Dynamic Stereochemistry of Chiral Compounds Principles and Applications 1st Edition Christian Wolf Download
Dynamic Stereochemistry of Chiral Compounds Principles and Applications 1st Edition Christian Wolf Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-stereochemistry-of-chiral-
compounds-principles-and-applications-1st-edition-christian-
wolf-2535618
Dynamic Play And Creative Movement Powering Body And Brain Judith Peck
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-play-and-creative-movement-
powering-body-and-brain-judith-peck-46191592
Dynamic System Modeling And Analysis With Matlab And Python For
Control Engineers Jongrae Kim
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-system-modeling-and-analysis-
with-matlab-and-python-for-control-engineers-jongrae-kim-46431456
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-light-scattering-spectroscopy-
of-the-human-eye-jeffrey-n-weiss-46462792
Dynamic Light And Shade How To Render And Invent Light And Shade The
Key To Threedimensional Form In Drawing And Painting Paperback Ed
Nachdr Burne Hogarth
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-light-and-shade-how-to-render-
and-invent-light-and-shade-the-key-to-threedimensional-form-in-
drawing-and-painting-paperback-ed-nachdr-burne-hogarth-46469312
Dynamic Simulation Of Sodium Cooled Fast Reactors 1st Edition G
Vaidyanathan
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-simulation-of-sodium-cooled-
fast-reactors-1st-edition-g-vaidyanathan-46502256
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-equivalent-modeling-of-acoustic-
metamaterials-solving-problem-of-noise-and-vibration-nansha-
gao-46787094
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-equations-and-almost-periodic-
fuzzy-functions-on-time-scalesisbn-9783031112355-chao-wang-47239080
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-posing-guide-1st-craig-stidham-
jeanne-harris-47437948
https://ebookbell.com/product/dynamic-models-for-volatility-and-heavy-
tails-with-applications-to-financial-and-economic-time-series-1st-
edition-andrew-c-harvey-47505908
Dynamic Stereochemistry of Chiral Compounds
Principles and Applications
Dynamic Stereochemistry of Chiral
Compounds
Principles and Applications
Christian Wolf
Department of Chemistry, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
ISBN: 978-0-85404-246-3
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes or for private study, criticism or
review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights
Regulations 2003, this publication may not be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of The Royal Society of Chemistry or the copyright owner, or in the case of
reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in
accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the appropriate Reproduction Rights Organization outside the
UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to The Royal Society of
Chemistry at the address printed on this page.
Since the pioneering work of Pasteur, Le Bel and van’t Hoff stereochemistry has evolved to a multi-
faceted and interdisciplinary field that continues to grow at an exponential rate. Today, dynamic
stereochemistry plays a fundamental role across the chemical sciences, ranging from asymmetric
synthesis to drug discovery and nanomaterials. The immense interest and activity in these areas
have led to the development of new methodologies and research directions in recent years. Chirality
plays a pivotal role in efforts to control molecular motion and has paved the way for microscopic
propellers, gears, switches, motors and other technomimetic devices. The concepts of Euclidian
chirality have been extended to topological chirality of fascinating mechanically interlocked
assemblies including rotaxanes, catenanes, and even molecular knots or pretzelanes. The impressive
advance of asymmetric synthesis has been accompanied by significant progress in stereochemical
analysis. Mechanistic insights into isomerization reactions and information about the conforma-
tional and configurational stability of chiral compounds are indispensable for today’s chemist, and
new techniques such as dynamic chromatography and stopped-flow procedures that complement
chiroptical and NMR spectroscopic methods have been established. A profound understanding of
the stability of chiral target compounds, intermediates and starting materials to racemization and
diastereomerization is indispensable for planning an efficient synthetic route. In many cases,
interconversion of stereoisomers compromises the efficacy of asymmetric synthesis and ultimately
results in the loss of stereochemical purity, but it can also be advantageous. While the usefulness
and scope of asymmetric transformations of the first and second kind have been known for a long
time, dynamic kinetic resolution, dynamic kinetic asymmetric transformation and dynamic ther-
modynamic resolution have become powerful synthetic alternatives. Many strategies that afford
excellent control of stereolabile substrates and reaction intermediates have been developed and are
nowadays routinely employed in the synthesis of a wide range of chiral compounds including
natural products. Asymmetric synthesis of complex target compounds generally entails incorpo-
ration of several chiral elements in addition to strategic carbon-carbon bond formation. Once
molecular chirality has been established it is often necessary to further manipulate it. Numerous
methods for selective translocation of a chiral element along an existing carbon framework or
interconversion of elements of chirality without loss of stereochemical purity have been introduced
and provide invaluable synthetic prospects. Both, the progress and the diversity of stereodynamic
chemistry, in particular asymmetric synthesis, are unrivaled and constantly fueled by an enormous
amount of new scientific contributions.
Over the last twenty years, several excellent books about asymmetric synthesis have appeared.
Traditionally, asymmetric synthesis is discussed based on (1) reaction types, for example aldol
v
vi Preface
A single monograph can not comprehensively cover the enormous scope and the many facets of
dynamic stereochemistry. Topics such as switching and amplification of chirality in polymers, gels
and liquid crystals had to be excluded due to limitations of space and time. In writing this book
during the last two and a half years, I have tried to adhere to well-defined and established
stereochemical terminology and emphasized important limitations and conflicting definitions in the
text. To assist the reader, a detailed glossary of stereochemical definitions and terms is included at
the end of the book, and a list of abbreviations and acronyms is provided at the beginning. All
topics are extensively referenced and the principal researcher is frequently named in the text to
encourage further reading and to facilitate additional literature search.
I would like to thank my colleagues, in particular Professors William H. Pirkle and the late
Wilfried A. König, and my students for continuing inspiration and helpful discussions. I wish to
thank Thomas J. Nguyen for the technical drawings illustrating the conceptual linkage between
macroscopic mechanical devices and their molecular analogs. And I am particularly grateful to my
wife Julia for her patience, encouragement and understanding during the endless hours involved in
writing this book.
Christian Wolf
Washington, DC
This book is dedicated to
my wife Julia
Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
References 4
ix
x Contents
3.3 Atropisomerization 84
3.3.1 Biaryls, Triaryls and Diarylacetylenes 85
3.3.2 Nonbiaryl Atropisomers 94
3.3.3 Cyclophanes 104
3.3.4 Atropisomeric Xenobiotics 107
3.4 Pharmacological and Pharmacokinetic Significance of Racemization 109
References 112
a axial
a0 pseudoaxial
AAA asymmetric allylic alkylation
Ab antibody
Ac acetyl
ac anticlinal
acac acetylacetonate
ACN acetonitrile
AD asymmetric dihydroxylation
Ad adamantyl
AE asymmetric epoxidation
AIBN azobisisobutyronitrile
Ala alanine
ap antiperiplanar
aq aqueous
Ar aryl
Asp aspartic acid
atm atmospheric pressure
ATP adenosine triphosphate
b0.5 peak width at half height
Bc butyryl
BHT 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol
Bn benzyl
Boc t-butoxycarbonyl, t-BuOC(O)-
BPDM benzphetamin N-demethylase
Bu n-butyl
Bz benzoyl
1C degree Celsius
c concentration; conversion
CAL Candida antarctica lipase
CAN cerium ammonium nitrate
Cat catalyst
Cb N,N-diisopropylcarbamoyl, (i-Pr)2NC(O)-
Cby 2,2,4,4-tetramethyloxazolidine-3-carbonyl
xiii
xiv Abbreviations and Acronyms
KR kinetic resolution
L liter; ligand; absolute configuration (Fischer-Rosanoff convention)
l length
LASER light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation
LDA lithium diisopropylamide
Leu leucine
LHMDS lithium hexamethyldisilazide
ln natural logarithm
LTMP lithium tetramethylpiperidide
LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
Lys lysine
M molar
(M) denotes left-handed helicity (CIP convention)
m milli
m meta
MC 3-methylcholanthrene
m-CPBA 3-chloroperbenzoic acid
Me methyl
MEKC micellar electrokinetic chromatography
Mes mesityl
Met methionine
min minute(s)
MOM methoxymethyl
MP mobile phase
MS mass spectrometry
Ms methylsulfonyl, CH3SO2-
MTBE methyl tert-butyl ether
N 0,1,2,3 . . .
n nano
n 1,2,3 . . .
