Protecting The Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction Robin Warner PDF Download
Protecting The Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction Robin Warner PDF Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/protecting-the-oceans-beyond-
          national-jurisdiction-robin-warner-2108954
Shark Quest Protecting The Oceans Top Predators Karen Romano Young
 https://ebookbell.com/product/shark-quest-protecting-the-oceans-top-
 predators-karen-romano-young-48949046
Captured At Sea Piracy And Protection In The Indian Ocean Jatin Dua
 https://ebookbell.com/product/captured-at-sea-piracy-and-protection-
 in-the-indian-ocean-jatin-dua-51819226
 https://ebookbell.com/product/preventive-methods-for-coastal-
 protection-towards-the-use-of-ocean-dynamics-for-pollution-
 control-1st-edition-tarmo-soomere-auth-4241868
 https://ebookbell.com/product/the-european-community-and-marine-
 environmental-protection-in-the-international-law-of-the-sea-
 publications-on-ocean-development-veronica-frank-2195602
Final Report From The Nrc Committee On The Review Of The Louisiana
Coastal Protection And Restoration Lacpr Program 1st Edition National
Research Council Division On Earth And Life Studies Ocean Studies
Board Water Science And Technology Board Committee On The Review Of
The  Louisiana Coastal Protection And Restoration Lacpr Program
https://ebookbell.com/product/final-report-from-the-nrc-committee-on-
the-review-of-the-louisiana-coastal-protection-and-restoration-lacpr-
program-1st-edition-national-research-council-division-on-earth-and-
life-studies-ocean-studies-board-water-science-and-technology-board-
committee-on-the-review-of-the-louisiana-coastal-protection-and-
restoration-lacpr-program-51400092
Prospecting Ocean Stefanie Hessler
https://ebookbell.com/product/prospecting-ocean-stefanie-
hessler-11324254
https://ebookbell.com/product/protecting-the-mind-challenges-in-law-
neuroprotection-and-neurorights-49th-edition-pablo-lpezsilva-46389240
https://ebookbell.com/product/protecting-the-ballot-how-firstwave-
democracies-ended-electoral-corruption-isabela-mares-49053562
https://ebookbell.com/product/protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-new-
minorities-in-international-law-iclars-series-on-law-and-religion-1st-
edition-fabienne-bretscher-49480436
   Protecting the Oceans
Beyond National Jurisdiction
        Strengthening the
  International Law Framework
                Legal Aspects
                      of
           Sustainable Development
General Editor
                             David Freestone
This series will publish work on all aspects of the international legal
dimensions of the concept of sustainable development. Its aim is to publish
important works of scholarship on a range of relevant issues including
conservation of natural resources, climate change, biodiversity loss and the role
of international agreements, international organizations and state practice.
VOLUME 3
    The titles published in this series are listed at the back of this volume
   Protecting the Oceans
Beyond National Jurisdiction
         Strengthening the
   International Law Framework
Robin Warner
         LEIDEN • BOSTON
              2009
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Warner, Robin F.
 Protecting the oceans beyond national jurisdiction : strengthening the international law
 framework / Robin Warner.
    p.    cm.
 Includes bibliographical references and index.
 ISBN 978-90-04-17262-3 (hardback : alk. paper)
 1. Marine resources conservation--Law and legislation. I. Title.
 K3485.W37 2009
 341.4’5--dc22
2008053617
Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishers, IDC Publishers,
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP.
http://www.brill.nl
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilm-
ing, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher.
Authorisation to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill Academic Pub-
lishers provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center,
222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change.
Chapter 4
Sectoral Implementation of Environmental Protection in Marine Areas
Beyond National Jurisdiction – Marine Living Resource Exploitation
and Maritime Transport                                                99
A. Introduction                                                       99
B. The Exploitation of Marine Living Resources Beyond National
    Jurisdiction – Regulatory Framework for Environmental Protection 100
    1. 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement                                 102
    2. FAO Code for Responsible Fisheries, 1995                      108
    3. FAO High Seas Compliance Agreement, 1993                      111
    4. Regional Fisheries Management Organizations                   112
    5. Overall Assessment of RFMO Performance in relation to
        Protection of the Marine Environment Beyond National
        Jurisdiction                                                 124
C. Maritime Transport Beyond National Jurisdiction – Environmental
    Regulation                                                       127
    1. Vessel Source Pollution                                       128
    2. Invasive Aquatic Species in Marine Areas Beyond National
        Jurisdiction                                                 145
    3. Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas                              148
    4. The Effectiveness of the Maritime Transport Framework for
        Environmental Protection in Marine Areas Beyond National
        Jurisdiction                                                 154
Chapter 5
Sectoral Implementation of Environmental Protection in Marine Areas
Beyond National Jurisdiction – Deep Seabed Mining                  157
A. Introduction                                                    157
B. ISA Regulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Polymetallic
    Nodules in the Area                                            158
    1. Polymetallic Nodule Environmental Guidelines and State
       Practice in Complying with Polymetallic Nodules Regulations 162
C. Draft ISA Regulations for Prospecting and Exploration for
    Polymetallic Sulphides and Ferromanganese Cobalt Rich Crusts
    (PSFCRC Regulations)                                           166
D. Conclusion                                                      170
x               Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
Chapter 6
Regional Implementation of Environmental Protection in Marine Areas
Beyond National Jurisdiction                                          173
A. Introduction                                                       173
B. UNEP Regional Seas Conventions and their Application to Marine
   Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction                                 175
   1. Convention for the Protection of the Natural Resources and
       Environment of the South Pacific Region (Noumea Convention) 177
   2. Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and
       the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (Barcelona Convention) 181
   3. Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine
       Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region (Cartagena
       Convention)                                                    187
   4. Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and
       Coastal Areas of the South East Pacific (Lima Convention)      190
C. Non UNEP Regional Marine Environmental Protection Regimes
   and their Application to Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction 193
   1. Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of
       the Northeast Atlantic (OSPAR Convention)                      193
   2. Integrated Protection of the Antarctic Marine Environment       199
D. Conclusion                                                         204
Chapter 7
International Initiatives to Strengthen the Environmental Protection
Framework for Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction              207
A. Introduction                                                      207
B. Current International Discussions on the Protection of the Marine
    Environment Beyond National Jurisdiction                         208
    1. United Nations Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and
       the Law
       of the Sea (UNICPOLOS)                                        209
    2. BBNJ Working Group                                            211
    3. Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties
       (CBD COP)                                                     214
    4. FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI)                             215
    5. IUCN High Seas Governance for the 21st Century Workshop       215
C. Options for Strengthening the Environmental Protection
    Framework for Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction          220
    1. Soft Law Declaration of Oceans Governance Principles for
       Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction                     221
                            Table of Contents                   xi
Bibliography                                                   235
Index                                                          257
                      Series Editor’s Preface
This is the third volume in the Martinus Nijhoff monograph series on Legal As-
pects of Sustainable Development published under my general editorship. The
aim of this series is to publish works at the cutting edge of legal scholarship that
address both the practical and the theoretical aspects of this important concept.
    The governance of areas beyond national jurisdiction is probably the most
pressing marine issue facing the world community. It is paradoxical that on the
one hand science is helping us to appreciate more fully the rich biodiversity of
marine areas beyond national zones and the important role this plays in the global
system, including helping to regulate its climate, while on the other hand, these
high seas areas face increasing adverse impacts – both from the intensification
of existing human activities and from major new risks. Illegal, unregulated and
unreported (IUU) fishing for deep ocean species, uncontrolled bottom trawling
over seamounts, exploration of hydrothermal vents as well as proposals for geo-
engineering activities such as iron fertilization, are just some of the activities
which reveal the lack of an holistic system of governance for these areas, based
on established and agreed basic principles. In 2006 on the recommendation of the
UN Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea
(UNICPOLOS), the UN General Assembly established an Ad Hoc Open-ended
Informal Working Group to study issues relating to the conservation and sustain-
able use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction. Two
meetings of this Group have helped to focus informed opinion on the major issues
facing the high seas; however the debates on improved governance have been
overshadowed by controversy over the future regime for exploitation of marine
genetic resources beyond national jurisdiction.
    Dr Robin Warner’s monograph is therefore both pertinent and opportune. She
sets out in detail the existing legal and regulatory regimes for the protection of
marine areas beyond national jurisdiction: from the overarching framework of the
1982 Law of the Sea Convention, through to the 1992 Convention on Biological
Diversity, the regimes for regulation of fisheries and maritime transport and the
regional seas regimes. She then contrasts the gold standard set by the International
Seabed Authority for environmental protection during sea bed mineral exploita-
tion activities with the existing ad hoc and patchwork regulation of high seas
living resources, and uses this analysis to present the key issues and the range of
options for improved governance of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction that
are open to the international community. I trust that her timely work will further
stimulate informed discussion and forward progress on this important agenda.
