Initiating Coverage - Paradigm Capital
Initiating Coverage - Paradigm Capital
Rating: Buy
Healthy Beginnings, an M&A Machine with a
Initiating Coverage Large Runway for Growth
12-Month Target: $4.10
Investment Thesis
Price $3.42
We believe WELL is in the early innings of establishing itself as a technology leader in
Ticker WELL-T
FYE 31-Mar the digital healthcare sector. For investors it is an M&A compounder which can drive
Potential ROR 20% value within the massive healthcare market that is ripe for digital transformation. WELL
Avg 3-month daily vol. (000s) 766 owns 20 primary healthcare medical clinics, is Canada’s third-largest EMR (electronic
Shares O/S Basic (M) 118
FD (M) 118
medical record) provider, and operates a national telehealth service. The company
Market Cap Basic ($M) 404 invested in a number of other technology assets. Since early 2018, WELL has
FD ($M) 404 completed 15 transactions, including 12 acquisitions and three equity investments
Net Debt at Q1 ($M) 10
driving rapid growth from revenue of zero in 2017 to a current revenue rate of ~$44
PCI Est FY20e FY21e FY22e
million. Leadership has shown an exceptional capabiilty to execute disciplined
Revenue ($M) 43.5 56.4 68.5 accretive M&A and to acquire valuable technology that can scale. Secular changes
previously u/r u/r u/r accelerated by the pandemic are strong tailwinds supporting WELL’s strategy to
Gross Profit ($M) 16.9 22.4 28.2
leverage technology and drive efficiencies in healthcare, in turn improving patient
previously u/r u/r u/r
Adj. EBITDA ($M) -0.5 4.4 6.2 outcomes and generating shareholder value.
previously u/r u/r u/r
Other Data FY20e FY21e FY22e Highlights
Gross Margin 38.8% 39.8% 41.1%
-1.2% 7.8% 9.0%
Rapid Growth Through M&A; No Signs of Slowing Down | We have seen a
Adj. EBITDA Margin
Adj. EPS ($0.08) ($0.05) ($0.05) highly effective and disciplined approach toward M&A. Recent technology targets
Consensus Est FY20e FY21e FY22e have been acquired at ~3.0x EV/Revenue, and ~5.0x EBITDA for clinical assets.
Revenue ($M) 43.1 58.9 79.6 Structuring its deals with a combination of shares and performance targets has
Gross Profit ($M) 17.3 25.0 32.7
made transactions very accretive. The company’s EMR strategy has been
Adj. EBITDA ($M) -1.2 3.6 6.7
executed particularly well. Consolidating an open-sourced ecosystem and bringing
it toward feature parity with competitors has led to WELL having one of the leading
EMR platforms in Canada, acquired at a fraction of the price when compared to
precedent transactions. Often overlooked by traditional measures is the value of
the company’s captive base of physicians on its EMR platform and growing
technology stack.
Not Their First Rodeo | Some investors may remember CEO Hamed Shahbazi
from TIO Networks, which was acquired by PayPal in 2017, for $302 million. Mr.
Shahbazi is joined by several ex-TIO personnel who offer significant bench
strength in operations, M&A and capital markets strategy. In addition to a similar
team, we see similarities in strategy: developing valuable and scalable technology
off of a core set of physical hard assets.
Massive Market Ready for Change | There are 45,000 general practice and
family physicians in Canada, growing 4% year-over-year; nevertheless, five million
Canadians do not have a family doctor. COVID-19 has accelerated the uptake in
Source: FactSet, Company filings, Paradigm Capital Inc.
telehealth solutions. Looking south of the border, we see digitally enabled
Company description: WELL Health Technologies is an
healthcare providers with upwards of 50% of all patient touch-points occurring
acquisition-focused healthcare provider that owns and digitally. While in Canada, pre-pandemic, telehealth was only ~7% of all visits.
operates clinics, while selling workflow-enhancing software There is a large opportunity catch-up by leveraging technology to optimize the
solutions to clinics across Canada. primary care system. WELL is the best positioned player in Canada to capitalize
on this opportunity.
