Joshua Craze - March 2025 HSBA Briefing Paper - On The Brink - The Politics of Violence in South Sudan
Joshua Craze - March 2025 HSBA Briefing Paper - On The Brink - The Politics of Violence in South Sudan
March 2025
HSBA
ON THE BRINK
The Politics of Violence in South Sudan
Joshua Craze
On the Brink 1
Credits and About the author
contributors Joshua Craze is a writer with more than a decade of experience conducting research
in Sudan and South Sudan. His essays are published in the New York Review of
Books and the New Left Review, among many other publications. He is finishing
a book for Fitzcarraldo Editions on war and bureaucracy in South Sudan.
Copy-editor:
Alessandra Allen
Proofreader:
Stephanie Huitson
Design and layout:
Rick Jones
Cartography:
Jillian Luff, MAPgrafix
On the Brink 3
intelligence, who is a sworn enemy of A productive non-election to be undertaken, and security sector
Akol Koor.9 On 26 November, South reform (SSR) arrangements, which were
Sudanese traders fled markets in Juba In 2018, South Sudan’s civil war (2013–18) supposed to create a unified army, had
amid rumours—denied by the SSPDF— ended with the Revitalized Agreement still not been finalized. All these delays
that Babanen had been dismissed. At the on the Resolution of the Conflict in the exasperated the international community.
end of November, many feared South Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS). For the Troika, elections were the sine
Sudan was about to explode. Yet the That agreement created a transitional qua non of the peace agreement, and
bomb never went off (see Map 1 for government and stipulated that elections the further extension was bewailed as a
information on armed groups' control would be held in 2022. Over the next collective failure of South Sudan’s lead-
and activity as of December 2024). four years, little was done to implement ership (Troika, 2024).11 The government
In 2005, a strong Sudan People’s the agreement, and in February 2022 blamed the delay on South Sudan’s ailing
Liberation Movement (SPLM) and a the government delayed elections until economy, with the minister of cabinet
diverse set of security actors could act December 2024. On 13 September 2024, affairs Martin Elia Lomuro citing a lack
as a check on Kiir’s power. Since the the South Sudanese government once of funds as the primary reason for not
fracturing of the Sudan People’s Libera- again delayed elections, extending the having held elections as planned (Radio
tion Movement/Army-in-Opposition transitional period for a further two Tamazuj, 2024a).12
(SPLM/A-IO), there has been no viable years. In some senses, this was 2022, Neither the Troika’s nor Lomuro’s
alternative to the system of patronage redux. From 2018 to 2024, implementa- position is particularly edifying. One
constructed around Kiir. The system tion of the peace agreement proceeded presumes a lack of government will; the
created by Kiir’s mode of rule, as this at a glacial pace. By the time the second other presumes that the government is
Briefing Paper will show, prevented extension was announced, more than six willing, but lacks the resources to hold
the electoral process and blocked the years after the signing of the R-ARCSS, elections. What these positions occlude
Tumaini Peace Initiative. Its true cost the South Sudanese constitution had is that the South Sudanese government
will only be felt when Kiir is gone.10 still not been drafted, a census had yet has considerable political will, along
Notes: CAR = Central African Republic; DRC = Democratic Republic of the Congo; RAA = Ruweng Administrative Area; SSUF/A = South Sudan United Front Army;
SLA-AW = Sudan Liberation Army-Abdul Wahid.
On the Brink 5
allocation, including the disbursement of opposition groups from holding rallies The Tumaini Peace
humanitarian resources.20 Determining or building up a base of support (UNHRC,
and demarcating constituency boundaries 2023, pp. 23–24). Machar’s official posi- Initiative
would also be difficult. In both Warrap tion was to call for the full implementa- One of the only ways to justify an exten-
(Craze, 2022b; Pendle, 2014) and Upper tion of the peace agreement, including sion acceptable to the international com-
Nile states (Craze, 2019; Pritchard, 2020), the long-delayed creation of a national munity would have been to integrate the
for instance, borders imposed by top- army, but such a position masked his hold-out groups and dissident politicians
down, state-driven processes have desire to avoid elections in toto. Other that had not signed the R-ARCSS into
created intergroup conflict. These struc- opposition groups had similar qualms: the Revitalized Government of National
tural political problems, almost impossi- the SSOA and the Other Political Parties Unity (R-TGoNU).24 The hold-out groups
ble to address, could have been resolved (OPP) had no ground operations that would then have needed to disarm and
by simply ignoring them. Senior members would have allowed them to contest elec- form political parties before elections
of the SPLM stated that an election with- tions, and would have lost the positions could be held. Several of these hold-out
out a permanent constitution or a census guaranteed to them by the R-ARCSS. groups, including the National Salvation
would have been possible (UNSC, 2024a, Even more substantively, it was parts Front (NAS) of Thomas Cirillo, Pagan
p. 8). While such an election would not of Kiir’s coalition that resisted elections. Amum’s Real-SPLM, and Paul Malong
have met international standards of best Like the SSOA and the OPP, many SPLM Awan’s South Sudan United Front, had
practice, it would, nonetheless, have politicians lacked local legitimacy, and been involved in intermittent talks with
been an election. feared that elections would spell the end the South Sudanese government, held in
The more determinant obstacle to of their time in power. Explicitly coming Rome under the auspices of Sant’Egidio,
elections lay not in the practical prob- out against the elections, however, was a Catholic lay association. Kiir’s regime
lems posed by the process but rather in not politically possible: they were the used these talks as an opportunity to
the system that had ensured Kiir’s rule horizon against which South Sudanese try to split the opposition by opening
since 2018. Many members of the tran- politics was being organized. Instead, up separate negotiating channels with
sitional government were well aware under the cover of delays, the electoral individual rebels—most notably with
that they risked losing all their privileges process was left to atrophy. While key Malong. The government withdrew from
if an election were to take place. No one pieces of legislation were signed into the Rome talks in March 2023, in theory
stood to lose more than Machar. The law—such as the National Elections Act due to a disagreement over the agenda.
