Geotechnical Engineering-1-2024-25-Unit-I
Geotechnical Engineering-1-2024-25-Unit-I
MANIT Bhopal
The soil composed of bulky grains are cohesive less soils. Its
plasticity effects is insignificant.
Example: non plastic silt and sand gravel.
Soil Phases
➢ Soil deposits comprise the accumulated solid particles plus
the void space between the particles
➢ Voids space not occupied by fluid are filled with air or other
gas.
𝑒 = 𝑉𝑜𝑖𝑑 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜
𝑤 = 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 also known as moisture content
𝐺𝑠 = 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑
𝑛 = 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝑆 𝑜𝑟 𝑆𝑟 = 𝐷𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Symbols for Phase Relations of soils
(3) Porosity n%
Volume of Voids,Vv
n=
Total Volume of Soil,V
Saturated
Note: The density/or unit weight are ratios which connects the volumetric
side of the PHASE DIAGRAM with the mass/or weight side.
Soil unit weights
(4) Unit Weight of Soil Solids
Weightof soil solids Ws
s = =
Volume of soil solid Vs
sub = sat w
Specific gravity, Gs
s
Gs = Gw = 1
w Gmercury = 13.6
Typical Values of Specific Gravity
1. Void ratio, e
2. Porosity, n
3. Degree of saturation, S or Sr
4. Water content, w
5. Unit weight, γ
6. Specific gravity, G or Gs
Use of Phase diagrams in finding relationships physical
properties
• Remember the following simple rules:
1. Remember the basic definitions of w, e, Gs, S, etc.
2. Draw a phase diagram.
3. Assume either Vs=1 or Vt=1 or ws = 1 depending on given
values.
4. Solve the phase diagram for required values.
If given e, assume Vs =1 Air
e
Water 1+e
Solids 1
If given w, assume Ws =1
Air
w
Water
1+w
1 Solids
1. Relationship between e and n
𝑉𝑣 𝑉𝑣
𝑒= =
𝑉𝑠 𝑉 − 𝑉𝑣
𝑉 𝑣 Τ𝑉
=
𝑉−𝑉𝑣 Τ𝑉
𝑛
=
𝑉Τ𝑉−𝑉𝑣Τ𝑉
𝑛
=
1−𝑛
Se = wGs
This is a very useful relation for solving THREE-PHASE
RELATIONSHIPS.
2. Relationship among e, S, w, and Gs
2. Relationship among e, S, w, and Gs
Using phase diagram Given: e, S, Gs required: w
Air
e
e S w Water eS
1+e
Gs w + e S w
Gs w Solids 1
Ww = e S w = e S
w= w Gs = e S
Ws G s w G s
3. Relationship among , e, S and Gs
e S w Water eS
1+e
Gs w + e S w
Gs w Solids 1
Wt = (Gs + eS ) w W G
= d = s = s w
Vt 1+ e Vt 1+ e
Wt (water filled with water) (Gs + e) w
sat = =
Vt 1+ e
Various Unit Weight Relationships
Solution of Phase Problems
• Method 1: Memorize relationships
Se = wGs = (Se + Gs ) w
1+ e
e
n=
1+ e d =
1+ w
• Method 2: Return to Basics
• Remember the following simple rules:
1. Remember the basic definitions of w, e, Gs, S, etc.
2. Draw a phase diagram.
Solids 1
If given w, assume Ws =1
Air
w
Water
1+w
1 Solids
Example 1:
•In its natural state, a moist soil has a total volume of 9344.56 cm3 and a mass
18.11 kg. The oven-dry mass of soil is 15.67 kg. If Gs = 2.67, calculate the
moisture content, moist unit weight, void ratio and degree of saturation.
3475.66 cm3
2.44 kg
18.11 kg 9344.56 cm3 2440cm3
111
Granular soils are qualitatively described according to their
relative densities as shown below
The use of relative density has been restricted to granular soils because of the
difficulty of determining emax in clayey soils. Liquidity Index in fine-grained
soils is of similar use as Dr in granular soils.
Remarks
The relative density of a natural soil very strongly affect its
engineering behavior.
assume Ws =1 kN Air
0.01931
0.098/9.8
9.8/100 = 1.098/19.2
Water 1=
0.098 0.00998 = 0.0572
1.098
Vv 0.01931
W
d = s =
1
= 17.48 kN/m 3 n= = 100 = 33.76%
Vt 0.0572 Vt 0.0572
Vw 0.00998
e=
VV 0.01931
= = 0.51kN/m 3 S= = 100 = 51.68%
VS 0.03789 Vv 0.01931
Example-2
• Field density testing (e.g., sand replacement method) has shown bulk
density of a compacted road base to be 2.06 t/m3 with a water content of
11.6%. Specific gravity of the soil grains is 2.69. Calculate the dry density,
porosity, void ratio and degree of saturation.
Water Content
Importance of the Water Content of Soil
1.The water content of soil can be used as the index property to indicate the behaviour and
state of the soil.
2.Some physical properties of soil such as bearing capacity, settlement, dry unit weight
can be calculated when we know the water content of the soil sample.
3.Since the water content of soil sample changes during its transportation and storage.
Water content test should be the first test that is conducted immediately after it is received
in the laboratory.
4.The water content of soil can be determined accurately because it involves the
measurement of weights only. (Weights can be measured more accurately than volumes)
Indian Standard Code dealing with the determination of water content of the soil
is IS 2720 (Part 2)
Water Content
The water content of the soil is a critical parameter that controls the engineering
behaviour of soil. The following are some methods used to determine the water
content:
3. Alcohol Method
5. Pycnometer Method
6. Radiation Method
Precautions:
1. The temperature in the oven should not get more than 1100 C because above this
temperature, the water of crystallisation may be lost.
2. Dry soil may absorb water from the moist soil, dried samples should be removed before
placing wet samples in the oven.
