Une en Iso 18086 2022
Une en Iso 18086 2022
Asociación Española
de Normalización
Génova, 6 - 28004 Madrid
915 294 900
[email protected]
www.une.org
Corrosion des métaux et alliages. Détermination de la corrosion occasionnée par les courants
alternatifs. Critères de protection (ISO 18086:2019).
This standard is the official English version of EN ISO 18086:2020, which adopts
ISO 18086:2019.
This document may include additional national content clearly identified as such.
This standard was published as UNE-EN ISO 18086:2022, which is the definitive Spanish
version.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
© UNE 2022
Reproduction is prohibited without the express consent of UNE.
All intellectual property rights relating to this standard are owned by UNE.
English Version
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
© 2020 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 18086:2020 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword....................................................................................................................................................... 3
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
European foreword
The text of ISO 18086:2019 has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 156 "Corrosion of
metals and alloys” of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and has been taken over
as EN ISO 18086:2020 by Technical Committee CEN/TC 219 “Cathodic protection” the secretariat of
which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by June 2021, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by June 2021.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,
Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of
North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the
United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO 18086:2019 has been approved by CEN as EN ISO 18086:2020 without any
modification.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Contents Page
Foreword...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v
Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. vi
1 Scope.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
4 Cathodic protection persons competence................................................................................................................................... 5
5 Assessment of the AC influence.............................................................................................................................................................. 5
5.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
5.2 Assessment of the level of interference.............................................................................................................................. 6
6 Evaluation of the AC corrosion likelihood.................................................................................................................................. 6
6.1 Prerequisite................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
6.1.1 General...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
6.1.2 AC voltage on the structure..................................................................................................................................... 7
6.2 AC and DC current density............................................................................................................................................................. 7
6.2.1 General...................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
6.2.2 AC current density........................................................................................................................................................... 7
6.2.3 High cathodic DC current density...................................................................................................................... 7
6.2.4 Low cathodic DC current density....................................................................................................................... 8
6.2.5 Current ratio “Ia.c./Id.c.”................................................................................................................................................ 8
6.2.6 Soil resistivity...................................................................................................................................................................... 8
6.3 Corrosion rate........................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
6.4 Pipeline coatings.................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
6.5 Evaluation of the metal loss.......................................................................................................................................................... 9
7 Acceptable interference levels................................................................................................................................................................ 9
8 Measurement techniques............................................................................................................................................................................. 9
8.1 Measurements.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
8.1.1 General...................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
8.1.2 Selection of test sites..................................................................................................................................................... 9
8.1.3 Selection of measurement parameter......................................................................................................... 10
8.1.4 Sampling rate for the recording of interference levels................................................................. 10
8.1.5 Accuracy of measuring equipment................................................................................................................ 10
8.1.6 Installation of coupons or probes to calculate current densities........................................ 10
8.2 DC potential measurements...................................................................................................................................................... 10
8.3 AC voltage measurements........................................................................................................................................................... 11
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
10 Commissioning.....................................................................................................................................................................................................16
10.1 Commissioning..................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
10.2 Preliminary checking....................................................................................................................................................................... 16
10.2.1 General................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
10.2.2 Coupon AC voltage and current startup.................................................................................................... 17
10.2.3 Verification of effectiveness................................................................................................................................. 17
10.2.4 Installation and commissioning documents.......................................................................................... 17
11 Monitoring and maintenance................................................................................................................................................................18
Annex A (informative) Simplified description of the AC corrosion phenomenon...............................................19
Annex B (informative) Coupons and probes...............................................................................................................................................21
Annex C (informative) Coulometric oxidation..........................................................................................................................................26
Annex D (informative) Influence of soil characteristics on the AC corrosion process....................................27
Annex E (informative) Other criteria that have been used in the presence of AC influence.....................28
Annex F (informative) Parameters to take into account to choose a DC decoupling device.....................32
Annex G (informative) Method to determine the reference electrode location to remote earth........34
Annex H (informative) Simultaneous measurement on coupon current densities with high rate....36
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
iv Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www.iso.org/
iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 156, Corrosion of metal and alloys.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 18086:2015), of which it constitutes a
minor revision. The changes compared to the previous edition are as follows:
— references cited informatively (EN 13509 and EN 15257) have been moved from Clause 2 to the
Bibliography;
— in Clause 7, the two instances of the phrase “AC current density” have been changed to “AC average
current density”.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Introduction
This document has incorporated criteria and thresholds together with experience gained from the
most recent data. Various countries have a very different approach to the prevention of AC corrosion
depending primarily on the DC interference situation. These different approaches are taken into
account in two different ways:
— in the presence of “low” on-potentials, which allows a certain level of AC voltage (up to 15 V);
— in the presence of “high” on-potentials (with DC stray current interference on the pipeline for
instance), which requires the reduction of the AC voltage towards the lowest possible levels.
This document also gives some parameters to consider when evaluating the AC corrosion likelihood,
as well as detailed measurement techniques, mitigation measures, and measurements to carry out for
the commissioning of any AC corrosion mitigation system. Annex E proposes other parameters and
thresholds that require further validation based on practical experiences.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
vi Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 18086:2019(E)
1 Scope
This document specifies protection criteria for determining the AC corrosion risk of cathodically
protected pipelines.
It is applicable to buried cathodically protected pipelines that are influenced by AC traction systems
and/or AC power lines.
In the presence of AC interference, the protection criteria given in ISO 15589-1 are not sufficient to
demonstrate that the steel is being protected against corrosion.
This document provides limits, measurement procedures, mitigation measures, and information to
deal with long-term AC interference for AC voltages at frequencies between 16,7 Hz and 60 Hz and the
evaluation of AC corrosion likelihood.
