Proposal - Wu (Commented by Peng)
Proposal - Wu (Commented by Peng)
Please ensure you read the Scheme Overview and Guidance Notes (Guidance Notes)
carefully before completing this form. Section 2 of the Guidance Notes mirrors the
application form structure, so will provide you with step-by-step advice on completion.
To safeguard the interests of the researcher and the university, the awardee university
bears the primary responsibility for prevention, detection and investigation of research
misconduct, including but not limited to misuse of funds, data falsification, plagiarism
and double-dipping. The university is strongly encouraged to vet the grant applications
using anti-plagiarism software before submitting them to the RGC.
(b) Is the PI a new appointee within 2 years of full-time paid appointment to his/her first
substantive position as an academic staff in a university at the time of submission of the
proposal?
Yes No
(c) Number of hours per week to be spent by the PI in the proposal: 15 hour(s)
(d) Title of Project: A high-fidelity numerical framework for simulating moving objects
with superhydrophobic surfaces and its application for biological self-propulsion
Page 1
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
* for project with duration exceeding 36 months, please explain in Part II (4) why the
proposed research cannot be completed within the normal span of 36 months.
(h) (i) If this is a re-submission or largely similar to a proposal that has been submitted to
but not supported by the UGC/RGC or another funding agency, or a continuation
application, please give details here:
Date(month/year) of application:
Outcome:
(ii) If this application is the same as or similar to the one(s) submitted but not supported
previously, what were the main concerns / suggestions of the reviewers and how have you
changed the project in response? Maximum of 500 words
Page 2
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
3) Biological self-propulsion
4) Computational fluid dynamics
5) Vortex dynamics
Page 3
ABSTRACT
Superhydrophobic surfaces, inspired by nature's lotus leaf, have gained attention as passive
biomimetic flow control methods. These surfaces can effectively reduce skin-friction drag in
both laminar and turbulent flow conditions. For next-generation autonomous underwater
vehicles (AUVs), the application of superhydrophobic coatings holds great potential for energy
conservation and emission reduction. These surfaces can be described using the Navier slip
model, where local shear rate determines slip velocity. This research proposal addresses the
complex challenges associated with simulating moving objects with superhydrophobic coatings
in fluid environments. Traditional computational fluid dynamics with body-fitted meshes
struggle to model the intricate interactions involving vortex dynamics, surface velocity slip,
solid objects' nonlinear vibrations, and large deformations. To tackle these challenges, we
propose the following novel numerical methodologies.
The proposal introduces a novel implicit boundary condition-enforced immersed boundary
method (IBM) that aims to accurately satisfy the Navier slip boundary condition on irregular
surfaces. This new IBM features full implicitness to precisely enforce the boundary condition
and utilizes interpolation and spreading schemes that do not compromise global accuracy. The
IBM achieves third-order spatial accuracy, preserving overall high-order accuracy.
The proposal couples the novel IBM with a high-order generalized differential quadrature-
lattice boltzmann flux solver (GDQ-LBFS) to construct a high-fidelity numerical framework.
The GDQ-LBFS ensures global spectral accuracy and evolves macroscopic equations directly.
This framework is used to simulate the interaction between the moving superhydrophobic
surfaces with the incompressible flow. It presents a novel approach for simulating the dynamic
responses of solid objects with superhydrophobic coating in fluid environments, crucial for
investigating the effects of superhydrophobic surfaces on natural swimmer propulsion.
In the project's third component, the proposal hybridizes the finite difference method (FDM)
with the novel high-fidelity numerical framework. This hybrid approach accurately captures
the dynamic responses of elastic slender structures, such as fish fins with superhydrophobic
coatings. By modeling large deformations, this component addresses the complex interactions
between flexible biological structures and the surrounding flow.
Moreover, this project plans to deploy the high-fidelity numerical framework to simulate
various physical and engineering problems, such as biological self-propulsion, autonomous
underwater vehicles (AUVs), and ship manufacturing technology. The effects of the
superhydrophobic surfaces on biological self-propulsion will be investigated, shedding light on
how superhydrophobic surfaces impact the hydrodynamic performance of natural swimmers.
The research findings will contribute to the design and optimization of next-generation AUVs
with superhydrophobic coatings, enhancing their energy efficiency and reducing emissions.
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
The PI, Dr. Buchen Wu, and Co-I, Prof. Lin Fu, will jointly manage the entire project,
including hiring postgraduate students with necessary background, monitoring the
budget, and guaranteeing the progress. More specifically, Dr. Wu will design the research
plan, develop the numerical algorithm as well as the corresponding code, present research
findings in internationally recognized conferences and publish research articles in
premier journals. In addition, Dr. Wu and Prof. Fu will supervise students and ensure
qualified journal publications with postgraduate students. Other activities include the
interaction with other groups/institutes and the training of undergraduate students or
Page 4
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
visiting fellows with shared interests.
Page 5
(i) Name: Dr. Buchen Wu
(vi) Publications:
Section A - Five most representative publications in the last five years
1. Buchen, Wu; Jinhua, Lu; HsuChew, Lee; Chang, Shu; Minping, Wan; An explicit
boundary condition-enforced immersed boundary-reconstructed thermal lattice
Boltzmann flux solver for thermal–fluid–structure interaction problems with heat flux
boundary conditions, Journal of Computational Physics, 485 (2023): 112106.
2. Buchen, Wu; Chang, Shu; Minping, Wan; An implicit immersed boundary method
for Robin boundary condition, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, (2023):
108694.
