Effects of Cage Topology On Ethylene Adsorption Mechanism in Silver (2024)
Effects of Cage Topology On Ethylene Adsorption Mechanism in Silver (2024)
Keywords: Zeolite-based adsorbents have been successfully used for many challenging separations due to their tunable
Ethylene properties. A particularly notable application involves the separation of light olefins from paraffins, wherein the
Zeolites molecular sieving properties of zeolites play a pivotal role. Additionally, the selective interaction of alkenes
Silver
with transition metal cations, positioned within the channels and cavities of microporous zeolites, further
CHA
enhances separation capabilities.
RHO
Inelastic Neutron Scattering
This study aims to comprehensively characterize the interactions between ethylene and Ag+ exchanged
DFT zeolites, employing a multidisciplinary approach, combining Inelastic Neutron Scattering (INS), Infrared (IR)
spectroscopy, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), UV–Vis and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.
CHA and RHO, zeolites largely applied in gas separation processes, were chosen due to their similar small
pore sizes and pore volume, but different cavity shapes and flexibilities.
The interpretation of derived DFT Electron Density Difference, experimentally supported by 13 C Solid
State NMR results, provide an understanding of each framework’s role during the charge transfer mechanisms
between ethylene and transition metal species. Specific deformations in the flexible framework of zeolite RHO
explain a blueshift of the band at 400 cm−1 in the librational region of INS spectra compared to CHA. This
structural change in RHO, represented by the conic shape of the cage 8-ring side pockets, increases steric
effects over the adsorbate while rendering the metallic adsorption center less exposed within the zeolite’s
cavity, finally leading to a weaker adsorption energy. The redshift of C=C stretching frequencies observed
by IR spectroscopy and DFT calculations, as well as C=C and C-H bond lengthening of ethylene confirm the
formation of 𝜋-complexes on silver in both zeolites and allowed a further evaluation of the effects of the
different frameworks cages on the aforementioned interaction.
1. Introduction for its separation and purification. Among the different alternatives,
adsorption processes based on porous solids seem to be one of the most
Ethylene (C2 H4 ) stands as a crucial commodity for the chemical promising, since these technologies are well established for very large
and petrochemical industry with a production that exceeds 200 million production volumes with a relative low energetic penalty [6,7].
tons per year. This olefin is mainly obtained by steam cracking of Zeolites have appeared as one of the first options for the separation
naphtha or ethane (C2 H6 ), providing a cracked gas in which ethane and of ethylene from ethane due to their molecular sieving properties
impurities also co-exist at significant ratios. Thus, ethylene separation that allow to control the diffusion of different components through a
and purification is required for its application in chemical processes [1–
separation column (or membrane) [8,9]. Pure silica small-pore ITQ-
4]. Currently the separation of ethylene is carried out by the traditional
55 zeolite is a successfully adsorbent for ethylene/ethane separation
cryogenic distillation, a highly energy-demanding process (responsible
due to the very different diffusional rates of such molecules inside
for more than 0.3% of annual global energy consumption) [5]. There-
fore, there is an evident need of developing alternative approaches its pore system [10]. Moreover, simulations studies have shown that
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Jiménez-Ruiz).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2024.112982
Received 2 December 2023; Received in revised form 22 December 2023; Accepted 2 January 2024
Available online 4 January 2024
1387-1811/© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
ITQ-55 zeolite that ethylene is up to almost ≈ 1 Å larger than the evidences of structural modification were found in Ag-CHA zeolite. This
nominal pore aperture, being its diffusion possible thanks to framework results lead to a less favorable energy for the formation of Ag-C2 H4
flexibility [10,11]. Ethylene molecule, slightly smaller than ethane, complexes in CsAg-RHO than in Ag-CHA, proving that the shape of
holds the pore opening during molecular diffusion being selectively the cages, i.e. the shape of the 8-ring side pockets, where the cation
adsorbed in the zeolite. However, although remarkable, the successful is located and the framework flexibility play an important role on the
case of pure silica ITQ-55 for the molecular sieving separation of ethylene-Ag interaction.
