Positive attitudes towards other religions after the early fathers

Table of Contents
 Introduction
With the gradual expansion of Christian theological horizons, influenced by
philosophical inquiry, intercultural contact, and social transformation, various
thinkers and ecclesial leaders began to adopt more nuanced views. These
included acknowledgments of truth and moral virtue in other faiths, a
willingness to engage in respectful dialogue, and, in some cases, the
affirmation of God’s universal presence beyond the visible boundaries of the
Church. The shift from polemical confrontation to empathetic understanding
was neither uniform nor unchallenged, but it marked a significant
progression in Christian attitudes. This study investigates how selected
Christian theologians, mystics, missionaries, and councils after the early
patristic period reimagined the Church’s relationship with religious others. By
doing so, it aims to highlight the theological resources and historical
examples that support the development of more inclusive and dialogical
approaches to interreligious relations.
 Common terms use during and after the early fathers
• Inclusivism
Definition: Inclusivism is the theological position that recognizes the
possibility of salvation or spiritual truth in other religions while maintaining
that one’s own religion holds the fullness or the ultimate truth. For example,
A Christian inclusivist might believe that a sincere Buddhist could be saved
through Christ, even if the person never consciously professed Christian
faith.
• Exclusivism
Exclusivism (or Particularism) is the view that one’s own religion is the only
true path to salvation or ultimate truth and that all other religions are
fundamentally mistaken or insufficient for salvation. For example, A Muslim
exclusivist might believe that only submission to Allah through Islam leads to
salvation, and all other paths are misguided.
• Pluralism
Pluralism is the view that multiple religions can be valid paths to salvation or
ultimate reality, and that no single religion holds a monopoly on truth. For
example, A pluralist might believe that Christians, Muslims, Hindus, and
others all experience and respond to the same divine reality in different, but
equally valid, ways.
 Legacy of the Early Church Fathers
Throughout much of Christian history, exclusivism dominated theological
thought concerning salvation and truth. Rooted in biblical texts such as John
14:6”I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except
through me” exclusivism upheld the belief that salvation was only attainable
through explicit faith in Jesus Christ. Early Church theologians largely
adhered to this view, with occasional theological flexibility, as seen in Justin
Martyr’s semina verbi or the universal Logos. However, as Christianity spread
and encountered diverse cultures, religions, and philosophies, a shift toward
a more open, inclusive theological approach began to develop, particularly in
response to changing social, political, and intellectual contexts.
 The Shift from Exclusivism to Openness
The shift from exclusivism to openness was not a sudden transformation but
a gradual evolution influenced by several factors: increased interreligious
encounters, colonialism and missionary enterprises, philosophical
developments, and the emergence of religious pluralism as a social reality in
modernity. Christian theology began to grapple with how God's grace might
operate beyond the visible Church and how to interpret non-Christian
religions within a broader divine economy.
 Medieval and Scholastic Perspectives
Another contributor to this theological shift has been the increasing visibility
and scholarship of interfaith dialogue. Events such as the Parliament of the
World’s Religions and the formation of the World Council of Churches’ Office
on Interfaith Relations have encouraged cooperative engagement. Such
efforts emphasize shared ethical commitments, mutual respect, and the
pursuit of peace, without demanding doctrinal uniformity.
 Interactions with Islam and Judaism
The interactions between Islam and Judaism are marked by a complex
tapestry of cooperation, theological dialogue, cultural symbiosis, and conflict.
From the golden age of Islamic civilization to modern interfaith efforts, these
two faith traditions have influenced and shaped one another in profound
ways. Understanding this history is crucial for fostering informed dialogue
and peaceful coexistence in our increasingly interconnected world. The
relationship between Islam and Judaism is deeply intertwined, shaped by
centuries of theological, cultural, political, and social interactions. As two of
the three major Abrahamic faiths, Islam and Judaism share significant
theological commonalities, including monotheism, prophetic traditions,
dietary laws, and ritual practices. However, their relationship has also been
marked by periods of conflict, competition, and mutual influence. This paper
explores the historical, theological, and cultural interactions between Islam
and Judaism from the early Islamic period through the modern era,
highlighting both collaboration and conflict across different periods and
regions. In recent decades, Muslim and Jewish communities have engaged in
efforts to repair strained relationships and promote dialogue. Organizations
such as the Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council in the United States and the
Foundation for Ethnic Understanding have facilitated joint initiatives