3. Buchen, Wu; Jinhua, Lu; HsuChew, Lee; Chang, Shu; Minping, Wan; An efficient
explicit immersed boundary-reconstructed lattice Boltzmann flux solver for isothermal
fluid-structure interaction problems with large deformations and complex geometries,
Applied Mathematical Modelling, 114 (2023): 627-645.
4. Buchen, Wu; Jinhua, Lu; HsuChew, Lee; Chang, Shu; Minping, Wan; An explicit
immersed boundary-reconstructed thermal lattice Boltzmann flux solver for thermal
fluid-structure interaction problems, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,
235 (2022): 107704.
5. Buchen, Wu; Chang, Shu; HsuChew, Lee; Minping, Wan; Numerical study on the
hydrodynamic performance of an unconstrained carangiform swimmer (Featured
article), Physics of Fluids, 34(12) (2022): 121902.
2019-2023
NUS Research Scholarship
National University of Singapore
2018
National scholarship
Chinese Ministry of Education
2016
National Encouragement scholarship
Chinese Ministry of Education
(i) Name: Dr. Lin Fu
(vi) Publications:
Section A - Five most representative publications in the last five years
1. Cheng, Cheng; Fu, Lin*; Linear-model-based study of the coupling between velocity
and temperature fields in compressible turbulent channel flows, Journal of Fluid
Mechanics, 964 (2023): A15.
2. Gao, Tianrun; Qiu, Huihe; Fu, Lin*; Multi-level adaptive particle refinement method
with large refinement scale ratio and new free-surface detection algorithm for complex
fluid-structure interaction problems, Journal of Computational Physics, 473 (2023):
111762.
3. Gao, Tianrun; Qiu, Huihe; Fu, Lin*; A Block-based Adaptive Particle Refinement
SPH Method for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems, Computer Methods in Applied
Mechanics and Engineering, 399 (2022): 115356.
4. Griffin, Kevin P.; Fu, Lin*; Moin, Parviz*; Velocity transformation for compressible
wall-bounded turbulent flows with and without heat transfer, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 118 (2021):
e2111144118.
5. Fu, Lin; Karp, Michael; Bose, Sanjeeb; Moin, Parviz; Urzay, Javier*; Shock-induced
heating and transition to turbulence in a hypersonic boundary layer, Journal of Fluid
Mechanics, 909 (2021): A8.
Section B - Five representative publications beyond the recent five-year
1. Fu, Lin; Hu, Xiangyu*; Adams, Nikolaus; A new class of adaptive high-order targeted
ENO schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics,
374 (2018): 724-751.
2. Fu, Lin; Hu, Xiangyu*; Adams, Nikolaus; Targeted ENO schemes with tailored
resolution property for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational
Physics, 349 (2017): 97-121.
3. Fu, Lin; Hu, Xiangyu*; Adams, Nikolaus; A physics-motivated Centroidal Voronoi
Particle domain decomposition method, Journal of Computational Physics, 335 (2017):
718-735.
4. Fu, Lin; Hu, Xiangyu*; Adams, Nikolaus; A novel partitioning method for block-
structured adaptive meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 341 (2017): 447-473.
5. Fu, Lin; Hu, Xiangyu*; Adams, Nikolaus; A family of high-order targeted ENO
schemes for compressible-fluid simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, 305
(2016): 333-359.
(vii) Patent:
1. Method and system for generating a mesh. Hu, Xiangyu; Fu, Lin (first author as a
Ph.D. student and major contributor); Han, Luhui; Adams, Nikolaus. International
Application No. PCT/EP2017/063328, Publication Number WO/2017/211684.
Page 6
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
PART II: DETAILS OF THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL
3. Project Objectives
Other Information
Page 7
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
4. Research Project Statement
(This is to be maximum of 10 A4 sides in Research Project Statement and should include
five elements)
(i) Research context, (ii) Research questions, and (iii) Research Methods
(iv) A one-page Project timetable / Gantt Chart showing the research activities
(v) A maximum of two non-text pages of attached diagrams, photos, charts and table etc,
if any.
6. Reference (a maximum of three pages for references is allowed for listing the
publications cited in Section 1-2. All full references should be provided, including all
authors of each reference.)
7. Output Dissemination Plan
Page 8
A Research context
Inspired by the lotus leaf, see Figure 1(a), superhydrophobic surfaces represent a passive
biomimetic flow control method for widespread application in reducing skin-friction drag
across laminar and turbulent flow regimes. For next-generation autonomous underwater vehicle,
the application of superhydrophobic coating holds significant promise for advancing energy
conservation and emissions reduction [1]. On a macroscopic scale, superhydrophobic surfaces
can be described by the Navier slip model depicted in Figure 1(b), where the slip velocity is
proportional to the local shear rate of fluid [2]. The successful and efficient design of next-
generation underwater vehicle with superhydrophobic coating relies heavily on the availability
of high-fidelity numerical simulation method capable of simulating the behavior of moving
objects with superhydrophobic coating in fluid environment. However, this necessitates the
deconstruction of the intricate interplay among factors, including surrounding vortex dynamics,
surface velocity slip, nonlinear vibrations of solid objects, and large deformations. These
complexities pose significant challenges for traditional computational fluid dynamics
approaches that rely on body-fitted meshes. Thus, the development of a robust and adaptable
numerical framework that comprehensively accounts for all these factors holds substantial
value for the scientific and engineering communities.