Valuation & Conclusion
We are initiating coverage of WELL Health Technologies with a Buy rating and $4.10
target (7.6x fiscal 2022e EV/Sales), with the stock trading at 5.9x calendar 2022e
versus peers at 6.9x. We view WELL as an attractive way for investors to capitalize on
accelerating trends in digitally enabling healthcare delivery. We see opportunity for the
company to drive shareholder returns through further M&A activity within a massive
healthcare market.
Table of Contents
Canadian Healthcare: Ripe for Disruption ......................................................................................... 3
Growth Strategy Poised to Strengthen Tech Stack & Help Gain Market Share .............................. 12
Valuation ......................................................................................................................................... 15
Risks ............................................................................................................................................... 17
1
https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/physicians-in-canada-2018.pdf
2
https://www.cihi.ca/en/physicians-in-canada
3
https://www.statista.com/statistics/831118/canada-family-general-practitioners-by-province/
4
https://www.cma.ca/quick-facts-canadas-physicians
Company History
WELL is headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia and was incorporated in 2010 as Wellness
Lifestyles Inc., a company focused on wellness and yoga apparel. The company transitioned to owning
and operating primary clinics in 2018 and changed its name from Wellness Lifestyles Inc. to WELL
Health Technologies. WELL went public in 2016 through a reverse takeover (RTO) with Movarie
Capital. In January 2020, the company graduated from the TSX Venture Exchange to the main TSX
Exchange, resulting in increased exposure and higher trading volumes in WELL’s stock.
WELL has built a scalable business model by structuring the company into five business units with an
over-arching shared services infrastructure to support these business units. Shared services include
finance, HR, IT, corporate development (acquisitions), marketing and investor relations. The five
business units are structured to be able to easily integrate new acquisitions, thereby creating a
scalable acquisition model. The five business units are as follows:
1. WELL Clinic Network: Includes 19 wholly owned primary care clinics and the company’s 51%
majority ownership investments in Spring Medical Centre and SleepWorks Medical. This unit is led
by Dr. Michael Frankel, the company’s Chief Medical Officer.
2. WELL EMR Group (WEG): Includes the company’s EMR assets obtained through the acquisition
of seven EMR vendors. WEG is led by Arjun Kumar who joined WELL through the acquisition of
KAI Innovations in 2019.
3. WELL Digital Health Apps (WDHA): Includes the company’s digital health-related acquisitions
and investments such as Insig Corp. and Phelix.ai. WDHA is led by the recently hired Shervin
Bakhtiari.
4. WELL Cybersecurity: Includes the proposed acquisition of the services division of Cycura. Will
be led by Iain Paterson, who is currently Managing Director at Cycura.
5. U.S. Division: Includes the company’s equity investment in Circle Medical, based in San
Francisco, California.
Total Purchase
Date Type Target Description Percentage
Price
Source: Healthcare Growth Partners, Semi-Annual Market Review January 2020 (See Supplemental for table)
Attractive Digital Assets: There is a large opportunity for the healthcare system and clinicians to
benefit from optimizing resources and saving costs, simply by implementing technology that is already
in existence. Management has outlined a few subsectors of interest, including telehealth, online
booking, automated check-in, billing as a service, cybersecurity, patient portal, precision medical and
clinical assistant. Management has indicated that the company will be launching an OSCAR “app
marketplace” which allows third-party developers and applications to connect to the WELL Network of
over 1,900 clinics and 10,000 physicians. WELL would certify the apps in its marketplace and assist in
selling the apps into its EMR network in return for a revenue share with the app developer. We believe
the OSCAR app marketplace is an ideal “hunting” ground for WELL to make additional acquisitions or
equity investments. The company has already made investments in telehealth though Insig, clinical
assistant through Phelix.ai and announced a cybersecurity investment in Cycura. According to
management, the company is currently testing online booking and automated check-in applications in
its corporate-owned WELL clinics in Vancouver. WELL is also already providing billing-as-a-service to
~30 clinics in its EMR network.