ethane and ethylene is very particular and suffers from slow adsorption
kinetics for its industrial application. 2. Materials and methods
An alternative approach for the efficient separation of ethylene
makes use of the capability of the unsaturated bonds of alkenes to 2.1. Sample preparation
donate electrons, working as Lewis bases. These electrons can interact
with compensating transition metal cations located within the zeolite Ag-CHA and CsAg-RHO zeolites were obtained by silver exchange of
pores that act as Lewis acids. Ethylene is either weakly chemisorbed Na-CHA and NaCs-RHO, which were synthesized following the proce-
or strongly physisorbed on the cationic sites while ethane is not re- dure previously reported [26,27] and described in Supporting Material.
tained. Several transition metal cations such as Co(II), Ni(II), Zn(II), The silver exchange was carried out mixing 2.3 g of zeolite a 0.3 M
Fe(III), Cu(II), Ag(I) [12–14] to mention some examples have been AgNO3 solution (0.64 g AgNO3 dissolve in 11.45 mL of distilled water)
proposed as good candidates to provide an appropriate selective bind- under stirring for 24 h at 25 ◦ C. Then, the zeolites were filtered, washed
ing with ethylene, being Ag-zeolites among the most efficient. In fact, with distilled water and dried at 100 ◦ C. The XRD patterns of Ag-
silver-exchanged zeolite A (framework code LTA) has been reported to CHA and CsAg-RHO are typical of the CHA and RHO-type structures
achieve the absolute separation of ethylene from ethane [15] being its (Fig. S1). The chemical composition of Ag-exchanged zeolites was
exceptional behavior attributed to the preferential olefin adsorption on determined by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-
silver besides the steric size exclusion of ethane. Meanwhile, the excel- ray spectroscopy (EDX-SEM) on a JEOL JSM-6300 scanning electron
lent C2 H4 /C2 H6 separation properties of silver ZK-5 (KFI) zeolite has microscope using a back-scattered electrons (BSE) detector and a beam
been explained by the stabilization of cationic Ag+ due to the proper power of 10 KV. The Ag-CHA has Si/Al = 4.9, Na/Al = 0.1 and Ag/Al
combination of framework topology and chemical composition [16]. = 0.54 molar ratios; and the CsAg-RHO was Si/Al = 4.6, Na/Al = 0.1,
In spite of the excellent results reported up to now, there is not a Cs/Al = 0.29 and Ag/Al = 0.57.
material appropriate for industrial applications. The development of The zeolites were degassed at 400 ◦ C overnight under high vacuum
a suitable adsorbent for ethylene is still an industrial challenge that conditions (∼10−5 mbar). Then, 1 and 4 molecules of ethylene per unit
requires further investigations. cell were adsorbed on CsAg-RHO (T48 O96 ) and Ag-CHA (T36 O72 ), re-
The adsorption of ethylene on Ag+ sites (and other transition metal
spectively, to carry out the INS and NMR experiments. A lower amount
cations) occurs through the 𝜋-complexation mechanism that involves
was adsorbed in the case of CsAg-RHO, because of the adsorption
the 𝜎 bonding by the electron charge transfer from the p orbitals of
problems presented by the zeolite due to a change in its structure
ethylene to the empty 5s orbital of the Ag cation. Simultaneously, there
symmetry (to be better explained in section 3.2).
is backdonation of charges from the filled 4d10 orbital of Ag+ to the an-
tibonding 𝜋* orbital of the adsorbate. The electron charge backdonation
2.2. Solid state NMR
from silver to ethylene, d(Ag+ ) ⟶ 𝜋* (C2 H4 ) dominates the adsorption
mechanism, producing a lengthening of the C=C bonds, a redshift of 13 C NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz on a Bruker Oxford-
the stretching vibrations and a high field shift of the 13 C NMR signal
Avance spectrometer, using a 7 mm probe and spinning the sample at
of ethylene adsorbed on Ag-zeolites or Ag-supported catalyst [17–20].
