract meets the definition of a derivative, it is not necessarily
accounted for as a derivative. The contract is a derivative instrument because
there is no initial net investment, the contract is based on the price of copper, and
it is to be settled at a future date. However, if XYZ intends to settle the contract
by taking delivery and has no history for similar contracts of setting net in cash or
of taking delivery of the copper and selling it within a short period after delivery
for the purpose of generating a profit from short – term fluctuating in price, the
contract is not accounted for as a derivative.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 19
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Illustration 11
A Entity XYZ owns an office building. XYZ enters into a put option with an investor
that permits XYZ to put the building to the investor for ` 150 million. The current
value of the building is ` 175 million. The option expires in five years. The option,
if exercised, may be settled through physical delivery or net cash, at XYZ’s options.
How do both XYZ and the investor account for the option?
Solution:
XYZ’s accounting depends on XYZ’s intention and past practice for settlement.
Although the contract meets the definition of a derivative, XYZ should not account
for it as a derivate if XYZ intends to settle the contract by delivering the building if
XYZ exercises its option and there is no past practise of setting net.
The investor, however, cannot conclude that the option was entered into to meet
the investor’s expected purchase, sale or usage requirements because the investor
does not have the ability to require delivery. In addition, the option may be settled
net in cash. Therefore, the investor has to account for the contract as a derivative.
Regardless of past practices, the investor does not affect whether settlement is by
delivery or in cash. The investor has written an option, and written option in which
the holder has a choice of physical settlement or net cash settlement can never
satisfy the normal delivery requirement for the exemption from Ind AS 109 because
the option writer does not have the ability to require delivery.
RECLASSIFICATION
Reclassification of financial assets is required if and only if the objective of the
entity’s business model for managing those financial assets changes.
Such changes are expected to be very infrequent and are determined by the
entity’s senior management as a result of internal or external changes and must be
significant to entity’s operations and demonstrable to external parties.
A change in the objective of an entity’s business model will occur only when an
entity either begins or ceases to carry out an activity that is significant to its
operations.
Reclassified to
Amortised Cost FVTOCI FVTPL
Amortised Recognise at fair Recognise at fair
Cost value and difference value with the
between fair value difference between
Reclassified
NA and closing amortised fair value and
from
cost is recognised in closing amortised
OCI. cost is recognised in
profit or loss.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 20
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Embedded Derivatives
FINANCIAL REPORTING 21
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Note 1: This implies that embedded derivatives are permitted to be separated from only
such hybrid contracts that contain a host which is either a (a) financial instrument
classified as financial liability or equity or compound; or (b) contract for purchase or
sale of a non financial item.
Note 2: If both the host and embedded derivative have economic characteristics of an
equity instrument, the hybrid instrument is not carried at fair value through profit or
loss. In other words, this measurement category is applicable only for host contracts
which are financial liabilities.
Question 12
Entity A (an INR functional currency entity) enters into a USD 1,000,000 sale
contract on 1January 20X1 with Entity B (an INR functional currency entity) to sell
equipment on 30 June20X1.
Spot rate on 1 January 20X1: INR/USD 45
Spot rate on 31 March 20X1: INR/USD 57
Three-month forward rate on 31 March 20X1: INR/USD 45
Six-month forward rate on 1 January 20X1: INR/USD 55
Spot rate on 30 June 20X1: INR/USD 60
Assume that this contract has an embedded derivative that is not closely related
and requires separation. Please provide detailed journal entries in the books of
Entity A for accounting of such embedded derivative until sale is actually made.
Solution:
The contract should be separated using the 6 month USD/INR forward exchange
rate, as at the date of the contract (INR/USD = 55). The two components of the
contract are therefore:
• A sale contract for INR 55 Million
• A six-month currency forward to purchase USD 1 Million at 55
• This gives rise to a gain or loss on the derivative, and a corresponding
derivative asset or liability.
On delivery
(1) Entity A records the sales at the amount of the host contract = INR 55 Million
(2) The embedded derivative is considered to expire.
(3) The derivative asset or liability (i.e. the cumulative gain or loss) is settled by
becoming part of the financial asset on delivery.