Telehealth: In its recent ramp-up of activity, WELL has entered into a strategic alliance agreement
with Insig which allows WELL to commercialize the Insig’s virtual care platform on a private-label basis
under the brand “VirtualClinic+”. Launched in early March, VirtualClinic+ is a web-based telehealth
platform that connects patients to physicians through video, phone and secure messaging without
needing to download an app. Adoption of the solution was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The VirtualClinic+ solution has a low-touch registration requirement which enables patients to self-
select their healthcare provider, as opposed to competing app-based platforms that require more
extensive registration documents which they use to auto-match patients with clinicians. WELL’s
platform is flipping this model on its head and giving patients the autonomy to select a clinician with
characteristics that are conducive to their best experience (e.g., language, gender, specialty). The
platform reached a peak of 1,000 appointments per day by May and is hitting that benchmark multiple
times a week. We believe WELL’s VirtualClinic+ is one of the top six telehealth platforms in Canada
along with TELUS, Loblaw, Maple, Dialogue and Tia Health. Incidentally, Tia Health is operated by
Insig, and WELL is the largest shareholder in Insig, so WELL has two of the top six telehealth
platforms in the country.
While the core patient-base of its owned and operated clinics is ~600,000, WELL stands to gain
access to patients seeking remote care across Canada through its easy-to-use website. It is worth
noting that the adoption of telemedicine can be as high as 50%, as seen in California-based care
manager Kaiser Permanente, who has reported that more than half of all appointments have been
conducted through telemedicine for years prior to the pandemic.5 In contrast, a 2019 Canadian survey
found that only 7% of Canadians had ever connected with their care provider by e-mail, 6% through
SMS or an app, and 4% through video.6
AI-powered Clinical Assistant: Through a strategic investment of $250,000 in Phelix.ai, and a
coinciding alliance agreement, WELL gained broad rights to use and sublicense Phelix.ai’s clinical
assistant automation software aimed at speeding up workflows. 7
Cybersecurity: In announcing its acquisition of Cycura’s services division, WELL indicated that it is
looking to grow the portfolio of products and services under the Cycura brand of healthcare-focused
cybersecurity solutions.8 This is an important factor in clinics looking to digitize. A key barrier is
ensuring proper security around healthcare data.
Circle Medical: In November 2018, WELL announced a strategic investment in Circle Medical. Circle
Medical operates a modern primary care practice in San Francisco. The digitally enabled primary
healthcare practice offers telemedicine and is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco
(UCSF). The small $200,000 investment into Circle also includes an agreement to explore how
technologies could be leveraged into the Canadian landscape.
Source: National Health Expenditure Database, Canadian Institute for Health Information
5
https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/virtual-care-moves-toward-the-frontline-of-provider-patient-relationships/516025/
6
https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/what-we-do/news-events/webinars/3786-access-to-digital-health-services-2019-survey-of-canadians-summary-report/view-document
7
https://www.well.company/for-investors/news-releases/well-health-announces-digital-health-investment-and--strategic-partnership-with-phelixai
8
https://www.well.company/for-investors/news-releases/well-health-to-acquire-cycuras-services-division-to-protect-personal-health-information
Across Canada, EMR services have been adopted by 79% of primary care physicians and 73% of
specialists as a key solution for centralizing patient records, scheduling, contact and general workflow
management. Some of the highest adoption rates have been in British Columbia (~90%) and Ontario
(~85%).
The leading platforms available in Canada include:
TELUS Health, which has grown through accretive M&A transactions involving KinLogix (2012), Wolfe
Medical Systems (2012), PS SUITE EMR (2013), Med Access (2014) and Nightingale Informatix
(2016). Telus has a footprint that is in the range of 20,000–25,000 users.
The second-largest platform is from Loblaw, which has been a leader in the space following its 2017
the acquisition of QHR. Loblaw currently has an estimated 15,000–17,000 physicians on its EMR
platform.
WELL’s OSCAR (Open Source Clinical Application Resource) based platform is the third-largest.
Third-party service has developed “forked” versions of this platform and used the initial source code
built custom solutions.