                                                                 David Freestone
                                                                  Washington DC
                                  Preface
It is only in recent decades that marine scientific research has begun to reveal
the rich biodiversity and abundant resources of the open ocean and deep seabed
beyond national jurisdiction. These vast marine areas, covering approximately
50% of the globe, contain some of the most unique species and habitats as
well as being the transitory home for a wide array of migratory species such
as fish, birds, turtles and cetaceans.
    With advances in technology and maritime transport, the spectrum and
intensity of human activities in these remote parts of the ocean and the deep
seabed are steadily increasing. A combination of factors such as the depletion
of fisheries within national jurisdiction, the expansion in global maritime trade
and scientific interest in the deep sea have led to greater human usage of the
vast marine areas beyond the territorial seas and exclusive economic zones
of coastal States. Human uses of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction
now extend beyond the traditional activities of navigation and fishing to bio-
prospecting for marine genetic resources, exploration for deep sea minerals,
marine scientific research probes of the deep sea and seismic testing. Emerg-
ing uses of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction include geo-engineering
experiments to mitigate the effects of climate change such as sub-seabed
sequestration of carbon dioxide and open ocean fertilisation using iron and
other nutrients.
    This rise in human activities outside the limits of coastal State jurisdiction
poses actual and potential threats to the marine environment. Over fishing of
straddling, highly migratory and discrete high seas fish stocks can weaken
the genetic diversity and resilience of the target species and adversely affect
associated and dependent species within the same ecosystem. Destructive
fisheries practices such as bottom trawling and pelagic long line fishing have
catastrophic consequences for non target species and habitats destroyed and
damaged in the wake of heavy rollers and multiple hooks deployed across the
ocean. Vessel source pollution, although highly regulated through the mecha-
nism of flag State jurisdiction, is not subject to any independent monitoring
and compliance system in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction. Oil and
other substances accidentally or intentionally discharged from vessels and
marine debris such as plastics continue to cause significant harm to marine
life.
    Until the latter decades of the twentieth century, the deep sea with its unique
habitats and rare creatures was largely unexplored by humans. Arbitrary hu-
man intrusions into the deep sea have the potential to damage the intricate
xvi               Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
1985 Convention for the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine
and Coastal Environment of the Eastern African Region, Nairobi, 21 June 1985 (en-
tered into force 29 May 1996) Official Journal of the European Community 1986,
C253/10
1985 Protocol concerning Protected Areas and Wild Flora and Fauna in the Eastern
African Region, Nairobi, 21 June 1985 (entered into force 29 May 1996) Official
Journal of the European Community 1986, C253/10
1986 Convention for the Protection of the Natural Resources and Environment of
the South Pacific Region, Noumea, 24 November 1986 (entered into force 22 August
1990) (1987) 26 ILM 41
1989 Protocol for the Conservation and Management of Protected Marine and Coast-
al Areas of the South-East Pacific, Paipa, 21 September 1989 (entered into force 17
October 1994) text at Internet Guide to International Fisheries Law, <www.intfishnet/
treaties/sepac1989.htm>
1990 Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife in the Wider Carib-
bean, Kingston, 18 January 1990 (entered into force 18 June 2000) text at <www.cep.
unep.org/pubs/legislation/spaw.htm>
1991 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, Madrid, 4 Octo-
ber 1991 (entered into force 14 January 1998) (1991) 30 ILM 1455
1992 Agenda 21, Annex II to the Report of the United Nations Conference on Environ-
ment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3 to 14 June 1992, UN Doc A/CONF.151/26
1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, Nairobi, 22 May 1992 (entered into force
29 December 1993) (1992) 31 ILM 822
1992 Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East
Atlantic, Paris, 22 September 1992 (entered into force 25 March 1998) (1993) 32
ILM 1069
1992 Rio de Janeiro Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3
to 14 June 1992, UN Doc A/CONF.151/5/REV.1; (1992) 31 ILM 876
1993 Agreement for the Establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, Rome,
25 November 1993 (entered into force 27 March 1996) ATS [1996] No. 20
1993 Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Man-
agement Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas, Rome, 24 November 1993
(entered into force 24 April 2003) (1994) 33 ILM 968
1993 Asia Pacific Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Asia-
Pacific Region, Tokyo, 1 December 1993 (in effect 1 April 1994) text at <www.jp/
tokyomou>
Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Conven-
tion on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, New York, 28 July 1994 (entered
into force 28 July 1996) (1994) 33 ILM 1309
xxiv              Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Conven-
tion on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and
Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, New York,
4 August 1995 (entered into force 11 December 2001) 2167 UNTS 3
1995 Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, Rome, 31 October 1995, text at 11
International Organizations and the Law of the Sea Documentary Yearbook (1995)
700
1995 Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Re-
gion of the Mediterranean, Barcelona, 10 June 1995 (entered into force 9 July 2004)
text at <www.unep.ch/regional seas/regions/med/t_barcel.htm>
1995 Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the
Mediterranean, Barcelona, 10 June 1995 (entered into force 12 December 1999) UN
Doc UNEP(OCA)MED IG.6/7, text at >www.unepmap.org/Archivio/All_ Languages/
WebDocs/BC & Protocols/SPA95_eng.pdf>
1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping
of Wastes and Other Matter, London, 7 November 1996 (entered into force 24 March
2006) (1997) 36 ILM 1
2000 Convention on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish
Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, Honolulu, 5 September 2000 (en-
tered into force 19 June 2004) (2001) 40 ILM 277
2001 Convention on the Conservation and Management of the Fishery Resources in
the South East Atlantic Ocean, Windhoek, 20 April 2001 (entered into force 13 April
2003) (2002) 41 ILM 257
2004 International Convention on the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Wa-
ter Sediments, London, 13 February 2004 (not in force), IMO Doc BWMCONF/36,
text at <www.imo.org/home.asp?topic_id161>
                                      Chapter 1
A. Introduction
From a human perspective, the open ocean and deep seabed have always been
a source of great mystique and volatility.1 Although some intrepid humans
navigated the surface of the open ocean in primitive vessels in earlier centuries
in search of other land territory or food sources, the majority of humankind
tended to regard the sea with awe and to retreat from its elemental fury until
recent times.2 Human exploration of the deep sea did not begin in earnest until
the mid nineteenth century3 and it is only in the last few decades that marine
scientific research has begun to reveal the true physical characteristics and
resource potential of the open ocean and deep seabed.4
    Until the latter half of the twentieth century, human use of the oceans be-
yond a narrow strip of the sea adjacent to land masses was largely confined to
navigation, fishing, whaling5 and from the mid nineteenth century, the laying
of submarine cables and pipelines.6 With the advent of concepts such as the
continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone codified in the 1958 Geneva
Convention on the Continental Shelf and the 1982 United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea (LOSC), coastal States had the capacity to extend their
jurisdictional reach to a wider offshore domain for specific purposes such as
1
     Jonathan Raban (ed.), The Oxford Book of the Sea (Oxford University Press, Oxford,
     1992), p. 1.
2
     Ibid., pp. 432–433.
3
     Sylvia Earle, A Message of the Oceans (G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1995), p. 21.
4
     Alastair Couper (ed.), The Times Atlas and Encyclopaedia of the Sea (Times Books Ltd.,
     London, 1990), pp. 202–203.
5
     Earle, supra note 3.
6
     Couper, supra note 4, p. 200 notes that the first successful submarine cable was laid
     between England and France in 1851.
2                 Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
The vast ocean expanse beyond waters under the national jurisdiction of coastal
States is classified by marine scientists and oceanographers as the open ocean
and the deep seabed. From the surface of the sea, the features of this environ-
ment appear quite uniform with only rare traces of the diverse species, habitats
and ecosystems which are located in this large domain. Notwithstanding its
relatively featureless exterior, the monotony of the ocean and its endless wave
patterns conceal some of the world’s most exceptional species and extraor-
7
    1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1833 UNTS 3 (LOSC), Arts 56
    and 77.
8
    Kristina Gjerde and Charlotte Breide (eds), Towards a Strategy for High Seas Marine
    Protected Areas: Proceedings of the IUCN, WCPA and WWF Experts Workshop on High
    Seas Marine Protected Areas, 15–17 January, Malaga, Spain (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland,
    2003), pp. 6–7.