nA population of state A
NADH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NADPH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NBS N-bromosuccinimide
Nf nonaflate, C4F9SO2-
NLE nonlinear effect
nm nanometer
NMO N-methylmorpholine N-oxide
NMR nuclear magnetic resonance
NOESY nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy
NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
Nu nucleophile
o ortho
obs observed
ORD optical rotary dispersion
Ox oxidation
(P) denotes right-handed helicity (CIP convention)
p para
PB phenobarbital
PCB polychlorinated biphenyl
Abbreviations and Acronyms xvii
Ph
PPh2 OH PPh2 O O Ph
P Ph
PPh2 OH PPh2 N N N O
Ph P
B
R R
BINAP BINOL BIPHEB BIPHOS BOX CBS oxazaborolidine
CO2Et CO2i-Pr
NH2
H OH H OH O
NH2 NMe2 PPh2
HO H HO H
OH O PPh2
CO2Et CO2i-Pr
DABN DAIB DET DIPT DIOP
Et
Et Et
Et
R N N N N
N N N N O O
P O O H H
R H H
Ph NH2 MeO O O OMe
R MeO OMe
P
Ph NH2 R N N
N N
DPEN DUPHOS (DHQD)2-PHAL (DHQD)2-AQN
C3F7 R R
hfc MTPA NOBIN PPFA salen
O O
R R
O PPh2 O PPh2 O OH Ph NHTs
O PPh2 O PPh2 O
N N O OH O
O R R Ph NHTs
O CF3
SEGPHOS sparteine SYNPHOS TADDOL tfc TSDPEN
xix
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
In 1848, Louis Pasteur, one of the pioneering stereochemists, recognized the omnipresence and
significance of chirality, which prompted his famous statement that the universe is chiral (l’univers
est dissymme´trique).1 Today, we know that chirality can indeed be encountered at all levels in
nature – in the form of the elementary particle known as the helical neutrino, inherently chiral
proteins, carbohydrates and DNA, or helical bacteria, plants and sea shells. Pasteur realized that
chiral objects exist as a pair of enantiomorphous mirror images that are nonsuperimposable and
related to each other like a right-handed and left-handed glove. At the molecular level, chirality
gives rise to enantiomers that can exhibit strikingly different chemical and physical properties in a
chiral environment. Many biologically active compounds, for example pharmaceuticals, agro-
chemicals, flavors, fragrances, and nutrients, are chiral, and more than 50% of today’s top-selling
drugs including Lipitor (cholesterol reducer, global sales in 2004: $12.0 billion), Zocor (cholesterol
reducer, $5.9 billion), Plavix (antithrombic, $5.0 billion) and Nexium (antiulcerant, $4.8 billion) are
sold as single enantiomers, Figure 1.1.
The increasing demand for enantiopure chemicals has been accompanied by significant progress
in asymmetric synthesis2–8 and catalysis,9–14 and by the development of analytical techniques for
the determination of the stereochemical purity of chiral compounds. Stereoselective analysis
usually entails chiroptical measurements,15 NMR and mass spectroscopic methods,16–18 electro-
phoresis,19 chiral chromatography20 or UV and fluorescence sensing assays,21–27 and it can provide
invaluable information about the stability of chiral compounds to racemization and dia-
stereomerization. A renowned example of a chiral drug that undergoes fast enantioconversion
under physiological conditions is thalidomide (Thalidomid, Contergan) which was prescribed to
pregnant women in the 1960s to alleviate morning sickness. One of the enantiomeric forms of
thalidomide does indeed have sedative and antinausea effects, but the other enantiomer is a potent
teratogen.i The racemic drug was approved in Europe for the treatment of pregnant women
suffering from nausea and its use caused severe birth defects. Even formulation of the pure
nontoxic (R)-enantiomer of thalidomide would have been unsafe because racemization takes place
in vivo and the teratogenic (S)-enantiomer is rapidly generated in the human body, Scheme 1.1.ii
Since the thalidomide tragedy, the significance of the stereochemical integrity of biologically
active compounds has received increasing attention and the investigation of the stereodynamic
i
Teratogenic agents interfere with embryonic development and cause congenital malformations (birth defects) in babies.
ii
Despite its inherent toxicity and stereochemical instability, thalidomide has recently been approved by the US Food and
Drug Administration under a specially restricted distribution program for cancer therapy and for the treatment of the
painful disfiguring skin sores associated with leprosy.
1
2 Chapter 1
OMe
O
H HO2C N O
N S N H
.. HO2C OH
N
OMe F
(S)-omeprazole (S)-ibuprofen (S)-flurbiprofen (S)-propranolol
(proton pump inhibitor used for (anti-inflammatory drug) (anti-inflammatory drug) (β-adrenergic blocker)
treatment of esophagitis, ulcer)
OH
HO2C NH2 CO2Et
O S
OH N N
N Cl MeO P S CO2Et
MeO
N
OH
(S)-DOPA (S)-bupivacaine (2R,3R)-paclobutrazol (S)-malathion
(neurotransmitter precursor used (local anaesthetic) (fungicidal agent) (insecticidal agent)
for treatment of Parkinson's disease)
O O O
N O N O N O
NH NH NH
O O O HO O O
(S)-(-)-thalidomide (R)-(+)-thalidomide
(teratogen) (sedative and antinausea agent)
properties of chiral molecules has become an integral part of modern drug development. For
example, a variety of 2-arylpropionic acids including ibuprofen (Advil), naproxen (Aleve), keto-
profen (Oruvail), and flurbiprofen (Ansaid) has found widespread use as pain relievers and
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The anti-inflammatory activity of these profens
resides primarily with the (S)-enantiomer.iii The enantiomers of flurbiprofen possess different
pharmacokinetic properties and show substantial racemization under physiological conditions.
Although (S)-naproxen is the only profen that was originally marketed in enantiopure form, in vivo
interconversion of the enantiomers of NSAIDs is an important issue in preclinical pharmacological
and toxicological studies.28 Another noteworthy example that underscores the significance of
racemization of chiral drugs is the potent gastric acid secretion inhibitor omeprazole (Prilosec)
which has been used in its racemic form for the treatment of esophagitis and ulcer.29 The active
form of this prodrug is an achiral sulfenamide derivative, and one could conclude that the presence
of a chiral center in omeprazole does not affect its pharmacological activity. Nevertheless, the
enantiomers of omeprazole have strikingly different pharmacokinetic profiles. The (S)-enantiomer
of omeprazole affords higher bioavailability in humans because the (R)-form is more readily
metabolized in the liver. To enhance the potency of this blockbuster drug, the pharmaceutical
industry has launched esomeprazole (Nexium), the pure (S)-enantiomer of omeprazole.
The unique structure and mode of action of the antibiotic glycopeptide vancomycin (Vancocin)
has fascinated synthetic and medicinal chemists alike. The antibacterial activity of vancomycin, i.e.,
iii
Some (S)-profens have distinct ulcerogenic properties that are increased in the presence of the (R)-enantiomer.
Introduction 3
its ability to inhibit cell wall biosynthesis, stems from its rigid macrocyclic structure which is crucial
for effective recognition and binding to the terminal D-alanine-D-alanine sequence of bacterial
peptides. The cup-shaped structure of vancomycin is a consequence of the chirality of the amino
acids in conjunction with the chiral axis of the actinoidinic acid moiety consisting of aryl rings A
and B and the planar chirality of aryl ethers C and E, Scheme 1.2. The stereodynamics of these
chiral elements have played a pivotal role in the total synthesis of the vancomycin aglycon (the part
of the glycopeptide lacking carbohydrate units).30–33 An intriguing example is Evans’ synthesis of
vancomycin from a bicyclic precursor bearing an unnatural (M)-actinoidinic acid moiety. Evans
and coworkers recognized that the axial chirality of the atropisomeric actinoidinic acid unit is
controlled by the global aglycon architecture, rather than by individual proximate stereogenic
elements. They also realized that rotation about the central C–C bond between aryl rings A and B
proceeds at ambient temperature and favors formation of the (P)-conformer with high selectivity.
In fact, thermal equilibration at 55 1C results in atropisomerselective interconversion of the two
diastereomeric tetrapeptides and establishes the desired axial chirality with 90% diastereomeric
excess. This thermodynamically controlled transformation significantly enhances the overall effi-
ciency of the total synthesis of vancomycin, Scheme 1.2. Similarly, Boger and others exploited
thermally controlled atropisomerization reactions which have been strategically incorporated into
several synthetic routes towards vancomycin and other complex antibiotics including teicoplanin.
HO
HO OH OPiv
HO OPiv
H 2N O OMs OMs
O O O
O C D C D
O HO Cl HO Cl
Cl H O O
H 55°C H H
O O N N N
NHTFA N
C D E O O NHTFA
HO Cl OH O
H O O O NH O NH O
H H B
N N N (P) B
N NH (M )
O MeHN MeHN
H A OH 95 : 5
O O NHMe OH A HO
NH O O
B HO HO OH
HO2C
NH2
A OH
OH
HO
Scheme 1.2 Structure of vancomycin (left), and stereoisomer interconversion favoring the formation of the
natural (P)-diastereoisomer of a tetrapeptide precursor (right).
The unique stereodynamics of chiral compounds have paved the way to artificial machines and
other molecular devices that lie at the interface of chemistry, engineering, physics, and molecular
biology. The design of gears, rotors, switches, scissors, brakes, shuttles, turnstiles, and even motors
showing unidirectional motion has certainly been inspired by the coordinated movement in
biological systems such as muscle fibers, flagella and cilia.34–36 Feringa and coworkers developed
light-driven molecular motors derived from sterically overcrowded chiral alkenes exhibiting ther-
mal bistability and nondestructive read-out.37,38 The subtle interplay between the chiral center and
the inherently helical conformation of this type of molecular motor provides control of the rotation
about the carbon–carbon double bond in a series of thermally and photochemically initiated
isomerization steps. In other words, both chirality and conformational flexibility are essential for
unidirectional motion of the rotor around the stator, Scheme 1.3. The first isomerization step
requires irradiation of UV light to a solution of the stable (3 0 S)-(P)-trans-form of the chiral alkene.
