Satellite Communications 2nd Ed 2nd Timothy Pratt Charles W Bostian PDF Download
Satellite Communications 2nd Ed 2nd Timothy Pratt Charles W Bostian PDF Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/satellite-communications-2nd-
ed-2nd-timothy-pratt-charles-w-bostian-22893830
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-satellite-communication-ground-
segment-and-earth-station-handbook-2nd-ed-bruce-elbert-5769056
https://ebookbell.com/product/satellite-communications-2nd-edition-
timothy-pratt-charles-w-bostian-23266928
https://ebookbell.com/product/mobile-satellite-communications-
handbook-2nd-edition-roger-cochetti-4767664
https://ebookbell.com/product/satellite-communications-payload-and-
system-wiley-ieee-2nd-edition-teresa-m-braun-33947110
Mobile Satellite Communications Principles And Trends 2nd Richharia
Madhavendra
https://ebookbell.com/product/mobile-satellite-communications-
principles-and-trends-2nd-richharia-madhavendra-4671600
https://ebookbell.com/product/global-mobile-satellite-communications-
theory-for-maritime-land-and-aeronautical-applications-2nd-edition-
stoje-dimov-ilev-auth-5675182
https://ebookbell.com/product/global-mobile-satellite-communications-
applications-for-maritime-land-and-aeronautical-applications-
volume-2-2nd-edition-stojce-dimov-ilcev-auth-6791160
https://ebookbell.com/product/dispute-settlement-in-the-area-of-space-
communication-volume-02-2nd-luxembourg-workshop-on-space-and-
satellite-communication-law-mahulena-hofmann-50671912
https://ebookbell.com/product/commercial-space-technologies-and-
applications-communication-remote-sensing-gps-and-meteorological-
satellites-2nd-mohammad-razani-9964940
This Wiley Student Edition is part of a continuing
program of paperbound textbooks especially designed
for students in developing countries at a reduced price.
Second Edition
THIS BOOK IS FOR SALE ONLY IN THE COUNTRY TO
Pratt
WHICH IT IS FIRST CONSIGNED BY WILEY INDIA
PVT. LTD. AND SHOULD NOT BE
Bostian
RE-EXPORTED. Allnutt
SATELLITE
FOR SALE ONLY IN :
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
INDIA, BANGLADESH, NEPAL, PAKISTAN, SRI
LANKA AND BHUTAN
www.wileyindia.com
ISBN978-93-88991-29-2
eISBN: 938899129-X
SECOND
EDITION
Wiley India Pvt. Ltd.
Customer Care +91 120 6291100
[email protected]
www.wileyindia.com
9 789388 991292
www.wiley.com
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page i
Satellite
Communications
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page ii
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page iii
Satellite
Communications
Second Edition
Timothy Pratt
Charles W. Bostian
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Jeremy E. Allnutt
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
George Mason University
Authorized reprint by Wiley India Pvt. Ltd., 4436/7, Ansari Road, Daryaganj,
New Delhi – 110002.
Copyright © 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
All rights reserved. AUTHORIZED REPRINT OF THE EDITION PUBLISHED
BY JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. No part of this book may be reproduced in any
form without the written permission of the publisher.
Limits of Liability/ Disclaimer of Warranty: The publisher and the author make
no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of
the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without
limitation warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be
created or extended by sales or promotional materials. The advice and strategies
contained herein may not be suitable for every situation. This work is sold with the
understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting,
or other professional services. If professional assistance is required, the services of
a competent professional person should be sought. Neither the publisher nor the
author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. The fact that an organization
or website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of
further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the
information the organization or website may provide or recommendations it may
make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet websites listed in this work
may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it
is read.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that
appears in print may not be available in electronic books. For more information
about Wiley products, visit our website at: www.wiley.com.
ISBN: 978-81-265-0833-4
Dedication
To our wives: Maggie, Frieda, and Norma
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page vi
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page vii
Timothy Pratt is a professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer En-
gineering at Virginia Tech, where he has been a faculty member since 1981. He received
his B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Birmingham,
United Kingdom, and has taught communications subjects in the United Kingdom and the
United States. His research interests are in satellite communications, position location,
and avionics. Dr. Pratt is a senior member of the IEEE and a member of the IEE (London).
vii
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page viii
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page ix
PREFACE
There have been many new developments in satellite communications technology since
the first edition of this text was published in 1986. However, the underlying principles of
the transmission of radio signals via satellites remain the same. Thus the basic material
in the textbook relating to satellite orbits, look angles, transponders on communications
satellites, link budget calculations, SN and BER for analog and digital links, multiple
access techniques, error control, and the propagation of radio waves through the earth’s
atmosphere remains as important now as in 1986. What has changed is that new applica-
tions have been developed for satellite communication systems, and new satellites and
terminals have been built to implement the new systems.
The second edition of Satellite Communications makes no attempt to describe all
of the satellite systems now in operation. That would require an encyclopedia. The text
concentrates on the principles of satellite communication systems with the aim of pro-
viding the reader with a sound understanding of how a satellite communication system
successfully transfers information from one earth station to another. The first edition of
this text was written by Charles Bostian and Tim Pratt to support the courses we taught
on satellite communication. The book found wide popularity, both as a text for students
in senior year or beginning graduate courses at universities, and as a basic reference for
practicing engineers. In the second edition, we are honored to be joined by our friend
and colleague Jeremy Allnutt, with whom we have worked on satellite systems for over
25 years. He contributed the chapters on orbital mechanics, propagation, nongeostationary
satellite systems and VSAT networks.
Much material that was included in the first edition has been omitted in the second
to make way for chapters covering VSAT systems, LEO and NGSO systems, direct broad-
cast television, and satellite navigation. The advent of personal communications via low
earth orbit (LEO) satellites was not anticipated when the text was written in 1984, nor the
development of direct broadcasting from satellites using digital transmission. The growth
of very small aperture terminal (VSAT) systems has also occurred since 1986, and has
led to application of many of the techniques discussed in the first edition. The Global Po-
sitioning System (GPS) has become the dominant radio navigation aid, using a constel-
lation of 24 satellites to provide accurate position location everywhere on earth. Perhaps
the greatest change in technology over the past fifteen years has been the transition from
analog to digital transmission techniques. The transition is almost complete in the United
States, with only the distribution of video signals to cable TV head ends remaining as a
last bastion of analog transmission. The section in Chapter 5 of the first edition that cov-
ered FDM/FM/FDMA systems has been retained as an appendix because such systems
continue in operation in some parts of the world.
The emphasis throughout the text is on digital transmission techniques; Chapter 5
reviews the basic theory of digital radio transmission, which is fundamental to all digital
satellite systems. In parallel with the transition to digital satellite transmission, great
changes have occurred in terrestrial communication systems. Optical fibers were just start-
ing to come into use in 1986, and the Internet was still in its infancy. Cellular telephones
were barely in use. Many of the developments in terrestrial communication systems have
carried over to satellite systems, and much of the technology that was new in 1986 has
now matured and has been well described elsewhere.
ix
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page x
x PREFACE
Within the United States, satellites are not used for telephone (voice) links. The de-
velopment of terrestrial optical fiber links has made satellite transmission of telephone
traffic uneconomic, and the delay associated with GEO satellite link is a nuisance.
Domestic satellites serving the United States now carry video signals for distribution to
cable TV companies or direct to homes and serve networks of VSAT stations linked to
central hubs in major cities. The development of direct to home satellite broadcast tele-
vision (DBS-TV) has had a major impact on the marketplace. In the United States, digi-
tal DBS-TV transmissions are now received in 15 million homes (2001 figure), and in
Europe a similar number of homes receive satellite television programming. Video distri-
bution, to cable companies and direct to home, accounts for more than half of all the
worldwide earnings from satellite communication systems.
The authors would like to thank their colleagues and students who, over the years,
have made many valuable suggestions to improve this text. Their advice has been heeded,
and the second edition of Satellite Communication is the better for it. Many more worked
examples have been added to the second edition to illustrate how calculations are carried
out for each topic.