9
    Ibid., p. 7.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment                 3
10
     Paul V. Snelgrove and J. Frederick Grassle, ‘The Deep Sea: Desert and Rainforest’ (1995)
     38(2) Oceanus p. 25.
11
     Jeffrey S. Levinton, Marine Biology. Function, Biodiversity, Ecology (Oxford University
     Press, Oxford, 2001), p. 14; Couper, supra note 4, pp. 68–69.
12
     Couper, supra note 4, p. 68.
13
     Levinton, supra note 11, p. 14.
14
     Couper, supra note 4, p. 68.
15
     Ibid.
16
     Levinton, supra note 11, p. 14: “Neuston are organisms associated with the sea surface
     including microorganisms that are bound to the surface slick of the sea.”
17
     Andrew Byatt et al., The Blue Planet: A Natural History of the Oceans (BBC Worldwide
     Ltd., London, 2001), p. 278
4                   Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
the maximum depth to which light penetrates from the surface.18 Many of the
living creatures in this zone migrate upwards to the surface during the night
hours to feed and exhibit physical characteristics which help them to blend
into the marine environment and avoid predators during daylight hours.19
    The number of species decreases in the bathypelagic or upper part of the
dark zone which is directly under the mesopelagic zone and extends to a depth
of approximately 4000 to 5000 metres from the surface.20 The water becomes
much colder and denser in this zone with temperatures decreasing to 5 degrees
centigrade or less.21 Migration of species is rare at this depth where survival
depends on conservation of energy.22 Black and dark red fish such as angler
fish, red shrimps and gelatinous squid are typical inhabitants of this zone.23
    The next biological layer of the water column from about 4000 to 6000
metres from the surface down to the seafloor is known as the abyssopelagic
zone.24 The species and habitats of this zone tend to be closely associated with
the sea floor environment and its biological communities which are known as
the benthos.25 The variability and peculiar characteristics of benthic flora and
fauna have only been revealed in recent decades with more frequent deep sea
research probes.26 In an area of the oceans which was previously thought to be
moribund and devoid of living resources, marine scientific research is gradu-
ally exposing an abundant array of species and habitats. While the majority
of benthic organisms are microscopic and live buried in the sediment of the
deep seafloor, there are some striking oases of productive life even at this
depth.27 Specific habitats, such as seamounts and hydrothermal vents support
endemic communities of slow growing fish with special adaptations to their
environment and chemosynthetic organisms which derive their energy from
superheated gases such as hydrogen sulphide which extrude from fissures in
18
     Ibid., p. 314; Couper, supra note 4, p. 68; Levinton, supra note 11, p. 14.
19
     Couper, supra note 4, p. 68.
20
     Levinton, supra note 11, p. 14, Byatt et al., supra note 17, pp. 322–323.
21
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 330.
22
     Ibid., pp. 331 and 333; Couper, supra note 4, p. 68.
23
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 331.
24
     Levinton, supra note 11, p. 14.
25
     John D. Gage and Paul A. Tyler, Deep Sea Biology: A Natural History of Organisms at
     the Deep Sea Floor (1991), p. 57: “The fauna of the benthic boundary is comprised of
     those animals living either on the ocean floor, the benthos, or those associated with the
     immediately overlying water, the benthopelagic fauna which comprises swimming or
     drifting forms, some of which may spend varying amounts of time on, or even buried in,
     the seabed.”
26
     Snelgrove and Grassle, supra note 10, p. 25.
27
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 362.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment     5
the earth’s crust.28 A further marine biological layer, known as the hadapelagic
zone, extending from approximately 6000 to 10000 metres from the surface, is
found in the waters of deep sea trenches, the deepest part of the ocean.29 This
zone is characterised by extreme pressure and the coldest water temperatures.
Nevertheless, some invertebrates such as starfish and tube worms thrive at
this depth.
Oceanographers also divide the ocean into marine biogeographic areas relat-
ing to sea surface temperatures and corresponding roughly to areas between
certain latitudes.30 In all these biogeographic regions there are large areas of
ocean beyond national jurisdiction. The coldest waters are situated in the Arc-
tic, sub Arctic and Southern Oceans where surface temperatures are between 5
degrees and a little below 0 degrees centigrade.31 The marine living resources
within these regions include migratory predators such as seabirds and whales
supported in relatively short food chains by a wide variety of fish, crustaceans,
bivalves, krill and plankton which inhabit the pelagic and benthic realms.32
The isolated species and habitats of the Southern Ocean below the Antarctic
Convergence are generally considered to be more diverse and productive than
those of the Arctic.33
    In the cool surface waters of the boreal regions adjacent to the Arctic and
Southern Oceans, surface temperatures range from 5 to 10 degrees centigrade.34
These waters merge into the temperate regions which have surface tempera-
tures between 10 and 20 degrees centigrade. The boreal and temperate regions
are the most consistently productive biogeographic regions of the oceans with
a high density of microscopic organisms present in the water column with the
highest levels occurring in spring and early summer.35 The warmest surface
temperatures of 20 degrees centigrade and above occur in the tropical oceans
around the Equator.36 These areas are characterised by high species diversity
28
     Ibid., pp. 362–363.
29
     Levinton, supra note 11, p. 14; Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 11.
30
     Couper, supra note 4, p. 68; Byatt et al., supra note 17, pp. 12–13.
31
     Ibid.
32
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, pp. 224–227; Couper, supra note 4, p. 68.
33
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 227; Couper, supra note 4, p. 78.
34
     Couper, supra note 4, p. 68.
35
     Ibid.; Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 157.
36
     Ibid.
6                    Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
but shorter life cycles for the higher quotas of living organisms.37 Surface
temperatures in the world’s oceans are also affected by cold and warm water
currents that circle the globe distributing nutrients and affording opportuni-
ties for highly migratory species such as tuna to forage for food in multiple
oceanic regions.38
3. Seafloor Topography
The deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction begins at the outer edge of the
continental margin which is composed of three topographical features known
as the continental shelf, slope and rise.39 The majority of the earth’s land-
masses are surrounded by relatively shallow flat bottomed seas. The seabed
in these areas is known as the continental shelf.40 This natural prolongation of
the landmasses varies in width but most commonly ends at a depth of around
200 metres at a point known as the shelf break.41 From this point the down-
ward gradient of the seabed increases into what is known as the continental
slope.42 The slope varies in character with some parts having a very gradual
and uniform gradient while others have a very uneven gradient with distinc-
tive irregularities such as submarine canyons and terraces.43 At the foot of the
continental slope there is a thick wedge of sediment which has fallen from the
slope, termed the continental rise.44
    Beyond this point, at a depth of approximately 4 kilometres from the sur-
face, the seabed levels off to the flat abyssal plain which is the largest portion
of the marine environment.45 While the majority of this sediment covered
plain is flat and featureless, it is punctuated by unique habitats which harbour
concentrated communities of rare benthic fauna.46
37
     Ibid.
38
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, pp. 268–269; Couper, supra note 4, p. 51.
39
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 346; Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 11.
40
     Ibid.; Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 9.
41
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 9.
42
     Ibid.; Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 346.
43
     Ibid.
44
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 10.
45
     Ibid.; Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 346.
46
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, pp. 348–353.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment                  7
There are certain distinctive deep sea habitats whose rare and fragile ecosys-
tems demonstrate the need for careful conservation and management of the
marine environment beyond national jurisdiction.
1. Seamounts
Seamounts are undersea conical projections which rise steeply from the deep
sea floor to heights of 1000 metres or more.47 These undersea mountains often
occur in clusters or ranges along mid ocean ridges where lava rises from within
the Earth, continuously forming new oceanic crust.48 Seamounts are usually
volcanic in origin but may also form as a result of the vertical movement of
tectonic plates beneath the earth’s surface.49 They occur in all oceans but are
most common in the Pacific.50 Recent deep sea exploration has revealed their
value as rich repositories of mineral deposits and havens for dense colonies of
fish and other species.51
    Seamounts are often the site of hydrothermal precipitates such as polyme-
tallic sulphides and cobalt rich crusts which form as a result of superheated
gases extruding from fissure sin the earth’s crust.52 While there is currently no
commercial exploitation of these deep seabed minerals occurring beyond na-
tional jurisdiction, seamounts are likely to be an attractive investment location
for this industry in the future.53 Seamounts also attract large aggregations of
fish which feed on plankton and other marine organisms ensnared as they rise
to the surface.54 The fish species which inhabit seamounts often have very low
fecundity and are extremely long lived rendering them especially vulnerable
47
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 10; Keith Probert, ‘Seamounts, Sanctuaries and
     Sustainability: Moving Towards Deep Sea Conservation’ (1999) 9 Aquatic Conservation:
     Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, p. 601.
