BUKU JAWABAN TUGAS MATA KULIAH

TUGAS 2

Nama Mahasiswa : YOGA MAHMUD SAPUTRA

Nomor Induk Mahasiswa/ NIM : 051111244

Kode/Nama Mata Kuliah : Bahasa dan Terminologi Hukum (HKUM4101)

Program Studi : Ilmu Hukum

Kode/Nama UT Daerah : 25/ UT BANDUNG

Masa Ujian : 2024/2025 Ganjil (2025.1)

KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN, KEBUDAYAAN, RISET, DAN TEKNOLOGI

Soal:
Sebelum Anda membaca cerita tersebut, penentuan teknik membaca yang akan Anda gunakan untuk
menjawab pertanyaan berikut ini:

1. refleksi 10 kata kunci dari cerita dibawah ini!

2. Teknik membaca apa yang anda gunakan? apa alasan anda menggunakan teknik tersebut?

Untuk melatih konsentrasi Anda, cobalah membaca cerita di bawah ini hanya satu kali untuk menjawab
pertanyaan tersebut.

A Complicated Inheritance Case

Mr. Yanto, a successful entrepreneur in his city, passed away at the age of 65. His sudden departure
shocked his family, especially his children, Tina, Rudi, and Andi. Mr. Yanto owned numerous assets,
including a corporation, real estate, and other investments. However, he died intestate, leaving his estate to
be distributed according to the applicable inheritance law.

The conflict arose when Rudi, the second child who had worked alongside his father in the family
business, claimed that he was the most entitled to the inheritance. "I have dedicated my life to this
company," he stated during a family meeting. "Without me, this company would not have grown this big."

Tina, the eldest child who worked as a doctor in another city, disagreed. "Inheritance is our collective right,
Rudi. We must divide it equitably," she argued. Meanwhile, Andi, the youngest, who was still in college, felt
caught between his older siblings. He was unfamiliar with business law or estate law, but he knew that
this dispute could permanently damage their family ties.

The family ultimately decided to take the matter to court, filing a lawsuit to request that
the judge determine the distribution of the estate based on legal provisions. The court assigned an
experienced judge in inheritance disputes to oversee the case.

During the trial, the judge explained that under Indonesian inheritance law, all legitimate heirs have
an equal right to their parents' estate. Even though Rudi had contributed significantly to the business, this
did not automatically entitle him to a larger share of the inheritance, unless a last will and
testament stipulated otherwise—which, in this case, did not exist.

However, Rudi did not give up. He presented evidence showing that he had invested his own money into
the company, significantly increasing its value. His legal counsel argued that this contribution should be
considered in the probate process.

Tina countered by submitting documents proving that their father had provided equal financial support to
all three of them throughout their lives, without favoritism. The litigation became prolonged, with both
parties presenting increasingly intense arguments. Tina and Rudi each believed they were the most
deserving heir, while Andi felt overwhelmed and unsure which side to support.

Amid the tension, the family’s attorney, Ms. Siti, suggested mediation. "The court can rule based on the
law, but your family bond may be irreparably broken," she advised. "Perhaps it would be better for you all to
sit down together and find a settlement agreement that satisfies everyone."

The family agreed to attempt mediation. With the help of a neutral mediator, they worked toward a
resolution outside of the courtroom. Through mediation, they realized that the core issue was not
about assets or financial gain, but about mutual respect and acknowledgment of each other's
contributions.

Rudi eventually recognized that while his efforts had been significant in growing the business, his familial
relationship was far more valuable. Likewise, Tina acknowledged that although they were co-heirs, Rudi
had devoted more time and effort to the family business.

After multiple mediation sessions, they reached a mutual agreement. Rudi would receive a larger share
of the business due to his active role, while Tina and Andi would receive equal compensation in the form
of real estate and other investments. This agreement was not only accepted by all parties but also
preserved their family unity.

In the end, the judge ratified the settlement as a court ruling. Although the case began with tension
and legal disputes, Mr. Yanto’s family successfully resolved it in a way that kept their bond intact. They
learned that in matters of inheritance, justice is not only about the equal division of wealth, but also
about recognizing contributions and maintaining family harmony. They moved forward, cherishing the
memory of their father and understanding that, no matter what, family must always come first.

JAWAB:

1. Refleksi 10 Kata Kunci dari Cerita:

 Warisan: Harta yang ditinggalkan oleh Mr. Yanto untuk dibagikan kepada anak-anaknya.

 Mr. Yanto: Tokoh utama yang telah meninggal dan meninggalkan warisan untuk keluarganya.

 Rudi: Anak kedua yang merasa berhak mendapatkan bagian terbesar dari warisan karena
kontribusinya dalam perusahaan keluarga.

 Tina: Anak tertua yang berpendapat bahwa warisan seharusnya dibagi secara adil di antara
mereka.

 Andi: Anak bungsu yang merasa terjebak di antara pendapat kedua kakaknya.
  Pengadilan: Lembaga hukum tempat keluarga mengajukan kasus untuk mendapatkan
keputusan resmi mengenai pembagian warisan.

 Mediasi: Proses penyelesaian konflik yang diusulkan untuk menjaga hubungan baik di antara
anggota keluarga.

 Keluarga: Hubungan antara Tina, Rudi, dan Andi yang menjadi fokus utama dalam
penyelesaian masalah ini.

 Keadilan: Konsep yang dicari dalam pembagian warisan, yang mencakup pembagian yang adil
berdasarkan kontribusi masing-masing.

 Kompensasi: Bentuk imbalan yang diberikan kepada Tina dan Andi sebagai ganti atas bagian
usaha yang lebih besar untuk Rudi.

2. Teknik Membaca yang Digunakan: Saya menggunakan teknik membaca scanning untuk
memahami isi cerita. Alasan penggunaan teknik ini adalah sebagai berikut:

 Efisiensi: Teknik scanning memungkinkan saya untuk dengan cepat menemukan informasi
penting dan kata kunci dalam teks tanpa perlu membaca setiap kalimat secara menyeluruh.

 Identifikasi Poin Utama: Dengan menggunakan scanning, saya dapat dengan mudah
mengidentifikasi elemen-elemen kunci dalam cerita, seperti karakter, konflik, dan solusi yang
diambil.

 Fokus pada Detail Penting: Teknik ini membantu saya menangkap informasi penting yang
berkaitan dengan konflik dan penyelesaian, sehingga saya dapat memahami inti cerita dengan
lebih baik.

 Mendukung Pemahaman Konteks: Scanning juga membantu saya memahami konteks

Sumber Referensi:

Buku Hukum Waris:

o Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2001). Hukum Waris. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

o R. Soesilo. (2010). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Artikel tentang Mediasi:

o Sari, D. (2018). "Peran Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Keluarga". Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,
12(1), 45-60.

Buku tentang Keluarga dan Hubungan Keluarga:

o Santrock, J. W. (2011). Life-Span Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

o Papalia, D. E., & Martorell, G. (2013). Experience Human Development. New York:
McGraw-Hill.