A Dielectric Resonator-Based Route To Left-Handed
A Dielectric Resonator-Based Route To Left-Handed
net/publication/245553788
CITATIONS READS
14 352
8 authors, including:
Zhuo Xu
Xi'an Jiaotong University
596 PUBLICATIONS 14,381 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jiafu Wang on 13 December 2013.
Z. Xu
Electronic Materials Research Laboratory
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education
Xi’an Jiaotong University
Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
M. Hao
Northwest University
Xi’an, Shaanxi 710127, China
1. INTRODUCTION
2. DESIGN
z
x
r=4.5mm
y
h=4mm
are w = 1.0 mm and R = 2.5 mm. Figure 4(b) shows the magnetic
metamaterial using the negative-permeability unit cell. The distance
between each two unit cells is a = 10 mm.
By numerical simulations, we investigated a layer of magnetic
Metallic
Strip
Electric
Field
Dielectricc Resonator
Reson
(a) (b)
E
a =10mm
R=2.5mm
w=1.0mm
k
H
(a) (b)
0
100
-10
Permeability ( µ )
50
S Paramete rs /dB
-20
0
-30
S11 -50
-40
S21 — Re (µ),-- Im( µ)
-50 -100
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5 5
Frequency/GHz Frequencyy /GHz
(a) (b)
the two metallic strips intersect with each other at the center of the
circle. In this way, the electric fields under HEM11δ mode are enclosed
by the rectangular metallic rings, as shown in Figure 6(b). Thus,
magnetic resonance in HEM11δ mode is suppressed while only the
electric resonance in HEM11δ mode is maintained and tuned down.
Based on the above analysis, the negative-permittivity unit cell
based on disk-like DRs is designed. Figure 7(a) shows the negative-
permittivity unit cell. Two identical perpendicular rectangular copper
rings are etched on surface of the DR. The width of the copper rings
is w = 1.0 mm. Figure 7(b) shows the electric metamaterial using the
negative-permittivity unit cell. The distance between each two unit
cells is a = 10 mm.
By numerical simulations, we investigated a layer of electric
metamaterial which is one-unit-cell thick in the propagation direction
and infinite in two other directions. Polarizations of incident waves
are shown in Figure 7(b). Incident plane waves are incident normally
onto the electric metamaterial along z direction. The simulated
transmission spectrum is shown in Figure 8(a). As shown in
Figure 8(a), there is a stop-band around 4.2 GHz, which indicates an
electric resonance. The retrieved effective permittivity is shown in
Figure 8(b). In Figure 8(b), there is an obvious electric resonance.
In the frequency range 4.12 ∼ 4.26 GHz, real part of the effective
permittivity is negative.
Metallic Strips
(a) (b)
a=10mm
w=1.0mm
E
H
(a) (b)
0 200
-5
Pe rm ittivity ( ε )
S Para me te rs /dB
-10
100
-15
0
-20
-25 -100
S11
-30 — Re (ε),-- Im(ε)
S21
-35 -200
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5 5
Frequency/GHz Freq uency/ GHz
(a) (b)
-10
S Paramete rs /dB
a=10mm
E -20
-30
-40 S11
k S21
-50
H 3.5 4 4.5 5
Frequency/GHz
(a) (b)
shows that in the frequency range 4.19 ∼ 4.28 GHz, the real part of
effective refraction index is negative. The frequency range 4.19 ∼
4.28 GHz is just the left-handed band we are trying to obtain.
50 20
Permeability ( µ)
25
Permittivity (ε )
0
0
-20
-25
— Re (µ),-- Im( µ) — Re (ε),-- Im( ε)
-50 -40
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4 .5 5
uency
Frequency/GHz Frequency/GHz
(a) (b)
4 0
Refraction Index (n)
2 10
Impe dance (Z)
0 0
-2 -10
—Re( Z),--Im( Z) — Re (n), -- Im(n)
-4 -20
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4 .5 5
Frequency/GHz
y Frequency/GHz
y
(c) (d)
projection of k onto the surface plane and the metallic cross bar along
x direction of the unit cell, as shown in Figure 11.
z
k
θ
ϕ
x y
50 20
ϕ =0°
40 ϕ =15° 10
ϕ =30°
Permeability (µ )
30 ϕ =45° Pe rmittivity (ε ) 0
20 -10
10 -20 ϕ =0°
ϕ =15°
0 -30 ϕ =30°
ϕ =45°
-10 -40
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5 5
Fr equency/GHz
y/G Fr equency/GHz
u y/G
(a) (b)
20
ϕ =0°
ϕ =15°
Re fract ion Inde x (n )
10 ϕ =30°
ϕ =45°
-10
-20
3.5 4 4.5 5
Fr equency/GHz
G
(c)
Figure 12. Retrieved real parts of constitutive parameters under
different polarization angles ϕ = 0◦ , 15◦ , 30◦ and 45◦ . (a) Real parts
of effective permeability; (b) real parts of effective permittivity; (c)
real parts of effective refraction index.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 13, 2009 145
50 40
θ =0°
㩜
40 θ =15° 20 㩜 㩜 㩜
㩜 㩜
θ =30°
Pe rme abilit y (µ )
Permitti vity (ε )
30 θ =45° 0
㩜 θ =60°
20 -20 㩜
θ =0°
10 -40 θ =15°
㩜 㩜 θ =30°
㩜 㩜 㩜 㩜 㩜 㩜
0 㩜 -60 θ =45°
㩜 θ =60°
-10 -80
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5 5
Frequency/GHz
y/ Fr equency/GHz
y/
(a) (b)
20
Refraction Index (n )
10 㩜
㩜 㩜
㩜
㩜 㩜
0 㩜
θ =0°
θ =15°
-10 θ =30°
θ =45°
㩜 θ =60°
-20
3.5 4 4.5 5
Fre quency/GHz
y/G
(c)
Figure 13. Retrieved real parts of constitutive parameters under
different obliquely incident TE plane waves with incidence angles θ =
0◦ , 15◦ , 30◦ , 45◦ and 60◦ . (a) Real parts of effective permeability; (b)
real parts of effective permittivity; (c) real parts of effective refraction
index.