3. For inorganic soil, temperature is maintained between 105-110˚C for 24 hours.
4. For organic soil, it is not increased beyond 60˚C in order to avoid oxidation of organic
matters. For soil having gypsum, temperature is limited to 80˚C to avoid the loss of
structural water.
Sand Bath Method
Sand bath method is a field method to determine the water content of soil. It is a rapid but
less accurate method.
Apparatus: Sand bath, tray, weighing machine, palette knife (Spatula)., stove or spirit
lamp
Note: A sand bath is a large, open vessel containing sand.
Procedure:
1.Clean and Weigh the empty tray (W1)
2.Take the soil sample in the tray. The sample should be crumbled and loosely placed in
the tray. Put some pieces of white paper on the sample. Weight the tray with the wet soil
sample (W2).
Calculations:
1.Place the tray on the sand bath. The sand bath is heated over a stove
for 20-60 minutes to dry the sample. The drying should continue till
the sample attain a constant mass.
2.During heating, the sample is turned with the palette knife.
Overheating of soil sample should be avoided. The white paper turns
brown when overheating occurs.
3.After drying the sample is removed from the sand bath, cooled and
weighed (W3)
Alcohol Method
In this method, the drying process is completed by methylated spirit.
Apparatus Required: Air-tight container, knife, methylated spirit.
Procedure:
1.Take the weight of the clean and empty container (W1).
2. Place the soil sample loosely in the container and weigh the container with soil (W2)
3. Mix the methylated spirit (@ 1 mg per gm of soil with the wet soil.
4. Ignite the mixture. The mixed contents should be stirred by a knife to ensure complete drying.
5. After that the methylated spirit is completely burned away, the container is cooled with
desiccator.
6. Take the weight of the container and the dried soil (W3).
7. Since there is no control over temperature, it is not generally suitable for organic soil and soil
with gypsum content.
Calculations:
Calcium Carbide Method
It is one of the quickest field method which gives the result within 5-7 minutes.
Calcium carbide method is based on the principle that when water in soil sample reacts
with Calcium carbide (CaC2), acetylene gas (C2H2) is produced. The water content of the
soil sample can be found indirectly from the pressure of the acetylene gas formed, It is
also called as Speedy or Rapid moisture test.
Apparatus: Airtight containers, Calcium carbide, Dial gauge
Procedure:
1.Take the soil sample in powdered form in the container and mix it thoroughly with the
calcium carbide.
2.The acetylene gas produced exert pressure on the diaphragm.
3.The dial gauge is so calibrated that it gives the water content of soil directly based on the
total mass (wt).
(4-6 g of sample is placed in moisture meter and calcium carbide is added in it which reacts
with the water present in the sample resulting in the formation of acetylene gas that exerts
pressure over the gauge which is further calibrated to give water content of soil in terms of
total mass of soil.)
CaC2 + H2O → C2H2 ↑ + Ca(OH)2
Calculations: The water content of the soil sample based on the dry mass is determined as:
w = w’ / (1 – w’)
Pycnometer Method
Pycnometer method can be used only if the specific gravity of soil particles are known.
It’s a rapid method (Give results in 10-20 min) of testing a soil sample of known specific
weight. This method is perfect for coarse-grained soil and it’s not perfectly applicable for
fine-grained soil. The pycnometer is a bottle of size 900 ml and a brass conical cap is
used for cover. The conical cap is screwed up with a bottle and a rubber washer is added
inside the conical cap to prevent the leakage of water through walls of pycnometer and
conical cap.
Apparatus Required: Pycnometer, Tamping rod or vacuum tube
Note: Pycnometer is a glass jar of about 1-litre volume and fitted with a brass conical cap
having a small hole at its apex.
Procedure:
1.The clean and empty pycnometer with cap is taken and the weight is recorded (W1)
2.Place 200-400 gm of the moist soil sample in the pycnometer and determine its
weight (W2).
3.Fill the remaining volume of pycnometer gradually with distilled water or kerosene.
4.Remove the entrapped air either by heating and shaking the pycnometer or by applying
a vacuum.
5.Weigh the pycnometer with soil, water/kerosene (W3).
6.Empty the pycnometer and after cleaning thoroughly, fill it with water/kerosene and
take its weight (W4).
Calculations: We this formula to determine the water content-
w = [(W2 – W1)/(W3 -W4) × (G – 1)÷G) -1 ]
Radiation Method
Radiation method is used to determine the water content of the soil in in-situ conditions.
Apparatus Required: Steel Casings, Emitters, Detectors, radioactive material (Cobalt 60)
Procedure:
1.The device containing a radio-active isotopes material (such as cobalt 60) is placed in a
capsule.
2.It is then lowered in a steel casing, placed in a borehole. The steel casing has a small
opening on its side through which rays come out.
3.A detector is placed inside another steel casing, which also has an opening facing the first
casing.
4.Neurons are emitted by radioactive materials. The water of soil cause loss of energy as a
result of scattering of neutrons by hydrogen atoms.
5.The loss of energy is proportional to the quantity of water present in the soil. The detector is
calibrated to give the water content directly.
Precautions: The radiation method should be used carefully as it may cause the radiation
problem. Therefore proper shielding should be ensured.
Radiation Method
In this field method, two steel casings are lowered into medium. In first casing,
radioactive material (cobalt-60) is placed and in other casing, detector is placed.
When radioactive material is activated, it emits neutron which strikes with the hydrogen
atom present in water and losses its energy, which is detected by detector placed in
another casing. This loss of energy is further calibrated with water content of soil.
