STATE OF HARYANA VS RAJBIR S/o RISHIPAL &

others

CIS No: Chi/7/2021

FACTS:
Brief facts of the case are while on the way to agricultural field Rajbir and Partap stopped Sumit
(complainant) who was also on his way to his agricultural field claiming he has hit their ox with
his tractor and started fighting him Sumit grabbed the phone from one of the villagers and called
his brother Amit who came from home and rescued him Meanwhile Pratap has thrown a brick to
Amit leading to injury to back of his head leading to fracture thereafter Sumit reached the
Nearest Bapoli police station and registered an Fir against Rajbir S/o RISHIPAL and Pratap S/o
RISHIPAL under the IPC SECTION 323,341,506,34 for hurt.

LAST HEARING:
Present: Sh. Ankur Kumar, APP for State.
Accused Rajbir and Partap on bail represented by Sh. Anil Sharma,
Advocate.

As per the report of Ahlmad, main case file has been sent to the
Court of Sh. R.K. Mehta, learned ASJ, Panipat.
Now, to come up on 22.04.2025 for awaiting main case file.
 Saina etc. v. Javed etc.

CNR No: HRPP01-000212-2024

FACTS:
Claimants/DHS Saina widow, Sameer minor son, Summayya minor daughter and Rihan minor
son of deceased Islam filed present application for seeking direction to JD no.3-New India
Assurance Company Ltd. for re-issuance of cheques described in the application on the ground
that applicants could not deposit the cheques in question through their banker due to lack of
knowledge.
A perusal of the record revealed that MACT, Panipat vide an award dated 14.3.2023 passed in
claim petition no.296-2022 titled Saina & Ors. Vs. Javed & Ors. Awarded compensation and
ordered that compensation of Saina would be given to her whereas compensation of minor
Sameer, Summayya and Rihan shall be deposit in some fixed deposit scheme in some
nationalized bank.
Accordingly, cheques in question were drawn by New India Insurance Co. of HDFC Bank,
Harmony Tower, G.T. Road, Panipat (photocopies attached with the application)

LAST HEARING:
Fresh intimation regarding issuance of fresh cheques again not received from JD no. 3 Insurance
Company. Adjournment sought.
To come up on 1.4.2025 for making compliance by JD no. 3 New India Assurance Company Ltd.
G.T. Road, Panipat.
A copy of this order be sent to Manager of New India Assurance Company Ltd., G.T. Road,
Panipat for information.
 Kogta Financial Limited v. Navish and Ors

CNR No: HRPP01-010547-2023

FACTS:
Execution petition received by assignment. It be checked and registered.
Let, notice to judgment debtors be issued for 05.02.2024 on filing of PF, copy of petition etc.
Long date is given due to heavy pendency of the cases as well as priority given to the cases of
Action Plan of 2023-2024.

LAST HEARING:
Notice to judgment debtor No. 1 &. 2 could not be issued as their correct address and copy of
petition not filed. At this stage, learned counsel for the decree-holder has made a statement to
the effect that due to the technical reason, he does not want to pursue the present execution
petition further and withdraws the same.
The present execution petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the decree-
holder reserves his right to file a fresh, if need be. The original documents, if any may kindly be
returned.
In view of the statement of counsel for the decree-holder recorded on even date, the present
execution petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
 Neeraj v. Vinod and another

CNR No: HRPP01-008105-2023

FACTS:

