CHE 411-L1 Post Laboratory Report 3 - AgmanaAndreyA
CHE 411-L1 Post Laboratory Report 3 - AgmanaAndreyA
Agmana, Andrey A.
College of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering
ChE – 3102
Real-world scenarios show localized differential pressure which can be attributed to decrease or increase in
pipe diameters, β ratio, presence of pipe tappings, and utilized manometric and process fluids. As such,
engineers measure these parameters to evaluate the ratio between the pipe’s actual discharge to the ideal
discharge using the coefficient of discharge (Cd), together with other variables such as volumetric flow rates,
differential pressure, and Reynolds number. Upon analysis, it was discovered that the difference in pressure
between the process and manometric fluids precisely correlates with the volumetric flow rate of a fluid inside
a particular pipe system. Furthermore, it became clear that the Reynolds number and the coefficient of
discharge had an inverse relationship. Hence, this study aims to establish the relationship of coefficient of
discharge to other variables which directly and indirectly affect the amount and quality of flow.
Figure 4.3. Relationship of log Q and log ΔHw at a In terms of slope values, it can be
Kerosene and CCL4 setup observed that setups which utilize CCL4 have the
lowest slope values of 79799.95494 (with water)
and 79789.30225 (with kerosene). On the other
hand, those which utilize Hg generate the highest
slope values of 275042.7524 (with water) and
274364.0571 (with kerosene). This suggests that a
weak power-law relationship exists in the setups of
CCL4, in practical terms, significant change in
pressure drop only constitutes a relatively small
change in its volumetric flow rate. Conversely, a
relatively higher power-law relationship exists in
the utilization of Hg, wherein the setups are
Figure 4.4. Relationship of log Q and log ΔHw at a strongly sensitive to changes in pressure drop and
Kerosene and Hg setup that slight increase in the aforementioned variable
can lead to a significant increase in its flow rate.
The logarithmic values of Q and ΔHw Despite this, such differences can be attributed to
demonstrate direct proportionality, which unknown variable influences and complex flow
indicates that the closer the logarithmic value of behavior of each setups.
ΔHw reaches equilibrium in the experiment, the
higher the logarithmic value of its resulting With regards to its intercept values, setups
volumetric flow rate.This is supported by the which utilize CCL4 have the highest intercept
graphical data above and the obtained coefficient values which are -2.34516997 (with water) and
-2.378736961 (with kerosene), while those which the different implications of other
utilize Hg in the setups have the lowest intercept variables to orifice diameter and
values of -36.85271439 (with water) and determination of pressure drops since the
-36.79322912 (kerosene). Considering that all of simulation used was constrained to only
the resulting intercept values are negative, this few interactive parts, aside from changing
suggests that each setup is, on average, the pipe diameters, manometric and
overestimating the y values, therefore a negative process fluids, and rotameter readings.
adjustment to the projected values is required. In Furthermore, it was also found out that
practical terms, this means that the expected value the orifice diameter in the simulation was
for the dependent variable (pressure drop) is lower nonfunctional.
than zero (Martin, n.d.). Furthermore, regardless if 2. Explore the underlying variables that may
the pressure drop is zero, an increase in the contribute to the determination of
discharge rate will still occur. differential pressure, volumetric flow rate,
Reynolds number, and coefficient of
CONCLUSION AND discharge, as well as evaluate their
RECOMMENDATIONS complex relationships.
3. It is advisable for the future researchers
In the field of fluid dynamics, orifice to also perform manual calculations in
meters play a key role in determining fluid flow determining the coefficient of discharge
measurements and the corresponding pressure since the value of Cd should be less than
differentials. This study has shown that significant 1.
changes in the volumetric flow rate (Q),
coefficient of discharge (Cd), and Reynolds REFERENCES
number (NRe) can result from calibration of
variables such as variations in pipe diameter ratios BYJU’S (n.d.). Relation between Pressure and
Density. Retrieved on October 6, 2023
(β), the locations of pipe tappings, and the
from
particular manometric and process fluids used. https://byjus.com/physics/relation-betw
Upon examination, it became evident that the een-pressure-and-density/#:~:text=Whe
volumetric flow rate of a fluid in a given pipe n%20density%20increases%2C%20press
system is directly proportional to the differential ure%20increases,density%20decreases%2
pressure between the process and manometric C%20the%20pressure%20decreases.
fluids and that there is an inverse correlation
ENGINEEREXCEL (n.d.). ORIFICE METER
between the Reynolds number and the coefficient
WORKING PRINCIPLES AND
of discharge. Furthermore, it was also found that APPLICATIONS. Retrieved on October
the utilization of Hg as a manometric fluid 2, 2023 from
constitutes a relatively more pressure-sensitive https://engineerexcel.com/orifice-meter/
system in comparison to CCL4; however, other
variables related to pipe flow should also be iopscience (2019). Estimation Optimal Value of
considered for accurate measurements. On the Discharge Coefficient in a Venturi Tubes .
Retrieved on October 5, 2023 from
other hand, to promote a much comprehensive
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108
analysis of the topic, several recommendations 8/1742-6596/1230/1/012087/pdf#:~:te
have been made: xt=The%20discharge%20coefficient%20i
1. Future researchers can explore a much s%20the,using%20the%20discharge%20c
more interactive online simulation oefficient%20value.
concerning the topic to understand more
Lumenlearning (n.d.). Fluid Dynamics. Retrieved
on October 2, 2023 from
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-
osuniversityphysics/chapter/14-5-fluid-dy
namics/
Table 2.1 Water and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 2.2 Water and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 2.3 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 2.4 Kerosene and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 2.5 Water and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.6 Water and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.7 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.8 Kerosene and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.9 Water and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 2.10 Water and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 2.11 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 2.12 Kerosene and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 2.13 Water and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.14 Water and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.15 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with corner tappings at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 2.16 Kerosene and Hg setup with corner tappings at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.1 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 3.2 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 3.3 Kerosene and CCL$ setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 3.4 Kerosene and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 3.5 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.6 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.7 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.8 Kerosene and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.9 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 3.10 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 3.11 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 3.12 Kerosene and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 3.13 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.14 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.15 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 3.16 Kerosene and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.1 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 4.2 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 4.3 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 4.4 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.25 nominal diameter
Table 4.5 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.6 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Flow rate Flow Rate delta H (cm velocity in orifice
(LPM) h1 (cm MF) h2 (cm MF) (m3/s) MF) delta H (m PF) (m/s) RE Cd
38.04 41.1 28.9 0.000634 12.2 153.72 807.2338714 807233.8714 146.9877402
0.00055833333
33.5 39.73 30.27 33 9.46 119.196 710.8920791 710892.0791 147.0008206
0.00049933333
29.96 38.78 31.22 33 7.56 95.256 635.770946 635770.946 147.0623262
0.00041683333
25.01 37.64 32.36 33 5.28 66.528 530.7286836 530728.6836 146.8984626
0.00033383333
20.03 36.69 33.31 33 3.38 42.588 425.0498014 425049.8014 147.0425817
0.00025016666
15.01 35.95 34.05 67 1.9 23.94 318.5220928 318522.0928 146.9685508
0.00016666666
10 35.42 34.58 67 0.84 10.584 212.2065908 212206.5908 147.2586711
0.00008383333
5.03 35.11 34.89 333 0.22 2.772 106.7399152 106739.9152 144.7361995
Table 4.7 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.8 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 0.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.10 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 4.11 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 4.12 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1 nominal diameter
Table 4.13 Water and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.14 Water and Hg setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.15 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter
Table 4.16 Kerosene and CCL4 setup with d & d/2 taps at a 1.5 nominal diameter