100% found this document useful (2 votes)
35 views33 pages

Antimicrobial Resistance in Environmental Waters Charmaine NG PDF Download

The document discusses the issue of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in environmental waters, highlighting its implications for public health due to the overuse of antibiotics. It presents a collection of articles focused on monitoring AMR in aquatic systems, including the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes, and emphasizes the need for surveillance and research to manage this growing health threat. The special issue aims to provide insights into the trends and transformations of AMR in various water environments to aid in public health protection efforts.

Uploaded by

gladoupetera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
35 views33 pages

Antimicrobial Resistance in Environmental Waters Charmaine NG PDF Download

The document discusses the issue of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in environmental waters, highlighting its implications for public health due to the overuse of antibiotics. It presents a collection of articles focused on monitoring AMR in aquatic systems, including the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes, and emphasizes the need for surveillance and research to manage this growing health threat. The special issue aims to provide insights into the trends and transformations of AMR in various water environments to aid in public health protection efforts.

Uploaded by

gladoupetera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Antimicrobial Resistance In Environmental Waters

Charmaine Ng download

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-
environmental-waters-charmaine-ng-54701088

Explore and download more ebooks at ebookbell.com


Here are some recommended products that we believe you will be
interested in. You can click the link to download.

Antimicrobial Resistance In The Environment Patricia L Keen

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-the-
environment-patricia-l-keen-4299330

Antimicrobial Resistance In Wastewater And Human Health Dharm Pal

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-wastewater-
and-human-health-dharm-pal-49169080

Antimicrobial Resistance In Developing Countries 1st Edition Carlos F


Ambilecuevas Auth

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-developing-
countries-1st-edition-carlos-f-ambilecuevas-auth-2178384

Antimicrobial Resistance In Bacteria From Livestock And Companion


Animals Asm Books 1st Edition Stefan Schwarz

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-bacteria-
from-livestock-and-companion-animals-asm-books-1st-edition-stefan-
schwarz-55626430
Antimicrobial Resistance In Wastewater Treatment Processes Patricia L
Keen

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-wastewater-
treatment-processes-patricia-l-keen-6839438

Antimicrobial Resistance In The 21st Century 2nd Ed I W Fong

https://ebookbell.com/product/antimicrobial-resistance-in-the-21st-
century-2nd-ed-i-w-fong-7321744

Effluxmediated Antimicrobial Resistance In Bacteria Mechanisms


Regulation And Clinical Implications 1st Edition Xianzhi Li

https://ebookbell.com/product/effluxmediated-antimicrobial-resistance-
in-bacteria-mechanisms-regulation-and-clinical-implications-1st-
edition-xianzhi-li-5606488

Emerging Modalities In Mitigation Of Antimicrobial Resistance Nadeem


Akhtar

https://ebookbell.com/product/emerging-modalities-in-mitigation-of-
antimicrobial-resistance-nadeem-akhtar-38278236

Handbook On Antimicrobial Resistance Current Status Trends In


Detection And Mitigation Measures 1st Mukteswar Prasad Mothadaka
Editor

https://ebookbell.com/product/handbook-on-antimicrobial-resistance-
current-status-trends-in-detection-and-mitigation-measures-1st-
mukteswar-prasad-mothadaka-editor-50892798
Antimicrobial
Resistance
in Environmental
Waters
Edited by
Karina Yew-Hoong Gin and Charmaine Ng
Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Water

www.mdpi.com/journal/water
Antimicrobial Resistance
in Environmental Waters
Antimicrobial Resistance
in Environmental Waters

Special Issue Editors


Karina Yew-Hoong Gin
Charmaine Ng

MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade


Special Issue Editors
Karina Yew-Hoong Gin Charmaine Ng
National University of Singapore National University of Singapore
Singapore Singapore

Editorial Office
MDPI
St. Alban-Anlage 66
4052 Basel, Switzerland

This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal
Water (ISSN 2073-4441) from 2017 to 2019 (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/si/water/
Antimicrobial-Resistance-Environmental-Waters).

For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as
indicated below:

LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number,
Page Range.

ISBN 978-3-03897-608-0 (Pbk)


ISBN 978-3-03897-609-7 (PDF)

Cover image courtesy of Charmaine Ng.


c 2019 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon
published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum
dissemination and a wider impact of our publications.
The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
license CC BY-NC-ND.
Contents

About the Special Issue Editors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

Preface to ”Antimicrobial Resistance in Environmental Waters” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix

Charmaine Ng and Karina Yew-Hoong Gin


Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Dissemination in Aquatic Systems
Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 71, doi:10.3390/w11010071 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Kevin Lambirth, Matthew Tsilimigras, Anju Lulla, James Johnson, Abrar Al-Shaer,
Orion Wynblatt, Shannon Sypolt, Cory Brouwer, Sandra Clinton, Olya Keen,
Molly Redmond, Anthony Fodor and Cynthia Gibas
Microbial Community Composition and Antibiotic Resistance Genes within a North Carolina
Urban Water System
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 1539, doi:10.3390/w10111539 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Hsin-Chi Tsai, Ming-Yuan Chou, Yi-Jia Shih, Tung-Yi Huang, Pei-Yu Yang, Yi-Chou Chiu,
Jung-Sheng Chen and Bing-Mu Hsu
Distribution and Genotyping of Aquatic Acinetobacter baumannii Strains Isolated from the Puzi
River and Its Tributaries Near Areas of Livestock Farming
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 1374, doi:10.3390/w10101374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Asli Aslan, Zachariah Cole, Anunay Bhattacharya and Oghenekpaobor Oyibo