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page xi
CONTENTS
Preface ix
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 A Brief History of Satellite Communications 3
1.3 Satellite Communications in 2000 6
1.4 Overview of Satellite Communications 15
1.5 Summary 16
References 16
xi
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page xii
xii CONTENTS
2.7 Summary 54
References 54
Problems 55
3. Satellites 57
3.1 Satellite Subsystems 57
Attitude and Orbit Control System (AOCS) 57
Telemetry, Tracking, Command and Monitoring (TTC&M) 59
Power System 59
Communications Subsystems 59
Satellite Antennas 59
3.2 Attitude and Orbit Control System (AOCS) 60
Attitude Control System 60
Orbit Control System 66
3.3 Telemetry, Tracking, Command, and Monitoring 68
Telemetry and Monitoring System 68
Tracking 68
Command 70
3.4 Power Systems 71
3.5 Communications Subsystems 72
Description of the Communications System 72
Transponders 75
3.6 Satellite Antennas 80
Basic Antenna Types and Relationships 80
Example 3.6.1 Global Beam Antenna 82
Example 3.6.2 Regional Coverage Antenna 83
Satellite Antennas in Practice 83
3.7 Equipment Reliability and Space Qualification 87
Space Qualification 87
Reliability 88
Redundancy 90
3.8 Summary 92
References 93
Problems 93
CONTENTS xiii
xiv CONTENTS
FM Threshold 168
SCPC FM Links 169
Example 5.2.2 170
Data Transmission Using Analog FM Channels 170
Example 5.2.3 171
5.3 Digital Transmission 172
Baseband Digital Signals 172
Baseband Transmission of Digital Data 172
Band-pass Transmission of Digital Data 179
Example 5.3.1 181
Example 5.3.2 181
Transmission of QPSK Signals through a Bandlimited Channel 182
Example 5.3.3 185
Example 5.3.3 185
5.4 Digital Modulation and Demodulation 187
Terminology 187
Modulation and Coding 187
Bit and Symbol Error Rates 188
Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) 189
Probability of a Symbol Error 191
BPSK Bit Error Rate 194
QPSK Bit Error Rate 194
Example 5.4.1 195
Example 5.4.2 197
Generation of Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) Signals 198
QPSK Variants 199
5.5 Digital Transmission of Analog Signals 201
Sampling and Quantizing 201
Nonuniform Quantization: Compression and Expansion 204
Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Digital Voice Systems 206
Digital Television 208
5.6 Time Division Multiplexing 209
TDM Terminology: The U.S. T1 24-Channel System 209
Other TDM Systems 211
Channel Synchronization in TDM 212
5.7 Summary 212
References 213
Problems 214
6. Multiple Access 221
6.1 Introduction 221
6.2 Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) 223
Intermodulation 226
Intermodulation Example 228
Calculation of CN with Intermodulation 230
Example 6.2.1 Power Sharing in FDMA 231
Example 6.2.2 Channel Capacity with Demand Access FDMA 232
6.3 Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) 233
Bits, Symbols, and Channels 234
TDMA Frame Structure 235
fm.qxd 29/08/02 19:04 Page xv
CONTENTS xv
xvi CONTENTS
CONTENTS xvii
xviii CONTENTS
Teledesic 430
Example 10.6.1 System Design 432
10.7 Summary 434
References 434
Problems 435
CONTENTS xix
Glossary 513
Index 522
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Two developments in the twentieth century changed the way people lived: the automobile
and telecommunications. Prior to the widespread availability of personal automobiles, in-
dividuals had to travel on foot, by bicycle, or on horseback. Trains provided faster travel
between cities, but the lives of most people were centered on their hometowns and im-
mediate surroundings. A journey of 100 miles was a major expedition for most people,
and the easy mobility that we all take for granted in the twenty-first century was unknown.
Before the telegraph and telephone came into widespread use, all communication was
face-to-face, or in writing. If you wanted to talk to someone, you had to travel to meet
with that person, and travel was slow and arduous. If you wanted to send information, it
had to be written down and the papers hand carried to their destination.
Telecommunication systems have now made it possible to communicate with virtu-
ally anyone at any time. Early telegraph and telephone systems used copper wire to carry
signals over the earth’s surface and across oceans, and high frequency (HF) radio, also
commonly called short wave radio, made possible intercontinental telephone links. Arti-
ficial earth satellites have been used in communications systems for more than 35 years
and have become an essential part of the world’s telecommunications infrastructure. Satel-
lites allow people to talk by telephone and exchange electronic mail from anywhere in
the world and to receive hundreds of TV channels in their homes.
The origins of satellite communications can be traced to an article written by
Arthur C. Clarke in the British radio magazine Wireless World in 19451. At the time,
Clarke was serving in the British Royal Air Force, and was interested in long-distance
radio communication. He later became famous as the author of 2001: A Space Odyssey,
and other science fiction books2. In 1945, HF radio was the only available method for
radio communication over transcontinental distances, and it was not at all reliable.
Sunspots and ionospheric disturbances could disrupt HF radio links for days at a time.
Telegraph cables had been laid across the oceans as early as the mid-1800s, but cables
capable of carrying voice signals across the Atlantic did not begin service until 1953.
Clarke suggested that a radio relay satellite in an equatorial orbit with a period of 24 h
would remain stationary with respect to the earth’s surface and make possible long-
distance radio links. At the time Clarke wrote, there were no satellites in orbit nor rockets
powerful enough to launch them. But his ideas for what we now know as a geostationary
satellite system were not science fiction, as the launch of the Russian satellite Sputnik
in 1957 was to prove. In 1965 the first geostationary satellite, Early Bird, began
to provide telephone service across the Atlantic Ocean, fulfilling Clarke’s vision of
20 years earlier.
Satellite communication systems were originally developed to provide long-distance
telephone service. In the late 1960s, launch vehicles had been developed that could place
a 500 kg satellite in geostationary earth orbit (GEO), with a capacity of 5000 telephone
circuits, marking the start of an era of expansion for telecommunication satellites.
Geostationary satellites were soon carrying transoceanic and transcontinental telephone calls.
1
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 2
2 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
For the first time, live television links could be established across the Atlantic and Pacific
oceans to carry news and sporting events.
The geostationary orbit is preferred for all high capacity communication satellite
systems because a satellite in GEO appears to be stationary over a fixed point on the
ground. It can establish links to one-third of the earth’s surface using fixed antennas at
the earth stations. This is particularly valuable for broadcasting, as a single satellite can
serve an entire continent. Direct broadcast satellite television (DBS-TV) and the distri-
bution of video signals for cable television networks are the largest single revenue source
for geostationary satellites, accounting for $17 B in revenues in 1998. By year 2001, nearly
200 GEO communication satellites were in orbit, serving every part of the globe. Although
television accounts for much of the traffic carried by these satellites, international and
regional telephony, data transmission, and Internet access are also important. In the pop-
ulated parts of the world, the geostationary orbit is filled with satellites every 2° or 3°
operating in almost every available frequency band.
GEO satellites have grown steadily in weight, size, lifetime, and cost over the years.
Some of the largest satellites launched to date are the KH and Lacrosse surveillance satel-
lites of the U.S. National Reconnaissance Office weighing an estimated 13,600 kg (30,000
lb)3. By 2000, commercial telecommunications satellites weighing 6000 kg with lifetimes
of 15 years were being launched into geostationary orbit at a typical cost around $125 M
for the satellite and launch. The revenue earning capacity of these satellites must exceed
$20 M per year for the venture to be profitable, and they must compete with optical fibers
in carrying voice, data, and video signals. A single optical fiber can carry 4.5 Gbps, a ca-
pacity similar to that of the largest GEO satellites, and optical fibers are never laid singly
but always in bundles. But GEO satellites can compete effectively on flexibility of delivery
point. Any place within the satellite coverage can be served by simply installing an earth
terminal. To do the same with a fiber-optic link requires fiber to be laid. Fiber-optic trans-
mission systems compete effectively with satellites where there is a requirement for high
capacity or, equivalently, when the user density exceeds the required economic threshold.
GEO satellites have been supplemented by low and medium earth orbit satellites for
special applications. Low earth orbit (LEO) satellites can provide satellite telephone and
data services over continents or over the entire world, and by 2000 three systems were in
orbit or nearing completion, with a total of 138 LEO satellites. LEO satellites are also
used for earth imaging and surveillance. Although not strictly a satellite communications
system, the Global Positioning System (GPS), which uses 24 medium earth orbit (MEO)
SIDEBAR
The high capacity of both optical fibers and satellites, To put the reduction in the cost of an international tele-
and the steady move of telecommunications traffic phone call in perspective, we must remember that in-
from analog signals to digital has lowered the cost of comes have risen significantly over this time period.
long-distance telephone calls and increased enor- In the 1950s, a typical blue-collar wage was $1.50 per
mously the number of circuits available. In 1960, prior hour, so a blue-collar worker had to work for 40 min
to the advent of satellite communications, the United to pay for a call to Europe, ignoring any tax deduc-
States had 550 overseas telephone circuits. Calls to tions. In 2000, the average worker in the United States
Europe cost more than $1 per minute at 1960 prices, earned $11.00 per hour, and had to work less than 1
and had to be placed through an operator, with delays min to pay for the international call. The United States
of many hours being common. In 2000, virtually all now has hundreds of thousands of overseas telephone
international calls could be dialed by the end user, and circuits, and video links daily carry live news reports
rates to Europe had dropped to below $0.10 per minute. from all over the globe.
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 3
satellites, has revolutionized navigation. GPS receivers have become a consumer product.
Eventually every car and cellular telephone will have a GPS receiver built into it so that
drivers will not get lost and emergency calls from cellular phones will automatically carry
information about the phone’s location.
Satellite communications began in October 1957 with the launch by the USSR of a small
satellite called Sputnik I. This was the first artificial earth satellite, and it sparked the space
race between the United States and the USSR. Sputnik I carried only a beacon transmit-
ter and did not have communications capability, but demonstrated that satellites could be
placed in orbit by powerful rockets. The first satellite successfully launched by the United
States was Explorer I, lofted from Cape Canaveral on January 31, 1958 on a Juno I rocket.
The first voice heard from space was that of President Eisenhower, who recorded a brief
Christmas message that was transmitted back to earth from the Project Score satellite in
December 1958. The Score satellite was essentially the core of the Atlas ICBM (inter-
continental ballistic missile) booster with a small payload in the nose. A tape recorder on
Score had a storage capacity that allowed a 4 min message received from an earth station
to be retransmitted. The batteries on Score failed after 35 days in orbit.