SPLM/A-IO was initially a Nuer force, and the Political Parties Act—the forma- In December 2023, the South Suda-
which gave form to the widespread tion of these reconstituted electoral nese government surprised Sant’Egidio
community anger that had ensued after bodies proceeded at a snail’s pace and by asking the Kenyan president, William
the Juba massacres of December 2013 they were given no money to carry out Ruto, to host talks with the hold-out
(AUCISS, 2014). It was initially almost their responsibilities. Their staff remained groups. For Ruto, holding the talks in
entirely led by Nuer commanders who unpaid and it was almost impossible for Nairobi was part of a broader effort to
had previously served with the South opposition groups to register themselves position Kenya as the region’s diplo-
Sudan Defence Forces (SSDF) of Paulino as political parties.23 matic epicentre, and consolidate links
Matiep (Young, 2006; 2015; 2016). By This left Kiir in a contradictory posi- between Kenya and South Sudan. For
2022, most of these commanders had tion. He would have personally benefited Kiir, moving the talks to Nairobi allowed
left the SPLM/A-IO, dissatisfied with from elections; however, while the system him to sideline Cirillo, who was not will-
Machar’s leadership, while many of the created by the R-ARCSS had enabled ing to come to the Kenyan capital, whence
rank-and-file of the SPLM/A-IO felt that him to fragment the political class, and the NSS had abducted dissidents as
the leadership of the organization had so dominate it, this had left individual recently as 2023 (Amnesty International,
betrayed its communitarian roots. Machar politicians dependent on his largesse 2023). Kiir hoped that sidelining Cirillo
would continue to lose both commanders and the positions allocated to them would lead to the hold-out groups aban-
and popularity over the next two years, under the terms of the peace agreement. doning demands to fundamentally change
including—humiliatingly—the defection This meant Kiir was surrounded by five the structure of his regime, while allow-
of Simon Maguek Gai in Leer town in vice presidents and any number of politi- ing him to absorb some rebel leaders—
October 2023.21 To the extent that it had cians invested in maintaining the system notably Amum, Stephen Buay Rolnyang
managed to build a party outside Nuer enabled by the R-ARCSS. Although Kiir (Buay), and Malong—into government.
territory, by 2022, the SPLM-IO was ultimately determines the fate of these Several months of shuttle diplomacy
largely composed of politicians who had figures, he does so within a system in ensued between Nairobi and Juba. Ruto
opportunistically used their membership which he must constantly balance rival- assigned the retired general Lazaro
to gain access to political power. For rous politicians, and in which he is ulti- Sumbeiywo to oversee the initiative:
instance, diaspora politicians in Warrap mately dependent on his coalition in Sumbeiywo had previously served as
without a hope of obtaining a place within order to rule. Rather than come out Kenya’s special envoy (1997–98) to Inter-
the SPLM returned to the state in 2020–22 against the elections, this coalition governmental Authority on Development
to take advantage of positions proffered killed the electoral process by allowing (IGAD)-led talks designed to end the
by the SPLM-IO, in the full knowledge it to sink into a morass of delays and a second Sudanese civil war, before becom-
that their sinecures depended on the lack of funding. Delays were once again ing a mediator in the negotiations that led
continuation of transitional arrangements politically expedient—if not for Kiir, then to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement
(Craze, 2022b, pp. 29–30).22 for the political elite on which his rule (CPA) in 2005. He thus carried symbolic
The SPLM-IO was keenly aware that depends. By the end of 2023, it was weight, and knew many of the participants
it would have overwhelmingly lost the increasingly apparent that the elections in what was christened the Tumaini Peace
elections postulated for December 2024, scheduled for December 2024 would Initiative, after the Swahili word for hope.
especially as the SPLM was holding the not occur, and Kiir began looking for an The initiative launched on 9 May 2024,
country’s purse strings and preventing escape route. with Ruto pressuring Kiir to attend.