Presence of Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli in Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents Utilized
as Water Reuse for Irrigation
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 805, doi:10.3390/w10060805 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Pierangeli G. Vital, Enrico S. Zara, Cielo Emar M. Paraoan, Ma. Angela Z. Dimasupil,
Joseth Jermaine M. Abello, I ñigo Teodoro G. Santos and Windell L. Rivera
Antibiotic Resistance and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production of Escherichia coli
Isolated from Irrigation Waters in Selected Urban Farms in Metro Manila, Philippines
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 548, doi:10.3390/w10050548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

Muhammad Raihan Jumat, Muhammad Fauzi Haroon, Nada Al-Jassim, Hong Cheng and
Pei-Ying Hong
An Increase of Abundance and Transcriptional Activity for Acinetobacter junii Post
Wastewater Treatment
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 436, doi:10.3390/w10040436 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

Junying Lu, Zhe Tian, Jianwei Yu, Min Yang and Yu Zhang
Distribution and Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Sand Settling Reservoirs and
Drinking Water Treatment Plants across the Yellow River, China
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 246, doi:10.3390/w10030246 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

Zheng Xu, Yue Jiang, Shu Harn Te, Yiliang He and Karina Yew-Hoong Gin
The Effects of Antibiotics on Microbial Community Composition in an Estuary Reservoir during
Spring and Summer Seasons
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 154, doi:10.3390/w10020154 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

Yue Jiang, Cong Xu, Xiaoyu Wu, Yihan Chen, Wei Han, Karina Yew-Hoong Gin and
Yiliang He
Occurrence, Seasonal Variation and Risk Assessment of Antibiotics in Qingcaosha Reservoir
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 115, doi:10.3390/w10020115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118

v
Yihan Chen, Hongjie Chen, Li Zhang, Yue Jiang, Karina Yew-Hoong Gin and Yiliang He
Occurrence, Distribution, and Risk Assessment of Antibiotics in a Subtropical
River-Reservoir System
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 104, doi:10.3390/w10020104 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133

Jennipher Quach-Cu, Bellanira Herrera-Lynch, Christine Marciniak, Scott Adams,


April Simmerman and Ryan A. Reinke
The Effect of Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Wastewater Treatment Processes on Antibiotic
Resistance Gene (ARG) Concentrations in Solid and Dissolved Wastewater Fractions
Reprinted from: Water 2018, 10, 37, doi:10.3390/w10010037 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149

Joyce Seow Fong Chin, Sheetal Sinha, Anjaiah Nalaparaju, Joey Kuok Hoong Yam, Zhiqiang
Qin, Luyan Ma, Zhao-Xun Liang, Lanyuan Lu, Surajit Bhattacharjya and Liang Yang
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Psl Exopolysaccharide Interacts with the Antimicrobial Peptide LG21
Reprinted from: Water 2017, 9, 681, doi:10.3390/w9090681 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167

vi
About the Special Issue Editors
Karina Yew-Hoong Gin is an Associate Professor with the Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, National University of Singapore. She received her Bachelor degree in Civil Engineering
from the University of Melbourne in 1988 and her M.Eng Degree from the National University of
Singapore in 1991. She obtained her Doctor of Science (ScD) Degree jointly from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in 1996. Her research
specialization is in the area of water quality, fate and transport of emerging contaminants, and
ecosystem processes.

Charmaine Ng is a Research Fellow with the Department of Surgery, National University of


Singapore. She graduated with a PhD in microbiology at the University of New South Wales,
Australia in 2011. Her research interests include marine and freshwater microbial ecology,
antimicrobial resistance, and the study of the human microbiome in relation to different disease states.

vii
Preface to ”Antimicrobial Resistance in
Environmental Waters”
In recent years, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance has drawn heightened global concern
because of its severe ramifications on the treatment of microbial infections. In particular, the issue
of antibiotic resistance arises due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in both developed and
developing countries. Bacteria develop antibiotic resistance in the presence of residual levels of
antibiotics, and these antibiotic-resistant bacteria are in turn able to spread their resistance to other
bacteria through mechanisms such as horizontal gene transfer, mediated by mobile genetic elements
(e.g., plasmids, integrons) or co-selecting agents such as biocides and toxic metals. There is a worrying
trend that pathogens are developing antibiotic resistance to a degree where last-resort antibiotics are
no longer effective. This, in turn, has severe implications for public health and healthcare costs.
In an effort to better understand the rising levels of antimicrobial resistance, surveillance
studies have been undertaken across countries in a common effort to explore the occurrence of
antimicrobial resistance in both clinical and natural environments. Implementing such initiatives
by assessing the types of antibiotics used, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) present, and associated
antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in microbiomes enables a better understanding of the impact of
antibiotics in the medicine, agriculture, and aquaculture industries. Aquatic environments harbor
diverse freshwater bacterial communities which may be subjected to anthropogenic pressures,
while domestic wastewaters receive direct loads of antibiotics and pathogenic bacteria from human
excretion. The nature of these environments allows them to function as hotspots for resistance
through the selection of ARB and the circulation of ARGs through the stimulation of horizontal gene
transfer between members of the microbiome.
The aims of this Special Issue are to present current trends in antimicrobial/antibiotic
resistance in diverse environmental waters, ranging from the detection and occurrence of
antimicrobial factors (e.g., antimicrobials, antibiotics, ARB, ARGs) to their fate and transformations
in different environments such as surface waters, groundwaters, biofilms, and water and wastewater
treatment processes. This knowledge is needed to assist in the management and control of
antimicrobial/antibiotic resistance and, ultimately, the protection of public health.