(4) In this case the carrying value of the currency forward at 30 June 20X1 on
maturity is =INR (1,000,000 x 60 – 55 x 1,000,000) = ` 5,000,000 (profit/asset)
FINANCIAL REPORTING 22
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
The table summarising the computation of gain/ loss to be recorded at every
period end –
Derivative
Date Transaction Sales Debtors Asset (Profit) Loss
(Liability)
INR INR INR INR
1-Jan-20X1 Embedded Derivative Nil Value
31-Mar-20X1 Change in Fair Value of (10,000,000) 10,000,000
Embedded Derivatives
MTM (55-45) x 1 Million
30-Jun-20X1 Change in Fair Value of 15,000,000 (15,000,000)
Embedded Derivatives
(60-45) x1 Million
30-Jun-20X1 Recording sales at (55,000,000) 55,000,000
forward rate
30-Jun-20X1 Embedded derivative- 5,000,000 (5,000,000)
settled against debtors
c. 30 June 20X1 –
Dr. Amount Cr. Amount
Particulars
(`) (`)
Derivative financial assetA/c Dr. 5,000,000
Derivative financial liabilityA/c Dr. 10,000,000
To Profit and loss A/c 15,000,000
(being gain on embedded derivative based on spot
rate at the date of settlement booked)
d. 30 June 20X1 –
Dr. Amount Cr. Amount
Particulars
(`) (`)
FINANCIAL REPORTING 23
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Trade receivable A/c Dr. 55,000,000
To Sales A/c 55,000,000
(being sale booked at forward rate on the date of
transaction)
e. 30 June 20X1 –
Dr. Amount Cr. Amount
Particulars
(`) (`)
Trade receivable A/c Dr. 5,000,000
To Derivative financial asset A/c 5,000,000
(being derivative asset re-classified as a part of trade
receivables, bringing it to spot rate on the date of sale)
Question 13
Company A, an Indian company whose functional currency is `, enters into a
contract to purchase machinery from an unrelated local supplier, company B. The
functional currency of company B is also `. However, the contract is denominated
in USD, since the machinery issourced by company B from a US based supplier.
Payment is due to company B on delivery of the machinery.
Key terms of the contract:
Contractual features Details
Contract/order date 9 September 20X1
Delivery/payment date 31 December 20X1
Purchase price USD 1,000,000
USD/` Forward rate on 9 September 20X1 for 31 December 20X1 67.8
maturity
USD/` Spot rate on 9 September 20X1 66.4
USD/` Forward rates for 31 December, on: 30 September 67.5
31 December (spot rate) 67.0
Company A is required to analyse if the contract for purchase of machinery (a
capital asset)from company B contains an embedded derivative and whether this
should be separately accounted for on the basis of the guidance in Ind AS 109. Also
give necessary journal entries for accounting the same.
Solution:
Based on the guidance above, the USD contract for purchase of machinery entered
into by company A includes an embedded foreign currency derivative due to the
following reasons:
FINANCIAL REPORTING 24
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
The host contract is a purchase contract (non-financial in nature) that is not
classified as, or measured at FVTPL.
The embedded foreign currency feature (requirement to settle the contract
by payment of USD at a future date) meets the definition of a stand-alone
derivative – it is akin to a USD-` forward contract maturing on 31 December
20X1.
USD is not the functional currency of either of the substantial parties to the
contract (i.e., neither company A nor company B).
Machinery is not routinely denominated in USD in commercial transactions
around the world. In this context, an item or a commodity may be considered
‘routinely denominated’ in a particular currency only if such currency was
used in a large majority of similar commercial transactions around the world.
For example, transactions in crude oil are generally considered routinely
denominated in USD. A transaction for acquiring machinery in this illustration
would generally not qualify for this exemption.
USD is not a commonly used currency for domestic commercial transactions in
the economic environment in which either company A or B operate. This
exemption generally applies when the business practice in a particular
economic environment is to use amore stable or liquid foreign currency (such
as the USD), rather than the local currency, for a majority of internal or cross-
border transactions, or both. In the illustration above, companies A and B are
companies operating in India and the purchase contract is an
internal/domestic transaction. USD is not a commonly used currency for
internal trade within this economic environment and therefore the contract
would not qualify for this exemption.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 25
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Accounting treatment:
Amount Amount
Date Particulars
(`) (`)
09-Sep-X1 On initial recognition of the forward contract
(No accounting entry recognised since initial Nil Nil
fair value of the forward contract is considered
to be nil)
30-Sep-X1 Fair value change in forward contract
Derivative asset Dr. 3,00,000
[(67.8-67.5) x10,00,000]
To Profit or loss 3,00,000
31-Dec-X1 Fair value change in forward contract
Derivative asset Dr. 5,00,000
[{(67.8-67) x 10,00,000} - 3,00,000]
To Profit or loss 5,00,000
31-Dec-X1 Recognition of machinery acquired and on
settlement
Property, plant and equipment Dr. 6,78,00,000
(at forward rate)
To Derivative asset 8,00,000
To Creditor (company B) / Bank 6,70,00,000
Question 14
On 1st April, 20X1, Makers Ltd. raised a long term loan from foreign investors. The
investors subscribed for 6 million Foreign Currency (FCY) loan notes at par. It
incurred incremental issue costs of FCY 2,00,000. Interest of FCY 6,00,000 is
payable annually on 31st March, starting from 31st March, 20X2. The loan is
repayable in FCY on 31st March, 20X7 at a premium and the effective annual
interest rate implicit in the loan is 12%. The appropriate measurement basis for this
loan is amortised cost. Relevant exchange rates are as follows:
• 1st April, 20X1 - FCY 1 = ` 2.50.