B Research question
B.1 Numerical and modeling challenges for high-fidelity prediction of moving objects with
superhydrophobic coating in fluid
Numerous numerical approaches have been proposed to accurately predict the behavior of
moving objects in a fluid environment. Typically, dynamic responses of solid objects are
addressed through Lagrangian-based methods, while flow behaviors are resolved using
Eulerian mesh-based techniques. The coupling between the solid and fluid domains plays a
pivotal role in simulating objects in motion within a fluid. Over the past few decades, various
methods, such as the arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) approach [3][4][5][6] and the
immersed boundary method (IBM) [7][8][9][10][11], have been developed to establish the
relationships between the solid and fluid phases. However, the ALE approach is associated with
certain drawbacks, such as the re-meshing process at every time step, which not only increases
computational time but also complicates implementation. Moreover, the ALE method relies on
high-quality unstructured body-fitted meshes for accurate solutions, demanding precise mesh
generation technology. Consequently, the ALE method is not suitable for simulating objects
with complex geometries in fluid environment. In contrast, IBM allows the exchange of
boundary information between solid domain and fluid domain, imposing various boundary
conditions at the interface between the solid and fluid phases. Consequently, IBM circumvents
the need for grid regeneration when simulating flexible structures or moving objects, making it
superior to conventional numerical methods in terms of efficiency. Thus, this project aims to
propose a more flexible and robust approach within the framework of the diffused interface
IBM.
However, the numerical methodology for simulating moving objects with superhydrophobic
surfaces differs significantly from those for objects with no-slip boundary conditions. Several
new challenges need to be addressed in developing a high-fidelity numerical approach for
predicting the mutual interaction between moving objects with superhydrophobic surfaces and
surrounding fluids. These challenges can be summarized as follows: (I) accurately modeling
the Navier slip boundary condition on solid surfaces with complex geometries, in which the
Navier slip boundary condition depends on the local tangential velocity gradient; (II)
addressing moving objects with extensive motion throughout the computational domain, which
poses a significant challenge for numerical methods based on body-fitted meshes; (III)
precisely modeling the interaction between solid deformations and surrounding flow behaviors;
(IV) constructing a high-order accuracy numerical framework for coupling solid and fluid
solvers. In the traditional IBM framework, first-order accuracy discrete delta functions are
employed in the interpolating and spreading processes, causing accuracy degradation effects on
the overall accuracy of the numerical framework. The development of a high-order accuracy
numerical framework requires to propose novel interpolation and spreading schemes for the
IBM.
𝑙𝑠 ∗ 𝑙𝑠 𝜏 ∗ 𝑙𝑠 𝑙𝑠
(1 + ) 𝐮𝜏𝐵 − 𝐮𝑂 = 𝑂
(∑ 𝑤𝑝𝑞 𝐵
(∑ 𝑤𝑞𝑝 𝛿𝐮𝜏𝐵 )) − (1 + ) (∑ 𝑤𝑝𝑞
𝐵 𝐵
(∑ 𝑤𝑞𝑝 𝛿𝐮𝜏𝐵 )) .
𝑑𝑂 𝑑𝑂 𝑑𝑂 𝑑𝑂
𝑞 𝑝 𝑞 𝑝
.
The velocity corrections on Eulerian points can be obtained by spreading the velocity
corrections on the Lagrangian points. In the following section C.2, we demonstrate that this
novel IBM can achieve high-order spatial accuracy and has great potential to simulate complex
problems of moving objects with superhydrophobic coating in fluid.
C.2 Development of high-fidelity numerical framework by coupling this novel IBM with
the high-order generalized differential quadrature-lattice Boltzmann flux solver
(Addressing challenge IV)
While the novel IBM without accuracy degradation is proposed, constructing a high-fidelity
numerical framework requires a high-order flow solver. Therefore, this project adopts the high-
order generalized differential quadrature-lattice Boltzmann flux solver (GDQ-LBFS) to
simulate the incompressible flow [49]. There are three reasons for choosing this numerical
solver: (i) its ability to preserve global spectral accuracy, (ii) direct evolution of recovered
macroscopic equations without the need for storing density distribution functions, and (iii)
simultaneous evaluation of viscous and inviscid fluxes through local lattice Boltzmann equation
(LBE) reconstruction. Though Chapman–Enskog (C-E) expansion analysis, the governing
equations of LBFS (the macroscopic form) recovered from LBE can be written as:
∂𝜌 𝑒𝑞 ∂𝜌𝐮 𝑒𝑞 1 𝑛𝑒𝑞
+ ∇ ⋅ (∑ 𝑓𝛼 𝐞𝛼 ) = 0, + ∇ ⋅ (∑ [𝑓𝛼 + (1 − ) 𝑓𝛼 ] 𝐞𝛼𝛽 𝐞𝛼𝛾 ) = 0,
∂𝑡 ∂𝑡 2𝜏
𝛼 𝛼
𝑒𝑞 𝑛𝑒𝑞
where 𝑓𝛼 , 𝑓𝛼 and 𝐞𝛼 denote the equilibrium distribution function, the nonequilibrium
distribution function and the particle velocity along the 𝛼 th direction, respectively. The
governing equations can recover the Navier-Stokes equations. In the GDQ-LBFS, the high-
order GDQ framework is used for spatial discretization. In one-dimensional space, based on the
functional values 𝑓𝑗 = 𝑓(𝑥𝑗 ) , the first and second-order derivatives of 𝑓(𝑥𝑗 ) can be
approximately evaluated by the polynomial-based GDQ method [50][51] as follows:
𝑀(1) (𝑥𝑖 )
𝐾+1 , 𝑖 ≠ 𝑗,
∂𝑓 (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑥𝑗 )𝑀(1) (𝑥𝑗 )
𝑓 ′ (𝑥𝑖 ) = | ≈ ∑ 𝑎𝑖,𝑗 𝑓𝑗 , 𝑖 = 0,1, … , 𝐾 + 1; 𝑎𝑖,𝑗 = 𝐾+1
∂𝑥 𝑥𝑖
𝑗=0 − ∑ 𝑎𝑖,𝑘 , 𝑖 = 𝑗,
{ 𝑘=0,𝑘≠𝑖
1
𝐾+1 2𝑎𝑖,𝑗 (𝑎𝑖,𝑖 − ) , 𝑖 ≠ 𝑗,
2
∂ 𝑓 𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑥𝑗
𝑓 ′′ (𝑥𝑖 ) = 2 | ≈ ∑ 𝑏𝑖,𝑗 𝑓𝑗 , 𝑖 = 0,1, … , 𝐾 + 1; 𝑏𝑖,𝑗 = 𝐾+1
∂𝑥 𝑥
𝑖 𝑗=0 − ∑ 𝑏𝑖,𝑘 , 𝑖 = 𝑗,
{ 𝑘=0,𝑘≠𝑖
where 𝑀(1) (𝑥𝑘 ) = ∏𝐾+1𝑚=0,𝑚≠𝑘 (𝑥𝑘 − 𝑥𝑚 ). For multi-dimensional problems, the GDQ method
∂𝐪
can be extended as the tensor product of 1D equations. Considering this conservation law +
∂𝑡
∇ ⋅ 𝐅 = 0 as an example, the semi-discretized forms of 3D conservation laws can be written as:
𝐾+1 𝐾+1 𝐾+1
̂𝑖𝑗𝑘
𝑑𝐪 −1
= −𝐽𝑖𝑗𝑘 (∑ 𝑎𝑖,𝑙 𝐅̂̃𝜉,𝑙𝑗𝑘 + ∑ 𝑎𝑗,𝑚 𝐅̂̃𝜂,𝑖𝑚𝑘 + ∑ 𝑎𝑘,𝑛 𝐅̂̃𝜁,𝑖𝑗𝑛 ) , 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑘 = 1,2, … , 𝐾,
𝑑𝑡
𝑙=0 𝑚=0 𝑛=0
where 𝐪, 𝐅 and 𝐽−1 dente the conserved variable, flux function and the inverse of the Jacobian
matrix determinant, respectively. The numerical flux 𝐅 can be evaluated by the local LBE
reconstruction (the equilibrium and non-equilibrium distribution functions) as follows:
𝑒𝑞 𝐞𝛼 ⋅ 𝐮 (𝐞𝛼 ⋅ 𝐮)2 − (𝑐𝑠 |𝐮|)2
𝑓𝛼 (𝐱, 𝑡) = 𝜌𝑤𝛼 [1 + 2 + ],
𝑐𝑠 2𝑐𝑠4
𝑛𝑒𝑞 𝑒𝑞 𝑒𝑞
𝑓𝛼 (𝐱, 𝑡) = −𝜏[𝑓𝛼 (𝐱, 𝑡) − 𝑓𝛼 (𝐱 − 𝐞𝛼 𝛿𝑡, 𝑡 − 𝛿𝑡)] + 𝒪(𝛿𝑡 2 ).
To assess the accuracy of this novel high-fidelity numerical framework, which couples the
novel IBM and the high-order generalized differential quadrature-lattice Boltzmann flux solver,
a pilot study involving flow around a stationary circular cylinder with superhydrophobic
coating is conducted. As shown in Figure 5, the normal velocity components are effectively
suppressed to satisfy the impermeability boundary condition. Furthermore, the tangential
velocity components calculated by this novel numerical framework exhibit strong agreement
with those derived from the Navier slip model. Note that the velocity errors in both normal and
tangential directions are confined to 𝒪(ℎ3 ), demonstrating that this novel numerical framework
achieves third-order spatial accuracy. In contrast to traditional diffuse interface IBMs, this novel
IBM maintains an overall high-order accuracy level.
C.3 Hybrid the finite difference method (FDM) with this novel high-fidelity numerical
framework to accurately capture the dynamic responses of elastic slender structures
(Addressing challenge III)
In this project, the applicant plans to investigate the effects of superhydrophobic surfaces on
the propulsion of natural swimmers. The swimmer’s fins play a crucial role in the self-
propulsion, such as modulating wake vortex configurations, promoting propulsive speed and
efficiency and enhancing wake symmetry preserving ability [52][53]. To model the dynamic
interaction between the three-dimensional flexible fish fins with superhydrophobic coating and
the surrounding flow field, it is crucial to accurately predict the large deformations of these fins.
Given the elastic and slender nature of fish fins, a three-dimensional flexible plate is employed
to represent them, and the governing equations can be written as:
2
∂2 𝐗 ∂ ∂𝐗 ∂2 2
𝑏 ∂ 𝐗
𝜌𝑠 2 = ∑ [ (𝜎𝑖𝑗 )− (𝑘 )] + 𝑭𝐻 ,
∂𝑡 ∂𝑠𝑖 ∂𝑠𝑗 ∂𝑠𝑖 ∂𝑠𝑗 𝑖𝑗 ∂𝑠𝑖 ∂𝑠𝑗
𝑖,𝑗=1
𝑏
where 𝜌𝑠 and 𝑘𝑖𝑗 denote the area density of the 3D flexible plate and bending or twisting
∂𝐗 ∂𝐗 1, if 𝑖 = 𝑗
coefficients. 𝜎𝑖𝑗 is defined as 𝜎𝑖𝑗 = 𝜑𝑖𝑗 ( ⋅ − 𝑇𝑖𝑗0 ), where 𝑇𝑖𝑗0 = { is the initial
∂𝑠𝑖 ∂𝑠𝑗 0, if 𝑖 ≠ 𝑗
unstretched condition and 𝜑𝑖𝑗 is the tension or shearing coefficients. 𝑭𝐻 denotes the
hydrodynamic forces exerted on the plate, which can be evaluated by the restoring forcing term
in IBM. The 3D flexible plate can be simplified as several parallel flexible filaments along the
streamwise direction, and these filaments are connected along the spanwise direction. Therefore,
the force components along the streamwise direction are internal force terms and the other force
terms are regarded as external force terms 𝑭𝑒𝑥 . A predicted position 𝐗 ∗ = 2𝐗 𝑛 − 𝐗 𝑛−1 is
introduced to simplify the process of updating the position.