48
     Ibid.
49
     Maria C. Baker et al., The Status of Natural Resources on the High Seas (WWF/IUCN/
     WCPA, Gland, Switzerland, 2001), p. 22.
50
     Ibid.
51
     Baker et al., supra note, 49, pp. 23–24.
52
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 24.
53
     Probert, supra note 47, p. 602.
54
     Probert, supra note 47, p. 601; J. Anthony Koslow, ‘Fish Stocks and Benthos of Seamounts’
     in Hjalmar Thiel and J. Anthony Koslow (eds), Managing Risks to Biodiversity and the
     Environment on the High Seas, Including Tools such as Marine Protected Areas – Scientific
     Requirements and Legal Aspects (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, 2001),
     pp. 45–46.
8                   Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
2. Hydrothermal Vents
One of the most intriguing and biologically diverse habitats of the deep sea en-
vironment is the hydrothermal vent. The phenomenal biological communities
which thrive in the vicinity of hydrothermal vents were first discovered dur-
ing an expedition by a group of National Geographic researchers in February
1977 in the vessel, Knorr to the Galapagos Rift in the Eastern Pacific.64 Dense
clam colonies, normally only found in much shallower coastal waters, alerted
55
     Probert, supra note 47, p. 601; Koslow, supra note 54, p. 48.
56
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 24.
57
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 292.
58
     Probert, supra note 47, p. 602.
59
     Koslow, supra note 54, p. 49; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 25.
60
     Probert, supra note 47, p. 602; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 23.
61
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 24.
62
     Koslow, supra note 54, p. 49; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 24.
63
     Baker et al., supra note 49, pp. 24–25; Koslow, supra note 54, p. 50.
64
     Robert D. Ballard, Adventures in Ocean Exploration. From the Discovery of the Titanic
     to the Search for Noah’s Flood (National Geographic, Washington DC, 2001), p. 55;
     Robert D. Ballard (with Will Hively), The Eternal Darkness (Princeton University Press,
     Princeton, 2000), pp. 169–173.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment         9
deep sea scientists to investigate these habitats more closely to discover more
about the energy and food sources supporting these unusual bivalve mollusc
communities.65 They discovered that hydrothermal activity occurs along mid
ocean ridges, where fissures in the earth’s crust allow sea water to penetrate
to depths of a few kilometres and mix with hot basalt to produce hot water
springs venting through the deep sea floor.66 The super heated liquid emerging
from these vents can be as hot as 350 to 400 degrees centigrade and is full of
minerals from the surrounding rock which form chimney like deposits around
the vents, known as black or white smokers.67 Closer research into these sites,
following the initial discovery at the Galapagos Rift, revealed that a chemosyn-
thetic reaction taking place in the water of the vents was the energy source for
the unique forms of life which occurred in their vicinity.68 Large numbers of
bacteria were formed in the hydrothermal fluid through a process synthesising
organic carbon from carbon dioxide and methane.69 These chemoautotrophic
bacteria are the food and energy source for the strange communities of bi-
valves and tubeworms which scientists have discovered at the vents.70
    Although the precise number of hydrothermal vents occurring beyond na-
tional jurisdiction is not yet known, scientists have estimated that there would
be approximately 500 on mid ocean ridges averaging one per 100 kilometres
ridge length.71 Around the 30 vent sites which have been actively researched,
approximately 450 invertebrate species have been identified and 32 fish and
octopus species have also been observed near the vents.72 The majority of
vent species have only been found at a single site, highlighting the unique
and endemic nature of these fauna.73 Specialised vent species appear to be
confined to depths greater than 400 metres.74
    Hydrothermal vents have multiple commercial exploitation possibilities
and scientific value. Species which survive at such extreme temperatures and
in highly toxic environments have potential value for a wide range of medical,
industrial and agricultural applications.75 The organisms derived from hydro-
thermal vents, known as hyperthermophiles and extremophiles are already
65
     Ballard, supra note 64, pp. 237–240.
66
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 363; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 15.
67
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 366; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 15.
68
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 367; Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 363.
69
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 363; Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 367.
70
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 367.
71
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 15.
72
     Ibid., p. 16.
73
     Ibid.
74
     Ibid., p. 17.
75
     Ibid.
10                  Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
76
     Ibid.
77
     Probert, supra note 47, p. 602; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 17.
78
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 17.
79
     Ibid., p. 18.
80
     S. Kim Juniper, ‘Background Paper on Deep-sea Hydrothermal Vents’ in Hjalmar Thiel
     and J. Anthony Koslow (eds), Managing Risks to Biodiversity and The Environment on
     the High Seas, Including Tools such as Marine Protected Areas – Scientific Requirements
     and Legal Aspects (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, 2001), p. 91.
81
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 385.
82
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 45.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment                 11
including the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction but their full global
distribution is not yet known.83
    Chemosynthetic processes at the seeps produce benthic fauna which re-
semble those found at hydrothermal vents.84 Large bivalves such as clams and
mussels are common as well as colonies of tubeworms.85 The majority of these
species are endemic to their particular seeps.86 The more moderate conditions
of the cold seeps support a greater range of species than hydrothermal vents
but some species are slower to grow in the seep environment.87 The high bio-
diversity content of the cold seeps will act as a magnet for ongoing scientific
research into these communities. In common with hydrothermal vents, chem-
osynthetic bacteria from cold seeps may contain valuable genetic resources
which are attractive to the bioprospecting industry. Commercial exploitation
of minerals from seep fluids may also become viable in the future.88 At this
stage comprehensive identification of cold seeps beyond national jurisdiction
has not progressed far and will require a concerted biogeographic mapping
effort as they are less prominent features than hydrothermal vents.
Deep sea trenches are formed by the downward collapse of oceanic crust
into the hot centre of the earth when an oceanic tectonic plate collides with
a continental plate.89 Deep trenches in the ocean floor ranging in depth from
6,000 to 10,000 metres are formed through this process which is known as
subduction.90 Subduction occurs most commonly along island arc systems
and active continental margins.91 Many of the 37 deep ocean trenches known
to scientists occur within the 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zones of
coastal States, however, there are examples of deep ocean trenches beyond
national jurisdiction in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans.92 Deep ocean
trenches are typically elongated and narrow, ranging in length from 100 to
83
     Ibid., p. 46.
84
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 385; Juniper, supra note 80, p. 91.
85
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, pp. 385–386; Baker et al., supra note 49, pp. 46–47.
86
     Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 47.
87
     Ibid.
88
     Ibid.
89
     Byatt et al., supra note 17, p. 29.
90
     Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 11.
91
     Ibid.
92
     Baker et al., supra note 49, pp. 28–29.
12                   Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
3000 kilometres and a few tens of kilometres wide.93 The base of the trench
is covered in fine sediment and may also contain terrestrial plant debris and
rocks.94
    As with vent biological communities, trench fauna are highly adapted to
their fundamentally unstable environment where they are constantly subject
to physical disturbance, immense water pressure and fluctuating nutrients.95
Faunal biodiversity decreases with depth with the greatest range of species
inhabiting the shallower parts of the trench.96 Holothurians, also known as sea
cucumbers, which live on soft sediment and feed on detritus, predominate in
the lower zones of trenches.97 Bivalve molluscs and polychaete worms also
occur in the nether regions of the trench.98 Some of these species appear to
be supported by chemosynthetic processes similar to those at the hydrother-
mal vents.99 In the upper zones more complex organisms appear including
sipunculans crustaceans and sea stars.100 As with seamounts and hydrothermal
vents, trench fauna are usually endemic to their particular trench.101
    Although difficult to access, deep sea trench species, known as hadal
fauna, have potential commercial applications. Their adaptations to the trench
environment provide further knowledge on sustaining life processes under
extreme hydrostatic pressure which has synergies with sustaining human life
under anaesthetics.102 The unique gene pool of trench fauna also has medical,
industrial and other biotechnological applications.103 The primary threats to
deep sea trench environments are proposals to dump waste in the trenches
including oil, chemicals, sewage, high level nuclear material and mining
tailings.104 More stringent environmental protection measures beyond those
already applicable to vessel source pollution, including environmental impact
assessment of human activities which affect the species, habitats and ecosys-
tems of deep sea trenches may be necessary to avert such threats.
93
      Ibid., p. 28.
94
      Ibid.
95
      Ibid., p. 29.
96
      Ibid.
97
      Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 67; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 29.
98
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 29.
99
      Ibid., p. 30.
100
      Ibid., p. 29.
101
      Probert, supra note 47, p. 602.
102
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 30.
103
      Ibid.
104
      Ibid., p. 31.
             Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment               13
Although the deep sea does not have the extensive coral reefs typical of shal-
lower tropical waters, scientists have discovered some coral species which
form large reef structures in deep sea areas.105 Stony reef building corals have
been found in many areas of the deep sea forming large growths up to 30 metres
high in one case and extending for several thousand metres in others.106 The
most prevalent and studied species is lophelia pertusa which often occurs at
higher points on the deep seabed such as seamounts, ridges, carbonate mounds
and sand mounds where current flow is faster and the food supply of passing
plankton is greater.107 Other species of coral, such as madrepora oculata and
desmphyllum, with similar physical characteristics are also common in these
locations.108 Contrary to earlier perceptions of deep sea marine organisms, the
deep water corals are brightly coloured and, like their tropical counterparts,
display a branch like structure of hard calcium carbonate which harbours the
individual polyps.109 The densest known concentrations of lophelia pertusa
have been found on the continental shelf of the North East Atlantic Ocean area
but discoveries have also been made of lophelia pertusa and other species of
coral in deep sea areas beyond the continental margin.110
   A huge array of other species thrive in deep sea coral habitats.111 Up to 800
species have been located in lophelia pertusa communities in the North East
Atlantic Ocean. While the number of fish and mollusc species is relatively low
compared to shallow water coral reefs, the deep water coral reefs host hun-
dreds of invertebrate species such as sponges, bryozoans and hydroids many
of them new to marine science.112 The reefs also attract large aggregations
105
      Lauren S. Mullineaux and Susan W. Mills, ‘Coral Gardens in the Dark Depths: Scientists
      Seek to Learn More about the Abundant, Fragile and Now Threatened Communities’ (2005)
      43(2) Oceanus, p. 6; Murray Roberts, ‘Managing Impacts on the Marine Environment’
      in Anthony J. Grehan et al., The Irish Coral Task Force and Atlantic Coral Ecosystem
      Study Report on Two Deep-water Coral Conservation Stakeholder Workshops Held in
      Galway in 2000 and 2002 (Marine Science Institute, National University of Ireland,
      Galway, 2003), p. 59; Anthony J. Grehan, ‘Deep Water Coral Conservation’ in Hjalmar
      Thiel and J. Anthony Koslow, Managing Risks to Biodiversity and The Environment on
      the High Seas, Including Tools such as Marine Protected Areas – Scientific Requirements
      and Legal Aspects (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, 2001), p. 67; Byatt et
      al., supra note 17, pp. 355–356.
106
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 33.
107
      Ibid.
108
      Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 102.
109
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 33; Mullineaux and Mills, supra note 105, p. 6.
110
      Baker et al., supra note 49, pp. 33–34.
111
      Grehan, supra note 105, p. 67.
112
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 35.
14                   Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
of commercially exploited fish such as redfish and ling.113 Some fish species
use the deep water reef habitats as nursery and spawning grounds.114 Smaller
fish species and invertebrate suspension feeders use the reefs as refuges.115
The fragile reef structure is extremely susceptible to damage from destructive
fisheries practices such as bottom trawling and scientific studies indicate that
re-growth rates for lophelia pertusa are very slow.116 Substantial destruction of
the reef structure and excessive exploitation of endemic fish species will also
affect the balance of the dependent ecosystems.117 Deep water coral habitats
are vulnerable to the heavy impact of oil and minerals exploration and produc-
tion activities and the more primitive methods of marine scientific research
such as trawling and dredging for samples.118
113
      Grehan, supra note 105, p. 67.
114
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 35.
115
      Gage and Tyler, supra note 25, p. 102.
116
      Mullineaux and Mills, supra note 105, p. 6; Baker et al., supra note 49, pp. 35–36.
117
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 36; Mullineaux and Mills, supra note 105, p. 6.
118
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 36.
             Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment                15
and fragile ecosystems of the open ocean and deep seabed if not carefully
managed now and in the future. Currently there is very limited provision in the
international legal framework for any prior or ongoing environmental impact
assessment of new human activities in the open ocean and deep seabed.
119
      Christopher J. Carr and Harry N. Scheiber, ‘Dealing with a Resource Crisis: Regulatory
      Regimes for Managing the World’s Marine Fisheries’ (2002) 21 Stanford Environmental
      Law Journal, p. 45; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 65.
120
      Gjerde and Breide, supra note 8, p. vii.
121
      Carr and Scheiber, supra note 119, p. 53.
122
      Erik J. Molenaar, ‘Unregulated Deep Sea Fisheries: A Need for a Multi-Level Approach’
      (2004) 19(3) International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, p. 223; Lee A. Kimball,
      ‘Deep Sea Fisheries of the High Seas: The Management Impasse’ (2004) 19(3) Interna-
      tional Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, p. 260.
123
      Earle, supra note 3, pp. 182–184; Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 66.
124
      Carr and Scheiber, supra note 119, p. 59; Rosemary Rayfuse, ‘The Challenge of
      Sustainable High Seas Fisheries’ in Nico Schrijver and Friedl Weiss (eds), International
      Law and Sustainable Development. Principles and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden,
      2004), p. 474.
16                  Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
lines and hooks.125 Some regional fisheries organisations managing tuna and
other highly migratory and straddling stocks are beginning to implement a
precautionary approach to these fisheries imposing measures such as lower
quotas, spatial, time and gear restrictions on the fishing vessels of their mem-
ber States.126 These organisations are also beginning to examine the need for
ecosystem based management of these fisheries which takes into account the
associated and dependent species and habitats affected by fishing for the target
species.127 Implementation of precautionary and ecosystem based measures in
the conservation and management of high seas fisheries, however, is far from
comprehensive and still in the embryonic stages of development.128
    Marine scientists are also concerned about the threats to deep water demer-
sal fish which are concentrated on the continental slopes and around deep sea
habitats such as seamounts.129 These include species such as the grenadiers,
smoothheads, orange roughy and the pelagic armourhead. Unlike many in-
shore and coastal fish species they exhibit characteristics such as great longev-
ity, low fecundity and high age at first maturity.130 They can also be endemic
to a particular deep sea habitat.131 These features of deep water fish species
inhibit their ability to recover quickly from over exploitation. The methods
used to fish for these species, especially bottom trawling, have major impacts
on their surrounding habitat and on associated and dependent ecosystems.132
As well as crushing fragile deep sea coral structures, bottom trawlers sweep
up large numbers of non target species. All deep sea fish caught in a trawl
including non target species will be dead on reaching the surface as a result
of damage to their skins and pressure and temperature changes.133 In some
oceanic regions there are already examples of deep water species being com-
mercially exploited to levels close to extinction.134
125
      Byatt et al., supra note 17, pp. 306–307; Gjerde and Breide, supra note 8, p. 6.
126
      Rayfuse, supra note 124, pp. 473–474.
127
      Ibid., pp. 474–476.
128
      Ibid., pp. 474–475.
129
      Probert, supra note 47, p. 602; Koslow, supra note 54, p. 43; John M. Gordon, ‘Deep
      Water Fish and Fisheries’ in Hjalmar Thiel and J. Anthony Koslow (eds), Managing Risks
      to Biodiversity and The Environment on the High Seas, Including Tools such as Marine
      Protected Areas – Scientific Requirements and Legal Aspects (Federal Agency for Nature
      Conservation, Bonn, 2001), p. 31.
130
      Koslow, supra note 54, p. 43; Gordon, supra note 129, p. 32.
131
      Ibid.
132
      Gordon, supra note 129, p. 33.
133
      Ibid.
134
      Koslow, supra note 54, pp. 46–47.
             Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment                17
Threats to the marine environment from vessel source discharges and deliber-
ate disposal of waste did not come to prominence until the latter decades of the
twentieth century with the increase in world oil trade and major disasters such
as the Torrey Canyon and Amoco Cadiz groundings where the effects of oil on
marine life were clearly visible to the human eye.135 Prior to these disasters,
the oceans were used as an uncontrolled rubbish dump absorbing oil and toxic
chemicals, untreated sewage and garbage from land and vessel sources, mine
tailings, dredged material and nuclear waste.136 Indiscriminate disposal at sea
of waste arising from human activities has deleterious effects on the entire
marine environment including the open ocean and the deep seabed beyond
national jurisdiction. Although the proportion of contaminants introduced into
the sea from vessel sources is small when compared to land based sources
of marine pollution, the risks associated with such disposal are high.137 The
physical impacts of waste disposal include burial of marine organisms, in-
creased suspended solids and habitat destruction caused by sedimentation.138
Hazardous and noxious substances disposed at sea can also have toxic effects
on marine organisms and result in contamination of human food sources.