On the Brink 7
At the beginning of 2024, external sponsorship: the SPLM/A relied
on Ethiopian and Soviet support in the
1980s, while the SSDF had backing from
Kiir hoped his absorption of the Khartoum. The regional realignment
expressed by the R-ARCSS, which was
overseen by both Kampala and Khartoum,
opposition would soon include meant opposition forces could not find
support outside South Sudan’s borders.
Peace Initiative. Kiir’s strategy, flict inside the country to those very
rebel groups: witness his use of Shilluk
commander Johnson Olonyi’s forces,
however, was not well received by the Agwelek, to fight both the SPLA-IO
and Gatwich’s Kitgwang in Upper Nile
(Small Arms Survey, 2023a).
Amum, Buay, and Malong.” By mid-2023, the geopolitical situa-
tion had changed. The war in Sudan
meant there was the possibility of one or
the other side supporting rebel groups
Ghazal native as his successor. This was Khartoum, would also serve as a check inside South Sudan; Buay’s forces had
not the first time Kiir had been concerned on the former members of Bashir’s fought for the RSF, as had small numbers
about Akol Koor. He had previously tried National Congress Party (NCP), such as of Malong’s forces.37 Furthermore, in order
to limit Akol Koor’s power in 2020 by Tut Kew Gatluak, who, in May 2023, still to have elections, Kiir needed at least
dismissing him from his informal posi- played an important role in Kiir’s regime.35 the appearance of stability within South
tion on the Nilepet board and promoting Tut Kew had a fractious but effective Sudan: too much open conflict would
Nhial Deng Nhial to the position of min- alliance with the then-governor of Unity have made the electoral process impos-
ister of presidential affairs, in order to state, Nguen Monytuil, who was a former sible. Commanders such as Olonyi, and
create a counterweight to Akol Koor’s member of Matiep’s SSDF, backed by minor renegade generals such as Dickson
powerbase in his home state of Warrap.33 Khartoum (Craze and Tubiana, 2016; Gatluak, were effectively bought off and
He also instructed Bol Akot Bol, a Renk Small Arms Survey, 2023c), until Nguen’s then warehoused in Juba, under house
Dinka general, to use a disarmament cam- dismissal in May 2024. Buay, who had arrest—their political and military powers
paign in Tonj East county as a facade to always remained within the SPLA, and neutralized (Craze, 2024a).38
go after fighters supported by Akol Koor had not rebelled until 2021, is a popular At the beginning of 2024, Kiir hoped
(Craze, 2022b, pp. 32–38), while simul- Bul Nuer commander with political ambi- his absorption of the opposition would
taneously building up SSPDF Military tions. He would have enabled Kiir to limit soon include the participants of the
Intelligence under Rin Tueny Mabor Deng the power of the Bul Nuer power bloc that Tumaini Peace Initiative. Kiir’s strategy,
as a counterweight to the NSS. The dis- surrounded Tut Kew and Nguen.36 The however, was not well received by Amum,
armament campaign failed. Powerbrokers alignment of this bloc with the govern- Buay, and Malong. The hold-out groups
in the SPLM, including Kuol Manyang, ment during the South Sudanese civil looked dimly on the prospect of returning
began to positioned Nhial as a replace- war had enabled it to maintain control of to Juba, only to find themselves remote
ment for Kiir; Nhial was then removed, Unity state (Craze and Tubiana, 2016). from real power, given meaningless
and Akol Koor restored. After his restora- During the transitional period, this same sinecures and effectively kept under
tion, Akol Koor’s power grew, especially bloc had entrenched Kiir’s connection to house arrest—the fate of both Machar
in Warrap: he was responsible for the Khartoum. With elections anticipated, and Olonyi. Despite their potential
2022 dismissal of Aleu Anyieny Aleu as however, figures such as Tut Kew had usefulness to Kiir, this fate could not be
the state governor and his replacement become increasingly unpopular, and a ruled out, and was far from the radical
with Manheim Bol Malek (Craze, 2023d).34 shift within the ruling coalition to legacy reform of R-ARCSS that the hold-out
In May 2024, the return of Malong was SPLM/A figures, who fought during the groups had envisaged.