Karina Yew-Hoong Gin, Charmaine Ng


Special Issue Editors

ix
water
Editorial
Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Dissemination
in Aquatic Systems
Charmaine Ng 1 and Karina Yew-Hoong Gin 2,3, *
1 Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore,
Singapore 117411, Singapore; [email protected]
2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore,
Singapore 138602, Singapore
3 NUS Environmental Research Institute (NERI), Singapore 138602, Singapore
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +65-65168104

Received: 13 December 2018; Accepted: 28 December 2018; Published: 3 January 2019 

Abstract: This special issue on Antimicrobial Resistance in Environmental Waters features 11


articles on monitoring and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in natural aquatic systems
(reservoirs, rivers), and effluent discharge from water treatment plants to assess the effectiveness of
AMR removal and resulting loads in treated waters. The occurrence and distribution of antimicrobials,
antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and mobile genetic elements
(MGEs) was determined by utilizing a variety of techniques including liquid chromatography—mass
spectrometry in tandem (LC-MS/MS), traditional culturing, antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST),
molecular and OMIC approaches. Some of the key elements of AMR studies presented in this
special issue highlight the underlying drivers of AMR contamination in the environment and
evaluation of the hazard imposed on aquatic organisms in receiving environments through ecological
risk assessments. As described in this issue, screening antimicrobial peptide (AMP) libraries for
biofilm disruption and antimicrobial candidates are promising avenues for the development of new
treatment options to eradicate resistance. This editorial puts into perspective the current AMR
problem in the environment and potential new methods which could be applied to surveillance and
monitoring efforts.

Keywords: Antimicrobial Resistance; Environmental Waters; water treatment plants; water reuse;
ecological risk assessment

1. Introduction
The release of antimicrobials, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes
(ARGs) originating from human and animal waste to the environment is a global problem which
has serious ramifications on public health. In response to this growing health threat, the World
Health Organization (WHO) launched a global action plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)
in 2015 with 5 strategic objectives, one of which was to strengthen knowledge of the spread of
AMR through surveillance and research [1]. As a guide, the WHO has drawn up a priority list
of AMR pathogens based on the threat they pose on human infections, response to antibiotic
treatment, transmissibility between humans and animals, and whether there are antibiotics in current
research and development pipelines to treat infections caused by these pathogens. Those of highest
priority are carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
and carbapenem-resistant, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae [2].
The WHO’s Global Antimicrobial Surveillance System (GLASS) report for 2018 revealed widespread
occurrence of antibiotic resistance among half a million people with suspected bacterial infections

Water 2019, 11, 71; doi:10.3390/w11010071 1 www.mdpi.com/journal/water


Water 2019, 11, 71

across 22 countries [3]. An AMR risk assessment of the South East Asian Region by Chereau et al. [4]
concluded a high likelihood of emergence and dissemination among humans. Low stewardship on
antibiotic prescription in treatment of human infections and the absence of legal frameworks for
antibiotic use in animal husbandry and aquaculture are the main drivers for the selection of ARB in
South East Asia [5]. The direct release or insufficient treatment of wastewater effluents from healthcare,
livestock, aquaculture, and agriculture sites into receiving environments also poses a significant risk.
In 2013, China alone produced 92,700 tonnes of antibiotics, 48% of which were consumed by humans
and 52% by animals [6]. It was reported that almost half of all antibiotics were released in rivers
through wastewater effluents and the practice of manure and sludge land spreading [6].
In South East Asia, AMR risk ranking across humans, animals, and environmental compartments
show that human to human transmission in community and hospital settings represent the highest
risk of the emergence and selection of AMR vectors (ARB, ARGs), followed by food- and waterborne
transmission to humans through ingestion of contaminated sources [4]. Although transmission via
contact with contaminated environments (through soil, water, and air), and livestock/animals is
regarded as low risk in comparison to human to human transmission, it is still considered a valid
route of exposure, particularly in countries that are water-scarce and reliant on water reuse. Hence,
it is crucial to address the impact of antimicrobials, ARB and ARGs on AMR prevalence in receiving
environments, specifically in countries where data availability is scant and guidelines for AMR
stewardship frameworks have yet to be established. It is only through identifying and tracking sources
and sinks of AMR in the environment, where intervention strategies can be devised to prevent and
control the spread of the problem.

