Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology

ISSN NO-2584-2706

A Review on Database Strategies for Optimizing

Microservices Architecture Performance
Anupam Chaube; Neeraj Kumar Jha
Pranay Ingole; Piyush Nandeshwar
Department of MCA, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering &
Management, Nagpur, India

Abstract applications into a collection of smaller

In order to provide scalability, agility, and independently deployable services, with each
dependability, database performance optimization concentrating on a particular business
is crucial as microservices architecture becomes capability [12]. The modular structure
the cornerstone of contemporary software provides advantages like continuous delivery,
development. Microservices decentralize data, autonomous scaling, and resilience over
which presents issues including consistency, conventional monolithic systems [11]. In spite
latency, and distributed query execution, in of all these benefits, microservices incur
contrast to monolithic systems. Polyglot additional complexities around data
persistence, indexing, caching, partitioning, management. Whereas monolithic systems
CQRS, and event-driven synchronization are depend upon centralized databases to ensure
some of the tactics examined in this study to consistency and manage transactions
improve performance in these kinds of settings. In economically, microservices often employ
this paper Author examines the effects of different service-specific, decentralized databases to
methods on system throughput, responsiveness, support service autonomy. This
and resource usage, drawing on both academic decentralization, although an advantage for
research and real-world applications. Author also modularity, complicates transactions between
discusses emerging concepts like container services, leads to data synchronizations, and
orchestration, serverless databases, and AI-driven adds latency at high loads or dynamic
tuning. The results provide practical advice for scenarios [2], [3], [10]. To solve these issues,
creating scalable, robust, and effective data layers different database approaches have been
in microservices ecosystems. suggested. Data partitioning, replication,
indexing, and sharding are some of the
Keywords: techniques that are widely used to improve
Microservices Architecture, Database throughput and minimize query latency in
Optimization, Scalability, CQRS, Caching distributed systems [6], [7]. Polyglot
Strategies persistence, where every service has a different
kind of database based on its workload (e.g.,
1. Introduction relational, NoSQL, graph), is also widely used
The software architecture evolution has forced for performance optimization and flexibility
a massive shift from monolithic systems to [5], [9]. Further sophisticated patterns, such
microservices-based architectures, propelled as Command Query Responsibility
by the demands for scalability, agility, fault Segregation (CQRS), event sourcing, and
isolation, and rapid deployment in eventual consistency, assist with loosening
contemporary software development. read/write operation coupling, accommodating
Microservices architecture (MSA) breaks asynchronous communication, and enhancing
IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 329
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204
 Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN NO-2584-2706