This document deals with the possibility of AC corrosion of metallic pipelines due to AC interferences
caused by conductive, inductive or capacitive coupling with AC power systems and the maximum
tolerable limits of these interference effects. It takes into account the fact that this is a long-term effect,
which occurs during normal operating conditions of the AC power system.
This document does not cover the safety issues associated with AC voltages on pipelines. These are
covered in national standards and regulations (see, e.g., EN 50443).
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 8044, Corrosion of metals and alloys — Basic terms and definitions
ISO 15589-1, Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Cathodic protection of pipeline
systems — Part 1: On-land pipelines
IEC 61010-1, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and laboratory use —
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
3.1
AC electric traction system
AC railway electrical distribution network used to provide energy for rolling stock
Note 1 to entry: The system can comprise the following:
— running rails of non-electric railway systems, which are in the vicinity of and conductively connected to the
running rails of an electric railway system.
3.2
AC power supply system
AC electrical system devoted to electrical energy transmission, which includes overhead lines, cables,
substations and all apparatus associated with them
3.3
AC power system
AC electric traction system (3.1) or AC power supply system (3.2)
Note 1 to entry: Where it is necessary to differentiate, each interfering system (3.6) is clearly indicated with its
proper term.
3.4
copper/copper sulfate reference electrode
CSE
reference electrode consisting of copper in a saturated solution of copper sulfate
3.5
AC voltage
voltage measured to earth (3.9) between a metallic structure and a reference electrode
3.6
interfering system
general expression encompassing an interfering high voltage AC electric traction system (3.1) and/or
high voltage AC power supply system (3.2)
3.7
interfered system
system on which the interference (3.15) effects appear
Note 1 to entry: In this document, it is the pipeline system (3.8).
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
3.8
pipeline system
system of pipe network with all associated equipment and stations
Note 1 to entry: In this document, pipeline system refers only to metallic pipeline system.
Note 2 to entry: The associated equipment is the equipment electrically connected to the pipeline.
3.9
earth
conductive mass of the earth, of which the electric potential at any point is conventionally taken as
equal to zero
[SOURCE: IEC 60050-826]
2 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
3.10
operating condition
fault-free operation of any system
Note 1 to entry: Transients are not to be considered as an operating condition.
3.11
fault condition
non-intended condition caused by a short-circuit to earth (3.9), the fault duration being the normal
clearing time of the protection devices and switches
Note 1 to entry: A short circuit is an unintentional connection of an energized conductor to earth or to any
metallic part in contact with earth.
3.12
conductive coupling
coupling that occurs when a proportion of the current belonging to the interfering system (3.6) returns
to the system earth (3.9) via the interfered system (3.7) or when the voltage to the reference earth of the
ground in the vicinity of the influenced object rises because of a fault in the interfering system and the
results of which are conductive voltages and currents
3.13
inductive coupling
phenomenon whereby the magnetic field produced by a current carrying circuit influences another circuit
Note 1 to entry: Coupling is quantified by the mutual impedance of the two circuits. The results of which are
induced voltages and, hence, currents that depend on, for example, the distances, length, inducing current, circuit
arrangement and frequency.
3.14
capacitive coupling
phenomenon whereby the electric field produced by an energized conductor influences another
conductor
Note 1 to entry: Coupling is quantified by the capacitance between the conductors and the capacitances between
each conductor and the earth (3.9). The results of which are interference (3.15) voltages into conductive parts or
conductors insulated from earth. These voltages depend, for example, on the voltage of the influencing system,
distances and circuit arrangement.
3.15
interference
phenomenon resulting from conductive, inductive or capacitive coupling (3.12, 3.13, 3.14) between
systems, which can cause malfunction, dangerous voltages, damage (3.17), etc.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
3.16
disturbance
malfunction of a piece of equipment that loses its capability to work properly for the duration of the
interference (3.15)
Note 1 to entry: When the interference disappears, the interfered system (3.7) starts working properly again
without any external intervention.
3.17
damage
permanent reduction in the quality of service that can be suffered by the interfered system (3.7)
Note 1 to entry: A reduction in the quality of service could also be the complete cancellation of service.
EXAMPLE Coating perforation, pipe pitting, pipe perforation, permanent malfunction of the equipment
connected to the pipes.
3.18
danger
state of the influenced system that is able to produce a threat to human life
3.19
interference situation
maximum distance between the pipeline system (3.8) and AC power system for which an interference
(3.15) is to be considered
3.20
interference voltage
voltage caused on the interfered system (3.7) by the conductive, inductive or capacitive coupling (3.12,
3.13, 3.14) with the nearby interfering system (3.6) between a given point and the earth (3.9) or across
an insulating joint
3.21
IR drop
voltage due to any current, developed in an electrolyte such as the soil, between the reference electrode
and the metal of the structure, in accordance with Ohm’s Law (U = I × R)
3.22
IR-free potential
EIR-free
pipe to electrolyte potential measured without the voltage error caused by the IR drop (3.21) due to the
protection current or any other current
3.23
off-potential
Eoff
pipe to electrolyte potential measured after interruption of all sources of applied cathodic protection
current with the aim of approaching an IR-free potential (3.22)
Note 1 to entry: The delay before measurement varies according to circumstances.
3.24
on-potential
Eon
pipe to electrolyte potential measured while the cathodic protection system is continuously operating
3.25
spread resistance
ohmic resistance through a coating defect to earth (3.9) or from the exposed metallic surface of a
coupon (3.26) towards earth
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Note 1 to entry: This is the resistance which controls the AC or DC current through a coating defect or an exposed
metallic surface of a coupon for a given AC or DC voltage.