Some persistent wastes, such as plastics and synthetic materials left suspended
in the water column may harm marine life and interfere with navigation.139
Alien species introduced into the deep sea environment, through the practice
of ballast water exchange on the high seas, can adversely affect the delicate
balance of deep sea ecosystems and destroy fragile habitats.140
    The effects of uncontrolled waste disposal at sea are not confined to coastal
or surface waters. Through the action of currents and gravity, most pollutants
135
      P.M. McGrath and Michael Julian, ‘Protection of the Marine Environment from Shipping
      Operations: Australian and International Responses’ in Donald R. Rothwell and Sam
      Bateman (eds), Navigational Rights and Freedoms and the New Law of the Sea (Martinus
      Nijhoff, The Hague, 2000), pp. 188–189.
136
      United Nations Atlas of the Oceans, Dumping at Sea, <www.oceansatlas.com.unatlas/
      uses/oceandumpingwastes/dumping/dumping.htm>, 30 November 2007.
137
      Erik J. Molenaar, Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution (Kluwer Law
      International, The Hague, 1998), p. 18, n. 12: “Vessel-source pollution accounts for 12%
      of all marine pollution, land based and atmospheric for 77%, ocean dumping for 10% and
      offshore production for 1% (GESAMP Report No. 39, p. 88).”
138
      Marcia Collie and Julie Russo, ‘Deep-Sea Biodiversity and the Impacts of Ocean
      Dumping’ (2000) National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, <www.oar.
      noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_oceandumping.html>, 30 November 2007.
139
      Gjerde and Breide, supra note 8, pp. 6–7.
140
      Nicholas Bax et al., ‘Marine Invasive Species: A Threat to Global Biodiversity’ (2003)
      27(4) Marine Policy p. 314.
18                  Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
and dumped materials will eventually find their way to the deep sea floor. Sci-
entists from the US have conducted studies into the effects of large amounts
of sewage sludge dumped annually at a deep water site 106 miles off the coast
on the continental rise adjacent to the New York Bight.141 Over a period of
years this research has demonstrated that the sludge material had significant
effects on the metabolism, diet and composition of the benthic inhabitants
of the dump site itself and the surrounding area. Some organisms such as
urchins, starfish and sea cucumbers increased in abundance from ingesting the
organic material found in sewage sludge while others diminished as a result of
the toxic effects of heavy metals.142
    In regulating the discharge of vessel source pollutants into the ocean, the
international community has adopted a zonal approach with more stringent re-
strictions imposed on vessel discharges closer to land and special areas declared
in waters within national jurisdiction where all discharges are prohibited. This
incremental approach increases the potential for harmful effects from vessel
source pollutants in the open ocean and deep seabed environments beyond
national jurisdiction. Initially deliberate dumping of waste material at sea
was controlled in a permissive manner by specifying lists of those substances
which could be dumped under certain conditions. This approach has now been
reversed with the majority of dumping prohibited and the onus incumbent on
a State which proposes to dump material, to justify its actions.143
141
      Collie and Russo, supra note 138.
142
      Ibid.
143
      Olav S. Stokke, ‘Beyond Dumping? The Effectiveness of the London Convention’ in
      Olav S. Stokke and O.B. Thommessen (eds), Yearbook of International Cooperation on
      Environment and Development (Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, 1998), pp. 40–41.
144
      Jan M. Markussen, ‘Deep Seabed Mining and the Environment: Consequences,
      Perceptions and Regulations’ in H.O. Bergesen and G. Parmann (eds), Green Globe
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment          19
in 1994, the International Seabed Authority (ISA) has continued this research
with the seven licensed deep seabed mining exploration contractors and deep
sea research scientists.
    There are three main groups of deep seabed minerals: polymetallic nodules,
polymetallic sulphides and cobalt rich crusts.145 Most research has concen-
trated on polymetallic nodules which are currently the subject of exploration
by the seven licensed contractors. Polymetallic nodules are found in the soft
sediment of the deep sea floor. They form a hard substrata for the benthic
organisms inhabiting the sediment.146 The deep seabed mining collection sys-
tem at the seafloor consists of a motorised metal collector and crusher which
will sweep up the majority of nodules in any particular area.147 This results
in severe disturbance of the surrounding soft sediment and the destruction of
much of the benthal fauna.148 Organisms in and around the tracks of the collec-
tor unit will be buried by the disturbed sediment.149 In addition, suspension of
a sedimentation plume behind the collector containing particulate matter will
result in chemical changes to the bottom water.150 Even for stalked organisms
which penetrate higher into the water column and free floating organisms,
mining operations will result in disturbance of food sources such as drift-
ing plankton.151 Scientists have estimated that benthic communities may take
decades to recover from these impacts.152 At the surface, disposal of waste
water containing particulate matter and trace metals may also interfere with
photosynthetic processes for marine life in the productive epipelagic layer.153
    The environmental effects of polymetallic sulphide and cobalt rich crust
mining are not as well researched as those associated with polymetallic nod-
ule mining but some impacts are predictable. A high potential for adverse
environmental impacts exists where polymetallic suphides are co-located
with the unique and fragile ecosystems situated at active hydrothermal vents.
Destruction of the vent organisms and habitat is likely to occur with large dis-
turbances of sediment and chemical changes caused by particulate plumes.154
Deep sea habitats in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, such as hydro-
thermal vents, submarine trenches and cold seeps are the subject of intense
interest from bioprospectors interested in the commercial potential of their
endemic species and marine scientists who are conducting progressively more
invasive experiments at these sites.158 Only a small cross section of known
hydrothermal vents have so far been regularly visited by bioprospectors and
marine scientists who often work in conjunction.159 The emphasis of scientific
research expeditions to these sites has switched from simple discovery and
exploration to experiments which involve installation of scientific equipment
on the seafloor and the collection of biological and geological samples from
particular sites.160 In situ experiments may introduce the alien elements of
light and noise into these deep sea habitats and induce changes in water tem-
perature. Pollution may also occur from biological debris and other biological
material imported into the environment.161
155
      International Seabed Authority, Polymetallic Sulphides Brochure, <www.isa.org.jm/en/
      seabedarea/TechBrochures/ENG8.pdf> at 30 November 2007.
156
      International Seabed Authority, Cobalt Rich Crusts Brochure, <www.isa.org.jm/en/
      seabedarea/TechBrochures/ENG8.pdf> at 30 November 2007.
157
      Ibid.
158
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 18.
159
      Lyle Glowka, ‘Putting Marine Scientific Research on a Sustainable Footing at
      Hydrothermal Vents’ (2003) 27(4) Marine Policy p. 303.
160
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 18; Glowka, supra note 159, p. 304; Juniper, supra note 80,
      p. 93.
161
      Baker et al., supra note 49, p. 18.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment             21
162
      Glowka, supra note 159, p. 308.
163
      Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, 2007,
      <www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm>, 2 December 2007; Nicholas Stern et al., Stern
      Review: The Economics of Climate Change (HM Treasury, London, 2006); B.L. Preston
      and R.N. Jones, Climate Change Impacts on Australia and the Benefits of Early Action
      to Reduce Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. A consultancy report for the Australian
      Business Roundtable on Climate Change (CSIRO Canberra, Canberra, ACT, 2006).
22                  Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The ocean is already a major sink for carbon
dioxide because of its capacity to readily absorb excess atmospheric carbon
dioxide and convert it to soluble form. A prominent deep sea scientist, An-
thony Koslow, estimates that approximately 5.4 billion tonnes (or gigatonnes)
of carbon are now released into the atmosphere each year as carbon dioxide
from the burning of fossil fuels and that a third of that is taken up by the
ocean.164 Augmenting the rate at which the ocean absorbs carbon dioxide is
the fundamental objective of many of the climate change mitigation schemes
now being proposed and trialled.
    One of the earliest climate change mitigation schemes proposed involves
permanent sequestration of carbon dioxide emissions from large point sources
such as power plants using fossil fuels, steel works and fuel processing plants
in sub seabed geological formations.165 The principal risk associated with this
method of carbon dioxide disposal in the sub-seabed is the potential for leak-
age of carbon dioxide and any other substances in or mobilized by the carbon
dioxide stream into the marine environment.166 Leakage of carbon dioxide
or associated substances within the carbon dioxide stream including heavy
metals into the deep sea environment can alter the marine chemistry of the
water column and lead to adverse effects on the interconnected web of spe-
cies, habitats and ecosystems.167
    As the sub-seabed carbon dioxide sequestration process essentially involves
the deliberate disposal of waste material at sea, it falls within the regulatory
ambit of both the 1972 Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution
by Dumping of Wastes and other Matter (London Convention) and the 1996
Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dump-
ing of Wastes and other Matter (London Protocol).168 The London Convention
applies to disposal of waste material in any area of the water column but not to
disposal in the seabed.169 Dumping of waste materials generated by industrial
164
      Tony Koslow, The Silent Deep (UNSW Press, University of New South Wales, Sydney,
      Australia, 2007) p. 156.