system responsiveness overall [6], [7]. A indexing, SQL restructuring, and logic
number of case studies also note the execution optimization. For a microservices-
advantages of orchestration software such as based accounting platform, API response time
Kubernetes and containerization platforms like was accelerated by 49.22% upon the inclusion
Docker in automating resource provisioning of indexing and bulk operations [7]. Executing
and scalability in microservices environments API logic and eliminating repetitive service
[2], [4]. Significantly logic execution calls, or logic execution optimization, boosts
optimization and indexing methods have been backend efficiency and throughput [6], [7].
proven to lower query response time by more
than 49% in microservices-based accounting 2.3. Event-DrivenCommunicationandData
systems, highlighting the need for smart data Synchronization
access routes [7]. Such findings place high Microservices tend to implement asynchronous
emphasis on the significance of well-planned messaging frameworks such as Kafka or
database approaches for realizing the RabbitMQ for communication among services.
maximum potential of microservices. This Such event-driven strategies allow eventual
paper brings together state-of-the-art practices, consistency and minimize system coupling [4],
case studies, and scholarly findings to [5]. For example, an order service can emit
determine efficient database approaches that events that cause subsequent updates in billing
enhance the performance, scalability, and fault or inventory services, enabling independent
tolerance of microservices-based systems. action by the services while they remain loosely
in sync [4].
2. Literature Review
Applying robust and effective database 2.4. CQRS and Event Sourcing
optimization techniques in microservices Command Query Responsibility Segregation
architecture yields technical and operational (CQRS) isolates write and read operations into
advantages with extensive reach. In addition to separate models and typically separate data
enhancing overall performance and latency stores, enabling each to scale separately.
reduction, these techniques enhance resiliency, Combined with event sourcing, where state
scalability, cost savings, and development changes are persisted as immutable events,
responsiveness. systems become stronger in auditability,
rollback, and performance [6], [10]. The
2.1 Decentralized Data Ownership And Polyglot patterns are gaining popularity for use within
Persistence financial and logistics applications requiring
Microservices promote decentralized data high availability and traceability.
ownership in which every service has its own
database. Decentralized data ownership enhances 2.5. Sharding,Partitioning,andCaching
fault isolation, flexibility of schema, and Microservices use database sharding and
independent scalability [5], [9]. In a scenario such partitioning methods to scale horizontally,
as an e-commerce system having various which split data between nodes or clusters,
databases for orders, payments, and stock, to enhancing concurrency and performance [3].
support various data models, polyglot persistence Caching technologies such as Redis or
is used—services use databases of their choice Amazon ElastiCache are employed to cache
suited best to them, e.g., MongoDB with flexible frequently read data, drastically minimizing
schemas or PostgreSQL with ACID-compliant latency in read-intensive workloads [4], [6].
transactions [5], [6]. These methods work exceptionally well in
distributed systems running on platforms such
2.2. Query Optimization and Logic Execution as AWS and Azure [3], [4].
Tuning
Performance benefits can be gained by 2.6. Integration of Infrastructure with AI-
applying query optimization methods such as Enabled Optimization

IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 330

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204
 Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN NO-2584-2706

Orchestration software such as Kubernetes execution, and caching have been effective in
removes database provisioning automation, practice. For example, in an accounting platform
replica management, and failure tolerance in built on microservices, using indexing and
containerized environments [1], [3]. Advanced optimizing SQL logic resulted in a 49.22%
resource-aware scheduler algorithms, including decrease in API response time [7], [6]. These
the Optimized PSO, dynamically balance advances directly affect the user experience and
microservice deployment to minimize latency enhance throughputs in data-intensive
and maximize throughput [2]. Also, AI-driven applications.
tools such as OPPerTune, which autotune
setting configurations in real-time with 3.2 Scalability and Resource Optimization
reinforcement learning, provide performance Database optimization allows microservices to
improvements in the form of a 50% reduction in scale independently according to their
P95 latency in production environments [8]. individual load, thus eliminating over-
Together, these innovations streamline provisioning and enhancing resource
infrastructure management and boost system utilization. Practices such as sharding and
reliability. polyglot persistence allow services to handle
data under heavy loads more efficiently [6],
[5]. Additionally, platforms such as
Kubernetes automate horizontal scaling and
resource allocation at the container level,
enhancing scalability and cost savings in
dynamic cloud environments [1], [3].

3.3 ImprovedFaultIsolationandSysteResilience
Distributed database ownership by services
restricts the effect of failure in a service. When
one service or its database crashes, the rest of
the system is still functional, improving fault
tolerance. Also, patterns such as event
sourcing and CQRS enable failure recovery
using event replay and consistent state renewal
Fig-1: Database Strategies for Optimizing [5], [10]. Lightweight centralized coordination
Microservices Architecture layers may improve failure handling in
distributed transactions [2].
3. Benefits of Optimized Database Strategies In
Microservices Architecture 3.4 Cost Optimization of Cloud Deployments
Application of database optimization methods in Optimized databases in cloud-native systems
microservices architecture is technical and minimize the cost of infrastructure by making
operationally advantageous. Apart from increasing optimal use of resources. Serverless databases,
performance and reducing latency, the methods autoscaling storage, and distributed caches
enhance resiliency, scalability, cost-effectiveness, (e.g., Redis, ElastiCache) minimize unused
and development velocity. Following are resource utilization and respond to varying
important benefits of employing such methods in workloads [4], [6]. Research demonstrates that
contemporary distributed systems. these can effectively reduce operational costs
while offering high performance.
3.1 BetterQueryPerformanceandLower Latency
One of the most direct benefits of database 3.5 Increased Architectural Flexibility with
optimization is better performance through lower Polyglot Persistence:
query execution times and system latency. Polyglot persistence allows services to
Methods like indexing, restructuring logic leverage specialist databases appropriate to

IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 331

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204
Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN NO-2584-2706

their functional requirements—e.g., document- calls for bespoke solutions to the individual
oriented databases for unstructured data or architecture. Standard optimization methods are
relational databases for transactional not always reliable because of varying query paths
consistency [2], [5]. Such flexibility enables and asynchronous communication patterns.
modular system design and harmonizes with 4.3 Network Latency and Inter-Service Overhead
heterogeneous technology stacks without Microservices by nature involve network
affecting performance or maintainability. communication, which comes with latency
particularly when data needs to be fetched
3.6 AgileDevelopmentand Quicker Deployment from distant databases or collected from
Improved database strategy supports faster several services. Even with the best
deployment and agile processes through seamless deployment strategies such as smart
integration with DevOps processes. Docker and scheduling and co-location, latency is still a
Kubernetes simplify database container major issue under heavy loads, as illustrated in
provisioning, whereas schema versioning and [6].
CI/CD pipelines minimize deployment friction
and facilitate quick rollbacks [1], [3]. What 4.4 Monitoring and Tracing Performance
follows is quicker development cycles and Bottlenecks Diagnosing and identifying
reduced database bottlenecks for developers. performance problems in distributed systems
is much harder than in monolithic
4. Challenges in Database Optimization for environments. Microservices produce
Microservices Architecture enormous amounts of logs and metrics, and it
Although database optimization greatly improves is hard to trace bottlenecks without the help of
performance in microservices-based systems, it sophisticated observability tools. Distributed
also brings with it a variety of architectural and tracing, centralized logging, and performance
operational complexities. These are due to the profiling are critical, but they need to be
distributed and decoupled nature of microservices, integrated and maintained with care across
the utilization of varied database technologies, services and infrastructure layers, [3] states.
and the complex consistency and scalability
requirements across isolated services. 4.5 Schema Evolving andHarmonofVersions
The reason that each service has its own
4.1 DistributedTransactionsandDataConsisteny database is that schema evolution is very hard.
One of the most serious issues is ensuring data Changes to the database schema must maintain
consistency between microservices, each having backward compatibility with downstream
its own independent database. In contrast to consumers and existing service APIs.
monolithic systems that support ACID properties Inconsistent application behaviour and broken
under a single transaction manager, distributed data contracts could be caused by sloppy
transactions are required in microservices, which schema migration handling, as discussed in
are more complicated and prone to errors. As [5].
shown in [2], techniques like Buffered
Serialization can be used to mitigate partial 4.6 Scaling Inequalities and Resource
failures but introduce more complexity in Competition
rollback, retry, and conflict handling. Poor allocation of resources can lead to CPU
or memory bottlenecks in case multiple
4.2 Highe Complexity in Query Optimization microservices are accessing shared
Database query optimization in a distributed infrastructure. This becomes particularly
architecture requires a better insight into inter- problematic in case database needs suddenly
service data flow and dependencies. As spike. While some issues were helped by
demonstrated in [7], reorganizing logic execution Kubernetes orchestration in [6], faulty replica
and API call optimization between services can distribution meant poor utilization and reduced
help enhance performance, but this effort usually cluster performance.

IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 332

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204
Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN NO-2584-2706

the foundation of modern distributed systems. The

4.7 OperationalOverheadandCostComplexiy latest and future trends in database administration
Although performance is improved through across microservices environments are echoed in
advanced techniques such as polyglot the results that follow.
persistence and caching, they add operational
complexity. Handling different database 5.1 PredictiveMonitoringandAIDriveOptimi
technologies, synchronization, and high zan
availability configurations need expert-level Artificial intelligence and machine learning
skills. As noted in [4], these needs add more technologies have the potential to
operational overhead and the possibility of revolutionize microservices database
misconfigurations or inconsistent failovers. administration. These technologies will drive
self-governing optimization cycles based on
TABLE 1. real-time telemetry for actively adjusting
Optimization Purpose / Associated configurations, identifying out-of-pattern
Category Benefit Challenges deviations, and avoiding performance loss. AI-
Needs powered observability tools will be a must in
service- the maintenance of service-level objectives in
Speeds up data
Query specific distributed and dynamic systems.
retrieval and
Optimization & tuning;
service
Indexing evolving
response. 5.2 Auto-Scaling and Serverless Database
models add
complexity Transition
Stale data Due to their ability to scale smoothly, abstract
Lowers risk; needs infrastructure complexity, and reduce
Caching & Data operating overhead, serverless database
latency and consistency
Replication
database load. and memory systems are increasingly being adopted. This
control. phenomenon enables development teams to
Improves focus on business logic as the platform takes
Adds
scalability care of elasticity, backup, replication, and
Sharding & complexity;
with availability for microservices. Serverless
Polyglot needs
workload- solutions will be the standard for backend
Persistence balanced
specific
shards. applications that need fast scaling and cost
databases.
Enables Adds dev
efficiency as adoption increases.
Asynchronous
decoupling complexity
Communication 5.3 Reactive, Event-Driven, and Eventually
and resilience needs strong
& Event Consistent Models
via event- consistency
Sourcing To enhance responsiveness and fault tolerance,
driven flow. handling.
Persistent microservices are gravitating toward event-
Containerization Eases scalable, storage and driven and reactive architectures and opting
& Infrastructure portable availability for asynchronous, non-blocking
Automation deployments. are hard to communication. Eventual consistency and
manage. real-time data streams are being enabled by
Requires event brokers such as Kafka and RabbitMQ
Schema Allows safe
careful along with ideas such as stream processing and
Management DB evolution
migration CQRS, especially in high-throughput sectors
such as finance, IoT, and e-commerce.
5. Insights and Trends for Future
Database methods will need to adapt in order to 5.4 CognitiveDataOrchestrationandDatabae-
meet growing demands for scalability, Aware
performance, flexibility, and resilience as Scheduling With increased adoption of
microservices architecture continues to evolve as container orchestration software such as

IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 333

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204
Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN NO-2584-2706