5 kHz. 13 C NMR spectra were carried out at 25 ◦ C by cross polarization
Theoretical calculations on the adsorption of ethylene on Ag+ -zeolites
sequence under angle spinning conditions (1 H-13 C CP-MAS), using 4 μ
points out to a redistribution of charges upon adsorption with a net
s 𝜋/2 pulses for 1 H with a contact time of 2 ms and a recycle delay
transfer from the 𝜋 (ethylene) to the 5s (Ag+ ) orbitals [21,22].
of 3 s. 13 C labeled ethylene (Ethylene-13 C2 99% atom 13 C, Merck)
The aim of this work is to investigate the influence of the local
was adsorbed in a vacuum line on the samples previously degassed at
geometry and the neighboring chemical composition of the Ag+ sites
400 ◦ C overnight, and adamantane (𝛿 13 C = 38.3 ppm) was used as
on the adsorption of ethylene over Ag-zeolites. For this purpose, we
have chosen two small pore silver exchanged aluminosilicate zeolites reference.
with different topologies, chabazite (CHA type) and Rho (RHO type),
which possess similar micropore volumes and pore apertures delimited 2.3. UV–visible spectroscopy
by 8 TO4 tetrahedra but differ in shapes of the cavities and the windows
that give access to them. Another relevant difference between the two A UV–Vis Cary 7000 spectrometer equipped with a diffuse re-
zeolites is the higher structural flexibility of zeolite RHO upon adsorp- flectance accessory (Praying Mantis Harrick) was employed for UV–
tion [23–25]. Therefore, comparison on the details of the adsorption of Vis experiments. The spectra were measured using BaSO4 as internal
ethylene on Ag-CHA and Ag-RHO zeolites will provide information of standard.
the influence of the geometry, the local chemical composition of the Ag
adsorption site and on the role played by the framework flexibility. The 2.4. Infrared
information on how different factors affect the adsorption of ethylene
on silver-zeolites may contribute to refine the state-of-the-art strategies Infrared spectra were recorded with a Vertex 70 Bruker FTIR spec-
to improve the selectivity in the separation of ethylene, by tuning the trometer using a deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector and
properties of metal exchange zeolites. acquiring at 4 cm1 resolution. An IR cell allowing in situ treatments
More specifically, we have investigated the ethylene adsorption on in controlled atmospheres and temperatures from 176 to 500 ◦ C was
Ag-CHA and CsAg-RHO zeolites by applying a variety of spectroscopic connected to a vacuum system with gas dosing facility. For the in situ
techniques such as Infrared (IR), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) studies, Ag-CHA zeolite was activated at 350 ◦ C for 4 h under dynamic
and Inelastic Neutron Scattering (INS) in combination with Density vacuum conditions. The temperature was lowered keeping the pressure
Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. The results reported here indi- at 10−4 mbar. Then, doses of ethylene were admitted to the sample cell
cate that there is a strong deformation at the 8-ring pocket zone, where until saturation point at 3.57 mbar. IR spectra were recorded after each
the Ag+ cation is placed, in CsAg-RHO zeolite. On the contrary, no dosage. After saturation, gaseous ethylene and physisorbed ethylene
2
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
were removed from the cell by means of evacuation until 100 ◦ C and
measured again.
The same procedure was used to measure the CsAg-RHO, how-
ever, ethylene adsorption did not take place. As mentioned in the
experimental part, after the sample degassing, this zeolite undergoes
a conformational change, modifying the symmetry of the catalyst. This
feature results in a decrease of gas diffusion through the channels due
to smaller pore size.
3
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
Fig. 3. INS spectra for gas phase C2 H4 (gray), C2 H4 Ag-CHA (blue) and C2 H4
CsAg-RHO (red) as measured in IN1-Lagrange.