considered as a means of blocking Akol second civil war, would likely have been Kiir’s plan also faced opposition in
Koor’s power. positively received, especially among Juba. The integration of the participants
The other figures that Kiir wished to the SPLM/A old guard of Jonglei and in the Tumaini talks into the government
bring into government would also have Warrap states. threatened the political compact created
allowed him to marginalize enemies in These projected pivots were part of by the R-ARCSS, just as the prospect of
Juba. While Amum, the Shilluk politician, a changing strategy for Kiir’s regime. elections had done. This opposition was
no longer has a popular constituency in During the initial transitional period, Kiir intensified by the actions of the partici-
Upper Nile, he remains a potent figure had focused on splitting the opposition pants in the talks: the hold-out groups
within the SPLM, and is a potential by creating divisions in rebel groups and and the Kenyan mediation stretched the
counterweight to the minister of cabinet setting politicians against each other. The negotiations to encompass a far more
affairs, Lomuro (Craze, 2019, p. 30), as opposition, without the sort of external radical agenda than that envisaged in
well as a viable secretary general for the supplies—in terms of money and materiel Juba. The opposition even proposed sub-
SPLM. Amum, who had always been one —that could attract popular support, suming the R-ARCSS into the Tumaini
of the ‘Garangists’ most loyal to John found itself unable to constitute a viable Peace Initiative. Its position was that,
Garang’s vision of a New Sudan, and alternative order. Historically, opposition given that the transitional process had
implacably opposed to the regime in forces in southern Sudan have needed not borne fruit in Juba, matters such as
On the Brink 9
Border communities reliant on trade interests in Kafia Kingi, in the contested Kiir’s regime—none of which have been
with the north have seen the flow of border zone. Western Bahr el Ghazal rep- honoured. Giving up Gatwich costs SAF
essential goods reduced to a trickle resents an important nexus for the war little—there is no shortage of desperate
(Majok, 2024; REACH, 2024), increasing economy: gold flows south, to Kampala South Sudanese rebels in the border
their dependence on flows of Ugandan and Juba, with regular flights leaving Wau zone ready to receive Sudanese succour
commodities from a remote Juba. For the for both cities, while fuel goes north. if they need to find spoilers—and they are
elite in the capital, inured to these scar- While connections to the RSF have relatively certain of Kiir’s loyalty, espe-
cities, the most damaging consequence proved profitable for some in Kiir’s cially given SAF’s recent successes on
of the war thus far was the February 2024 circles, they also pose risks. Kiir is the battlefield. For Gatwich, though,
rupture of the pipeline that carried South walking a delicate tightrope over the the agreement represents a path into
Sudan’s heavy Dar Blend crude oil north war in Sudan, and attempting to appease ignominy: the last deputy commander-in-
to Port Sudan, reducing South Sudan’s three sides. When Abdel Fattah al-Burhan chief was Matiep, who took the position
exports from 150,000 barrels per day to visited Juba in September 2024, he came in 2006, only to find himself remote from
just 45,000 (UNSC, 2024b).43 The remain- with several demands.44 Most press power and far from his troops. The posi-
ing pipeline carries Nile Blend and runs ingly, he asked for the cross-border tion was retired after Matiep’s death, but
from Unity state through to Khartoum, trade with the RSF to stop. Kiir gave an then reintroduced for Gatwich; he is not
where it meets and runs alongside the order halting dozens of trucks in Aweil wrong to feel foreboding.
first pipeline, all the way to Port Sudan; from going north, but this was a pause, Kiir must, however, appease not only
oil from the Unity pipeline is usually not a cessation. In a situation of eco- SAF, but also the RSF. Some of the areas
allocated to Bol Mel’s companies, as nomic crisis, Kiir does not have the through which both the Dar Blend and
part of the oil-for-roads programme, capacity to order the elite to stop trading Nile Blend pipelines travel are controlled
which is intended to get oil revenues with the RSF. by the paramilitary group. On 1 November
off the book and into the pockets of Nonetheless, Kiir’s first loyalty is to 2024, Kiir’s regime made an agreement
selected members of the elite surround- the SAF regime in Port Sudan. Without with the RSF to protect a 237-km stretch
ing Kiir as quickly as possible (Craze, it, he has no capacity to export oil, of pipeline that passes through their
2023a; UNSC, 2023). The shut-off of the as such exports must run through the territory. Kiir cannot definitively shut
Dar Blend pipeline has meant that the Red Sea port and, given the current down cross-border trade with the RSF:
government is largely denuded of funds. crisis in the RSF—both military and his control of politics in Juba has partly
The 2024–25 budget is only half funded. political—the paramilitary force cannot been achieved by outsourcing revenue
A third of that budget is dedicated to be expected to expand into eastern collection and economic activity to locally
salaries, with around 70% of this funding Sudan in the near future (Craze and empowered actors, as the Small Arms
the security sector (UNSC, 2024b). The Makawi, 2025).45 Moreover, the SAF Survey explored in a previous Briefing
consequences? Discontented soldiers, regime provides the blueprint for Kiir’s Paper (Craze, 2023a). The regime in Juba
politicians excluded from the coterie model of government. Finally, a shift to lacks the absolute strength to block
around Bol Mel clamouring for petro the RSF could potentially result in an cross-border trade from which some of
dollars to be reallocated to salaries, and external backer for rebel groups inside the elite profits. Finally, just as with SAF,
a dramatic worsening of the economic South Sudan—an outcome that Kiir has a definitive move against the RSF would
situation in Juba. assiduously avoided. invite retaliation, and the paramilitary
For the elite, the war has nonetheless Negotiations in Port Sudan in the group has already sponsored militias
offered opportunities for economic second half of 2024 and into 2025 saw present inside South Sudan. Buay’s
enrichment. In Northern Bahr el Ghazal, Kiir bring one potential spoiler into the SSPM has already fought with the RSF at
traders now bring commodities from government fold. In talks conducted with Babanusa, as have other opportunistic
Juba and sell them to Sudanese custom- the then-chief of the NSS, Akec Tong commanders, looking for weapons and
ers, in a reverse of customary flows, which Aleu, at the beginning of February 2025, payment. For Kiir, the most appealing
saw the northern state reliant on goods Gatwich agreed to a deal that would diplomatic position is to remain neutral,
from Sudan. Fuel is the most lucrative see him become the deputy commander- while engaging with both groups.