• More on OSCAR EMR: An EMR is like the “operating system” of a medical clinic. It can
help streamline medical practice and helps clinics manage patient data and medical
records more efficiently. OSCAR EMR is an open-source EMR software solution created
by McMaster University’s Department of Family Medicine. With features like patient
records, scheduling and electronic forms (eForms), OSCAR EMR was designed and is
supported by a passionate community of medical professionals, academic institutions
and developers who work to continuously enhance and improve the software. Notably,
when compared to other solutions in market, pricing of OSCAR-based solutions is much
more cost conscious than the incumbents. From a feature perspective, WELL is working
toward a very robust offering that can compete with incumbents and offer a similar level
of functionality.
Figure 9: Coronavirus Impact: U.S. Adults Who Feel Comfortable Talking to Healthcare Practitioners* About a Health Concern
over the Phone or the Internet**, Nov. 2019 & April 2020 (% of respondents)
Source: November 2019 YouGov Survey (n=1,329); April 2020 YouGov Survey (n=1,274), eMarketer (link)
Figure 10: Visits per 1,000 patients from March 15 to April 14 in 2019 vs. 2020, by Patient Age and Type of Visit
Figure 11: Ways in Which the Coronavirus Pandemic Has Caused Disruption to U.S. Healthcare Practitioners*, March 2020
(% of respondents)
9
http://www.mdtax.ca/blog/physicians/making-home-office-deductions/
10
Xakellis GC, Jr, Bennett A. Improving clinic efficiency of a family medicine teaching clinic. Fam. Med. 2001;33:533–538.
Moore CG, Wilson-Witherspoon P, Probst JC. Time and money: effects of no-shows at a family practice residency clinic. Fam. Med. 2001;33:522–527.
Sharp DJ, Hamilton W. Non-attendance at general practices and outpatient clinics. BMJ. 2001;323:1081–1082.
Ferguson S, Kokesh J. Remote Otolaryngology Services: A Cost Comparison Study. 2005
Rust CT, Gallups NH, Clark WS, Jones DS, Wilcox WD. Patient appointment failures in pediatric resident continuity clinics. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1995;149:693–695.
Johnson BJ, Mold JW, Pontious JM. Reduction and management of no-shows by family medicine residency practice exemplars. Ann. Fam. Med. 2007;5:534–539
Bennett KJ, Baxley EG. The effect of a carve-out advanced access scheduling system on no-show rates. Fam. Med. 2009;41:51–56.
Dreiher J, Goldbart A, Hershkovich J, Vardy DA, Cohen AD. Factors associated with non-attendance at pediatric allergy clinics. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2008;19:559–563.
Cohen AD, Dreiher J, Vardy DA, Weitzman D. Nonattendance in a dermatology clinic--a large sample analysis. J Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2008;22:1178–1183.
Lehmann TN, Aebi A, Lehmann D, Balandraux OM, Stalder H. Missed appointments at a Swiss university outpatient clinic. Public Health. 2007;121:790–799.
Growth Strategy Poised to Strengthen Tech Stack & Help Gain Market Share
Management has highlighted the following initiatives it is focused on that should help the company
increase its addressable market and penetration.
11
https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/profiles/kashing-li/
telehealth platform and Phelix.ai are integrated with WELL’s OSCAR Pro software platform. Given
that WELL has now achieved ~15% market share of the EMR market in Canada, we believe
Digital Health Apps will be a major focus area for the company in order to sell additional tools,
software and services into its EMR network of 1,900 clinics and 10,000 physicians across Canada,
thereby unlocking the potential of its EMR customer base.
4. Cybersecurity: We are expecting WELL will close its announced acquisition of Cycura’s services
division by the end of August/early September. We expect the company could announce
additional cybersecurity services or product-related acquisitions in 2021 to complement its Cycura
acquisition.
5. Expansion into the U.S.: The U.S. is a fertile opportunity for WELL with an abundance of
acquisition opportunities and obvious size benefits. We believe an acquisition or investment into a
U.S.-based digitial health technology company would be WELL’s preferred expansion route.
Financial Forecast
Revenue Forecast
On a consolidated basis, we see revenue increasing from $43.5 million in 2020 to $56.4 million in
2021. This represents 30% growth driven by modest single-digit organic growth in the clinic business,
~10% growth from the EMR assets, with the balance from M&A. Our forecast assumes the company
will acquire six additional clinics by mid-2022 and complete four additional technology acquistions. For
fiscal 2022, we forecast revenue of $68.5 million, representing growth of 22% year-over-year.