2. Measuring Vectors of AMR

2.1. Antimicrobials
Currently, there are various practices and methods of monitoring AMR dissemination and the
fate of ARB and ARGs in aquatic environmental systems. Highly sensitive analytical protocols have
been developed to detect antimicrobials using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
in environmental water samples and effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [7,8],
while culture-based techniques are used to enumerate ARB.

2.2. ARB
Most environmental and wastewater treatment AMR surveys use methods applied in clinical
settings, where media is supplemented with antibiotics at concentrations above the recommended
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints implemented by the Clinical and Laboratory
Standards Institute [9] or the European Committee on antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [10–17].
For non-clinically relevant bacteria (such as environmental bacteria), epidemiological cut-off values
(ECOFF) are an alternative method used to gauge non-wild-type bacteria that display reduced
susceptibility to certain antimicrobials or biocides [18]. Further testing of multidrug resistance
(MDR) of ARB isolates are performed using broth dilution assays, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test on
Muller-Hinton agar, or high-throughput platforms such as the VITEK system by bioMerieux (France).

2.3. ARGs, MGEs


To detect the prevalence of ARGs and vectors such as mobile genetic elements (MGE) that may
facilitate horizontal gene transfer of ARGs, traditional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR),
and the more recent high-throughput qPCR (HT-qPCR) platform with capabilities of detection of ~200
different ARGs and mobile genetic elements (MGE), has been used to compare relative concentrations of
AMR contamination across a variety of aquatic environments including water treatment plants [19–24].
OMIC approaches such as metagenomics are able to provide a holistic picture of the diversity of
ARGs, MGE and vectors (e.g., integrons, plasmids) that assist horizontal gene transfer, and the overall

2
Water 2019, 11, 71

microbial community structure (bacteria, viruses) in environmental systems and wastewaters [25–29].
ResCap, a targeted capture platform (TCP) designed to analyze ~78,000 ARGs, metal resistance and
plasmid markers is a targeted metagenomics approach for qualitative and quantitative resistome
analysis [30]. Other OMIC approaches, such as metatranscriptomics, enable the identification of active
microbial members within a community and, in the context of AMR, enables the measurement of
transcription activity of ARB through ARG expression [31].

3. Key Outcomes of this Special Issue


This special issue comprises of 11 research articles that fall within the scope of AMR. Broadly,
topics extend from AMR monitoring and surveillance in environmental resources and effluents from
water/wastewater treatment plants [32–39], antimicrobial ecological risk assessments of two river
reservoir systems in China that are sources of drinking water supply [40,41], and exploring novel
strategies of using engineered antimicrobial peptides (AMP) to target specific bacteria to disrupt
biofilms that are major causes of chronic and persistent infections [42].

AMR Monitoring and Surveillance


Knowledge of removal efficiencies of technology employed at WWTPs is essential in AMR
surveillance, whether effluents are intended for discharge into the environment or reuse for
irrigation purposes.
To determine the presence of antibiotic resistant E. coli in a conventional WWTP in Georgia,
Aslan et al. [36] isolated E. coli from post-secondary, post-UV and post-chlorination effluent and
performed antibiotic susceptibility tests on the isolates. They reported that ~5.2 log removal of E. coli
and an additional 1.1 log reduction post chlorination was obtained. However, the MICs of E. coli
isolated in the finished water were higher than those at the other treatment stages. The selection of more
resistant organisms in the finished water underscores the urgent need to evaluate the health risks of
using reclaimed water for downstream irrigation. In a qPCR assessment of ARGs of a full-scale tertiary
water reclamation plant, Quach-Cu et al. [39] showed that tertiary-stage WWTPs with disinfection had
superior removal of ARGs (sul1, blaSHV/TEM ), ~3–4 logs compared to reliance of secondary treatment
alone where the removal was only ~1–3 logs. To assess the impact of treated effluent on receiving
environments, Lambirth et al. [35] measured the removal efficiency of ten antibiotics and assayed
resistomes upstream, downstream and within various treatment steps of two urban WWTPs (secondary
and disinfection treatments). The authors found elevated concentration of all 10 antibiotics surveyed
in downstream receiving waters compared to waters upstream of the WWTP. The relative abundance
of ARG signatures encoding for resistance to carbapenems and ESBL antibiotics were much lower
than those detected upstream and sampling points within the WWTP, which debunks the notion that
the wastewater treatment process selects for ARG resistance. Instead, the authors hypothesized that
antibiotics discharged from treated wastewater effluent into the downstream environment may have
an effect on natural microbial communities.
Jumat et al. [37] conducted an ESBL study of diversity and transcriptional activity of bacteria in
a WWTP in Saudi Arabia using metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and real-time qPCR. They found
an increase in the relative abundance of Acinetobacter junii in MBR- and chlorinated treated effluent.
Survival and predominance of A. junii was explained by metatranscriptomics data that showed
an upregulation of gene associated with active cell repair, resistance, virulence (efflux transporters
involved in metal and antibiotic resistance) and cell signaling. These adaptive cellular mechanisms
enable A. junii to withstand depletion of nutrients and counter the effects of chlorination. However,
the authors indicate that the low concentrations of viable A. junii isolated from MBR effluents may
not present that huge a risk. The varying results from WWTP studies covered in this issue makes it
challenging to establish whether WWTPs are indeed hotspots of AMR dissemination. Rather, it is likely
that differences in global and plant operating process contribute to variation in antibiotic resistance
elements detection.