market, and the best customer is the in-chief of the SSPDF, with his forces The possibility of hold-out groups
RSF, installed at Raiq Mandalla—some integrated into the army. Whether the currently outside the ambit of Kiir’s
10 km north of Kiir Adem (Majok, 2024). deal actually comes to pass remains regime making common cause with the
While the state government formally uncertain; Gatwich signed the agree- RSF increases the paramilitary group’s
banned the export of fuel to Sudan in ment under pressure from Ahmed potential to unsettle the fragile compact
November 2023, this has made little Ibrahim Mufadal, the director of Sudan’s in South Sudan. A further reason for the
difference to current flows: the RSF is General Intelligence Service, which Tumaini Peace Initiative was to pull those
desperate for fuel, and the traders for offered Gatwich as part of a package groups closer to Kiir’s coalition, and out
dollars. Flowing south, alongside refu- deal. In return for Gatwich’s return to of the reach of the RSF: if such groups are
gees and returnees, is war loot, including South Sudan, Kiir offered SAF the possi- given sinecures in Juba, they are much
sheet metal, and a flourishing trade in bility of moving troops and materiel less likely to be recruited as spoilers. In
stolen cars destined for Juba (Craze, through South Sudan to its beleaguered Nairobi, hold-out groups have already
2024a, p. 6). All these goods flow into a bases in South and West Kordofan, which approached the RSF for materiel and
militarized border economy. otherwise lack supply routes to SAF- funds. The RSF, however, is leery of
In Western Bahr el Ghazal, there is controlled territories in Sudan. Tong moving against Kiir’s regime. There is
also a lucrative border trade with the Aleu’s subsequent dismissal, however, no shortage of desperate recruits inside
RSF. The RSF purchases goods and fuel has given Gatwich and the SPLA-IO- Sudan and, in October–November 2024,
in both Wau, the state capital, and Raga Kitgwang pause. The February 2025 the RSF went on an extensive recruitment
county, before returning to Sudan. The agreement is only the latest of several drive in Darfur and West Kordofan. It can
paramilitary group also has gold mining agreements that Gatwich has signed with also recruit among South Sudanese
country.”
ing to be drawn into backing either side
in the civil war to his north. This would
further enable him to maintain his con-
nections to the Sudan People’s Liberation
Army-North (SPLA-N), under Abdelaziz
dollars, donor funds, and international SPLM began to break apart and become
Al-Hilu, which maintains residences in
good will into Juba gave rise to dreams a site merely for political competition
Juba and moves supplies through South
of a regional economic powerhouse and for positions, with discussion and dis-
Sudan. A part of this balancing act will be
a liberal democratic state (Craze, 2021; sent stifled.
to work out a political agreement with SAF
Thomas, 2015). During this period, the It is this disintegration of the South
and the RSF if and when the Dar Blend
SPLM was still a significant political force, Sudanese nationalist project that created
pipeline is restarted: a cash-strapped
and the economic situation enabled the the backdrop to the civil war that began
SAF, largely dependent on Qatari funds
growth of a nascent national bureaucracy in 2013. The SPLA had been fractured
for liquidity, has asked for a higher transit
(Markó, 2015). There was an immense by Kiir’s ‘big tent’ policy of 2005–06,
fee, while the RSF has also demanded a feeling of optimism about South Sudan, which had brought in militias formerly
share of the pipeline fees. RSF officials most fundamentally among South Suda- backed by Khartoum, and turned the
have also asked South Sudan to cut off nese refugees returning to the country, army into a collection of fractious com-
payments to Burhan’s government by ready to make a new life. manders, each in charge of their own
placing the transit-related fees in an For the international community, individual forces. In response, govern-
escrow account until the war ends— optimism in Juba proved a means of ment elites, lacking any confidence in
a non-starter for SAF. These demands ignoring the disintegration occurring a fractured army, built up mono-ethnic
are bargaining attempts by the RSF to across much of the country, fuelled by militia forces, such as the Mathiang
drive up the price it can extract for guar- the very processes of state-building that Anyoor (Boswell, 2019). The ethniciza-
anteeing pipeline security. Despite these were supposed to render South Sudan tion of military force in South Sudan,
entrenched interests, a deal is likely to a successful country. A military class, and the growth of militias with direct
be found. All sides will benefit from the which had initially emerged during the relations to political actors operating
resumption of oil flow, just as all sides second Sudanese civil war on the back outside the ambit of the formal state,
have benefited from the war: livestock of militarized kinship networks and set the stage for a civil war (Craze, 2020)
exports to the Gulf from Sudan are at an the appropriation of external flows of that began as part of a zero-sum com-
all-time high, thanks to collusion between humanitarian aid and materiel, grasped petition between elite politicians for
SAF and the RSF, while, in South Sudan, hold of flows of petrodollars and donor control of the patrimonial machine Kiir
the elite enriches itself through backroom funds (Craze, 2023a; Pinaud, 2014). It had constructed, but soon spiralled into
deals with the paramilitaries (Duffield maintained its power in Juba by using a more chaotic conflict.