addressing issues like antisemitism and Islamophobia.
 Reformation and Post-Reformation Developments
The Reformation of the 16th century marked a watershed moment in
Christian theology and ecclesial life. Sparked by Martin Luther’s critiques of
church corruption and theological malpractice, the Reformation led not only
to ecclesiastical fragmentation but also to a reconsideration of key
theological themes, including the nature of salvation, authority, and the role
of the Church. These theological shifts also had implications for how
Christians viewed other religions, though often indirectly. While the primary
focus of the Reformers was internal reform, their theological innovations
eventually laid the groundwork for broader reassessments of religious
diversity. The Post-Reformation period saw the development of Protestant
scholasticism, in which theologians sought to systematize Reformation
doctrines using the tools of Aristotelian philosophy and logic. While this
movement tended to reinforce confessional rigidity, it also laid the
foundation for more philosophical engagement with non-Christian thought.
Figures like Francis Turretin and John Owen engaged in detailed theological
reflection that, while remaining exclusivist, exhibited intellectual openness to
other ideas.
Despite the Reformers’ exclusivist positions, the Reformation contributed to
the eventual broadening of perspectives on other religions in several indirect
ways. First, by challenging the monolithic authority of the Roman Catholic
Church, the Reformation created a theological and cultural environment in
which pluralism initially among Christian sects became more visible. This
intra-Christian pluralism made theological exclusivity more difficult to sustain
over time. Simultaneously, the post-Reformation era coincided with the Age
of Exploration and European colonial expansion. Contact with new cultures
and religions in Asia, Africa, and the Americas posed theological challenges
that neither Luther nor Calvin had anticipated. Protestant missionaries in
these contexts often struggled to reconcile exclusivist theology with the
moral and religious integrity of the peoples they encountered. This tension
led to gradual shifts in missionary theology and practice.
 Protestant Views on Non-Christian Religions
The Protestant world also experienced shifts, particularly through the
influence of liberal theology in the 19 th and 20th centuries. Thinkers like
Friedrich Schleiermacher redefined religion in terms of a universal feeling of
dependence on the divine, rather than adherence to specific doctrines. This
existential and experiential understanding opened the door for appreciating
the religious depth of non-Christian traditions. Later, Paul Tillich would
develop a theology of culture that emphasized God’s presence in all aspects
of human experience, including non-Christian religious symbols and rituals.
 Eastern Orthodox Views on Religious Diversity
Modern Orthodox theologians have increasingly addressed religious diversity
in light of globalization and pluralism. Notable among them is Fr. Georges
Florovsky, who emphasized the necessity of returning to the Church Fathers
as the normative foundation for any theological development. He rejected
relativism but acknowledged the providential role that other religions might
play in the divine economy. The Orthodox Involvement in the World Council
of Churches and various interfaith dialogues also reflects a willingness to
engage with religious diversity constructively. While such participation
remains controversial in some circles, it demonstrates an openness to
cooperative efforts on moral, social, and ecological issues. The document
The Mission of the Orthodox Church in Today’s World, adopted by the Holy
and Great Council of the Orthodox Church (Crete, 2016), affirms the Church’s
commitment to peace and coexistence, emphasizing respect for human
dignity and freedom of conscience.
 Contemporary Theological Approaches to Other Religions
Contemporary theologians continue to develop frameworks that maintain
Christian integrity while embracing openness. Jacques Dupuis, a Jesuit
theologian, proposed a “theology of religious pluralism” that sees non-
Christian religions as part of God’s salvific plan. Amos Yong, a Pentecostal
theologian, explores interreligious dialogue through the lens of the Holy
Spirit, emphasizing pneumatology as a resource for understanding religious
diversity.
Nevertheless, the shift toward openness has not been without its critics.
Some theologians and church leaders argue that openness risks relativism or
theological compromise. They fear that downplaying the uniqueness of Christ
undermines the core of Christian proclamation. Others worry that interfaith
dialogue may become a substitute for evangelism or mission. These
concerns highlight the need for balance: openness should not entail
abandoning central Christian convictions but rather engaging others with a
spirit of humility and love.
 Interfaith Dialogue and Cooperation
In a world characterized by religious pluralism and increasing globalization,
interfaith dialogue and cooperation have become essential tools for fostering
mutual understanding, peace, and coexistence among diverse communities.
Interfaith dialogue refers to constructive and positive interaction between
people of different religious traditions, aiming to build relationships, deepen