Improving Profitability
Gross margin has seen improvement as an increasingly large portion of revenue is SaaS-based tech
revenue. The clinical side of the business is generally stable and we expect margins to remain in the
~30% range for that portion of the business. There is opportunity to expand clinical gross margins with
additional non-insured service offerings such as cosmetic treatments.
While WELL will continue to benefit from expanding margins, we expect the company to continue to
prioritize growth over profitablitiy in the near term. We forecast 2020 adjusted EBITDA of ($0.5 million),
$4.4 million in 2021, and $6.2 million in 2022. This represents a slight negative margin of -1.2% in
2020, positive 7.8% in 2021 and improving to 9.0% in 2022.
15.0%
$45.0
9.0%
7.8% 10.0%
$35.0
5.0%
(1.2%)
$25.0 0.0%
(5.2%)
(5.0%)
$15.0
(11.2%)
$6.2 (10.0%)
$4.4
$5.0 ($1.7) ($0.5)
($1.2) (15.0%)
2020E
2021E
2022E
2018
2019
($5.0) (20.0%)
WELL Health Technologies ($CAD) 2019A 2020E y/y % 2021E y/y % 2022E y/y %
(December 31 fiscal year-end)
Revenue ($Mln) $32.8 $43.5 32.7% $56.4 29.5% $68.5 21.6%
Gross profit ($Mln) $11.0 $16.9 53.7% $22.4 32.8% $28.2 25.7%
Gross margin % 33.5% 38.8% 39.8% 41.1%
General & Administrative Expenses ($Mln) $12.0 $17.4 $18.4 $22.0
% of revenue 36.5% 40.0% 32.7% 32.1%
Valuation
We are initiating coverage of WELL Technologies with a Buy rating and $4.10 target price (rounded
from $4.09), representing a 5.0x 2022 estimated EV/Revenue multiple on its clinical assets and a
10.0x 2022 estimated EV/Revenue multiple on its technology assets. This represents a 7.6x
EV/Revenue multiple on consolidated revenue.
We credit the company’s strong execution on M&A and assume six clinical acquisitions and four
technology acquisitions in the coming two years. We highlight U.S. healthcare/tech names that are
trading in the teens. We note that should the mix of revenue tilt more toward higher-margin software
business, this could drive multiple expansion for the overall company.
Management has pointed to One Medical as a relevant comparable who operates a network of digitally
enabled primary care clinics across multiple states, by providing digital services and solutions like
online scheduling, virtual visits and EMR. It generates revenue through an annual membership fee as
well as from companies/employers, and insurers. The company has nearly 500,000 members across
~85 medical clinics throughout more than a dozen major markets in the U.S. and partners with
companies to bring their services to employees. WELL reports over 600,000 patient visits annually in
its clinics and over 15-million registered patients in its digital portfolio, thus we believe there is further
upside to our valuation, considering that this notable comparable trades at 11.6x EV/Revenue.
Risks
Reimbursement: Changes in government and reimbursement schemes are a significant source of
uncertainty.
Competing Technologies: From Microsoft to competing digital health companies, many are looking to
grow the breadth of integrated digital health solutions that can be bolted onto our existing healthcare
delivery mechanisms.
Economic Sensitivity: Deteriorating economic conditions could have an adverse effect on many
business areas, including technology spending.
Board of Directors
Mr. Shahbazi, the Chair, is joined by the following board members:
John Kim — Independent Director: Mr. Kim is a Toronto-based businessman and award-winning
Institutional investor for 20+ years with an extensive capital markets network. His investment focus has
included companies from a variety of sectors, including technology, healthcare and resources at
various stages of development, ranging from early start-ups to Fortune 1000 Companies. John has
both public and private company board experience and has participated in the WELL’s prior financings
with his own personal capital.