and Stockton, 2024; Thomas, 2024). political positions as sinecures; elites During the civil war, the fragmenta-
In these joint economic activities, the outside the Juba compact leveraged tion of South Sudan continued apace.
warring elites of both countries are not violence in the peripheries to bid for While Western diplomats often depicted
opposed, but unified. positions in the centre (Craze, 2022a). the war as a conflict between two bellig-
In the periphery, the militarization of erent parties—the SPLA and the SPLA-IO
ethnic and kinship ties—already a feature —in reality, both sides were collections
South Sudan in fragments of the second civil war (Craze, 2022b;
Pinaud, 2016)—continued apace. This
of actors invested in local struggles but
in need of national support and flows of
In retrospect, the six years that followed led to a disintegration of both vernacu- materiel and material. Actors joined the
the signing of the CPA, prior to inde- lar and formal institutions: customary SPLA and SPLA-IO as a means of access-
pendence, were banner years for South authorities increasingly became sub- ing these flows. It was such rebranding
Sudanese nationalism. Flows of petro- ject to government control, while the of local struggles as part of a national
On the Brink 11
Map 2 Armed clashes in South Sudan, 2018–24
conflict—and the recognition later Such fragmentation has produced increasingly ethnicized competitions
bestowed on these contingent coalitions conflict across the country. In 2023, for political positions and resources,
by the R-ARCSS—that gave the illusion a Small Arms Survey Briefing Paper inflamed by politicians in Juba using
of unity to a fragmented conflict. included a map of the conflicts that violence as a means of competing
The peace agreement consolidated have occurred in South Sudan since the for influence—such as in Western
the lineaments of the wartime system signing of the R-ARCSS in 2018 (Craze, Equatoria and Upper Nile;
(Craze and Markó, 2022). A fractious 2023a).46 Map 2 is an updated version, clashes between groups that make
political elite competed for positions illustrating how conflict has continued zero-sum bids for territory and
within a centralized dictatorship in to spread across the country. In 2024 humanitarian resources, in a situa-
Juba, while the peripheries of the coun- and 2025, contentions over resources tion in which co-existence, given
try fought for representation on the and SSPDF atrocities against civilians the nature of the South Sudanese
basis of ethnic and sectional identity. pitted the Nuer White Army against state, is almost impossible—such
The formation of administrative areas government forces and allied militias in as the Twic–Ngok conflict in Abyei
for the Murle (the Greater Pibor Admin- Nasir, while an ethnicized contention (Craze, 2023b);
istrative Area, or GPAA) and the Padang over military positions in Pochalla led to
Dinka of Unity state (RAA) is exemplary the SSPDF committing widespread atroci- government-backed forces clashing
of a broader trend: during fieldwork ties against the Anuak. In December with hold-out groups, the SPLA-IO,
undertaken from 2018 to 2024, almost 2024, clashes were ongoing, once again, or NAS—such as Central Equatoria
every ethnic group demanded its own in Tambura county, Western Equatoria, and Unity states; and
administrative area, as the national com- between the Balanda and the Azande community resistance to government-
pact fragmented and political power, (Craze, 2023c), while conflict had not backed encroachment (from both
on the ground, became understood as a ceased in Warrap state. Conceptually, Juba and Uganda) on their territory—
series of sinecures to be competed over one can discern four types of conflict such as Eastern Equatoria state and
by ethnic groups. currently scarring South Sudan: Nasir, Upper Nile.