∂𝐗 ∂𝐗
With the inextensibility condition ∙ = 1, the tension stress can be obtained by the
∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1
Poisson equation as follows:
∂𝐗 ∂2 ∂𝐗
⋅ 2 (𝑇 )
∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1
1 ∂2 ∂𝐗 ∂𝐗 ∂2 𝐗 ∂2 𝐗 ∂𝐗 ∂ ∂2 𝐵
∂2 𝐗
= ( ⋅ ) − 𝜌𝑠 ⋅ − ⋅ [ (𝑘 ) + 𝑭𝐻 + 𝑭𝑒𝑥 ].
2 ∂𝑡 2 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑡 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠12 11 ∂𝑠12
Based on the tension force, the updated position can be solved by the second-order finite
difference scheme as:
𝐗 𝑛+1 − 2𝐗 𝑛 + 𝐗 𝑛−1 ∂ 𝑛+2 ∂𝐗
1 𝑛+1
∂2 ∂2 𝐗 ∗
= (𝑇 𝐵
) − 2 (𝑘11 ) + 𝑭𝑒𝑥 (𝐗 ∗ ) + 𝑭𝑛𝐻 .
Δ𝑡 2 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠1 ∂𝑠12
The proposed project mainly involves two research stages and will take three years in total.
During the first stage, the development of the high-fidelity numerical method will be conducted.
During the second stage, the biological self-propulsion of natural swimmer with
superhydrophobic surfaces will be investigated by the developed high-fidelity numerical
method. The time schedule is shown as below.
superhydrophobic surfaces
immersed boundary
method for
superhydrophobic
surfaces
2PG
Figure 2: (a) The instantaneous vortical structures around the 3D flexible plate, where a
hairpin-like structure is accurately captured in the wake region, see [41]; The (b) drag
coefficient and (c) lift coefficient of the 3D flexible plate, accurately depicting the nonlinear
dynamic characteristics of the 3D flexible plate, see [41][42]. These published papers signify
our comprehensive studies of modeling techniques for moving objects in incompressible
flow.
Figure 3: The instantaneous vorticity field around the self-propulsive carangiform swimmer
with the flexible caudal fin at different bending stiffnesses, see [47]. These preliminary studies
showcase our extensive experience in addressing biological self-propulsion problems.
Figure 4: (a) Sketch of flow past an irregular bluff body with superhydrophobic surfaces. (b)
Schematic of the novel implicit boundary condition-enforced immersed boundary method for
Navier slip boundary conditions.
Figure 5: (a) The distribution of instantaneous tangential velocity on the circular surface, where
the numerical results agree well with the Navier’s slip model. (b) The tangential velocity errors
on the circular surface are within 𝒪(ℎ3 ), with ℎ = 10−2 . (c) The distribution of instantaneous
normal velocity on the circular surface, where the impermeability boundary condition is
accurately satisfied. These preliminary results indicate that the novel IBM can achieve
high-order spatial accuracy.
Figure 6: (a) The 3D profile of the Robot Tuna. (b) 3D vortical structures around the 3D bionic
fish from a perspective view, (c) side view, and (d) top view. These preliminary results
demonstrate our capability to investigate complex biological self-propulsion problems
involving superhydrophobic surfaces.
Pathways to Impact Statement
The problem of drag reduction has been a key issue that has long been concerned by the
scientific and engineering communities, and has an important impact on both civil and military
engineering. Superhydrophobic surfaces, as a passive drag reduction strategy inspired by the
water-repellent properties of many surfaces in nature, have been widely used for drag reduction
in both laminar and turbulent flow regimes. However, existing numerical approaches are mostly
developed with body-fitted meshes for stationary objects with superhydrophobic surfaces, and
cannot be extended to investigate the moving superhydrophobic boundaries.
To advance the CFD-based flow prediction capability in flow problems with moving
superhydrophobic surfaces, based on the inverse distance weighting interpolation scheme, a
novel implicit boundary condition-enforced immersed boundary method will be proposed. The
boundary errors can be accurately eliminated by the proposed IBM scheme, and the interactions
between the superhydrophobic surfaces and surrounding fluids can be accurately captured.
Comparing with the traditional numerical methods, this novel IBM scheme will greatly promote
the computational efficiency and reduce the computational complexity in simulating moving
superhydrophobic surfaces. Moreover, this novel IBM scheme will be integrated with the high-
order flow solver based on the skew-symmetric splitting scheme to form a high-fidelity scale-
resolving numerical framework.
This new high-fidelity scale-resolving numerical framework will allow researchers and
engineers to investigate the drag reduction performance of superhydrophobic surfaces in a wide
domain of fluid problems. In the following sections, we will describe how this work will make
impacts outside of the academic community.