understanding, and cooperate on shared values. It transcends theological
debates, focusing instead on areas of mutual concern, such as social justice,
human rights, and peacebuilding. This paper explores the history, principles,
significance, challenges, and future potential of interfaith dialogue and
cooperation.
Significance of Interfaith Dialogue and Cooperation
Interfaith dialogue holds immense significance in today’s world:
Peacebuilding and Conflict Resolution: Religious differences have often
been manipulated to fuel conflicts. Interfaith dialogue offers a platform for
diffusing tensions, correcting misconceptions, and promoting reconciliation.
For example, in regions like the Middle East and parts of Africa, interfaith
initiatives have been instrumental in promoting peace.
Promotion of Religious Literacy and Tolerance: By engaging with other
traditions, individuals can better understand their own beliefs and reduce
ignorance and prejudice. This fosters a culture of tolerance and pluralism.
Social and Humanitarian Cooperation: Interfaith coalitions often come
together to address global challenges such as poverty, education,
healthcare, and disaster relief. Organizations like Religions for Peace have
demonstrated how faith-based collaboration can lead to impactful
humanitarian outcomes.
Global Citizenship and Ethical Leadership: In an increasingly
interconnected world, interfaith dialogue prepares individuals for global
citizenship, encouraging ethical responsibility and cross-cultural
understanding.
 Factors Contributing to Positive Attitudes
Several interrelated factors have contributed to the development of more
positive attitudes towards other religions in the post-patristic era:
Theological Developments: As noted, inclusivist and pluralist theologies,
especially those emerging in the 20 th century, have reframed how
Christianity understands salvation, revelation, and the presence of truth in
other religions.
Interreligious Dialogue Movements: The Second Vatican Council (1962–
1965), particularly through documents such as Nostra Aetate, played a
seminal role in reshaping Catholic perspectives. Nostra Aetate recognized
the truths found in other religions and called for mutual understanding and
respect, especially with Judaism and Islam.
Globalization and Increased Religious Interaction: The modern era has
made religious pluralism an inescapable reality. In multicultural societies,
religious communities are compelled to coexist, cooperate, and often
collaborate on social issues. This environment has fostered empathy, mutual
learning, and positive engagement.
Academic Religious Studies: The rise of religious studies as a secular
academic discipline has encouraged critical yet appreciative approaches to
all religions. Scholars such as Wilfred Cantwell Smith emphasized
understanding religious faith as a lived human experience, rather than
judging it from a theological standpoint alone.
 Conclusion
The evolution of positive attitudes toward other religions since the era of the
early Church Fathers marks a significant development in Christian theological
and ecclesial thought. From the initial posture of defense and exclusivism,
the Christian tradition has, over centuries, cultivated increasingly inclusive
and dialogical approaches. While early Christian leaders such as Justin
Martyr, Tertullian, and Augustine framed religious others primarily in
opposition to Christian truth, later figures and movements especially from
the 20th century onward have sought to understand religious others as
partners in the search for truth and moral good. This transformation is not
merely the product of theological reflection, but also of historical necessity,
moral reckoning, and a renewed understanding of the Gospel’s call to love
and justice. In a world marked by religious plurality and deep cultural
interdependence, the Christian imperative toward positive interreligious
attitudes is both a moral and theological necessity.
Looking forward, the way ahead lies in deepening a theology of encounter
one that goes beyond mere tolerance or theoretical respect, and ventures
into mutual transformation, shared service, and spiritual solidarity. Such an
approach not only enriches Christian theology but also contributes
meaningfully to global peace and human flourishing.

Bibliography

Caputo, John D. The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event. Bloomington:

Rahner, Karl. Foundations of Christian Faith. New York: Crossroad, 1978.

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers.

Tillich, Paul. Theology of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.

Vatican II. Nostra Aetate. 1965.

Yong, Amos. The Spirit Poured Out on All Flesh: Pentecostalism and the
Possibility of Global Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005.

Newbigin, Lesslie. The Gospel in a Pluralist Society. Grand Rapids, MI:

Stillman, Norman A. The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book.
Jewish Publication Society, 1979.

Firestone, Reuven. Children of Abraham: An Introduction to Judaism for

Lewis, Bernard. The Jews of Islam. Princeton University Press, 1984.

Swidler, Leonard. Dialogue for Interreligious Understanding: Strategies for

Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. Nonviolence and Peace Building in Islam: Theory

Ware, Kallistos. The Orthodox Way. St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1995.

Ware, Kallistos. The Orthodox Church. Penguin Books, 1997.