Torsion Balance Method
The two main requirements for torsion balance method are:
1.The infrared lamp: This is a 250 W lamp. The lamp operates on single-phase AC of
voltage 220 to 230V. There is provision to control and regulate the input voltage in order
2.The torsion balance: This unit is assembled over a magnetic damper which helps to
reduce the pan vibration. The torsion balance is calibrated to give water content in a
range of 1 to 100 percent with a least count of 0.2 percent. In order to read the
Celsius. In this method, there is no requirement for separate physical balance. The
balance scale called a drum is divided into different moisture contents w' which is
Torsion Balance method is very useful for soils which quickly re-absorb moisture from the
environment after drying. In this method, weighing and drying occur simultaneously.
Torsion balance is calibrated to give water content directly.
Apparatus Required: Infrared lamp, Torsional balance.
Procedure:
1.Keep the soil sample in the sample pan of the infrared lamp and spread evenly.
2.Start the infrared lamp and keep the temperature under 110-degree Celcius.
3.The water content can be read directly from the drum scale.
4.When the pointer of the drum scale become stationary, it indicates the soil has dried
(attained constant mass). This reading is the water content based on the dry weight (w’)
Calculations: Water content, w = w’ / (1 – w’)
Unit weights of Soil
In laboratory and field conditions, the bulk unit weight is measured using
the following approaches:
This is the volume of wax used to cover the soil sample. Next we take a container with
overflow management attached to it. Overflow management means if we keep on
filling this container with some liquid even after reaching its full capacity, the extra
liquid should not just spill over around but with a proper management it should get
collected.
Now fill this container up to the brim with water. Gradually lower the coated sample
into it. Because of it water level will rise and overflow water will be collected into the
measuring jar.
Lets say measured volume is Vw. This is the volume of water displaced by coated soil
sample.
Now as we know volume of displaced liquid is equal to the volume of object which
displaced it hence volume of collected water is equal to the volume of coated sample.
now this displaced liquid volume is volume of soil sample plus volume of wax.
Now by simply applying unit weight formula, we can calculate unit weight of soil
sample which will be equal to weight of soil sample only divided by its volume.
In situ Unit Weight of Soil By Core Cutter Method:
Procedure
1. Measure the height (ℎ) and internal diameter (𝑑) of the core cutter and calculate its
volume.
2. Weigh the empty core cutter without dolly as (𝑊1) g.
3. Clean and level the location where density is to be determined.
4. Drive the core cutter, with a steel dolly on its top, into the soil to its full depth with the help
of a steel rammer, so that half of dolly will remain above the ground.
5. Excavate the soil around the cutter with a and gently lift the cutter filled with soil.
6. Weigh the core cutter with filled with soil (𝑊2), after trimming the top and bottom
surfaces of the sample and cleaning the outside surface of the cutter
7. Calculate bulk density of field soil as 𝛾 = (𝑊2 − 𝑊1) / 𝑉
8. Remove the soil from the core cutter, using a sample extractor and take representative soil
sample from it to determine the moisture content using any one method as 𝑤 %.
9. Calculate dry density of field soil as 𝛾𝑑 = (𝛾) / (1 + 𝑤)
10. Repeat all above steps two more locations in the field to determine average dry density of soil.
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample
3
Determining density of sand
Mass of empty core cutter (𝑊1) g
Mass of core cutter filled with field soil (𝑊2) g
Bulk Density of soil 𝛾 = (𝑊2 − 𝑊1) / 𝑉 , g /cc.
Water content
Container No.
Mass of empty container with lid (𝑤1) g
Mass of container with lid and wet soil (𝑤2) g
Mass of container with lid and dry soil (𝑤3) g
Mass of water (𝑤𝑤 = 𝑤2 − 𝑤3) g
Mass of dry soil (𝑤𝑠 = 𝑤3 − 𝑤1) g
Water content in % 𝑤 = (𝑤𝑤 / 𝑤𝑠) 𝑥 100
In situ Unit Weight of Sand Replacement Method: Procedure
1. Remove the cap of sand pouring cylinder, close the shutter, fill the test sand passing
through 1mm and retained on 600 µm from the top.
2. Find the mass of sand pouring cylinder with sand (𝑊1). Place the sand pouring
cylinder over the calibration container, open the shutter and allow the sand to flow out
for filling the calibration container. Close the shutter.
3. Place this sand pouring cylinder now on a clean and plane surface. Open the shutter
and allow the sand to flow out for filling cone fully. Close the shutter, remove the sand
pouring cylinder, collect the sand which occupied in the cone and find out its mass
(𝑊2).
4. Refill the sand pouring cylinder with sand such that it weighs equal to initial mass
𝑊1. Place the sand pouring cylinder centrally on the calibration container with
volume 𝑉1.
5. Open the shutter and allow the sand to fill in the calibration container and cone
completely. Close the shutter and find the mass of cylinder with remaining sand as
(𝑊3).
6. Refill the sand pouring cylinder with sand such that it weighs equal to initial mass
𝑊1 and take it to the field, along with metal tray and trowel.
7. Place metal tray having central hole on the prepared ground, and excavate the
soil using trowel up to 150 mm (approximately) depth, remove loose soil
carefully and collect it in the metal container
8. Remove the metal tray having central hole, place the sand pouring cylinder full
of sand centrally over excavated pit.
9. Open the shutter and allow sand to fill in excavated pit and cone completely.
Close the shutter and take it to laboratory to find the mass of cylinder with
remaining sand (𝑊4).
10. Find the mass of soil collected from the pit (𝑊).
11. Determine water content of collected soil by oven drying method as 𝑤.
Repeat the steps two times more to get average value of dry density of field soil
Observations:
Internal diameter of calibrating container (𝑑) = cm.
Internal height of calibrating container (ℎ) = cm.
Volume of calibrating container (𝑉1) = cm3.
(𝑊5 = 𝑊1 – 𝑊4 – 𝑊2) g
Volume of collected soil = Volume of pit
= Volume of sand filled in excavated pit
(𝑉 = 𝑊5 / 𝛾𝑠 ) cc
Bulk density (𝛾 =𝑊/𝑉) g /cc
Rubber Balloon Method
In the RUBBER BALLOON Method the volume is
determined by inserting a balloon into the excavation and
filling it with water or an other fluid with known density.