3
Water 2019, 11, 71

In countries with high agricultural productivity, water reuse is commonly practiced to meet
the high water demands of the industry [43]. On a global scale, there are no clear guidelines
implemented on assessment of water quality for reuse purposes, although a few countries have
drawn up recommended microbiological parameters to monitor the quality of recycled water [44].
A recent review by Hong et al. [44] highlights the urgency of understanding the risks of microbiological
and ARG contamination linked to water reuse. In the Philippines, surface waters contaminated
with fecal coliform are frequently used for irrigating urban farms in densely populated cities [45].
Vital et al. [33] evaluated the antibiotic resistance profiles of 212 E. coli strains isolated from irrigation
water, soil, and vegetables from six urban agricultural farms. Of the total isolates, 36.5% were resistant
to more than three antibiotics tested, with the most multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates being detected
in irrigation water, followed by soil and vegetables. Of the MDR E. coli isolated from irrigation water,
7 of them were ESBL producers that carried either blaTEM or blaCTX-M genes, which raises public health
concerns in primary production environments such as agricultural soils and fresh produce grown in
these areas.
The use of antimicrobials in food animals is widespread, and runoffs originating from
animal waste may carry unmetabolized antibiotics or ARB and ARGs that have direct impact
on surrounding water bodies [46]. Tsai et al. [32] linked significantly higher concentrations
of A. baumannii along the Puzi River in China to sampling sites of livestock wastewater
channels and tributaries adjacent to livestock farms. Further testing of 20 A. baumannii isolates
against 7 antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, cefepime, gentamicin, imipenem, ampicillin-sulbactam,
sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, tetracycline) by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test showed that only
10% had resistance to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and 5% had resistance to tetracycline. Although
the A. baumannii isolated by Tsai et al. [32] did not display MDR patterns which are regarded a serious
AMR threat by WHO, their epidemiological potential warrants further studies on prevalence and AMR
developmental trends in the environment.
In China, the Yellow River in the North serves as an important source of drinking water and is
flanked by cities along its banks and watersheds. Previous studies have reported high turbidity and
concentrations of antimicrobials in the Yellow River Catchment [47]. This prompted Lu et al. [38] to
investigate the distribution and abundance of ARGs in Sand Settling Reservoirs (SSR) and Drinking
Water Treatment Plants (DWTP) along the Yellow River. By targeting 17 ARGs as a proxy for AMR
removal through the treatment process, the total concentrations of ARGs decreased from 104 copies/mL
in influent river waters to 103 copies/mL in SSR effluent to 102 copies/mL in finished water. The 2 MGE
targets decreased by at least an order of magnitude, from 106 copies/mL in influent river waters to
105 copies/mL in finished waters.
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of ARGs in the mammalian gut through the ingestion of
contaminated food or water generally poses a low risk due to harsh conditions in the gut. However,
this may present a greater risk for propagation in the environment through transformation and
transduction [44]. In another study by Xu et al. [34], the authors studied the relationship of 16
antibiotics with environmental water quality parameters and the impact of antibiotic concentrations on
the microbial community structure along Qingcaosha Reservoir, the largest estuary reservoir in China.
This reservoir has a similar function to the Yellow River, in that it compensates for drinking water
shortages in Shanghai. From the study, the authors concluded that upstream runoffs and anthropogenic
activity along the river contributed to the concentrations of antibiotics measured within the reservoir,
and that tylosin, penicillin G and erythromycin-H2 O showed significant correlations with variations
in bacterial community structure. Further to this study, Jiang et al. [40] studied seasonal variations
of antibiotics in surface waters of Qingcaosha Reservoir. By using risk quotients (RQs) based on the
European technical guidance documentation (TGD) on risk assessment, they showed that out of the
17 antibiotics monitored, four antibiotics (doxycycline, penicillinV, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin) posed
a high risk to relevant sensitive aquatic organisms, as well as imposed selective stress on microbial
communities. In another study, of a subtropical river-reservoir system located in the Headwater Region

4
Water 2019, 11, 71

of the Dongjiang River which supplies drinking water to three major cities in China, Chen et al. [41]
conducted an ecological risk assessment which showed that concentrations of ciprofloxacin and
norfloxacin posed a moderate risk, while tetracycline posed a higher risk to the aquatic ecosystem.
Finally, through screening a local antimicrobial peptide (AMP) library, Chin et al. [42] identified
LG21, an AMP that specifically binds to exopolysaccharide PsI of P. aeruginosa that has a functional role
of biofilm formation, which provides a protective environment for tolerance and resistance towards
antibiotic treatment. This strategy of exploring AMP to target specific biofilm matrix components to
disrupt formation and development of biofilms is a promising line of treatment to eradicate antibiotic
resistant biofilms in both environmental and clinical settings.