3.26
coupon
metal sample of defined dimensions made of a metal equivalent to the metal of the pipeline
3.27
probe
device incorporating a coupon (3.26) that provides measurements of parameters to assess the
effectiveness of cathodic protection and/or corrosion risk
4 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
5.1 General
This document is applicable to all metallic pipelines and all high voltage AC traction systems and high
voltage AC power supply systems and all major modifications that can significantly change the AC
interference effect.
The effects are the following:
— danger to people who come in direct contact or contact through conductive parts with the metallic
pipeline or the connected equipment;
— damage of the pipeline or to the connected equipment;
— disturbance of electrical/electronic equipment connected to the pipeline.
Electrical/electronic systems installed on a pipeline network shall be chosen such that they will neither
become dangerous nor interfere with normal operating conditions because of short-term voltages and
currents, which appear during short circuits on the AC power system.
Long-term AC interference on a buried pipeline can cause corrosion due to an exchange of AC current
between the exposed metal of the pipeline and the surrounding electrolyte.
This exchange of current depends on an AC voltage of which the amplitude is related to various
parameters such as the following:
— configuration of AC power line phase conductors;
— presence and configuration of the earthing conductor;
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
6.1 Prerequisite
6.1.1 General
The AC voltage on a pipeline is the driving force for the AC corrosion processes taking place on the steel
surface at coating defects. Among other things, corrosion damage depends on the AC current density,
level of DC polarization, defect geometry, local soil composition and resistivity (see Annex D).
Basically, there are three different approaches to prevent AC corrosion: to limit the AC current flowing
through a defect, to control the cathodic protection level, and to ensure that any coating remains defect
free. These approaches are not mutually exclusive.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
The evaluation of AC corrosion likelihood should be performed by the evaluation of some or all of the
following parameters:
— AC voltage on the structure;
— on-potential;
— IR-free potential;
— AC current density;
— DC current density;
— AC/DC current density ratio;
— soil resistivity;
— corrosion rate.
6 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
The acceptable AC voltage thresholds (see Clause 7 and Annex E) depend on the chosen strategy to
prevent AC corrosion. Hence, a given interference situation on the pipeline can influence the decision
regarding the applicable strategy.
6.2.1 General
The AC and DC current density on a coating defect controls both the cathodic protection level and
AC corrosion process. Therefore, it is a more reliable parameter for the evaluation of the AC corrosion
likelihood than the on-potential or the AC voltage. However, in contrast to the voltages present on
the pipeline, the current density cannot be readily determined. In principle, the current density can
be calculated from the spread resistance and the geometry of the coating defect and the AC voltage.
This calculation is generally not possible since the geometry of the coating fault and its surface area
are generally not known. Moreover, the application of cathodic protection can significantly change the
spread resistance and therefore, the current density at a given voltage.
The current density can only be estimated by means of coupons or probes. When evaluating the
AC corrosion likelihood by means of a coupon or probe, it is important to consider the limitations of
this technique. The calculation of the current density based upon the metallic coupon or probe surface
area and on the current measured on a coupon or probe, the current is averaged over the entire coupon
or probe surface. However, the current distribution on the coupon or probe can vary depending on its
geometry. Typically, current densities at the edges of the coupon or probe are larger than the current
averaged over the entire surface. Moreover, the often-observed formation of chalk layers can decrease
the effective coupon or probe surface area. Again, this effect results in an under estimation of the
current density.
The AC current density results in anodic and cathodic charge transfer. A detailed explanation of the
charge transfer process is given in Annex A. This current can be consumed in charging of the double
layer capacitance at the steel surface, in the oxidation of hydrogen (resulting in a decreasing pH), in the
oxidation of corrosion products, and in the oxidation of the metal. The oxidation of the metal results in
corrosion. Generally, an increasing AC current density results in a larger amount of metal oxidation and
higher corrosion rates. However, the anodic current is not the only current that can affect the corrosion
process. Cathodic current can reduce oxide layers formed and increase the pH on the metal surface.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
High AC current densities do not necessarily cause AC corrosion if the charge passed through the metal
surface can be consumed in reactions other than metal oxidation and oxide film reduction. This is
the case in the presence of low cathodic DC current densities. As a consequence, the judgment of the
AC corrosion likelihood based on the AC current density requires the additional consideration of the
cathodic DC current density.
Nevertheless, there is an empirically determined lower limit for the AC current density below which the
probability for AC corrosion is extremely low (see Clause 7).
A high DC current density results in more negative cathodic protection levels and the formation of a
high pH at the pipeline surface. However, the formation of a high pH-value, the decrease of the spread
resistance, and the increased reduction of surface oxide films can result in an acceleration of the
corrosion rate under simultaneous AC interference. Nevertheless, a sufficiently high DC current density
can prevent any anodic metal oxidation and therefore, the occurrence of AC corrosion.
A low DC current density results in a limited increase of the pH value at the metal surface, does not
significantly change the spread resistance, and has less reductive effect on metal oxides on the pipeline
surface. Therefore, the AC corrosion likelihood significantly decreases with decreasing DC current
densities. However, low DC current densities can result in an insufficient level of cathodic polarization
of the metal surface, as stated in ISO 15589-1.
Annexes A and E give detailed explanations about this process.
High DC current densities, depending on the AC current density, can result in both high and low
AC corrosion rates. Hence, the ratio of the two current densities may be used to assess the corrosion
likelihood. As long as the ratio is below a certain threshold (see Annex E), no AC corrosion can occur
since metal oxidation in the anodic half wave is prevented. The key advantage of using the ratio as an
indicator of corrosion likelihood is that the uncertainties regarding the condition of the metal surface
(e.g. formation of a chalk layer) are eliminated since the precise metal surface area is not required for
the calculation.