Water Tower
with Scale
Valve
Rubber
Membran
e
Specific Gravity of Soil’s
To determine the specific gravity of soil, you need to collect a representative
soil sample and prepare it by removing any large particles. The following
are the methods for determining the sp. Gr. Of the soil.
➢ Pycnometer method
capillary hole.
• Pycnometer (900ml)
4. Put 10 ml of distilled water in the bottle to allow the soil to soak completely. Leave it
for about 2 hours.3
Test Procedure:
5. Again, fill the bottle completely with distilled water put the stopper and keep the bottle
under constant temperature water baths (Tx℃).
6. Take the bottle outside and wipe it clean and dry note. Now determine the weight of the
bottle and the contents (W3).
7. Now empty the bottle and thoroughly clean it. Fill the bottle with only distilled water and
weigh it. Let it be W4 at temperature (Tx℃).
8. Repeat the same process for 2 to 3 times, to take the average reading of it.
Calculation:
Weight of substance
Specific gravity of soil= weight of an equal volume of water
2
W −W
1
= (W −W )−(W
2 1
−W )3 4
Specific Gr. Values are generally reported at 270C. If T0C is the test
temperature the specific gravity at 270C is given by
0 0 Sp. Gr. of water at T0C
Gs27 C= GsT C x
Sp. Gr. of water at 270C
1.Density bottle method
•It is a laboratory method in which a density bottle with a stopper with a hole is used to
determine the specific gravity of soil particles.
•Most of the time, a 50-ml density bottle is used in the test [IS: 2720 Part 2].
•At 105 to 110°C, the density bottle is cleaned, dried, and then cooled. The weight of
the bottle and the weight of the cap is measured.
•About 5 to 10 grams of oven-dried soil samples are transferred in the bottle and
weighed.
•If the sample has coarser particles, it must be ground down until it fits through a 2-mm
sieve before the test.
•The sample is then covered with distilled water. The water soaks into the soil for about
two hours. Until the bottle is half full, more water is added to it.
In a vacuum desiccator, a vacuum pressure of about 55cm of mercury is used for
about an hour to get rid of air trapped in the soil. An alternative way of getting rid
of the entrapped air is by heating the soil. To make the bottle full, more water is
added to it, and after that, the cap is put on top of the bottle. The weight is then
measured.
The bottle is then emptied, washed, and refilled with distilled water. The bottle
needs to be filled to the same level as before. The water in the bottle is measured.
Let
M1= Mass of empty bottle,
M2 = Mass of bottle and dry soil,
M3= Mass of bottle, soil, and water, and
M4= Mass of bottle filled with water.
If the mass of solids Ms is subtracted from M3 and replaced by the mass of water
equal to the volume of the solids, the mass M4 can be obtained.
Specific Gravity G= Ms/(Ms+M4-M3)
• At times, Kerosene can also be used instead of water. If Gk is kerosene's specific
gravity at the test temperature, the Specific Gravity of Soil formula is:
• Other liquids like paraffin, alcohol, and benzene are also sometimes used.
• The density bottle method works for fine-grained soils, which have more than 90%
of their particles passing through a 2mm IS sieve.
• But the method can also be used for medium-grained and coarse-grained soils in
case the particles are fine enough to pass through a 2mm IS sieve.
2.Pycnometer method
The method of determining Specific gravity of soil by Pycnometer (900 ml) is similar to
the density bottle (50ml) method. Since the pycnometer comprises a large apparatus,
around 200 and 300g of oven-dried soil is required for the test.
The Pycnometer method can be used for any kind of soil, but it works best with
medium-grained soils like Sands. It is suitable for soils passing more than 90% through
G= (M2-M1)/[(M2-M1)-(M3-M4)]
Where, M1= Mass of empty pycnometer, M2= Mass of pycnometer and dry soil
M3= Mass of pycnometer, soil, and water, M4= Mass of pycnometer filled with water
only
3.Measuring flask method
This test comprises a measuring flask with a graduation mark at the 250 ml (or 500 ml)
level and is similar to the density bottle method.
It comes with an adaptor for hooking it up to a vacuum line in order to get rid of any
entrapped air.
This method works well with both fine- and medium-grained soils.
Plastic Limit (wP or PL):Plastic limit is defined as the minimum water content at which
soil just begin to crumble when rolled into a thread of approximately 3 mm in diameter.
Lowest water content where the clay is still plastic
Shrinkage Limit (wS or SL):Shrinkage limit is the maximum water content at which a
reduction in water content will not cause a decrease in the soil volume.
At w<SL, no volume reduction on drying
Liquid Limit
Name of experiment: Determination of liquid limit using Casagrande's liquid
limit apparatus (IS 2720).
Aim: To determine the liquid limit of the given soil sample using Casagrande's
liquid limit apparatus.
Apparatus required: Casagrande's liquid limit apparatus, grooving tool, IS sieve
of 425 µm, mixing dishes, weighing balance, spatulas, oven.
ASTM Tool, Casagrande Tool
Bottom=2 mm - 2mm
Top=13.6 mm – 11 mm
Height= 10 mm – 8 mm
LL Test Results
Log N
25
2. Compute the
average of water
content to determine
the plastic limit
174
Shrinkage Limit
Name of experiment: Determination of shrinkage limit of the soil (IS 2720)
Procedure:
➢ Take about 100 gm of the soil sample from passing through 425 µm IS
sieve.
➢ Take a part of the soil sample in an evaporating dish and mix with distilled
water till the voids are filled in.
➢ Weigh the empty shrinkage dish (𝑊1). Fill the paste in the shrinkage dish
in three equal layers, after coating inside of the dish with a thin layer of
grease or oil.