Acknowledgments: The guest editors are grateful to the authors that contributed their work to this special issue.
We would also like to thank the reviewers and journal editors who dedicated their time and expertise towards
evaluating the articles.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https:
//www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/global-action-plan/en/ (accessed on 29 December 2018).
2. World Health Organization. WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics are Urgently Needed.
Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/
(accessed on 29 December 2018).
3. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (GLASS) Report. Available
online: https://www.who.int/glass/resources/publications/early-implementation-report/en/ (accessed
on 29 December 2018).
4. Chereau, F.; Opatowski, L.; Tourdjman, M.; Vong, S. Risk assessment for antibiotic resistance in South East
Asia. BMJ 2017, 358. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Holloway, K.A.; Kotwani, A.; Batmanabane, G.; Puri, M.; Tisocki, K. Antibiotic use in South East Asia and
policies to promote appropriate use: Reports from county situational analyses. BMJ 2017, 358. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
6. Zhang, Q.Q.; Ying, G.G.; Pan, C.G.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhao, J.L. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and
fate in the river basins of China: Source analysis, multimedia modelling, and linkage to bacterial resistance.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6772–6782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Tran, N.H.; Chen, H.; Do, T.V.; Van Do, T.; Reinhard, M.; Ngo, H.H.; He, Y.; Gin, K.Y.H. Simultaneous
analysis of multiple classes of antimicrobials in environmental water samples using SPE coupled with
UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS and isotope dilution. Talanta 2016, 159, 163–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Tran, N.H.; Chen, H.; Reinhard, M.; Mao, F.; Gin, K.Y.H. Occurrence and removal of multiple classes of
antibiotic snad antimicrobial agents in biological wastewater treatment processes. Water Rese. 2016, 104,
461–472. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Available online: https://clsi.org/meetings/
microbiology/ (accessed on 29 December 2018).
10. EUCAST. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Available online: http://www.
eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (accessed on 29 December 2018).
11. Le, T.H.; Ng, C.; Tran, N.H.; Chen, H.; Gin, K.Y.H. Removal of antibiotic residues, antibiotic resistant bacteria
and antibiotic resistance genes in municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactor systems. Water Res. 2018,
145, 498–508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Ng, C.; Chen, H.; Goh, S.G.; Haller, L.; Charles, F.R.; Wu, Z.; Trottet, A.; Gin, K.Y.H. Microbial water
quality and the detection of multidrug resistant E. coli and antibiotic resistance genes in aquaculture sites of
Singapore. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 135, 475–480. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Ng, C.; Goh, S.G.; Saeidi, N.; Gerhard, W.A.; Gunsch, C.K.; Gin, K.Y.H. Occurrence of Vibrio species,
beta-lactam resistant Vibrio species, and indicator bacteria in ballast and port waters of a tropical harbour.
Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610, 651–656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5
Water 2019, 11, 71

14. Haller, L.; Chen, H.; Ng, C.; Le, T.H.; Koh, T.H.; Barkham, T.; Sobsey, M.; Gin, K.Y.H. Occurrence and
characteristics of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-and carbapenemase-producing bacteria from hospital
effluents in Singapore. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 1119–1125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Low, A.; Ng, C.; He, J. Identification of antibiotic resistant bacteria community and a GeoChip based study
of resistome in urban watersheds. Water Res. 2016, 106, 330–338. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Le, T.H.; Ng, C.; Chen, H.; Yi, X.Z.; Koh, T.H.; Barkham, T.M.S.; Zhou, Z.; Gin, K.Y.H. Occurrences and
Characterization of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Genetic Determinants of Hospital Wastewaters in
a Tropical Country. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 21, 7449–7456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Tiu, L.; Wang, H.H. Characterization of antibiotic resistance in commensal bacteria
from an aquaculture ecosystem. Front. Microbiol. 2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Morrissey, I.; Oggioni, M.R.; Knight, D.; Curiao, T.; Coque, T.; Kalkanci, A.; Martinez, J.L. Evaluation of
epidemiological cut-off values indicates that biocide resistant subpopulations are uncommon in nature
isolates of clinically-relevant microoriganisms. PLoS ONE 2014. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Liu, L.; Su, J.Q.; Guo, Y.; Wilkinson, D.M.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Y.G.; Yang, J. Large-scale biogeographical patterns
of bacterial antibiotic resistome in the waterbodies of China. Environ. Int. 2018, 117, 292–299. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
20. Zhu, Y.G.; Zhao, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; Zhang, S.Y.; Yu, S.; Chen, Y.S.; Zhang, T.; Gillings, M.R.; Su, J.Q.
Continental-scale pollution of estuaries with antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 16270.
[CrossRef]
21. Muziasari, W.I.; Pitkanen, L.K.; Sorum, H.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Tiedje, J.M.; Virta, M. The Resistome of Farmed
Fish Feces Contributes to the Enrichment of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Sediments below Baltic Sea Fish
Farms. Front. Microbiol. 2017. [CrossRef]
22. Xu, L.; Ouyang, W.; Qian, Y.; Su, C.; Su, J.; Chen, H. High-throughput profiling of antibiotic resistance genes
in drinking water treatment plants and distribution systems. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 119–126. [CrossRef]
23. An, X.L.; Su, J.Q.; Li, B.; Ouyang, W.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Q.L.; Cui, L.; Chen, H.; Gillings, M.R.; Zhang, T.; et al.
Tracking antibiotic reistome during wastewater treatment using high throughput quantitative PCR. Environ.
Int. 2018, 117, 146–153. [CrossRef]
24. Karkman, A.; Johnson, T.A.; Lyra, C.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Tamminen, M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Virta, M. High-throughput
quantification of antibiotic resistance genes from an urban wastewater treatment plant. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
2016, 92. [CrossRef]
25. Bondarczuk, K.; Piotrowska-Segat, Z. Microbial diversity and antibiotic resistance in a final effluent-receiving
lake. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 650, 2951–2961. [CrossRef]
26. Chu, B.T.T.; Petrovich, M.L.; Chaudhary, A.; Wright, D.; Murphy, B.; Wells, G.; Poretsky, R. Metagenomics
Reveals the Impact of Wastewater Treatment Plants on the Dispersal of Microorganisms and Genes in
Aquatic Sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Gupta, S.K.; Shin, H.; Han, D.; Hur, H.G.; Unno, T. Metagenomic analysis reveals the prevalence and
persistence of antibiotic- and heavy metal-resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant. J. Microbiol. 2018,
56, 408–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Ng, C.; Tay, M.; Tan, B.; Le, T.H.; Haller, L.; Chen, H.; Koh, T.H.; Barkham, T.; Thompson, J.R.; Gin, K.Y.H.
Characterization of Metagenomes in Urban Aquatic Compartments Reveals High Prevalence of Clinically
Relevant Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Wastewaters. Front. Microbiol. 2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Guo, J.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Bond, P.L.; Yuan, Z. Metagenomic analysis reveals wastewater treatment plants as
hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements. Water Res. 2017, 123, 468–478. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
30. Lanza, V.F.; Baquero, F.; Martinez, J.L.; Ramos-Ruiz, R.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Andremont, A.;
Sanchez-Valenzuela, A.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Kennedy, S.; Ruppe, E.; et al. In-depth resistome analysis by targeted
metagenomics. Microbiome 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Rowe, W.P.M.; Baker-Austin, C.; Verner-Jeffreys, D.W.; Ryan, J.J.; Micallef, C.; Maskell, D.J.; Pearce, G.P.
Overexpression of antibiotic resistance genes in hospital effluents over time. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017,
72, 1617–1623. [CrossRef]
32. Tsai, H.-C.; Chou, M.-Y.; Shih, Y.-J.; Huang, T.-Y.; Yang, P.-Y.; Chiu, Y.-C.; Chen, J.-S.; Hsu, B.-M. Distribution
and Genotyping of Aquatic Acinetobacter baumannii Strains Isolated from the Puzi River and Its Tributaries
Near Areas of Livestock Farming. Water 2018, 10, 1374. [CrossRef]