The AC corrosion process is controlled by the current density on a steel coating defect, which depends
on the voltage at the location and the spread resistance. The spread resistance is influenced by the soil
resistivity. The following soil resistivity parameters have been determined by experience in terms of
AC corrosion risk:
— below 25 Ω.m: very high risk;
— between 25 Ω.m and 100 Ω.m: high risk;
— between 100 Ω.m and 300 Ω.m: medium risk;
— above 300 Ω.m: low risk.
For further guidance on the effect of soil composition on AC corrosion risk, Annex D gives more detailed
information.
probe (see 8.4.3). This allows complex interference situations to be assessed on the basis of the actual
measured corrosion rate. The principles of the electrical resistance (ER) probe concept are described in
Annex B.
8 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
8 Measurement techniques
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
8.1 Measurements
8.1.1 General
This clause covers techniques related to the measurements of the parameters identified in Clause 5.
NOTE It is important that personnel are aware of the safety issues relating to measurements on pipelines
subjected to interference by AC systems (steady-state and fault condition).
Only instruments and cables with a sufficient isolation level as specified in IEC 61010-1 shall be used.
AC voltage should be measured at test posts during a general assessment and detailed and
comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of the cathodic protection (see ISO 15589-1). Additional
measurements shall be carried out during a representative period of time (see Clause 7) at sites where
the pipeline operator (or the responsible body acting in his/her place or on his/her behalf) suspects
that there might be a risk of AC corrosion. Such areas should include the following:
— areas where the soil resistivity is low (e.g. lower than 25 Ω.m);
— areas where casings are filled with substances with low resistivity properties (e.g. bentonite);
— areas with highest AC interference levels;
— areas where AC corrosion has previously taken place;
— areas where local DC polarization conditions can favour AC corrosion, such as areas with cathodic DC
stray current interference or areas where high levels of cathodic protection are present (see 6.2.3);
— areas where internal inspection tools have detected external metal loss.
At a later stage, the test sites can be restricted to particular positions where the initial analysis has
indicated a sustained likelihood of AC corrosion.
The measurements to be carried out should take into account the parameters described in Clause 6 and
be in accordance with Clause 7.
The measurement sampling rate shall be consistent with the type of interference. High voltage power
system interference can typically require a sampling rate in the order of minutes, whereas AC or DC
railway interference can require a sampling rate in the order of seconds.
The instruments used for measuring any voltages (AC or DC) shall be suitable.
NOTE Conditions are set out in EN 13509.
The accuracy of the measuring equipment is only one amongst several factors contributing to the
uncertainty of the measurement.
In order to calculate current densities (see Clause 7), the use of coupons or probes is necessary (see 8.4).
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
10 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
d) In general (regardless of the measurement technique), the IR-free potential is shifted to a more
positive value and the DC current density is increased by the superimposed AC voltage. This
reflects the effect of the AC voltage on the DC polarization.
The above effects are generally more significant factors than the accuracy of the voltmeter itself
regarding the uncertainty of the measurement.
NOTE Additional interference sources causing IR drops, as well as possible measuring techniques, are given
in EN 13509:2013, Table 1.
Coupons or probes should be installed so that they are representative of the pipeline conditions. The
following points should be considered.
— The coupon or probe should be installed in the same soil or backfill as the pipeline itself.
— The coupon or probe geometry (size, shape, coating thickness, angle between coating and simulated
coating defect) influences the spread resistance and should be taken into consideration. The
measurements with respect to the criteria defined in Clause 7 have to be carried out on a 1 cm2
coupon surface area.
— The coupon or probe should not cause or receive any electrical interference from adjacent coupons
or coating faults on the pipeline, unless this is part of the purpose of monitoring.
— The coupon or probe should have and maintain effective electrical contact with the surrounding
soil, unless lack of contact is part of the purpose of monitoring. During the installation process,
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
the soil around the coupon or probe should be compacted to prevent settlement and voids forming
around the coupon or probe. These voids could result in loss of full contact between the coupon or
probe surface and the surrounding soil.
Coupons or probes can be installed by a number of different methods, such as:
— during construction of the structure under investigation;
— during excavation activities for investigation of the structure;
— by augering (see Annex B).
The installation method selected depends on site access, the type of soil to be excavated, the cost
involved and the availability of an electrical connection to the structure.
Coupon or probe currents (AC or DC) can be measured by the voltage drop across a series resistor
(see Figure 1). For both AC and DC current measurements, the value of the series resistor should be
sufficiently low to avoid significant disturbance of the system. For field measurements, this is typically
in the range of 10 Ω for a 1 cm2 coupon or probe.
Key
1 pipe
2 backfill
3 native soil
4 coupon or probe
5 series resistor or internal shunt resistor of ammeter
6 voltmeter
Figure 1 — Coupon or probe test post with series resistor for current measurements
One connection between the coupon or probe and the pipe is essential to ensure cathodic protection and
the ability to take cathodic protection measurements, while a second connection makes measurements
easier, more reliable and eliminates the effect of voltage loss in the current carrying conductor.
Various types of corrosion rate measurements have been described in the annexes of this document.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
The following three general types of corrosion rate measurements can be applied:
— weight loss measurements;
— perforation measurements;
— ER measurements.
Weight loss measurements require the installation of pre-weighed coupons. After some time of operation
(months to years), the coupon is excavated. If it is brought to a laboratory for cleaning, inspection and
weighing, this should be carried out in accordance with the procedure described in ISO 8407. The
primary advantage of the procedure is that the visual inspection provides detailed information of the
corrosion topography, maximum, as well as the average corrosion rate. The primary disadvantage is
that the coupon provides no information until it is excavated.