➢ Dry the sample in air for 6 to 8h, till the colour of the sample becomes
light and then in the oven at temperature 105° C to 110° C for 12 to 16 h.
➢ Weigh the shrinkage dish with oven-dried soil and note as 𝑊3.
PL w% LL
PI = LL - PL
Plastic (remoldable)
175
Soil classification is the division of soil into groups in which the
behaviours of the soils within a specific group are identical under a
particular set of physical conditions. Soil classification is a useful tool for
engineers as it helps them understand and interpret a given soil's
performance and decide the soil's suitability for different engineering
applications.
❖ If we classify and categorize soils, it will be convenient
for us to study them. We arrange the soils into different
groups such that soils in a particular group have similar
behaviour. This arranging of soils is called classification
system of soil.
❖ Any soil classification system must provide us the
information about the expected engineering properties of
a soil. It works as a language of communication
between engineers. Classification is done so as to
convey the same meaning universally.
Purpose:
Sieve Analysis
• This test is performed to determine the percentage of different
grain sizes contained within a soil.
• The mechanical or sieve analysis is performed to determine the
distribution of the coarser, larger-sized particles, and the
hydrometer method is used to determine the distribution of the
finer particles.
Significance:
• The distribution of different grain sizes affects the engineering
properties of soil.
• Grain size analysis provides the grain size distribution, and it is
required in classifying the soil.
Major Soil Groups
(2)Calculate the percent retained on each sieve by dividing the weight retained
on each sieve by the original sample weight.
(3)Calculate the percent passing (or percent finer) by starting with 100 percent
and subtracting the percent retained on each sieve as a cumulative procedure.
139
I.S sieve Weight retained in Percentage Cumulative Percentage
number or each sieve (gm) retained on percentage finer
size in mm each sieve retained
4.75
4.00
3.36
2.40
1.46
1.20
0.60
0.30
0.15
0.075
Grain size distribution
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
D60
Cu =
D10 x% of the soil has particles
D302 smaller than Dx
Cc =
( D60 D10 )
100
80
Finer
60
%
40
20
0
0.0 0 0 1 0.0 0 1 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
Result:
𝐷10:
𝐷30:
𝐷60:
𝐶𝑢:
𝐶𝑐:
Soil classification:
100
80
hydrometer sieve
% Passing
60
fines sands gravels
40
D10 = 0.013 mm
20
D D30 = 0.47 mm
30
D60 = 7.4 mm
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
153
Question: What is the Cu for a soil with only one grain size?
Coefficient of uniformity
Finer
D 60
Cu = =1
D10
Small particles of particular size range in liquid suspension have a tendency to settle
down due to multiple type of forces acting on them. This behaviour of particles is known
as sedimentation.
In soil mechanics we use this property of small particles to analyze the particle size
distribution. Particle size distribution is the method of separation of soil sample into
different fractions based on their particles sizes.
Particles of size smaller than 75 micron cannot be sieved because smaller particles carry
charges on their surface and have tendency to stick to each other and other particles, even
to the sieves or to the experimenter’s hand. So handling such kind of soils would be very
difficult.
So to analyze soils containing these particles we use the method sedimentation
analysis. This method is based on the Stokes law.
According to this law a small particle in a liquid suspension tries to settle down
due to its own weight under the action of gravity. And because of acceleration
due to gravity its downward velocity keeps on increasing.
In this equation these quantities are constant for a particular soil and water and
viscosity is constant for a particular temperature.
So we can see the relationship between settling terminal velocity of the particle
and its diameter.
We can see that larger the diameter of a particle, higher its speed will be and
smaller the particle slower it will settle to the bottom.
Now by simple equation of motion we know that velocity of any particle which falls
through a height of He centimeter in time t mins, would be He upon t. Here substitute
the value of velocity from the equation number 1 and we get this equation.
We need to mix dispersing agent because fine soil particles tends to stick to each other
and in the liquid suspension they form bigger flocs. These flocs behave like a single
particle and according to above established equation number 1, they settle with greater
speed than the individual particles should settle. Hence true sedimentation results cannot
be obtained.
Dispersing-agent-preperation
There is also a method given for the preparation of dispersing agent. We prepare it by
mixing 33 gm of sodium hexameta-phosphate and 7 gm of sodium carbonate to one litre
of distilled water.
Back to our sample, after mixing the dispersing agent the sample is stirred with a
mechanical stirrer for few minutes.
Then sample is transferred to a measuring jar and distilled water is added to it to
make the suspension volume 1000 ml.
By placing a hand over the jar make the jar upside down a few times so as to
ensure complete mixing.
Here we assume that our suspension is
completely mixed and is homogeneous. That
means we assume that all the soil particles of
different sizes are uniformly distributed
throughout the suspension and concentration of
particles of different sizes is the same at all
depths. This means the number of different
sized particles at any depth is the same.
For clarity let’s take fewer particles and show all the particles of different sizes separated.
As per the equation number 1 we can know particles of larger diameter will have higher
settling velocity and will settle earlier then small sized particles.
At the beginning of the sedimentation, amount of particles at any layer of the
suspension will be same. But as time proceeds, particles start settling down and
amount of particles of different layers become different.
By taking weight of highlighted layer at the beginning and after time t we can
simply calculate percentage finer.
To determine the weight of soil particles on this layer we employ two methods
1. Pipette method
2. Hydrometer method
In the pipette method the weight of solids is determined directly by collecting
sample of soil suspension from a specified sampling depth using pipette.
In hydrometer method the weight of solids is calculated indirectly by reading
the density of soil suspension on hydrometer.
There are some limitations of the Stokes law, and hence sedimentation analysis
does not give correct values of the particle size analysis and the percentage
finer. These limitations are eventually also the limitations of both pipette and
hydrometer method.
Limitations of Stoke’s Law
1. Stokes law is based on the assumption that all the soil particles are
spherical. But fine soils particles are never spherical and actually are flaky or
needle shaped in reality.