[1] Samaha, M. A., Tafreshi, H. V., & Gad-el-Hak, M. (2012). Superhydrophobic surfaces:
From the lotus leaf to the submarine. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 340(1-2), 18-34.
[2] Rothstein, J. P. (2010). Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces. Annual review of fluid
mechanics, 42, 89-109.
[3] Hirt, C. W., Amsden, A. A., & Cook, J. L. (1974). An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian
computing method for all flow speeds. Journal of computational physics, 14(3), 227-253.
[4] Donea, J., Giuliani, S., & Halleux, J. P. (1982). An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite
element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Computer methods in
applied mechanics and engineering, 33(1-3), 689-723.
[5] Andersen, A., Pesavento, U., & Wang, Z. J. (2005). Unsteady aerodynamics of fluttering
and tumbling plates. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 541, 65-90.
[6] Jin, C., & Xu, K. (2008). Numerical study of the unsteady aerodynamics of freely falling
plates. Communications in Computational Physics, 3(4), 834-851.
[7] Mittal, R., & Iaccarino, G. (2005). Immersed boundary methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,
37, 239-261.
[8] Sotiropoulos, F., & Yang, X. (2014). Immersed boundary methods for simulating fluid–
structure interaction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 65, 1-21.
[9] Huang, W. X., & Tian, F. B. (2019). Recent trends and progress in the immersed boundary
method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of
Mechanical Engineering Science, 233(23-24), 7617-7636.
[10] Mittal, R., & Bhardwaj, R. (2021). Immersed boundary methods for thermofluids
problems. Annual Review of Heat Transfer, 24.
[11] Verzicco, R. (2023). Immersed boundary methods: Historical perspective and future
outlook. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 55, 129-155.
[12] Long, T., Hu, D., Wan, D., Zhuang, C., & Yang, G. (2017). An arbitrary boundary with
ghost particles incorporated in coupled FEM–SPH model for FSI problems. Journal of
Computational Physics, 350, 166-183.
[13] Long, T., Yang, P., & Liu, M. (2020). A novel coupling approach of smoothed finite
element method with SPH for thermal fluid structure interaction problems. International
Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 174, 105558.
[14] Long, T., Huang, C., Hu, D., & Liu, M. (2021). Coupling edge-based smoothed finite
element method with smoothed particle hydrodynamics for fluid structure interaction
problems. Ocean Engineering, 225, 108772.
[15] Long, T., Zhang, Z., & Liu, M. (2021). Multi-resolution technique integrated with
smoothed particle element method (SPEM) for modeling fluid-structure interaction
problems with free surfaces. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 64(8),
284711.
[16] Peskin, C. S. (1977). Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. Journal of
computational physics, 25(3), 220-252.
[17] Beyer, R. P., & LeVeque, R. J. (1992). Analysis of a one-dimensional model for the
immersed boundary method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 29(2), 332-364.
[18] Lai, M. C., & Peskin, C. S. (2000). An immersed boundary method with formal second-
order accuracy and reduced numerical viscosity. Journal of computational Physics, 160(2),
705-719.
[19] Wang, L., Currao, G. M., Han, F., Neely, A. J., Young, J., & Tian, F. B. (2017). An
immersed boundary method for fluid–structure interaction with compressible multiphase
flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 346, 131-151.
[20] Ma, J., Wang, Z., Young, J., Lai, J. C., Sui, Y., & Tian, F. B. (2020). An immersed
boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interaction problems involving
viscoelastic fluids and complex geometries. Journal of Computational Physics, 415,
109487.
[21] Wang, L., Tian, F. B., & Lai, J. C. (2020). An immersed boundary method for fluid–
structure–acoustics interactions involving large deformations and complex geometries.
Journal of Fluids and Structures, 95, 102993.
[22] Mohd-Yusof, J. (1997). For simulations of flow in complex geometries. Annual research
briefs, 317, 35.
[23] Fadlun, E. A., Verzicco, R., Orlandi, P., & Mohd-Yusof, J. (2000). Combined immersed-
boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations.
Journal of computational physics, 161(1), 35-60.
[24] Uhlmann, M. (2005). An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation
of particulate flows. Journal of computational physics, 209(2), 448-476.
[25] Luo, K., Wang, Z., Fan, J., & Cen, K. (2007). Full-scale solutions to particle-laden flows:
Multidirect forcing and immersed boundary method. Physical Review E, 76(6), 066709.
[26] Wang, Z., Fan, J., & Luo, K. (2008). Combined multi-direct forcing and immersed
boundary method for simulating flows with moving particles. International journal of
multiphase flow, 34(3), 283-302.
[27] Kang, S. K., & Hassan, Y. A. (2011). A comparative study of direct‐forcing immersed
boundary‐lattice Boltzmann methods for stationary complex boundaries. International
Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 66(9), 1132-1158.
[28] Kempe, T., & Fröhlich, J. (2012). An improved immersed boundary method with direct
forcing for the simulation of particle laden flows. Journal of Computational Physics,
231(9), 3663-3684.
[29] Goldstein, D., Handler, R., & Sirovich, L. (1993). Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with
an external force field. Journal of computational physics, 105(2), 354-366.
[30] Zhu, L., He, G., Wang, S., Miller, L., Zhang, X., You, Q., & Fang, S. (2011). An immersed
boundary method based on the lattice Boltzmann approach in three dimensions, with
application. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 61(12), 3506-3518.
[31] Huang, Q., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Ravi, S., Young, J., Lai, J., & Tian, F. B. (2022). Streamline
penetration, velocity error, and consequences of the feedback immersed boundary method.