After some early attempts to use large balloons (Echo I and II) as passive reflec-
tors for communication signals, and some small experimental satellite launches, the first
true communications satellites, Telstar I and II, were launched in July 1962 and May 1963.
The Telstar satellites were built by Bell Telephone Laboratories and used C-band transpon-
ders adapted from terrestrial microwave link equipment. The uplink was at 6389 MHz and
the downlink was at 4169 MHz, with 50-MHz bandwidth. The satellites carried solar cells
and batteries that allowed continuous use of the single transponder, and demonstrations
of live television links and multiplexed telephone circuits were made across the Atlantic
Ocean, emphatically demonstrating the feasibility of satellite communications.
The Telstar satellites were launched into what is now called a medium earth orbit,
with periods of 158 and 225 min. This allowed transatlantic links to operate for about 20 min
while the satellite was mutually visible. The orbits chosen for the Telstar satellites took
them through several bands of high energy radiation which caused early failure of the elec-
tronics on board. However, the value of communication satellites had been demonstrated
and work was begun to develop launch vehicles that could deliver a payload to geosta-
tionary orbit, and to develop satellites that could provide useful communication capacity.
On July 24, 1961, U.S. President John F. Kennedy defined the general guidelines
of U.S. policy in regard to satellite communications and made the first unambiguous ref-
erences to a single worldwide system. On December 20, 1961, the U.S. Congress rec-
ommended that the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) should examine the
aspects of space communications for which international cooperation would be necessary.
The most critical step was in August 1962, when the U.S. Congress passed the Commun-
ications Satellite Act. This set the stage for commercial investment in an international
satellite organization and, on July 19, 1964, representatives of the first 12 countries to in-
vest in what became Intelsat (the International Telecommunications Satellite Organiza-
tion) signed an initial agreement. The company that represented the United States at this
initial signing ceremony was Comsat, an entity specifically created to act for the United
States within Intelsat. It should be remembered that, at this point, the Bell System had a
complete monopoly of all long-distance telephone communications within the United
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 4
4 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
States. When Congress passed the Communications Satellite Act, the Bell System was
specifically barred from directly participating in satellite communications, although it was
permitted to invest in Comsat.
Comsat essentially managed Intelsat in the formative years and should be credited
with the remarkable success of the international venture. The first five Intelsat series of
satellites (INTELSAT I through V) were selected, and their procurement managed, by
teams put in place under Comsat leadership. Over this same phase, though, large portions
of the Comsat engineering and operations groups transferred over to Intelsat so that, when
the Permanent Management Arrangements came into force in 1979, many former Comsat
groups were now part of Intelsat.
In mid-1963, 99% of all satellites had been launched into LEO. LEO, and the slightly
higher medium earth orbit (MEO), were much easier to reach than GEO with the small
launchers available at that time. The intense debate was eventually settled on launcher re-
liability issues rather than on payload capabilities. The first 6 years of the so-called space
age was a period of both payload and launcher development. The new frontier was very
risky, with about one launch in four being fully successful. The system architecture of the
first proposed commercial communications satellite system employed 12 satellites in an
equatorial MEO constellation. Thus, with the launch failure rate at the time, 48 launches
were envisioned to guarantee 12 operational satellites in orbit. Without 12 satellites in or-
bit, continuous 24-h coverage could not be offered. Twenty-four hours a day, seven days
a week—referred to as 247 operation—is a requirement for any successful communica-
tions service. A GEO systems architecture requires only one satellite to provide 247 op-
eration over essentially one-third of the inhabited world. On this basis, four launches would
be required to achieve coverage of one third of the earth; 12 for the entire inhabited world.
Despite its unproven technological approach, the geostationary orbit was selected by the
entities that became Intelsat.
The first Intelsat satellite, INTELSAT I (formerly Early Bird) was launched on April
16, 1965. The satellite weighed a mere 36 kg (80 lb) and incorporated two 64 GHz
transponders, each with 25-MHz bandwidth. Commercial operations commenced between
Europe and the United States on June 28, 1965. Thus, about 2 decades after Clarke’s land-
mark article in Wireless World, GEO satellite communications began. Intelsat was highly
successful and grew rapidly as many countries saw the value of improved telecommuni-
cations, not just internationally but for national systems that provided high quality satellite
communications within the borders of large countries.
Canada was the first country to build a national telecommunication system using
GEO satellites. Anik 1A was launched in May 1974, just 2 months before the first U.S.
domestic satellite, WESTAR 1. The honor of the first regional satellite system, however,
goes to the USSR Molniya system of highly elliptic orbit (HEO) satellites, the first of
which was launched in April 1965 (the same month as INTELSAT I). Countries that are
geographically spread like the USSR, which covers 11 time zones, have used regional
satellite systems very effectively. Another country that benefited greatly from a GEO re-
gional system was Indonesia, which consists of more than 3000 islands spread out over
more than a thousand miles. A terrestrially based telecommunication system was not eco-
nomically feasible for these countries, while a single GEO satellite allowed instant com-
munications region wide. Such ease of communications via GEO satellites proved to be
very profitable. Within less than 10 years, Intelsat was self-supporting and, since it was
not allowed to make a profit, it began returning substantial revenues to what were known
as its Signatories. Within 25 years, Intelsat had more than 100 Signatories4 and, in early
2000, there were 143 member countries and Signatories that formed part of the interna-
tional Intelsat community.
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 5
The astonishing commercial success of Intelsat led many nations to invest in their
satellite systems. This was particularly true in the United States. By the end of 1983, tele-
phone traffic carried by the U.S. domestic satellite systems earned more revenue than the
Intelsat system. Many of the original Intelsat Signatories had been privatized by the early
1990s and were, in effect, competing not only with each other in space communications,
but with Intelsat. It was clear that some mechanism had to be found whereby Intelsat could
be turned into a for-profit, private entity, which could then compete with other commer-
cial organizations while still safeguarding the interests of the smaller nations that had come
to depend on the remarkably low communications cost that Intelsat offered. The first step
in the move to privatizing Intelsat was the establishment of a commercial company called
New Skies and the transfer of a number of Intelsat satellites to New Skies.
In the 1970s and 1980s there was rapid development of GEO satellite systems for
international, regional, and domestic telephone traffic and video distribution. In the United
States, the expansion of fiber-optic links with very high capacity and low delay caused vir-
tually all telephone traffic to move to terrestrial circuits by 1985. However, the demand
for satellite systems grew steadily through this period, and the available spectrum in
C band was quickly occupied, leading to expansion into Ku band. In the United States,
most of the expansion after 1985 was in the areas of video distribution and VSAT (very
small aperture terminal) networks. By 1995 it was clear that the GEO orbit capacity at
Ku band would soon be filled, and Ka-band satellite systems would be needed to handle
the expansion of digital traffic, especially wide band delivery of high-speed Internet data.
SES, based in Luxemburg, began two-way multimedia and Internet access service in west-
ern and central Europe at Ka band using the Astra 1H satellite in 20016. Several Ka-band
satellite systems are expected to be operational in the United States by 20037,8.
The ability of satellite systems to provide communication with mobile users had
long been recognized, and the International Maritime Satellite Organization (Inmarsat)
has provided service to ships and aircraft for several decades, although at a high price.
LEO satellites were seen as one way to create a satellite telephone system with worldwide
coverage; numerous proposals were floated in the 1990s, with three LEO systems eventu-
ally reaching completion by 2000 (Iridium, Globalstar, and Orbcomm). The implementation
of a LEO and MEO satellite system for mobile communication has proved much more
costly than anticipated, and the capacity of the systems is relatively small compared to
SIDEBAR
The first step in the move to privatizing Intelsat was Intelsat is currently (2000) in the process of re-
the establishment of a commercial company called newing its major assets through the purchase of up to
New Skies. New Skies is based in the Netherlands seven INTELSAT IX satellites from SS-Loral to re-
and, on 30 November 1998, six satellites were trans- place the current fleet of INTELSAT VI, and some of
ferred from Intelsat ownership to New Skies. There the INTELSAT VII, satellites. Each of these satellites
was one INTELSAT V series satellite (IS-513 at carries the equivalent of 96 units of 36 MHz band-
183° E), one INTELSAT VII series satellite (IS-703 width. The satellites will be located at 62° E, 60° E,
at 57° E), two INTELSAT VIII series satellites 335.5° E, 325.5° E, 332.5° E, 342° E, and 328.5° E.
(IS-803 at 338.5° E and IS-806 at 319.5° E), the More details on the Intelsat fleet of satellites can be
INTELSAT-K satellite (in inclined orbit at 338.5° E), found at http://www.intelsat.int. Intelsat is moving
and a new satellite designed for direct broadcast serv- forward with plans to privatize the remainder of the
ices (K-TV at 95° E). New Skies has as their prime organization in the 2002/2003 time frame. Any reor-
businesses plan the provisioning of TV services, both ganization will contain strong safeguards for smaller
distribution and direct to home. users to the system.
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 6
6 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
GEO satellite systems, leading to a higher cost per transmitted bit. Satellite telephone sys-
tems were unable to compete with cellular telephone systems because of the high cost
and relatively low capacity of the space segment. The Iridium system, for example, cost
over $5 B to implement, but provided a total capacity for the United States of less than
10,000 telephone circuits. Iridium Inc. declared bankruptcy in early 2000, having failed
to establish a sufficiently large customer base to make the venture viable. The entire Irid-
ium system was sold to Iridium Satellite LLC for a reported $25 M, approximately 0.5%
of the system’s construction cost. The future of the other LEO and MEO satellite telephone
systems also seemed uncertain at the time this book was written.