Perforation measurements are made on special perforation probes (see Annex B). A signal is generated
when the corrosion process has perforated the wall thickness of the coupon. The primary advantage is
12 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
that the maximum (localized) corrosion depth is registered without having to excavate the probe. The
primary disadvantage is that this information is not available until the coupon is perforated.
ER measurements require the installation of ER probes (see Annex B). Corrosion is detected by the
increase of the ER of the coupon when corrosion progressively decreases the thickness of the coupon.
The primary advantage of this technique is that the average corrosion rate can be followed continuously
and used to optimize cathodic protection levels. The primary disadvantage is that the localized
corrosion rate is detected with less accuracy until the probe is perforated.
AC corrosion processes have also indirectly been identified by the coulometric oxidation of corrosion
products (see Annex C).
9 Mitigation measures
9.1 General
AC corrosion can be mitigated by using construction and operation measures. The following subclauses
describe measures that can be used individually or in combined application.
As specific bedding material condition can affect the AC corrosion likelihood, the soil condition is of
special importance.
This mitigation measure can be implemented at the stage of pipeline installation by bedding it in sand.
Nevertheless, a full embedding status of the pipeline cannot be ensured during operation as the sand
could be drained, eluted or mixed with other soil strata, which decreases the effect of the original
protection method.
The AC voltage on a pipeline can be reduced by installing isolating joints at suitable positions in the
pipeline thus, electrically interrupting the longitudinal current path along the pipeline. The effect of
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
The isolating joint locations can be determined during design using simulating models
(see Reference [8]).
This method can be beneficial where there are extensive parallel routings or high soil resistivities
(e.g. greater than 500 Ω.m). In the case of high soil resistivity, the dimensions of the earthing system to
mitigate the induced AC interference can be significant.
The position of isolating joints should take into account the continuity/discontinuity of AC and/or DC
current distribution along the pipeline.
Interference can also be modified by the installation of an insulated wire in close proximity but not
connected to the pipeline and between powerline and pipeline. The insulated wire is also earthed at
each extremity. This method should not be used as it is considered to be a more effective measure to
prevent short-term interference rather than a method to reduce long-term interference.
In any event, bare wires shall not be used because they can have an adverse effect on coating defect
surveys in the case of a coating defect on the pipeline.
The AC interference situation on a pipeline mainly depends on the proximity and parallel routing
between a pipeline and high voltage power lines. A mitigating effect on the AC voltage status can be
achieved by increasing the distances between the pipeline and powerline routes.
This requirement often contradicts with the general obligation of joint common “energy corridors” to
minimize environmental impacts.
The geometric arrangement of phase conductors or an earthing wire on power line towers will have an
effect on the magnitude of the induced voltage on the pipeline and needs to be considered during power
line or pipeline construction.
9.3.1 Earthing
9.3.1.1 General
Mitigating the interference situation by installing earthing systems is a most commonly used method.
Usually, horizontally installed or vertically installed earthing systems are used. The decision on which
system to use depends on the local soil resistivities and the local access conditions. The earthing
system should have sufficiently low enough impedance to achieve the required AC corrosion protection
criteria for induced voltage. Typically, the impedance will need to be less than 10 Ω, although typical
configurations require significantly lower values of impedance.
Direct connection of earthing systems to the pipeline is not recommended, particularly if the earthing
system is made of copper but also zinc or magnesium. The following are the disadvantages of direct
connection.
— An increased demand on the cathodic protection system has to be considered in addition to the
protective pipeline cathodic protection current demand.
— The off-potential measurement readings can be misleading.
— Cathodic protection effectiveness can be compromised. If this is the case, particular attention
should be paid to detrimental galvanic cells (e.g. an earthing system made of copper connected to
the pipeline system).
— When magnesium electrodes are used to discharge AC, they might have a short life.
— There is a tendency for zinc or galvanised steel wires in soil used as earthing system to become
more anodic with time. Thus, the earthing system can consume more cathodic protection current
with time, which will be detrimental to the pipeline corrosion protection system.
14 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
— Due to the application of cathodic protection current, direct earthing system might be covered
by a calcareous layer, which can have, with time, an adverse effect on its effectiveness to mitigate
AC corrosion.
To avoid disadvantages due to direct bonding, earthing systems are commonly not directly bonded to
the pipeline but connected via decoupling devices, which provide an electrical path for the AC current
from the pipeline to earth while simultaneously blocking DC current.
The DC decoupling devices should not interfere with the normal cathodic protection system operation
as well as the monitoring of the cathodic protection effectiveness and the touch voltage protection on
the pipeline.
The DC leakage current for the selected decoupling devices should be taken into consideration when
determining the cathodic protection current demand for the pipeline to be cathodically protected.
The most common device used for this is an electrolytic capacitor. It can be equipped with other
electronic devices (in parallel or in series) for safety reasons, for protecting it from surge current and
for specific applications.
Annex F gives information to assist in the selection of the correct device to install.
If it is not possible to achieve a low resistance earth or if the AC voltage is not sufficiently lowered, the
decoupling device can be replaced by an AC compensation device.
This device compensates the AC voltage by imposing a counter phase AC current on the pipeline and,
thereby, generating an artificially zero resistance earth.
Adjustment of the cathodic protection level is a method that can be used to mitigate the AC corrosion
risk on pipeline by meeting the criteria defined in Clause 7. The adjustment can consist of either of the
following:
— controlling the cathodic protection level towards a more negative level to meet the criterion defined
in Clause 7 ( Ja.c./Jd.c. < 5);
— controlling the cathodic protection level towards less negative level to meet the criterion defined in
Clause 7 ( Jd.c. < 1 A/m2).