4
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
5
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
Fig. 5. Structural details of cha cage in the energy minimized C2 H4 Ag- CHA model. The distances between Ag and the closest framework oxygen atoms, dAg−Oz , as well as Ag-C,
dC−Ag are also shown. C2 H4 molecule is represented before and after the system energy minimization with its corresponding C-H distances, dC−H . Al, Ag, C and H atoms are
highlighted and identified in the figure. O atoms are highlighted in the 6-ring where Ag cation sits, O𝑧 are the 6-ring Oxygen atoms closest to Ag. Si and O atoms of cha cage are
represented by brownish lines to facilitate Ag-C2 H4 complex visualization.
6
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
Fig. 8. Structural details of lta cage in A. before and in B. after geometry optimized C2 H4 CsAg-RHO model. The distortion of d8r and lta cages are shown, indicating the structural
phase change from Im3m ̄ (highly symmetric) to I43 ̄ m (asymmetric). CsAg-RHO model, the conical narrowing of lta cage occurs in the region where Ag-C2 H4 complex lies. The
distances between Ag and the closest framework oxygen atoms, dAg−Oz , as well as Ag-C, dC−Ag are also displayed. C2 H4 molecule is represented before and after the system energy
minimization with its corresponding C-H distances, dC−H . Al, Ag, C and H atoms are highlighted and identified in the figure. O atoms are highlighted in 6-rings where Ag cation
sits. The other O atoms of the framework as well as Si atoms are represented by brownish (and dark blue lines in d8r details) to facilitate Ag-C2 H4 complex visualization. The
upper elliptical 8-rings in CsAg-RHO are highlighted in light blue (8-ring side pockets).
Fig. 9. Details of 8-ring side pockets in CsAg-RHO model, with distance between the
center of 8-rings given in Å.
7
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
Table 1
Vibrational analyses of experimental and calculated frequencies of ethylene interacting
with silver species in Ag-CHA and CsAg-RHO.
220 220
260 260 Hindered rotations
395 396
818 832 CH2 in plane
rocking (𝜈10 )
Ag-CHA 980 977 CH2 wagging (𝜈8 )
asymmetric
1044 1024, 1037 CH2 wagging (𝜈7 )
asymmetric and CH2
torsion (𝜈4 )
asymmetric
1205 1216 CH2 in plane
rocking (𝜈6 )
1309 1326 CH2 scissoring (𝜈3 )
230 221
270 275 Hindered rotations
411 419
814 825 CH2 in plane
rocking (𝜈10 )
CsAg-RHO 971 970 CH2 wagging (𝜈8 )
asymmetric
1020, 1052 CH2 wagging (𝜈7 )
1027 asymmetric and CH2
torsion (𝜈4 )
asymmetric
1205 1216 CH2 in plane
rocking (𝜈6 )
1294 1323 CH2 scissoring (𝜈3 )
8
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
9
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
Table 2
Summarizing table addressing structural details such as cage diameter (D𝑐𝑎𝑔𝑒 ), distances between Ag-O𝑧 , Ag-C and C–H, charge transfer (𝛥e− ), C=C stretching redshift, C=C bond
lengthening (𝛥 𝐶=𝐶 ) and adsorption energies for C2 H4 Ag-CHA and CsAg-RHO.
Model D𝑐𝑎𝑔𝑒 (Å) d𝐴𝑔−𝑂𝑧 (Å) d𝐶1,2−𝐴𝑔 (Å) d𝐶−𝐻 (Å) 𝛥e− C=C stretc. 𝛥C=C (Å) Ads. Energy
(kJ/mol)
C2 H4 Ag-CHA 10.7 2.46, 2.64, 3.02 2.43, 2.45 1.095-1.096 0.17 48 (exp), 46 (calc) 0.03 −112.89
(1.094 before ads)
C2 H4 CsAg-RHO 10 2.49, 2.51, 2.84 2.44, 2.45 1.094-1.096 0.20 56 (calc) 0.03 −97.20
(1.091 before ads)
[1] D. Saha, M.-B. Kim, A.J. Robinson, R. Babarao, P.K. Thallapally, Elucidating
G. Almeida: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. A. de Marcos- the mechanisms of paraffin-olefin separations using nanoporous adsorbents: An
Galán: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. J. Martínez-Ortigosa: overview, iScience 24 (9) (2021) 103042, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.