2. Specific gravity of solids for different particles is different, but we use its
average value.
3. Stokes law is applicable when fall of particle is in the liquid which has
infinite extent, that is no boundary is present. But our suspension is in the
jar and its walls affect the results to some extent as falling particles may
collide with the wall.
4. We have also assumed that there is no interference on the movement of a
particle by other surrounding particles. But practically there is a lot of
interference. Particles may collide and may change their course and velocity.
However it has been shown that for suspension of 50 gm per litre or less
particle to particle influence is negligible.
5. Sedimentation analysis cannot be used for particles of size larger than 0.2
mm because they may cause to generate turbulent conditions and stokes law is
not applicable for that.
6. Sedimentation analysis is also not applicable for particles smaller than 0.2
micron because such small particles may set Brownian motion in the
suspension and these particles do not settle as per stokes law.
Sedimentation Analysis- Hydrometer Method
Hydrometer is an instrument used to measure the relative density of liquids
based on the concept of buoyancy. Relative density means density of a
substance relative to the density of reference substance. That is, it is the ratio
the density of the substance to the density of the reference substance.
In hydrometer method this effective depth He is not constant. Because the depth at
which hydrometer takes its readings keeps on changing with time.
Casagrande has shown that hydrometer gives the value of specific gravity at the
center of its bulb.
Now as time proceeds, particles start settling down, according to the Stoke’s
Law large particles settles with greater speed than small particles do.
The lower layers of the suspension have higher
specific gravity than that of upper layers.
With time few particles settle to the bottom leaving the suspension with lesser
amount of soil particles, which makes the suspension lighter or less dense. That is
its density and specific gravity decreases. Hence in equilibrium condition of
hydrometer, now suspension provides lesser buoyant force to the hydrometer. That
means, hydrometer’s weight being constant and buoyant force decreasing,
hydrometer starts settling down. And with it changes its readings.
Then how do we measure the depth at which hydrometer is taking the
reading.
Hydrometer is still taking the reading at the layer AA but that particular layer has
risen up to the AA’.
❖ Let’s say the cross-sectional area of the jar is capital A. so rise of the layer AA will
be half the volume of the hydrometer divided by the cross-sectional area of the jar.
❖ Now to determine the rise of the top layer BB, notice hydrometer’s bulb is fully
submerged below this layer and hence whole hydrometer’s volume will be
responsible for the rise of this layer. So rise will be volume of hydrometer divided
by the jar cross-sectional area.
❖ Now we can calculate effective depth as height of hydrometer’s submerged neck H
plus half height of the hydrometer bulb h/2 minus rise in the layer BB plus rise in
the layer AA.
❖ After complete mixing the jar is placed and a stopwatch is started. Then we
insert the hydrometer in the suspension to note down our first reading which is
taken after 30 seconds.
❖ Further readings are taken after 1 minute, 2 minutes and 4 minutes.
❖ After taking these readings hydrometer is taken out from the jar and floated in to
another cylinder containing distilled water.
We take more readings after 8 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8
and 24 hours from the beginning of the sedimentation.
❖ Now if we notice, the reading we noted is not the correct specific gravity of
soil suspension as this suspension also contains particles of dispersing
agent.
❖ Also by the effect of meniscus we happened to take the false reading.
❖ There is another problem that hydrometer is calibrated at a particular
temperature and the temperature at which we are experimenting may be
different.
❖ Hence to rectify these mis-readings we apply few corrections to the
readings we take.
First one is Meniscus Correction:
We know liquid’s top surface get curved near any other surface
because of the effect of surface tension. This is called meniscus.
❖ In our case we will always take the lower reading than the
actual hence meniscus correction will always be positive.
Meniscus correction is denoted as capital Cm.
❖ We can determine this meniscus correction by taking the
reading at the top and bottom of meniscus in distilled water
cylinder, as we can see both the meniscus in the distilled
water.
Second one is Temperature Correction:
Hydrometers are generally calibrated at 27°C temperature, so if the
temperature of the suspension is different from 27C, we need to apply the
temperature correction to the reading we take.
❖ Generally if temperature of any liquid rises, its density decreases
which causes liquid to provide lesser buoyant force to the hydrometer.
Consequently hydrometer settles more to give us the lesser reading.
❖ Remember: hydrometer readings decrease upwards. So in this case
temperature correction will be positive. And on the other hand if the
test temperature is lower than 27C the liquid will be denser. Buoyant
force will increase and hence hydrometer will go less deep than it
should. So reading will be higher than the actual and in this case
temperature correction will be negative. Hence temperature
correction, which is denoted by capital Ct, can be both positive and
negative.
Third correction is Dispersing Agent Correction:
Let’s write this equation as equation number one. And numerator as 1A and
denominator as 1B.
For 1B, at time t = 0 suspension is homogenous and if we take weight of solids that is
weight of soil particles of any two layers of the suspension, it will be same. So weight of
soil particles per ml in any layer will be total weight of soil sample initially taken
divided by the total volume of the soil suspension.
Now for 1A
After time t particles will be in this position and
hydrometer takes reading at this layer. So let’s
say volume of this layer is Vlayer.
Weight of soil particles per ml in this layer will
be Wsolids in layer divided by Vlayer.
We estimate weight of solids present at this layer using the hydrometer reading.
Let’s imagine this hydrometer reading at that layer after application of all the
corrections becomes R. And we represent hydrometer reading as this.
It is the specific gravity value of the suspension at this layer. Now we know that
specific gravity is equal to unit weight of suspension at this layer (Ylayer) to the
unit weight of water. Also gamma layer can be written as weight of suspension in
this layer divided by volume of this layer (Vlayer).
Weight of this layer will be weight of water and weight soil particles present in
this layer.
Lets re-write the equation and represent water and solids of this layer as occupying
certain volume in this layer.