Ken Cawkell — Independent Director: Mr. Cawkell co-founded Cawkell Brodie LLP and has been a
member of the B.C. Bar Association for 30 years. For 25+ years, he has been involved in various
industries within public, private and venture capital sectors. He is also a founder of Neurodyn Life
Sciences Inc., a private biotech company focused on developing natural-based products to treat
Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Tara McCarville — Independent Director: Tara is Principal of Brighton Group, a health industries
solution firm. Previously, she was Partner and the National Health Industries Leader for PwC Canada
and served as a board member with OntarioMD, Canada’s only certification body for EMR companies
from 2017 to 2019. Tara also previously held an executive role with Trillium Health Partners from 2013
to 2016 and as Principal/Practice leader with TELUS Health from 2011 to 2013 where she led a
number of important initiatives and strategies.
Tom Liston — Independent Director: Mr. Liston has extensive board experience. He sits on the
board of Mogo Finance Technology Inc. He served as a director for QHR Technologies Inc., which was
sold to Loblaw Companies Limited. Mr. Liston spent over 15 years as a top-ranked technology
research analyst for Yorkton Securities, Versant Partners and Cantor Fitzgerald in Canada. He is a
managing partner at Difference Capital Financial.
Source: Forbes, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Health Statistics
EBITDA
Net income (loss) (1.5) (1.7) (4.8) 0.2 (7.8) (2.0) (2.5) (2.6) (2.1) (9.3) (6.8) (6.1)
Currency translation adjustment - - - - - - - - - - - -
Depreciation and amortization 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.9 2.2 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.3 3.7 5.6 6.9
Income tax - 0.1 0.1 (0.1) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.4
Interest income (0.0) (0.0) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.1) - - - - - -
Interest expense 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.4 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.5 -
EBITDA (0.9) (1.0) (3.8) 1.3 (4.4) (0.9) (1.5) (1.2) (0.6) (4.1) (0.3) 1.1
Rent expense on finance leases (0.4) (0.4) (0.5) (0.4) (1.6) (0.5) - - - - - -
Stock-based compensation 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.7 2.9 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 2.7 3.5 4.2
Net loss from discontinued operations - - - - - - - - - - - -
Special warrants related expenses - - 2.5 (2.7) (0.2) - - - (0.2) - - -
Time-based earn-out expense 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.8 0.8
Transaction and restructuring costs expensed 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.1 - - - - 0.4 -
Adjusted EBITDA (0.3) (0.6) (0.5) (0.3) (1.7) (0.2) (0.6) (0.3) 0.2 (0.5) 4.4 6.2
Non-Current Assets
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Investment accounted for using equity method - - - - - 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
Property, plant, equipment 12.8 12.5 13.4 12.5 12.5 14.0 13.9 13.4 12.8 12.8 9.9 6.5
Lease receivable 2.3 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Other non-current assets 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Goodwill 10.4 11.3 22.3 24.9 24.9 32.0 38.2 40.7 40.7 40.7 50.7 60.7
Investment - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Non-Current Assets 26.0 26.5 38.4 39.6 39.6 54.1 60.2 62.1 61.5 61.5 68.7 75.3
Total Assets 31.4 40.9 60.8 58.5 58.5 75.1 85.9 79.3 76.3 76.3 79.4 92.4
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 1.5 1.8 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.1 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.4 3.1 3.7
Deferred revenue 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Current portion deferred acquisition costs 0.4 0.3 3.2 2.4 2.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9
Lease liability 2.1 2.2 2.3 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Income tax payable - - 0.1 - - - - - - - - -
Special warrants - - 15.9 - - - - - - - - -