On the Brink 13
The elite around Kiir have Conclusion
John Garang, the original leader of the
On the Brink 15
showed no growth since 2008. The 32 Akeen was removed as governor of North- further south, near the frontline between
numbers provided by the UNFPA were ern Bahr el Ghazal in June 2024, and SAF and the RSF in White Nile state, lead-
subsequently adopted by a number of replaced with Uber Ajong Mawut. The ing to a rupture of the pipeline.
agencies, including the United Nations new governor is from the same family as 44 Telephone interviews with SAF Military
Office for the Coordination of Humani James Ajongo, who replaced Malong as Intelligence, name withheld, September–
tarian Affairs (OCHA), which used it as head of the SPLA and hails from the most November 2024.
the base for the ‘South Sudan: Humani- prominent Luo family in the state. Hussein 45 Telephone interviews with RSF personnel,
tarian Needs and Response Plan 2024’ Abdel Bagi was removed as vice president November 2024.
and the Integrated Food Security Phase on 10 February 2025, following long- 46 According to the United Nations Mission
Classification (IPC) for South Sudan—the standing disagreements with other in South Sudan Human Rights Division
globally recognized standard for assess- members of the SSOA and—within Bagi’s (UNMISS-HRD), there was a 24% increase
ing food insecurity. Such utilizations of own South Sudan People’s Movement/ in violent incidents in 2023 compared to
population figures are politically explo- Army—with Costello Garang. 2022 (UNMISS-HRD, 2024).
sive because they shift the assessment 33 Nhial Deng Nhial is an extremely popular 47 Interviews with sources in Boro Medina,
of humanitarian needs and thus the politician from Tonj South, Warrap state. Raga county; Wau, Western Bahr el Ghazal;
distribution of humanitarian aid. See 34 Bol Malek was also soon removed as gov- and Magwi county, Eastern Equatoria,
HCT (2023); IPC (2023); UNFPA (2021). ernor. Francis Marial Abur was appointed June–December 2024.
For a study of the IPC, see Craze (2024c); the governor of Warrap after Akol Koor’s 48 Telephone interviews with informants
for a study of the UNFPA estimate, see S. appointment to the position was rescinded in Bentiu, Unity state, November–
and Marko (forthcoming). in October 2024. He, too, was removed December 2024.
21 Leer county is Machar’s place of birth, on 19 February 2025, and replaced by 49 Some of the NSS’s funding for diverse
and Gai had been backed by Machar the storied SSPDF commander, Magok economic activities went directly to Akol
despite his unpopularity among the Magok Deng, who hails from Tonj (see Koor, and was used to pay for some of
SPLA-IO’s military leadership in Unity ‘Kiir’s shadow’ section below). the organization’s wage bill. This led to a
state. See Small Arms Survey (2023c). 35 Tut Kew was removed as a presidential crisis in payments immediately after Akol
22 Interviews with SPLM-IO politicians in security adviser in December 2024— Koor’s removal. By February 2025, however,
Kuajok and Warrap town, 2021. a development discussed below. these flows had been reconstituted.
23 See UNHRC (2023); UNSC (2024a). 36 Buay is from the Kwech section of the Bul 50 For accounts of ethnically targeted killing
24 Troika diplomats privately indicated that Nuer. Within the Kwech, he is from the by Dinka forces, see Amnesty International
this would have been the only acceptable Nyang subsection, and within the Nyang, (2017); Craze (2019); HRW (2014).
justification for extending the transitional from the Gangaak subsection. Bapiny
process. Conversations in Juba, London, Monytuil, the SSOA commander, his
Nairobi, and Washington, DC, January– brother Nguen Monytuil, the former gov-
September 2024. ernor, and Matthew Puljang, the SPLA References
25 These concerns were not credible. Given officer with whom Buay fell out, are all Amnesty International. 2017. ‘South Sudan:
the Kenyan government’s high-level also from the Nyang section of the Kwech, Killings, Mass Displacement and System-
backing of the talks, it is very unlikely but from the Maloh (or Barpoh) subsection, atic Looting as Government Forces Purge
abductions or assassination would have making the dispute between them one Civilians from Upper Nile.’ 21 June.
been countenanced. Cirillo’s refusal to that the Bul Nuer often say is an internal —. 2023. ‘South Sudan: Authorities Must
attend is more likely predicated on an battle within Nyang. Interviews in Mayom Clarify Fate and Whereabouts of Detained
assessment that the Tumaini talks, at county, 2019. Critic.’ 25 February.
best, would lead to rebel groups being 37 Interviews with RSF personnel and South AUCISS (African Union Commission of Inquiry
absorbed into a government structure that Sudanese rebel factions, Nairobi, June– on South Sudan). 2014. Final Report of
he has denounced as unsalvageable. November 2024. the African Union Commission of Inquiry
26 Telephone and in-person interviews with 38 Telephone and in-person interviews with on South Sudan. October. Addis Ababa,
Buay, Nairobi, 2023–24. Dickson Gatluak and Johnson Olonyi, Juba Ethiopia: AUCISS.