165
      Ibid., p. 157; IMO Press Briefing 5, 9 February 2007, <www.imo.org/Safety/mainframe.
      asp?topic_id=1472&4doc_id=7772>, 1 December 2007.
166
      Juan C. Abanedes et al., IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
      (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005), p. 18; IMO, CO2 Sequestration
      Frequently Asked Questions, <www.imo.org/environment/mainframe.asp?topic_
      id=1548>, 1 December 2007
167
      Ibid.; Koslow, supra note 164, p. 160.
168
      1972 Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and
      other Matter, 29 December 1972, 11 ILM 1294; 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the
      Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 7 November
      1996, 36 ILM 1 (1997). .
169
      1972 London Convention, Article III(1) and (3).
             Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment   23
or processing operations into the water column has been prohibited under the
London Convention since 1996 unless the particular materials appear on a
reverse list of industrial wastes that can be dumped.170 This list does not make
specific reference to carbon dioxide so unless it can be included in some of
the more general definitions of industrial wastes, its disposal into the water
column by States Parties to the London Convention is prohibited but its stor-
age in the sub-seabed is not prohibited by the Convention.
    A fundamental premise of the London Protocol is that Contracting Parties
should avoid using the sea for the dumping of wastes and that any exceptional
dumping of waste at sea should be subject to rigorous risk assessment, control
and scientifically based procedures for disposal. Dumping of wastes or other
matter is prohibited under the London Protocol except for those materials
specifically listed in Annex I. The definition of “dumping” under Article 1.4.3
of the London Protocol includes “any storage of wastes or other matters in
the seabed or subsoil thereof” and therefore the sub-seabed sequestration of
carbon dioxide would have been prohibited under the provisions of the Proto-
col without special qualification. Amendments to Annex I permitting storage
of carbon dioxide under the seabed were adopted on 2 November 2006 at
the First Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the London Protocol.171 The
amendments provide a basis for regulating this method of disposal and have
been supplemented by Specific Guidelines for Assessment of Carbon Diox-
ide Streams for Disposal into Sub-seabed Geological Formations adopted by
the Contracting Parties at their Second Consultative Meeting in November
2007.172
    The Specific Guidelines take a precautionary approach to the process re-
quiring Contracting Parties under whose jurisdiction or control such activities
are conducted to issue a permit for the disposal subject to stringent conditions
being fulfilled.173 The chemical and physical properties of carbon dioxide
streams proposed for sub-seabed sequestration must be rigorously analysed174
and alternative methods of land based disposal appropriately considered.175
In addition permit applicants must provide a geological assessment of the
proposed site which includes information on its long term storage integrity,
potential migration and leakage pathways over time and potential effects on
the marine environment of leakage of carbon dioxide and possibilities for
170
      Ibid., Article IV, Annex I, paragraph 11.
171
      IMO Press Briefing, supra note 165.
172
      IMO Doc., I:\LC\29\4.doc.
173
      Ibid., Section 9.
174
      Ibid., Section 4.
175
      Ibid., Section 3.
24                   Protecting the Oceans Beyond National Jurisdiction
176
      Ibid., Section 6.2.
177
      Ibid., Section 6.6.
178
      Ibid., Section 7.6.
179
      Ibid., Section 7.11.
180
      The London Protocol currently has 31 States Parties, <www.imo.org/home.asp?topic_
      id=1488>, 2 December 2007.
181
      IMO, CO2 Frequently Asked Questions, supra note 166.
182
      Koslow, supra note 164, p. 159; Tatjana Rosen, ‘Open Ocean Iron Fertilisation’ in Cutler
      J. Cleveland (ed.), Encyclopedia of Earth (Environmental Information Coalition, National
      Council for Science and the Environment, Washington D.C., 2007), <www.eoearth.org/
      article/Open_ocean_iron_fertilization, 1 December 2007>.
            Chapter 1 – The Impact of Human Uses on the Marine Environment          25
other greenhouse gases and the sinking of phytoplankton blooms into the deep
ocean may reduce oxygen levels at these depths with adverse consequences
for fisheries.183 Notwithstanding these uncertainties a number of commercial
ventures interested in open ocean fertilization have sprung up and are attracting
investment for these processes.184 At their Twenty-ninth Consultative and Sec-
ond Consultative Meetings, the London Convention and Protocol Contracting
Parties considered a report from their Scientific Groups and other submissions
concerning open ocean fertilization and expressed the view that knowledge
about the effectiveness and potential environmental impacts of ocean iron fer-
tilization was currently insufficient to justify large scale projects and that these
could have negative impacts on the marine environment and human health.185
They also agreed that this process falls within their regulatory competence and
that they would further study this issue from scientific and legal perspectives.
While this expression of concern is reassuring, the relatively low level of Con-
tracting Parties to the London Protocol in particular is a potential limitation on
the effectiveness of any future regulatory provisions.186
E. Conclusion
The interdependence of the open ocean and deep sea environments underscores
the need for legal and institutional arrangements which allow for integrated
protection of the marine environment beyond national jurisdiction and the
establishment of connections between global and regional bodies with regula-
tory competence in these areas. The rise in human activities beyond the off-
shore zones of coastal States poses actual and potential threats to the physical
characteristics and biodiversity of the open ocean and deep sea environments.
Arbitrary human intrusions into this largely unexplored marine domain have
the potential to harm the intricate links between complex marine ecosystems
and to erode components of marine biodiversity. Protection of this vast area
from the range of established and emerging threats posed by intensifying hu-
man activity requires concentrated global, regional and sectoral investment in
coordinating and extending the applicable environmental protection regimes.
Chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5 examine the current legal principles and institutional
arrangements which apply to the protection and preservation of the marine
183
      Ibid.
184
      Rosen, supra note 182.
185
      IMO Press Briefing 40. 16 November 2007, <www.imo.org/includes/blastDataOnly.asp/
      data_id%3D20395/Pressbriefing16-11-07.doc>.
186
      Ibid.
Other documents randomly have
       different content
La langue internationale auxiliaire, congrés de Grenoble, 1904. Séances
générales, eldonata ĉe la grupo Esperantista Pariza, 28, Rue Serpente,
Paris. 28 pp., kosto 50 c.
Nia agema Dovera Grupo perdis la servojn de ĝia antaŭa tre energia
Sekretario, Sro Geddes, sed ni devas gratuli la grupon trovinte novan
Sekretarion en Sro Chitty, kies fervoreco estas sufiĉe bone-konata. Sir
William Crundall, la eminenta Urbestro de la havena-urbo, konsentis
fariĝi la grupan Prezidanton—honoron pro kiu ni kore dankas lin.
Sro René Deshays, la fama verkisto de la bela kanto La Vojo, verkis, por
la Kunveno, novan himnon al Dro Zamenhof.
DONI AŬ NE DONI!
E.W.
Unu viro repuŝis mian manon, kaj dua diris: "Ke Dio benu vian korpon
kaj animon, vi bonkora idiotulino! Ĉu vi ne povas vidi ke tio ne donos al
ni unu duonon da plenbuŝo da pano, kaj vi estus malvarma la tutan
vintron?"
Estis vere, ĉar ili estis inter 400 kaj 500 viroj.
De tiu tempo mi ĉiam portis mian monujon kiam mi promenis, ĝis fine
mi ne havis plu moneron, krom ŝilingo, kiun mi gardis por aĉeti
poŝtmarkojn.
Li unue min rigardegis, tiam li ekkriis "Ho vi bona kara estaĵino, diru al
mi vian nomon kaj adreson. Mi repagos ĝin al vi."
"Ne," mi diris. "Donu ŝilingon kiam vi havos monon, al iu via kunulo kiu
ĝin bezonas."
Mi petis lin neniam blasfemi, sed mi diris al li mian nomon kaj, kun
manpremo, ni disigis.
Unu el miaj amikoj, pastro kiu pli frue estis advokato, alvenis al mi kaj
sin turnis por akompani min. Mi kredas ke, vidante la manpremon, li
pensis ke mi monon donacis, ĉar li ekkomencis longan predikon pri la
malbonmoreco de nediskreta almozdono. Li min sciigis ke oni multege
oferdonis pro la 2,000 senlaboruloj, ke komitato el viroj saĝaj kaj
sindonemaj informiĝis pri ĉies karaktero, tial ke nur merituloj ricevu
helpon.