Physics of Fluids, 34(9).
[32] Niu, X. D., Shu, C., Chew, Y. T., & Peng, Y. (2006). A momentum exchange-based
immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for simulating incompressible viscous
flows. Physics Letters A, 354(3), 173-182.
[33] Chen, Y., Cai, Q., Xia, Z., Wang, M., & Chen, S. (2013). Momentum-exchange method
in lattice Boltzmann simulations of particle-fluid interactions. Physical Review E, 88(1),
013303.
[34] Wu, J., & Shu, C. (2009). Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice
Boltzmann method and its applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(6), 1963-
1979.
[35] Wang, Y., Shu, C., Teo, C. J., & Wu, J. (2015). An immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann
flux solver and its applications to fluid–structure interaction problems. Journal of Fluids
and Structures, 54, 440-465.
[36] Ren, W. W., Shu, C., Wu, J., & Yang, W. M. (2012). Boundary condition-enforced
immersed boundary method for thermal flow problems with Dirichlet temperature
condition and its applications. Computers & Fluids, 57, 40-51.
[37] Wang, Y., Shu, C., Teo, C. J., & Yang, L. M. (2016). An efficient immersed boundary-
lattice Boltzmann flux solver for simulation of 3D incompressible flows with complex
geometry. Computers & Fluids, 124, 54-66.
[38] Xu, L., Tian, F. B., Young, J., & Lai, J. C. (2018). A novel geometry-adaptive Cartesian
grid based immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method for fluid–structure interactions
at moderate and high Reynolds numbers. Journal of Computational Physics, 375, 22-56.
[39] Chen, Z., Shu, C., & Tan, D. (2018). Immersed boundary-simplified lattice Boltzmann
method for incompressible viscous flows. Physics of Fluids, 30(5).
[40] Zhao, X., Chen, Z., Yang, L., Liu, N., & Shu, C. (2021). Efficient boundary condition-
enforced immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with moving boundaries.
Journal of Computational Physics, 441, 110425.
[41] Wu, B., Lu, J., Lee, H., Shu, C., & Wan, M. (2023). An efficient explicit immersed
boundary-reconstructed lattice Boltzmann flux solver for isothermal fluid-structure
interaction problems with large deformations and complex geometries. Applied
Mathematical Modelling, 114, 627-645.
[42] Wu, B., Lu, J., Lee, H., Shu, C., & Wan, M. (2022). An explicit immersed boundary-
reconstructed thermal lattice Boltzmann flux solver for thermal–fluid-structure interaction
problems. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 235, 107704.
[43] Wu, B., Lu, J., Lee, H., Shu, C., & Wan, M. (2023). An explicit boundary condition-
enforced immersed boundary-reconstructed thermal lattice Boltzmann flux solver for
thermal–fluid–structure interaction problems with heat flux boundary conditions. Journal
of Computational Physics, 485, 112106.
[44] Wang, Z., He, Q., & Huang, J. (2021). The immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method
for solving solid-fluid interaction problem with Navier-slip boundary condition.
Computers & Fluids, 217, 104839.
[45] Wu, B., Shu, C., & Wan, M. (2023). An implicit immersed boundary method for Robin
boundary condition. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 108694.
[46] Wu, B., Shu, C., Lee, H., & Wan, M. (2022). Numerical study on the hydrodynamic
performance of an unconstrained carangiform swimmer. Physics of Fluids, 34(12).
[47] Wu, B., Shu, C., Lee, H., & Wan, M. (2022). The effects of caudal fin's bending stiffness
on a self-propelled carangiform swimmer. Physics of Fluids, 34(4).
[48] Wu, B., Shu, C., Wan, M., Wang, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). Hydrodynamic performance of
an unconstrained flapping swimmer with flexible fin: A numerical study. Physics of Fluids,
34(1).
[49] Liu, Y., Shu, C., Yu, P., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Lu, C. (2023). A high-order generalized
differential quadrature method with lattice Boltzmann flux solver for simulating
incompressible flows. Physics of Fluids, 35(4).
[50] Shu, C., & Richards, B. E. (1992). Application of generalized differential quadrature to
solve two‐dimensional incompressible Navier‐Stokes equations. International Journal for
Numerical Methods in Fluids, 15(7), 791-798.
[51] Shu, C. (2000). Differential quadrature and its application in engineering. Springer Science
& Business Media.
[52] Xin, Z., & Wu, C. (2012). Numerical simulations and vorticity dynamics of self-propelled
swimming of 3D bionic fish. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 55, 272-
283.
[53] Wu, J., & Shu, C. (2012). Simulation of three‐dimensional flows over moving objects by
an improved immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method. International journal for
numerical methods in fluids, 68(8), 977-1004.
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
8. Declaration of Time Commitment, Grant Record and Related Research Work of
Investigator(s)
If the number declared in (i) exceeds three or the number declared in (ii) exceeds two,
please provide the following information:
(i)completed research work funded from all sources (irrespective of whether from
UGC/RGC) in the past five years;
(ii)on-going research work funded from all sources (irrespective of whether from
UGC/RGC);
(iii)proposals pending funding approval (irrespective of whether submitted to
UGC/RGC);
Complete the first table for the PI then any Co-Is should be detailed in the second table
listed in the order listed above.
________________________________
¹ Research projects funded from all sources (irrespective of whether from UGC/RGC) should be included,
except those funded under the joint research schemes and the fellowship schemes administered by the RGC.