Data curation. G. Sastre: Investigation. M. Jiménez-Ruiz: Writing 103042.
– review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition, [2] Y. Wu, B.M. Weckhuysen, Separation and purification of hydrocarbons with
porous materials, Angew. Chem. 63 (35) (2021) 18930–18949, http://dx.doi.
Conceptualization. F. Rey: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, org/10.1002/anie.202104318.
Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. T. [3] T. Ren, M. Patel, K. Blok, Steam cracking and methane to olefins: Energy
Blasco: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, use, CO2 emissions and production costs, Energy 33 (5) (2008) 817–833, http:
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.002.
Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
[4] J. Hou, P. Liu, M. Jiang, L. Yu, L. Li, Z. Tang, Olefin/paraffin separation through
membranes: From mechanisms to critical materials, J. Mater. Chem. A (7) (2019)
23489–23511, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ta06329c.
Declaration of competing interest [5] N. Lu, Q. Gao, Y.M. Zhang, Y. Gao, L.Y. Wu, Y.A. Zhao, L.Z. Chen,
Ethane/ethylene separation in a metal-organic framework with shape-matching
ethane traps, J. Solid State Chem. 304 (2021) 122594, http://dx.doi.org/10.
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal rela- 1016/j.jssc.2021.122594.
tionships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [6] Y. Wang, S.B. Peh, D. Zhao, Alternatives to cryogenic distillation: Advanced
Teresa Blasco reports financial support was provided by Spanish Sci- porous materials in adsorptive light olefin/paraffin separations, Small 15 (25)
entific Research Council. Gabrielli Almeida reports financial support (2019) 1900058, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.201900058.
[7] M. Sun, Q. Gu, A. Hanif, T. Wang, J. Shang, Transition metal cation-exchanged
was provided by European Research Executive Agency. Alessandra de
SSZ-13 zeolites for CO2 capture and separation from N2, Chem. Eng. J. 370
Marcos Galan reports financial support was provided by Severo Ochoa (2019) 1450–1458, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.234.
Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have [8] E.M. Flanigen, Molecular sieve zeolite technology - The first twenty-five years,
no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that Pure Appl. Chem. 52 (9) (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac198052092191.
[9] E. Pérez-Botella, S. Valencia, F. Rey, Zeolites in adsorption processes: State
could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
of art and future prospects, Chem. Rev. 122 (24) (2022) 17647–17695, http:
//dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140.
[10] P.J. Bereciatuga, Á. Cantín, A. Corma, J.L. Jordá, M. Palomino, F. Rey, S.
Data availability Valencia, E.W.C. Jr., P. Kortunov, P.I. Ravikovitch, A. Burton, C.Y.Y. Wang, C.
Paur, Javier, A.R. Bishop, G.L. Casty, Control of zeolite framework flexibility and
pore topology for separation of ethane and ethylene, Science 358 (6366) (2017)
Data will be made available on request. 1068–1071, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0092.
[11] R. Bai, X. Song, W. Yan, J. Yu, Low energy adsorptive separation by zeolites,
Natl. Sci. Rev. 9 (9) (2022) 2–15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac064.
Acknowledgments [12] Q.H. Trinh, S.B. Lee, Y.S. Mok, Removal of ethylene from air stream by
adsorption and plasma-catalytic oxidation using silver-based bimetallic catalysts
supported on zeolite, J. Hazard. Mater. 285 (2015) 525–534, http://dx.doi.org/
Financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.019.
by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ‘‘ERDF A way of mak- [13] N.J. Abreu, H. Valdesa, C.A. Zaror, F. Azzolina-Jury, M.F. Melendrez, Ethy-
lene adsorption onto natural and transition metal modified Chilean zeolite:
ing Europe’’ (Projects: CEX2021–001230-S, PID2022-136934OB-I00) is
An operando DRIFTS approach, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 274 (2019)
deeply acknowledged. The authors also thank the Spanish Ministry 138–148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.07.043.
of Science and Innovation by MCIN /AEI /10.13039/501100011033 [14] H. Xiang, A. Ameen, P. Gorgojo, F.R. Siperstein, S.M. Holmes, X. Fan, Selective
and ‘‘European Union Next Generation EU/PRTR’’ (Projects: TED2021– adsorption of ethane over ethylene on m(bdc)(ted)0.5 (M=Co, Cu, Ni, Zn)
metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 292 (2020)
130191B-C41), Generalitat Valenciana, Spain (Project: Prometeo 2021/
109724, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109724.