This generates a photostationary state favoring 69.4% of the unstable (3 0 S)-(M)-cis-form that
thermally relaxes to 94% of the stable (3 0 S)-(P)-cis-isomer in the second step. The same concept is
exploited for photoisomerization of the (3 0 S)-(P)-cis-alkene to 48.9% of the (3 0 S)-(M)-trans-isomer
4 Chapter 1
S S
Step 1
S photoinduced
OMe OMe
rotor isomerization
> 280 nm
S 30.6% : 69.4% S
3 stable (3′S)-(P)-trans-form unstable (3′S)-(M)-cis-form
4 2
thermal helix inversion at 55˚C thermal helix inversion at 55˚C
Step 4 Step 2
1 83.4% : 16.6% 6.0% : 94.0%
OMe
stator S S
S
Step 3
in the third step which is followed by thermal helix inversion to regenerate 83.4% of the (3 0 S)-(P)-
trans-isomer in the final step. Since the interconverting isomers exist as mixtures obeying
Boltzmann distributions and reversible reaction kinetics, this molecular motor is not rotating in
an exclusively monodirectional sense. However, the discrete and synergetic photochemical and
thermal isomerization reactions of the diastereomeric mixtures result in an overall clockwise
motion observed from the stator.
Since the discovery of the ubiquity of chirality by Pasteur, stereochemistry has undoubtedly
emerged as one of the most important and fascinating areas within the chemical sciences.
Stereochemistry embraces a broad variety of closely intertwined static and dynamic aspects that
are all related to the three-dimensional structure of molecules. While static stereochemistry deals
with the spatial arrangement of atoms in molecules and the corresponding chemical and physical
properties, dynamic stereochemistry emphasizes structural change and comprises asymmetric
reactions as well as interconversion of configurational and conformational isomers. The few
examples outlined above highlight both the significance of chirality and the fundamental role that
dynamic stereochemistry plays in modern chemistry, spanning multiple disciplines from asymmet-
ric synthesis and drug discovery to material sciences. The principles and applications of
stereodynamic chemistry of chiral compounds are discussed in the chapters following.
REFERENCES
1. Pasteur, L. Ann. Chim. Physique 1848, 24, 442-459.
2. Helmchen, G.; Hoffmann, R. W.; Mulzer, J.; Schaumann, E. Stereoselective Synthesis in
Methods of Organic Chemistry, Houben-Weyl, Vol. 21a-21f, 4th ed., Thieme, Stuttgart, 1995.
3. Gawley, R. E.; Aubé, J. Principles of Asymmetric Synthesis, Tetrahedron Organic Chemistry
Series, Elsevier, New York, 1996.
4. Ho, T.-L. Stereoselectivity in Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1999.
5. Lin, G.-Q.; Li, Y.-M.; Chan, A. S. C. Principles and Applications of Asymmetric Synthesis,
Wiley-VCH, New York, 2001.
6. Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2024-2032.
Introduction 5
Stereochemistry has evolved into a multi-faceted discipline, and numerous concepts and descriptors
have been introduced since the discovery and analysis of chiral organic compounds by van’t Hoff,
Le Bel and Pasteur in the nineteenth century. Unfortunately, the stereochemical terminology used
in the literature is not always well defined, and in some cases it can be ambiguous. The principles of
stereoisomerism and chirality and the relationship between reactivity and stereodynamics of chiral
compounds are discussed in this chapter and complemented with brief definitions in the glossary.
Cl Cl H2N Cl
Pt Pt CO2H HO2C
H2N NH2 Cl NH2 HO OH
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum trans-diamminedichloroplatinum
OH HO
diastereoisomers
diastereoisomers
(2R,3S)-2,3-dihydroxybutyric acid (2S,3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutyric acid
CO2H HO2C
HO OH enantiomers
HO2C CO2H
(R)-lactic acid (S)-lactic acid
OH HO
HO OH
enantiomers
(E)-2-butene (Z)-2-butene
enantiomers
diastereoisomers
OH O
Cl O
Br Et
O
NH2 OH
(R)-2-bromobutane (S)-1-phenylpropanol (R)-1-aminoindan (R)-2-chlorobutyric acid (S)-styrene oxide (1S,4R)-camphor
CO2H
OH
O CHO Me Ph H2N
OH HO
HO
O CH2OH H2N OH
(1R,2S,5R)-menthol (R)-2-methylsuccinic acid (R)-glyceraldehyde (1R,2S)-norephedrine (S)-leucine
O O O OR′′′
N N P P P P B
R R′′ R R′′ R R′′ R R′′ R OR′′ R OH RO OR′′
R′ R′ R′ R′ R′ R′ R′O
amines amine oxides phosphines phosphine oxides phosphinic esters phosphinous acids borates
R′′′ OH R′′′ R′′′
Si Si S S N P S
R R′′ R R′′ R O R O R R′′ R R′′ R R′′
R′ R′ R′ RO R′ R′ R′
silanes silanols sulfoxides sulfinic esters ammonium ions phosphonium ions sulfonium ions
Figure 2.3 Chiral compounds with stereogenic centers others than carbon atoms.
molecules may possess a rotation axis, but no symmetry plane, rotation-reflection axis and
inversion center. This criterion may be fulfilled by the presence of an asymmetric center or other
elements of chirality. Many organic compounds lack asymmetric atoms but possess axial, planar or
helical chirality. For example, substituted allenes, biphenyls, spiranes, and alkylidenecycloalkanes
have a chiral axis and exist in the form of two enantiomers. Certain ansa compounds,
8 Chapter 2
Cl H CO2H
H3C H3C CH3
•
Cl H H H
H
(S)-2,2'-dimethylbiphenyl (S)-1,3-dichloroallene (R)-4-methylcyclohexylideneacetic acid (S)-2,6-dimethylspiro[3.3]heptane (S)-spirobiindan
CO2H CO2H
O O
COCH3
Fe
(CH2)9
(S)-(E)-cyclooctene (R)-[2.2]paracyclophane- (R)-1,11-dioxa[11]cyclophane- (R)-1-acetyl-2-methyl-
carboxylic acid carboxylic acid ferrocene (P)-hexahelicene
CO2H HO2C
HO CO2H HO2C OH
HO OH
symmetry plane
OH HO
HO CO2H HO2C OH
HO2C CO2H
(R,R)-(+)-form (S,S)-(-)-form (R,S)-form (S,R)-form
diastereoisomers
N N N N N N N N
(R,R)-form (S,S)-form (R,S)-form (S,R)-form
diastereoisomers
Figure 2.5 The stereoisomers of tartaric acid (top) and 1,8-bis(2 0 -methyl-4 0 -quinolyl)naphthalene (bottom).
atom bearing four different substituents or a chiral axis does not necessarily render the molecule
chiral.
A discussion of the stereochemistry of chiral compounds requires a clear understanding of the
relevant nomenclature. The Cahn–Ingold–Prelog (CIP) rules are used to give an unambiguous
description of the absolute configuration of enantiomers and diastereoisomers.1,2 Because of its
importance, the CIP convention and the descriptors R, S, M, and P are explained below in some
detail, whereas definitions of other stereochemical terms can be found in the glossary. The
descriptors R, S, M, and P are applicable to all kinds of chiral elements. First, the priority of
the atoms attached to the chiral element is assigned based on the following sequence rules:
1. Atoms with a higher atomic number have a higher rank than atoms with a lower atomic
number. Note that the substituent with the lowest priority at a tetrahedral carbon atom may
be a hydrogen atom or a lone electron pair at a three-coordinate chiral heteroatom such as
nitrogen, phosphorus or sulfur. Isotopes with higher atomic mass number precede isotopes
with lower mass number, e.g., D 4 H and 13C 4 12C.
2. When two or more substituents are the same element, one has to compare atoms in the next
sphere until the priority of all groups has been established. It is important that all
substituents in a given sphere must be evaluated before one proceeds further away from
the core of the chiral element to the next array of atoms. Comparison of a dimethyl acetal
moiety with an ethoxy group shows that the former has a higher priority because it carries
two oxygens, in contrast to the ether moiety which bears only one oxygen atom. In other
words, all atoms in one sphere must be fully analyzed before one continues to the next
sphere. In the case of equal priority of a given sphere, one always proceeds by following the
branch of the highest priority until a rank can finally be assigned, Figure 2.6.