27 Telephone and in-person interviews with and Nairobi, August 2023–November 2024. Boswell, Alan. 2019. Insecure Power and Vio-
UDRM politicians, Nairobi, June–July 2024. 39 Akol Koor, whose home base is in Greater lence: The Rise and Fall of Paul Malong
28 The preceding paragraph is based on Awuul, Tonj North, was replaced by Akec and the Mathiang Anyoor. HSBA Briefing
interviews with Buay, Oyai, Gatluak, and Tong Aleu, from Tonj South, while Maroldit Paper. Geneva: Small Arms Survey. October.
other participants in the Tumaini Peace was replaced by Abraham Gum Makuac— Cormack, Zoe. 2016. ‘Borders are Galaxies:
Initiative who asked not to be named, also from Gogrial. Both Gum Makuac and Interpreting Contestations over Local
Nairobi, June–November 2024. Tong Aleu, however, did not last long in Administrative Boundaries in South Sudan.’
29 Since the beginning of the Sudanese their posts. Gum Makuac was replaced Africa, Vol. 86, No. 3.
war, Ruto has welcomed the RSF into the in December 2024 by Lual Lual Malok, Craze, Joshua. 2013. Dividing Lines: Grazing
Kenyan capital, and has been involved while Tong Aleu was dismissed in February and Conflict along the Sudan–South Sudan
Border. HSBA Working Paper No. 30.
in business deals with the paramilitary 2025, due to his opposition to the assent
Geneva: Small Arms Survey. July.
forces. Interviews with members of the of Bol Mel.
—. 2014. Contested Borders: Continuing
RSF and Sudan Liberation Army-Abdul 40 Deng Wol, another of Akol Koor’s allies,
Tensions over the Sudan–South Sudan
Wahid, Nairobi and Kampala, September– had previously been dismissed in Decem-
Border. HSBA Working Paper No. 34.
December 2024 and February 2025. ber 2024.
Geneva: Small Arms Survey. November.
30 Telephone interviews with Simon Gatwich 41 Telephone interviews with informants in —. 2019. Displaced and Immiserated: The
Dual, June–September 2024; interviews Mankien, September–December 2024. Shilluk of Upper Nile in South Sudan’s
with SAF Military Intelligence, locations 42 Interviews with members of the UPA, Civil War, 2014–19. HSBA Report. Geneva:
withheld, February–June 2024. In Novem- Nairobi, January 2025. Small Arms Survey. September.
ber 2024, Gatwich moved from Rabak to 43 On 10 February, when a pumping station —. 2020. The Politics of Numbers: On Security
Port Sudan; in January 2025, he announced ran out of diesel close to Khartoum, Sector Reform in South Sudan, 2005-2020.
that his forces would be absorbed into the Sudan’s capital, the pipeline seized up. Report. London: London School of Eco-
SSPDF—a development discussed in the The Sudanese state-owned Bashayer nomics and Political Science.
next section of the paper. Pipeline Company (BAPCO) attempted to —. 2021. ‘Knowledge Will Not Save Us: Stuck
31 Interview with opposition politician, name remove the oil plug. A day later, the pipe- in the Mud in South Sudan.’ n+1, No. 39.
withheld, Nairobi, June 2024. line suffered a severe drop of pressure Winter.
On the Brink 17
About the
HSBA project
The Human Security Baseline Assessment (HSBA) for Sudan and South Sudan is
a multiyear project administered by the Small Arms Survey since 2006. It was
developed in cooperation with the Canadian government, the United Nations
Mission in Sudan, the United Nations Development Programme, and a wide
array of international and Sudanese partners. Through the active generation
and dissemination of timely, empirical research, the project supports violence
reduction initiatives, including disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration
programmes and incentive schemes for civilian arms collection, as well as security
sector reform and arms control interventions across Sudan and South Sudan. The
HSBA also offers policy-relevant advice on the political and economic drivers of
conflict and insecurity. Publications in Arabic, English, and French are available at:
www.smallarmssurvey.org.
The Small Arms Survey is a centre for applied knowledge dedicated to prevent-
ing and reducing illicit small arms proliferation and armed violence. The Survey
informs policy and practice through a combination of data, evidence-based
knowledge, authoritative resources and tools, and tailored expert advice and
training, and by bringing together practitioners and policymakers.
The Survey is an associated programme of the Geneva Graduate Institute, located
in Switzerland, and has an international staff with expertise in security studies,
political science, law, economics, development studies, sociology, criminology,
and database and programme management. It collaborates with a network of
researchers, practitioners, partner institutions, non-governmental organizations,
and governments in more than 50 countries.
The Survey’s activities and outputs are made possible through core support as
well as project funding. A full list of current donors and projects can be accessed
via the Small Arms Survey website. For more information, please visit:
www.smallarmssurvey.org.
Contact details
Small Arms Survey
Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E
1202 Geneva, Switzerland
t +41 22 908 5777
e [email protected]
Follow the
Small Arms Survey
@SmallArmsSurvey HSBA