6
Water 2019, 11, 71

33. Vital, P.G.; Zara, E.S.; Paraoan, C.E.M.; Dimasupil, M.A.Z.; Abello, J.J.M.; Santos, I.T.G.; Rivera, W.L.
Antibiotic Resistance and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production of Escherichia coli Isolated from
Irrigation Waters in Selected Urban Farms in Metro Manila, Philippines. Water 2018, 10, 548. [CrossRef]
34. Xu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Te, S.H.; He, Y.; Gin, K.Y.H. The Effects of Antibiotics on Microbial Community Composition
in an Estuary Reservoir during Spring and Summer Sessions. Water 2018, 10, 154. [CrossRef]
35. Lambirth, K.; Tsilimigrae, M.; Lulla, A.; Johnson, J.; Al-Shaer Am Wynblatt, O.; Sypolt, S.; Brouwer, C.;
Clinton, S.; Keen, O.; Redmond, M.; et al. Microbial Community Composition and Antibiotic Resistance
Genes within a North Carolina Urban Water System. Water 2018, 10, 1539. [CrossRef]
36. Aslan, A.; Cole, Z.; Bhattacharya, A.; Oyibo, O. Presence of Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli in Wastewater
Treatment Plant Effluents Utilized as Water Reuse for Irrigation. Water 2018, 10, 805. [CrossRef]
37. Jumat, M.R.; Haroon, M.F.; Al-Jassim, N.; Cheng, H.; Hong, P.-Y. An Increase of Abundance and
Transcriptional Activity for Acinetobacter junii Post Wastewater Treatment. Water 2018, 10, 436. [CrossRef]
38. Lu, J.; Tian, Z.; Yu, J.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Y. Distribution and Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in
Sand Settling Reservoirs and Drinking Water Treatment Plants across the Yellow River, China. Water 2018,
10, 246. [CrossRef]
39. Quach-Cu, J.; Herrera-Lynch, B.; Marciniak, C.; Adams, S.; Simmerman, A.; Reinke, R.A. The Effect of
Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Wastewater Treatment Processes on Antibiotic Resistance Gene (ARG)
Concentrations in Solid and Dissolved Wastewater Fractions. Water 2018, 10, 37. [CrossRef]
40. Jiang, Y.; Xu, C.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y.; Han, W.; Gin, K.Y.H.; He, Y. Occurrence, Seasonal Variation and Risk
Assessment of Antibiotics in Qingcaosha Reservoir. Water 2018, 10, 115. [CrossRef]
41. Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Gin, K.Y.H.; He, Y. Occurrence, Distribution, and Risk Assessment of
Antibiotics in a Subtropical River-Reservoir System. Water 2018, 10, 104. [CrossRef]
42. Chin, J.S.F.; Sinha, S.; Nalaparaju, A.; Yam, J.K.H.; Qin, Z.; Ma, L.; Liang, Z.-X.; Lu, L.; Bhattacharjya, S.;
Yang, L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PsI Exopolysaccharide Interacts with the Antimicrobial Peptide LG21.
Water 2018, 9, 681. [CrossRef]
43. Hong, P.-Y.; Julian, T.R.; Pype, M.-L.; Jiang, S.C.; Nelson, K.L.; Graham, D.; Pruden, A.; Manaia, C.M. Resing
Treated Wastewater: Consideration of the Safety Aspects Associated with Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and
Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Water 2018, 10, 244. [CrossRef]
44. Jaramillo, M.F.; Restrepo, I. Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: A Review about Its Limitations and Benefits.
Sustainability 2017, 9, 1734. [CrossRef]
45. Garcia, B.C.B.; Dimasupil, M.A.Z.; Vital, P.G.; Widmer, K.W.; Rivera, W.L. Fecal contamination in irrigation
water and microbial quality of vegetable primary production in urban farms of Metro Manila, Philippines. J.
Environ. Sci. Health 2015, 50, 734–743. [CrossRef]
46. Landers, T.F.; Cohen, B.; Wittum, T.E.; Larson, E.L. A Review of Antibiotic Use in Food Animals: Perspective,
Policy, and Potential. Public Health Rep. 2012, 127, 4–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Xu, W.; Zhang, G.; Zou, S.; Ling, Z.; Wang, G.; Yan, W. A preliminary investigation on the occurrence and
distribution of antibiotics in the Yellow River and its tributaries, China. Water Environ. Res. 2009, 81, 248–254.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