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
The AC corrosion likelihood exists on interfered pipelines especially for small sized coating defects in
low resistivity soils (e.g. lower than 25 Ω.m). Those sections with coating defects can be surveyed with
suitable measurement techniques as described in EN 13509.
In order to obtain sufficient resolution, the measurement setup should be optimized (increased voltage
used for detection and increased resolution of the voltmeter) according to the conditions of the pipeline
(depth, severity of coating defect).
If an unacceptable AC corrosion risk exists on a section of a pipeline despite all the mitigation measures,
all coating defects should be excavated and repaired. This is only economically feasible for well-coated
pipelines.
This method should be combined by measurements on the pipeline to evaluate the AC corrosion risk.
10 Commissioning
10.1 Commissioning
Although AC mitigation systems are not cathodic protection systems, they should be generally
commissioned in the same manner as cathodic protection systems as detailed in ISO 15589-1.
It is possible that there will be AC voltages at test facilities and exposed sections of pipeline and, while
these might not be a hazard in themselves, they could cause an involuntary reaction that could be
hazardous. Safety precautions shall be taken if there is any risk of unacceptable levels of touch potential
(see, e.g., EN 50443).
10.2.1 General
16 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
— if suitable probes and coupons have been installed, then the following additional measurements
can be made:
— corrosion rate;
— coupon on- and off-potential and current.
The startup should be carried out accordingly as below, unless the requirements given in EN 50443 are
exceeded with mitigation devices disconnected.
— Carry out the data logging and measurement procedures during the installation and commissioning
checks before commencing any startup procedures.
— Check touch potentials by measurement. If there are unacceptable levels of touch potential, then
suitable precautions shall be taken (see EN 50443).
Connect the mitigation device to the earthing system via the pre-arranged connection, then connect the
other terminal of the mitigation device to the pipeline. Repeat this procedure for all mitigation devices.
The effectiveness of the mitigation system can be demonstrated by showing that criteria defined in
Clause 7 are achieved. The same measurements as those conducted during commissioning can also be
made (see 10.2.2).
Measurements should be performed on pipelines or sections of them where unacceptable AC influence
is suspected or can be expected based on map observation, calculation or routine measurements.
These measurements should be performed, in the first instance, at all test points, cathodic protection
stations, insulating joints and casings, and wherever an accessible measurement cable is connected to
the pipeline or section.
A coupon or probe could be used at the areas identified as being at a high risk of AC corrosion to
determine the current density and/or the corrosion rate (see 8.4).
Additionally, the effectiveness of the mitigation system can also be determined by a reduction in
corrosion rate, since this accurately represents the total effectiveness of the applied cathodic protection
system as well as the AC mitigation system.
After the completion of the commissioning checks, a file of documents shall be prepared. The following
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
18 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Annex A
(informative)
AC and DC current densities, larger charges passed during the anodic and cathodic half wave, changes
in the solubility of oxidation products of iron and their oxidation state.
A very simplified description of the process taking place during AC corrosion is shown in Figure A.1.
During the anodic half wave, the bare metal surface is oxidized resulting in the formation of an oxide
film. This is due to the current that leaves the metal surface. During the negative half wave, when
the current enters the metal surface, this oxide film is reduced and, therefore, converted into a non-
protective rust layer. In the following anodic cycle, a new oxide film grows. Upon reduction of the
oxide film, the amount of rust is increased. If this process results in the formation and dissolution of a
single oxide layer during every anodic half wave, corrosion rates in the range of 100 mm/year would be
obtained. Since such high corrosion rates were only achieved under extreme laboratory conditions, it
can be concluded that the formation and/or reduction of the oxide film is, in most cases, only partially
taking place.
Key
1 AC current present on a coating defect
2 metal
3 passive film (e.g. Fe3O4)
4 iron hydroxide [e.g. Fe(OH)2]
X time
Y current
corrosion. This has to be taken into account in the discussion of threshold values since there are two
fundamentally different concepts of prevention of AC corrosion. The concept allows the explanation
of the relevance of the various thresholds, such as the existence of a critical ratio between AC and DC
current density and of a critical AC current density.
20 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Annex B
(informative)
This subclause gives a typical procedure for the installation of coupons or probes by an augering
technique.
Key
1 pipe
2 backfill
3 native soil
4 augered hole
5 test post
If desired for a characterization of the soil type, it is advisable to use some of the excavated soil to
perform soil resistivity testing in a soil box, to determine the soil moisture content, to conduct an
acid droplet test for the presence of calcium carbonate or to obtain a sample for further analysis. The
detailed soil analysis can be conducted in a laboratory.
If the soil is harder, it might be necessary to sample an amount of soil from the desired coupon or probe
depth and form a “cake” around the artificial coating defect of the coupon or probe, mixed with a small
quantity of distilled water prior to positioning in the soil.
Fill back the soil in the drilled hole in the same manner as it was uncovered and compact each small
amount of backfill. Arrange the coupon or probe test leads in the test post (see Figure B.2). Preferably,
the coupon or probe should be equipped with a double-wired connection. One connection between
the coupon or probe and the pipe is essential to carry out measurements. A second connection makes
measurements easier and more reliable.
22 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Key
1 pipe
2 backfill
3 native soil
4 coupon or probe
5 test post with switch (normally closed)
Figure B.2 — Coupon or probe positioned next to the pipeline and connected through a test post
The ER probe technique can be applied for corrosion rate assessment as an alternative to the weight
loss coupon. Unlike the weight loss coupon, the ER probe technique does not require excavation and
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Key
1 reference element, Rr
2 coupon element, Rc
3 voltage across the reference element, VR
4 voltage across the coupon element, VC
5 excitation current, Iexc
Figure B.3 — Principle of ER probe with excitation current and voltage measurements
Since a high level of AC current can pass through the coupon element, local heating of the coupon
element compared with the reference element could be expected. For this reason, ER probes should
be disconnected from the pipeline and left in an open circuit condition for a short period of time until
thermal equilibrium is reached before the ER measurement is made. This will ensure the best possible
assessment of the element thickness.
in the ER probe corrosion rates due to changes in the electrical condition. In this manner, by carefully
analysing the electrical parameters causing such spikes, the threshold values for corrosion can be
deduced and built into the record kept for a particular location, based on the threshold corrosion rate
and the threshold protection potentials defined in ISO 15589-1.