Satellite navigation systems, notably the Global Positioning System, have revolu-
tionized navigation and surveying. The Global Positioning System took almost 20 years
to design and fully implement, at a cost of $12 B. By 2000, GPS receivers could be built
in Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) form for less than $25, and the worldwide
GPS industry was earning billions of dollars from equipment sales and services. In the
United States, aircraft navigation will depend almost entirely on GPS by 2010, and blind
landing systems using GPS will also be available. Accurate navigation of ships, especially
in coastal waters and bad weather, is also heavily reliant on GPS. Europe is building a
comparable satellite navigation system called Gallileo.
Tables 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 list the majority of the GEO, MEO, and LEO communication
satellites in orbit in 2000. The list is not exhaustive, and excludes satellites used solely
for military communications and surveillance, and those used primarily for weather fore-
casting and earth imaging. Not all the communications satellites are included, and exper-
imental and scientific satellites are omitted. In all, Tables 1.1 and 1.2 list a total of 172
geostationary communication satellites. When other satellites in geostationary orbit are
considered, there were close to 200 GEO satellites in operation in 2000 (Table 1.4).
GEO satellites have always been the backbone of the commercial satellite commu-
nications industry. Large GEO satellites can serve one-third of the earth’s surface, and can
carry up to 4 Gbps of data, or transmit up to 16 high power direct broadcast satellite tele-
vision (DBS-TV) signals, each of which can deliver several video channels. The weight
and power of GEO satellites have also increased. In 2000 a large GEO satellite could
weigh 10,000 kg (10 tons), might generate 12 kW of power, and carry 60 transponders,
with a trend toward even higher powers but lower weight. For example, in 2001 Space
System/Loral contracted with APT Satellite Company Ltd. in Hong Kong to build the
Apstar-V satellite, a GEO satellite serving Asia with a mass of 4845 kg when injected
into geostationary orbit and an expected lifetime of 13 years. Apstar-V will generate an
initial power of 10.6 kW, and carry 38 C-band transponders with 60-W output power and
16 Ku-band transponders at 141 W each5. Satellites generating 25 kW and carrying
antennas with hundreds of beams are planned for the time frame 2005–2010.
Television program distribution and DBS-TV have become the major source of rev-
enue for commercial satellite system operators, earning more than half of the industry’s
$30 B revenues for 1998. By the end of 2000 there were over 14 million DBS-TV cus-
tomers in the United States. The high capacity of GEO satellites results from the use of
high-power terrestrial transmitters and relatively high gain earth station antennas. Earth
station antenna gain translates directly into communication capacity, and therefore into
revenue. Increased capacity lowers the delivery cost per bit for a customer. Systems with
fixed directional antennas can deliver bits at a significantly lower cost than systems using
TABLE 1.1 GEO Satellite Systems: U.S. Operators (after 3, 5)
http://www.AmMobile.com
Columbia Columbia 515 Telecommunications 12 C band 37.7° W
Communications Corp., (formerly Intelsat 515) 12 Ka band
Bethesda, MD
http://www.tdrss.com TDRSS-5, 6 Data relay 4, 12 C band 174.3° E, 47° W
Comsat Corp., Inmarsat 2F, 1–4 Mobile 9 GEO satellites Many locations
Bethesda, MD ship and aircraft L band
http://www.comsat.com Inmarsat 3F, 1–5 communications See Inmarsat entry
Comsat is the U.S.
provider of Inmarsat
and Intelsat Telecommunications 19 GEO satellites Many locations
Intelsat services C band and Ku band
See Intelsat entry
Directv Inc., DBS-1, 2, 3, Direct to home Ku band BSS band 110° W
El Segundo, CA Directv-3R digital television DBS-1, 2, 3, 3R:
http://www.directv.com broadcasting 16 HP transponders 101° W
Tempo 2 Tempo 2: 11
transponders 119° W
Echostar Echostar 1–5 Direct to home Ku band BSS band Echostar 1, 2: 119° W
Communications Corp., digital television 16 transponders per Echostar 3: 61.5° W
Littleton, CO broadcasting satellite Echostar 4: 148° W
http://www.dishnetwork.com Echostar 5: 110° W
GE Americom, GE-1, 1A, 2–8 Telecommunications, 24 C band 79° W through 139° W
Princeton, NJ video distribution, Up to 28 Ku band
http://www.geamericom.com GE-1E broadcasting, 16 Ku band 5° E
VSAT networks
GE Gstar 4 16 Ku band 105° W
(continued )
7
8
TABLE 1.1 (continued )
broadcasting only
Satcom K-2 16 Ku band 85° W
Spacenet 3, 4 18 C band 85° W, 83° W
6 Ku band
Loral Skynet, Telstar 4, 5, 6, 7 Broadcasting, 24 C band 89° W, 97° W, 93° W,
Bedminster, NJ video distribution, 16 to 28 Ku band 129° W
http://www.loralskynet.com Telstar 11, 12 telecommunications 34, 38 Ku band 37.5° W, 34° W
PanAmSat Corp., Galaxy 1RR, 5, 6, 9 Telecommunications 24 C band 133° W, 125° W,
Greenwich, CT 74° W, 123° W
http://www.panamsat.com Galaxy 3R Telecommunications 24 C band, 8 Ku band 95° W
Galaxy 7 Telecommunications 8 C band, 32 Ku band 91° W
Galaxy 8L DBS-TV broadcasting 91° W
to Latin America Up to 24 C band
Up to 36 Ku band
PAS 1, 3R, 4, 5, 6B, 7 Telecommunications 16 C band, 16 Ku band 43° W through 68.5° W
24 C band, 24 Ku band
PAS 2, 8 Telecommunications 36 Ku band 169° W, 166° W
PAS 6 DBS-TV broadcasting 43° W
to South America 14, 14, 19 Ku band
SBS-4, 5, 6 Telecommunications 77° W, 123° W,
74° W
WorldSpace Corp., AfriStar Audio broadcasting 6 HP Ku band 21° E
Washington, DC
http://www.worldspace.com AmeriStar Broadcasting 95° W
AsiaStar Broadcasting 105° E
a
Telecommunications means any form of signal that can be sent through a satellite transponder, including analog and digital voice, data, and video.
For more complete information about these satellite systems consult reference 6.
There are 71 GEO satellites listed in the above table.
TABLE 1.2 GEO Satellite Systems: Non-U.S. and International Operators (after 3, 5)
ACeS Asia Cellular Garuda 1 Mobile communications 140 with spot beams 123° E
Satellite, Indonesia
www.acesinternational.com
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 9
(continued )
9
10
TABLE 1.2 (continued )
Eutelsat, Eutelsat 1 F-4, F-5 Broadcasting, 10 Ku band (2 spare) 25.5° E, 21.5° E
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 10
(continued )
11
12
TABLE 1.2 (continued )
www.superbird.co.jp
Superbird C 23 Ku band, 2 Ka band 144° E
Spacecom Satellite Amos 1 DBS-TV, 7 Ku band 4° W
Communication telecommunications
Services,
Ramat-Gan, Israel
www.spacecom.co.il
Swedish Space Corp., Sirius 1 DBS-TV 5 Ku band 5° E
Solna, Sweden
www.ssc.se Sirius 2 DBS-TV, VSAT 32 Ku band 5° E
networks
Sirius 3 DBS-TV 15 Ku band
Telenor Satellite Thor 1 Broadcasting, 5 Ku band 1° E
Services AS, telecommunications
Oslo, Norway Thor 2 15 Ku band 1° E
www.telenor.com
Thor 3 14 Ku band 1° E
Telesat Canada, Anik E1 Broadcasting, 14 C band, 12 Ku band 111.1° W
Gloucester, ON, Canada telecommunications
www.telesat.ca Anik E2 14 C band, 12 Ku band 107.3° W
TMI Communications, MSat 1 Mobile communications 16 L band, 1 Ku band 106.5° W
Ottawa, Canada
www.tmisolutions.com
Turk Telekom, Turksat 1B, 1C Broadcasting, 31.3° E, 42° E
Ankara, Turkey telecommunications
Globalstar, 48 LEO satellites with Mobile communications, 16 spot beams within Six orbital planes
San Jose, CA, USA four spares in orbit satellite telephones, footprint. Each beam inclined at 52°, eight
www.globalstar.com all digital has multiple 1.25-MHz satellites per plane
channels with 1 to 13 1413 km altitude
channels per beam. (763 nm)
Multiple access through
CDMA. L- and S-band
links to mobiles
Iridium LLC, 66 LEO satellites with Mobile communications, 48 spot beams with Six orbital planes
Washington, DC, USA seven spares in orbit satellite telephones, seven RF channels in inclined at 84.6°, eleven
www.iridium.com all digital 8 MHz. L-band links satellites per plane
to mobiles. Ka-band 898 km altitude
links to Gateways. (485 nm)
22 GHz satellite cross
links. Multiple access
through FDMA/TDMA
Orbcomm Global L.P., 28 LEO satellites Data transmission to Bent pipe transponder 24 satellites in 45°
Dulles, VA, USA handheld and mobile with earth coverage inclined orbits.
www.orbcomm.com terminals beams. Data rate up to Two in 70° inclined
2400 bps in 0.1-s bursts orbits, two inclined 108°
vhf links to mobiles
(uplink 148 MHz,
downlink 137 MHz)
13
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 14
14 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Global positioning Navstar GPS Design lifetime 7.5 years Navigation, Six orbital
System (GPS), 13 through 21 early warning planes with
operated by U.S. 22 through 40 Design lifetime 10 years four satellites
Air Force per plane at
Useful web sites: 43, 44, 45 Design lifetime 10 years 20,200 km
www.navcen.uscg.mil altitude.
www.laafb.af.mil/SMC/ All satellites broadcast Inclination
CZ/homepage/ CDMA signals on two of orbital
http://gps.faa.gov/ L-band frequencies plane is 55°
http://www.spacecom.
af.mil
low gain antennas, such as those designed for use by mobile users. Consequently, GEO
satellites look set to be the largest revenue earners in space for the foreseeable future.