7
water
Article
Microbial Community Composition and Antibiotic
Resistance Genes within a North Carolina Urban
Water System
Kevin Lambirth 1,2 , Matthew Tsilimigras 1 , Anju Lulla 1 , James Johnson 1 , Abrar Al-Shaer 3 ,
Orion Wynblatt 2 , Shannon Sypolt 4 , Cory Brouwer 1,2 , Sandra Clinton 5 , Olya Keen 6 ,
Molly Redmond 7 , Anthony Fodor 1 and Cynthia Gibas 1, *
1 Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University
City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected] (K.L.); [email protected] (M.T.);
[email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (J.J.); [email protected] (C.B.); [email protected] (A.F.)
2 Bioinformatics Services Division, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 150 N Research Campus Dr,
Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA; [email protected]
3 Department of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive,
Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected]
4 Charlotte Water, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utility Department, 5100 Brookshire Blvd,
Charlotte, NC 28216, USA; [email protected]
5 Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected]
6 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected]
7 Department of Biological Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd,
Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-704-687-8378

Received: 13 September 2018; Accepted: 24 October 2018; Published: 29 October 2018 

Abstract: Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are thought to be potential incubators of antibiotic
resistance. Persistence of commonly used antibiotics in wastewater may increase the potential for
selection of resistance genes transferred between bacterial populations, some of which might pose a
threat to human health. In this study, we measured the concentrations of ten antibiotics in wastewater
plant influents and effluents, and in surface waters up- and downstream from two Charlotte area
treatment facilities. We performed Illumina shotgun sequencing to assay the microbial community
and resistome compositions at each site across four time points from late winter to mid-summer
of 2016. Antibiotics are present throughout wastewater treatment, and elevated concentrations
of multiple antibiotics are maintained in moving stream water downstream of effluent release.
While some human gut and activated sludge associated taxa are detectable downstream, these seem
to attenuate with distance while the core microbial community of the stream remains fairly consistent.
We observe the slight suppression of functional pathways in the downstream microbial communities,
including amino acid, carbohydrate, and nucleic acid metabolism, as well as nucleotide and amino
acid scavenging. Nearly all antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and potentially pathogenic taxa are
removed in the treatment process, though a few ARG markers are elevated downstream of effluent
release. Taken together, these results represent baseline measurements that future studies can utilize
to help to determine which factors control the movement of antibiotics and resistance genes through
aquatic urban ecosystems before, during, and after wastewater treatment.

Keywords: metagenomics; antibiotic resistance; wastewater; environmental ecology

Water 2018, 10, 1539; doi:10.3390/w10111539 8 www.mdpi.com/journal/water


Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived


from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the
United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must
comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted


with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning
of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project


Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a
part of this work or any other work associated with Project
Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this


electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you
provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work
in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in
the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or
expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or
a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original
“Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must
include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in
paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,


performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing


access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who


notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt
that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project
Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or
destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of


any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™


electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may
be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for


the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3,
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim
all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR
NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR
BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK
OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL
NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF
YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you


discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving
it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must
return the medium with your written explanation. The person or
entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide
a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in
lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may
demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted
by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation,


the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation,
anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with
the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or
any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission


of Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.
It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and
donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help,
see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,


Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can
be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the
widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many
small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to
maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating


charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and
keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in
locations where we have not received written confirmation of
compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of
compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where


we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make


any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About


Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge


connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and


personal growth every day!

ebookbell.com

You might also like