Kvankam oni ofte aŭdas malafablajn rimarkojn pri Irlando kaj la tieaj
malriĉaj loĝantoj, ĝi estas sendube tre interesa lando kie pasigi la
somerajn libertempojn. Aparte de la belegaj pejzaĝoj kaj interesaj
antikvaj konstruaĵoj, oni allogiĝas per la kuriozaj kutimoj, spirito kaj
boneco de la vilaĝanoj. Eble multe da la eraraj ideoj pri ili deveniĝis de
la pentraĵoj kiujn oni kelkafoje vidas, kiuj image ilustras "Irlandan
Vivon." Tiuj ĉi ofte estas tiel ridindaj, kiel ili estas malkorektaj; kaj se oni
demandus de malklera Angla laboristo "Kiel vivadas la Irlandano?" Eble li
dirus "Li estas viro kiu manĝas nur terpomojn kaj loĝas ĉe malgranda
malpura dometo, kune kun siaj porkoj, kortbirdoj kaj azeno." Certe mi
ofte estas vidinta la kortbirdojn en la kuirejo, sed nur unufoje mi estas
vidinta la porkon dormanta paceme sur la pordŝtupo kun la nudpiedaj
geknaboj ludantaj apude. La malaltaj dometoj kun blankigitaj muroj kaj
dikaj pajlaj tegmentoj estas tre pentrindaj; sed malfeliĉe la luantoj ne
ĉiam sin ĝenas pri la eksteraj riparoj ĉar mi rimarkis kelkafoje, ke kiam
la kamentubo rompiĝis, oni ĝin anstataŭis per ligna barelo sen aŭ supro
aŭ malsupro.
Oni rakontas ŝercan rakonton pri la longeco de la Irlando mejlo kiu estas
1,440 futoj pli longe ol la Angla mejlo. Foje viro kiu vojaĝis ĉe County
Antrim (kie oni nune kalkulas Angle) demandis de policano "Kiom da
mejloj malproksime estas B—?" La policano respondis "Nu! estas nur 12
mejloj se vi marŝas sur la maldekstra flanko de la vojo, sed, se vi
marŝas sur la dekstra flanko estas 15½ mejloj." Li poste klarigis ke oni
ne estis forpreninta la malnovajn Irlandajn mejlstangojn kiam oni
enmetis la Anglajn sur la kontraŭa flanko de la vojo. Ankaŭ mi ofte estas
rimarkinta ke kiam vilaĝano diras ke estas "nur unu mejlo kaj peco al X
—," la peco estas multe pli longa ol la mejlo!!
Sed tio ĉi estas nur bagatelo kaj oni multe lernas per sperto.
FREMDULO EN FREMDALANDO.
De C. W. T. Reeve.
Traduko:
Kelkaj trompas siajn korojn, kaj, ĉe aliaj, la koroj trompas ilin mem.
Meriti honoron sen ricevi ĝin estas pli bone ol ricevi honoron sen meriti
ĝin.
Li, kiu ne prenos ekzemplon de aliaj, estos farata ekzemplon por aliaj.
Peko estas en ĉiu sankta homo, sed ĉiu sankta homo ne estas en peko.
KRESPO[1] PUNTA.
Materialo.
    Tri ovoj.
    Sama pezo da sukero.
    Sama pezo da tritika faruno.
    Sama pezo da freŝa butero.
    Da lakto sufiĉa kvanto.
Metodo.
Miksu la sukeron kune kun la faruno, rompu la ovojn, agitu la tuton
aldonante la varmetigitan buteron. Varmetigu lakton, kaj ĝin verŝu iom
post iom, evitante sekajn amasetojn. Parfumu per vanilo aŭ rumo. Hejtu
paton, ŝmiru ĝin zorge kaj tenu ĝin iom klina, prenu unu kuleron da
pasto, lasu ĝin flui en la paton donante al la kulero alternan movon, por
ke la pasto sterniĝu unuforme kaj maldike. Tuj kiam la krespo estas
orkolorigita, elprenu ĝin per tranĉilo, volvu ĝin ĉirkaŭ la tranĉila ŝtala
plato kaj metu sur pladon.
Tiuj krespoj, nomataj ankaŭ volvitaj krespoj, estas tre bonaj kiam ili
estas varmaj, sed ne malpli bonaj kiam ili estas malvarmaj. Oni povas
ilin konservi almenaŭ dum ok tagoj, se oni zorgas enmeti ilin en ladan
keston.
PIEDNOTO:
SAĜA HUNDO!
Viro, kiu zorgis grandan hundon por amiko kiu vojaĝis eksterlande,
malplaĉiĝis ĉar la besto ĉiam sidis en la plej bona seĝego.
Unu tagon ideo frapis lin. Li eniris la ĉambron kaj trovis la hundon en lia
kutima loko, tial li marŝis fenestron kaj kriis "Katoj! Katoj!"
La viro leviĝis por vidi tion kio okazas kaj la hundo saltis en la seĝegon.
F. E. Bearne (8225).
LA SINAPSEMERO.
Versigita de A. Motteau.
LA FRATOJ DE BIRCHINGTON’.
"Supreniru teren kaj alportu tien ĉi la viron, kies nomo aperas sur tiu ĉi
surskribeto. Mi trovas, ke lia ŝuldo tro pligrandiĝas, kaj li devos elpagi
ĝin tiun tagon mem. Foriru!"
Kie li estis? Nek en kelo, nek en preĝejo; li tute neniiĝis. Maltrankvile ili
atendis lian revenon ĝis la tagmezo, kiam palvizaĝa vilaĝano rapide
enkuris por sciigi ke li ĵus trovis la ĉefabaton en la kamparo mortinta.
"Ne timu, miaj filoj. Satano estas vere multepova, sed li ne povas venki
min, kiu estas ankoraŭ pli multepova. Mi devigos lin revivigi mian fraton,
Rikardon."
"Pardonu min, Sankta Moŝto, mi petegas, ĉar tio ne estis mia kulpo. Vi
baldaŭe vidos ke mi havis rajton. Rigardu en mian libregon jen aperas la
nomo—"R—— de Birchington’, kavaliro, loĝanto en Reculvers." Nu, li
estis Rikardo—aŭ R—— de Birchington’, li loĝadis ĉe Reculvers; ke li estis
pastro anstataŭ kavaliro ne estas mia eraro, sed de mia sekretario, kiu
malbone enskribis lian profesion. Pura animo?" kaj li ridegis. "Ekzamenu,
mi petas, la kolekton da pekoj."
Pro manko da spirado, li ĉesis, kaj Apoljono, kiu vane penis eviti la
fortajn batojn, murmuris kvazaŭ li ploris pro kolero kaj honto:—
"Ho! graseguloj! Ĉu vi ion aŭdis pri...." kaj tuj neniiĝis. La Infera Reĝo,
sidiĝanta en angulo, elpuŝis raŭkan, mokeman ridon, tordante sin de
ĝojo, ĉar li tre ŝatis la konsternemajn vizaĝojn, kiuj ĉiuparte ĉirkaŭturnis,
kvazaŭ por eltrovi la kaŭzon de tia dua malapero.
Sed lia plezuro daŭris nur mallongan tempon. Sankt’ Thomas’ hokis lin
per la kolo, kaj piedfrapis lin per fortaj batoj.
Post tiu parolado, okazis tondra bruego, kun flama ekbrilo, kaj oni ne
vidis plu la Diablon. Apenaŭ li foriris, kiam la tero denove malfermis, kaj
la korpo de malfeliĉa Roberto, elĵetinta el la truo ĝis la plafono, falis
pezeme sur la ŝtonplatojn.
De tiu tago, la karaktero de Roberto ŝanĝis. Li forlasis sian pekeman
vivadon, konfesis sin kaj longe pentofaris, kiam post senpekigo li eniris
la monaĥejon, en kiu, la legendo ĵuras, neniam antaŭe nek poste,
loĝadis monaĥo tiel pia kaj tiel bonfarema. Siajn posedaĵojn li ĉiujn
vendis, disdonante la plimulton da mono al la malriĉuloj de tiu kvartalo.
La restaĵon li aldonis al simila sumo provizita de Rikardo, kaj iom pli
malfrue la monaĥa preĝejo posedis du altajn kvadratajn turojn, kiujn la
vilaĝanoj nomis "La Dunaskitojn."
LA PATRUJO DE LA ROZESENCO.
H.B.M.
MIA LIBERTEMPO.
La Redaktoro.
ebookbell.com