Figure 1.1 shows the estimated growth in revenue from all satellite communication
services, projected to 2010.
All radio systems require frequency spectrum, and the delivery of high-speed data
requires a wide bandwidth. Satellite communication systems started in C band, with an
allocation of 500 MHz, shared with terrestrial microwave links. As the GEO orbit filled
up with satellites operating at C band, satellites were built for the next available frequency
band, Ku band. There is a continuing demand for ever more spectrum to allow satellites
to provide new services, with high speed access to the Internet forcing a move to Ka-band
and even higher frequencies. Access to the Internet from small transmitting Ka-band earth
stations located at the home offers a way to bypass the terrestrial telephone network and
achieve much higher bit rates. SES began two-way Ka-band Internet access in Europe in
1998 with the Astra-K satellite, and the next generation of Ka-band satellites in the United
States will offer similar services.
200
Worldwide revenue in billions of $U.S.
100
0
19802000 2010
1990
Year
FIGURE 1.1 Growth of worldwide revenues from satellite communications
1980 through 2010. Beyond 2000, the curve is a projection.
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 15
Successive World Radio Conferences have allocated new frequency bands for com-
mercial satellite services that now include L, S, C, Ku, K, Ka, V, and Q bands. Mobile satel-
lite systems use vhf, uhf, L, and S bands with carrier frequencies from 137 to 2500 MHz,
and GEO satellites use frequency bands extending from 3.2 to 50 GHz. Despite the growth
of fiber-optic links with very high capacity, the demand for satellite systems continues to in-
crease. Satellites have also become integrated into complex communications architectures that
use each element of the network to its best advantage. Examples are VSAT/WLL (very small
aperture terminals/wireless local loop) in countries where the communications infrastructure
is not yet mature and GEO/LMDS (local multipoint distribution systems) for the urban fringes
of developed nations where the build-out of fiber has yet to be an economic proposition.
Satellite communication systems exist because the earth is a sphere. Radio waves travel
in straight lines at the microwave frequencies used for wideband communications, so a
repeater is needed to convey signals over long distances. Satellites, because they can link
places on the earth that are thousands of miles apart, are a good place to locate a repeater,
and a GEO satellite is the best place of all. A repeater is simply a receiver linked to a
transmitter, always using different radio frequencies, that can receive a signal from one
earth station, amplify it, and retransmit it to another earth station. The repeater derives
its name from nineteenth century telegraph links, which had a maximum length of about
50 miles. Telegraph repeater stations were required every 50 miles in a long-distance link
so that the Morse code signals could be re-sent before they became too weak to read.
The majority of communication satellites are in geostationary earth orbit, at an
altitude of 35,786 km. Typical path length from an earth station to a GEO satellite is
38,500 km. Radio signals get weaker in proportion to the square of the distance trav-
eled, so signals reaching a satellite are always very weak. Similarly, signals received on
earth from a satellite 38,500 km away are also very weak, because of limits on the
weight of GEO satellites and the electrical power they can generate using solar cells. It
costs roughly $25,000 per kilogram to get a geostationary satellite in orbit. This obvi-
ously places severe restrictions on the size and weight of GEO satellites, since the high
cost of building and launching a satellite must be recovered over a 10 to 15 year lifetime
by selling communications capacity.
Satellite communication systems are dominated by the need to receive very weak
signals. In the early days, very large receiving antennas, with diameters up to 30 m, were
needed to collect sufficient signal power to drive video signals or multiplexed telephone
channels. As satellites have become larger, heavier, and more powerful, smaller earth
station antennas have become feasible, and Direct Broadcast Satellite TV (DBS-TV) re-
ceiving systems can use dish antennas as small as 0.5 m in diameter.
Satellite systems operate in the microwave and millimeter wave frequency bands,
using frequencies between 1 and 50 GHz. Above 10 GHz, rain causes significant attenu-
ation of the signal and the probability that rain will occur in the path between the satellite
and an earth station must be factored into the system design. Above 20 GHz, attenuation
in heavy rain (usually associated with thunderstorms) can cause sufficient attenuation that
the link will fail.
For the first 20 years of satellite communications, analog signals were widely used,
with most links employing frequency modulation (FM). Wideband FM can operate at
low carrier-to-noise ratios (C/N), in the 5 to 15 dB range, but adds a signal-to-noise
c01.qxd 13/07/02 14:02 Page 16
16 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
improvement so that video and telephone signals can be delivered with signal-to-noise
ratios (S/N) of 50 dB. The penalty for the improvement is that the radio frequency (RF)
signal occupies a much larger bandwidth than the baseband signal. In satellite links, that
penalty results because signals are always weak and the improvement in signal-to-noise
ratio is essential.
The move toward digital communications in terrestrial telephone and data trans-
mission has been mirrored by a similar move toward digital transmission over satellite
links. In the United States, only TV distribution at C band remains as the major analog
satellite transmission system. Even this last bastion of analog signaling seems destined to
disappear as cable TV stations switch over to digital receivers that allow six TV signals
to be sent though a single Ku-band transponder. More importantly, dual standards per-
mitting the transmission of not only digital TV but also high definition TV (HDTV), will
eventually remove analog TV from consideration.
Almost all other signals are digital—telephony, data, DBS-TV, radio broadcasting,
and navigation with GPS all use digital signaling techniques. All of the LEO and MEO
mobile communication systems are digital, taking advantage of voice compression tech-
niques that allow a digital voice signal to be compressed into a bit stream at 4.8 kbps.
Similarly, MPEG 2 (Moving Picture Coding Expert Group) and other video compression
techniques allow video signals to be transmitted in full fidelity at rates less then 6.2 Mbps.
1.5 SUMMARY
Satellite communication systems have become an services, because the use of high gain fixed anten-
essential part of the world’s telecommunications in- nas at earth stations maximizes the capacity of the
frastructure, serving billions of people with tele- satellite. Over the years, there has been a trend away
phone, data, and video services. Despite the growth from trunk communications using very large earth
of fiber-optic links, which have much greater ca- station antennas toward delivery from more power-
pacity than satellite systems and a lower cost per ful satellites to individual users using much smaller
bit, satellite systems continue to thrive and invest- antennas. LEO and MEO satellites are used for mo-
ment in new systems continues. Satellite services bile communications and navigation systems and,
have shifted away from telephony toward video and as the need for Geographic Information Systems
data delivery, with television broadcasting directly grows with a variety of applications, LEO earth im-
to the home emerging as one of the most powerful aging satellites have the potential to provide strong
applications. GEO satellites carry the majority of revenue streams.
REFERENCES
1. A. C. CLARKE, “Extra-terrestrial Relays,” Wireless World, 5. Aviation Week and Space Technology, Aerospace Source
pp. 305–308, 1945. Book, McGraw-Hill, New York, Vol. 154, No. 3,
2. A. C. CLARKE, 2001: A Space Odyssey, New American pp. 161–179 and pp. 249–266, Jan. 15, 2001.
Library, New York. 6. http://www.astra.lu
3. Aviation Week and Space Technology, Aerospace Source 7. www.astrolink.com
Book, McGraw-Hill, New York, Vol. 153, No. 3, January 8. www.hns.com.spaceway
17, 2000.
4. D. W. E. REES, “Satellite Communications: The First
Quarter Century of Service,” John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1989.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 17
CHAPTER 2
ORBITAL MECHANICS
AND LAUNCHERS
17
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 18
the body multiplied by the resulting acceleration of the body. Alternatively, the resulting
acceleration is the ratio of the force acting on the body to the mass of the body. Thus, for
a given force, the lighter the mass of the body, the higher the acceleration will be. When
in a stable orbit, there are two main forces acting on a satellite: a centrifugal force due to
the kinetic energy of the satellite, which attempts to fling the satellite into a higher orbit,
and a centripetal force due to the gravitational attraction of the planet about which the
satellite is orbiting, which attempts to pull the satellite down toward the planet. If these
two forces are equal, the satellite will remain in a stable orbit. It will continually fall to-
ward the planet’s surface as it moves forward in its orbit but, by virtue of its orbital ve-
locity, it will have moved forward just far enough to compensate for the “fall” toward the
planet and so it will remain at the same orbital height. This is why an object in a stable
orbit is sometimes described as being in “free fall.” Figure 2.1 shows the two opposing
forces on a satellite in a stable orbit1.
