Jake Holmes 2010 'Dazed and Confused' Lawsuit - Scheduling Meeting of Counsel
Jake Holmes 2010 'Dazed and Confused' Lawsuit - Scheduling Meeting of Counsel
#:65
19
20 This case has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge
21 Dolly M. Gee. The responsibility for the progress of litigation in the federal courts
22 falls not only upon the attorneys in the action, but upon the court as well.
23 In order “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every
24 action,” (Fed. R. Civ. P. 1), all counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize
25 themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the
26 Central District of California.
27
28
Case 2:10-cv-04789-DMG-PJW Document 17 Filed 12/17/10 Page 2 of 6 Page ID
#:66
1 A Scheduling Conference is set for the date and time set forth in the
2 caption.1 Counsel shall meet at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the
3 Scheduling Conference to prepare a jointly signed report for the court to be
4 submitted no less than fourteen (14) days before the Scheduling Conference. The
5 report is to contain the items set forth below. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c), the
6 parties shall be represented by counsel with authority to enter into stipulations
7 regarding all matters pertaining to conduct of the case.
8 The joint report to be submitted shall contain the items listed in Fed. R. Civ.
9 P. 26(f), the parties’ recommendations and agreements, if any, about the final
10 scheduling order as listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1) through (6), and those items
11 listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c) which counsel believe will be useful to discuss at the
12 Scheduling Conference. Items which must be addressed are the following:
13 (1) initial disclosures, preservation of
discoverable information, and a discovery
14 plan, including a listing and proposed
schedule of written discovery, depositions,
15 and a proposed discovery cut-off date;
16 (2) a listing and proposed schedule of law and
motion matters, and a proposed dispositive
17 motion cut-off date;
18 (3) a statement of what efforts have been made
to settle or resolve the case to date and what
19 settlement procedure is recommended
pursuant to Local Rule 16-15.4 (specifically
20 excluding any statement of the terms
discussed);
21
(4) an estimated length of trial and a proposed
22 date for the final pretrial conference and for
trial;
23
24 1
Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party the Court would order that any
or all discovery is premature, it is advisable for counsel to begin to conduct discovery actively
25
before the Scheduling Conference required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). At the very least, the
26 parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and thereby obtain
and produce most of what would be produced in the early stage of discovery, because at the
27 Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines to complete discovery.
28 2
Case 2:10-cv-04789-DMG-PJW Document 17 Filed 12/17/10 Page 3 of 6 Page ID
#:67
1
(5) a discussion of other parties likely to be
2 added;
3 (6) whether trial will be by jury or to the court;
4 (7) any other issues affecting the status or
management of the case; and
5
(8) proposals regarding severance, bifurcation or other
6 ordering of proof.
7 In addition, the Scheduling Conference Report shall contain the following:
8 (1) a short synopsis of the principal issues in the
case;
9
(2) a statement of whether pleadings are likely
10 to be amended;
11 (3) a statement as to issues which any party
believes may be determined by motion.
12
13 At the Scheduling Conference, the court will set a date for discovery cut-
14 off,2 a final date by which motions must be filed and served, a final pretrial
15 conference date, and a trial date.
16 To facilitate the scheduling process, counsel shall complete the Schedule of
17 Pretrial and Trial Dates form attached as Exhibit A to this Order and attach
18 it to the Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The Court urges the parties to make every
19 effort to agree upon joint dates and deadlines. The entries in the “Time
20 Computation” column reflect what the Court believes are appropriate for most
21 cases and will allow the Court to rule on potentially dispositive motions
22 sufficiently in advance of the final pretrial conference. The form is designed to
23
24 2
This is not the date by which discovery requests must be served; but the date by which
all discovery is to be completed. Any motion challenging the adequacy of discovery responses
25
must be filed timely, served and calendared sufficiently in advance of the discovery cut-off date
26 to permit the responses to be obtained before that date, if the motion is granted. The Court
requires compliance with Local Rule 37-1 and 37-2 in the preparation and filing of discovery
27 motions. Except in the case of an extreme emergency which was not created by the lawyer
bringing the motion, discovery motions may not be heard on an ex parte basis.
28 3
Case 2:10-cv-04789-DMG-PJW Document 17 Filed 12/17/10 Page 4 of 6 Page ID
#:68
1 enable counsel to ask the Court to set different (earlier) last dates by which the key
2 requirements must be completed.
3 A continuance of the Scheduling Conference will be granted only for good
4 cause. The failure to submit a joint report in advance of the Scheduling
5 Conference or the failure to attend the Scheduling Conference may result in
6 the dismissal of the action, striking the answer and entering a default, and/or
7 the imposition of sanctions.
8 A settlement procedure appropriate to the particular case will be used in
9 every civil action pursuant to Local Rule 16-15.1. In the Scheduling Conference
10 Report, counsel are to recommend a specific settlement procedure provided for in
11 Local Rule 16-15 which will be utilized in this case. Available alternatives for
12 consideration, not to the exclusion of others, include:
13 (1) a settlement conference before the
magistrate or district judge assigned to this
14 case (Local Rule 16-15.4(1));
15 (2) appearance before an attorney selected from
the Attorney Settlement Officer Panel (Local
16 Rule 16-15.4(2));
17 (3) appearance before a retired judicial officer
or other private or non-profit dispute
18 resolution body for non-judicial settlement
or mediation proceedings (Local Rule 16-
19 15.4(3));
20 (4) such other settlement mechanism proposed
by the parties and approved by the court.
21
The report to the court as to the above items should be preceded by a
22
thorough and frank discussion among the attorneys for the parties. A Joint
23
Scheduling Report which does not comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f), and this
24
Order may cause continuance of the Scheduling Conference and a possible award
25
of sanctions under Rule 16(f) against the party or parties responsible. A
26
conformed courtesy copy of the Joint Report shall be delivered to the Courtroom
27
Deputy Clerk at the Clerk’s Office, Room G-19, by 12:00 p.m. on the business
28 4
Case 2:10-cv-04789-DMG-PJW Document 17 Filed 12/17/10 Page 5 of 6 Page ID
#:69
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 5
Case 2:10-cv-04789-DMG-PJW Document 17 Filed 12/17/10 Page 6 of 6 Page ID
#:70
Initial Expert Disclosure & Report Deadline at least 9 wks before FPTC
19
Rebuttal Expert Disclosure & Report Deadline at least 5 wks before FPTC
20
Expert Discovery Cut-Off (includes hearing of discovery at least 3 wks before FPTC
21 motions)
27
28 EXHIBIT A