Kubernetes, there has been a spurt in but presents sophisticated problems in the
popularity toward database-aware decentralization of databases. This paper
orchestration as well as smarter scheduling. considered an assortment of database
Emerging schedulers would optimize not only optimization techniques—e.g., indexing, query
for CPU and memory but additionally for data tuning, refinement of logic execution, polyglot
locality, I/O behaviour, as well as latency persistence, caching, sharding, CQRS, and
sensitivity. Cleverer orchestration frameworks event-driven synchronization—to enhance
will also manage schema evolution, replication system performance, latency, and robustness.
of data, and storage provisioning dynamically. Though such strategies bring substantial
advantages, they are not without their
5.5 FederatedGovernanceModelsand Unified difficulties such as keeping data consistent,
Data Mesh coping with schema change, and coping with
Microservices database design is being driven by operational complexity in distributed
the data mesh model, which views data as a environments. The key is to pick and
product that is managed by domain teams. customize such strategies based on domain
Federated data ownership and self-serve data requirements and system scenarios. Upcoming
infrastructure will become ubiquitous in the trends—such as AI-powered optimization,
future and will allow for teams to operate serverless databases, data mesh architectures,
autonomously while maintaining shared and intelligent orchestration—are paving the
governance, quality, and compliance standards way towards the future of microservices data
across the company. management. Finally, the author concludes
that considering the database as a first-class
5.6 Hybrid and Multi-Model Database Systems architectural issue and always keeping it in
New multi-model databases enable flexibility and sync with system evolution is necessary to
infrastructure consolidation by supporting realize the full potential of microservices.
multiple data types (document, graph, and
relational) within a single engine. In addition, it 7. References
is predicted that hybrid systems—which erase the [1] A. S. Shethiya, “Scalability and
distinctions between transactional (OLTP) and Performance Optimization in Web Application
analytical (OLAP) loads—will become Development,” Integrated Journal of Science
widespread, enabling services to support deep and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2025.
analytics and real-time transactions without [2] A. Alelyani, A. Datta and G. M. Hassan,
duplicating data. “Optimizing Cloud Performance: A
Microservice Scheduling Strategy for
5.7 BetterGovernance,Security,and Compliance Enhanced Fault-Tolerance, Reduced Network
Security and regulation compliance are getting Traffic, and Lower Latency,” IEEE Access,
tougher as sensitive and decentralized information vol. 12, pp. 35135–35149, 2024.
is being dealt with by microservices. To satisfy [3] N. Suleiman and Y. Murtaza, “Scaling
evolving regulation requirements like GDPR, Microservices for Enterprise Applications:
HIPAA, and many others, the future database Comprehensive Strategies for Achieving High
designs will include fine-grained access control, Availability, Performance Optimization,
real-time auditing, encryption (at rest and in Resilience, and Seamless Integration,” Applied
transit), as well as automated compliance—all Research in Artificial Intelligence and Cloud
while maintaining system velocity. Computing, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 46–52, 2024.
[4] R. C. Thota, “Cost Optimization Strategies
6. Conclusion for Microservices in AWS: Managing
The migration to microservices architecture Resource Consumption and Scaling
has transformed contemporary software Efficiently,” International Journal of Science
systems by providing scalability, and Research Archive, vol. 10, no. 2, pp.
responsiveness, and independence of services 1255–1266, 2023.

IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 334

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204
Volume-3,Issue-5,May2025 International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology
ISSN NO-2584-2706

[5] G. Nookala, “Microservices and Data

Architecture: Aligning Scalability with Data
Flow,” International Journal of Digital
Innovation (IJDI), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023.
[6] V. B. Ramu, “Optimizing Database
Performance: Strategies for Efficient Query
Execution and Resource Utilization,” International
Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol.
71, no. 7, pp. 15–21, Jul. 2023.
[7] I. H. Al Ghozali, M. S. Antarressa and S.
Samidi, “Database Optimization Techniques with
Logic Execution Optimization on Microservices
Architecture,” Cogito Smart Journal, vol. 9, no. 1,
pp. 60–72, Jun. 2023.
[8] K. Munonye, “Approaches to Performance
Optimization, Interoperability, and Security in
Microservices,” Ph.D. dissertation, Budapest
University of Technology and Economics,
Hungary, 2023.
[9] G. Somashekar, “Performance Management of
Large-Scale Microservices Applications,” Ph.D.
Thesis Proposal, Stony Brook University, USA,
2023.
[10] F. Tapia et al., “From Monolithic Systems to
Microservices: A Comparative Study of
Performance,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 17,
p. 5797, 2020.
[11] M. Milić and D. Makajić-Nikolić,
“Development of a Quality-Based Model for
Software Architecture Optimization: A Case
Study of Monolith and Microservice
Architectures,” Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1824,
2022.
[12] G. Blinowski, A. Ojdowska and A. Przybyłek,
“Monolithic vs. Microservice Architecture: A
Performance and Scalability Evaluation,” IEEE
Access, vol. 10, pp. 20357–20373, 2022.
[13] D. Taibi, V. Lenarduzzi and C. Pahl,
“Architectural Patterns for Microservices: A
Systematic Mapping Study,” in Proc. 8th Int.
Conf. on Cloud Computing and Services Science
(CLOSER), pp. 221–232, 2018.

IJMSRT25MAY072 www.ijmsrt.com 335

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505204