146 Wang et al.
in Figures 13(a) and (b), the magnetic resonance becomes a bit weaker
while the electric resonance becomes a bit stronger as the incidence
angle increases. Since the effective refraction index is the square root of
the product of the effective permeability and permeability, the negative
index range keeps almost the same under different incidence angles,
as shown in Figure 13(c). Moreover, for there is a minor red-shift of
the negative-permeability range with the incidence angle, the negative-
index range shifts slightly downwards as the incidence angles increases.
But the shift is so minor that it can be neglected, so it is reasonable to
conclude that left-handed properties of the DR-based planar LHM are
approximately the same in the wide incidence angle range 0 < θ < 60
under obliquely incident TE plane waves.
10 0 20
㩜 θ =0°
80 θ =15° 10
θ =30° 㩜 㩜 㩜 㩜 㩜
㩜 㩜
Permeability ( µ )
Permittivity (ε )
60 θ =45° 0 㩜
㩜 㩜
㩜 θ =60°
40 -10
θ =0°
20 㩜
-20 θ =15°
㩜
㩜 㩜 㩜 θ =30°
0 㩜 㩜 㩜 -30 θ =45°
㩜 㩜 θ =60°
-20 -40
3.5 4 4.5 5 3.5 4 4.5 5
Fr equency/GHz
y/G y/G
Fr equency/GHz
(a) (b)
20
Refraction Index (n )
10 㩜
㩜
㩜 㩜
㩜 㩜
0 㩜 㩜 㩜
θ =0°
㩜
θ =15°
-10 θ =30°
θ =45°
㩜 θ =60°
-20
3.5 4 4.5 5
Fr equency/GHz
ue
(c)
Figure 14. Retrieved real parts of constitutive parameters under
different obliquely incident TM plane waves with incidence angles
θ = 0◦ , 15◦ , 30◦ , 45◦ and 60◦ . (a) Real parts of effective permeability;
(b) real parts of effective permittivity; (c) real parts of effective
refraction index.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 13, 2009 147
4. CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES
net structure and its variations,” Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 75, 235114,
2007.
10. Guven, K., A. O. Cakmak, M. D. Caliskan, T. F. Gundogdu,
M. Kafesaki, C. M. Soukoulis, and E. Ozbay, “Bilayer
metamaterial: Analysis of left-handed transmission and retrieval
of effective medium parameters,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt.,
Vol. 9, 361–365, 2007.
11. Zhou, J. F., T. Koschny, L. Zhang, G. Tuttle, and C. M. Soukoulis,
“Experimental demonstration of negative index of refraction,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 88, 221103, 2006.
12. Wang, J. F., S. B. Qu, Z. X, J. Q. Zhang, H. Ma, Y. M. Yang,
and C. Gu, “Broadband planar left-handed metamaterials using
split-ring resonator pairs,” Photon Nanostruct.: Fundam Appl.,
Vol. 7, 2009 (accepted).
13. Holloway, C. L., E. F. Kuester, J. Baker-Jarvis, and P. Kabos,
“A double negative (DNG) composite medium composed of
magnetodielectric spherical particles embedded in a matrix,”
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propgat. Vol. 51, No. 10, 2596–2603, 2003.
14. Kim, J. and A. Gopinath, “Simulation of a metamaterial
containing cubic high dielectric resonators,” Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 76,
115126, 2007.
15. Ahmadi, A. and H. Mosallaei, “Physical configuration and
performance modeling of all-dielectric metamaterials,” Phys. Rev.
B, Vol. 77, 045104, 2008.
16. Popa, B.-I. and S. A. Cummer, “Compact dielectric particles as
a building block for low-loss magnetic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev.
Lett., Vol. 100, 207401, 2008.
17. Peng, L., L. X. Ran, H. S. Chen, H. F. Zhang, J. A. Kong,
and T. M. Grzegorczyk, “Experimental observation of left-handed
behavior in an array of standard dielectric resonators,” Phys. Rev.
Lett., Vol. 98, 157403, 2007.
18. Lepetit, T. and E. Akmansoy, “Magnetism in high-contrast
dielectric photonic crystals,” Microwave Opt. Tech. Lett., Vol. 50,
909–911, 2008.
19. Jylhä, L., I. Kolmakov, S. Maslovski, and S. Tretyakova,
“Modeling of isotropic backward-wave materials composed of
resonant spheres,” J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 99, 043102, 2006.
20. Kajfez, D. and P. Guillon, Noble Publishing Corp., Georgia, 1998.
21. Chen, X. D., T. M. Grzegorczyk, B.-I. Wu, J. Pacheco, Jr., and
J. A. Kong, “Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective
parameters of metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 70, 016608,
View publication stats
2004.
22. Smith, D. R., D. C. Vier, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Elec-
tromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamate-
rials,” Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 71, 036617, 2005.
23. Koschny, T., P. Markos, D. R. Smith, and C. M. Soukoulis,
“Resonant and antiresonant frequency dependence of the effective
parameters of metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 68, 065602,
2003.