Other current liabilities 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Contingent consideration - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current portion loans - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Current Liabilities 4.4 4.9 25.3 8.4 8.4 8.7 7.5 7.6 8.0 8.0 8.7 9.2
Non-Current Liabilities
Deferred acquisition costs 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Convertible debentures - 8.9 8.9 4.7 4.7 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2
Lease liability 13.3 13.0 13.8 13.0 13.0 13.9 13.3 12.7 12.1 12.1 9.7 7.3
Other non-current liabilities 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Deferred tax liability - - - - - - - - - - - -
Loans - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Non-Current liabilities 13.8 22.2 23.2 18.1 18.1 26.9 26.3 25.7 25.1 25.1 22.7 20.3
Total Liabilities 18.2 27.1 48.5 26.5 26.5 35.7 33.9 33.4 33.2 33.2 31.4 29.6
Shareholders' Equity
Share capital 22.0 23.1 25.3 45.4 45.4 53.8 66.5 61.3 58.9 58.9 62.4 77.2
Subscription receivable - - - - - - - - - - - -
Contributed surplus 1.9 3.2 4.4 3.7 3.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7
Accumulated other comprehensive income 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Deficit (10.8) (12.5) (17.3) (17.1) (17.1) (19.2) (19.2) (19.2) (19.2) (19.2) (19.2) (19.2)
Total SE 13.2 13.8 12.3 32.0 32.0 39.3 52.1 46.9 44.5 44.5 48.0 62.8
NCI - - - 0.0 0.0 0.1 - - - - - -
Total Liabilities & SE 31.4 40.9 60.8 58.5 58.5 75.1 85.9 80.3 77.7 77.7 79.4 92.4
CFF
Private placements 2.7 - - - 2.7 - - - - - - -
Proceeds on issuance of common shares - - - - - - 14.4 - - 14.4 - 20.0
Share issue costs (0.0) - - (0.0) (0.0) - - - - - - -
Convertible debentures - 10.5 - - 10.5 11.0 - - - 11.0 - -
Debt issuance costs - (0.6) (0.0) (0.1) (0.8) (0.8) - - - (0.8) - -
Special warrants - - 15.0 - 15.0 - - - - - - -
Special warrants issue costs - - (1.1) 1.1 - - - - - - - -
Payment of interest on convertible debentures - - - (0.4) (0.4) (0.0) - - - (0.0) - -
Subscriptions receivable - - - - - - - - - - - -
Options exercised 0.1 - - - 0.1 0.0 - - - 0.0 - -
Agent warrants exercised 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 - - - 0.4 - -
Shareholder warrants exercised 0.4 0.5 - 0.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
Loan proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - -
Loan payments - - - - - - - - - - - -
Finance lease payments (0.5) (0.5) (0.6) (0.5) (2.1) (0.6) (0.6) (0.6) (0.6) (2.4) (2.4) (2.4)
DISCLAIMER SECTION
Company Ticker Disclosures
Total 153
*Includes companies with a "Tender" recommendation
RESEARCH SALES
Diversified Industries John Bellamy (Head of Sales) 416.361.6032
Corey Hammill (Head of Research) 416.361.0754 David Roland 416.216.6844
Alexandra Ricci 416.361.6056 Daniel Carthew 416-216-3583
Naomi Ebata, CFA 416.364.9764
Healthcare Adriaan Kruger 416.361.5987
Scott McAuley, PhD 416.361.9080 Wolfgang Rosner 514.447.8950
Sepehr Manochehry, PhD 416.361.6228
TRADING
Technology Peter Dunlop 416.368.6557
Daniel Rosenberg 416.361.6054 Tom George 416.360.3579
Matthew Green 416.364.7988
Energy Services
Jason Tucker 403.513.1031 OFFICES
Toronto
Metals, Mining & Agriculture 95 Wellington Street West, Suite 2101, PO Box 55
David Davidson 416.360.3462 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N7
Jeff Woolley, CFA 416.361.9557 General Line 416.361.9892
Gordon Lawson 416.363.5476 Fax Line 416.361.6050
Jamie Carmichael 416.365.5297
Calgary
Gold and Precious Metals 110-9th Avenue SW
Don MacLean 416.360.3459 Suite 500
Don Blyth 416.360.3461 Calgary, Alberta T2P 0T1
Lauren McConnell 416.366.7776 General Line 403.513.1025
Fax (Research) 403.265.8721
Industrial Products
Marvin Wolff, CFA 416.361.3376 STOCK RATING SYSTEM
Buy: Expected returns of 20% or more over 12 months.
Quantitative & Technical Analysis
Speculative Buy: Expected returns of 20% or more over the next 12
Aazan Habib, CFA, CMT 778.237.2607 months on high-risk development or pre-revenue companies, such as
junior mining and other early stage companies.
Hold: Expected returns of less than 20% over the next 12 months.
Sell: Expected returns of -20% or more over the next 12 months. .