077) and ‘‘Advanced Materials Programme’’ of Generalitat Valenciana [15] S. Aguado, G. Bergeret, C. Daniel, D. Farrusseng, Absolute molecular sieve
‘‘European Union Next Generation EU/PRTR’’ (project: MFA/2022/047). separation of ethylene/ethane mixtures with silver zeolite A, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
All authors thank ILL for neutron beam-time allocation (experiments 134 (36) (2012) 14635–14637, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja305663k.
7-05-488 and 7 05-522) and ILL C-Lab for computational support. [16] J. Min, K. Kemp, S. Hong, Silver ZK-5 zeolites for selective ethylene/ ethane
separation, Separ. Purif. Technol. 250 (2020) 117146, http://dx.doi.org/10.
G.A. thanks funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research 1016/j.seppur.2020.117146.
and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [17] I.L. Mudrakovskii, V.M. Mastikhin, N.E. Bogdanchikova, A.V. Khasin, Nature
agreement No 847439. A.M.G. thanks funding of the grant No SEV of ethylene complexes on the surface of Ag/SiO2 as evidenced by 13C NMR
data, React. Kinetics Catal. Lett. 34 (1987) 185–190, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
2016-0683-19-2 from Severo Ochoa programme.
BF02069222.
[18] J.K. Plischke, A.J. Benesi, M.A. Vannice, A 13C NMR study of ethylene adsorbed
on reduced and oxygen-covered Ag surfaces, J. Catalysis 138 (1) (1992) 223–239,
Appendix A. Supplementary data http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(92)90019-E.
[19] Y.H. Chin, P.D. Ellis, Chemisorption of ethylene onto supported platinum gamma
alumina and silver gamma alumina as followed by solid-state static and CP/MAS
Supplementary material related to this article can be found online carbon-13 and static proton NMR spectroscopy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1) (1993)
at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2024.112982. 204–211, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00054a029.
10
G. Almeida et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 367 (2024) 112982
[20] A.A. Gabrienko, S.S. Arzumanov, I.B. Moroz, A.V. Toktarev, W. Wang, A.G. [39] J. Howard, Z.A. Kadir, K. Robson, Infrared spectroscopic studies of ethylene
Stepanov, Methane activation and transformation on Ag/H-ZSM-5 zeolite studied adsorbed on silver A zeolite, Zeolites 3 (1982) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0144-
with solid-state NMR, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (15) (2013) 7690–7702, http: 2449(83)90198-7.
//dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp4006795. [40] J. Howard, T.C. Wassingt, C.J. Wright, Ethylene adsorbed by silver exchanged
[21] E.L. Uzunova, H. Mikosch, Adsorption and activation of ethene in transition 13X zeolite; an inelastic neutron scattering study, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
metal exchanged zeolite clinoptilolite: A density functional study, ACS Catalysis (1975) 775–776, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C39750000775.
3 (2013) 2759–2767, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs4005997. [41] Y. Chai, X. Han, W. Li, S. Liu, S. Yao, C. Wang, W. Shi, I. da Silva, P. Manuel,
[22] E. Kassab, K. Seiti, M. Allavena, Determination of structure and acidity scales in Y. Cheng, L.D. Daemen, A. J., Ramirez-Cuesta, C.C. Tang, L. Jiang, S. Yang,
zeolite systems by ab initio and pseudopotential calculations, J. Phys. Chem. 92 N. Guan, L. Li, Control of zeolite pore interior for chemoselective alkyne/olefin
(23) (1988) 6705–6709, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100334a043. separations, Science 368 (2020) 1002–1006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.