Claim petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Notice of the
petition be issued to respondents for 20.11.2023 on filing of copy, PF etc. Long date is given due
to heavy pendency of the sessions trial as well as priority given to the action plan cases of 2023-
24.
A perusal of the case file reveals that the investigating officer has not intimated with regard to the
accident in question to the claim Tribunal within 48 hours of the accident and also failed to
produce detail accidental report (DAR) before the claim Tribunal within 60 days of the accident.
In view of the observations given by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as M.R.
Krishna Murthi Versus The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Others arising out of SLP (C) Nos.
31521-31522 of 2017, wherein the reliance has further been placed on the case law titled as
Rajesh Tyagi & Ors Versus Jasbir Singh & Ors, FAO 842/2003. Hence, a notice in this regard be
issued to the investigating officer to appear in person in the court and directed to submit DAR as
mentioned above.
In compliance of the observations given in the aforesaid M.R. Krishna Murthi’s (supra) case, the
claimants are also directed to open their saving bank account(s) in a nationalized bank near the
place of their permanent residence and the said bank is hereby directed not to issue any cheque
book(s) and/or debit card(s) to the claimant(s) and if the same have already been issued, the said
bank is directed to cancel the same and make an endorsement on the passbook of the claimant(s)
to the effect that no cheque book and/or debit card shall be issued to the claimant(s) without the
permission of the court.
The claimant(s) are directed to produce the copy of this order to the concerned bank upon which
the bank is directed to make an endorsement on the passbook. The claimant(s) are further
directed to produce their passbook(s) with necessary endorsement as well as Aadhar card and
PAN card before the Tribunal till next date of hearing.

LAST HEARING:

No evidence of claimant is present.

CIS NO: Coma/319/2022

FACTS:
An application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
presented today. It be checked and registered. Notice of the application be issued to respondent
for 17.10.2022 through Protection Officer. Protection Officer is also directed to inquire into the
allegations contained in the application and submit his/her report regarding any incident of
domestic violence as alleged therein. A copy of this order along with copy of application be sent
to the Protection Officer immediately and his/her report be waited for the date fixed.

LAST HEARING:
Today the case was fixed for furnishing detailed affidavits regarding their income, expenditure,
assets and liabilities by respondent.
Affidavit of assets and liabilities filed by the respondent.
Now to come upon for 17.03.2025 for evidence of applicant.
 State v. Faizan etc.

CIS No: 279/2019

FACTS:
File put up before me in pursuance of order passed by the Ld. District & Sessions Judge, Panipat
conveyed vide endorsement No. 916079 dated 27.07.2015.
Arguments on charge not addressed. Ld. Counsel for the accused request for adjournment for
addressing arguments on the ground that due to some unavoidable circumstances, he cannot
address the arguments. Heard. His request not opposed. Now, the case is adjourned to 21.08.2019
for arguments on charge.
Arguments heard. A prima facie case for the commission of offences punishable under Sections
380 and 457 read with section 120B of Indian Penal Code Act is made out against the accused.
Charge is framed accordingly to which the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Now,
case to come up on 05.05.2020 for evidence of the prosecution. All unexamined PW’s be
summoned to be brought at his own responsibilities.

LAST HEARING:
Accused Javed and Suleman on bail are present before the Court and their presence have been
marked.
An application for exemption from the personal appearance of the accused Afsar moved through
his counsel. In view of the contents of the application, the same is hereby allowed for today only.
Accused Faizan not produced.
 Let, production warrants of accused Faizan directed to Superintendent, Jail Panipat be
issued for 22.07.2025 with direction to produce the accused before the Court if he remains in
custody till then.
Now, to come up on 22.07.2025 for prosecution evidence. Prosecution witnesses be
summoned accordingly.

Saroj v. Avinash Kumar

CNR No: HRPP01-012014-2022

FACTS:
Petition under Section 13(1) of HMA presented today. Office report perused. It be checked and
registered. On request, party is allowed to be represented by a legal practitioner. Now notice be
issued to respondent for Written statement filed. Copy given. From the pleadings of the parties
following issues are hereby framed: -

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled for a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and

desertion?

2. Whether the petition is not maintainable?

3. Whether the petitioner has no cause of action to file the present petition?

4. Relief.
 No other issue is made out and no other issue is pressed or claimed by the parties. Adjourned to

10.10.2023 for evidence of petitioner. PF/DM list of witnesses be filed within 15

days13.12.2022.

As per received report of Mediation Centre, the matter could not be settled between the parties.

Come up on 05.02.2024 for evidence of petitioner to be brought at own responsibility.

LAST HEARING:

No PW present. Date requested. Come up on 19.03.2025 for evidence of petitioner to be brought

at own responsibility.
CASE
DIARY