3. The rank of substituents carrying multiple bonds is established based on the principle of
ligand complementation. Multiple bonds are complemented by phantom atoms through
multiple representation of atoms that are doubly or triply bonded. An organometallic p-
complex is treated the same way. A metal carrying an alkene or alkine ligand is hypothet-
ically replaced by one (two) metal(s) attached to each end of the ligand, e.g., a palladium
p-complex bearing an olefinic group –CH¼CHR is represented by –C(Pd)H–C(Pd)HR. The
rule of ligand complementation is also applicable to polydentate and cyclic ligands. A cyclic
structure is disconnected and complemented with a phantom atom at the bonds where it
reduplicates itself. For example, the priority of the substituted pyrrolidine shown in Figure
2.7 is assigned by cutting the ring into two hypothetical branches with peripheral phantom
atoms in addition to the real branches. Disconnection at A gives –CH2NHCH2CH2(C)
having the highest priority because –CH2NHCH2CH3, the group that is assigned second
priority, carries a peripheral hydrogen which has a lower priority than a phantom carbon.
Disconnection at B results in the formation of –CH2CH2NHCH2(C), which has the lowest
rank. This case thus also illustrates that, for a given element, a real atom has precedence
over a phantom atom: –CH2CH2NHCH2CH3 4 –CH2CH2NHCH2(C).
(3)
(4 ) OMe (1) (3)
(2) OEt determines rank (2)
(Br > Cl) Br (1) OH (4) OH Cl
(R) OMe
(S)
Figure 2.6 Comparison of CIP spheres and determination of the branch of the highest priority.
10 Chapter 2
HN
HN
HN (3)
A ligand (S)
(4) (C) N
complementation (2)
B N H
H
N NH
(C) = phantom carbon
H (1) (C)
(3) (3)
(1) (4)
(1) OMe (4) OMe (2)
4. If ligands possess a different stereochemical environment and can not be distinguished based
on the above, the following rule applies: cis-configuration precedes trans-configuration,
Z 4 E, R 4 S, M 4 P, Figure 2.8.
The CIP rules described above give the following priority of common functional groups:
Once the priority of the substituents or groups around the chiral center is established, the
molecule is viewed in such a way that the moiety with the lowest priority is placed behind the
central atom. The three remaining substituents or groups are thus oriented towards the viewer and
afford a tripodal arrangement. If the sense of direction following the established priority of these
three substituents describes a clockwise rotation, (R)-configuration (for Latin rectus, right) is
assigned. If the rotation is counterclockwise, the chiral center has (S)-configuration (for Latin
sinister, left), Figure 2.9.
This nomenclature can also be applied to compounds possessing a chiral axis or plane. In both
cases the priority of substituents must be assigned with the help of an additional CIP rule, which
specifies that the groups on an arbitrarily chosen side of a chiral axis or plane always precede
substituents on the other side of the stereogenic element. It is helpful to view the chiral axis of
biphenyls, allenes and spiro compounds as a stretched tetrahedron. Because of the inherently lower
symmetry of a stretched tetrahedron compared to a regular tetrahedron, it does not require the
presence of four different substituents to constitute a chiral axis. For example, 2,2 0 -dimethyl-
biphenyl is chiral. The symmetric substitution pattern gives rise to a C2-symmetric structure, but
incorporation of the same substituents to a tetrahedral carbon generates an achiral compound with
a symmetry plane. To assign the CIP descriptor to an axially chiral compound, one can choose
either side of the chiral axis to determine the first two priorities. This side always has precedence
over the opposite side. Then the remaining ranks are assigned on the side of lower priority, and the
clockwise (Ra) or counterclockwise (Sa) sense of rotation is established. Some classes of com-
pounds, including (E )-cycloalkenes, cyclophanes and metallocenes, display a planar aryl or alkene
group that may have one or several substituents residing outside that plane. A substitution pattern
that destroys a perpendicular symmetry plane or an inversion center establishes planar chirality.
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 11
(3) (2)
H (4) (4) (4)
(3) HO2C H (2)
C P S •
(3) Cl I (1) (3) Me (3) Me
Ph (1) O (1) (4) H CO2H (1)
(2) Br (2) Et (2) t-Bu (4) (1)
(S )-bromochloroiodomethane (S)-ethylmethylphenylphosphine (S)-tert-butylmethylsulfoxide (P)- or (S)-glutinic acid (P)- or (S)-2,2'-dimethylbiphenyl
CO2H
(3)
(M)
(2) atom of highest
(1) Fe Fe (1)
precedence (P)
pilot atom (2)
(3) (4)
(P)- or (R)-[2.2]paracyclophane- (S )-2-ethyl-1,4-dimethylferrocene
carboxylic acid (M )-hexahelicene meso decahelicene
Figure 2.9 Description of axial, planar and helical chirality based on CIP rules. Chiral axes of symmetrically
substituted biaryls, allenes and spiro compounds are arbitrarily viewed from the right-hand side
to assign CIP priorities.
To assign CIP descriptors for molecules with a chiral plane, one views the plane from the so-called
pilot atom which is the out-of-plane atom closest to the stereogenic element. The arrangement of
the next three subsequent atoms located in the chiral plane determined according to the CIP rules
will either describe a clockwise (Rp) or a counterclockwise (Sp) rotation.ii Although metallocenes
exhibit planar chirality, they are conventionally treated as molecules with a chiral center. First,
bonds between the p-donor and the metal atom are complemented as described above and the atom
of the highest priority is determined. The asymmetric environment of this tetrahedral atom is then
analyzed using the CIP rules to assign the absolute configuration, Figure 2.9.
As mentioned above, molecules with a helical shape may also be chiral. The sense of helicity is
described as right-handed (P) if it resembles a screw that rotates clockwise away from the viewer,
and left-handed (M ) if the rotation is counterclockwise. While hexahelicene exists in the form of
two enantiomers, decahelicene has two stereogenic elements, i.e., two helical turns, which gives rise
to a pair of (P,P)- and (M,M )-enantiomers and a meso (M,P)-isomer having an inversion center,
Figure 2.9. The sense of chirality in molecules with a stereogenic axis or plane may also be
characterized using descriptors M and P. For axially chiral compounds, only the substituents of the
highest CIP rank on each side of the stereogenic axis (denoted 1 and 3 in Figure 2.9) are considered.
After determination of these two substituents, one views the molecule along the chiral axis from an
arbitrarily chosen side. The helical descriptors are then assigned through rotation of the front
substituent in direction to the substituent located at the rear of the axis. The descriptor P denotes a
clockwise rotation, whereas M is assigned in the case of a counterclockwise rotation. In order to
assign helical descriptors to a chiral plane, one looks from the pilot atom at the subsequent atoms
using the CIP convention. Again, the descriptor P refers to a clockwise rotation and M to a
counterclockwise movement. Application of the two conventions to axially chiral compounds
reveals that descriptors Ra and M, as well as Sa and P, correspond to each other. In the case of
planar chirality, the descriptors Rp and P, and Sp and M, respectively, are synonymous.
ii
The use of suffixes a and p to indicate axial and planar chirality is optional.
12 Chapter 2
(a) (b)
+ +
Figure 2.10 Achiral (a) and chiral (b) catenanes devoid of classical elements of chirality.
achiral thread H H
N N
atom with second
highest CIP priority O O
O
O2
S
N N
H H O2 O
S
atom with highest atom with second N N
CIP priority highest CIP priority H H
(S)-[2]rotaxane (R)-[2]rotaxane
H H H H
O N N N N O
O2 O2
O O S S O O
N N N N
H H H H
O2 O O O2
S S
N N N N
H H H H
axial vector shows axle directionality (S)-configuration (R)-configuration axial vector shows axle directionality
polar vector shows wheel directionality polar vector shows wheel directionality
ring A ring B
H H H H
N N N N
O O O O
O O
H H
N O O N
O
O O
O2 O O O2
S S
N N N N
H H H H
axle (no directionality)
amino acid sequence and connectivity of stereogenic centers exhibiting both (R)- and (S)-configur-
ation in cyclopeptides give rise to cycloenantiomers and cyclodiastereoisomers, Figure 2.14. The
presence of ring directionality in cyclopeptides consisting of both enantiomers of one amino acid
does not change the overall number of possible stereoisomers, i.e., a cyclic peptide exists in as many
stereoisomers as the open chain form. Mislow therefore suggested that the term cyclostereoiso-
merism should be restricted to cases in which ring directionality generates additional stereoisomers,
and demonstrated that this can be achieved with hexaisopropylbenzene derivatives. For instance,
14 Chapter 2
(R)-[2]catenane
HN NH O polar vector
N NH
O O
H O of B
HN NH
O MeO MeO
(R)-configuration
O
O H O2S
MeO O2S N NH
atom with highest HN NH O polar vector
O
O2S CIP priority of A
HN NH
atom with second highest
CIP priority axial vector of B
ring B (R)-configuration
ring A
Figure 2.13 Assignment of the absolute configuration of a [2]catenane based on CIP rules.
Me H H Me
H H H H
Cl Cl
N N Br H Br
H Br
HN (R) Me Me (S) NH Br
(S) (R) H (R) (R) H
Me Me Cl Cl (S)
O O (S)
Me H H Me
O O NH HN O O
H (S) (R) H Me Me
O (S) (R) Me
HN O H H O O NH Me
O O H Me Me H
Me Me
(S) (R) Me H H Me
Me (R) NH HN (S) Me
N N Me Me
H H H Me Me Me
Me H
H H
H Me Me H
cyclohexaalanine 1,2-bis(bromochloromethyl)-3,4,5,6-tetraisopropylbenzene
N N
N N N
N N N N N N N N
= ethylenediamine (en)
Co Co
N N N N
N
N N N N N
N = threefold rotation axis
N ∆-[Co(en)3]3+ Λ-[Co(en)3]3+ N
right-handed screw left-handed screw
iii
The enantiomers of 2,2 0 -diiodobiphenyl show on-column racemization during HPLC separation on triacetyl cellulose at
ambient temperatures. Pure enantiomers of 2,2 0 -diiodobiphenyl can be isolated if the chromatographic process is rapid, but
racemization occurs upon standing or during HPLC if the separation process is slow.