[23] J.B. Parise, X. Liu, D.R. Corbin, G.A. Jones, Flexibility of the zeolite Rho aay8447.
framework: The redistribution of extra framework cations as a function of [42] L. Dent, J.V. Smith, Crystal structure of chabazite, a molecular sieve, Nature 181
temperature, MRS Online Proc. Library 233 (1991) 267–272, http://dx.doi.org/ (1958) 1794–1796.
10.1557/PROC-233-267. [43] M. Calligaris, A. Mezzetti, G. Nardin, L. Randaccio, Cation sites and framework
[24] M.M. Lozinska, J.P.S. Mowat, P.A. Wright, S.P. Thompson, J.L. Jorda, M. deformations in dehydrated chabazites. crystal structure of a fully silver-
Palomino, S. Valencia, F. Rey, Cation gating and relocation during the highly exchanged chabazite, Zeolites 4 (1984) 323–328, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
selective trapdoor adsorption of CO2 on univalent cation forms of zeolite Rho, 0144-2449(84)90007-1.
Chem. Mater. 26 (2014) 2052–2061, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm404028f. [44] L. Smith, A. Davidson, A. Cheetham, A neutron diffraction and infrared
[25] M. Palomino, A. Corma, J.L. Jordá, F. Rey, S. Valencia, Zeolite Rho: A highly spectroscopy study of the acid form of the aluminosilicate zeolite, chabazite
selective adsorbent for CO2/CH4 separation induces by a structural phase (H- SSZ-13), Catalysis Lett. 49 (1997) 143–146, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:
modification, Chem. Commun. 48 (2) (2011) 231–238, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1019097019846.
1039/c1cc16320e. [45] C. Horvatits, D. Li, M. Dupuis, E.A. Kyriakidou, E.A. Walker, Ethylene and water
[26] D.E. Akporiaye, I.M. Dahl, H.B. Mostad, R. Wendelbo, Aluminum distribution in Co-adsorption on Ag/SSZ-13 zeolites: A theoretical study, J. Phys. Chem. C 124
chabazite: An experimental and computational study, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (10) (2020) 7295–7306.
(1996) 4148–4153, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp952189k. [46] M. Fischer, R. Bell, Cation-exchanged SAPO-34 for adsorption-based hydrocarbon
[27] T. Chatelain, J. Patarin, E. Fousson, M. Soulard, J. Guth, P. Schulz, Synthesis separations: predictions from dispersion-corrected DFT calculations, Phys. Chem.
and characterization of high-silica zeolite RHO prepared in the presence of 18- Chem. Phys. 16 (2014) 21062–21072, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CP01049C.
crown-6 ether as organic template, Microporous Mater. 4 (2) (1995) 231–238, [47] Y.M. Lee, S.J. Choi, Y. Kim, Crystal structure of an ethylene sorption complex of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-6513(95)00009-X. fully vacuum-dehydrated fully Ag+-exchanged zeolite X (FAU). Silver atoms have
[28] A. Ivanov, M. Jiménez-Ruiz, J. Kulda, IN1-LAGRANGE – The new ILL instrument reduced ethylene to give CH2 2- carbanions at framework oxide vacancies, J.
to explore vibration dynamics of complex materials, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 554 Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 20137–20144, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp058185p.
(2014) 012001–012007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/554/1/012001. [48] Z. Liu, X. Yi, G. Wang, X. Tang, G. Li, L. Huang, A. Zheng, Roles of 8-
[29] G. Almeida, A. de Marcos-Galan, T. Blasco, A.V. Moya, F. Rey, M. Palomino, M. ring and 12-ring channels in mordenite for carbonylation reaction: From the
Jiménez-Ruiz, INS study of ethylene on Ag+ exchanged zeolites, 2021. . ILL perspective of molecular adsorption and diffusion, AIChE J. (66) (2020) 16269,
Data Portal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.024.