The above concept is also applicable for other types of corrosion (e.g. corrosion caused by DC stray
current) and makes it a versatile tool.
24 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
insulator separating the internal electrode and the steel plate. When corrosion perforates this steel
plate, humidity will penetrate into the gas-tight coupon and form a conductive electrolyte between
the electrode and the thin steel plate. By a simple resistance measurement between the electrode
and the thin plate, the perforation of the coupon can be detected by means of conventional resistance
measurement devices. As a consequence, the monitoring of the perforation probe can be readily
integrated into a conventional inspection routine or monitored over time. The key advantage is the
simple handling and especially the information about the corrosion depth. Hence, information about
the depth of the corrosion is provided independent on corroding surface. This is especially important in
cases of very local corrosion that penetrates rapidly but with little mass loss.
The main application purpose is to ensure that the threshold values for the current density are met.
Since these current values are averaged over the entire probe surface, the actual local current density
can be underestimated in the case of the formation of chalk layers on the probe surface. Therefore, the
perforation probes provide an additional safety level by giving an alarm value. It is the only coupon that
provides information on corrosion depth even in the case of very local corrosion attack.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Annex C
(informative)
Coulometric oxidation
The cathodic protection current results in an increased pH value and in an electrochemical reduction
of some of the corrosion products formed on the steel surface from Fe3+ to Fe2+. The overall content of
iron ions accumulated due to corrosion can be estimated by electrochemical oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ in
the corrosion products. As a consequence, the amount of charge required for oxidation is proportional
to the amount of the corrosion product formed over time. The coulometric oxidation can be performed
with all types of coupons or probes installed in the field and connected to a cathodically protected
pipeline.
By isolating the coupon or probe from the pipeline, a constant anodic current can be applied and the
resulting potential can be recorded. The ohmic potential drop can be numerically corrected or the
off-potential can be determined by periodically interrupting the current flow. The amount of charge
required to polarize the coupon or probe to 0 V against the CSE is used for estimating the mass loss
on the coupon or probe. By multiplying the charge in Coulombs with 0,013, the mass loss in grams
is obtained. The advantage of the technique is the possibility of determining the extent of corrosion
that occurred in the past. Moreover, the further increase in corrosion can be determined by means of
repeated coulometric oxidation. The results of the measurements are only reliable if all the corrosion
products are electrochemically accessible and if the cathodic protection current is sufficiently high to
reduce the corrosion products.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
26 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Annex D
(informative)
While the earth alkaline ions generally increase pore resistance, the alkaline cations Na+, K+ and
Li+ result in the formation of highly soluble hygroscopic hydroxides. As a consequence, a low spread
resistance due to the attracted water and high ion concentration is observed. This process can decrease
the pore resistance of the metal at a coating fault by up to a factor of 60.
The current density on the metal at a coating fault of a given geometry is, therefore, dependent on the
electrical conductivity and the ratio of alkali and earth alkali ions. Moreover, the cathodic current
density influences the amount of hydroxide produced and affects, therefore, the local conductivity.
Annex E
(informative)
E.1 General
The criteria presented in this annex, though not widely used, have been successfully applied by some
operators. They have defined them either by field and/or laboratory experiments. They are included in
this annex for the sake of completeness.
AC values are rms ones. Current densities are measured on a 1 cm2 circular coupon or probe.
28 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
E.2.4 Criteria
The criteria as defined in ISO 15589-1 should be respected.
Theoretical and practical experiences have shown that the following two methods can be used to solve
AC influence problems against steel corrosion.
— First scenario: “more negative” cathodic protection level. In this case, one of the three parameters
below, in order of priority, can be applied:
Ua.c.
— the following formula should be satisfied: <3;
Eon − 1,2
NOTE −1,2 V against the CSE is the limiting critical potential (see ISO 15589-1). Choosing a more
positive value would create a less conservative result in the calculated ratio for given Ua.c. and Eon
values.
Key
1 less negative cathodic protection level
2 more negative cathodic protection level
3 AC corrosion
x DC current density (A/m2)
y AC current density (A/m2)
Figure E.1 — Relationship between AC and DC current densities and likelihood of AC corrosion
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
30 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Key
1 less negative cathodic protection level
2 more negative cathodic protection level
3 AC corrosion
x Eon (V against the CSE)
y Ua.c. (V)
NOTE Axis limits for x are given for information. In practice, it is possible to have higher axis ranges.
Annex F
(informative)
This annex provides information to help select the most suitable AC mitigation system to install.
General aspects to be taken into account are:
— AC voltage mitigation effectiveness and respective AC corrosion risk mitigation methods;
— resistance to earth of AC mitigation electrode;
— influence on cathodic protection operation and monitoring;
— existence of AC voltage/current activation threshold;
— ability to withstand and/or conduct surges and lightning overvoltages;
— size of the device;
— maintenance.
The electrical parameters are:
— capacitance;
— activation AC voltage level;
— activation AC current level;
— deactivation AC voltage level;
— deactivation AC current level;
— DC leakage versus DC voltage or cathodic protection potential of the pipeline;
— DC leakage ratio to total cathodic protection current consumption of the pipeline;
— max. continuous AC current;
— steady-state AC current vs. AC voltage;
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
32 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
Annex G
(informative)
The applicable position of remote earth may be assessed using the arrangement shown in Figure G.1.