• 31st March, 20X2 – FCY 1 = ` 2.75.
• Average rate for the year ended 31st Match, 20X2 – FCY 1 = ` 2.42. The
functional currency of the group is Indian Rupee.
What would be the appropriate accounting treatment for the foreign currency loan
in the books of Makers Ltd. for the FY 20X1-20X2? Calculate the initial
measurement amount for the loan, finance cost for the year, closing balance and
exchange gain / loss.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 26
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Question 15
An Indian entity, whose functional currency is rupees, purchases USD dominated
bond at its fair value of USD 1,000. The bond carries stated interest @ 4.7% p.a. on
its face value. The said interest is received at the year end. The bond has maturity
FV 1250
period of 5 years and is redeemable at its face value of USD 1,250. The fair value
of the bond at the end of year 1is USD 1,060. The exchange rate on the date of
transaction and at the end of year 1 are USD1 = ` 40 and USD 1 = ` 45, respectively.
The weighted average exchange rate for the year is1 USD = ` 42.
The entity has determined that it is holding the bond as part of an investment
portfolio whose objective is met both by holding the asset to collect contractual
cash flows and selling the asset. The purchased USD bond is to be classified under
the FVTOCI category.
The bond results in effective interest rate (EIR) of 10% p.a. IRR always use USD Amount
Calculate gain or loss to be recognised in Profit & Loss and Other Comprehensive
Income for year 1. Also pass journal entry to recognise gain or loss on above.
(Round off the figures to nearest rupees)
Question 16
An entity purchases a debt instrument with a fair value of ` 1,000 on 15thMarch,
20X1 and measures the debt instrument at fair value through other comprehensive
income. The instrument has an interest rate of 5% over the contractual term of 10
years, and has a 5% effective interest rate. At initial recognition, the entity
determines that the asset is not a purchased or original credit-impaired asset.
On 31st March 20X1 (the reporting date), the fair value of the debt instrument has
decreased to ` 950 as a result of changes in market interest rates. The entity
determines that there has not been a significant increase in credit risk since initial
recognition and that ECL should be measured at an amount equal to 12 month ECL,
which amounts to ` 30.
On 1st April 20X1, the entity decides to sell the debt instrument for ` 950, which is
its fair value at that date.
Pass journal entries for recognition, impairment and sale of debt instruments as
per Ind AS 109. Entries relating to interest income are not to be provided.
Question 17
ABC Company issued 10,000 compulsory cumulative convertible preference shares
(CCCPS) as on 1 April 20X1 @ ` 150 each. The rate of dividend is 10% payable every
year. The preference shares are convertible into 5,000 equity shares of the
company at the end of 5th year from the date of allotment. When the CCCPS are
issued, the prevailing market interest rate for similar debt without conversion
options is 15% per annum. Transaction cost on the date of issuance is 2% of the
value of the proceeds.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 27
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Key terms:
Date of Allotment 01-Apr-20X1
Date of Conversion 01-Apr-20X6
Number of Preference Shares 10,000
Face Value of Preference Shares 150
Total Proceeds 15,00,000
Rate Of dividend 10%
Market Rate for Similar Instrument 15%
Transaction Cost 30,000
Face value of equity share after conversion 10
Number of equity shares to be issued 5,000
Solution:
This is a compound financial instrument with two components – liability
representing present value of future cash outflows and balance represents equity
component.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 28
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
c. Accounting for liability at amortised cost:
• Initial accounting = Present value of cash outflows less transaction costs
• Subsequent accounting = At amortised cost, ie, initial fair value adjusted
for interest and repayments of the liability.
FINANCIAL REPORTING 29
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
“If you want light to come into your life, you need to
stand where it is shining.”
FINANCIAL REPORTING 30
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)
CA FINAL
Notes
FINANCIAL REPORTING 31
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(IND AS 32, 107, 109)