16 Chapter 2
t-Bu t-Bu
F N
C P
Cl I Me
Ph
Br Bu N t-Bu t-Bu
(S)-bromochlorofluoro- (S)-butylmethylphenyl- (S,S)-Tröger's base (S)-2,2'-di-tert-butylbiphenyl rotation about the axis of
iodomethane phosphine 3,3'-di-tert-butylbiphenyl
O O
Et N N • O N
Pr N
Me N N
N N
Me
Pr
Et
N-inversion of ethylmethylpropylamine electrocyclic ring opening and isomerization of 1-(2'-methylphenyl)-4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-one
Figure 2.16 Chiral compounds exhibiting conformational or configurational isomerism and racemization
mechanisms.
1-arylpyrimidine-2-thiones and their oxygen analogs can be conveniently isolated by chiral chro-
matography but undergo racemization during [3,3]-electrocyclic rearrangement involving ring
opening and bond breaking at elevated temperature.14,15 Clearly, the stability and bond-breaking
criteria are vague and sometimes incompatible.
Alternatively, configurational isomers have been defined as stereoisomers possessing different
bond angles while conformers differ in torsion angles. It should be noted that bond and torsion
angles can vary in amplitude and sign. For example, the enantiomers of butyl-
methylphenylphosphine display bond angles of the same value, albeit with opposite sign. As the
relative stability becomes irrelevant, the enantiomers of compounds with a chiral center, including
Tröger’s base and ethylmethylpropylamine, are considered configurational isomers. All axially
chiral biaryls mentioned above afford conformational enantiomers, irrespective of their rotational
energy barrier or isomerization mechanism. One shortcoming of this classification is that (E)- and
(Z)-alkenes, or the enantiomers of allenes and (E)-cycloalkenes, having a chiral axis or plane may
thus be regarded as conformational isomers. This seems somewhat counterintuitive to many
chemists. Both definitions are commonly used in the literature to classify stereoisomers. Since the
stability criterion and the corresponding isolation conditions are not clearly defined, and are
problematic in some cases, the distinction between configurational and conformational isomerism
in the present book is based on differences in bond and torsion angles, respectively.
Organic compounds often exist as a mixture of constantly interconverting conformational
isomers. In many cases, achiral compounds populate both achiral and racemic chiral conforma-
tions at equilibrium. As has been discussed above for tartaric acid, 2,3-diaminobutane has two
chiral centers and forms three configurational isomers, i.e., a meso (2R,3S)-isomer and a pair of
enantiomers with (2R,3R)- and (2S,3S)-configuration. A comparison of the chemical and physical
properties of acyclic configurational stereoisomers requires analysis of the corresponding mixtures
of fluxional conformers. A closer look at the three-dimensional structure of meso 2,3-diamino-
butane reveals that it adopts three conformational isomers, with torsion angles varying in either
magnitude or sign. The meso isomer can populate an achiral antiperiplanar and two enantiomeric
synclinal conformers that rapidly rotate about the central carbon–carbon bond at room tempera-
ture, while (2R,3R)-2,3-diaminobutane and its enantiomer are inherently chiral and exist as a
mixture of three interconverting diastereomeric rotamers, Figure 2.17. The ratio of the achiral to
the two equienergetic chiral conformations of meso 2,3-diaminobutane can be expected to change
with temperature and to vary in the gas, liquid and solid state, but the mixture is always racemic in
the absence of a chiral bias. It is important to realize that facile rotation about the carbon–carbon
bond in compounds such as meso 2,3-diaminobutane generates enantiomeric conformational
isomers that become diastereomeric in a chiral environment; in other words, the presence of a
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 17
diastereoisomers
diastereoisomers
Figure 2.17 Newman projection of the conformational isomers of (2R,3S)- and (2R,3R)-2,3-diaminobutane.
R R
E R
(M)-biphenyl (P)-biphenyl
R R R R
R R R R
anti-form syn-form syn-form anti-form
nonracemic chiral additive can disturb the equilibrium between the enantiomers. Chelating inter-
actions of meso (2R,3S)-2,3-diaminobutane with an achiral compound, for example maleic acid,
selectively stabilizes and thus favors synclinal conformations over the antiperiplanar rotamer, but it
does not change the racemic equilibrium. By contrast, hydrogen bond interactions or salt formation
with a chiral acid such as (2R,3R)-tartaric acid render the enantiomeric conformers of meso
2,3-diaminobutane diastereomeric and selectively favor one over the other.
Axially chiral biphenyls undergo racemization via rotation about the pivotal aryl–aryl bond, see
Chapter 3.3. In the ground state conformation, the aryl planes are neither coplanar nor orthogonal
due to a compromise between resonance stabilization and steric interactions. While coplanarity of
the aromatic rings would maximize resonance stabilization, it would also cause severe repulsion
between ortho-substituents. The steric interactions between ortho-substituents are minimized in an
orthogonal geometry, but at the expense of p-electron overlap which decreases with the cosine
of the torsion angle. As a result, the enantiomers of 2,2 0 -disubstituted biaryls populate two
diastereomeric syn- and anti-conformations, with torsion angles in solution usually ranging from
30 to 80 1, and 100 to 150 1, respectively. In most cases, the anti-form is thermodynamically more
stable but 2,2 0 -dihalobiphenyls have been reported to prefer the syn-conformation.16,17 A typical
energy profile of 2,2 0 -disubstituted biphenyls is shown in Figure 2.18.iv
It is therefore not surprising that conformational equilibria of acyclic and cyclic compounds
affect the stereochemical outcome of asymmetric transformations, see Chapters 6.5 and 6.6. A well
iv
Incorporation of sterically demanding substituents into the ortho-positions of biphenyl significantly increases the energy
barrier to rotation and favors a near-orthogonal ground state geometry.
18 Chapter 2
Cram's rule Br
X
Mg
Ph
R′ M BrMgO Ph O
O O O OMgBr H CH3
(S) Si-face
S M (S) H CH3 PhMgBr H CH3
(R) attack
Ph Me Ph
Ph Ph Me
L Ph Me Ph
R 80% de favored transition state
Scheme 2.1 Rationalization of the stereoselectivity of 1,2-nucleophilic additions to chiral ketones, based on
Cram’s rule.
known example is the asymmetric 1,2-addition of organometallic reagents and hydrides to carbonyl
compounds possessing an adjacent chiral center. The diastereofacial selectivity of a nucleophilic
addition to a chiral ketone depends on the conformational dynamics of the substrate, and a variety
of models that attempt to predict the selectivity of such 1,2-asymmetric inductions has been
developed. A powerful rationale was introduced by Cram.18 Assuming a noncatalytic, kinetically
controlled reaction, and disregarding electronic effects and the Curtin–Hammett principle, Cram
reasoned that the stereoselectivity of nucleophilic attacks on acyclic ketones and aldehydes could be
rationalized by considering a single substrate conformation. He postulated that the substrate
resides throughout the reaction in a preferred conformation having the largest substituent L
attached to the chiral center antiperiplanar to the adjacent carbonyl function. The organometallic
reagent then approaches the carbonyl group from the less sterically hindered side with the smallest
substituent S because the medium-sized substituent M affords greater steric hindrance, Scheme 2.1.
The diastereoselectivity of the Grignard reaction between phenylmagnesium bromide and (S)-
3-phenylbutan-2-one can be rationalized by looking at the Newman projection of the favored
transition state. Since the proton provides less steric hindrance than the methyl substituent,
phenylation occurs preferentially from the Si-face, producing (2R,3S)-2,3-diphenylbutan-2-ol in
80% diastereomeric excess. This simple but powerful rationale was later extended to the so-called
Cram chelation model to accurately predict the selectivity of a nucleophilic attack on chiral
substrates that possess a stereocenter bearing a heteroatom in a- or b-position to the carbonyl
function.19 Cram and others showed that a-alkoxy ketones and Grignard reagents form a cyclic
structure having the alkoxy group synperiplanar to the carbonyl function, Scheme 2.1. The
restricted conformational freedom leads to a highly diastereoselective transition state in which
the nucleophile is delivered from the less sterically hindered face exhibiting the smaller ligand S. In
contrast, attack from the opposite side is impeded by the presence of the larger ligand L. For
example, formation of an intermediate dimethylmagnesium complex of (S)-2-methoxy-1-phenyl-
propanone effectively locks the substrate into a single conformer and thus restricts the number of
possible transition states, which increases stereoselectivity. Comparison of the diastereotopic faces
of the five-membered chelate explains why the nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl moiety
preferentially occurs from the Si-face, yielding (2R,3S)-3-methoxy-2-phenylbutan-2-ol in excellent
diastereomeric excess.20
The preceding discussion, and additional examples given in Chapters 5, 6 and 7, emphasize the
importance of careful stereodynamic analysis of chiral substrates, reagents and catalysts for
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 19
N N N N
O O O O
(S) (P) (P) (P) (P)
O O CHO
N O
O (M) (M)
Ph O O
N N
PhMgBr, -78 oC
N N N N
O O O O OH
(S) (P) (P) (P) (P) 77%, 95% de
O O
N O (S) Ph
O (M) (M)
Ph O O
N N
25 Å
Scheme 2.2 Remote stereocontrol and asymmetric induction via conformational communication along a
tris(xanthenedicarboxamide) relay.