From this we can write weight of water present in this layer as unit weight of water
multiplied by volume of water present in this layer.
Here we can write volume of water as volume of layer minus volume of solids
present in that layer.
Now we can write volume of solids as (Ws/ GYw) using simple specific gravity
formula.
Here we are going to take all our measurements in gram and centimeters, so unit
weight of water gamma w will be equal to 1 gram per centimeter cube.
Now we have calculated what we needed to determine the percentage finer.
Let’s substitute that and rearrange it.
So finally we get the value of the percentage finer than particle of size D present
in a soil sample using hydrometer.
As the time proceeds we take hydrometer
readings at different times and we get
different values of specific gravity of
suspension. Consequently different values of
the percentage finer.
Using all these values we plot a graph
between percentage finer than D and the
diameter of the particle D.
Sedimentation Analysis by Pipette Method
Pipette method is one of the methods of taking observation of liquid soil
suspension for the purpose of sedimentation analysis of soils containing fine
particles.
For the preparation of soil suspension we took some 50 gm of oven dried soil
sample which weighed as Wtotal.
We mix 100 ml of dispersing agent to our taken sample.
Dispersing agent is prepared by mixing two components to 1 litre of distilled
water.
The weight of dispersing agent’s particles is Wdispersing agent.
And finally distilled water was added to make the solution 1000 ml.
Lets say this total volume as capital V.
➢ For pipette method we need only 500 ml of soil suspension.
➢ We require this kind of arrangement to take out a small
portion of suspension from a specified depth time to time.
Sedimentation jar is placed below this pipette.
➢ First we determine the volume of the pipette. For that we use
distilled water. We immerse the nozzle of the pipette into this
water and using stop cock arrangement we suck up the water
in the pipette. Then we discharge this water into measuring
jar and volume of the pipette can be known. Lets say this
volume as Vpipette.
➢ Now for the sampling, first sedimentation jar containing
the prepared soil suspension is placed in constant
temperature of 27°C for about an hour.
➢ The jar is then taken out and a rubber bung is placed at its
top to close its mouth. Then tube is inverted a few times so
that suspension becomes homogeneous. Bung is removed
and jar is placed over the constant temperature bath.
➢ The pipette arrangement is fixed over the jar and a stop
watch is started to record the time of settlement of
particles.
➢ Particles in the suspension start settling down. According to
the equation…
➢ When 2 minutes elapsed then we take our
first sample. Pipette is gradually lowered to
the depth of 100 mm into the suspension
about 20 seconds before the sample is to be
taken.
➢ By our established formula we can
determine in time 2 mins, that is 120
seconds, D sized soil particle would have
traveled to the 100 mm distance. So in and
above this layer we will find all the particles
of size smaller than D.
We will be taking all our samples from this depth. The sample is sucked
into the pipette using stop cock and pipette is taken out.
➢ The taken sample is then transferred to the weighing bottle. If any particle remains
adhered to the tube, the distilled water is used to transfer it into the bottle. Then the
sample is dried in oven at 105°C to 110°C for 24 hours.
➢ After drying weight of the sample is taken and say it as WDry.
Now here we have
➢ Total weight of solids in the suspension.
➢ Weight of particles of dispersing agent.
and weight of solids of small sample taken after 2 mins W(Dry), which has only
particles smaller than a particular diameter.
But all of weight of solids W(Total) contained in the volume capital V which we took
as 1000 ml and weight of particles of dispersing agent W(Dispersing Agent) is also
contained in the volume V. But weight of solids of extracted sample W(Dry) are in the
volume of pipette V(pipette) which is only 10 ml.
So lets represent each in per ml weight so that we can compare them with each other.
➢ As we know percentage finer is weight of sample with particles of size smaller
than D divided by weight of the total soil sample with all the particles present in
suspension.
➢ As our extracted dried sample contains all the particles of size smaller than D and
total sample has particles of all sized in it.
➢ So in the percentage finer equation lets substitute per ml weight of extracted
sample which contains all the particles smaller than size D. And in the
denominator substitute per ml weight of all the particles of all sizes.
➢ Also notice that this extracted sample also has some particles of dispersing agent,
so lets remove their concentration in the equation.
This is how we calculate the percentage finer with the pipette method.
In similar fashion more samples are taken after 4, 8, 15 and 30 mins and 1, 2, 4, 8
and 24 hours and percentage finer for different sized particles can be known.
This method’s merit is that it is very accurate.
But demerits are:
Apparatus is quite delicate and expensive. It also requires very sensitive weighing
balance for smaller extracted samples from the suspension. Also The procedure is
very long.
For quick particle size analysis of fine particles hydrometer method is more
suitable.
Engineering Classification of Soils
Overview
124
❖ There are numerous amounts of soils present on the surface of earth each containing
soil particles of different sizes, shapes and composition.
❖ If we classify and categorize soils, it will be convenient for us to study them. We
arrange the soils into different groups such that soils in a particular group have similar
behaviour. This arranging of soils is called classification system of soil.
❖ Any soil classification system must provide us the information about the expected
engineering properties of a soil. It works as a language of communication between
engineers. Classification is done so as to convey the same meaning universally.
❖ An engineer in one country classifies a soil as SW then another engineer in some other
country should be able to understand what kind of soil the other engineer is talking
about.
❖ Of course, we need to do a detailed soil investigation and testing for the
complete knowledge of engineering properties of soil but a
classification system provides an idea about soil’s engineering
behaviour.
❖ Any such classification should be simple to use and should have limited
number of groups. Generally, we classify soils as cohesionless and
cohesive or coarse-grained and fine-grained.
❖ But these terms are too general and they certainly do not classify a soil
when it is a mixture of different soils grains in different proportions.
❖ Soil grain size has a great influence on the behaviour of soils. So most
soil classification methods use particle size as a basis to classify the
soils in groups.