Force mass acceleration and the unit of force is a Newton, with the notation
N. A Newton is the force required to accelerate a mass of 1 kg with an acceleration of
1 m/s2. The underlying units of a Newton are therefore (kg) m/s2. In Imperial Units,
one Newton 0.2248 ft lb. The standard acceleration due to gravity at the earth’s sur-
face is 9.80665 103 km/s2, which is often quoted as 981 cm/s2. This value decreases
2
FOUT = mv
r
FIN = GM2Em
r
ME
FIGURE 2.1 Forces acting on a satellite in a stable orbit around the earth (from Fig. 3.4 of
reference 1). Gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between
the centers of gravity of the satellite and the planet the satellite is orbiting, in this case the
earth. The gravitational force inward (FIN, the centripetal force) is directed toward the center of
gravity of the earth. The kinetic energy of the satellite (FOUT, the centrifugal force) is directed
diametrically opposite to the gravitational force. Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of
the velocity of the satellite. When these inward and outward forces are balanced, the satellite
moves around the earth in a “free fall” trajectory: the satellite’s orbit. For a description of the
units, please see the text.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 19
with height above the earth’s surface. The acceleration, a, due to gravity at a distance r
from the center of the earth is1
a mr 2 km/s2 (2.1)
where the constant is the product of the universal gravitational constant G and the mass
of the earth ME.
The product GME is called Kepler’s constant and has the value 3.986004418
105 km3/s2. The universal gravitational constant is G 6.672 1011 Nm2/kg2 or 6.672
1020 km3/kg s2 in the older units. Since force mass acceleration, the centripetal
force acting on the satellite, FIN, is given by
FIN m 1mr 2 2 (2.2a)
m 1GME r 2 2 (2.2b)
In a similar fashion, the centrifugal acceleration is given by1
a v2 r (2.3)
which will give the centrifugal force, FOUT, as
FOUT m 1v2r2 (2.4)
If the forces on the satellite are balanced, FIN FOUT and, using Eqs. (2.2a) and (2.4),
m mr 2 m v2 r
hence the velocity v of a satellite in a circular orbit is given by
v 1mr2 12 (2.5)
If the orbit is circular, the distance traveled by a satellite in one orbit around a planet is
2r, where r is the radius of the orbit from the satellite to the center of the planet. Since
distance divided by velocity equals time to travel that distance, the period of the satellite’s
orbit, T, will be
T 12pr2 v 12pr2 3 1mr2 12 4
Giving
T 12pr 32 2 1m12 2 (2.6)
Table 2.1 gives the velocity, v, and orbital period, T, for four satellite systems that
occupy typical LEO, MEO, and GEO orbits around the earth. In each case, the orbits are
Mean earth radius is 6378.137 km and GEO radius from the center of the
earth is 42,164.17 km.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 20
z
FIGURE 2.2 The initial coordinate
system that could be used to de-
scribe the relationship between the
Earth rotation earth and a satellite. A Cartesian
Satellite coordinate system with the geo-
graphical axes of the earth as the
r principal axes is the simplest coor-
dinate system to set up. The rota-
tional axis of the earth is about the
c Equatorial plane
axis cz, where c is the center of the
earth and cz passes through the
geographic north pole. Axes cx, cy,
and cz are mutually orthogonal
axes, with cx and cy passing
y
through the earth’s geographic
equator. The vector r locates the
moving satellite with respect to the
x center of the earth.
circular and the average radius of the earth is taken as 6378.137 km1. A number of coor-
dinate systems and reference planes can be used to describe the orbit of a satellite around
a planet. Figure 2.2 illustrates one of these using a Cartesian coordinate system with the
earth at the center and the reference planes coinciding with the equator and the polar axis.
This is referred to as a geocentric coordinate system.
With the coordinate system set up as in Figure 2.2, and with the satellite mass m
located at a vector distance r from the center of the earth, the gravitational force F on the
satellite is given by
GME m r
F (2.7)
r3
Where ME is the mass of the earth and G 6.672 1011 Nm2/kg2. But force mass
acceleration and Eq. (2.7) can be written as
d2r
Fm (2.8)
dt 2
From Eqs. (2.7) and (2.8) we have
r d2r
3m (2.9)
r dt 2
Which yields
d2r r
2 m0 (2.10)
dt r3
This is a second-order linear differential equation and its solution will involve six
undetermined constants called the orbital elements. The orbit described by these orbital
elements can be shown to lie in a plane and to have a constant angular momentum. The
solution to Eq. (2.10) is difficult since the second derivative of r involves the second de-
rivative of the unit vector r. To remove this dependence, a different set of coordinates can
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 21
z
z0
be chosen to describe the location of the satellite such that the unit vectors in the three
axes are constant. This coordinate system uses the plane of the satellite’s orbit as the ref-
erence plane. This is shown in Figure 2.3.
Expressing Eq. (2.10) in terms of the new coordinate axes x0, y0, and z0 gives
d 2x0 d 2y0 m1x0 x̂0 y0 ŷ0 2
x̂0 a b a 2 b 0
1x20 y20 2 32
2 ŷ0 (2.11)
dt dt
Equation (2.11) is easier to solve if it is expressed in a polar coordinate system rather than
a Cartesian coordinate system. The polar coordinate system is shown in Figure 2.4.
With the polar coordinate system shown in Figure 2.4 and using the transformations
x0 r0 cos f0 (2.12a)
y0 r0 sin f0 (2.12b)
x̂0 r̂0 cos f0 f̂0 sin f0 (2.12c)
ŷ0 f̂0 cos f0 r̂0 sin f0 (2.12d)
and equating the vector components of r0 and 0 in turn in Eq. (2.11) yields
d 2r0
2 r0 a b 2
df0 m
(2.13)
dt dt r0
y0
and
d 2f0
r0 a 2 b 2a ba b0
dr0 df0
(2.14)
dt dt dt
Using standard mathematical procedures, we can develop an equation for the radius
of the satellite’s orbit, r0, namely
p
r0
1 e cos 1f0 u0 2
(2.15)
t2
A 12
t3
A 34
E
t1
t4
FIGURE 2.5 Illustration of Kepler’s second law of planetary motion. A satellite is in orbit
about the planet earth, E. The orbit is an ellipse with a relatively high eccentricity, that is,
it is far from being circular. The figure shows two shaded portions of the elliptical plane in
which the orbit moves, one is close to the earth and encloses the perigee while the other
is far from the earth and encloses the apogee. The perigee is the point of closest ap-
proach to the earth while the apogee is the point in the orbit that is furthest from the
earth. While close to perigee, the satellite moves in the orbit between times t1 and t2 and
sweeps out an area denoted by A12. While close to apogee, the satellite moves in the orbit
between times t3 and t4 and sweeps out an area denoted by A34. If t1 t2 t3 t4 then
A12 A34.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 23
SIDEBAR
Kepler’s laws were subsequently confirmed, about 50 the concept of gravitational attraction. The work was
years later, by Isaac Newton, who developed a math- published in the Philosophiae Naturalis Principia
ematical model for the motion of the planets. New- Mathematica in 1687. At that time, Latin was the in-
ton was one of the first people to make use of differ- ternational language of formally educated people,
ential calculus, and with his understanding of gravity, much in the way English has become the international
was able to describe the motion of planets from a language of e-mail and business today, so Newton’s
mathematical model based on his laws of motion and Principia was written in Latin.
3. The square of the period of revolution of the smaller body about the larger body
equals a constant multiplied by the third power of the semimajor axis of the orbital
ellipse. That is, T 2 (4 2a3) where T is the orbital period, a is the semimajor
axis of the orbital ellipse, and is Kepler’s constant. If the orbit is circular, then a
becomes distance r, defined as before, and we have Eq. (2.6).
Describing the orbit of a satellite enables us to develop Kepler’s second two laws.
dA 0.5r 02 a b dt 0.5hdt
df0
(2.20)
dt
Remembering that h is the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum of the satellite,
the radius vector of the satellite can be seen to sweep out equal areas in equal times. This
is Kepler’s second law of planetary motion. By equating the area of the ellipse (ab) to
the area swept out in one orbital revolution, we can derive an expression for the orbital
period T as
T 2 14p2a3 2 m (2.21)
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 24
yo
ro
φo Perigee
Apogee a C O xo
ae
a (1 + e) a (1 − e)
FIGURE 2.6 The orbit as it appears in the orbital plane. The point O is the center of
the earth and the point C is the center of the ellipse. The two centers do not coincide
unless the eccentricity, e, of the ellipse is zero (i.e., the ellipse becomes a circle and
a b). The dimensions a and b are the semimajor and semiminor axes of the orbital
ellipse, respectively.
This equation is the mathematical expression of Kepler’s third law of planetary mo-
tion: the square of the period of revolution is proportional to the cube of the semimajor
axis. (Note that this is the square of Eq. (2.6) and that in Eq. (2.6) the orbit was assumed
to be circular such that semimajor axis a semiminor axis b circular orbit radius
from the center of the earth r.) Kepler’s third law extends the result from Eq. (2.6), which
was derived for a circular orbit, to the more general case of an elliptical orbit. Equa-
tion (2.21) is extremely important in satellite communications systems. This equation
determines the period of the orbit of any satellite, and it is used in every GPS receiver
in the calculation of the positions of GPS satellites. Equation (2.21) is also used to find
the orbital radius of a GEO satellite, for which the period T must be made exactly equal
to the period of one revolution of the earth for the satellite to remain stationary over a
point on the equator.