20 Chapter 2
ee aa ee aa ee aa
∆G = 11.5 kJ/mol
o
∆G = 15.5 kJ/mol
o
∆G = 11.5 kJ/mol
o
Figure 2.19 Relative stability of configurational (top) and conformational isomers (bottom) of dimethyl-
cyclohexanes. The more stable isomer is underlined.
robust atropisomeric array and controls the outcome of diastereoselective reactions at the remote
aldehyde group located at the other terminus. Grignard reaction with phenylmagnesium bromide at
–78 1C gives the corresponding secondary (S)-alcohol in 77% yield and 95% de as a consequence of
[1,23]-asymmetric induction over a distance of 2.5 nm.
The high degree of rotational freedom inherent to acyclic molecules allows effective minimization
of steric and torsional strain. Cyclic molecules experience less conformational flexibility to balance
both factors. The stereodynamic behavior of cyclic molecules is more restricted than that of acyclic
compounds, and is controlled by torsion (Pitzer) and angle (Baeyer) strain, and other stabilizing or
destabilizing forces such as hydrogen bonding, dipole–dipole interactions and 1,3-syndiaxial or
1,4-transannular repulsion. Three-membered and a few four-membered rings are flat while the ring
geometry of all other cycloalkanes is nonplanar and usually quite fluxional. Puckering of four-
membered rings is common and reduces torsion strain, albeit at the expense of some angle strain.
Five- and six-membered rings form envelope and chair conformations to balance torsion and angle
strain. As a consequence, substituents can occupy equatorial or axial positions, and this generates a
variety of stereoisomers.
Monosubstitued cyclohexanes are achiral but exist as a mixture of two diastereomeric chair
conformations that rapidly interconvert at room temperature via ring inversion. Isomerization of
one chair to the other proceeds via transient boat and twist conformations, converting axial into
equatorial positions and vice versa.31 In general, the chair bearing the substituent in equato-
rial position is thermodynamically favored. Disubstituted cyclohexanes can have cis- or trans-
configuration. In the case of cis-1,2-, trans-1,3-, and cis-1,4-cyclohexanes, one substituent occupies
an axial and the other an equatorial position. By contrast, the corresponding trans-1,2-, cis-1,3-,
and trans-1,4-disubstitued isomers interconvert between diaxial and diequatorial chair conforma-
tions, the latter being thermodynamically favored, with the exception of some diaxial cis-1,3-
disubstituted cyclohexanes that are stabilized by intramolecular interactions such as hydrogen
bonding and trans-1,2-dihalocyclohexanes which preferentially populate the diaxial conformation,
Figure 2.19. In particular, intramolecular hydrogen bonding can have a dramatic effect on the
relative stability of conformational isomers. Spectroscopic analysis of the stereodynamics of
methyl-b-D-2,4-di-O-pyrenecarbonylxylopyranoside by Yuasa and coworkers revealed that the
4
C1-conformer of this carbohydrate exhibiting all four substituents in equatorial positions is
favored over the 1C4-conformation in DMSO and methanol, Scheme 2.3.32 However, intra-
molecular hydrogen bonding between the free hydroxyl and the methoxy group stabilizes the
1
C4-conformation and excimer formation in chloroform and other aprotic solvents. The ring flip is
therefore controlled by intramolecular hydrogen bonding and the presence or absence of solvents
that interfere with this interaction.
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 21
4 1
C1-conformer C4-conformer H OMe
O O
O
O
O
HO OMe
O O O O O
CHCl3
O DMSO
All trans-1,2- and trans-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexanes are chiral, even when the two substituents
are identical. In these cases, ring flipping does not result in racemization and the enantiomers are
isolable at room temperature. For example, ring inversion of the diequatorial isomer of trans-1,2-
diaminocyclohexane generates the corresponding diaxial conformer but it does not produce a
mirror image, Figure 2.20. The situation is different in cis-1,2- and cis-1,3-disubstituted cyclohex-
anes. Although cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane is inherently chiral, the enantiomeric conformers can
not be isolated at room temperature due to rapid interconversion via chair inversion. The diaxial
and diequatorial isomers of cis-1,3-diaminocyclohexane possess a symmetry plane and are achiral.v
Introduction of different substituents into 1,2- and 1,3-disubstituted cyclohexanes provides a
mixture of separable stereoisomers, e.g., cis- and trans-1-amino-2-methylcyclohexane exist as two
pairs of noninterconverting enantiomers. The conformations of cis- and trans-1,4-disubstituted
cyclohexanes have a plane of symmetry and are generally achiral.
Nucleophilic additions to 4-substituted cyclohexanones often proceed with low selectivity
because of the conformational flexibility of the six-membered ring and weak stereoselective
induction from the remote substituent. However, the sterically demanding tert-butyl group prefers
to reside in the equatorial position and effectively locks 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone into one
conformation, which in most cases improves diastereoselectivity. Since the contribution from the
less stable cyclohexanone conformer having the tert-butyl group in the axial position is negligible,
the prediction of diastereoselective reactions of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone is simplified and requires
stereochemical analysis of only a single conformer. Most nucleophiles including Grignard and
organolithium reagents approach the carbonyl group at an angle close to 109 1 (Bürgi–Dunitz
trajectory) from the site opposite to the bulky tert-butyl group. Reetz and Stanchev obtained the
axial carbinol via organiron(II)-mediated diastereofacial addition of butylmagnesium chloride in
76% de. This is generally attributed to a less shielded equatorial attack on the carbonyl of the
predominant conformation of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone, Scheme 2.4.33 By contrast, very small
nucleophiles such as hydrides or acetylides experience less steric interaction with the remote 4-tert-
butyl group and favor the axial approach to avoid local interactions with the axial hydrogens at C-2
and C-6. Reduction of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone with lithium aluminum hydride proceeds pref-
erentially via axial attack and produces the equatorial alcohol as the major product.
Incorporation of small groups into the a-position of cyclohexanone does not change the
preference of lithium aluminum hydride for an axial attack. Computation of the two conformations
of (R)-2-methylcyclohexanone shows that the methyl group does not strongly interfere with an axial
approach. The predominant formation of (1R,2R)-trans-2-methylcyclohexan-1-ol can be attributed
to a relatively rapid hydride addition to the major conformer of (R)-2-methylcyclohexanone having
v
The same considerations apply to cyclopentanes, i.e., trans-1,2- and trans-1,3-disubstituted cyclopentanes are chiral,
irrespective of the structure of the substituents. Similarly, trans-1,2-cyclobutanes and trans-1,2-cyclopropanes are inherently
chiral, whereas both cis- and trans-1,3-cyclobutanes exhibiting identical substituents are achiral.
22 Chapter 2
trans-diaminocyclohexanes cis-diaminocyclohexanes
NH2 NH2 NH2
NH2 NH2
NH2 H2N NH2 NH2 H2N
NH2 H2N ea-conformation ae-conformation
NH2 NH2
ee-conformation aa-conformation aa-conformation ee-conformation
rapidly interconverting enantiomers
noninterconverting enantiomers
noninterconverting enantiomers
*ring flipping produces identical structures
trans-1-amino-2-methylcyclohexanes cis-1-amino-2-methylcyclohexanes
aa aa ae ae
Diastereoselective reduction
axial attack OH
(favored)
109o minor isomer
H H
O LiAlH4 axial carbinol
o H
109
H major isomer
H OH
H equatorial carbinol
equatorial attack
Scheme 2.4 Stereoselective Grignard reaction and reduction of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone with LiAlH4.
the methyl group in the equatorial position, Scheme 2.5. An increase in the steric bulk of the
a-substituent further locks the ketone into the equatorial conformation and results in enhanced
steric hindrance to an axial attack. In the case of 2-tert-butylcyclohexanone, these interactions
exceed the repulsion between the approaching hydride and the axial hydrogens at C-2 and C-6, and
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 23
axial attack
(favored) 109o
H OH H
Me Me Me
O LiAlH4
H + OH
109o cis-(1S,2R)-2-methyl- trans-(1R,2R)-2-methyl-
H
H cyclohexan-1-ol cyclohexan-1-ol
H 24% 76%
equatorial attack
axial attack
(favored)
equatorial attack
axial attack
equatorial attack
(favored)
axial attack
H OH H
t-Bu t-Bu t-Bu
O LiAlH4
H + OH
H cis-(1S,2R)-2-methyl- trans-(1R,2R)-2-methyl-
H cyclohexan-1-ol cyclohexan-1-ol
H 58% 42%
equatorial attack
(favored)
1,3-syndiaxial
repulsion
H
H H H O
H k1
H2O2 N H2O2
N N N
O k4 k3
k2
equatorial N-oxide axial N-methylpiperidine equatorial N-methylpiperidine axial N-oxide
5% (minor isomer) (major isomer) 95%
k1/k2 ~ 60 k3 < k4
isopropylcyclohexane 4-isopropylcyclohexene
H H
H
H H
H H i-Pr
H H
H i-Pr
H H H H
H i-Pr H H
equatorial conformer
1,3-syndiaxial i-Pr H
repulsion 1,3-synpseudoaxial equatorial conformer
axial conformer repulsion
axial conformer
X
X = Cl, Br, NHR, OH, OR
π σ*
Figure 2.21 Substituent effects on the relative stability of cyclohexane and cyclohexene conformations.
preference for the pseudoaxial position has been explained with resonance stabilization due to
overlap of the p-system of the double bond and an antibonding orbital of the allylic s-bond.