Purpose
• Classifying soils into groups or sub-groups with similar engineering behavior.
• Classification systems were developed in terms of simple indices (GSD and
plasticity).
• These classifications can provide geotechnical engineers with general guidance
about engineering properties of the soils through the accumulated experience.
Communicate
between
engineers
Silt and
Boulders Cobbles Sand Clay
Gravel
214
For coarse-grained soils (gravel and sand), determine the percent passing the
#10, 40, and 200 Sieves
#10
#200
#40
216
Procedure for AASHTO Classification
➢ According to the AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Official) soil classification system, the soil is classified into 7 inorganic
groups, A -1 through A - 7, with 12 subgroups in all. It has an additional group A - 8
for peat or muck. Soils within each group are further assessed using the group index.
➢ For coarse-grained soils (gravel and sand), determine the percent passing the #10, 40,
and 200 sieves, and for fine grained soil (clay and Silt) , determine the liquid limit
and plasticity index.
➢ The group index, an empirical formula, is used to further evaluate soils within a group
(subgroups). Classification system is based on both particle size and the plasticity
characteristics.
Group Index (GI)=0.2a+0.005ac+0.01bd
where, a = that part of the percentage of soil particles passing the 75𝜇 greater
than 35 and not exceeding 75 expressed as a whole number (0-40)
b = that part of the percentage of soil particles passing the 75𝜇 greater
than 15 and not exceeding 55 expressed as a whole number (0-40)
c = that part of the liquid limit greater than 40 and not greater
than 60 expressed as a whole number (0-20)
d = that part of the plasticity index greater than 10 and not exceeding
30 expressed as a whole number (0-20)
If any term becomes negative, it is dropped. The GI should be rounded to the
nearest whole number. If the computed value is negative it is reported as zero. The
classification is carried out by proceeding from left to right in the chart of table
and selecting the first groups that fits the test data. A complete classification
includes the GI in parentheses. Thus, A-2-6(3) indicates a soil type A-2-6, having
a GI of 3.
In general, the greater the GI value the less desirable a soil is for highway
construction within that subgroup. A GI zero indicates a good material, while a GI of
20 or more indicates a very poor subgrade material.
In AASHTO System initially there was no place for organic soil so additional group
A-8 was introduced for peat or muck.
Silt and
Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Clay
D302
Coefficient of gradation C =
( D60 D10 )
c
187
D60
Coefficient of uniformity Cu =
D10
D302
Coefficient of gradation Cc =
( D60 D10 )
188
The soil components are assigned group symbols as indicated below:
Coarse grained soils: Gravel : G Fine grained soils: Silt : M
Sand : S Clay : C
Organic Soil : O
Major Division Group Typical Names
Symbols
Coarse Gravels 50% Clean Gravel with no GW Well-graded gravels and gravel-
Grained Soils or more of fines or little fines- sand mixture with little or no fines
more than coarse 200 no. Sieve <5%
GP Poorly-graded gravels and gravel-
50% retained fraction on 4
sand mixture with little or no fines
on 200 no. no. sieve.
sieve Gravel with fines- GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand -silt
200>12% mixture (poorly graded)
GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand – clay
mixture (poorly graded)
Sands more Clean Sand with SW Well-graded Sands and gravelly
than 50% fines-200 no. Sieve sands with no fines
fraction <5%
SP Poorly-graded Sands and gravelly
passes 4 no.
sands with no fines
sieve.
Sand with fines- SM Silty sand, sand -silt mixture
200>12% (poorly graded)
SC Clayey sand, sand-clay
mixture(poorly graded)
Used for Fine grained soils to determine whether silt (M) or clay (C)
60
C o m p a r i n g so i l s a t e q u a l l i q u i d l i mi t
50 To u g h n e s s a n d d r y s t r e n g t h i n c r e a s e
w i t h i n c r e a s i n g p l a st i c i t y i n d e x
40
CH
Plasticity
30
index
20 OH
CL or
10 CL OL
or MH
ML
0 ML
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
L i q u i d l i mi t
P l a st i c i t y c h a r t
The soil’s liquid limit (LL) after oven drying is less than 75 % of its
liquid limit before oven drying.” If the above statement is true, then the
first symbol is O.
e.g., SM e.g., CH
CoGr
CoGr - CoF
e.g., GP
e.g., GP-GC
210
4. Indian Standard Soil Classification System
(ISSCS)
ISSCS is the same as USCS with one modification the fine-grained soils are
subdivided into 3 subgroups of low, medium, and high compressibility, whereas,
in USCS, fine-grained soils are subdivided into 2 subgroups of low and high
compressibility. 4 major groups and their symbol are given below:
4. Peat (Pt)
Like USCS, coarse-grained soil is categorized based on grain size distribution in this
classification system, whereas fine-grained soil classification is based on plasticity.
According to ISSCS, the classification based on grain size distribution is as shown
below:
> 300 300 - 80 80 - 20 20- 4.75 4.75 - 2 2-0.425 0.425-0.075 0.002-0.075 < 0.002
Classification of Coarse-Grained Soil (Based on ISSCS)
According to the IS soil classification system, coarse-grained soil is graded
based on particle size, gradation characteristics (Cu and Cc), and percentage
fineness. The soil in which 50% or more soil particles are retained on a 75-
micron sieve (0.075 mm) is classified as coarse-grained soil. Coarse-
grained soils are further subdivided according to 3 cases which are
described below -
Case 1: % fineness < 5% by weight
The coarse-grained soils are classified as Gravel (G) if more than 50% of the coarse
fraction of the soil is retained on a 4.75 mm sieve; otherwise, it is classified as Sand (S).
They are further divided based on their gradation characteristics.
Gravel: Coarse fraction retained on 4.75 mm > 50%
1. GW ⇒ Well-graded gravel
Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3
2. GP ⇒ Poorly graded gravel
Cu < 4, or 1 > Cc, or Cc > 3