An important point to remember is that the period of revolution, T, is referenced to
inertial space, namely, to the galactic background. The orbital period is the time the or-
biting body takes to return to the same reference point in space with respect to the galac-
tic background. Nearly always, the primary body will also be rotating and so the period
of revolution of the satellite may be different from that perceived by an observer who is
standing still on the surface of the primary body. This is most obvious with a geostation-
ary earth orbit (GEO) satellite (see Table 2.1). The orbital period of a GEO satellite is ex-
actly equal to the period of rotation of the earth, 23 h 56 min 4.1 s, but, to an observer
on the ground, the satellite appears to have an infinite orbital period: it always stays in
the same place in the sky.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 25
a11 e2 2
r0 (2.22)
1 e cos f0
The angle 0 (see Figure 2.6) is measured from the x0 axis and is called the true anom-
aly. [Anomaly was a measure used by astronomers to mean a planet’s angular distance
from its perihelion (closest approach to the sun), measured as if viewed from the sun. The
term was adopted in celestial mechanics for all orbiting bodies.] Since we defined the pos-
itive x0 axis so that it passes through the perigee, 0 measures the angle from the perigee
to the instantaneous position of the satellite. The rectangular coordinates of the satellite
are given by
x0 r0 cos f0 (2.23)
y0 r0 sin f0 (2.24)
As noted earlier, the orbital period T is the time for the satellite to complete a rev-
olution in inertial space, traveling a total of 2 radians. The average angular velocity
is thus
If the orbit is an ellipse, the instantaneous angular velocity will vary with the position of
the satellite around the orbit. If we enclose the elliptical orbit with a circumscribed cir-
cle of radius a (see Figure 2.7), then an object going around the circumscribed circle with
a constant angular velocity would complete one revolution in exactly the same period
T as the satellite requires to complete one (elliptical) orbital revolution.
Consider the geometry of the circumscribed circle as shown in Figure 2.7. Locate
the point (indicated as A) where a vertical line drawn through the position of the satellite
intersects the circumscribed circle. A line from the center of the ellipse (C) to this point
(A) makes an angle E with the x0 axis; E is called the eccentric anomaly of the satellite.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 26
yo axis
A
a
yo
E
xo axis
C O xo
Orbit
Circumscribed Circle
FIGURE 2.7 The circumscribed circle and the eccentric anomaly E. Point O is the center of
the earth and point C is both the center of the orbital ellipse and the center of the circum-
scribed circle. The satellite location in the orbital plane coordinate system is specified by (x0,
y0). A vertical line through the satellite intersects the circumscribed circle at point A. The
eccentric anomaly E is the angle from the x0 axis to the line joining C and A.
and (x0, y0) of the satellite in the orbital plane. The process is as follows
1. Calculate using Eq. (2.25).
2. Calculate M using Eq. (2.30).
3. Solve Eq. (2.30) for E.
4. Find r0 from E using Eq. (2.27).
5. Solve Eq. (2.22) for 0.
6. Use Eqs. (2.23) and (2.24) to calculate x0 and y0.
Now we must locate the orbital plane with respect to the earth.
zi
penetrates the equatorial plane are called nodes; the satellite moves upward through
the equatorial plane at the ascending node and downward through the equatorial
plane at the descending node, given the conventional picture of the earth, with north
at the top, which is in the direction of the positive z axis for the earth centered coor-
dinate set. Remember that in space there is no up or down; that is a concept we are
familiar with because of gravity at the earth’s surface. For a weightless body in space,
such as an orbiting spacecraft, up and down have no meaning unless they are defined
with respect to a reference point. The right ascension of the ascending node is called
. The angle that the orbital plane makes with the equatorial plane (the planes inter-
sect at the line joining the nodes) is called the inclination, i. Figure 2.9 illustrates these
quantities.
The variables and i together locate the orbital plane with respect to the equato-
rial plane. To locate the orbital coordinate system with respect to the equatorial coordi-
nate system we need , the argument of perigee west. This is the angle measured along
the orbit from the ascending node to the perigee.
Standard time for space operations and most other scientific and engineering pur-
poses is universal time (UT), also known as zulu time (z). This is essentially the mean
solar time at the Greenwich Observatory near London, England. Universal time is meas-
ured in hours, minutes, and seconds or in fractions of a day. It is 5 h later than Eastern
Standard Time, so that 07:00 EST is 12:00:00 h UT. The civil or calendar day begins
at 00:00:00 hours UT, frequently written as 0 h. This is, of course, midnight (24:00:00)
on the previous day. Astronomers employ a second dating system involving Julian days
and Julian dates. Julian days start at noon UT in a counting system whereby noon on
December 31, 1899, was the beginning of Julian day 2415020, usually written 241 5020.
These are extensively tabulated in reference 2 and additional information is in reference
14. As an example, noon on December 31, 2000, the eve of the twenty-first century, is
the start of Julian day 245 1909. Julian dates can be used to indicate time by append-
ing a decimal fraction; 00:00:00 h UT on January 1, 2001—zero hour, minute, and
zi
Satellite
Perigee
yi
ω
Ω Ascending node
xi
FIGURE 2.9 Locating the orbit in the geocentric equatorial system. The satellite penetrates
the equatorial plane (while moving in the positive z direction) at the ascending node. The
right ascension of the ascending node is and the inclination i is the angle between the
equatorial plane and the orbital plane. Angle , measured in the orbital plane, locates the
perigee with respect to the equatorial plane.
c02.qxd 13/07/02 14:10 Page 29
second for the third millenium A.D.—is given by Julian date 245 1909.5. To find the
exact position of an orbiting satellite at a given instant in time requires knowledge of
the orbital elements.
Orbital Elements
To specify the absolute (i.e., the inertial) coordinates of a satellite at time t, we need to
know six quantities. (This was evident earlier when we determined that a satellite’s equa-
tion of motion was a second order vector linear differential equation.) These quantities
are called the orbital elements. More than six quantities can be used to describe a unique
orbital path and there is some arbitrariness in exactly which six quantities are used. We
have chosen to adopt a set that is commonly used in satellite communications: eccentric-
ity (e), semimajor axis (a), time of perigee (tp), right ascension of ascending node (),
inclination (i), and argument of perigee (). Frequently, the mean anomaly (M) at a given
time is substituted for tp.
Answer Equation (2.21) gives the square of the orbital period in seconds
T 2 14p2a3 2 m
Rearranging the equation, the orbital radius a is given by
a3 T 2m 14p 2 2
For one sidereal day, T 86,164.09 s. Hence
a3 186,164.12 2 3.986004418 105 14p2 2 7.496020251 1013 km3
a 42,164.17 km
This is the orbital radius for a geostationary satellite, as given in Table 2.1.
Answer The radius of the 250-km altitude Space Shuttle orbit is (re h) 6378.14 250.0
6628.14 km
From Eq. 2.21, the period of the orbit is T where
This orbit period is about as small as possible. At a lower altitude, friction with the earth’s atmos-
phere will quickly slow the Shuttle down and it will return to earth. Thus, all spacecraft in stable
earth orbit have orbital periods exceeding 89 min 30 s.
The circumference of the orbit is 2a 41,645.83 km.
Hence the velocity of the Shuttle in orbit is
2paT 41,645.835370.13 7.755 km/s
Alternatively, you could use Eq. (2.5): v (r)12. The term 3.986004418 105 km3/s2 and
the term r (6378.14 250.0) km, yielding v 7.755 km/s.
Note: If and r had been quoted in units of m3/s2 and m, respectively, the answer would have been
in meters/second. Be sure to keep the units the same during a calculation procedure.
A velocity of about 7.8 km/s is a typical velocity for a low earth orbit satellite. As the alti-
tude of a satellite increases, its velocity becomes smaller.
Answer The major axis of the elliptical orbit is a straight line between the apogee and perigee,
as seen in Figure 2.7. Hence, for a semimajor axis length a, earth radius re, perigee height hp, and
apogee height ha,
2a 2re hp ha 2 6378.14 1000.0 4000.0 17,756.28 km
Thus the semimajor axis of the orbit has a length a 8878.14 km. Using this value of a in Eq. (2.21)
gives an orbital period T seconds where
T 2 14p 2a 3 2 m 4p2 18878.072 33.986004418 105 s2
6.930872802 107 s2
T 8325.1864 s 138 min 45.19 s 2 h 18 min 45.19 s
The eccentricity of the orbit is given by e, which can be found from Eq. (2.27) by consider-
ing the instant at which the satellite is at perigee. Referring to Figure 2.7, when the satellite is at
perigee, the eccentric anomaly E 0 and r0 re hp. From Eq. (2.27), at perigee
r0 a11 e cos E 2 and cos E 1
Hence
re hp a11 e2
e 1 1re hp 2 a 1 7,378.148878.14 0.169
Navigation around the earth’s oceans became more precise when the surface of the globe
was divided up into a gridlike structure of orthogonal lines: latitude and longitude. Lat-
itude is the angular distance, measured in degrees, north or south of the equator and
longitude is the angular distance, measured in degrees, from a given reference
longitudinal line. At the time that this grid reference became popular, there were two
major seafaring nations vying for dominance: England and France. England drew its ref-
erence zero longitude through Greenwich, a town close to London, England, and France,
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Elements
of Geology; Adapted to the Use of Schools and
Colleges
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Language: English
ELEMENTS OF GEOLOGY;
BY
JUSTIN R. LOOMIS,
PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY AND GEOLOGY
IN WATERVILLE COLLEGE.
WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS.
BOSTON:
GOULD AND LINCOLN,
59 WASHINGTON STREET.
1852
Stereotyped by
HOBART & ROBBINS,
BOSTON.
PRESS OF G. C. RAND, CORNHILL, BOSTON.
PREFACE
In preparing the following work, it was intended to present a
systematic and somewhat complete statement of the principles of
Geology, within such limits that they may be thoroughly studied in
the time usually allotted to this science.
A sufficient number of leading facts has been introduced to
enable the learner to feel that every important principle is a
conclusion to which he has himself arrived; and yet, for the purpose
of compression, that fullness of detail has been avoided with which
more extended works abound. In furtherance of the same object,
authorities are seldom cited.
The consideration of geological changes is made a distinct
chapter, subsequent to the one on the arrangement of materials. It
should, however, be remembered that these processes of arranging
and disturbing are not thus separated in time. In nature the two
processes are always going on together.
It seemed important to exhibit the science with as much unity
and completeness as possible; and hence, discussions upon
debatable points in Theoretical Geology, so interesting to mature
geologists, would have been out of place here; and yet those more
intricate subjects have not been omitted. A large proportion of the
work is devoted to the explanation of geological phenomena, in
order to convey an idea of the modes of investigation adopted, and
the kind of evidence relied on. Where diversities of opinion exist,
that view has been selected which seemed most in harmony with
the facts; and the connection has not often been interrupted to
combat, or even to state, the antagonist view.
Technical terms have, in a few instances, been introduced, and
principles referred to, which are subsequently explained. The index
will, however, enable the student to understand them, without a
separate glossary.
Some may prefer to commence with the second chapter,
deferring the study of the elementary substances, minerals and
rocks, to the last. Such a course may be pursued without special
inconvenience.
Questions have been added, for the convenience of those
teachers who may prefer to conduct their recitations by this means.
But, when the circumstances of the case admit of it, a much more
complete knowledge of the subject will be acquired by pupils who
are required to analyze the sections, and proceed with the recitation
themselves; while the teacher has only to correct misapprehension,
explain what may seem obscure, and introduce additional
illustrations.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
1. Columnar Trap, New Holland. (Dana.)
2. The four divisions of rocks, and their relative
positions. A, Volcanic Rocks. B, Granite. 1, 2,
3, 4, Granite of different ages. C, Metamorphic
Rocks. D, Fossiliferous Rocks. (Lyell.)
Granite veins in slate, Cape of Good Hope.
3.
(Hall.)
4. Granite veins traversing granite. (Hitchcock.)
5. Extinct volcanoes of Auvergne. (Scrope.)
6. Lava of different ages, Auvergne. (Lyell.)
Strata folded and compressed by upheaval of
7.
granite.
8. Favosites Gothlandica.
9. Catenipora escharoides. (Chain coral.)
10. Caryocrinus ornatus. (Hall.)
11. Leptæna alternate. Orthis
testudinaria.
(Hall.)
Delthyris Niagarensis.
Section of a chambered shell, showing the
12.
chambers and the siphuncle.
13. Orthoceras.
14. Curved Cephalopoda, a, Ammonite; b,
Crioceras; c, Scaphite; d, Ancyloceras; e,
Hamite; f, Baculite; g, Turrilite. (Agassiz and
Gould.)
15. Trilobite.
16. Cephalaspis Lyellii. (Agassiz.)
17. Pterichthys oblongus. (Agassiz.)
Fault in the coal formation, a a, layers of coal,
18.
b b, surface and soil.
Stigmaria ficoides; Newcastle. (Lindley and
19.
Hutton.)
20. Trunk of sigillaria. (Trimmer.)
21. Bark of sigillaria. (Natural size.)
22. Sphenopteris crenata. (Lindley.)
23. Pachypteris lanceolata. (Brongn.)
24. Sigillaria levigata. (Brongn.)
Lepidodendron Sternbergii, Bohemia.
25.
(Sternberg.)
26. Calamite.
27. Heterocercal fish. Homocercal fish.
Impressions of Raindrops, Wethersfield, Conn.
28.
(Hitchcock.)
29. b, Bird tracks in the Conn. River Sandstone, a,
Consecutive tracks; c, Track of Cheirotherium
(probably a reptile), Penn. and Germany.
30. Section in the Isle of Portland. (Buckland.)
31. Apiocrinites rotundus, Bradford, Eng. (Miller.)
32. Gryphea incurva.
33. a, Outline of Ichthyosaurus; b, Plesiosaurus.
34. Pterodactyle.
a, Diploctenium cordatum; b, Marsupites; c,
35. Salenia; d, Galerites; e, Micraster cor-
anguinum. (Agassiz & Gould.)
b, Belemnite. a, Restored outline of the animal
36.
to which it belonged.
37. Cerithium intermedium.
38. Murex alveolatus.
39. Conus concinnus.
40. Nummulite.
41. Outline of paleotherium.
42. Outline of anoplotherium.
43. Skeleton of the mastodon.
44. Univalve with entire mouth.
45. Univalve with notched mouth.
46. Unimuscular bivalve.
47. Bimuscular bivalve.
Parallel planes of cleavage intersecting curved
48.
strata. (Sedgwick.)
49. a b, A vein of segregation; c d, A dike.
50. Faults and denuded strata.
51. Vertical conglomerate. (Lyell.)
Inclined strata in Dorsetshire, England.
52.
(Buckland.)
53. Dip of strata.
54. Axes and valleys in disturbed strata.
Curved strata of slate, Berwickshire, Eng.
55.
(Lyell.)
56. Folded strata.
57. Slope of mountains.
58. Europe at the Silurian epoch. (Guyot.)
59. Europe at the tertiary epoch.
60. Area of elevation and depression in the Pacific
and Indian Oceans. (Darwin.)
61. c c, Coral wall. (Trimmer.)
c c, Coral wall above the sea-level; c′ c′,
62.
Second coral wall.
63. Coral wall after partial subsidence.
Atoll. The coral wall only appearing. The
64.
original island entirely submerged.
Remains of the temple of Jupiter Serapis, near
65.
Naples.
Detached hills of old red sandstone, Rosshire,
66.
Scotland. (Lyell.)
67. Section of denuded strata, Mass. (Hitchcock.)
68. Grooved and striated surface of rocks.
69. Artesian wells.
70. Segregated masses in rocks.
Columnar form taken by basalt on
71.
solidification.
Layers of limestone now forming, San Vignone,
72.
Italy. (Lyell.)
73. Erosion of rock by the action of the waves.
74. Marine currents.
75. Sediment deposited in horizontal layers.
Section of greensand, Bedfordshire, Eng.
76.
(Lyell.)
Glacier, with lateral and medial moraines, a a,
77.
Terminal moraines.
78. Iceberg.
79. Volcanic Eruption. (Trimmer.)
80. Fractures produced by upheaval.
Fossiliferous rock altered by contact with
81.
granite.
Consecutive changes by which horizontal
82.
strata become vertical.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Page
CHAPTER I.
OF THE MATERIAL WHICH
COMPOSE THE CRUST OF THE
EARTH.
SECTION I.—ELEMENTARY
11
SUBSTANCES,
SECTION II.—SIMPLE MINERALS, 13
SECTION III.—THE MINERAL
MASSES WHICH FORM THE 16
CRUST OF THE EARTH,
CHAPTER II.
OF THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE
MATERIALS WHICH COMPOSE
THE CRUST OF THE EARTH.
SECTION I.—THE
21
CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS,
SECTION II.—THE PLUTONIC
23
ROCKS,
SECTION III.—THE VOLCANIC
25
ROCKS,
SECTION IV.—THE NON-
FOSSILIFEROUS STRATIFIED (OR 30
METAMORPHIC) ROCKS,
SECTION V.—THE
32
FOSSILIFEROUS ROCKS,
SECTION VI.—FOSSILS, 57
SECTION VII.—THE TIME
NECESSARY FOR THE
63
FORMATION OF THE STRATIFIED
ROCKS,
CHAPTER III.
OF THE CHANGES TO WHICH THE
CRUST OF THE EARTH HAS BEEN
SUBJECTED.
CHAPTER IV.
OF THE CAUSES OF GEOLOGICAL
PHENOMENA.
SECTION I.—ATMOSPHERIC
95
CAUSES,
SECTION II.—CHEMICAL ACTION, 97
SECTION III.—ORGANIC CAUSES, 101
SECTION IV.—AQUEOUS CAUSES, 103
SECTION V.—AQUEO-GLACIAL
120
ACTION,
SECTION VI.—IGNEOUS CAUSES, 127
CHAPTER I.
I. NON-METALLIC SUBSTANCES.
Oxygen. Hydrogen. Nitrogen.
Carbon. Sulphur. Chlorine.
Fluorine.
II. METALS.
Iron. Manganese.
III. METALLIC BASES OF THE EARTHS AND
ALKALIES.
Silicium. Aluminium. Potassium.
Sodium. Calcium. Magnesium.
These substances, chemically combined, form Simple Minerals.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
ebookbell.com