The relative stability of the half-chair conformation of disubstituted cyclohexenes or tetralin
(1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene) derivatives depends on a variety of intramolecular interactions in
addition to torsion and angle strain. Most important are resonance between the double bond and
the pseudoaxial allylic s-bond, synpseudoaxial repulsion, dipole–dipole interactions, and hydrogen
bonding. For example, incorporation of a methyl group into the saturated moiety of 4-(3 0 ,5 0 -
dinitrobenzamido)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene at carbons C-1, C-2 and C-3 alters the relative
stability of the conformer having the benzylic amido group in pseudoaxial position. Wolf and
Pirkle studied the conformational preference and rigidity of disubstituted 4-(3 0 ,5 0 -dinitrobenz-
amido)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene derivatives which are structural analogs of the so-called
Whelk-O selector.38 Initially developed to separate the enantiomers of naproxen and other profens,
this selector forms a chiral cleft which appears to be crucial for enantioselective recognition.vii It is
assumed that only one enantiomer of a given racemate can diffuse into the cleft to undergo
simultaneous hydrogen bonding to the amide function and face-to-face and face-to-edge inter-
actions with the aromatic moieties while maintaining a heavily populated low energy conformation,
Figure 2.22.39–44
The propensity of the DNB group to occupy the pseudoaxial position in 4-(3 0 ,5 0 -dinitrobenz-
amido)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrenes was evaluated based on chromatographic structure-activity
relationships. Chiral HPLC separation of the racemic Whelk-O analogs shown in Table 2.1 on an
vii
The Whelk-O selector has been used extensively for chromatographic enantioseparation of compounds exhibiting a
stereogenic center, axis or plane in close proximity to a hydrogen bond acceptor (usually a carbonyl group).
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 25
(3R,4R)-Whelk-O selector
O
O
pseudoaxial (S)-naproxen diamide
DNB group
Me2N
(S)-naproxen dimethylamide
3)
NO2
O
NO2
2) NH
1)
equatorial methyl
Figure 2.22 Chiral cleft and favored conformation of the Whelk-O selector participating in simultaneous
hydrogen bonding, face-to-face and face-to-edge interactions with (S)-naproxen dimethyl-
amide. Hydrogens bonded to carbon atoms are not shown. [Reproduced with permission from
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3597–3603.]
(S)-naproxen amide-derived chiral stationary phase allowed determination of the difference in the
Gibbs free energy, DDG1, of transient diastereomeric complexes according to Equation 2.1.
where a is the chromatographic separation factor, and DG1 is the Gibbs free energy of the formation
of transient diastereomeric complexes.
These energetic differences can be correlated to the influence of the methyl group on the relative
stability of the Whelk-O conformers. Stabilization of a cleft-like structure bearing a pseudoaxial
DNB group results in high enantioselectivity because (S)-naproxen fits perfectly into the chiral
pocket of one of the chromatographed Whelk-O enantiomers, as depicted in Figure 2.22. In
contrast, enantioselective recognition is diminished when the Whelk-O enantiomers are likely to
adopt a structure with a pseudoequatorial DNB group. In this case, the difference in the Gibbs free
energy, DDG1, of the transient diastereomeric complexes formed between the CSP and the
enantiomeric solutes is reduced as none of them can accommodate simultaneous hydrogen
bonding, face-to-face and face-to-edge interactions. Introduction of a methyl group into positions
C-1, C-2 and C-3 of the 4-amidotetrahydrophenanthrene ring yields three pairs of diastereoisomers
having either cis- or trans-configuration, Table 2.1. In order to understand the chiral recognition
mechanism, one has to remember that the tetrahydrophenanthrene ring of these Whelk-O analogs
resembles a cyclohexene or tetralin structure and that the benzylic electron-withdrawing benzamido
group generally prefers the pseudoaxial position.
The difference in the Gibbs free energy between the transient diastereomeric complexes formed
by the enantiomers of 4-(3 0 ,5 0 -dinitrobenzamido)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene and the (S)-
naproxen-derived chiral stationary phase was determined as 3.87 kJ/mol. The high selectivity has
been attributed to extensive population of the conformer that has the benzamido substituent in
26 Chapter 2
/ 3.87
DNBHN
cis-3,4- 4.05
DNBHN
trans-3,4- 3.77
DNBHN
cis-2,4- 1.52
DNBHN
trans-2,4- 3.02
DNBHN
cis-1,4- 3.56
DNBHN
trans-1,4- 1.92
DNBHN
pseudoaxial position, thus forming a chiral cleft exhibiting the 3,5-DNB group perpendicular to the
tetrahydrophenanthrene plane, which is a prerequisite for effective chiral recognition. Incorpora-
tion of a methyl group into the adjacent position provides cis- and trans-4-(3 0 ,5 0 -dinitrobenz-
amido)-3-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene. The cis-configuration preferentially populates
the conformation with a pseudoaxial DNB group and an equatorial methyl group over the
conformer having the DNB group in pseudoequatorial and the methyl substituent in axial position.
The cis-3,4-disubstituted Whelk-O analog therefore strongly favors the cleft-like conformation and
undergoes highly enantioselective interactions with (S)-naproxen exceeding 4.0 kJ/mol. By con-
trast, the cleft-like conformation is less heavily populated in the trans-3,4-disubstituted Whelk-O
derivative because it bears an axial methyl group. The stereoselectivity observed with the trans-
isomer is therefore reduced to 3.77 kJ/mol. The enantiomers of trans-4-(3 0 ,5 0 -dinitrobenzamido)-
2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene can afford a conformation having the two substituents in
Principles of Chirality and Dynamic Stereochemistry 27
the preferred pseudoaxial and equatorial orientations, whereas the cis-2,4-isomer must place the
methyl group in axial position in order to form the cleft with a pseudoaxial DNB group. The cleft-
like conformer is therefore more heavily populated by the trans-2,4-isomer than by the cis-
derivative. Accordingly, (S)-naproxen effectively differentiates between the enantiomers of the
trans-isomer (DDG1 ¼ 3.02 kJ/mol) but enantioselective separation and recognition of the cis-
diastereomer is diminished (1.52 kJ/mol). Finally, cis-4-(3 0 ,5 0 -dinitrobenzamido)-1-methyl-1,2,3,4-
tetrahydrophenanthrene shows superior enantioselectivity (DDG1 ¼ 3.56 kJ/mol) over the
trans-disubstituted analog (1.92 kJ/mol) because the cleft-like conformer is destabilized in the latter
due to synpseudoaxial interactions experienced by the methyl group. Clearly, the relative stability
and stereoselectivity of the cleft-like Whelk-O conformers originate from an energetic compromise
between the tendency of the DNB group to occupy a pseudoaxial position and the preference of the
methyl group for an equatorial or pseudoequatorial orientation.
REFERENCES
1. Cahn, R. S.; Ingold, C. K.; Prelog, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1966, 5, 385-415.
2. Prelog, V.; Helmchen, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 567-583.
3. Nierengarten, J.-F.; Dietrich-Buchecker, C. O.; Sauvage, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
375-376..
4. Chambron, J.-C.; Sauvage, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9558-9559.
5. Jäger, R.; Händel, M.; Harren, J.; Rissanen, K.; Vögtle, F. Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1201-1207.
6. Tauber J. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. Sect. A. 1963, 67, 591-599.
7. Reuter, C.; Mohry, A.; Sobanski, A.; Vögtle, F. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1674-1682.
8. Prelog, V.; Gerlach, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1964, 47, 2288-2294.
9. Gerlach, H.; Owtschinnikow, J. A.; Prelog, V. Helv. Chim. Acta 1964, 47, 2294-2302.
10. Mislow, K. Chimia 1986, 40, 395-402.
11. Chorev, M.; Goodman, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 266-272.
12. Eliel, E. L; Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1994,
pp. 1176-1181.
