TM ; Judicial enatce yma Reallm: “Ss WORM Jad Lota jLidictal toholnan Lavo pac Chsicer-consbraind Shautd be Magra eestenhp by et moral Gaceantevneral wm Jud aol dectitera Pun ples dealin ur legal v reairn Judge must batomc Clty to apply lore Usith broader ethical Umpli. on ectatow HART V FULLER debate on Lam = ConA’ Lhe node ef law —b WL OF morality ™ degal validity FULL - Inbexmal morality ef +0 trout - anjending UF- ~ ognoted — discuss on Nar tow - where, inmerat aus - comacdined egaliy void: ~ control disagreement - mralotionh blu LAM - Whiter Unjust loro ~ SO be cottedtarn” — Work 's LP- win The Concept OF Law - law & Sdttom, of mules dering Validity From Socval Comnenbovu ralnets Mon wera Prnaples- ok SNgUhes blco is , © Pamovey purer - Ruder Umpose Autida (eg ori minal dow prohiacting wart ae)TPS. x 2 Secondary ules — THR hat define how Laws ye Gite, CALOAAA | iimcge cue = > appliad (eg ~wiler of secoy ,chamge = and adjudi cotion ete) oc key ang ument ~ Hort a v y — ~ law’s Validity depends - if ik meets rittun af Legal Aytom Cif ita a Lore Mads ly proper proudure ) G BO Wek ew ods Mayon © a ~ daw cam be Unjust bik mainteins it degat © Sejetum sratus IF enacted Mou valid legal ..: Pretedioes - ~~ — Nazi Geumany - Lows that mandated Tactal —— AA CIMination amd persecution a 5 Bork ascgued - lows moral unjust bub cee _ Asgaty vatid- — Raje ching soinnmora) Lows — LAA We. — distinctoy) blu uw ode DW Ctegad varidity ) amd Law as tk Lt ty ne (moved — oad Covrecrnen) “i hs = — Rarwamd msralciy viewed Leper aketiy os — dow bared om aources and pocdiviee - nok r Mera content: = i — Pables!s Gite x in The Mocs OF law - adh Unawenges ~ Mosk lS oty rie= hw Omd Merality “Mddepla dabanepan eens d 4 - tows — moral principles — arm ak guna human henowiainr and Pometinp social Coopration Play ee las = how cease _y Wiomnat (procedural moratcty ) Wonreichy and tonal ct Seses to aehoie externad 7 Miorauty hitb bernture nesratity ) ~ Fu — 2 types ~ Sega privupte Fr Jaw to he vebid - Jaw mut be puloticty brown (Not secst) congbemtby appiied Avatuely Leable ows tumg 3 jada (pipe Le abe Peer \ Cb&UUCCEE Ej dd LLL beh @ ¢ dd ude ’ EL Z ffl. / ff lolg i j—f—form ifs Ah ab ah a} Yad) 4 cooee PVR eRAA® Fee Og rr Ce Chal & hi ain apa, LIEUCEEEE 1 ¢} Utes Wh dobate D vatdity oF Umjuak £000 @ fota of Marntity um lore ® Sudivor do cis! Maine ® trovlem of Nari Soro Manet vi bEVLIN eae ~ denate - WMV.Qed ™M TeAporte to Wwe oe Gay ae, decaminasizig homoiexuatity and proatuition mw Britain ~(seue? - Whothor tow shoud enforce mora Skamdoruds - Chem wie no dxedck hon Caured } — Detour Tah The Enforcomunt ef Moras (\aes) - tare how duchy dp uprolda sociary 'S moral dyvalut — RO Um private conduct / evem no hoxm & Couued Ab one — Sow -enfrrte weoratity @ Souaty's morality -enrential fer ckakluty © law — intervene ~prevent acts - Vidlate prdelic amoraidy - donor Cate direct horn (eg- homoaxustity , proititn) © Conridsred mapv ally UIA by Mafor - Chiminaliged e'Reasononie Mam Tert ~ if yearo anne funds Untaun act—immeral a en - v * justia leaad phuiition J ml minadr 2 iow> Word - Un Law, Linexty and Morals challenger duvind Waw — Aaw Shoutd enka unk a Puvate conduct torn ik coures home to obese ~ low Smads nok eomFovco morality « reeks axis, nce co tte eae aera hone to be tog ally prohibcked Gr onrrinaliged ass Wines Clcnn Stucsh mull) G law shoud onby witernone vm wndividirod Actors to purenk howm to ob - G tivate moral croice — not reqguisted Untorss Carre direct hon OQ Morality ence & chomp: ors Ure Ly enfercomant of morality - Suppress -tndi F — opps Som, disonminaticin @ Cutique of Reasenalls Mon Te!” Ly yusk vecauee majority byidi Sometaing Winmeral - dount meom - smoutd be dLezal te Re — Role OMe - Movatikay a 4, vie Individual Freedom . = Majority Moratiby y = Cramqng moral Stamdatide + prin PRINTED MATERIAL — eg “TABLE "3 Eede iVuveen 2 EEEEE ED AV AY ED AY ay Mh A ay a OR ‘pH ddd de¥?e © I f se iE, oe a PEEP rrr reView on Law and Morality Eee | Role of Moral Law Philosophical Foundation Example Issues (eg Homosexuality) | Morality can HART V/S DEVLIN Hart Law and morality are separate. Laws should not enforce personal morality unless harm is caused to others. influence law but should not be directly enforced. People should be free to make personal choices as long as they don't harm others Follows the Harm Principle (John Stuart Mill). Only actions that harm others should be criminalized. Supports decriminalization of homosexuality, arguing that private actions shouldn't be a matter for the law unless they harm others, Patrick Devlin Law should enforce societal morality to maintain social | ‘cohesion and prevent moral breakdown, 1ws should regulate personal behavior if it violates societal | moral standards, even if there's no harm to others. Believes society's moral order | should be preserved by law. A moral society needs laws that protect its values. ‘Opposes decriminalization of homosexuality, arguing that laws | should regulate immoral acts to | preserve societal values. Freedom ys. Control Emphasizes individual freedom and personal autonomy, limiting legal interference in private lives. Believes that laws should regulate | behavior for the good of the community, even if it limits individual freedoms. View on Social Moralit Society's collective moral views should not dictate the law; laws should be neutral and protect and the law should reflect and. enforce them to prevent social individual rights. CASE LAWS ‘ee an intense example of how morality and law can Society's moral views are crucial, | collapse. | In R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884), We f rash Four men were stranded in the middie of the ocean, will no Fock laa can nication, They were in desperate need of survival The eaptnin, Thomas Dudley, came up oth in extreme solution: one of them would have o be killed so that he others could survive cating his flesh. The plan was agreed upon by Duley and Edward Stephens, but Ned Brooks was opposed, and Richard Parker, the fourth crew member, wasn’t even told, In the end, they killed Richard Parker and ate his body to survive.