Projects for which completion reports have yet to be submitted by the application deadline of the current
GRF exercise should also be counted.
Page 9
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
If the PI / Co-I(s) are aware of any other work related to this research project outside the
5 year period covered above and irrespective of whether it was/is funded by the UGC or
the RGC, please state what distinguishes this project from that work.
Page 10
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
PART III: PROJECT FUNDING and RESOURCES
Types
19,000 * 2 * 12 456,000
19,000 * 2 * 12 456,000
19,000 * 2 * 12 456,000
Justification:
This project needs two Research Postgraduate Students under the supervision of the PI
and Co-I. One will work on the development of novel high-fidelity numerical framework
for simulating moving objects with superhydrophobic surfaces for three years. The other
will work on this project for biological self-propulsion. Both of them will write and
publish journal papers.
Justification:
Page 12
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
Justification:
Justification:
The budget will be used for (i) paper publication fees and (ii) an oversea visit to other
university for research collaboration.
Page 13
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
and applied mathematics.
Justification:
The PI and the students will attend the international conferences relevant to
computational fluid dynamics, fluid mechanics and applied mathematics.
Rank
Justification:
PI’s Current Average Teaching Load: Total 0 courses per academic year [UGC-funded
programmes only]
Justification:
Justification:
Page 14
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
Justification:
OR
OR
Page 15
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
OR
OR
OR
OR
Page 16
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
of 500 words)
OR
OR
Page 17
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
10. Existing Facilities and Major Equipment available for this Research Project:
(a maximum of 400 words)
At the central facilities, HKUST
• HPC3 cluster: The HPC3 cluster is an in-house designed high performance computing
(HPC) facility at HKUST set up in May 2020. As of Sep 2021, it has 165 CPU compute
nodes and 25 GPU compute nodes which are InfiniBand (IB) connected at 100 Gbit/s with
2PB raw disk storage. The total number of CPU cores and GPU cards are 7412 and 230
respectively.
• NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD system: 512 H800 GPUs, high-speed interconnects, and a
high-performance data storage system.
The above computing facilities from our university are sufficient for this project.
Page 18
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
11. Funds Secured or to be Secured
(a) Other research funds already secured for this research proposal:
[This amount will be deducted from the total cost of the project in Part III Section 9
above.]
(b) Other research funds to be or are being sought for this research proposal.
[If funds under this item are secured, the amount of the GRF to be awarded may be
reduced]:
Page 19
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
(i) I confirm that the research involves / does not involve human
proposal subjects.
(ii) I confirm that the research involves / does not involve the study of
proposal artefacts.
(iii) Please tick in the appropriate boxes to confirm if approval for the respective ethics
and/or safety issues is required and has been / is being obtained from the PI’s university.
PIs are encouraged to seek necessary approval (except for human research ethics
(clinical)) before application deadlines.
(iv) If approval is required by other authorities, please indicate below the names of the
authorities and the prospects of obtaining such approval. If not applicable, please put
down "N.A.".
N.A.
Page 20
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
(i) Is access to Government / official / private data and records critical to the research
project?
Yes
No
If approval is required, please indicate below the names of the agency(ies) of obtaining
such approval.
(ii) Please tick in the appropriate boxes to confirm if approval for access to the related
data/records has been / is being obtained from the relevant agency(ies). If approval has
been obtained, please provide evidence.
Page 21
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
14. Project Data
(i) Is the proposed project likely to generate data set(s) of retention value?
Yes No
If yes, please describe the nature, quantity and potential use of the data set(s) in future.
Nil
(ii) Are you willing to make the data set(s) available to others for reference twelve
months after the publication of research results or the completion of this proposed
project?
Yes No
I understand that the RGC will release the completion report to the public and only
considers data archiving requests after the completion of the RGC-funded project. The
RGC has full discretion in funding the archiving requests. Data sets archived with RGC
funds will require users to acknowledge the originator and the RGC. The originator will
also be provided with copies of all publications derived from the use of the data.
I undertake to include in the project completion report the URL links to the university’s
repository or the publishers’ websites so that the public could have quick and easy access
to the manuscripts or journal articles. I will also consider to include in the research
completion report the data repository where research data of the project could be
accessed and shared, where appropriate.
(i)I will check whether the publisher already allows (A) full open access to the publisher's
version, or (B) my depositing a copy of the paper (either the publisher's version or the
final accepted manuscript after peer-review) in the university's repository for open
access;
(ii)if both (i) (A) and (B) are not allowed, I will request the publisher to allow me to place
either version in my university's repository for restricted access immediately upon
publication or after an embargo period of up to twelve months if required by the
publisher; and
(iii)subject to the publisher's agreement on (i) or (ii) above, I will deposit a copy of the
publication in my university's repository as early as possible but no later
than six months after publication or the embargo period, if any.
Page 22
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
PART V: ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS
Appendix 1: Education Plan
Page 23
EDUCATION PLAN
The PI, Dr. Buchen Wu, and Co-I, Prof. Lin Fu, will jointly manage the entire project, including
hiring postgraduate students with necessary background, monitoring the budget, and
guaranteeing the progress. More specifically, Dr. Wu will design the research plan, develop the
numerical algorithm as well as the corresponding code, present research findings in
internationally recognized conferences and publish research articles in premier journals. In
addition, Dr. Wu and Prof. Fu will supervise students and ensure qualified journal publications
with postgraduate students. Other activities include the interaction with other groups/institutes
and the training of undergraduate students or visiting fellows with shared interests.
GRF1
RGC Ref No. 16214624
PART VI: UNDERTAKING OF THE PI
Page 24