13. Wolf, C.; König, W. A.; Roussel, C. Chirality 1995, 7, 610-611.
14. Roussel, C.; Adjimi, M.; Chemlal, A.; Djafri, A. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5076-5080.
15. Newell, L. M.; Sekhar, V. C.; DeVries, K. M.; Staigers, T. L.; Finneman. J. I. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 961-963.
16. Roberts, R. M. G. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1985, 23, 52-54.
17. Dynes, J. J.; Baudais, F. L.; Boyd, R. K. Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 1292-1299.
18. Cram, D. J.; Elhafez, F. A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 5828-5835.
19. Cram, D. J.; Kopecky, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 2748-2755.
20. Chen, X.; Hortelano, E. R.; Eliel, E. L.; Frye, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
1778-1784.
21. Karabatsos, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1367-1371.
22. Cherest, M.; Felkin, H.; Prudent, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 2199-2204.
23. Cherest, M.; Felkin, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 2205-2208.
24. Anh, N. T.; Eisenstein, O. Nouv. J. Chimie 1977, 1, 61-70.
25. Heathcock, C. H.; Flippin, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1667-1668.
26. Lodge, E. P.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 3353-3361.
27. Bürgi, H. B.; Dunitz, J. D.; Schefter, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5065-5067.
28. Hammond, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 334-338.
29. Curtin, D. Y. Rec. Chem. Progr. 1954, 15, 111-128.
30. Clayden, J.; Lund, A.; Vallverdu, L.; Helliwell, M. Nature 2004, 431, 966-971.
28 Chapter 2
31. Eliel, E. L; Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1994,
pp. 686-725.
32. Yuasa, H.; Miyagawa, N.; Izumi, T.; Nakatani, M.; Izumi, M.; Hashimoto, H. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 1489-1492.
33. Reetz, M.; Stanchev, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 328-330.
34. Ashby, E. C.; Sevenair, J. P.; Dobbs, F. R. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 197-199.
35. Shvo, Y.; Kaufman, E. D. Tetrahedron, 1972, 28, 573-580.
36. Crowley, P. J.; Robinson, M. J. T.; Ward, M. G. Tetrahedron 1977, 33, 915-925.
37. Lessard, J.; Tan, P. V. M.; Martino, R.; Saunders, J. K. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 55, 1015-1023.
38. Wolf, C.; Pirkle, W. H. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3597-3603.
39. Pirkle, W. H.; Welch, C. J.; Lamm, B. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3854-3860.
40. Wolf, C.; Spence, P. L.; Pirkle, W. H.; Derrico, E. M.; Cavender, D. M.; Rozing, G. P.
J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 782, 175-179.
41. Wolf, C.; Pirkle, W. H. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 785, 173-178.
42. Wolf, C.; Pirkle, W. H. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 799, 177-184.
43. Wolf, C.; Spence, P. L.; Pirkle, W. H.; Cavender, D. M.; Derrico, E. M. Electrophoresis 2000,
21, 917-924.
44. Wolf, C.; Pranatharthiharan, L.; Volpe, E. C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3287-3290.
CHAPTER 3
The development of mechanistic insights into isomerization reactions, and information about the
conformational and configurational stability of chiral compounds under various conditions, are
indispensable for today’s chemist. Racemization, enantiomerization and diastereomerization of
chiral compounds play a key role across the chemical sciences and provide multiple opportunities
for asymmetric synthesis, the design of microscopic motors and machines, drug discovery and
medical diagnosis. A basic understanding of the properties and reactions of chiral compounds
requires in-depth analysis of the stereodynamics of coexisting isomers. Compounds that exist as a
mixture of rapidly interconverting stereoisomers are often conveniently, albeit inaccurately, viewed
as one averaged structure. A closer look reveals that organic compounds are generally fluxional and
adopt more than one conformation or configuration. For example, amines that have three different
substituents at the stereogenic nitrogen atom exist as a pair of configurationally unstable
enantiomers, and monosubstituted cyclohexanes populate two diastereomeric chair conformations
(and negligible twist conformations) having the substituent in either equatorial or axial position.
Because of the inherently low energy barrier to interconversion, it is often difficult to distinguish
between the individual isomers of stereolabile compounds. The energy barrier to pyramidal
inversion of ethylmethylisopropylamine is 31.4 kJ/mol, and the activation energy required for ring
flipping of the isomers of chlorocyclohexane is about 44 kJ/mol, Scheme 3.1. Both processes,
racemization of ethylmethylisopropylamine and diastereomerization of chlorocyclohexane, are fast
and only one averaged species is observed by NMR spectroscopy at room temperature. One can
distinguish between diastereotopic proton signals of the individual isomers of monosubstituted
cyclohexanes or chiral amines in the presence of a chiral shift reagent under cryogenic conditions
when the rates of interconversion are relatively slow with respect to the NMR time scale.
Alternatively, faster methods such as time-resolved microwave and IR spectroscopy generate an
instantaneous rather than a time-averaged spectrum and can be used to study the structures and
properties of stereolabile isomers even at room temperature.
.. Et
Me i-Pr
N N Cl
Me
i-Pr ≠
Et ≠
.. ∆G ≈ 44 kJ/mol
Cl
∆G = 31.4 kJ/mol
Racemization
(R) krac (R) (S)
(R) (S) krac (S)
(R) (R) (S)
(R) (S) (S)
(R) (R) (R) (S) (S) (S)
Enantiomerization
kenant
(R) (S ) krac = 2 kenant
kenant
Diastereomerization
k1
(R,R) (R,S) k1 ≠ k-1
k-1
i
Epimers are defined as diastereoisomers that differ in only one configuration of two or more elements of chirality.
Other documents randomly have
different content
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Physics
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Title: Physics
Language: English
(See p.441)
Three-color Printing
Y. Yellow impression; negative made
through a blue-violet filter. R. Crimson
impression; negative made through a
green filter. RY. Crimson on yellow. B.
Blue impression; negative made
through a red filter. YRB. Yellow,
crimson, and blue combined; the final
product. (Courtesy of Phototype
Engraving Co., Philadelphia.)
PHYSICS
BY
(1) Introduction 1
(2) States of Matter 4
(3) The Metric System 8
PHYSICS
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION AND MEASUREMENT
(1) Introduction
1. Physics, an Explanation of Common Things.—Many students
take up the study of physics expecting to see wonderful experiments
with the "X" rays, wireless telegraphy, dynamos, and other
interesting devices. Others are dreading to begin a study that to
them seems strange and difficult, because they fear it deals with
ideas and principles that are beyond their experience and hard to
comprehend.
Each of these classes is surprised to learn that physics is mainly an
explanation of common things. It is a study that systematizes our
knowledge of the forces and changes about us; such as the pull of
the earth, the formation of dew, rain and frost, water pressure and
pumps, echoes and music, thermometers and engines, and many
other things about us with which people are more or less familiar.
Physics is like other school subjects, such as mathematics and
language, in having its own peculiar vocabulary and methods of
study; these will be acquired as progress is made in the course.
The most useful habit that the student of physics can form is that of
connecting or relating each new idea or fact that is presented to him
to some observation or experience that will illustrate the new idea.
This relating or connecting of the new ideas to one's own personal
experience is not only one of the best known means of cultivating
the memory and power of association, but it is of especial help in a
subject such as physics, which deals with the systematic study and
explanation of the facts of our every-day experience.
2. Knowledge—Common and Scientific.—This leads to the
distinction between common knowledge and scientific knowledge.
We all possess common knowledge of the things about us, gained
from the impressions received by our senses, from reading, and from
the remarks of others. Scientific knowledge is attained when the bits
of common knowledge are connected and explained by other
information gained through study or experience. That is, common
knowledge becomes scientific, when it is organized. This leads to the
definition: Science is organized knowledge.
Common knowledge of the forces and objects about us becomes
scientific only as we are able to make accurate measurements of
these. That is, science is concerned not only in how things work, but
even more in how much is involved or results from a given activity.
For example, a scientific farmer must be able to compute his costs
and results in order to determine accurately his net profits. The
business man who is conducting his business with efficiency knows
accurately his costs of production and distribution.
This book is written in the hope that it will make more scientific the
student's common knowledge of the forces and changes in the world
about him and will give him many ideas and principles that will help
him to acquire the habit of looking from effects to their natural
causes and thus tend to develop what is called the scientific habit of
thought.
3. Hypothesis, Theory, and Law.—Three words that are
frequently used in science may be mentioned here: hypothesis,
theory, and law. An hypothesis is a supposition advanced to explain
some effect, change, or condition that has been observed. For
example, the Nebular Hypothesis of which many high-school
students have heard, is an attempt to explain the origin of the sun,
the earth, the planets, and other solar systems.
A theory is an hypothesis which has been tested in a variety of ways
and which seems to fit the conditions and results so that it is
generally accepted as giving a satisfactory explanation of the matter
in question. The Molecular Theory of Matter which states that matter
of all kinds is composed of very small particles called molecules (see
Art. 6), is a familiar example of a theory.
A theory becomes a law when it may be definitely proved. Many
laws are expressed in mathematical language, e.g., the law of
gravitation. (See Art. 88.) Many of the laws of physics are illustrated
by laboratory experiments, which show in a simple way just what
the law means.
Exercises
ebookbell.com