This is particularly important when measuring nearby earth electrodes.
Key
1, 2, 3 reference electrode locations
4 pipe
5 soil
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
6 gradient
7 potential
Reference electrode (1) represents the IR-free condition and is not applicable for AC voltage
measurements since (with reference to remote earth) the entire IR drop should be included.
Instead, the following procedure can be useful.
a) Place a reference electrode (2) on top of the soil above the pipeline. Connect a (first) voltmeter to
the pipeline and this reference electrode and read the AC voltage.
b) Place an additional reference electrode (3) on top of the soil above the pipeline. Connect a second
voltmeter between reference electrodes (2) and (3) and read the AC voltage difference between the
two reference electrodes.
34 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
c) Change the position of reference electrode (3) 1 m to 5 m transverse to the pipeline and read the AC
voltage on the voltmeters.
d) Put reference electrode (2) to the former position of reference electrode (3) and read the AC voltage
on the voltmeters.
e) Remote earth is reached when repeating steps c) and d) continuously does not change the AC voltage
value of the reading of the second voltmeter, which should be close to zero.
f) Finally, place electrode (2) where electrode (3) indicated the remote earth position, connect the
voltmeter with electrode (2) and read the AC voltage with electrode (2).
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Annex H
(informative)
Figure H.1 shows the measuring systems for the coupon currents and on-potentials[7]. Coupon current
is the current that flows between the coupon and the pipe while the cathodic protection system is
continuously operating. Positive values in the coupon current indicate the current flowing through the
electrolyte to the coupon (i.e. cathodic current flowing).
Key
1 pipeline
2 coating
3 soil
4 coupon
5 reference electrode
6 shunt
7 switch (normally closed)
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
8 voltmeter
Figure H.1 — Measuring systems for the coupon current densities and on-potentials
In areas where the frequency of the electric power transmission lines is 50 Hz and the AC powered rail
transit system is operated at a frequency of 50 Hz, the measurement of coupon current densities should
be carried out over a period of at least 24 h to assess the level of permanent or short-term interference
on a pipeline as follows.
The data on coupon current densities and on-potentials are continuously measured with a resolution
of 16 bits at intervals of 0,1 ms in each monitoring station. In areas where AC and/or DC interference
currents induced by the passing of an AC or DC train are suspected, this measuring technique with
a high data sampling rate of 0,1 ms enables an assessment of the corrosion risk. Coupon DC current
density, Id.c., coupon AC current density, Ia.c., and coupon on-potential, Eon, are obtained for a single
period of 50 Hz (i.e. every subunit of 20 ms) from Formulae (H.1), (H.2) and (H.3), respectively, using
36 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
ISO 18086:2019(E)
a low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of 73 Hz to avoid abnormal electrical spikes and harmonic
currents.
200
∑
1 1
Id.c. = · I(n) (H.1)
A 200 n=1
200
∑
1 1
Ia.c. = · { I ( n ) − A·Id.c. }2 (H.2)
A 200 n=1
200
∑
1
Eon = E (n) (H.3)
200 n=1 on
where
n is 1, 2, …, 199, 200;
Id.c. is the coupon DC current density for a single period of 50 Hz (i.e. each subunit);
Ia.c. is the coupon AC current density for a single period of 50 Hz (i.e. each subunit);
Eon is the coupon on-potential for a single period of 50 Hz (i.e. each subunit).
Formula (H.2) suggests that the frequency of coupon AC current densities can be regarded as 50 Hz or
less. The higher the data sampling rate, the higher the accuracy of obtained Id.c., Ia.c. and Eon. By taking
into consideration the transference rate of measured data from a developed instrument[7] to a client PC
and consumption of battery for measurement, a data sampling interval of 0,1 ms was determined.
Each unit containing 500 subunits is set to 10 s. The average, maximum and minimum values of Id.c., Ia.c.
and Eon are obtained every unit by analysing the data of 500 subunits.
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
Bibliography
[1] IEC 60050-826, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary — Part 826: Electrical installations
[2] EN 13509, Cathodic protection measurement techniques
[3] EN 15257, Cathodic protection — Competence levels and certification of cathodic protection
personnel
[4] Büchler M., Voûte C.-H., Joos D. Feldversuche zur Wechselstromkorrosion. DVGW — energie/
wasser-praxis July/August 2010, 30
[5] Büchler M., Voûte C.-H., Joos D. Field investigation of AC corrosion. CEOCOR International
Congress 2011 Menthon-Saint-Bernard CEOCOR, c/o SYNERGRID. Brussels, Belgium, 2011
[6] Büchler M. Alternating current corrosion of cathodically protected pipelines: Discussion of
the involved processes and their consequences on the critical interference values. Materials and
Corrosion. 2012, 63, pp. 1181
[7] Kajiyama F., Nakamura Y. Development of an advanced instrumentation for assessing the ac
corrosion risk of buried pipelines. NACE Corrosion, 2010
[8] CIGRE Technical Brochure N°95. In: Guide on the Influence of High Voltage AC Power Systems on
Metallic Pipelines, 1995
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
38 Este documento ha sido adquirido por TÉCNICAS REUNIDAS el 2022-10-31. © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved
Para poder utilizarlo en un sistema de red interno, deberá disponer de la correspondiente licencia de AENOR
For information regarding the development of standards contact:
Asociación Española de Normalización
Génova, 6
28004 MADRID-España
Tel.: 915 294 900
Asociación Española de Normalización, UNE
[email protected]
www.une.org