0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views5 pages

Solutions Manual For Surface Water Quality Modeling 9780070113640 0070113645 9780070113657 0070113653 - Compress 85 89

The document discusses the application of Stokes law to calculate settling velocities of plankton and inorganic particles, highlighting variability in plankton settling rates due to growth conditions. It presents equations for mass balances in water and sediments, as well as models for sediment traps and diffusion reactions. Additionally, it explores the relationship between wind velocity and resuspension velocities, emphasizing the sporadic nature of resuspension events.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views5 pages

Solutions Manual For Surface Water Quality Modeling 9780070113640 0070113645 9780070113657 0070113653 - Compress 85 89

The document discusses the application of Stokes law to calculate settling velocities of plankton and inorganic particles, highlighting variability in plankton settling rates due to growth conditions. It presents equations for mass balances in water and sediments, as well as models for sediment traps and diffusion reactions. Additionally, it explores the relationship between wind velocity and resuspension velocities, emphasizing the sporadic nature of resuspension events.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

LECTURE 17: ORISA RHANEI.

17.1 Stokes law can be employed to calculate settling velocities and the following plot developed. Note
how the stationary and growth estimates for the plankton are connected with lines to highlight the
variation due to growth condition.

measured 100 inorganics

plankton
(growth) 10

0.001

Several observations can be drawn from this plot:

Stokes law does a respectable job for the inorganic particles.


e In contrast, there is much more variability for the plankton. In particular the cell status interjects
almost an order-of-magnitude difference in the settling velocity.
e Plankton settle faster when they are not actively growing.
© The major systematic difference for the plankton seems to be that Stokes law overpredicts settling
for the smaller plankton.

17.2 Using the smaller deposition zone area,

9
% = 212x10 21-05 _ go o1814.™= 0929 mm

~ 10000x 10° (1-0.9)2.4x10° — yr yr

This result can be substituted into Eq. 17.21 to determine

v,=91 2s——_%5__ — 0.001814 = 0,0000869™ = 0.0869 ==


(1- 0.9)2.4 x 10° yt yt

17.3 (a) Steady-state mass balances for solids can be developed for the water and bottom sediments as

0=W,+W, -Qm-v,Agn+v,A,(1-~)p
0=v,A,m—v,A,(t- 9)p—v,4,1-#)p @

Google
These equations can be added to develop a balance around the entire system,

0=W,+W, -Qm-v,4,(1-9)p
which can be solved
for

_W+W,-Qm_ 01x10? +02. 10° -0.05x 10° = 0001


°A,d-9)p 10°(1-0.9)2.5 x 10° :

(6) A model of the sediment traps can be expressed as

Wyocum = VsArep"

which can be employed


to determine

Wocass 20 g/ yr m
Ags = —250x10% 42m’(5 g/m’)3, = 160——
yt

(c) Eq. i can be rearranged


to determine

5
v, =v, ——v,
m
= 160 > 0001 = 0.0022 m
"0-08 °— (1-09)25x108 yt
17.4 A steady-state mass balance for a diffusing/reacting substance in a sediment with negligible burial
can be written as

2
o= DS - ke
dz

which can be integrated with the boundary conditions

(0) = ¢
c(o)=0

to yield

c= Oe -VkiDs

Therefore, if the model holds, a semi-log plot of c/co versus depth should yield a straight line
with a slope of -vk/D. Such a plot, which is shown below, yields a slope estimate of -0.00979.
The reaction rate is

0.693
k = —— = 0.02476 yr™
28 y
and the diffusion coefficient can then be estimated as

p= 002476 em? yt cm?


= = 819 x 10°
0.00979? yr 86400 s-365d s

17.2

Google
0 50 100 150 200

0.1

17.8 According to Eq. 17.31, a semi-log plot of concentration versus depth should yield a straight line
with a slope of —k/v,. Such a plot, which is shown below, yields a slope estimate of —0.5555. The
reaction rate is

0 2 4 6
10

0.1

0.01

The layer at 3 cm then corresponds to

0.03 m
At =—__—_" _ = 46.6 yrs
0.000643 m/yr
It, therefore, corresponds to 1975 - 46.6 = 1928.

17.3

Google
17.6 A centered-difference finite-difference model of the diffusion reaction equation was coupled with a
model of the lake. Mass balances for the lake (segment 0) and the sediments (segments 1 through 7)
are

Vv do
oat = —Qey
Ocy — KVyey
DA
o*o +— (« - 0)

VY, a
de, =-kVe,+ x
DA, © —¢)+ a
DA -%)

de,_; DA. DA
ml a = WV Cnn + hn —Cn-1) +77 Gn — qa)
de, DA,
Ve a = -kV,¢, + 7 Cyt — on)

These equations can be integrated with the initial condition co = m/V> = 5 Ci/10x10° m’ = $00 nCi/L.
The results for the sediments are displayed below.

e (Ci L)

1s} 7™
As can be seen, the signal penetrates to about 1 m into the sediments. After about 10 yrs, the
concentration drops to about 125 nCi/L near the surface.

17.7 Using the same approach as in Example 17.5, a range of wind velocities be employed to
generate resuspension velocities as in the plot below. Two features of the graph bear mention. First,
nothing happens until a rather high wind speed (15 mps) imparts enough energy to the water so that
the critical shear stress is exceeded. Second, once the critical level is exceeded, the resuspension
velocity grows rapidly with increasing wind. This is the result of the strong dependence on wind
velocity (sixth power) of the underlying equations. The general conclusion is that resuspension is a
sporadic process that will be dictated by a few high-wind events.

17.4

Google
0.04

0.02

10 15 20
U(ms")

17.5
Google

You might also like