[30] P. Mitchell, S.F. Parker, A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta, J. Tomkinson, Vibrational spec- [49] Z. Liu, J. Zhou, X. Tang, F. Liu, J. Yuan, G. Li, L. Huang, R. Krishna, K. Huang,
troscopy with Neutrons with Applications in Chemistry, Biology, Materials A. Zheng, Dependence of zeolite topology on alkane diffusion inside diverse
Science and Catalysis, third ed., World Scientific, United Kingdom, 2005. channels, AIChE J. (66) (2020) 16269, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.16269.
[31] Ch. Baerlocher and l.b. McCusker, 2022, Database of Zeolite Structures: http: [50] L. Abrams, D.R. Corbin, Sorption properties of zeolite Rho, J. Catalysis 127 (1)
//www.iza-structure.org/databases/. (Accessed: 06 June 2022). (1991) 9–21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(91)90204-H.
[32] BIOVIA materials studio, 2023, http://accelrys.com/products/materials-studio. [51] L. Xu, A. Okrut, G.L. Tate, R. Ohnishi, K.-L. Wu, D. Xie, A. Kulkarni, T.
[33] J. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made Takewaki, J.R. Monnier, A. Katz, Cs-RHO goes from worst to best as water
simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ enhances equilibrium CO2 adsorption via phase change, Langmuir 37 (2021)
PhysRevLett.77.3865. 13903–13908, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02430.
[34] K. Dymkowski, S.F. Parker, F. Fernandez-Alonso, S. Mukhopadhyay, AbINS: [52] J. Grand, N. Barrier, M. Debost, E.B. Clatworthy, F. Laine, P. Boullay, N.
The modern software for INS interpretation, Physica B (443–448) (2018) http: Nesterenko, J.-P. Dath, J.-P. Gilson, S. Mintova, Flexible template-free RHO nano-
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2018.02.034. sized zeolite for selective CO2 adsorption, Chem. Mater. 32 (2020) 5985–5993,
[35] O. Arnold, Mantid—Data analysis and visualization package for neutron scatter- http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01016.
ing and microSR experiments, nuclear instruments and methods, Phys. Res. A [53] J. Sadlo, M. Danilczukb, J. Michalik, Interaction of tetrameric silver with
764 (2014) 156–166, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.07.029. ammonia in AgCs-Rho zeolite, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3 (2001) 1717–1720,
[36] T. Yumura, A. Oda, H. Torigoe, A. Itadani, Y. Kuroda, T. Wakasugi, H. Kobayashi, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b008246p.
Combined experimental and computational approaches to elucidate the structures [54] S.R.G. Balestra, J.J. Gutiérrez-Sevillano, P.J. Merkling, D. Dubbeldam, S. Calero,
of silver clusters inside the ZSM 5 cavity, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) Simulation study of structural changes in zeolite RHO, J. Phys. Chem. C 117
23874–23887, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp508150w. (2013) 11592–11599, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp4026283.
[37] J. Mehara, A.K. Surendran, T. van Wieringen, D. Setia, C. Foroutan-Nejad, M. [55] J.L. Carter, V. Kevorkian, The adsorption of ethylene on a series of near-faujasite
Straka, L. Rulíšek, J. Roithová, Cationic gold(II) complexes: Experimental and zeolites studied by infrared spectroscopy and calorimetry, J. Phys. Chem. 70 (4)
theoretical study, Chemistry A Eur. J. 28 (60) (2022) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ (1966) 1126–1136, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100876a026.
chem.202201794. [56] M.S. Nechaev, V.M. Rayón, G. Frenking, Energy partitioning analysis of the
[38] J. Howard, K. Robson, T.C. Waddington, Z.A. Kadir, Inelastic neutron scattering bonding in ethylene and acetylene complexes of group 6, 8, and 11 met-
study of ethylene adsorbed on silver - A zeolite, Zeolites 2 (1982) 2–12, http: als, J. Phys. Chem. A 108 (2004) 3134–3142, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0144-2449(82)80033-X. chemmater.0c01016.
11